Today, Dan and Jordan take a look at an emergency episode Alex put out on Saturday. He had just fled from Connecticut, mid-trial, but what prompted that departure? In this installment, this is revealed, and Bobby Barnes shows up to try to be a real asshole.
So at the end of last week, Alex had a blow up in court.
And I did get a little bit of feedback that, on our last episode where we talked to Elizabeth Williamson, did not give a whole lot of context for what was going on in the courtroom when Alex was having his blow-up.
He was being questioned about his coverage of Robbie Parker, and Chris Meddy asked him questions along the lines of, you put a target on this guy's back, did you not?
And then Alex got really mad, started saying about how liberals wanted to kill people in Iraq.
It was like a TV show where somebody is pretending to be a lawyer and they just shout objection and the judge has to be like, you have to have a reason.
And Norm was like, I'm a real technical lawyer in the universe.
So, yeah, I mean, they had the jury leave the courtroom, and the judge was confused by the fact that Norm was objecting to things that Alex was saying.
Right.
unidentified
As opposed to things that the other counsel was saying.
It was like watching a T-ball game where the kid hit the T three straight times and they're like, well, technically that's a strikeout, but this is T-ball.
So I'm going to put it right back on that T one more time.
And then the other thing that was a constant source of tension and a problem was that Alex would be asked yes or no questions and then answer with what was starting to be a monologue.
Yeah, I believe if Mehdi doesn't call him, Mehdi reserved the right to call him again under subpoena because that's what you would have to do at this point.
But Norm has also said he's going to plan to call him to testify on his own behalf.
And the main reason so he can actually monologue and not have to answer yes or no questions, basically.
I just got back last night from Connecticut in the show trial.
And I've been following the news globally of war escalating to incredibly dangerous levels in Ukraine.
And I'm strongly considering not even going back to testify on my own behalf in our part of the trial, the show trial, because I'm that concerned I could get stuck there without my family with a nuclear war break.
So that's why I took my wife and my youngest daughter with me.
I feel like this is one of those math problems where you're like, okay, sure, you say a million a day, that's a problem, but it only takes like a week before it's 10 trillion people dead or whatever, you know what I'm saying?
Yeah, I think this is a little bit silly, but if you were to ask him about how he knows this, you'd say something about actuaries, and then we would move on.
And the way you trigger the public to peacefully protest and to flood the streets with candlelight vigils that transcend party is by taking this live show feed right now and sharing it on mainstream platforms like Twitter and Instagram and Facebook and on Getter and independent groups like Gab and everywhere else.
Because you are the info warriors and without you, ladies and gentlemen, we are not going to be able to stop this.
We have a good chance of stopping this, but even mainline analysts predict A 50% chance of a tactical nuclear war in the next few months in Europe.
That will cause a global depression, incredible problems.
It'll be a nightmare beyond imagination.
And mainline analysts, and I agree with them, give it about a 20% chance of a full-on nuclear war.
So I have a lot of trouble focusing on all the side issues.
Does he, and I'm going to throw this out, because I think, based on what he's telling me, because nuclear war is so imminent, and almost, frankly, unavoidable, I mean, it's a coin flip, whether or not we have a tactical nuclear war, which I would argue, if you start with a tactical one, you're going to get a full one pretty quick.
You know, like, if the court isn't important, if those tertiary things to nukes are not important, I feel like money is less important now than it's ever been.
People better take this more serious than anything they've ever taken in their lives.
It's that real.
You better kiss your children.
You better hug them.
You better hug your mom, your dad, your brother, your sister, your mom.
You better get right with God.
And I'm telling myself that when I point my finger at you, three more pointing back at me.
But we're coming under judgment, ladies and gentlemen.
Now, before I hit all the serious documented news, for a couple weeks, I've been sent countless texts and seen countless videos talking about the 24th of September, 2022.
And how all these historic things historically have happened on this date.
And how it ties into the Jewish calendar and mysticism and the rest of it.
It's so interesting when it's convenient for him to be into arcane, esoteric bullshit and when it's convenient for him to just sort of look down on it.
