Today, Dan and Jordan continue their path to the Dean Scream, and in the process get to know two dangerous border vigilantes, discuss the University of Texas's cannon-based celebration history, and learn that Alex doesn't know about Stone Cold Steve Austin. Citations Click here to support the Dreamy Creamy Fundraiser (if it's back online yet)
But I think that there's meat on bones in the past.
I think there's a couple of things that we get to talk about in this episode that are so far afield from anything that comes up in the present-day stuff that it's the difference between a good and a bad improv suggestion.
Every episode we do, we're trying to bring you the best episode possible, and I'll tell you what, you may want, you may think you want a present-day Alex episode, but then if you get it, you might find, I wish we had gone into the past.
It feels right that he's not meddling around and talking about the dynamics of the Democratic primary or Hillary's gonna run or whatever the fuck he would be doing at this point.
That tells me that this is like an automatic thing that Alex has set up where if he goes offline that track kicks in because he has a feed that goes to Genesis Communications.
I would have brought this up the last time that it happened because it's so jarring, but it was in that no man's land of boring episodes, and his response actually was pretty chill.
He laughed it off and said that that happens sometimes and made it clear that people shouldn't think it was any kind of an attempt to take him off air.
Like, nowadays, any tech problems, that's a globalist attack.
They were here in Austin, and there were people that, quote, didn't work for the phone company, continually in the big box down the road, every day when I went on the air.
So, one day I just started running a song when I went on air, drove down and caught the guy in there.
Another time I had somebody walk up the side of the studio, and there was just a cut wire out there.
And this was announced on some of the Asian television channels in Taiwan and other areas.
And we did find a news article out of the Sophie Morning News.
Reports Saddam Hussein has cancer.
The Assad Iraqi dictator, who is currently under custody with the coalition forces, suffers from cancer of lymph glands.
Oh, of course it's super fast and terminal.
Kuwaiti Al-Naab daily reads, citing an Iraq official, according to the daily, the disease is in an advanced stage, so doctors predict the former dictator would probably live a couple of years more.
Doctors came out with the fatal diagnosis while making thorough medical checks of Saddam Hussein that is captured near the hometown of Tikrit in December 2003.
Allegations of Saddam Hussein's illness appeared during the military campaign in Iraq last year when one of his private doctors residing in Syria claimed that the former dictator suffered from cancer.
Oh, how convenient.
Just like in about a week and a half after the announcement Jack Ruby dropped dead from super fast cancer.
Kind of like the Shaw was fine and got flown into England and died real quick of that fast cancer, but I'm sure he really does have it.
So the obvious implication here is that the globalists gave these people fast-acting cancers to kill them as a way of covering up how they were the ones pulling the strings behind people like the Shah and Jack Ruby.
Jack Ruby stood trial, and then three years later he was diagnosed with lung cancer.
It's not clear if he had cancer, and he refused to have a biopsy after he was captured, but it is possible that he did have cancer, because there's definitely a family history.
Also, I just love Alex being smug and talking this shit, while in reality he doesn't seem to know that these reports of Saddam having cancer, it's not...
Nothing really new.
It's, you know, seven years history of these reports coming out.
If he's going to cover this story, you'd think you would have an awareness that this isn't news, but he's acting like it's coming out of nowhere to conveniently get Saddam out of the way quick.
So this is a story that Alex is reading from Rents.com, which is a website run by nutball conspiracy theorist Jeff Rents, who happens to hate Alex and the feeling is mutual.
So you wouldn't expect him to resist covering this story on that count, but he loves to pretend that his gut instincts are so precise and always accurate, so you would think he would have picked up a cent on this.
Maybe there's nothing to fact check, but his gut, which is 99% accurate.
I only know that song because the movie rant came out when I worked at a movie theater, and I had to clean during the credits, and that song played every time.
It's not a country, a sovereign entity, unless it has borders.
I have lived my entire life in Texas.
