#874: November 30, 2023 dissects Alex Jones’ wild claims—Henry Kissinger’s death as a "globalist trigger" for Disease X lockdowns, Roger Stone’s baseless accusations of a shadowy "fake me" account, and Trump’s alleged deep-state assassination threats tied to a debunked Parkland doc theory. Jones twists FCC broadband rules into censorship, cites unverified Navy leaks on vaccines, and merges depopulation conspiracies with a bizarre God-devil test narrative, while Jordan and Dan mock his statistical fabrications (80% regional elections for "anti-globalists") and theological tangents. The episode reveals how Jones’ embellishments—like 20-family control or JFK’s murder—prioritize spectacle over substance, exposing the fragility of his credibility even among fringe allies like Stone. [Automatically generated summary]
You know, for all of us, I think there's a certain amount of we go out, we look at the world, and we see a little bit of like, okay, well, I'm sitting and I'm watching the world collapse around me.
And then you have a shooting star where you're like, well, at least that's an enjoyable bit for a while.
You know, I'm seeing all the collapse, but look at that.
I don't want to spoil anything about whether or not that's a good bet.
Oh.
It's interesting the way your bet will play out.
Okay.
Because, I mean, it's, you know, to go back to house, you know, one of the songs they played on House all the time is you can't always get what you want.
You think you're going to tune in for a show all about, you know, like if your greatest villain, or let's say at least Mount Rushmore level of villain.
I've got something really powerful for you, and it's a powerful truth, and it's a powerful tool, but really it's getting out there to a wider audience is not in my hands now.
It's in your hands.
Just like we did in August, we said they're planning the mask, the fear, the new shots, new viruses, controls, according to our whistleblowers and sources, get ready.
And they began to try to roll it out, but the public resisted and said no, so they backed off.
But I said, watch.
They'll come back in a few months and do it again.
But this time they'll go all the way.
We caught them with their pants down.
Now it's official.
UN calls for lockdowns all over the world, calls for return to COVID protocols, absolute fear-mongering.
All the UN minions are saying disease X is about to hit.
It's going to be 20 times worse.
You better submit to the UN and world government carbon taxes as a way to reduce population, or we're going to have to do it the other way, wink, wink.
That's what William Shatner and all of them say.
Look, you better do what we say.
You better let us start reducing population these other ways, or we're going to hit you with viruses.
You better give us full control.
So we're being held hostage by a global criminal cabal with bioweapons.
And that people like Alex and all these folks have been so combative, so violent, so threatening, so demonizing of public health officials that they, in effect, make it impossible for public health officials to do their job effectively.
Even though Kissinger is one of the top architects of the current world government system we're in, I'd say Brzezinski was really more influential and actually the field marshal.
He was Napoleon, and Kissinger would be one of his top generals, but not in charge.
But Kissinger was more flamboyant.
He was better at getting all the credit for himself.
It was Zabignan Brzezinski, is the real architect, but this guy's like the foreman.
Kissinger was like the foreman for the architect executing it.
And so, even just a month or so ago, he came out and said, everybody's turning against the neoliberal governments because we're flooding them with illegal aliens.
And the illegal aliens, 90-plus%, are not assimilating.
And it's designed like that to have a permanent underclass they have.
But even Kissinger and the top British ministers over migration, all of them are saying this is wrong while they still flood you.
So they politically are acting like, hey, we're against this when they're the architects of it.
Here's the club of Kissinger.
unidentified
What's a grave mistake to let in so many people of totally different culture and religious and concepts because it creates a pressure group inside each country that that's it?
Also, it's worth noting that that little clip of Kissinger comes from a larger interview.
That interview took place just after the attack on October 7th, and he's specifically talking about how there were pro-Palestinian celebrations in Germany.
Kissinger was talking about something specific, but xenophobic right-wing media has turned this into something far more general so they can attack the very idea of immigrants coming in.
And beyond that, who cares about what Kissinger says?
I mean, this isn't the end of the last crusade where he's been alive for a thousand years and he's got one thing to say before he disintegrates into the wind.