The judge, Judge Lopez, in the bankruptcy case, removed his lawyers and his reorganization officer because of conflicts of interest and a lack of transparency that was very clear on Alex's part, and excessive spending that was suspicious.
Sure!
You wouldn't expect somebody whose business was going in through a bankruptcy to spend $80,000 on security for a trip to Connecticut that you cut short because of nuclear war.
So I went into bankruptcy to prove in these courts I don't have all this extra money to go under that scrutiny.
And a lot of people see that and they go, oh, you're closing your doors.
No, Chapter 5 is emergency reorganization, where you show you're having trouble paying your bills, but then you go into reorganization where it sets the benchmark for how much money you actually have so we can stay on air, continue to operate, and also...
Show to the state courts and everybody else, when they claim I have $400 million, like they falsely did in the Texas show trial four weeks ago, we can show certified all the stuff that it's just a lie, and then that allows Infowars free speech systems to stay on air and continue to operate, because they have federal laws where you're not supposed to just be able to sue somebody and shut them down.
I looked at the big situation that was going on, the fact that we were on the verge of insolvency and all their lies, and I said, let's just put all the cards on the table and go into bankruptcy.
And then most lawyers don't want to work with us.
Most people don't want to work with us, but I got some good lawyers.
But then the way the courts work is you have other separate lawyers that don't work for you that handle the actual bankruptcy part.
And those lawyers, the judge ruled last week, Judge Lopez in Texas, had not been transparent about everything they'd done in the past.
Not bad things, but the fact that they'd publicly done our last bankruptcy, the Democrats kicked back.
So we got Infowars, the website back, and Infowars Health, that's a successful company, and some other things.
It was a very real bankruptcy that was tied to free speech systems to, like, quote, pay debtors.
But they kicked that back.
Because they wanted their show trials.
They didn't want that bankruptcy to hold up all these show trials.
And so the lawyers, not even the lawyers, the CRO that they appointed, did not disclose, even though it was public and all over the news, so why disclose that?
That they'd done the previous bankruptcy just months before.
Okay, so you're saying that if you hired a lawyer who is very interested in getting a job for you, right, and that lawyer did a good job, then that lawyer would get that job, right?
So maybe that lawyer would have an incentive to do a, quote, good job, as opposed to an accurate one.
You're going to run into brick walls that you didn't even know you needed to ask about, you know?
It's that kind of thing where even if you are doing a good job, Alex will say something, and if you believe any word he says, he's going to get away with one thing, you know?
Like, it doesn't matter if he gets away with all of it, but you just don't have the capacity to get every single thing unless you are completely, I suppose, opposed to his continued existence.
Some of these little excerpts that the crew put together.
One of them is where they attack me over cryptocurrency like I'm a criminal.
Show the crew, put a little promo together from that.
And then we're going to go ahead and air, before I left yesterday, Connecticut went to an apple orchard with my wife and daughter, my five-year-old, and that's AJ...
Are you telling me that he's going to play a clip of him in the courtroom, a compilation put together by his team, and he's also going to play a clip of him and his wife and his daughter walking through an orchard together?
So there's no problem with Alex's getting crypto or anything like that, and that wasn't the problem.
The issue that was trying to be elucidated by Chris Matty was the issue of, Alex, do people know that when they give you crypto, it goes to your personal account?
Right.
Because that could be seen as maybe deceptive.
Fund the Infowar, donate to this, and then it goes straight to his wallet.
And as he said in the trial, he said, well, and I understand what you're saying, but it all just goes through my personal account.
To the business.
Now, I would argue that perhaps for a good piece of evidence as to why maybe we should be suspicious about that, he said, I'm going to take $20,000 right now.
And the point of this whole trial is to present a trial where only one side is allowed to present their case.
And it's the part of the case that's not considered relevant for this stage of the trial.
And that's exactly what's taking place.
And fortunately, you were able to successfully resist their effort for you to play to their script, for you to stick to their tale, for you to play the villain in their role.
Boy, I don't think so.
Because the truth of the matter, it's why they could never afford a trial on the merit.
