Today, Dan and Jordan dip into the past to see what Alex was up to. In this installment, Alex gets super racist, endorses apartheid, and reports that the government will soon impose limitations on how many kids people can have.
So, Jordan, today, I was very much intending to get a Modern Day episode together, and I spent a fair amount of time going down that road, but I ran into an issue where I was just like, this isn't an episode.
I was just like, I don't know.
And so, I threw out what I had planned, and I'm like, it's my birthday weekend, I don't give a fuck, I'm staying in the past.
So I was going to do a 2004 episode, and that is what we're doing.
We've got Casey Nethercott, the owner of the ranch in southern Arizona, who has been in the middle of multiple attacks by Mexican troops that have been written up in the Associated Press.
They have apprehended a lot of illegal aliens on their property.
He was arrested by the FBI.
And he's now been released.
They tried to force him to sign confessions.
Just wait until you hear the details of this in the middle of the next hour.
We've also got a bunch of other guests who are lining up.
I have no idea what's going on there, like in the present day, present day.
But whatever the case is, it doesn't change that in 2004, Casey was a dangerous armed felon who believed that he could take the law into his own hands to dispense vigilante justice against immigrants and high school students he probably thought were immigrants.
In the meantime, you knew it would come to the United States.
A restriction on how many children you can have.
The government has been saying they want to do it for a while.
Of course, if you're a third-world internal population, you'll be given waivers, but for everybody else, there'll be restrictions.
We'll be getting into that.
Also, you may have heard of this.
U.S. soccer team hears Osama chants in Mexico during the Star-Spangled Banner.
And I want to point out that he's the people that Bush wants to allow into the country, the people he wants to legalize, the people whose government says the Southwest belongs to them.
Chanting, Usama, Usama, Usama.
So, the radical Mexicans, Osama Bin Laden, and George Bush together in their hate of American national sovereignty.
So these people are kind of being assholes, but I don't think it's indicative of the whole crowd, nor of Mexican people as a group, like Alex seems to think.
Alex is making that leap because his editorial position is to use whatever imagery he can to demonize immigrants, particularly those entering from the southern border, and this allows him to tie all Mexican folk to Osama Bin Laden.
I don't know if people can hear beeping in the background, but if they can, it's because there's some construction outside, so enjoy that little bit of flavor of spice of life, as they say.
You could probably get the vibe from that clip that we might be in for some anti-Mexico business.
Bush supports total blanket amnesty, despite the fact that it's unconstitutional, that the majority of voters...
Are against it.
And Bush supports a country, a people, who, a large portion of them, and the government itself, say openly that they are going to kill all the white people.
Kill us!
They won't even allow a Fourth of July parade in San Diego or L.A. We've got video of them beating Hispanics, blacks, whites, veterans.
With two-by-fours, the police stand by and let it happen.
This has been going on three separate times in the last six years.
We have video of it.
But again, it's not a national news story.
Can you imagine a group of white people went to a Mexican get-together?
So Bush was absolutely not in favor of blanket amnesty, and nothing he ever did while in office came close to such a policy.
White nationalists call any kind of making immigration or pleading refugee status the same as blanket amnesty, because in reality, they want no non-white immigration.
Alex is essentially on the same page as that, but his public brand doesn't really allow him to argue that way, so this is what you get.
Neither Mexico's government nor a majority of their population want to kill white people.
I've not seen any of this alleged footage of the 4th of July parades being attacked, but if this is a real thing, I would assume that it's wildly out of context and the violence is about something else entirely different than Mexican people being mad at U.S. patriotism.
Yeah.
unidentified
The purpose of this storyline is to ram into the audience's head that non-whites are completely committing violent crimes against white people.
And because they're not white, the media covers it up.
This is literally the same rhetoric that the council of conservative citizens promoted, which Dylan roof cited as the inspiration for his mass murder at, Alex is swimming in those exact same waters here.
Metro won't disavow document calling for recapture of Southwest.
A Latino student group that drew attention during the California gubernatorial campaign of Cruz Bustamante says it will not disavow a founding document outlining the aim of recapturing the Southwestern United States for Mexico.
Yeah, on some of their websites, they've got images of dead white people and how they're going to kill us.
Responding to an allegation of racism, an allegation?
Members of Mecha chapter of the University of California at Los Angeles showed up in force in an undergraduate student government meeting Tuesday to protest the campus student paper.
The UCLA reported the GOP student group, UCLA, Bruin Republicans have challenged Mecha and denounced a founding document, El Plan de Aslan, which they assert promotes violence and damages the organization's reputation as community servants.
The text calls for the return of the U.S. Southwest to Mexico through members said they do not follow the particular ideology.
That's a total lie.
My wife speaks French, Spanish, Italian, and just a couple weeks ago we were in a convenience store.
