Human rights journalist Sian Norris reveals how far-right groups like the UK’s Center for Bioethical Research and Patriotic Alternative spread extremist anti-abortion ideologies through "laundered" networks—Citizen Go (Spain), Alliance Defending Freedom (U.S.), and even Betsy DeVos’ Dutch Reformed Church—funded by billionaires like the Princes family to undermine global reproductive rights, targeting countries like Kenya with Western-framed attacks. Despite 53 nations expanding abortion access since 1973, U.S. rollbacks post-Dobbs (2022) exposed underrated threats from white supremacist movements exploiting economic and racial anxieties, like the 2008 crash, to rally support by scapegoating marginalized groups over systemic critiques. Her book Bodies Under Siege, pre-ordering June 6 via Verso Books, argues for unifying advocacy—prioritizing healthcare narratives over fear—to counter backlash, as seen in Ireland’s 2018 referendum and Northern Ireland’s decriminalization. [Automatically generated summary]
So my bright spot today has been that my best friend was staying with me this week and I hadn't seen her for a couple of months because she lives in France and I live in the UK.
So it's been a really lovely week of like friendship and sisterhood and drinking probably too much wine and having really nice food.
I swear to you, I wear the same clothes every day.
The only expression I have now is just socks.
That's it.
Ironic socks is my bright spot.
So, Sean, I wanted to start by giving people a little bit of background on you.
If I understand correctly, you started more as a fiction writer, short fiction, and the like, and then became a human rights journalist traveling around the world kicking ass.
I'd like to think of myself as a fiction and short fiction writer, but to be honest, I didn't have that much fiction published.
I had a few short stories published, and as many journalists and writers are, I'm constantly trying to finish that novel that will become a huge blockbuster hit one day.
But I think I was always really interested in writing and telling stories, and I really wanted to do that in whatever form it took.
And I think alongside my background writing fiction, Was also this background in feminist activism and human rights activism, particularly on women's rights, abortion rights, obviously, and LGBTQ plus people's rights.
And so that really kind of led me to sort of bring those two skills and passions together.
How do I talk about the issues facing women and marginalized people?
And how can I use my skills as a writer?
And that leads you to human rights journalism.
And so for the past couple of years, I've been a staff writer on an independent paper in the UK.
I've recently gone back to freelancing, which is definitely my happier place.
I much prefer freelancing and having that extra bit of freedom.
And yeah, and it's just sort of reported on human rights and women's issues from Bangladesh, from Kenya, from Romania, from the U.S., looking from the U.K., if that makes sense, haven't actually been on the ground in the U.S. Don't worry about it.
So, one of the interesting things that I noticed on that front is that with your short fiction, it is far more rhythmic.
In terms of your structure, your sentencing, all of those things.
Whereas when I read this book, it is, I don't know, I would almost describe it as a hammer.
You know, this book starts and it keeps driving the point, the point, the point, you know, like that kind of thing.
Why, do you feel like there's a deliberate choice to, I mean, obviously there's a deliberate choice between the two, but do you feel more comfortable in one or the other?
I don't know if it's necessarily feeling more comfortable.
It's just that they require really different styles.
So I think what I wanted to achieve with this book was a couple of things in terms of form and structure.
One, to get across the urgency.
I mean, obviously, we're in a slightly different place now because of the overruling of Roe and the success of the Dobbs case in the US.
But when I started writing this book, a lot of people didn't really take it very seriously when I was saying, you know, there's a real threat to abortion rights.
This threat to abortion rights is coming from white supremacy and white male supremacy in particular.
So I was very much like, I have to get this across.
I have to really be urgent.
I have to really, as you say, hammer home what is going on and why this is an issue.
And I wanted to be really, really clear and make my points really clear.
Particularly so that it wasn't just speaking to someone, like not speaking to myself, like, oh, I know these issues because I've been buried in them and researching them and reporting on them for a really long time.
So how do I really open it up and make sure that someone not as engaged, although I think people who read the book are going to be somewhat engaged in women's rights issues.
Unless they're into Steven Seagal and they pick it up by mistake.