That's why they could never give you your day in court.
As we've seen presented, I mean, the lead witness was an FBI guy who knew nobody who died that day.
As if he wasn't somebody who responded to the school.
As if he wasn't somebody who was the subject of conspiracy theories surrounding people being actors that ended up conflating him with Mr. Wheeler, another grieving parent.
So, I mean, he's just pretending that the whole thing about Matt Mills, the guy who interrupted the Super Bowl press conference, didn't happen in the courtroom.
Yeah.
Because that would satisfy this curiosity that he has.
I can't get into attorney-client stuff, obviously, Robert.
But...
They were calling our lawyers back there yesterday morning.
They were in full panic.
They were on the ropes.
And they basically didn't even want me to testify yesterday and didn't know what to do.
And we said, yeah, we'll just come back and we're able to, quote, present our case, even though we're handcuffed and straightjacketed and restricted next week.
Why even have Norm do a cross-examination on the limited stuff Maddie said?
Because Maddie crapped the bed in Norm Pattinson's words.
But they were in complete panic.
Even the media agreed that it blew up in their face.
Well, I mean, I think their script is not going to plan because their script is false.
And that's their problem.
And so they're trying to die.
And because Norm Pattis has refused to go along with their effort to script this trial, and you refuse to go along with efforts to limit your ability to defend yourself adequately as you're constitutionally entitled to within the rules, they're not having success.
And you're seeing their emotional frustration be publicly expressed.
I mean, to be honest with you, from a pure legal perspective, lawyer perspective, this has been very incompetent representation.
I mean, these parents have had ineffective representation.
I understand that this is a very politically powerful, connected law firm in Connecticut.
But I've heard from many people who are on the plaintiff's side in this case who thought that the plaintiff's lawyer was terrible.
And it's because he's more politically motivated to prosecute this case, it appears to me, than he is actually getting to truth or justice because actual justice would rule against him and actual truth is in fact – against him and that's why he can't that's why he's stuck in this situation trying to do a soviet style stasi style cuban fidel castro style show trial but can't achieve it because the truth is still leaking out anyway chris maddy is bad counsel says King of bad counsel, Robert Barnes.
The question was, I mean, they can't even understand what the Reichstag fire is.
They can't even understand what a false flag is.
A false flag originated from pirates putting up a false flag to trick the boat they were about to hijack and loot.
That doesn't mean the looting didn't happen or the hijacking didn't happen.
A false flag is an event that did in fact happen, but the cause and the culprit are inaccurately identified.
And that is precisely what's been taking place.
And what were the issues concerning Sandy Hook?
Which is, it turns out, the politicians pocketed the money rather than put school safety first.
And if they had done so, if they'd done something as simple as allow teachers to lock the inside of the doors of the bathrooms inside their classrooms, be able to lock the inside of the doors into their classrooms, be able to have other means of self-defense available, such as trained people with guns, teachers and school safety personnel, then the reality is a lot of those kids are alive today.
But the politicians couldn't let that message get out.
And the reality is the Democratic Party, he didn't like the fact that you put up a poll at Infowars that asked what might be a future false flag.
But that's because what's the political reality right now?
The political reality right now is the more school shootings happen, the more plaintiff's lawyers like his firm profit.
The more school shootings happen, the more the Democratic Party, with their gun control agenda, profit.
They don't have an incentive to maximize school safety.
And that's why they covered up what happened at Sandy Hook and the school safety inadequacies that took place there.
And that Democratic politicians were embezzling and pocketing money that was meant for school safety, and that's why the shooting happened, and they're covering that up by sort of making an example of Alex or something.
Big Pharma has culpability here because the way in which young men are being medicated on some of these drugs is often backfiring and has side effects they often don't fully know about or meaningfully remediate.
They don't want to talk about inadequacies of school safety because that implicated the Democratic politicians and political class in Connecticut.
And they don't want to talk about culture that glamorizes violence because it's a culture they profit from.
And they don't want to talk about media glamorizing these individuals that commit these horrible crimes because big media profits a lot of the pockets of the cash the most from anybody.