And there's two Mexicans, one at the counter, one buying something, one running the counter, and it's speaking in Spanish saying, yeah, I don't like speaking English.
I don't like that dumb language.
I don't like whites.
They're sitting there laughing at us.
I'm just standing over my wife.
I mean, you know, oh, but that's cute and acceptable and funny.
But if it did, I still struggle to see how it's a meaningful anecdote to inject here.
Alex is trying to assert that Mecha, a Hispanic student organization, follows the ideology of this Aztlan document, which seeks to recapture the Southwest.
How does him and his wife overhearing a guy say that he doesn't like English and white people help make that point?
It doesn't.
But it probably feels like it does to the audience, because Alex's complaint about Mecha isn't the point.
There's something behind that story that is the more important message Alex is trying to get to the audience, which is that Mexican people and non-whites in general are a dangerous threat to you.
Alex doesn't feel the need to defend his assertion that this group that follows the Aztlan plan, that's just taken as proven because he said it.
When Alex adds the anecdote about his wife at the convenience store, what he's doing is seeking to reinforce the feeling that Mexican people are a threat to you and secretly hate you.
When they think you can't understand what they're saying, they speak of their hate of white people in Spanish.
When you look at it through this lens and with this understanding, it makes total sense why this is the story Alex's mind goes to when he's trying to make his point here.
It makes no sense if it's an attempt to prove his Mecha point, but it's exactly what you'd do if you were trying to heighten the racist fears that you're trying to stoke.
This Aztlan document was drafted by the First Nationals Chicano Youth Liberation Conference in 1969, and there's a fair amount of language in it that does encourage Chicano nationalism and reclaiming the land of their forefathers.
Groups like Mecha don't expressly follow this document, though the A in Mecha does stand for Aztlan, but that's not weird since it's a fabled ancestral homeland of Aztec people.
I don't get the rebuttal to, like, our country has a shame stain, let's say, because of our history of slavery and the racist systems that were enacted in the aftermath of slavery, the way that people were kept out of their ability to participate in the economy and were attacked.
So, to be entirely clear up front, there was some, and has been some fairly reliable reporting, that there were gangs in Zimbabwe that were using threats of rape as a tool in robberies, and in some cases following through with it.
It is claimed by outlets like WorldNetDaily that these attacks were only targeted at whites, but I don't think that there's a good reason to trust them, and it's unclear to me if this was actually the case.
These people who were committing these acts are horrible and should face the full punishment available under the law, full stop.
What I want to talk about, however, is the way that Alex is using this story to claim that things were better back when Zimbabwe was Rhodesia, back when the country was under a brutal apartheid system.
This is not a position that takes the problem that he's pretending to cover seriously.
Returning to a genocidal regime is not the solution to crime, unless you really believe that the apartheid state and all its human rights abuses were for the greater good.
In order for Alex to really believe what he's saying, he needs to think that the black population of Rhodesia needed to be kept in line by what amounted to a very severe police state, which he shouldn't believe.
Well, I actually think that it's slightly different.
It's partially that, but also I think for Alex, there might even be an element of civilizing is not possible, so repression must be the system that's in place.
Plans made to conduct campaign of genocide after Mandela's death.
While former South African President Nelson Mandela, 85, scoffs at rumors of his ill health, plans are being made by the nation's Communist Party to slaughter all whites in the country upon his death.
You may or may not be surprised to hear this, but the only place I could find a link to this article that Alex is reporting on was on Stormfront, the neo-Nazi white supremacist message board.
It's originally from WorldNetDaily, but they don't have it up anymore because it's intensely stupid shit.
As the story goes, a ton of very not made up anonymous sources told WorldNetDaily that there was a plan for a kill off of all the white people in South Africa after Mandela died.
It seems that Mandela being alive was the only thing that was keeping everything together, Ah, that dumb peacenik.
Incidentally, Mandela didn't die until 2013, and guess what?
When he was in the hospital nearing the end of his life, this exact storyline started flying around online again.
That black South Africans were going to kill all the white people after Mandela died.
Weirdly, or not weirdly at all, the comments on Stormfront about this clearly made-up article meant to inflame racists have a lot of thematic parallels to Alex's rhetoric.
A lot of talk about how the media would cover up the slaughter because it was against white people.
Kind of makes you think how close Alex and Stormfront really are.
He's got that weird border vigilante who's coming on, and Paul Joseph Watson's gonna show up, but, I mean, who cares about Paul?
But he takes some calls, and this caller has an interesting question, especially considering, on a recent 2004 episode, we heard a caller ask Alex what the military-industrial complex was, and he whiffed the question.
I was going to ask you if you could encapsulate and explain the military-industrial complex and how it would relate to the banksters and these creeps that are targeting the white man.
You know, how it ties in and just what the grand scheme of things is.
