Today, Dan and Jordan check in with Mark Bankston, lead attorney for the Sandy Hook plaintiffs in the Texas litigations. In this installment, the gents get an update on various legal issues related to Alex including sanctions against his lawyer, thoughts about the bankruptcy, and Alex's bizarre retraction/apology video regarding Scarlett Lewis. Also, there's lizard news.
You know, no matter how much you press and how much you do in the streets or how much you try to do in the voting booth, you just can't seem to change it.
Police are killing people at a ridiculous rate and under ridiculous circumstances.
And the only thing that seems to be able to be changing some of these cities' behavior and how they're running their police departments or managing or training them is large lawsuit liability.
I think everybody knows who I would be representing in that situation.
It's a really nasty case.
Hopefully, we'll be announcing a lawsuit on it soon, so you'll probably see me in the news for that.
But yeah, we've been having some other really good stuff going on.
We were able to really take some good time off there towards the end of the year, which I desperately needed because I was overworked on so many other cases, including the Alex Jones thing.
But yeah, we're popping back into the swing of things right now.
Spring's in the air.
Just got my kid new.
We got a pair of new mini dirt bikes we're going to be riding around.
So, I have, like, gosh, okay, you'll make me nerd out, because I know people like to hear about this kind of stuff, but I have what is basically a semi-Skyrim-themed garden.
Like, it's a wizard's garden with dragon statuary, and, you know, like, there's Viking shield, like, Skyrim-style Viking shield up there.
So, like, just this magical place for my kid to be.
Okay, so, like, if you're really, I know y 'all are Skyrim people, so, like, it's kind of based upon how when you wandered around in Skyrim and you'd find, like, this weird, like, necromancer's altar where there would be, like, these flower gardens growing, and it would be these beautiful moonlit places with, like, and there's crystals laid out.
And a corpse?
Yeah, so we've got skulls.
Yeah, there's just like a skull there.
So yeah, we have a skull with Nordic runes runed into it, like lying in the garden bed.
And like, it's all to give it that kind of feel, like a legit dragon statue, the whole nine yards.
People who've been tracking along know that we have a Staffordshire Terrier, and we've got a little three-legged terrier, and then we've got two different crested geckos, a house full of fish, but we just added a giant blue-tongued skink to the mix.
And that sucker is so much fun.
I'm talking, this guy's like a little sausage with arms as big as my arm.
And then when you bring up that she's a professional Captain Planet, I have to then reconsider my relationship with the childhood version, and I realize that the original Captain Planet, that's an indentured servant, basically, and able to make agency choices on his own, realistically.
You know, when I started the cases and I first brought them and it was just this thing that I concocted to do and I was out there all alone doing it.
And then as this has gone on, like, there was another case that joined, and then we had more families come in, and now we're in this bankruptcy.
Good God, there's so many people involved.
There's a bankruptcy judge, a U.S. trustee, a subchapter 5 trustee, individual attorneys for every corporate entity, attorneys for the families in Connecticut, the attorneys for down here, there's the attorneys for the Unified Creditors Committee.
I mean, there are so many damn people involved that for a trial lawyer, it's a weird feeling because I am now just a very small part of this.
Like, I am not.
There's anybody who right now has the sense of...
Oh, waiting for the story to end and thinking that, like, Mark Bankston is at the controls of the fighter pilot.
Like, nuh-uh, no, not anymore.
Like, I had control of my trial and my cases, and now it is a weird world we have entered in this bankruptcy court.
Is bankruptcy court proceedings are meant to wrap up pretty quickly like they're supposed to go pretty fast and they haven't been able to and I everybody without me even saying it knows why they haven't yeah Well, I mean, maybe a pattern of behavior.
What's interesting, because if you just have the view of it from his show, like I said, you have the forward-facing appearance that he puts on of, like, everything is cool.
We made it through the reorganization, and it's just a matter of you guys gotta keep giving me money.
So you got that, and then you also, at the same time, have him, like, disappearing, like, not being on the show, and having to go to hearings, and, like, pretending that's not what he's going to do.
So you have this, like, just from watching his show, you have this weird image of, like, there's trouble, but he's putting on a brave face.
There's no question that what bankruptcy is designed to do is to keep the business operating while stuff's figured out.
You've got to figure out what to do here.
And so Jones has a bit of an advantage over other businesses that if other businesses are in Chapter 11 and very publicly are sinking into the ocean, that's going to scare off people from giving them money.