My ancestors fought and died and are on the memorial fighting the Mexican dictator Santa Ana.
And when you go to Mexico, if you look like you have money, In some of the tourist areas, they leave you alone down south on the coast, but if you go down south over the Texas border, you'll be treated with hatred, you'll be called names by the police, they will rape your wife right in front of you, beat you up, they will take you to the jail, they will extort hundreds of thousands of dollars out of you.
This is what they do.
In fact, almost everyone I know has been rousted, has been harried, has been fed on.
If you try to...
Come to their country illegal.
You're lucky if they don't kick your guts out.
But that's okay.
That's loving and good.
You're not going to find the ACLU or the Southern Poverty Law Center going after the corrupt officials over there.
Also, it's absolutely not the place of the ACLU or SPLC to step in with cases where an American citizen is detained in a foreign country.
You don't have the same legal protections in other countries that you may have here and your citizenship is not a shield that you can use to avoid other countries' laws.
In a situation when a U.S. citizen is arrested in another country, they should contact the consulate or the U.S. embassy who will be able to help them in some general way.
You know, we've been desensitized to this over the years, knowing that they were planning to...
This isn't like the amnesty of the past, where they just give amnesty to those that are here.
This is everybody in perpetuity, but...
This is finally getting the dumbbells to wake up, but now the neocons, some of them, are trying to pacify them.
Give us the picture of what's going on.
unidentified
Well, I think we saw it coming.
We saw the trial balloons drifting through the clouds when Secretary of Homeland Security, Ridge, a few weeks ago said that these people should be legalized.
We knew it was coming.
Actually, I knew it.
Right after George Bush was elected, when he said, we have to make, and this was in the newspapers three years ago this month, he said, we have to make migration safe and orderly.
When I read that, I knew we were all in trouble.
Since illegal immigration is already safe and orderly, at the time he only could be talking about illegal immigration.
And that at the time.
Three years ago, told me that George Bush was an open borders globalist, ready to sacrifice the country on the altar of globalism.
So Glenn Spencer is an old-time xenophobic bigot, and his pretend concerns about immigration are not things I take particularly seriously.
George W. Bush's presidency was a time of steeply decreased numbers of naturalizations of immigrants, and there was no massive amnesty offered to undocumented immigrants within the country like was done in 1986.
Until his fairly recent death, Spencer used drones and other tech to stock and vigilante patrol areas around the border.
He was a pile of shit.
I've probably brought this up before, but just in case I haven't, I wanted to talk about a 2008 column he wrote for American Patrol.
It's titled, quote, Speaking the Unspeakable.
Is Jew-controlled Hollywood brainwashing Americans?
After I had posted, quote, That Jews do in fact control Hollywood sure the op-ed he's talking about is a satirical op-ed written by noted humorous Joel Stein The article launches off from an ADL poll that found out That only 22% of Americans thought Jews controlled Hollywood right and Joel thought that number was way too low Yeah, one of the tip-offs
That maybe this isn't an article you should be taking as a sincere source about anything is the clear humor-based tone, like in this part.
Quote, I've taken it upon myself to reconvince America that Jews run Hollywood by launching a public relations campaign because that's what we do best.
I'm weighing several slogans, including Hollywood, more Jewish than ever.
Hollywood, from the people who brought you the Bible.
And Hollywood, if you enjoy TV and movies, then you probably like Jews after all.
He's clear.
Clearly, and just look at the body of Joel Stein's work.
Also, it's worth noting that at the bottom of Spencer's article, he links to an article called, quote, Understanding Jewish Influence by a guy named Kevin MacDonald, who's a real anti-Semitic piece of shit.
McDonald once wrote, quote, Christianity was an uncontested part of public culture until large-scale Jewish immigration in the early 20th century.
The immigration laws were biased in favor of Europeans until 1915.
1965 when the long Jewish campaign to change them finally succeeded.
The reference to 1965 is about the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, which many call the Heart Seller Act.