And that's why they had to blame the gun.
And blame Alex Jones.
They couldn't blame the shooter.
They couldn't blame mental health.
They couldn't blame school safety.
They couldn't blame big pharma.
And they need it to continue to happen because it's the only way they'll continue to politically profit off of these school shootings.
And that's what's disturbing.
That's what's maybe most unsettling is a case that's about preventing the harm from school shootings and the consequences to vulnerable parents is being used to cover up the true culpable parties for this school shooting and to falsely So this is just bullshit.
I mean, even if you take everything as true that he's saying, which I would say you shouldn't, but even if you do, the trial that's going on isn't about school safety.
It's not about any of this stuff.
It's about the harm that Alex caused to these people by way of his lies about them.
The denial of their children's existence.
Yeah, so I don't know.
I mean, it's interesting to throw a bunch of mud at the wall and see what kind of designs you can make out of it.
Sometimes, like with this clip especially, I feel like you should play that in front of the jury as just, it doesn't get more obvious that there's no other way to stop them than to stop them.
Because the lawyer who started on this case comes back years later during the case, after he was kicked off of it, to do the thing the case is about.
And he was unable to get away with constant lies and the manner and method in which he made his presentation.
And as he couldn't get away with it, in his grandstand vision of this political theater where he's the hero at the end of the documentary and the film, he lost it.
And that's why people watching him are like, hold on a second.
I thought this was about parents.
I thought this was about emotional injury.
I thought this was about undisputed dishonesty.
I'm not seeing any of that.
I'm seeing politics, politics, politics, theater, theater, theater, because that's in fact what the Plaintiffs' Council has always been about.
They have used these parents for the gain of the political class with which they are aligned and the political causes with which they are assigned.
I mean, I don't know what else to say other than if you say the parents are being used by powerful interests, then you are part of the Sandy Hook denial.
Indeed, people were mad at you, calling you Bo Bridges, saying that you were fake, because you were critical of the Sandy Hook denier movement.
For so long and so often, and so many other people were at InfoWarp.
And the reality is the reason why the people went to conspiracy theories in the denier movement was because the politicians in Connecticut were covering up their complicity and culpability in the inadequacy of school safety.
That's why they're destroying the school.
That's why they're hiding information from the Sunshine Laws.
That's why they're not producing information pursuant to Freedom of Information Act or Open Records Act requests.
That triggered a lot of people's conspiracy theories.
They end up being wrong in their conclusion.
But there was, in fact, cover-up taking place by the political class in Connecticut.
And the only case the Connecticut courts didn't allow to go forward was the one that exposed the schools for inadequate school safety.
They allowed $73 million shakedown of a gun manufacturer's insurers, and now they're allowing another effort to...
I want your view on Russia and the economy and Matt Gaetz and the midterms and 45 days and so much more.
But take Elizabeth Williamson.
This woman is a Sandy Hook groupie.
This woman writes her book, tries to make money on Sandy, who accuses me of it.
She goes around for years and says stuff that's not true or twisted about me constantly.
We never really follow her, but yesterday, I'm about to leave the Airbnb I'm at because we decided not to do the cross-examination and just do my own case next week.
She put out a tweet that was essentially saying that Alex could have testified today if he wanted to, but his lawyer said in court that he looked so bad in front of the jury, he needs some time away from them.
I think my main problem with it is that if you accept that what he said has wiggle room, then you are missing that what he said was what Elizabeth said.
If you're going to tell me that there's wiggle room with what he said...
I don't believe that there isn't a world where Norm could believe that he sincerely is saying, I don't want Alex to testify to lower the temperature because he's worried that Maddie is too hot.
It's not a coincidence that Elizabeth Williamson, grifting off of Sandy Hook, Personally profiting off the pain of Sandy Hook would lie and libel about you in a libel trial because it once again reaffirms that if the truth came out, even with a biased jury pool, if the truth came out, they would not get the verdict they want because they've been pitching a fake narrative about this.
They keep talking, I mean, they talk about people sort of harvesting the pain of these families.
