Today, Dan and Jordan dip back to the past to see how Alex deals with the lead-up to Saddam Hussein being found. In this installment, Alex bores everyone and interviews a severely antisemitic 9/11 conspiracy theorist/techno musician. Citations
And I wanted to loop back and touch back on that here a little bit before we launch into 2003.
I don't believe that we said anything that I disagree with necessarily in hindsight, but I did get some messages from listeners that have been really helpful in terms of illustrating ways that we could have discussed that issue better and from a broader perspective.
And this is a very severe issue when it comes to the point where poverty ends up being a contributing factor towards someone wanting to pursue MAID.
The case of Amir Farsud, who we discussed on the last episode, involved that dynamic where his disability payments weren't enough to keep him out of poverty and weren't enough to allow him to find a place to live, which would leave him living with severe pain unhoused.
We did talk about how his case illustrates the need for greater social welfare, but I wasn't really aware of the endemic problem that advocates around disability-related issues have been raising around the intersection of poverty and disability and how this makes the expansion of MAID to include people whose deaths aren't reasonable.
This is really important stuff, and I'd like to learn more about it and possibly talk to someone who knows more in the future.
My coverage of Alex's content on the subject has a tendency to sometimes not see all of the broader context and implications of a story, because I'm looking at what he's saying and then evaluating that.
So my apologies for not stressing some of the more important aspects of what rational people's complaints about MAID actually are.
There's a real critique and an Alex critique, and I'm focusing on the Alex critique, and sometimes that means I don't...
And some of that's the challenge, and some of that is just, you know, you miss some things sometimes.
That being said, I do think that some of our conversation was surrounding the question of how...
Social safety and welfare programs would be a solution to some of the confounding factors that were being discussed in these cases, though I think we could have done a better job of highlighting and focusing in on what some of those problems were.
Now, the second problem, which I actually think is a bit bigger, is that there have been some reported cases of people with disabilities being offered MAID, as opposed to them pursuing it.
Further, Canadian laws have not built in oversight and regulations that many feel would be needed to make sure that that kind of care is being applied responsibly, and that's a really big concern.
I do think that advocates and human rights experts have a valid point when they say that this legislation does have the potential to have a dehumanizing effect on people with disabilities and, in essence, create a perception, whether in the mind of the public or in the medical profession, that their lives are somehow less worth living, and that is definitely unacceptable.
I'm not sure what the answer is, but I'm going to read more up on this and try to listen to folks with better perspectives, but I am confident in my opposition to Alex's coverage of the story.
The takeaway that I have is that there are more reasons to take this seriously and that Alex's coverage paints a cartoonish version of the problem and exists in direct opposition to the most logical elementary solution to helping some parts of this, which is a greater social investment in lifting people out of poverty.
And so for anybody who took issue with some of our commentary, I apologize that there was a slice of this and a section of it that was missing.
Fair.
And I hope we do a better job of being mindful of a lot of that stuff in future instances.
Well, I moved in a new parish, but the last parish I was in, I got the whole police department to change their attitude toward things and be a little bit more lenient and talk to me about it instead of condemning me.
I made friends with a whole police force.
I can go into the police building, and everybody shakes my hand, and they agree with the tapes.
So I suspect that cops are more affected by Alex's earlier documentaries because those films are kind of veiled threats against the police.
They're essentially arguing that the police are the strong arm of the globalists and will be used to enslave the population and thus will be the Patriot's enemy.
Unless they're explicitly on the side of the Patriots.
The message is essentially, when things go bad, we will kill you, unless you're on our side.
It's the same messaging in a ton of militia materials.
For instance, the book Unintended Consequences involves a plot to assassinate law enforcement carried out by Patriots who've had enough of gun grabbing.
This isn't necessarily what you'd call a direct threat, but it also definitely has an undertone in these materials that...
It might seem to help explain why they resonate so strongly with people in law enforcement.
They're more or less telling any viewer in law enforcement that there's a war coming, that the patriots will win, and they need to decide if they want to be one of the good guys or if they want to die as a villain.