But with Jones' case, there are a good cadre of people out there who will throw money into the very tip of the Titanic sinking down.
So that's actually my next question about whenever you brought up that there are so many people now added into this process.
How many of these people do you think are actually equipped to deal with what we're dealing with?
Do you know what I mean?
We've spent years becoming equipped to this, and these people are still in this space of like, well, this is a bankruptcy as opposed to this is a cult leader exploding into a fire in front of us all.
No, yeah, everybody, as opposed to like some stages of this case.
Literally everybody involved, and I'm including the people who are representing Jones and his business entities at this time, like, everybody involved is incredibly sophisticated about what's going on.
And it's wild to me because these bankruptcy professionals are in their own universe, right?
Like, they're in front of this same small group of judges every day, day in, day out.
They are not playing around with reputations for Alex Jones.
Now, there may be things that Jones does and they have to go in there with egg on their face, but nobody there has any illusions about who Jones is and why he's a problematic debtor.
Everybody gets it.
It's an interesting thing that, yeah, you think, oh man, we've had to spend four years of getting up to speed on exactly how these people operate and whatnot.
The good news is a lot of people who've been involved in that process are still involved in the process.
A lot of the people in that mix.
U.S. trustee knows what's going on.
Judge knows what's going on.
Jones knows what's going on.
Everybody gets it at this point.
It's just a matter of...
There's really two sort of things that rub up against each other in any bankruptcy proceeding.
And it's one is the discovery and declaration and figuring out what the assets actually are.
And two, the creation of a bankruptcy plan that gets the creditors paid in such a way that Jones or any debtor in his position doesn't decide to just say a pox on all your houses, go nuclear.
Yeah, there's a lot of different ways that could go down.
But yeah, exactly.
If this can't get resolved through a bankruptcy, if that can't happen...
Then they would have to get resolved outside of the bankruptcy.
If the bankruptcy gets dismissed or however that ends up wrapping, where there is no discharge of whatever these debts are, then it has to go back into state courts and they've got to resolve those ways through collection.
And none of these options of how the different things could go, none of them are good.
When you're in that route and there's no bankruptcy and you're talking about collecting on verdicts that you've had, you're talking about having sheriffs show up and seize the stuff and sell it at auction.
That's what you're talking about.
Look, you do that, there's no future.
There's no...
If free speech systems is liquidated, that's it.
Jones is going and doing something else.
Jones is not going to create more for free speech systems for you to come take in the future.
In other words, Jones could be in a situation where he could say, I don't care that I am a guy in a barrel of straps as long as everybody's a guy in a barrel of straps.
That doesn't even make any sense because there's assets there.
They can be seized.
Jones would have to do something completely irrational, not for this to somehow resolve in a way of bankruptcy where he is brought to heel.
We haven't talked since that came about, and I don't know.
If you had any, not involvement, but if you watched anything happen with that very clear attempt to create something that was completely separate from Infowars.
You keep seeing things in this bankruptcy that, I'll put it this way, they look really bad.
They look like Jones is doing something to try to defraud his creditors or whatnot.
But it is always in such its infancy and so It's not that there are attorneys who are twirling mustaches and finding ways to scheme and hide his money or something like that.
At this point, he's in a state of desperation on some of these issues because he's just trying to shove money under the mattress wherever he can.
Here's the greatest piece of evidence that we are not in collusion, you and I. You say that you brought it to the attention of the lawyers that Alex was doing this Alex Jones Live thing.
If we had collaborated and I had any pull on this, I would have said, hold off for a second.
As far as the setup goes, like, what I'm hearing from you about the bankruptcy plan is that its idea is to allow Infowars to continue operating so that the business itself can continue paying.
The people of which it owes insurmountable amounts of money, right?
I'm speaking of this in the 50,000-foot view of...
How does this play out in traditional bankruptcy strategy?
Things like that.
In terms of on the ground, what a bankruptcy plan even...
Like, 90% of what's in a bankruptcy plan would be, like, trying to get me to understand a manual on brain surgery.
Like, that's a different language.
Like, I'm not qualified to even have opinions on that, right?
So what...
And even the questions of ultimately what happens to the parties.
Like, how is...
How are...
Because the question is how to best...
Guard the interest of the debtors while at the same time maximizing the recovery of the creditors.
It's supposed to do that.
Often those two things are going to be in conflict and you don't know which one's going to give, right?