But Kissinger did put out State Department Memorandum 200 in 1972 that amended official U.S. government policy to reduce fertility in the U.S. and the third world by a whole host of issues like so-called vaccines, and the list goes on from there.
Poison food.
It's all listed in Memorandum 200, and that's just declassified options that came out in the early 90s.
So these guys really do mean business.
Meanwhile, he wanted to ban you being able to have red meat, but it's on record in the news today that Kissinger was obsessed with Jaeger Schnitzel, which is one of my favorites.
It's funny that you bring up Watergate because Henry Kissinger, in many ways, was actually the driving force behind Watergate.
We'll get to that in a moment.
History lets him escape unscathed.
But yeah, I knew Dr. Kissinger.
I met him when I was working for President Nixon.
I had much more extensive encounters with him later when I was working for candidate then president Ronald Reagan.
Henry Kissinger was brilliant.
He was extraordinarily duplicitous.
He was power-hungry.
He was a very skillful, bureaucratic infighter.
Nixon told me directly that the reason he never destroyed the tapes was because he feared that Henry Kissinger would seek to take credit for Nixon's foreign policy achievements after Nixon's death.
When you say what achievements, well, the strategic arms limitation agreement with the Soviets, the end of the Vietnam War, the opening to China, which I defend, frankly, because at the time that Nixon and Kissinger decided to open the door to China, China was a dirt-poor, agrarian country with more ox than automobiles.
There was no way for Nixon to see that on the advice of Henry Kissinger, many years later, the Bushes and the Clintons would give China most favored trading, pardon me, most favored nation trading status.
And of course, Bill Clinton would actually sell them our top secret missile targets.
I mean, since Kissinger is associated with that, might as well.
An important point to bring up here, though, is that Alex should not have this perspective on the opening up of China.
In his own book, The Great Reset, Alex decries the opening of China as big international businesses coming in and setting up one-party rule in order to make all the money.
His position in the book is diametrically opposed to the one he's expressing here on the show, mostly because he doesn't have a real position that means anything, and he didn't write the book.
To keep in line with anti-communist tradition, he needs to be opposed to the opening of China, because according to that mythology, it was done to support and enable the communists.
Otherwise, why wouldn't they have put Shang Kai-shek in power back in the 40s?
Roger probably isn't going to play ball with that because he loves Nixon so much.
So the best bet here is just to say that Nixon meant well when he opened up China, but then the dreaded Clintons undid all the goodwill that he put into it.
No, I mean, there's a little bit of, you know, if you've ever been on the set, you know, maybe you've had a long day of shooting, and then your script supervisor shows up and goes, you know, this does not track with what you did a couple of weeks ago.
You got to throw the whole thing away.
Imagine if Alex had to be accountable to his book.
There was a book supervisor right there with him just being like, whispering.
I'm sorry, you actually can't believe that, according to the book that you quote unquote wrote.
I mean, first of all, when Nixon learns that the Pentagon papers, which are really State Department documents that show how the Vietnam War started, how it got out of control, and so on, Nixon was completely unconcerned because all they showed were the mistakes of the Kennedy administration and the Johnson administration.
They had no bearing on his handling of the war.
It was Kissinger who went insane.
It was Kissinger who demanded the illegal wiretaps of the national security staff, of White House staff members, and actually members of the press to try to find out who the leaker was.
It was Henry Kissinger who drove the break-in at Daniel Ellsberg's psychiatrist.
Ellsberg was the State Department or the NSC official who actually leaked the Pentagon papers to the media.
It was Henry Kissinger who convinced Nixon to have Attorney General John Mitchell sue the New York Times and the Washington Post in an effort to prevent the publication of the Pentagon papers, which really were not at all damaging to Richard Nixon.
I think it's important to recognize that one of, I think, Nixon's greatest achievements is in the 1973 Yom Kippur War, when very similar to what happened on October 7th, Israel has a complete intelligence breakdown, and there's a surprise attack on Israel by the Egyptians and the Syrians.
The Israelis are caught short.