Well, I mean, the last interview I did was with Jeff Charlotte, and his book was written, I mean, obviously it's different because it's written from a man, and it's talking about very, very similar issues from a different lens.
And from his creative writing background, you know, or creative nonfiction background, you can definitely see how he's trying to craft these stories.
Within the story, in order to kind of do a little...
I mean, I'm not belittling here, but it's an entertaining book in that way.
And then, like I said, from your point of view, from your perspective here, this is not entertainment.
This is a fucking emergency, you know?
We gotta start riots, is the way that I felt from that.
I think as well, there's points in the book where I do try and kind of create...
Or paint a picture of what was going on.
For example, there's a section on the January the 6th insurrection and I try and go into what it was like, what it looked like from watching it on the news in the UK.
But at the same time, I wrote most of the book during the pandemic and in the lockdowns, which meant there wasn't a lot of opportunity to go anywhere.
There was a point when I went to North Bristol and I was like, wow, it's like the furthest I've been from my house for months.
So I think there was that kind of...
You know, there was a potential to sort of, in another time, to have gone to different places and described what I was seeing and kind of embedded myself more in communities and movements.
But because of the restrictions of the pandemic, it just wasn't a possibility.
I think that even from that perspective, and that's what I want to get into next about the book, is you start off by kind of listing out the main characters.
Because when we are talking about...
So our show, I know you have no idea who we are, which is fine.
We cover Alex Jones of Infowars exclusively for way too long.
And our character lens is going to be through that.
And you were talking more about a global...
I don't want to say conspiracy, but a grouping of different people who are interested in restricting women's rights in different places around the globe.
So I wanted to give you an opportunity to kind of give some of those greatest hits as far as Kenya, the organizations there.
So the sort of, I mean, if I go back a couple of steps, the way that I looked at...
This research and the way I wanted to structure the book was to show that there is a pipeline between extremist anti-abortion ideas that kind of fester and ferment in, you know, very dark spaces, you know, far-right neo-Nazi groups and extremist anti-abortion groups.
So in the UK...
I mentioned organizations like Patriotic Alternative, which is a far-right group based here, and the Center for Bioethical Research UK, which is a branch of a US organization.
And it's a very small group, but it's a very extreme anti-abortion group in the UK.
Yeah, they've got such a benign name, and yet their actions are really, really extreme.
And, you know, they've become very well known for displaying very unpleasant and graphic abortion imagery outside MPs, constituency offices, and also outside clinics and things like that.
And then I kind of look at the sort of more mainstream...
Organisations, which I kind of think of as the next stage in this pipeline.
So you get this sort of extremist ideology and then it's laundered by more mainstream groups who can go to the UN, who go to the European Courts of Human Rights, who take amicus briefs to the Supreme Court in the US.
So these are people like Citizen Go.
Which is a Spanish organization, Alliance Defending Freedom, which I'm sure US listeners will be really familiar with.
They're very influential and very influential on the whole Roe debate.
And then from there, these organisations kind of take the extreme anti-abortion ideology, clean it up, put it in a PowerPoint presentation, which shows share while wearing a suit, and it goes into politicians.
And the politicians then kind of enact a lot of these policies in terms of restricting abortion rights or pushing really anti-immigration policies and saying that the way to resolve things like demographic winters or so-called demographic crises is to restrict women's reproductive freedoms.
So that's when we look at places like Hungary in Europe, Poland, obviously, which has a very strict anti-abortion ban, and also issues in the UK as well.
So yeah, so I guess some of the organisations that I really focus on, you mentioned in Kenya, I've done a lot of work on this organisation called Citizen Go, which, as I said, is a Spanish group.
And their sort of modus operandi is to get people to sign petitions, which...
Focus on a whole range of sort of anti-gender initiatives.
I mean, it's a really random selection.
Everything from, you know, Ray versus Wade to a Netflix show that's got a gay character in it.
Well, this is where I get really angry about it all.
One of the sort of things that Citizen Go has done in Kenya is it's got a representative in Kenya.
She's a Kenyan woman.
And, you know, she's addressed the United Nations about abortion rights in the country and LGBT rights.
And they argue that abortion and LGBTQ plus people's rights are like a Western imposition on traditional Kenyan values and traditional African values.