They'd have a Jewish quarter, and they would foster the groups hating each other and fighting with each other.
The globalists will play off Catholic against Protestant, Protestant against Catholic in Northern Ireland, and they will carry out terror on both sides.
They've been caught doing it.
So then the British can come in and militarize and take control.
In Africa, the UN will play one black tribe off against another.
Or more ideally...
They will play blacks off against whites, whites off against blacks.
I suspect even Alex gets that, hence the dancing around the different topic.
To the other issues, those examples he's listing aren't cases of globalists playing one side off against the other.
They're cases where there were real atrocities carried out by two groups of people who had deep disagreements with each other, and they're cases where many people in the rest of the world looked on and failed to act in a way that would have helped avoid the severest outcomes.
problems.
unidentified
Alex doesn't care about the idea of globalists playing groups off against each other.
So a caller calls in and asks about how there have been gold price-fixing schemes in the past.
And here's Alex's answer to that.
unidentified
They were talking about gold and stuff.
However, I'm starting to do research on it, and even that's not exactly safe because it's like there was a report about there was a gold price fixing scheme by the J.P. Morgan Group, and so it's like even gold's not safe anymore, which is kind of scary.
Well, Washington State is at the forefront of eugenics.
And over 400-plus thousand women, it's between 400,000 and 500,000, no one's sure, were sterilized from the 1930s up until 1985.
And we've had some of these women on.
It's been in the news.
Normally, if you were a single parent mother, black, white, it didn't matter, and your child made under a B +, they would send CPS to your house, they would grab you, they would kidnap your daughter, and they would take her and have medical students cut her uterus out.
Now, folks, if you don't believe me, you just have been hiding under a rock.
Just to let you know, it took forever to track down this article because much like a ton of the stupid shit that they've published over the years, the article about this two-child limit, it's not on WorldNetDaily anymore.
So I found someone reposting the text of this article on a Catholic message board, but mysteriously it doesn't really exist anywhere else.
There's no bill number listed in the article, and the person they said sponsored it, Marilyn Chase, doesn't have a bill that necessarily fits that description in her resume.
In the 2003-2004 Washington House session, she sponsored 428 bills and I looked through all of them.
And what do you know?
That's not there.
And it would be kind of hilarious if it were.
She's out here pushing bills about endorsing Dungeness crab fishing and some real Washington Yeah!
It's weird.
Anyway, after way too long of looking through bills about other things like fairy worker collective bargaining rights, I found the bill that they're talking about.
It's titled, quote, Promoting Population Sustainability, and it's HB 3111 from the 2003-2004 legislative session.
It was introduced on January 28th and was dead on arrival, ending up stalled permanently in the healthcare subcommittee.
This was a proposed amendment to RCW 43.70.130, which is a section of the Washington Legal Code that lays out the responsibilities of the Secretary of Health.
This bill would have added a 12th item to the list that was, quote, develop and distribute a pamphlet or other educational material that emphasizes the benefits and importance of couples limiting themselves to two or fewer children to promote population sustainability.
Alex is doing a hell of a job sensationalizing this proposed initiative that would have no enforcement mechanism at all and was dead in committee by the time he's on air.
I mean, you know, there's a part of me that says, that's stupid.
And then there's a part of me that says, what we should do, what we should have done so long ago, is overreact insanely to even the slightest bit of thing.
You know, because if you hear Alex Jones do this just on the, like, maybe give a pamphlet to somebody, what next step are you ever going to take?
Now, in this specific case, though, I kind of do think that this proposed amendment was stupid.
But the only reason I think it's stupid is because if you look at the other 11 items on the Secretary of Health's responsibilities that exist in the Washington legal code, they're pretty broad things.
This is way too specific to be something that's in there.
It doesn't fit with the...
I don't think it's necessarily a horrible thing to Have as, like, an idea, like, hey, you know, maybe, maybe, I don't actually know, maybe it's not, I don't know.
Also, it's important to note how Alex is talking about these things like sterilization and eugenics that did go on in America, but he's talking about them in a cartoonish way.
There were horrible things that were done to people, but saying that if you got under a B +, that CPS would show up and steal your uterus is just stupid.
And what you're doing there is you're giving the audience a diet of false information about real things that disenable them.
You can't deal with reality on its own terms.
You'll never be able to see the trends that did exist within the eugenics that went on.
in America that did have racial components to it, that did have class components to it, that will not be available to you to analyze, to understand, to put into your...
View of how the world exists.
Because you're just going to be like, oh, they got under a B +, the globus took the uterus.
Exaggerating and transposing the reality of what the victims endured in giving it to white people for no reason other than so they don't have to deal with what the government's forebears did to all of these people and then paralyze them to keep them from feeling like they need to do anything at all.
There's no need to rectify these horrible crimes.
If they're still going on and now they're only happening to you.