They are literally with their backs against the sea and completely out of ammunition.
Israeli Prime Minister Goldermair sends out an emergency message to President Nixon asking for an airlift of $36 million of lethal aid.
Kissinger is adamantly, vehemently opposed.
So is the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Thomas Moore.
So is the State Department.
So is the entire national security apparatus.
Kissinger's argument to Nixon is it might provoke the Russians.
Nixon says, I don't care if it provokes the Russians.
An ally is under attack.
It's the only democracy in the region.
I will stand with Israel.
Nixon then gives the order for the airlift, but Kissinger decides to try to wait him out, hoping that Nixon will change his mind.
Late the following afternoon, Nixon says, well, has he received the lethal aid?
And Kissinger says, no, Mr. President, we have not sent it yet.
We don't know what kind of plane to use.
Nixon calls Admiral Moore.
This is one of the Watergate tapes they never play.
And basically says, I'll tell you what plane to send.
Anything that flies.
If that aid is not on its way to Israel in the next two hours, I'm coming over to the Pentagon and putting my foot up your ass.
This can be found.
The media will never play this.
So Kissinger really tried to undermine Israel.
Richard Nixon, despite what he may have said in the White House tapes in terms of derogatory comments about Jews, Richard Nixon systematically saved Israel from annihilation in 1973 over the objections of Kissinger.
It is in that role that Kissinger contacted President Trump to try to persuade Trump to extradite Miles Guo, a Chinese dissident, which Nixon, pardon me, which Trump declined to do.
Kissinger is most definitely aligned with the Chinese, although he's not adverse to taking a few bucks from the Russians either.
So I'm not sure if Kissinger wanted Trump to extradite Miles Guo, but I do know that Guo sued the shit out of Roger for making defamatory claims about him on Infowars.
Guo sued Roger for $100 million for making baseless allegations about financial and election-related crimes.
Roger did a real quick about face on that.
He issued a full apology, and he claimed that he was just repeating things his buddy told him.
So if I were him, I would come up with a different example of the way that Kissinger was an agent of China than bringing up the guy who you lied about on this show, the same show, and got sued for $100 million and then had to apologize.
And then they'll use that at the FBI and CIA to keep you and I, which I know they do, in this foreign intelligence operative situation, the shadow government that Obama that we'll talk about in a minute.
They're confirmed to have set up.
So they go out and set things up, link us to Russia, then persecute us and use CIA resources, lawfare, and the whole system that just got leaked yesterday against us.
That's why they do that.
They literally go into Congress in closed doors and go, look, he runs a Russian thing.
The Biden administration is going to the FCC, and they now are going to have the FCC for the first time ever, for the first time in 40 years since the inception of the internet, they're going to censor the internet in the name of equity at the source.
So they no longer have to lean on Facebook or Instagram or X or TikTok.
Yeah, the FCC voted for new regulations put forward by the Biden administration that, for the first time ever, will allow them to censor content on the internet.
In other words, they'll be able to decide, essentially, Alex, whether you or I or some other patriot can have a URL.
So this surrounds section 60506 from 2021's infrastructure bill.
That section just said that the FCC was mandated to make rules that would, quote, prevent discrimination in the deployment of broadband internet access based on income level, race, ethnicity, color, religion, or national origin.
In the real world, the conversation around this is about that first one: income level.
How is the FCC going to be able to not allow broadband providers from discriminating against people based on income level?
It seems like the only really viable way they could do that is through price regulation, which is what the actual concern and the conversation people are having about this is.
This has nothing to do with censoring the internet, but figures on the extreme right wing are pretending that it is.
And there's two major reasons that that charade is being perpetuated.
The first is the most obvious, which is that people in the extreme right wing are obsessed with creating their own oppression.
They aren't being oppressed, so they need to take every chance they get to build unrelated things into the most tyrannical chains around their neck.
The social media space is a prime territory for these games to be played out because everyone's addicted to social media, and these right-wing folks believe that they're entitled to behave however they want online, and no one should be able to criticize them for it.
