Today, Dan and Jordan check in on Alex's podcast (which is completely not connected to Free Speech Systems). In this installment, Alex may get a friend in legal trouble, and fights through laryngitis in order to interview a dreadlocked idiot.
It's just open world enough, and at the same time, it's kind of bizarre to, like, you know, if you play Legend of Zelda Breath of the Wild, you know, you play that, and it's like Hyrule.
The check, it's a nightmare when you're headlining, but at least you have like 30 minutes in advance of the check so you can be charming and people will be like doing the check and paying attention to you.
If you come on during the check, you might as well be done.
And should have reached out to Tucker Carlson, should have talked about it on air, but I was waiting to get more info.
And then earlier this week and tonight, in fact, one reason I aired a few promos and got on about 20 minutes after the show started was because I was on with sources in D.C. that are describing, expert sources, what the judge was doing when the media and the jury were kicked out.
I do think that this is something that raises some concerns because the people who are situated in a position to give Alex inside information about this trial Well, R, Biggs, and Norm.
We know about Ray Apps and the other feds that were there calling for attacking the Capitol.
But now, amongst a bunch of information that's about to come out with documents, and I'm not going to get the specifics because I don't want to mess up the defense of the Proud Boys, but the feds screwed up mightily.
And they used evidence that they'd planted, just like with the Governor Whitmer kidnapping.
With a former high-level CIA operative and a female individual, not saying she's a sex operative or a swallow, as they call them, to give a war game to the Proud Boys that they never acted on of taking over D.C. And it's actually a CIA war game.
And all the conversations that they had amongst themselves, not CIA agents or honeypot operatives, about how they wanted to do this and how they were excited to, and Joe Biggs live-streaming himself talking about how we're taking over the Capitol.
I mean, I struggle with him bringing up a specific example of the CIA doing this before, specifically the Whitmer case, because they were also convicted.
A lot of times, but nine times out of ten, I'm right.
One smart thing Donald Trump said was the deepest thing he ever learned was to be shallow.
It's like a woman's intuition.
You study, you have knowledge, you're always researching all the pieces, and then your first approximation is usually dead on right.
The best shots I've ever made with a gun is when I don't try, and I can shoot here at 800, 1,000 yards.
I just relax, pull back.
This is an analogy.
I'm not saying I'm shooting anybody.
And squeeze the trigger, and the deer goes rolling head over heels or the wild hog or whatever it is.
In fact, when I had time to go, you know, hunting.
And it's the same thing.
I don't just go off half-cocked.
I don't just go off with no info.
I do all this deep research, immerse myself constantly.
And then nine times out of ten, when I just shoot from the hip with what I originally think it is, the first approximation is usually right.
And they want us to cut off our instincts, cut off our common sense.
That we know is there.
Another analogy is, if you've ever had somebody physically attack you, if you think about what you're doing or you try to over-become technical, that's when you get your ass technical.
You decide to get somebody off of you and just, I'm going to stop this person.
It just happens right away because you turn loose your instincts.
But you've got to have the baseline of research and info for your synapses to access to make its decision.
If you don't have the big baseline, the foundation of research, info, history, I'm using fighting as an analogy.
It's a primitive version of that.
That you really can't be able to have that instinct and that instant analysis.
But I also do a lot of deep thinking and a lot of research and a lot of weighing of things politically, culturally.
But I had this instinct that like, I think that a lot of the criticisms that people make of him, like he's a racist, he's an asshole, I think a lot of that stuff is true.
But I didn't have the research background behind it.
But then I went through all that process, and it turns out I could have just listened to my instinct because they were correct.
So yeah, I mean, I think if you're somebody whose bread and butter is talking and you have to constantly be fighting not to cough, maybe you do take the day off from this extraneous show that you don't need to do.
I swear, every time he gets me on, he has me like, you're going to do this, right?
And I'm like, yes, sir, I'll do whatever you say.
And on Wednesday, middle Super Bowl, that's fine.
I ended up talking with some local people that I do some protests with back in the day during the lockdowns, and they're continuing to do a lot of protests with the Drag Queen Storytimes and some other things.
There's about three different factions that I'm working with.
Talk to them about when the best time that they wanted to do it was.
And it's a little bit out, but it's good because we're going to have time to get it together.
So the new date, and we're sticking to this, you know, you put me on the spot there, is Wednesday 22nd, okay?
And it's between 11 and 2 o 'clock, all right?
And Audra Morgan is the one that's helping put that together.