So there's so many different ways a bankruptcy plan could be implemented.
And it would depend on also the amount of assets.
And whether some of those are legally exempt and what the parties decide the debts are dischargeable.
Because you have to remember, you're still just talking about Jones and free speech systems in bankruptcy.
There are other entities in the mix, too.
There are fraudulent conveyance lawsuits out there.
This thing is a giant, complicated ball of wax.
And so I have learned that it has now entered a tarot.
I'm a trial lawyer.
I go get a verdict.
I go to the insurance company.
They write me a check.
We're done.
We move on.
But now I realize I've entered a world that is so labyrinthine and arcane and full of weird ceremonies of lawyers spinning in circles three times and shaking hands and putting I don't get it.
Yeah.
And it sucks, but that's how you deal with the intractable problem of you have a rich guy, now how do you get his money?
It's not an insurance company.
The answer is this weird arcane process, which is not good for him.
The thing I've learned as a lawyer, and this case underscores it more than any other perhaps, is that retribution really feels nice when it happens, but it's pretty meaningless for the people who are hurt.
And at the end of the day, it's crass because it's America, so money's the only way we compensate.
Like, that's what compensation is measured and in value.
But, like, there's no question that after everything that these people have gone through, they deserve to not have him profit from it, and they deserve those profits.
And, like, that's, it's just, it's pulling teeth to make that happen, but it will happen.
If there's one thing, again, that I can emphasize, the only thing that I can really state with certainty about the bankruptcy, because so much of it is beyond my pay grade, is that he's not going to be running away with the bags of the money on it.
This is not going to be Alex Jones laughing at the end of it of how well he did.
I think the underlying sense of frustration that might arise from a lot of people...
After seeing this, is that Alex Jones is going to lose a lot of money, but what they may be disturbed by is just how much money some of the people involved in the bankruptcy itself, like those lawyers who now represent him and his entities, how much did they make?
I mean, when you start seeing some of these disclosures, I saw a lawyer who was representing Alex personally.
Did, like, a $500,000 retainer.
I saw there was another one representing Free Speech Systems who had a million dollars in pre-petition conduct.
I just saw a thing about the CRO, the chief restructuring officer that they hired for Infowars LLC, submitted a bill.
And, like, again, hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Like, and we even mock it that much, but, like, even for the bankruptcy purposes and for the CRO, they went and just rented a weird office, an empty office in Victoria, Texas, stuck two desks and a chair in it and said, boom, now that's a company in Victoria.
We're filing the bankruptcy in Southern District of Texas.
And, like, that's not...
Like, if you hear that and you see it portrayed in some movie or something, you're like, this is mass fraud.
Like, you are comically portraying mass fraud by showing an empty rental office in each doctor.
No, this is an absolutely sanctioned and totally kosher practice.
As this goes on and continues longer and longer, I am imagining from your standpoint, it becomes less likely that these other cases like Posner and Fontaine that are on hold are ever going to see court.
Yeah, that is kind of my, but that goes back to my question as far as people that are equipped to handle this, because I feel like that you're elucidating why no one is equipped to handle this.
Because at every step of the way, every one of you assumes someone will make a rational choice.
I will push back on this, though, this idea, like, that Alex at present has say in a lot of things, like, or has control or anything like that, because he really is in a bag right now in any of the financial prison.
Like, you gotta think, if you're Alex Jones...
Do you really want to have every expenditure of dollar you make personally or in your business have to be approved by a group of lawyers in a court?
I mean, the argument against that, though, is that 99% of this world lives in a place where that prison is the happiest, nicest, most wealthy place they've ever existed in.
Look, there's no question that Jones is being allowed to live at a fairly high standard of living, right?
As most debtors in that situation are, but substantially less than what he was.
I mean, he is not...
The tightening of the belt on Jones has been pretty impressive.
Look, there are still some things that...
Look, I saw, for instance, some people were complaining about...
I think it was something like $30,000 a year in housekeeping.
If you pay your housekeeper less than $30,000 a year, if you're the kind of person who has a housekeeper and you pay less than $30,000, I look down on you.
I'm sorry.
If you have a full-time housekeeper and you pay them less, that sucks.
I think things are looking good there on that front.
And then the other thing I wanted to make sure to update you about, because this is kind of big news, I know a lot of the fans have been following the sanctions hearings versus the attorneys, right?
And a complicated explanation, but basically there's a time limit that is running in Heslin, or actually it ran out a few days ago.