This creates a perfect landscape for these kinds of narratives to take shape.
You can turn anything, you can mold the unformed clay into this form, and people will buy it 100 times out of 100.
The second reason this game is being played where potential regulation about broadband access discrimination is being reported as about censoring your dumb COVID conspiracy posts is because the right wing at the top is beholden to corporate interests.
Regulating the price of internet access is a pretty attractive idea to anyone who's had to deal with internet service providers, but it's a very threatening thing to the profits of these businesses.
These corporate interests know that there's no way to get normal people mad about this plan to prohibit discrimination in terms of broadband access.
So in order to fight the regulation, it needs to be presented as being about something else.
People like Alex and Roger need to lie to their audience to get them excited about this topic at all.
If they presented the information as it actually exists in reality, no one would care and most people would think it's a good idea.
One of the roles that people like Alex fulfill is to transform something threatening to big corporate profits into something that appears threatening to your personal safety, so you'll be tricked into opposing it.
And that's one of the things that's at play with this.
Yeah, it's always amazed me because it is a level.
It's the way that it's one of those things that bums me out so much.
It's not that our government is purchasable.
It's that it's so fucking cheap.
You know, like, because broadband internet access is one of those things that it seems like you should be unbribable upon because there is a 100% support behind you just being like, hey, here's my new bill.
Government has internet support.
And all you have to know is that you'll never have to speak to Comcast again.
100% support.
100% approval rating.
The only fear you have from that is they'll murder you.
They're going to kill you.
Comcast will absolutely murder any politician that tries to do that shit.
I don't know about the full deprivatization of broadband access.
I don't know about that.
I don't know if that would have blanket or even fully broad support, but regulating the ways that these internet service providers can behave, what they can charge.
There is an effective monopoly in a lot of cities around the country.
And so having some kind of a check on that from the government, I think is something that most people would probably be pretty in favor of, which is why you have to change the narrative entirely.
The FCC is not going to make it so you can't post about Trump.
No, no, no.
So Alex has some thoughts about global politics, how there are anti-globalists being elected everywhere.
And while I do agree with him that there are some troubling things like we've discussed with the Netherlands, with Argentina, I do think Alex is making up some numbers here.
They, just, as you know, a few years ago, got rid of the electronic voting machines, got paper ballots, which aren't perfect, but are way better.
And magically, he wins.
And we also have El Salvador with a Patreon in.
Whether you look at Sweden or Greece or the Netherlands or Italy or New Zealand.
I've looked at the numbers.
About 80% of regional elections around the world are going to anti-globalist, and around 65, 70% are going at the presidential or the ministerial prime minister level.
That has got to scare the hell out of the new world order.
Give me your million-foot view, then let's zoom into 10,000 feet with Javier Malay and Argentina.
You said this a few years ago to run again, but they messed with him and threatened him and attacked him so much.
And he then saw how America was being destroyed.
You told me privately that, well, it looks like he's going to do it.
And you said, but don't tell anybody.
Six months before he even started saying he was.
I'm giving some inside baseball, but it's okay now.
It's in hindsight to show how accurate you were.
And so they drafted him by intimidating and trying to threaten him or trying to intimidate him.
And now, as you said, this is a new Trump.
He's totally wise now.
He knows about the deep state.
And they say that, oh my God, we're all going to jail.
Well, yeah, not because you're the political opposition, but because you've engaged in treason and you're never going to stop trying to stop us from saving the country and the world until you do go to prison.
You're the ones that censored.
You're the ones that targeted people with lawfare and fake criminal charges.
You're the ones that did everything you now claim Trump is going to do.
Well, he better do it, not out of vengeance, but out of justice, Roger.
I think they've used the occasion of the 60th anniversary of the murder of John Kennedy, the revelations by this 88-year-old former Secret Service agent, Paul Landis, plus this shocking new documentary, actually reviewed in the New York Times, what the Parkland doctors saw.
They're using all that media coverage plus this new narrative, what happens if Trump dies, to try to normalize people to the idea that that's a possibility.