This Immigration Reform Act got rid of the national origins based quota that was in place previously.
Much of the ideology for the quota system was based on the then popular ideology of eugenics and was meant to ensure an overwhelming white majority in the US population.
majority in the U.S. In fact, there were attempts to place stipulations in the bill that they thought would limit the ability of the bill to increase non-white immigration.
There were various little things that were slipped in.
But in the end, it turned out there were a lot of people from the Eastern Hemisphere that were wanting to come here and were being barred from doing so based on blood quotas.
And now that these blood quotas were gone, they were trying to come in to the land of opportunity.
Anyway, the reason I bring this up is that it's a really big conspiracy in white nationalist and neo-Nazi circles that the Jews plan to use the Hartzeller Act to bring in masses of non-white people to the United States and as an attack on the white population.
It's a piece that's behind the great replacement type ideas.
Anyway, this is clearly McDonald's point, and this implicates Glenn Spencer fairly heavily because his primary issue is harassing immigrants at the border.
He has no relevance to any public conversation except in terms of immigration issues, so to see his article using Kevin McDonald as a source on how to understand Jewish influence, it's hard to believe that he doesn't also subscribe to some of McDonald's ideas about the Jewish influence on immigration law.
Yeah.
unidentified
My point is that Glenn Spencer is at best aware Yeah.
So I'm trying to say something positive about Glenn Spencer, and that is he is one of the only guests that I've ever seen show up on Infowars with clips ready.
I proudly affirm that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders, and that Mexican migrants are an important, a very important nation.
That was then President Ernesto Zedillo of Mexico, 1997, speaking in Chicago.
So I went and I watched this whole speech, and the part that Glenn is using here is wildly out of context.
He was talking about how the Mexican government has a duty to help protect the rights of immigrants to the United States from Mexico, and how he had just championed legislation to allow immigrants from Mexico to retain their Mexican citizenship, even if they pursue American citizenship.
Glenn's interpretation of this as an admission that the former Mexican president wanted to use immigrants to recolonize the Southwest is way off base, and it's less informed by Yeah, you can't really re-colonize something that you didn't colonize.
It's worth noting that Glenn is not talking about the Mexican government here.
He's talking about the population only having war with the United States as their shared history to take on as an identity.
This is obvious nonsense, but it's also worth pointing out that it's a tactic that Glenn is using to justify his racism as some kind of a defensive mechanism.
Also, it's just an unsolvable riddle why a colonized people in a former colonizing country would feel differently about their connection to a particular place.
It's a real mystery why France wouldn't still be claiming that Mexico is a part of France, but people from Mexico might still have some feelings of ownership over Texas that was formerly Where they were.
It's so fun for Alex to just make shit up to pander to his audience that's desperately addicted to feeling like they are victims because they're white.
The aggrievement is just spectacular and so powerful.
For what it's worth, the tower on campus at UT Austin, the big, huge tower, it's lit with special lights and a giant Texas flag flies on the pavilion for Texas Independence Day.
And they've celebrated that holiday for a long fucking time.
The next year, they tried to get the school to officially recognize the holiday and let them out of class, but the then president of the university was from North Carolina and didn't understand the dynamics.
Quote, Just before sunrise on March 2nd, the students arrived for their celebration, only to find a large nail had been driven into the ignition hole of the cannon.
It took some time and the employment of several pocket knives to remove the item.
By then, Winston, who's the then president of the school, had arrived and was rather unhappily resigned to the fact that the students were going to celebrate.
Hoping to minimize the damage to the class day, Winston asked the Laws, the law school students, to move the Cannon away from the main building down the hill to the university's athletic field, or they could wait until afternoon to have their fun.
The entire law department attended, including Bats and Professor John Towns, and following the cannon fire, each person gave a short but sincere patriotic speech.
Of course.
Sure.
Yep.
Yep.
the acadams vacated their classrooms and joined the laws outside.