And, you know, it's a very emotional appeal that's made in those documentaries, too.
And you could see if you're a cop, you might identify with the people being labeled a villain and be like, I don't want to be a villain.
All right, folks, it's Tuesday, the 2nd of December 2003.
I'm Alex Jones, your host.
We have a special guest for you in the second hour, documentary filmmaker and author Eric Huffschmidt, who has done just an unbelievable job exposing the mathematical impossibilities, the frauds surrounding September 11th.
So, Eric Huffschmidt wrote a book titled Painful Questions, an analysis of the September 11th attack, which hasn't held up well as time has gone on, as is a theme with 9-11 conspiracy stuff, particularly from this early stage.
However, this is not what I find interesting or troubling about Eric Huffschmidt.
I find his aggressive anti-Semitism far more important.
Huff Schmidt has a YouTube channel where he's posted some clips of his public access TV interviews and also a clip from the movie A Bug's Life, which he claims is allegorical.
Sure.
description of the video reads, quote, "...from the movie A Bug's Life, the leader of the grasshoppers," parentheses, Zionists, "...explained what would happen if the stupid ants," parentheses, Goyim, "...were to realize that they don't have to be under the control of the grasshoppers." For some reason, around 2009, his channel shifted over to some recipes and cooking content, and then to videos of bugs.
I was sort of curious about this, but it seems like it's not a mystery worth solving, so I left it alone.
He's a big-time Zionist-occupied government type of conspiracist, and that's his underlying theory about 9-11.
However, I was able to satisfy my own doubts by doing a little bit of cross-referencing.
For instance, two of the audio clips he's posted on that page are about Carly Franz, a woman who has made allegations about being ritualistically abused by the Masons.
Incidentally, on his own website, hugequestions.com, Eric routinely talks about Franz and her allegations.
Because I was able to find overlaps like this, I'm pretty confident that this is his This audio page, actually, I know for sure it is.
So that means I'm going to play this anti-Semitic trash for you.
So here we have a suggestion that Jewish people aren't human.
That's not good, but Jordan, it gets worse.
unidentified
Is that every society treated Jews with decency and respect, but after a while that society got tired of the abuse, lies, crime, murders, and other horrible behavior of Jews.
Then that society threw them out, and the society that accepted them treated them with decency.
And after a while they also got tired of the abuse.
And look at the behavior of Jews during the 20th century.
It's the same pattern.
For example, the Germans treated the Jews with decency and respect, but the Jews decided to abuse the Germans.
So Hofschmidt is actually suggesting that a world without Jews would be a better world, and essentially he's making an argument in favor of extermination.
This is one of the most blunt pieces of content I've seen one of Alex's guests produce, and the fact that it's delivered with a shitty techno song just makes things a little bit less...
You may have noticed that the line, 9-11's just the start, is in that really anti-Semitic song, so this seems like a really bad booking on Alex's part, unless he's trying to do a Nazi show.
Also, this episode is in December 2003, and by as early as 2007, Huffschmidt had turned on Alex and decided that he was working for the Jewish cabal.
So, in addition to being an offensive and meritless guest, this is also something Alex should look back on with personal embarrassment.
Here he is, elevating the...
of a lunatic bigot who by his own devices probably tops out at about being interviewed on public access and then he's giving him some credibility that he will just be attacked with later when Eric Huff Schmidt finds out that Alex's wife is Jewish.
So, you know, I think that there's a lot of people who are under the notion that Alex's show in the past used to not be as extreme as it was, as it may be now, or something.
Because there's a story that's written about Alex's past.
And it's a story that the only people generally who have any awareness of what a show is like are people who love Alex and aren't going to necessarily put...
And also, because...
I don't know, maybe Eric Huffschmidt knows what he's doing.
But in reality, if you explore Eric Huffschmidt and you go to his website and you take in his material, your perspective is going to be attempted to be shifted to blaming Jews for everything.