So he's the white dude with dreadlocks who went viral a year or so ago for yelling about COVID policies at a board of supervisors meeting in San Diego.
I want you to have a taste of this fella.
So I'm going to play that speech that he gave in full.
That's the wind blowing through your ancestors' bones begging you to do the right thing.
That is the wind that Matt Baker is calling upon.
Sir, please state your name.
Through the black people, through the white people, through the Chinese people, through the Mexican Americans, through the people that built this building with their bare hands to raise up this nation, they are begging you and they are blowing through your veins.
Yes you, Dr. Wilton You are in violation Of the Nuremberg Code This is anti-annual law I'm going to take To talk about this Wait, do you care about that?
All of this is coercion.
The vaccine passport is coercion.
And the penalty for violating the Nuremberg Code is...
You can easily see the Alex Jones impression that Matt's doing.
There are phrases that he's just lifting whole cloth, and the entire thing is really just an exercise in performative passion, something that Alex's brand is reliant on.
If you watch Matt, you can see the gears turning and the switch being flipped on.
Maybe it's something that's just been built up in me from watching thousands of open mic sets in my life, but the performance aspects of this are painfully transparent to me.
At the beginning, when he's being all dramatic and then the board asks him to identify himself, he works his name into the dramatic shit about the wind because the guy...
I'm sure he's actually upset about COVID stuff, but I think this is pretty obvious that this guy's trying to build a brand here.
And that suspicion would end up being confirmed, if you had it at the time, when a little bit after this, Matt popped back up at another local board meeting, this time in Maricopa County.
Matt Baker was one of the most prominent faces from the rash of people yelling at council meetings that went viral for a bit.
And if you paid close attention, you might notice that whenever you saw Matt, he was always wearing the same shirt, which is also the shirt that he's wearing on his Infowars appearance.
It's a shirt with the Statue of Liberty wearing a mask that says Slave on it.
It should come as no surprise that he runs a shirt business called Slave to Liberty, selling these shirts among other weird conspiracy-focused designs.
I'm sure that Matt is mad about some of this stuff, and maybe he does believe that shit he's saying, but he has also very clearly identified a shortcut to finding a place in the market.
No one can stop you from speaking at these local meetings, and if you tape yourself doing some ridiculous Alex Jones impression rant, you stand a good chance of being shared widely within the far-right media.
If you suspiciously are wearing the same clothing item, which you sell during each of these performances, you'll probably move a large number of them and get a pretty sweet payday for essentially doing nothing.
From there, the next logical step is to transition into chasing whatever cause is popular among the shitheads who loved your act, thus complaining about drag queen story time and popping up in Maricopa County to yell about the midterms.
Anyway, the other day he went to shoot a video at the Pfizer building in San Diego, so he's hot again.
He and his other extreme right-wing activists in San Diego are planning a larger-scale protest at that Pfizer building, and Alex suggested that Matt do it on Sunday, but Matt realized that was the Super Bowl, and he couldn't get a crowd that day, so I guess he's going to go on the 22nd.
Also, I'm not going to play this for you, because it would be cruel, but Matt also did a parody of Ground Control to Major Tom.
See if you can guess what the name of it is.
In a million years, you'll never guess this.
Ground control to Major Tom.
I will say two words.
I'll give you...
Two is still in there, but two other words are the same.
Matt has some Patriot friends, and maybe they've been more successful than him in some ways, and now they won't let him yell about Pfizer on their shows.
He's a smart little guy, and he makes some good points.
But I never trusted that guy.
Never.
I always knew Alex Jones was legit.
And I'm going to tell you this is a fact.
I'm not making this up, and I'm not going to say any names.
One of my good, good friends interviewed Alex Jones, and the network...
Wouldn't let the interview go on air, even though Alex had bigged up these people and helped them promote their shows and took the time out of his life to do it, right in the middle of him being basically the hottest thing on planet Earth.
And one of the channels that you tune into and you think is helping you is going to save America, threw Alex under the bus and will throw James O 'Keefe under the bus, and you can't save Pfizer!
So with all due respect, which is none, I have to say that Matt and Ben Shapiro are in completely different worlds of media.
Sure, a lot of right-wing media loved the image of Matt's video yelling at the local board meeting because they knew they could use it to inspire other people to sabotage local politics and intimidate folks.
It was incredibly politically useful for them, but Matt himself isn't.
No one in the actual media would see anything worthwhile in him.
He's doing an Alex Jones impression, rattling off deep-end conspiracy bullshit.
He looks like the dirtiest form of hippie you can amend, Alex, on the other hand, just wants attention.