And the scene of the morning was repeated with more speeches from students and professors.
His opening line from that speech that he was forced to give outside his house by these students who had stolen a cannon and brought it to campus for Texas Independence Day begins as this.
Quote, I was born in the land of liberty, rocked in the cradle of liberty, nursed on the bottle of liberty, and I've had liberty preach to me all my life.
But Texas University students take more liberty than anyone I've come in contact with.
What a fucking awesome story.
It's a shame that Alex can't enjoy that without admitting that he's a lying pile of shit who just makes things up to inflame anti-immigrant sentiment in his audience.
It's so great.
Such a cool story.
Alex didn't say that UT doesn't allow people to celebrate Texas Independence Day because he knew that as a fact or he even had any solid backing to make the claim.
He said it because it feels right to him that the students wouldn't be allowed to do that at school.
So, Glenn Spencer, we bid adieu to him, or goodbye, because he only likes English.
But we get another guest, and that's Joel Skousen, who's obviously, we know, royalty of the anti-communists by virtue of him being the nephew of W. Cleon Skousen.
Yep.
And a long time, even fairly to the present day, although not maybe as regularly now as he has been in the past, but a guest who goes through all of Alex's career.
There's several hundred PNAC reports, and I've probably read or scanned through about 60 or 70 of them.
I've spent many hours reading PNAC documents.
Every time I find some new indescribable horror, we'll post a link to the PNAC document from PNAC's own website, Project for New American Century, and then we'll watch it in the next few days and weeks develop into major news stories.
Because the mainstream media, the Associated Press, Reuters, Gannett News Service, Knight Ritter, are so lazy, I have to go out and write an analysis of Patriot Act.
I have to go out.
And find subsections of bills.
You as listeners do that.
Time and time again you'll see it on the so-called alternative media six months, two years, five years before you see it in the mainstream news.
So what is PNAC?
It was Bush's kind of exploratory presidential committee that was formed in 1997 that wrote some of its most chilling Forecast and wishes and plans in 2000.
And in Rebuilding America's Defenses, written by Cheney and Rumsfeld, different documents on the PNAC website are collaborative efforts by different members of this administration and surrounding think tanks, phony neocon think tanks.
And they say, word for word, Saddam is not a threat, but he is a convenient pretext to get the oil and to use Iraq as a new military base of operations to go into Syria and Iraq.
I guess it's probably true that the Project for the New American Century probably did put out dozens, if not hundreds, of papers in their time, but...
There's zero chance that Alex has read more than one of them, and even that is suspect.
The only thing he knows about is the only specific that he ever brings up, which is that Rebuilding America's Defenses paper.
Yeah.
unidentified
If Alex had any actual interest in that document, He would know that at the end of the paper, there's a list of all of the participants in the project meetings that led to the discussions that were then synthesized into this report.
They must be involved in everything that the group puts out.
The document does not say that Saddam doesn't pose a threat and he's just a useful excuse to go in and get the oil and establish bases to go into Syria and Iran.
Alex claims that they say that word for word, which isn't even figuratively true.
I think what Alex is misrepresenting is this passage from the document.
Indeed, the United States has for decades sought to play a more prominent role in Gulf regional security.
While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides an immediate justification, the need for a substantial American presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.
If you take that sentence in isolation, you may come away with the idea that Saddam is a piece of a larger puzzle, and that's pretty fair to the larger context of the paper.
Thinking that what the authors are saying is that Saddam isn't a threat and is just a boogeyman used to justify invasion and plunder requires a reader to bring that preconception to the text itself.
It's a practice of eisegesis as opposed to exegesis where you take the things that are in the text and pull them out.
He's engaging in eisegesis where you have your own ideas and you bring them to the text and experience.
It's something that I've been stressing a bit lately because I think it's important.
You can make a valid and compelling argument against the worldview and ideas that are expressed in Rebuilding America's Defenses, that document, without lying about it.