Yeah, and I think it's something that's so easily exploitable by folks like Alex and folks in this world because, you know, the tendency to believe in conspiracy theories, it really does build upon itself.
He's written a book on 9-11 and the cover up there, and made one of the best films out there on the subject that's unlocking a lot of minds.
And there's been a lot of new developments, and we wanted to have him.
I've only had him on the show once before.
That was about a year ago.
We've got Eric now back up with us.
Eric Huffschmidt, for those that just joined us or never heard you before, tell folks how you got involved in this and who you are, what you do, and what you put together.
unidentified
Thank you.
Actually, I got into it in a roundabout kind of way because I just developed software for a living, and after the towers went down, I was...
You know, noticing on the internet, there's a lot of people that were called conspiracy nuts, talking about how, oh, we shouldn't trust this government of ours.
Something's funny about this attack.
And, you know, I was like most people.
I wasn't paying that much attention.
I was dismissing them as nuts.
But eventually they got through to me, you know, the constant complaining.
And I look on, so I started looking closely at what happened on that event.
And that's when it occurred to me that those towers looked like they were blown up.
Building 7 looks like it had explosives in it also.
And I was thinking, so my first reaction was to tell people about it.
You know, I put some documents on the internet saying it looks like these towers were blown up.
So let's just say I'm an average guy on the street.
You've got the film.
You've got the book.
You're going to try to explain this to me.
What happened?
Tell me.
unidentified
Well, what it looks like, when you look at how these towers, first of all, when the planes hit the towers, you cannot even see in the video that the, I mean, there was news cameras all around it, and those towers didn't hardly move.
They swallowed those planes up as if they were nothing, like a bee had run into them, which shows how strong those towers were to swallow a plane up at that highest speed without really shaking or wobbling or cracking.
So the plane itself did not damage the building all that much.
The planes hit, the towers shook a little bit.
You heard the people inside saying they felt the towers sway, but it was like a strong winter storm.
And then the tower stood back up again and then settled down and then stood there, perfectly motionless.
Yeah, the gulf between what seems like it could be and should be true and what is is so large that there's so many places where it's like, you can't understand how everything works.
He and Alex just have an interview that dances around the general most common talking points around 9-11 conspiracy theories and it...
Sucks.
Naturally, they don't get into any of Eric's almost comical hatred of Jewish people because Alex isn't trying to give the audience an accurate picture of the people he's presenting as experts that they should support.
That would make it too clear to them what they're involved in.
Eric Huffschmidt sucks, and I've gone through a lot of his website to get a better sense of what he's all about.
Everything is about the Jews.
There's a lot of Holocaust denial in the mix, too.
There's one article that I thought might be interesting as a break from the rampant anti-Semitism, because it was an interpretation.
So apparently this is a description of an orgy, according to Eric, which is, that's a snooze.
Who cares?
Yeah.
unidentified
There's an entire saga about this woman who apparently has been emailing Eric and wanting to marry him, but he breaks off contact with her out of fear that she might be a secret Jewish...
He suspects and speculates about how this could be a setup.
Quote, one of the thoughts that passed through my mind is that Peggy could be used in a manner similar to Mark Chapman.
Specifically, the Jews may be pushing for her to meet with me, and then the Jews would be able to kill both of us and make it appear as a murder and suicide by a mentally ill woman.
So this is, he's lonely, like I said.
He tries to reassure himself, but he just can't quite get there.
But I recently tried some underwear that is so much more comfortable than everything I've had in my life that I thought I would mention it in case some of you have been irritated by your underwear also.
This underwear is extremely comfortable for standing, sitting, or walking.
But if you have to do a lot of movements of your pelvic area, such as crawling around an attic, or fixing plumbing problems, or doing exercise, the extreme movements can cause your penis to be pulled out of the pouch.
But it remains comfortable even when that happens.
Quote, unfortunately, modern societies have such a problem with sex crimes and sexual inhibition that the descriptions of the underwear avoid words such as testicles and penis and instead use words like the boys and junk.