For when the court has to enter any final orders after judgment and wrap up the case before it's all kind of set in set with a bow.
And so Judge Gary Gamble issued orders on the sanctions versus Andino Raynell.
Still has the sanctions on Eric Taub, are still sitting out there, and those can be ruled on later.
But she actually sanctioned Andino Raynell to pay the Neil and Scarlett $100,000.
And then if he appeals that order...
To the Court of Appeals and loses, he has to pay another $55,000.
And if he appeals that order to the Texas Supreme Court and loses, then he has to pay another $62,000.
So it's sort of...
And these are all expenses relating to the trial preparation and bankruptcy, the fact that the trial was moved in April from when it was originally...
We kind of know how much he got paid by Alex because he had to file his contract with the bankruptcy court.
So we know that upon retention, he got paid $100,000 for the retention.
And then for the months that he actually represented Alex, for instance, like it was cut off if the bankruptcy, like there was a clause in the contract that said if there's a bankruptcy and Dino's not working basically, then he doesn't get paid.
But then, so when he comes back though, then he gets paid another $100,000 for the month.
So we know that for when he was retained in March, up until April of the bankruptcy, there's $100,000 right there.
And then it comes back and it goes to trial in July, you know, late July to early August.
You can reasonably understand exactly why everyone is furious about that, because it seems as though if you're going to punish somebody, you have to take their entire fee and then punish them.
If I'm sitting there after a trial and I have $100 and you come and you take $50 out of my wallet as a punishment, that's going to be a serious deterrent for me doing that kind of work again.
This is the kind of lawyer who trades on this kind of level.
Taking this kind of hit is not great.
There was some level of me that I thought, man, I don't know how much this court is really going to come after this attorney because, good God, has he suffered in his public image.
I can't think of an attorney who is broader known to a public audience as having made a big screw-up publicly.
I don't know.
The idea that he...
He was the butt of all of those jokes.
That he was all of that.
That there are social media memes of him that will live on forever.
That he's constantly...
People will recognize him from the picture of him and Alex turning around really quick.
You know, I remember talking to a lawyer who was involved in this case, whose name I won't say, who had mentioned that after getting out of the case that they had paid a significant amount of money to try to have search engine optimization.
Look, if you're going to be hiring a criminal defense lawyer of that profile, you're going to be paying...
I mean, he's a guy who wants to go out and charge $800 an hour for his work or something.
You're going to Google that guy before you sign the paperwork, and you're going to have to be comfortable with what you find on Google, and that's going to hurt.
I don't know.
That's a big penalty.
The actual money, it is a big thing.
That's a big hit to have to write that out of your check.
And because in a lot of cases, if you're a lawyer and you get sanctioned, you're usually doing it because you did something on your client's behalf.
And so you can tell your client behind the room, like, hey, you're going to pay this sanction.
You're going to pay me the money to pay this sanction.
He can't do that because Jones is in bankruptcy.
And they'd have to ask the bankruptcy court to let Jones pay for Rayna.
Some of these bankruptcy lawyers are getting paid quite a bit.
But if there had just been one lawyer throughout the whole case, that guy would be the winner or woman, though I can't even imagine a woman representing Alex Jones.
Look, I'm one of them, but maybe it's just that I've lived inside this system long enough to know that the little bits and pieces that you can tear from unconsensual hands is about the only justice you really ever get.
And here, this one ain't bad yet.
Like, you know what I mean?
Like, look, you've got everything that the public trial was meant to do, it did.
And then now you have a situation where Jones has been punished.
Really severely and will eventually – it's going to have to pay a giant ton of money.
But it isn't complete because you're right.
There's all these things that permeate it that are endemic to our system about how people with wealth can operate through it and how the legal profession exists to sort of just skim off the top of that whole process.
It sucks, man.
You're right.
I really, I'm glad to have brought, and now I've gotten, like, I've brought sanctions against two different lawyers who I've got up against the ropes.
So at least they're paying some of that consequence.
But you're right, there's a giant cast of characters here who will shrug this off and move on to their next project.
And it, it's a bigger problem that I'm equipped to handle, but, you know, at least I feel like...
So there's another thing that I wanted to bring up.
You were saying earlier, when I was asking you about the other possible trials, you were saying that it's something that is very important for plaintiffs, especially in this sort of circumstance, to have their day in court and be able to say to Alex's face, like, this is...