And of course, this completely ignores the fact that Citizen Go is a Spanish-European organization imposing its ideology and its motivations on Kenya.
And when I was in Kenya last year, you know, I was talking to a gynecologist who's quite high up in the sort of medical profession over there.
And he was saying, we've always had abortion in Kenya.
Abortion is traditional in Kenya.
So the idea that these Global North organizations can go into the Global South and try and spread their ideology and spread their ideas and then claim somehow that they're, you know, presenting true African values is really offensive.
And it's offensive to the amazing, you know, pro-abortion activists who are working really hard in Kenya and in other parts of sub-Saharan Africa.
And of course, Citizen Go also very active in Latin America and the kind of very close to the Spanish far-right party vox.
And I think in terms of particularly we're seeing a massive backlash against LGBT rights in East Africa at the moment.
And, you know, a lot of the laws that we see against LGBT people are really rooted in those colonialist era laws from, you know, the 1800s and when Britain was going stomping around the place, telling everyone how to live their lives and how to behave.
I'm looking at Windows trying to install a new version and I'm saying no all the time, so I don't know, maybe I'm on the wrong side of history here.
That is entirely possible.
I do want to throw in something that is...
Very almost kind of insidious here is that a lot of religious organizations that you talk about in the book present themselves in the United States and in the UK as one thing.
And then when you see their behavior in other countries, it is, I mean, disgusting.
So can you, like, as I was saying, like the Dutch Reformed Church, was it?
And, I mean, she was education secretary at a time when, from anyone could see, the administration was really going after so-called wokery in schools.
A backlash against positive representations of LGBT people, a backlash against any materials that talk about Black history, talk about the enslavement of people in America and African American people.
And obviously she also put in her firing line the protections for sexual harassment for school children.
So there was a lot of reactionary activity going on from Betsy DeVos when she was Education Secretary.
And then when you look at the The sort of background of her and her family, you start to see, okay, well, she was part of this thing called the Dutch Reformed Church, which is a very reactionary church, very anti-abortion, very anti-LGBT.
Her foundation that she runs with her husband funds anti-gender organising, anti-gender campaigning all across the world, as does the foundation that is linked to her family, the Prince family.
So her maiden name is Prince.
And I think this is when it gets really interesting.
But it gets really interesting how all of these families are so connected and these funding streams become very connected and they're coming from this really shared ideology and how they use that money from all sorts of different...
Sources of wealth to try and influence abortion rights all around the world.
So I think it's really concerning that these, again, really just very, very wealthy individuals have taken on this ideology and are trying to import it and force the ideology onto more, I mean, I don't like the word more vulnerable populations, but that is kind of the terminology we use, I guess.
So ones that might not have the same health infrastructure or the same...
Well, I mean, you know, it's hard not to say vulnerable when the reason for the vulnerability is because they've been denied so much by the people who are also destroying them now.
So it's not as though it's vulnerability, it's fucking trauma.
Throughout that entire time.
And that's why there was a line that I really, really appreciated, which was, without access to reproductive rights, women can never be free.
Which is a good line.
But I was wanting to ask you, what does that freedom actually look like?
Do you know what I mean?
Right now, I would argue that the vast majority of human beings on this planet believe in some form of restricting women's reproductive rights one way or the other.
So how is it that we see that actual freedom for reproductive rights?
So to me, that freedom is sort of about reproductive justice.
So the idea is that when we have reproductive rights or reproductive justice and women can be free, and that means that we have the choice to control our own fertility, the choice to end a pregnancy that we don't want to have.
The choice to continue a pregnancy that we do want to have, and then when that baby is born, that wanted baby, we can have access to secure housing, to education, to social welfare, to work, and for that work to be flexible and to be supportive of the family that you want to have.
And I think that's a really important aspect of women's freedom.
It's not just about saying, oh, you have a right to abortion.
It's also about saying that you have the right to the families that you want and the support that needs to be in place for you to achieve that.
And I think fundamentally, you know, I say that we can't be free unless we have reproductive rights.
It's because the driving force behind the anti-abortion movement is to control women and to control women's bodies and to put women's bodies...