But to do that, you need to do some work.
You have to read the document, you have to consider the arguments, and formulate responses designed to show that the document itself is shit.
That isn't super hard, but it's also not easy.
Like, it's not something that you can just make up on the fly, Boring for an audience that likes excitement.
Instead of doing any of that stuff, Alex takes shortcuts.
He makes up more exciting storylines about the document, like that it's a confession that Saddam wasn't a threat and it was just about oil.
He attaches popular, exciting names to the document who have no direct connection to it, like Rumsfeld and Chaney.
He establishes the document inside of some giant body of supposed knowledge he has, where he claims he's read a ton of PNAC documents and they're all full of horrors, yet mysteriously He's only ever brought up this one.
Yeah.
Alex takes these shortcuts because he's not interested in the principle of opposing what's in that document.
It's about the aesthetics of being against it and about using the document to prop up the larger conspiracy worldview that he profits off of.
It's important to understand this about his use of primary sources because, again...
Even if you rightly agree with him that PNAC sucks, you can't trust him to provide any real useful information to help you understand that subject.
Imagine yourself in a conversation with someone who disagrees with you about this PNAC document.
If they know what they're talking about and you repeat some of these claims that Alex has made about the paper, you've lost the debate immediately.
You've been equipped with useless and false claims that make it more difficult for you to effectively push back against the agenda that's...
Embodied by the Project for a New American Century, which is a real shame, because Alex pretends he's doing the opposite of that.
It honestly reminds me, what he does reminds me so much of my joke writing process where I would have the premise and then I would have a punchline that I thought was good enough to work on, right?
And then I would go up and I would riff out the middle bit.
There have been a couple of times where there's this feeling that comes back very viscerally of being on stage and you have this punchline that you think is going to crush and then you say it and there's no response and you realize that you missed a part of the setup.
unidentified
Oh, that's the worst.
You guys would have got it if I had given you that piece of information.
Dick Cheney talks about maybe we need to legitimize the use.
He doesn't say maybe.
He says we need to legitimize the use of race-specific bioweapons and legitimize their use in the media.
Race-specific bioweapons.
I mean, what a little jewel that is.
Can you imagine if you or I got on the radio or wrote a news article about how maybe we should develop race-specific bioweapons and legitimize their use?
I would expect I'd have the FBI Mr. Jones, get out here.
We've got questions for you.
Get out here and we're knocking down the door.
See, we had a real FBI.
That's who they'd be after.
But no, we're not saying that.
We're not writing that.
We're not doing that.
We're fighting against that.
But the Vice President says we need to legitimize the use of race-specific bioweapons with the public.
Do you know what a race-specific bioweapon is?
I know most of you do.
It's a bio-weapon that kills certain races of people.
And so then you would be left in a situation where you'd have to become defensive and insist that it does exist, and in order to do that, you have to completely misrepresent passages of the text, or you have to wrestle with it, which is a little bit more difficult, and then you realize Alex is full of shit, and you can't listen to him, and you can't rely on him to give you any accurate information.
Yeah, I mean, I feel like the easiest thing in the world is also one that is very, very difficult, which is if somebody comes to you with something that is structured like this, if I did this, I would be arrested instantly, and he gets away with it?
There's a good chance that they didn't do it because they wouldn't get away with it.
Yeah, a lot of the time that is, especially when you're talking about advocating for race-specific bioweapons, when you're in that kind of a territory, generally.
The great classic excuse that this guy whose entire life is based on being a violent vigilante against immigrants on the southern border had no idea who the National Alliance was.
I'm gonna just guess that this is the same excuse Alex is gonna have for why this dude went on shows of noted bigots and anti-Semites like Clay Douglas and Hal Turner as well.
Jack Foote is going to be Alex's guest on this episode, and he's a real piece of shit.
Just like Glenn Spencer, who Alex had on the previous day's show, Foote has decided to be a vigilante and take policing immigration into his own hands.