This is my experience.
This is the truth of things.
And it was wonderful to be there and see Neil and Scarlett's ability to stand up to him and what have you.
But Alex decided to try and steal that a little bit with his story that he told about Scarlett crying and telling him that he was right about everything.
And recently we discovered an apology video that he put out that you featured prominently in, or a letter that you sent him was featured in this.
And I wanted to ask you about it because this was not something that I felt really got publicized at all.
I'm not saying that's a shortcoming on you or anything, but like...
I pay attention to Alex quite a bit, and it wasn't something that was in the news.
I didn't see anybody tweeting about it.
There wasn't any real coverage of Alex makes a pathetic and sort of backhanded apology retraction video.
I think the people – I think some of the mainstream have like approached a level of thinking that he's pathetic in the aftermath of this, that they're not going to focus any more attention and maybe they found it too granular.
You know, what went on the trial, essentially, was there was a period where Jones went on his show and said, you know what, maybe, I think I was probably wrong about Neil Heslin.
Neil Heslin seems like he was a real person.
And then he says that Neil, he says, well, the reason I was fooled, like, I understand this now because, you know, he's slow.
He's on the spectrum.
He's autistic.
And he's being manipulated by some very bad people.
And he's really slow, but his wife is not.
She's sharp.
And these bad people are manipulating him to say these things.
Because at this point, Scarlett hadn't testified, right?
Is manipulating him to say all these things and all this.
So essentially what the message here is, is that Neil's a dumb guy, has some sort of intellectual disability, and that his evil ex-wife Scarlett has...
Gotten with these evil plaintiff's attorneys and some, I don't know, like some people from Mike Bloomberg's office or, you know, some of those people.
Yeah, and it pissed both my clients off because both Neil and Scarlett, the truth is they're both really sharp.
And for Scarlett, she knew immediately what he was saying.
And for Neil, it was upsetting because, like, I don't know, Neil and Scarlett, they have a great relationship on some level, but all people who are not married, right?
And Neil's like...
The idea that Scarlett's going to manipulate me?
Ridiculous.
Absolutely ridiculous.
Stupid.
Stupidest thing I've ever heard.
I'm not going to let that woman manipulate me.
I'll manipulate her.
And Scarlett was really unlike Mark.
I feel like even now, even now when he's supposedly saying it's real, Neil is real, he can't help himself but say that I'm Deep State.
That I'm...
That's what I am.
It's like, maybe that I'm...
She was like, look, maybe even that I'm a real bum or whatever, but that I'm part of a deep state thing that's manipulating Neil or something.
And she was just so in on it.
And she was like, look, Mark, can I talk about it on the stand?
And I said, look, talk to Wes.
He's in charge of your...
I'm not...
That's between y 'all two.
So her and Wes went and had a conversation about...
Should we play this clip?
And they decided, yeah, we needed to play this because she wants to talk about how she felt about what was said about Neil and how that related to her.
And so it was a good little moment.
Well, Jones takes this and he, in his mind...
He's like, well, look, I said Neil was real.
I said it really happened.
So the lawyers are lying to her.
I said it happened.
So that has to be right.
So there was a point in the trial, of course, where Scarlett went up and handed him a bottle of water after he was coughing through the whole testimony.
And so what Alex now says after the trial is that when Scarlet came up to hand him a bottle of water, that Alex said, you know...
You know, basically like, I hope you watch my video or whatever, and Scarlet was like, yes, I went and saw what you said, and my lawyers lied to me, and you were right, and you were right all along, and like...
No, but so Alex was on Pierce Morgan and said all this stuff.
And so we wrote him a letter saying, hey, everything you said here is false.
You did imply that Scarlett was a deep state person manipulating Neil.
That's what she was pissed about.
That's what she called you out about.
She never went up to you and said any of these things you say she said.
She never did any of that.
And so you need to retract all that.
And under And part of what he needs to do in order to do that is publish a retraction in a manner that's reasonably calculated to reach the next number of people.
So that's why he kept saying, we're making requests to get on Pierce Morgan's show.
No, no, that's actually legally important, and it may become legally important in the future, is that by simply just going on Infowars, you know, now what he can say is...
I can't imagine what they had to do to get him to read this, because they were, I can tell you, the attorneys...
I gave that to him because they were terrified of what I might do.
Because while he's in bankruptcy, the idea of me bringing new suits against him or posing that and even having that hang over his head like a sword of Damocles is pretty nasty.