And so when the body created an autoimmune response to the tetanus, it would also create an autoimmune response to that hormone that was released during pregnancy, and it would attack the different glands in the female reproductive system and would develop polyps, generally benign but in some cases malignant, on the ovaries and uterus and cause other problems.
So, yes.
Yes.
Yes.
I don't know if that's the case with you, but a lot of these autoimmune diseases they found with the troops, and in other cases, they're putting very high-tech bioweapons that implant cancer, DNA, and other things into the population.
So what kind of a message are you supposed to get if you're that caller when Alex says, yes, yes, yes?
I don't know if this case is with you.
I mean, obviously you're supposed to come away with the yes, is the answer.
Yes, the globalists did this.
That's fucking horrible, what he's doing to her.
He's essentially recontextualizing her life for her and backing up this bullshit with supposed authority and a wealth of knowledge that doesn't exist.
If she believes him, her life and all her difficulties, they weren't just things that happened.
These things like being born into a dysfunctional family or getting cancer.
They weren't just random, they were attacks that were carried out by the globalists.
Instead of celebrating how resilient she must be to have gone through all that she has or empathizing with her, Alex is making her a victim of his imaginary enemies.
And he won't think about her again for a single second.
But she's still alive when that phone call ends, and she trusts Alex enough to call in and ask a question like this, so it seems like she might trust him enough to take this answer seriously.
That is him telling her because clearly her concern, her storyline that she is afraid of is that she was given cancer as a child because she came from a broken home.
The tetanus vaccine is largely given to pregnant people in the developing world because they're the ones who are most at risk and the immunity is passed on to the child.
Neonatal tetanus was a very serious risk factor in infant death, so it's why historically it's given to women or pregnant people.
It doesn't have this expensive hormone that causes miscarriages in it.
That was a claim that was made by anti-vax folks about the tetanus vaccine, but it's nonsense.
They claim that the tetanus vaccine has HCG in it and that it was given to pregnant people so that their bodies would learn to attack the HCG, which is a hormone related to pregnancy, thereby making them unable to have children.
In reality, what they're doing is lying about a different birth control vaccine that was tested but never released where tetanus was used as a carrier for HCG.
It's the reverse of this.
They're conflating that stuff altogether.
I'm pretty sure we've talked about this in the past, so I'm not going to dive too deeply into it again, but Alex is essentially pretending to care about people in the developing world by yelling about these imaginary vaccine concerns when in reality all he's doing is putting more people at risk.
So many kids die from neonatal tetanus, and it's entirely avoidable if people just take the vaccine, which is what Alex wants them not to do.
In 2000, approximately 170,000 children died of neonatal tetanus, compared to just over 14,000 in 2019.
Drifts a little too closely to some of the ideas that Alex would obviously have, which is that, oh, the Mexican government disappeared him because he was trying to stop their immigration flow or whatever.
That would be the conspiracy angle that someone like Alex would take on his disappearance.
Whereas, you know, the same thing kind of exists to feel like, yeah, you're out there, you know...
So Morris Dees and the SPLC gave legal help to the Salvadorians.
That's what's going on here.
So this is not how things went.
No.
unidentified
According to the court case, which Casey lost, the two Salvadorans were walking across a property on foot, at which point one of the members of the vigilante posse started chasing them, firing numerous gunshots and threatening to kill them.
The vigilantes held them at gunpoint, making them kneel on the ground and subjecting them to a lengthy interrogation.
They were held for approximately 90 minutes before they let them go, but not before threatening to kill them again.
Given the fact that this was a matter that appeared before the court, I'm going to take this account.
a little more seriously than this self-serving bullshit this guy who previously illegally detained high schoolers is telling Alex and not proving any of it.
Yeah.
unidentified
Because you'd really think that if a video of the entire thing was that he wouldn't have lost his goddamn ranch.
You know, I've always been of the opinion that if you are, say, a person who has a space that regularly experiences things that nobody else experiences, Chances are you're not telling the truth.
Challenger to Putin for Russian presidency is missing.
One of Vladimir Putin's challengers in next month's presidential election is missing, and the police and security services announced today that they have begun to search for him.
Every time there's an election in Russia, by the way, there's a bunch of bombings.
And then Putin gets to say, give me your liberty for security.
I've got to secretly arrest my competition, take over the media.
And Putin's been caught publicly blowing stuff up.
But I think when you're the head of the KGB who rises to power by doing false flag bombings and imprisoning your political enemies and you're still in power 20-something years later, I think that maybe you haven't had a change of heart.
I mean, if we were to redesign a slightly better society, I do think that responsibility should be much higher for people who accept positions of leadership.
So, we'll be back on Wednesday, maybe with a Modern Day episode, or maybe, I was just looking at Twitter while I was playing that last clip, and as we're recording, it was just announced that Tucker Carlson has left Fox.