Look, every single night when I say my prayers, I pray for the safety of Donald Trump.
Every Sunday at church, I light a candle for him.
He is our last best hope to save this country and Western civilization.
What is it going to take for us to remember that you should, that being old, like being past 70 meant you were going to die any moment for a long time?
It is like every nutritionist should have to, the first day that you sit down and have a talk with them, they should have to explain why Donald Trump's not dead.
You know, they seem to be unaware of the fact that just trying to lock him up because of all these fabricated crimes has turbo-charged his campaign and turbo-charged his movement.
So, yeah, Roger was teasing the book, and he's like, I don't want to give any spoilers, but take a look at George H.W. Wait, you just spoiled the book.
I've made a real deep dive, deep, deep dive study of the New World Order and history and different elites and how they operate and what they want and what they're doing.
And here's what it comes down to: there are fabulous technologies available right now and a lot of things that are being suppressed that are seen as disruptive technologies by the establishment that they don't want the general public to have because it will free up civilization even more.
And we'll be able to do even more incredible things, and then they won't control the future.
They're threatened by dynamic societies because those will give rise to individuals and ideas and groups that will supplant the current ruling class, which you need to supplant ruling classes.
Even if they got there through hard work, it's time to move over every few generations and there's new blood.
The very selfish, selfish, cold-blooded decision has been made by less than 20 families to dumb people down, to turn us against each other, to poison us and make us so toxic and so stunned that we will then accept being depopulated by 90%.
Sure, but I mean, when you stop and think about how funny it is for people to actually believe in that noise, you know, whenever you're like, okay, so if the same family's been in charge for like a thousand years, you know how many people that family are related to that family now.
Like it's it's comical to imagine that these, even though there is institutional power that comes from, you know, I'm not going to pretend that's not the case.
Sure.
But the idea that there is just 20 families that have decided to kill off humanity.
It's fun, I guess, in a conspiracy bong session kind of way.
Forgot so loaded the world that they're projecting their hatred of themselves upon us.
And they're not fulfilled because they're not standing up for the species.
But they're totally committed.
So 20-plus million people are dead from the shots.
The Navy just released an official document that was secret and it's been leaked, but they confirm it's real that there's a 900-plus percent increase in heart failure in the Navy and similar numbers in the other branches of the military.
So there's a video going around social media of a guy in a military uniform claiming that he found numbers that reflect these huge increases in heart failure in the Navy.
But these aren't numbers that have been made public and no one's reviewed this at all.
It's just a guy in his Navy outfit saying all this stuff in a video that someone posted to social media.
But folks like Russell Brand and the Blaze have picked it up and now Alex is catching the ball and embellishing the story out further.
Now it's not a guy in a video.
It's secret leaked reports that the Navy has admitted are real.
Sure.
Now it's not just the Navy, it's also other branches of service.
It's important to recognize these techniques because they're the fingerprints of a liar and how Alex operates.
He takes some entirely flimsy story that no one has any reason to take at face value.
And in order to boost his reporting of it, he adds details.
Alex needs to differentiate himself from all these other shitheads like Russell Brand and the Blaze who are reporting on the same meaningless shit that he covers.
Alex used to do this with real things, like the Mayak report.
He would add layers onto something that is a real thing.
Now he has to just do that with memes.
That's pretty dark.
So I looked into it a little bit, and this is a guy who is has a history of making a bunch of anti-vex claims.
So this remains to be seen.
But at this point, it's just more grist for the mill of the anti-vex COVID conspiracy bullshit economy needs these constant hits in order to keep like Alex has a bombshell every fucking week that all just gets forgotten and we're all supposed to be dead so many points.
I mean, but it's like, it makes no sense to me how we're not past that kind of bullshit already.
You know, like, because we've all watched so many super intelligent, super qualified people freak the fuck out because there's a 15% increase in something somewhere.
And you're like, 15%?
I don't even know if that's a lot.
But if somebody says 900%, you would see that's like a waterfall.
And I'm going to play clips for you here in just a few minutes that tie into this.