And they don't like it.
But Alex put them in that position.
So they're like, run out here, do this retraction.
Which, I mean, honestly, I don't even know why they did it.
Because if I'm going to sue him, I don't care about the punitive damages.
Like, why even do it?
But they go out and they do this retraction.
But then Alex probably as a condition of doing it was like, yeah, but I get to say X and Y and Z. Right, right, right.
And it doesn't ever take on head-on what he actually did.
And why she was upset.
And, of course, he doesn't want to have to confront that in the middle of his trial, he tried to say that the person suing him was slow and autistic, and that's why he thought he was a crisis actor and not a real parent.
That's not a great thing you want to keep repeating out loud.
I think, and also, at the time you're hearing that deposition, that deposition, and particularly the last parts of it, are, I think, what really pushed Jones over the edge in hating Chris Maddie.
That deposition is not comfortable and does not go well for Jones.
And he's already had a few uncomfortable depositions by that point.
You're not, you're not giving enough respect to the conflict that he lives in, because he doesn't understand memes, but at the same time, on the streets, they call him the meme machine.
I actually remember him in text messages sending memes of himself or people would send memes of himself to him that all parties involved just abjectly did not understand.
I don't have a lot of experience, so I can't grade it against other ones, but it seemed like this was one of the strangest attempts at what it's trying to be.
Like, as a retraction apology video.
It seemed like it worked against the goal that it was ostensibly trying to present.
I can actually see that on some level of this idea that some of the things that Jones, I thought that he did, he had wound himself up in a way to make this roundabout circular bullshit log to convince himself that he was a good person.
And I no longer believe that.
And part of that is, look, I've read...
So much of his personal communications.
I think Jones knows exactly what a vile person he is.
I think there's a lot of self-loathing there about it.
I think that's true of a lot of people who do some bad stuff.
And people, I don't necessarily believe people are good or bad like that.
I believe that their social patterns and the determinism of their social patterns leads them into these horrible patterns of behavior that they can't escape from anymore.
And that's long gone for Jones.
And I feel like the things he does, some of the things he does, he knows they're wrong.
I think that one of the difficulties is that there is such a thin line between someone psychologically convincing themselves that they're a good person and acting in ways that give the public presentation of insisting that they're a good person.
It would appear very similar, and it's really hard to...
And I almost think it doesn't matter for a psychiatrist.
I think it's actually wild, though, that it kind of speaks to the richness of your subject matter for this podcast, is that y 'all have been doing it for years.
Look, it was five years ago I brought this lawsuit.
And I've spent more time interrogating Alex Jones personally than anybody on the planet.
Nobody has had the amount of time where he has to answer in the ways that he's had to answer than he's had with me.
And here are the three of us all sitting around trying to deduce what's going on with this guy.
And we still don't get it.
There's still more to figure out.
There is still more to analyze.
He is one of the most complicated dumb guys I've ever run across.
Yeah, and I think that there's an element of luck, I think, that we started the show when we did, in as much as, like, we're well up to speed by the time there is now, but, like, I think that history will show him to be, like, a unique figure.
He is a unique figure in American history, for better or worse.
Do you know how many times in this case I have said the words, all that Jones had to do in an X or Y situation was being normal for like 20 or 30 minutes, and he can't do it.
Really understand the vibe of Alex Jones 2016 to 2018 and what he was in this country and the effect that he plays.
Because whatever you might want to say for his audience right now, it is not that.
He does not have that cultural influence footprint, any of those things.
There's something like, again, I hate to use the word like this, but he's like zeitgeisty for 2016-2018.
And he was at the height of it.
There could have been a lot of things I could have taken on at that point in my career, but seeing that opportunity, I was like, this guy's unique, and if you do damage to him, you actually do something.
You change trajectories and stuff.
Maybe we did.
I don't know.
I know he's not at the height of his powers, but I know we defamed him.
Normally when I'm on the show, I'm like a comic doing plugs.
We've got a hearing coming up on this date.
Make sure to tune in.
There's nothing.
Everything's dead in the water in the state courts right now because everything's in the bankruptcy courts.
I don't...
Look, you can call in and tune in and listen to those bankruptcy hearings if you really want to, but spare yourself the pain, and I'll do a shout-out here to Morgan Stringer on Twitter.
Yeah, of course.
If there's anything going on in those courts, she's going to thread it and you're going to find out about it.