He was the head of a group called Ranch Rescue, which is not at all like Bar Rescue.
Instead of yelling at failing bar owners, what Foote would do is create militarized compounds on people's ranches and wait for immigrants to cross through the property, at which point they were apprehended, or kidnapped, depending on your perspective, terrorized, Cool!
group would like the story to be, since there's no real way to tell if they didn't follow through on some of those death threats.
Yeah!
unidentified
There are plenty of unsolved murders of border crossers, and as the ADL has reported, in many cases, when these immigrants have been found murdered, they are bound, as if they have been apprehended prior to being killed.
Anyway, Foot may or may not be a murderer, but his group is absolutely in the business of terrorizing immigrants.
As luck would have it, Ranch Rescue terrorized the wrong people in March 2003 when they did their usual routine with a group of four Mexican immigrants on March 7. and then with two Salvadorans on March 18th.
These immigrants went on to sue, and a judge ruled in their favor, ordering Foote to pay $500,000 and turning over possession of the 70-acre ranch they were operating out of over to the Salvadoran victims.
They took ownership of that ranch and had said that they were going to sell it and give the proceeds to immigrants.
And Alex is making a real pattern of platforming, elevating, and promoting people who are actively terrorizing people at the border.
He is desperate, too, to whitewash their associations with legit Nazis, like he does here, making up that Foot must not have known who the National Alliance was.
Get the fuck out of here with that shit.
Alex knows damn well that this dude knowingly went on that Nazi show.
It's just not good for his brand to know that.
So he lies to the audience to get them to accept this bigot on false pretenses.
We were just talking to Dan in Illinois, and we'll go to these other calls.
Dan in Illinois was saying, well, hey, these corporations are so corrupt, using the government to control us, we've got to pass regulations to control them.
But understand the fallacy of that.
You don't have the lobbyists.
You don't have the payoff money.
You don't have your people controlling the government, staffing the government.
So if you try to get the government to pass regulations, they'll go, okay, and they'll pass more regulations for you.
The only way to stop...
These big corrupt corporations that are organized crime syndicates, not free market, is to restrict the size of state, local, federal, international government because those are the mechanisms of control.
This should make perfect sense, but I was explaining that to Dan and he still, I don't think, completely got it.
So what you'd want to do in order to reel in these corporations is decrease the power and ability of the government to reel in these corporations.
Because as soon as those corporations are free and unfettered from these regulations and the binds that the government can put on them, they'll start doing the right thing.
Briefly, Ranch Rescue is a property rights advocate, and everything we're going to talk about today is available to your listeners on our website at www.ranchrescue.com.
We are conducting Phase 2 of Operation Thunderbird here on Private Ranch in Cochise County, Arizona.
Your listeners may recall, Cochise County, Arizona is the number one illegal border crossing point into the United States and has been for the past five years.
On December 20th, our volunteers were conducting a reconnaissance patrol in the southern part of our host's land, which is right up next to the border road.
Mexican troops...
Armed and in uniforms, OD Green uniforms and OD Green Kevlar helmets, crossed onto our host's property and were challenged verbally by our reconnaissance team.
The Mexican troops, there was about ten of them, we estimate.
We know for certain there were two in the lead with AK-47 and RPK machine guns.
The rest of them retreated back into the wood line, and after they got themselves into a concealed position, they fired on our volunteers.
That's all cute and all, but there's a big difference between being on a Nazi show and being on CNN.
If you're being interviewed on CNN, odds are that it's at best a neutral interview and at worst, if you're Jack Foote, it's an adversarial interview that makes you out to be a crazy racist vigilante.
Your presence on the network isn't going to be used to grow or help CNN.
Conversely, if you go on the National Alliance radio show, you're going to be used to perpetuate Nazi shit.
Your entire worldview is about how immigrants are an invasion coming into the country to attack the existing white population, and this conversation will be right at home in white supremacist and Nazi circles.
You're not going to get a neutral interview there.