And I'm going to explain how the rollout's going to happen, How it's going to unfold and the different layers to it, the layers of the people implementing it, but also the layers to the attack because we have the enemy blueprint.
God gives us free will.
God loves us and wanted to create creatures in his image, little g, not God's, but little, little g's.
And we have to go through this to prove our worth.
And God gave us free will.
And God in God's perfection made the decision.
Is it immoral for God to create new entities that will have free will and will be able to grasp infinity, not control it or be omnipresent, but understand it?
Feel it.
Be it.
And God said yes.
Try it.
I will create new entities that will then henceforth continue on eternally.
I mean, you know, earlier yesterday, I was, I can't remember why it came up, but I was looking at these photos that the Russian probe sent back from Venus, from the surface of Venus.
You know, like we can't see it because it's surrounded by so much gas and the temperature is absurd.
Knowing what I know now, clearly, eight-year-old me watching a rerun of Star Trek is going to be like, you know how important that guy is going to be to the king.
And sometimes when he listens back to the show, he realizes I should just get to the point and then lay out the information as opposed to what I normally do.
And then seems to have gotten to the point in a very rushed fashion at the end, which is not the same point that he had before, which was magic technologies are being suppressed by the globalists.
And now it's there are already new viruses that have been released, and it's because the globalists gave you the vaccine, which killed your immune system.
So now you're going to get all these viruses, and it's the bioweapon.
Because he wants the life extension technology that the globalists will only give him if he tells everyone that they're going to die and they need to follow King Charles.
I saw Beto O'Rourke on the screen there a couple minutes ago.
I haven't seen him.
I think he only pops up out of sulfur pits once every four years, right when the elections come.
But looking at him, too, he's really interesting because I feel like he's sort of a reflection of what happens when you join the occult cabal and you start injecting baby foreskin stem cells in your face.
But once you hit 30, so the guy looks like he's both a 14-year-old pre-pubescent late bloomer and a 47-year-old geriatric patient meshed into one person.
It's very demonic, very sick.
Yeah, but I mean, genuinely, Alex, they've been saying for over 40 years that we're going to die in 12 years.
And to be completely honest, with the way the world's going, I wish they were correct.
I wish they were honest because I honestly wouldn't mind exiting this earth a little sooner than later, if you know what I mean.
No, well, I was going to ask you, speaking of Africa and that, and groups that require a lot, I don't know if you, would you want a present if I sent you something?
Because I literally got you a present for representation because right now we're in the era of people in other lands, other people desire to take everything.
And in Australia, we have the Aboriginal people here.
This is an Aboriginal doll with a hollowed out wooden stick that they use as an instrument in the clothing they still wear today, which is white paint and sackcloth.
And this is a gift from my co-host to you guys at Infowars because the Aboriginals also tell people in Australia that $40 billion a year of free money is not enough, that the entire country of Australia and all the modern cities belong to them as well.
And so in order to keep up with diversifying and meet diversity quotas at the Infowars studio, I'm going to go ahead and mail this to your family.
One of the different, one of the things that to me means funny, if that makes sense, in my career, at least, was comedy and humor allowed me to go anywhere.
You know, like it didn't matter if it was a scary place for anybody, you know?
Like, if you're funny, you can walk in anywhere, even the most threatening bar where people have got like knives pointed at your face.
If you're funny, you can walk in there and everybody will be like, let's have a drink.
I think it would be really cool if you could get actual, like, what Stone, like in a completely neutral setting, no advantages or no InfoWars or anything like that.
Like, Stone, tell me real, true stories.
I bet he's got some really interesting stories about fucking Kissinger.
And I bet that his analysis of like how someone works in those spaces would be different than you would get from almost anybody else because of the ways they're both manipulators.
No, it would be like of all the people who would tell me about a Kissinger thing, right?
Stone's the one whose information I'm going to use, if that makes sense.
Like, you can tell me about a story you had with Kissinger, but if Stone is telling me, like, ah, now I know Kissinger does this, but we went out drinking and Kissinger said that he does this, I would be like, I will use that information.