To work, to exploit us for reproductive labour.
And as long as we're saying that that is possible for someone else to control and own our bodies, then we can never be free.
And when we say that actually I get to decide what happens to my body, and again, that expands beyond just having an abortion that can be who I want to have sex with, how I want to have sex with that person, whether I want to have a baby at all.
It's like when we give up that space, when that right is taken away from us.
I mean, I feel like our society, when I'm reading through your book, it is hard not to continually make these connections that basically our entire culture is in some form or another based around commodification of women's bodies, control of women's bodies.
I was thinking, You know, we've often described sex work as the oldest profession.
And the more I think about it, the more I think that is the entire basis for capitalism.
Selling women's bodies in one way or another without their consent or control.
So, in essence, if we want to have full reproductive rights, it has to be the entire system that goes.
Interesting things to look at is Silvia Federici's work, and she wrote this book called Caliban and the Witch, which looks at the links between reproductive rights or reproductive exploitation and the roots of capitalism.
And reading that book was just such a lightbulb moment for me.
It was like one of those moments where you're like, oh, okay, this all makes sense.
Yeah, and it's absolutely about that, this idea that women's bodies are put to work in order to create the next generation of workers.
So women's bodies need to be constantly reproducing, otherwise the capitalist system collapses.
And there's really interesting stuff both in Federici's work and in Angela Davis's work about how that links to the enslavement of African-American people and how black women who are enslaved, you know, if they ended a pregnancy, That wasn't seen as her having an abortion or anything to do with her body.
That was seen as her stealing from the enslaver.
And so as soon as you sort of, these connections are suddenly like, okay, because that's what women's bodies are for in this society.
And to deny that, to say, actually, I'm not going to play a part in that.
Actually, I want to have control over my own body.
I don't see myself as a reproductive vessel.
It's like, whoa, that is too much.
You cannot have that.
That is women's freedom, and that allows freedom for everyone, and so it has to be stopped.
They're also miserably unhappy all the time, and they blame their inability to control women's bodies for that misery, but it wouldn't make them happy.
Do you know what I mean?
Even if there was control, even if they had complete control, it would only be a different form of misery.
How is it that that is so constantly exploited by people who are only benefited by it?
But I think, yeah, the interesting thing about the incels and the reason I included them in the book is Because they represent this idea of white male supremacy and the belief that women's bodies need to be exploited for reproduction in order to defeat this so-called great replacement, which is a far-right conspiracy.
I'm sure your listeners know.
Oh, boy, how do you do that?
Yeah, exactly.
And so that was kind of the interesting aspect I found in the incel movement was how they were replicating this great replacement conspiracy theory and melding that with their desire to control women's bodies.
You know, there were people who were going, oh, in the perfect society, all men will be guaranteed a wife.
And back in the past, you know, women knew their place and it was to be married and to have babies together.
And then obviously the kind of usual disgusting incel stuff where they talk about what they do to women's bodies.
But yeah, I think you're right.
It's like, I mean, one of the, I wrote an article at the turn of this year about how the incels really don't like Andrew Tate, who's this kind of, Man who's just been arrested at that time in December in Romania.
But what I thought was interesting was that they position Andrew Tate as someone who exploits men like them, as in men who are incels, because he promises them this lifestyle where they can get women and they can, you know, game women into having sex with them.
But actually, and then, but he's doing it by asking them for money and asking them to like give him money.
And then he will teach them how to get women.
And so they actually see him as this really bad character because he's exploiting them.
And, you know, there's a lot of really disturbing trends as a result of that, in terms of their obsession with, you know, very, very young girls, because at least they're not...
You know, they haven't been corrupted by womanhood.
And I think it's a really, yes, I think it's very tempting sometimes not to take himself seriously because they are just so awful.
But actually, some of the things they say and do does require some kind of analysis.
But I think that's interesting as well, because one of the points that I make in the book is when abortion was banned in the States in the 1860s, it was coming from a position of anxiety about women's political empowerment and rising rates of immigration.
And this is where we are now.
You know, the panic around abortion rights is coming from this great replacement conspiracy theory, which we hear parroted by mainstream politicians now.