And if that comes with the...
Side product of elevating and being associated with a dude like this, so be it.
Yeah, he talks about, like, at one point, I didn't cut a clip of this, but he talks about, like, all my life I've known I was a bit smarter than everybody else.
Also, totally understandable that someone would refuse to air an interview with Alex.
Most interviews with Alex should have been thrown in the can.
Like, maybe you feel like you could have a good interview with him, and then you show up, and he refuses to engage with any questions or topics, constantly screams plugs for his own website, and says horrible, hateful shit.
At that point, it's a responsible choice not to air it.
I do wonder who Matt's talking about.
Like, who's his good friend who interviewed him?
Off the top of my head, the only real interview I can think of that Alex did that didn't come out was with Mike Tyson.
And my sense is that wasn't because it was politically explosive as much as it was probably really embarrassing since they were both on shrooms.
This honestly should be an entry point for him to realize how much of his belief system is based on whims and the messaging that he gets from outlets like Infowars and Tucker, but it won't be.
This'll just be a little blip and essentially an isn't-it-weird kind of moment.
This is a great illustration of the self-defeating nature of the modern far-right conspiracy paradigm.
In about 30 seconds, Matt lays out two really central pillars of far-right thought and hits a brick wall where each reveal themselves to be self-contradictory.
The first is the idea that the globalists can essentially control all elections, and all elections are stolen to serve the whims of the power elite.
This was a central pillar of the InfoWars conspiracy space for years and years, where Bush and Clinton were just puppets on New World Order strings.
Yep, that narrative had to change a bit when Trump won because according to the storyline, he was the anti-NWO guy who was fighting the globalists, so there wasn't really a way to make this make sense if the globalists stole the election in his favor.
Thus, the transition to a talking point where the globalists tried to steal the election, but Trump was just too popular, so he overcame the theft.
I'll be the first to admit that that's a pretty good save, but it's also a one-time solution.
If that truly is the case, then the globalists aren't going to let that happen again because they learn from their mistakes.
They're a scientific technocracy, for fuck's sake.
This presents a pretty large problem for 2024, but I think the audience is so uncritical that these thought leaders can easily just flash up a fake graph and say, amazingly, it was just such a huge landslide that the steel didn't work again.
So Matt's also wrestling with a second narrative dead end, which is that any politician is super easy to criticize based on their donors, and you can really assassinate anyone's character based on that if you want to.
He wants to back DeSantis, and does, but there's the question of his backers.
This is a great example of selectively creating a problem.
That expectation is that these candidates should be held responsible for who backs them, but they really want to support DeSantis and his backers are bad.
Instead of sticking to the imaginary principle of judging a candidate by their backers, Matt is able to rationalize that you can call anyone bad by pointing to the bad people who financially Right.
Further, it would be great if he could just think a little bit further down the line about the stolen elections and realize that this isn't a real thing either, and just exist as a narrative crutch to rationalize why supposedly super popular candidates end up losing, and to delegitimize the electoral wins of candidates that extreme right-wing folks don't want to accept actually are popular.
He's not going to do any of these things, though, because quieting that voice that could recognize that all this is bullshit is the surest path to not selling any more shirts.
I noticed about six months ago over the vaccines, so-called vaccines, I finally got pissed.
And said, I'm not going to support Trump if he doesn't come out against these shots.
And man, it was like a switch, revenue-wise.
Even though our revenue is supposedly for people buying products at InfoWareStore.com, it went down like 40% overnight.
And I guess that's just programmed people that hear me pissed at Trump.
I still like a lot of what he did.
I still think he was better than Obama or Mitt Romney or whatever.
But I mean, it's like, wow, there is definitely...
So I think a lot of that is just situational.
I think a lot of these networks like Newsmax or OAN or others mean well, but they see, oh, it's okay to care about Democrats, but when you say, hey, Republicans do a better job here, oh, no, don't do that, because people see that as infighting.
It's narrative-based content, and if the narrative that's being relayed is out of sync with what the audience wants to accept as reality, They'll find someone else who will give them that narrative and that magic.
I don't trust the numbers that he's citing at all, but I bet his revenue did drop some at that point that he's describing, which is why he never followed through with his plan to burn Trump.
When Alex made his ultimatum that Trump had to come out against the vaccines or else Alex was going to destroy him, nothing happened.
Trump probably didn't even hear about that ultimatum, and nothing happened.
Alex pretended that it didn't happen at all, and then he went back to saying, I'm mad at Trump about the vaccines, but golly, isn't he so good in other ways?