Quote, Since this document is probably going to be considered obscene by some people, I may as well mention another issue that adults ought to be discussing without hysteria.
Some men believe that having a large floppy penis makes them better than the men who have smaller penises or who have, quote, accordion-type penis that compresses to a smaller size.
Some people have been so convinced of this that they're stretching their penis to make it bigger, such as Roberto Cabrera and businesses are offering products for penis stretching.
And one of the questions on the Amazon site that sells the David Archie underwear is from a man who's hoping that the underwear will make his penis look larger.
The children who grow up in the USA could pick up the attitude that men should have giant penises and that women should have giant breasts or how many people actually...
My opinion is that giant floppy penises are an annoyance.
My penis will compress like an accordion when it's cold, and I think that it is much more comfortable compared to when it is warm and flopping around, although this David Archie underwear is making that flopping problem disappear.
So, I mean, there's a surreality to this that I feel like sometimes I want to be able to allow people who are listening to our show to get a glimpse of.
That you're listening to Alex's show, he introduces a guest, you look into them a little bit, you find this horrific, bordering on exterminationism type approach towards Jewish people.
Then you poke around a little bit more in the site and you find this ridiculous shit like the Katy Perry video review being contextualized as Jewish people having pop star sex slaves, whatever.
Then you go a little bit further and you find this nonsense.
Well, I think that the way you can kind of make a little bit of sense of it is that so many historical conspiracy theories have led downhill towards anti-Semitism.
And so if you are getting into a hateful conspiratorial mind view and you start exploring a ton of things, odds are you will encounter material that takes you down that road.
But I think that also this big floppy penis underwear review, it highlights another thing that I think is crucial that you start to see.
And that is like with Alex.
He's a fucking monster who puts out hateful, bigoted material.
Oftentimes...
Crypto in nature, sometimes hiding behind other rationales for things, but he also sings along with the highwaymen, and he also talks over you belong to the city, and he also likes sci-fi to an unhealthy extent.
Like, there's other facets of his personality.
Michael Savage came up earlier, and I used to listen to a ton of Michael Savage's show, and he is a horrific bigot as well, but...
Sometimes he tells a story, and he can weave an amazing yarn about old-time San Francisco eateries.
I think it's like with this particular situation, there are lanes of bigotry that you can kind of push people down or classify people under.
You know, you have people like Tucker, who is a virulent bigot, who is smart enough to hide just enough of it to pass.
who is using it for evil by vetting his guests or editing his guests and he's doing all of this in service of money and power and all of this shit and this guy is not that you know He's a bigot.
It's so important that you get this $22 two-hour video.
Also, the $22 book full of, I don't know, over 100.
color pictures and diagrams this is a lot of research incredible work went into this you need to have the book and the video infowars.com or prisonplanet.com you support eric's work you support my work at the same time you get a powerful tool to wake your friends and family up alex is taking his access to his audience and using it to funnel monetary support to eric and simultaneously he's selling his material so alex is making money off
Now, when we talk about Sandy Hook stuff, one of the things that is really important to consider in terms of...
A lot of people like to say, oh, he was wrong about something, and then he apologized.
Why is it so bad?
But when you really look back at this period...
And you look at the way that Alex was funneling his audience to support Wolfgang Halbig and facilitate his ability to carry out the harassment, to fight the legal battles that he was in, the way Alex directed and advocated for his audience to give them money, and the way that Alex sold their stuff on his website.
That is a relevant piece of this.
Through the machine that Alex has built.
And the audience trust and access that he has, he has, like, given extreme people access to money that they would not have otherwise.
Wolfgang Halbig didn't have access to a giant platform before Alex allowed that.
Eric Huffschmidt was on public access interviews and shit.
And the way that it was spread then, when there weren't those million different outlets and million different internet spaces for it to grow, the way that Alex had built that, you can see all the guys that we still see around now.
If it weren't for the way that that was disseminated...
A lot of those guys wouldn't have quite the same power.