And, you know, women's political empowerment.
This is like post-Me Too.
Women are supposed to be doing better than ever.
And yet, suddenly, so now it's like, oh, shit, we've got to take her rights away.
We've got to have this backlash.
And we've seen that throughout history in Weimar Germany, pre-sort of...
The Nazi era in early 20th century Italy before fascism, women's empowerment growing, immigration becoming higher up the agenda, and then bam, we ban abortion rights.
So I think in terms of where it comes from, it's kind of like the ways in which political narratives take hold on these sort of intersecting issues around race, gender, sex and immigration in order to Kind of ferment insecurity and fuel anger and fuel resentment, which then allows for this backlash to happen.
And so it's that kind of meeting point between the activists and the politicians and the funders that creates this whirlpool of hate and anger.
But yeah, whether that starts with a politician who stands up going, we've got a problem with immigration and there's a low birth rate, or whether it starts with the guy online going...
I'm really, there's a massive replacement and women are aiding it because of all of their abortions.
It's the same thing, it's just a different way of phrasing it.
Well, I mean, you know, it is like they wouldn't be able to exploit the anxiety people have over being replaced if there wasn't anxiety people have over being replaced.
And they wouldn't be able to create that anxiety whole cloth unless there was already anxiety there.
So at the end of the day, the problem is everybody's fucking anxious all the goddamn time because nobody knows what's going to happen.
I mean, it was, you know, I feel very strongly that we don't talk enough about the crash and its impact because it's helped shape so much of UK politics and, you know, politics across the region.
And if you say it created this anxiety...
That was then filled with bad actors going, oh, well, the real reason you're anxious is because women have gained some rights.
And the real reason you're anxious is because there's too many immigrants coming in.
And the real reason you're anxious is because of Black Lives Matter and drag queens telling stories in libraries.
And it builds and builds and builds.
And then politicians who want to hold on to power exploit all of that.
So, I mean, I think a lot of people reach for the really obvious message that, like, patriarchy hurts men too, and, you know, capitalism hurts all of us.
But I think we need to, like, start putting forward...
And I'm always like, yeah, patriarchy does hurt men too, but also men benefit from patriarchy, and that's why we've got it.
Like, you know, two things can be true at once.
So I think we just need to, like...
And I felt like this, Going back to 2016, when it was the referendum in the UK over Brexit, the Remain campaign, which I voted for, came out with such negative messaging.
It was all just like, if you vote for Brexit, the whole economy is going to collapse and everything will be terrible.
And they were right.
But there was no sort of positive vision for what remaining in the EU would look like.
There was no sense of like, if I vote Remain, it's going to create a stronger Europe.
I'm going to have access to...
Even if they just said...
Vote to remain in the EU and you won't have to queue at the airport anymore.
Just like a positive vision.
And I think that's what we really need to start doing for women's rights and human rights across the board.
So one of the really exciting things that happened last, I think it was last year.
There was a referendum in Hungary about LGBTQ plus rights.
And the pro-LGBTQ campaign went out and they told really positive stories about gay people's lives or LGBTQ people's lives.
And they spoke about how your friend or your son or your daughter or your auntie could be gay.
It was like, we're a community.
We're in your community.
We are all part of this.
And they won.
The referendum, the result that the government wanted didn't happen.
Didn't happen.
The government failed to enact some of the repressive legislation that they wanted to enact.
They obviously have put in some other things.
And I think going out with that really positive message gave people a reason to vote in favour because they're like, yeah, actually, my next door neighbour is gay and I really like him and we have a really great time and we both talk about our dogs as opposed to always going, everything's terrible, everything's terrible, things are going to get worse, things are going to get worse.
And it was one of the things that There was a film called Yes, which was about the Chilean referendum.
And that was the sort of message of that film of like, show what a positive difference can be made if you believe in human rights and you support human rights.
You know, women won't be dying.
You'll have healthy families, happy communities.
the people that you love will be better cared for and have better mental health and will have stronger economies and all of these things can happen.
But I think, and for understandable reasons, we can be very negative because Things are very, very bad right now.
But if we're going to win, we need to start showing what winning means and what change could look like.