In fact, you're going to be treated as a hero, standing up for the white race.
And it should come as no surprise that that's exactly how the National Alliance interview went.
He was interviewed by National Alliance founder and Holocaust denier Kevin Alfred Strom, who was good friends with John Birch Society founding member Ravilo P. Oliver.
Also, Strom went to jail after pleading guilty to possession of child exploitation material in 2008, so cool.
The interview is downright fawning, and it ends with Strom saying this.
Quote, it's the mission of the National Alliance to make the facts of this invasion and the racial and cultural change it represents known to white Americans and to translate that knowledge into political and social change.
Enforcing the law is not enough, though we must demand that it be enforced.
And I wish that Ranch Rescue was 10,000 times larger than it is now or that Mr. Foote ran the Border Patrol so it was done properly.
The only solution that will work is white living space.
Until we have our white living space, I'm glad we...
We have men like Jack Foote who are working within the system, though that system fights them at every turn to stop these criminals.
You can just give me a break with this going on CNN is the same as being celebrated by Nazis bullshit.
The only thing that Foote said in that last clip that matters at all is when he said he was aware of the National Alliance and what they believed when he agreed to be on that show.
At that point, he was consciously using his vigilantism and almost certainly fake heroic stories about border confrontations to appeal to the white supremacy of their audience.
It's weird how he spoke a little differently to the Nazis.
From that other interview, when he was asked how they deal with Mexican troops, he said, quote, We fire them up.
No warning, no requests.
If they're armed and in uniform and obviously a foreign military unit, then we open fire.
So strange, almost like he knows how to tailor a different message to different audiences.
Also, it's weird how this whole interview with Alex is about protecting America from illegal immigration at the border, but it doesn't come up how Ranch Rescue has one chapter outside the United States.
You better believe that comes up when Foote is talking with the Nazis, though.
quote, we are facing eventually the same sort of crime wave that was happening in Rhodesia in the 1970s.
Seems like maybe, just maybe, these folks are primarily racist vigilantes who like to make their actions seem less despicable by pretending they're fighting a defensive battle against the Mexican military, when in reality, most of what they're doing is terrorizing and abusing scared, vulnerable immigrants.
So one thing that might be able to convince me that this confrontation with the Mexican military happened is if there was a police report that backed it up, some kind of official documentation.
Even if they hit one of us, if they commit a murder inside the United States, they can run back into Mexico, and Mexico will never extradite them to face either the life or the death penalty.
And look, I think that there is a possibility that if somebody who was just a civilian person unrelated to the Mexican government came across the border and shot someone and then disappeared back into Mexico.
Right.
That would be difficult.
First of all, figuring out who they are would be difficult.
Second of all, extradition might be complicated, even if they did figure out who they were.
Right.
unidentified
If it was a member of the Mexican military in fatigues, in formation with other military members, it would be a gigantic deal.
You would not just be able to dip across the border unless there was an active military attack being carried out by Mexico, which the United States would then...
It wouldn't be war, but there would have to be all the posturing, there would have to be all the bullshit to make them not look weak or whatever the fuck dumb shit they do.
I mean, it's so funny how much I remember from this time period, like the bloodthirstiness with which everyone was treating quote-unquote terrorists, and everybody's like, well, you can't be mean to these.
Why would we be unhappy with terrorists who live inside our borders and terrorize people that we don't like?
He's right in Alex's wheelhouse and he should have been furious that his whole catchphrase and all the shirts that everyone wore said Austin 316 on it.
Look, just because Alex is a phony sort of representative of a group doesn't mean that all people who are members of that group deserve the derision that you should direct at Alex.
I think even more interestingly, though, is this clearly there's a season going on or a little bit of an arc of just a lot of agitation against immigrants.
And it's pretty gross.
You can see very clearly these people that he has on who are people who are on the ground terrorizing immigrants.
Yep.
They are people who have very direct associations with Nazis.