That was the middle ground of appeasing the pro-Trump elements of the audience, and making sure that they didn't abandon ship, while giving the anti-Trump contingent the appearance of providing some pushback, and like, hey look, I call his like I see him, you know, he's bad on this.
That's just another one of those things that you can't think too much more about because if you're like, listen, if we go off message for even a second, people hate us.
So, do you think maybe, maybe you're not fostering a good environment for disagreement and growth?
I mean, isn't an oppressive society that is intolerant entirely of people who the power structure deems to be outside the norm, isn't that preferable to...
Like, weird lighting and costumes at a Super Bowl halftime show?
Yeah, well, that's what the devil does is he always does some horrible, provocative thing just to get your attention because he's circling the intergalactic toilet bowl.
That is very close to penetrating the shell of the conspiracy bullshit.
And then here, he's very close to understanding, oh, all this stuff we're outraged about is really only just driving traffic for the people we're pretending to hate all the time.
And so there is this futility of almost getting it.
At that point, when you realize that the game is rigged, and that we, the people, all of the people in the cheap seats are on the one side, and only the five people in the skybox are on the other side, you say, this game's rigged, we're on the field, there's five, seven billion of us, and we're going to take this entire stadium over!
unidentified
Send out their little minions, and they send them to the floor.
Yeah, this is a dumb analogy, because the way he's telling it, no one wins the game.
There is no game.
It's supposed to be a football game where humanity, if they win, then the globalists are imprisoned, and if the globalists win, humanity is enslaved.
That's a fine setup, but then it goes off the rails when he seems to think that the victory condition for a football game is one team's fans take over the stadium.
Within the rules of football, it's hard to make this work because the audience doesn't get to play in the game.
I think the best you could do is say that humanity has a deep bench.
And even though the globalists are cheating and stabbing people, apparently, every time they take out one of our players, another monster of liberty gets off the bench and into the game, and you need to prepare yourself to possibly be on that bench.
I will say, I have noticed recently, back in the day, there was a lot of Alex Jones memes and video clips going around, and then there was a long period of time where that was very low on the totem pole and not a big thing.
I surf Instagram and all these things.
Do you mean when he was de-platform?
It's sad, actually.
I wish this battle...
That's the one thing I don't like about the battle, is to be informed, you kind of have to become an addict of, like...
Yeah, it's almost weird that this seems to coincide with someone recently taking over a platform that had kicked a lot of far-right figures off of it and then suddenly allowed them back on.
It's obviously not true, but I think what's really being communicated here is that social media is where all these people get their spin and narratives from.
Some of it is from shows like Alex or Tucker, but more often than not, those shows are just covering bullshit that someone else posted on social media the day before.
What Matt is saying is that to stay up to date on what's popular in the fringe right-wing media, It's really important to obsessively monitor social media so you can see the trends and how various conspiracies are performing.
That way you can pick which ones are the best for you to adopt and champion and which don't really get people excited.
He believes that negative consequences are an indication of virtue.
And the way that he always talks about it is that...
Back in the day, the fighter pilots would go wherever the flack is.
That's where you go.
You didn't have radar.
You'd fly over the flack, and that's where you drop your bombs.
Alex has talked about this a million times, to the point where, as he was starting to get into the...
He starts telling a story about his grandfather being a pilot, and I was like, this is gonna end up with him talking about you go over the flack to drop your bombs.
It's just, you can hear it coming a mile away.
So Alex gets down this path, and then he starts...
One flew fighter planes, only did a few missions, crash landed, coming back into England, almost died, flipped the plane, you know, wasn't like some super ace or anything, but my dad's dad volunteered for more missions.
It was Catch-22, you did 22, North Africa into Italy.
Whole nine yards.
The Germans attacked their base in North Africa.
We didn't know this until he died.
We had all the letters and commendations and medals.
And he died like 52 of cancer.
My dad's dad, Jerry Jones, not the Dallas Cowboys owner, but the point was they strapped their base, shot him up, blew him up.
He had concussions.
The next day their plane flies out.
He's not the captain anymore.
It blows up over Italy.
And he had guilt until the day he died.
So he had like 18 missions in, he re-ups for a whole other 22 missions, and then re-ups for a whole, and they finally pulled him and said, no, we're going to make you a manager once he invaded Italy to run like the feeding the troops thing as an officer.
But the point was, is that researching what those B-17 pilots, he flew a Liberator at first, and the B-17 was, you went, they didn't have radar back then.