When you say things are really, really bad right now, you are 100% correct.
But I find it hard not to go through your entire book and see that there's an almost unspoken thing that is alluded to throughout the entire thing, which is, I would say that part of all of this, and maybe the largest part, is the structure and the system and the male...
Monopoly on violence, on physical, actual violence, and that there's really, I mean, no strategy to deal with that.
So, is it something, honestly, where it should be, should we find a way to lessen their ability to?
Uh, commit violence or, honestly, I mean, it's terrifying and what you wrote in the book makes me feel like maybe I should start learning how to use a gun.
Do you know what I mean?
Like, this is, this is real shit.
You wrote a hammer and you have to take responsibility for making me want to get a hammer.
In terms of men's violence against women, I mean, obviously, that underpins gender inequality.
Again, we can't be equal, we can't be free, so long as men use violence against women to control and subdue women.
But I think, again, it's about making that case for why women's rights are important.
We know that...
The more equality women can get, the more we have gender equality, the more we can impact and reduce the levels of male violence.
Because women are respected and seen as human and seen as having equal value to men, and so there's no reason to be violent towards us.
And I think, again, it's about really striving to see women's rights as something that is positive for society and positive for men as well.
Because, yeah, like, it doesn't have to be this way.
And, you know, men's violence is a sort of tool of patriarchy, and patriarchy is so linked to capitalism.
But if we fight for a fairer, more equal society, you don't need to keep control through violent means, because there isn't that need for control in the first place.
That makes me go, I mean, see that lessening violence kind of thing, and...
That it is part of the patriarchy.
The story you tell of doctors letting a woman die of sepsis because of an abortion ban, that immediately brought me to the Milgram experiment, if that makes sense.
How is it possible for a doctor to watch someone die just because an authority says that's what you have to do?
It's a passive version of continuing to increase that voltage.
Yeah, so the cases that I write about in the book obviously happened in Poland, where we've got a very strict abortion ban.
And obviously there was the case in Ireland in 2012 when Savita died.
And then obviously around the world, thousands of women die as a result of unsafe abortion or not having access to safe abortion.
I think what's...
So disturbing.
And this is, you know, the stuff about Poland and Sovita is really a message to the United States, because this is coming to your doors.
Like, women will die as a result of Dobbs.
And the reason they will die is because you have told doctors that they will go to prison if they act.
And so you have doctors who, you know, want to help women.
They want to do the things that they used to do.
They want to perform surgical abortions that will save women's lives.
But if you're constantly being told that that could result in you going to prison for life, and you think there's a teeny tiny chance that this woman will pull through and abort the fetus naturally, then of course you're going to keep holding and holding and holding until there's no options left.
You need a mass movement of medical professionals to say that they're not going to comply with the law.
And I think the really scary thing about...
That I've seen coming out of the anti-abortion movement in the US is they're already preparing for when the women start to die by saying, oh, well, the law allows the doctors to intervene.
And if the doctor doesn't intervene, and that's the doctor's fault.
And it's like, no, the law is really murky.
The laws are not clear.
There's not a moment in the law where it's only like, oh, now you can intervene and everybody will agree that this was the moment.
So by creating these bad laws...
And failing to recognise the medical realities of women's bodies and not respecting doctors' expertise, this is what happens.
This is the result of those bans.
And I remember really just thinking when the woman in Poland died, because she was the same age as me when she died, and I just kept coming back to that.
I was like, you're the same age as me and you've died because you weren't allowed to have a surgical abortion that would have saved your life.
The horror of it is...
I still really, really feel the horror of that news story and what the woman's mother said and the video of her.
It was just a really horrifying...
I don't even want to say tragedy because it's not a tragedy when it's deliberate.
The women and their families need to be prioritised.
And I think one of the things that makes me so particularly angry about what's happening in the States is when in 2012 Savita Halapavena died, that was a trigger for change in Ireland.
It was like, OK, this cannot happen again.
We cannot keep going through this.
Something is going to change.
And, you know, six years later, they overturned the abortion ban and now there's safe legal abortion in Ireland.
I think what happened with the Polish deaths and what will happen when women start to die in the US is this is the start.
This is the start of the process.
There's no change coming.
This isn't the end of something bad.
This is the beginning of something that is going to get worse and worse.
There are some cases going through in the States right now of women, you know, taking action against incidents when they've been denied abortion care in life-threatening situations.
And hopefully, if nothing else, that will start raising the alarm, you know, forcing people to take action and maybe overturning some of these bans.
Yeah, I mean, I guess I'm advocating for there not to be any abortion bans.
Like, my position is that abortion is healthcare, and therefore it should be regulated as healthcare.
You know, in Britain, abortion is still governed by criminal law, which is completely, you know, inappropriate.
And as long as we see abortion as something that's around a moral issue or a criminal issue, it's always going to be vulnerable to these kinds of bans and these kinds of restrictions.
But as long as if we start talking about abortion as health care and valuing it as women's access to health care, then we can start to have real change.
which I know that it's very regular, but there is nothing funnier to me than weird old men wearing wigs and robes arguing about whether or not abortion should be legal.
So I'm sorry that the justice system in...
Britain is so silly.
I find it insane that we've given nine people wearing moo-moos almost infinite power forever.
That seems a little bit crazy, and nobody's just talking about how stupid that is.
Like, on a fundamental level, there are 300-odd million people here, and we're letting nine assholes take the future.
You know, across the pond, it does seem like a really weird system, but then I say that coming from a legislature where someone wearing a big black robe bangs on the Parliament's doors with a big stick at the beginning of every year.
unidentified
And not just that, but the Queen helps make your laws still.
So, yeah, I mean, it's a very, I find the Supreme Court system very odd.
And it's clearly up for abuse.
That's what we can see.
If you have political appointments in the judiciary, that is open to abuse.
And that's what we're seeing in different legislatures around Europe as well.
I think there's a sort of feeling that it's only in the US, but actually political appointments in the Supreme Courts in different European countries is also having profound implications on people's rights.
For this time period, it's like, we have one goal and we're going to unify and we're going to go after it.
And, you know, it was never a given that the yes side would win the referendum.
It was always felt very touch and go.
The no side, so the ones who wanted to keep the Eighth Amendment, the ones who wanted to keep the abortion ban.
Went at it with everything, you know, just very, very vicious campaigning, very graphic campaigning, you know, US actors coming into Ireland to sort of spread the anti-abortion message.
And what worked was telling women's stories and championing women's and, you know, women and pregnant people's experiences and refusing to say, refusing to compromise on it.
And now Ireland has...
More, you know, as a liberal abortion laws.
Similarly, in the UK, we've seen progress in that abortion was finally decriminalised in Northern Ireland.
So Northern Ireland was not covered by the 1967 Abortion Act, which allowed for abortion in certain circumstances in the rest of the UK.
And it took a lot of political campaigning and, you know, some problematic political campaigning to get it decriminalised in Northern Ireland.
And then in Britain, we've had buffer zones implemented so people can no longer go and harass women outside of clinics.
We've had changes to the law that allow women to take abortion pills at home.
So we have seen positive progress on abortion rights in our little corner of Europe.
And I think one of the messages of Roe as well was that while it's been a disaster for the US...
And has emboldened the anti-abortion movement around the world.
It's also kind of put some fire into the pro-abortion movement in that, you know, other nations have been like, okay, we need to actually do some more to protect abortion rights in our own constitutions.
And when I reported on Roe being overruled back in last year, I spoke to Leah Hochter from the Centre for Reproductive Rights.
And she was like, look, this is really terrible.
But one thing to remember is that since 1973, I think 53 countries have improved access to abortion and only four countries have rolled it back.
So, you know, progress is happening and that comes from, again, being really vocal by demanding abortion as healthcare, by not compromising, by saying that women's lives matter and women's bodies matter and women's health matters.
And that women's freedom matters.
And I think, yeah, there is optimism to be had, even though we're going through a real backlash.
Yeah, so I think what you're saying is that the political strategy should be like, hey, we're done arguing with each other for a little bit, and let's just go fucking hard on this issue.
Unite for at least a day to do this thing.
You know, let's just focus on one fucking thing for once in our lives instead of changing the narrative every week.