It had just been developed, it wasn't in Europe.
You went to where the flak was.
You went to where the attack was.
So they would see all these cannons exploding and all the shrapnel, and they would steer into those hundreds of planes, into the shrapnel, into the attack, to then drop their bombs.
And so the U.S. troops could take out the tank fields and take out the factories and everything.
And the Russians didn't have that, so they lost 20 million troops.
The U.S. lost less than a million because they sent the Army Air Corps in.
But the reason I tell that story is...
That's what we're doing.
We're going in, over the flack, into the attack, and that's what we're doing, and that's why I love the attack.
I love it.
I'm ready to go to prison.
I'm ready to die because this commitment against these people and all these unborn children and all the little kids they're trying to give the shots to and all the evil they're doing, if we can stand up for them and be men right now, we're going to save a lot of lives.
When you have a son and he's acting a little fruity, they're like, oh, this guy, maybe we should give him some more estrogen.
Has it ever crossed anyone's mind that maybe there should be an actual hormone therapy because of all of the endocrine disruptors that are destroying the...
Gonads of the male to say, if you have a fruity son, maybe he does need hormone therapy.
Maybe give him just a little taste of testosterone and see how he feels when he looks at a woman.
So, leaving aside how stupid and offensive that is, it should be pointed out that these people like Alex and Matt clearly don't have an actual problem with hormone therapy.
Their only actual complaint is that they want to restrict its use so it holds up their narrow and bigoted worldviews.
If taken at face value, Matt isn't just talking about trans people here.
He's also suggesting that if a parent suspects their son is gay, they should give him testosterone to make him like women.
This even goes past a lot of the Infowars-style talking points where it's fair game to delegitimize trans existence.
This is bordering on suggesting that being gay isn't even a real thing, it's just that gay men don't have enough testosterone.
I guess lesbians don't have enough estrogen or something, I'm not entirely sure.
Matt doesn't elaborate on this point.
Also, most hormone therapy is used to treat side effects of things like menopause and often is a part of cancer treatments.
I wonder if Matt's worried about how one possible approach that you can take for prostate cancer is using CYP17 inhibitors, which decrease your levels of androgen.
You know you might want to treat the cancer, but what if it makes you fruity in the process?
These are not serious people, and their ideas don't deserve to be taken seriously.
The only thing that's even real here is the damage that their political movement can do to members of the LGBTQ community, and how that needs to be pushed back against aggressively.
But in terms of what he's saying, this means nothing.
He's saying that if there is blood pressure or whatever, there's a thing.
And he accepts that a doctor will prescribe that thing for its use correctly.
He just blanket accepts that.
Then there's another thing.
Diabetes, insulin.
He blanket accepts that insulin does the thing that it is supposed to do.
Now, he asks the question, why...
Do we not do something similar in this situation?
There is an answer to that question.
There is.
There is an answer that you could go find.
You could go find the answer about fucking insulin, too.
But you just accept that the answer to insulin is true because that's what you've been raised to believe is true, despite the fact that you're a fucking moron!
If your son is, I don't know if the testosterone boost works, and I'm not a doctor, I'm just saying, what if, let's say, you know, you had a son who was acting a little fruity, and maybe you just accidentally put some, you know, testosterone boost in his fruity pebbles or something.
unidentified
Like, you're really going to let your kid become a little wimp?
Yeah, if you're a parent and you arbitrarily decide that your kid, your son, isn't masculine enough, maybe, because you have decided that you think he's gay or something like that, then yeah, put hormones in his food in order to make him into what you want him to be.
For somebody who is screaming at the San Diego board about the Nuremberg Codes and the ideas of informed consent, I do think that maybe drugging your child in their food maybe runs counter to that a little bit.
So anyway, we have one last clip here, and like I said, I think Matt wore out his welcome a little bit, in terms of just being, not like he pissed off Alex, but just like, Alex seems to disengage a bit, and I don't think Alex liked this that much.
I mean, I just grew these massive hair, because before, I couldn't even really join the movement, because everyone was just telling me I was Bill Hicks.
If you're not a new podcast, if you've already got connections, and you're starting a new show, you come out strong.
Get people's attention, get some subscribers, then you gotta keep them going for a good five or six episodes before you have maybe a Matt Baker on to suck your show to garbage town.
Well, I think what makes it pathetic, certainly, or at least amplifies it, is that delusion that he's something more than a guy who had a viral video and now has been on a couple of super low-hanging fruit shows.
I think that kind of, like, I'm somebody, you know, is a little bit of a bummer.