Who's harvesting the pain of these families?
It's these plaintiff's lawyers, it's the press, it's Elizabeth Williamson, for their personal and political and partisan profit.
And it's really disgusting to see.
And it's important for people to know out there, to my knowledge, over 90% of the people who have a relative who died at Sandy Hook, they're not suing Alex Jones.
They're not suing Infowar.
The vast mass of people refuse to go along with this case.
Only a small percentage were convinced to go along with this case.
That's another fact he can't have presented to the jury.
And basically, based on the things that we've seen, based on the behaviors, the experiences that people have gone through, I fully fucking understand why someone would choose not to sue Alex.
To my knowledge, over 90% of the people who have a relative who died at Sandy Hook, they're not suing Alex Jones.
They're not suing InfoWard.
The vast mass of people refused to go along with this case.
Only a small percentage were convinced to go along with this case.
That's another fact he can't have presented to the jury.
So it's part of a process where they are the ones responsible for more risk of more mass shootings.
They are the ones responsible for covering up political culpability and complicity and what happened at Sandy Hook where kids' lives could have been saved but weren't because of rogue politicians pocketing money for reasons intended originally for school safety.
They're the ones covering up for Big Pharma and our failed mental health institutions for young men in America.
They're the ones profiting off of all of it.
And they want to blame you for standing up for the Second Amendment.
And they want to blame you for second-guessing what the politicians were doing.
And it exposes what the whole case is really about in a simple nutshell.
You use the pronoun to refer to the people, which is why even if you don't say their names individually, for instance, you didn't say the name of every single person who had a relative at Sandy Hook.
So, sure.
But, however, you did use a collective pronoun to describe all of them, meaning you are talking about them.
So let's raise this in closing and hit the Russian news and let you go.
You've done a great job, Robert Barnes.
You watch the trial.
I don't know if you caught this part.
You covered most of it live, and it was viral.
Chris Maddy, the Democratic Party operative, literally gets up there over an hour and brings up how we gave them total discovery, which we're not allowed to say we gave them discovery, of the 287,000 emails with key search terms they gave.
Weeks after they filed suit on us in 2018, we're sent...
A bunch of emails saying, I want to get you, I want to hurt you, we're going to kill you, Alex Jones, for Sandy Hook.
And embedded, because we're not tech people, there are secret embedded links, just links to child porn.
So we turn the email over, they know how to scan them, and magically find the secret links.
And then Chris Matty gets up there and says, okay, you filed a lawsuit against the Young Turks that you filed, just to get them to stop saying, I'm a child pornographer and all this.
He said, yeah, it's true.
The FBI said you didn't do anything.
It was sent to you.
You didn't open it.
But then an hour later, he says, so you did send child porn.
Let's just admit it.
You did it.
So he wanted to cover himself earlier, knowing for clips on the Internet, they would later say it.
I said, wait, you just said earlier I was innocent.
Matty was asking Alex about how he had sued the Young Turks over statements they'd made about sending child porn to the Sandy Hook plaintiff's lawyers.
This was meant to really make it clear that when he's on the other side of things, Alex fully understands how damaging defamatory claims can be and that he's more than willing to sue people...
for making such claims.
Happily.
unidentified
Maddie was very clear that the FBI had looked into it and the emails hadn't been opened and they were sent to Alex and they were turned over unknowingly, which is why Alex felt in However, if the claim was just that, quote, Alex Jones sent lawyers child porn in emails?
It wasn't intentional, and Alex didn't know what was in the emails, but those emails did get sent from Alex's team to the plaintiffs, and they did contain child porn.
This is what the tweet said that was included in Alex's complaint against the Young Turks, which is why Maddie was making this distinction.
The thing that Alex was suing over was a statement that was technically accurate, but was suggestive in a way that could lead to reputational damage.
This was all to illustrate that Alex's posturing and defiance in this case are decisions that he's making, and that he's more than happy to use the courts as a weapon when he feels aggrieved, even if the technical claim that was being made and being called defamation is, strictly speaking, accurate.
Yeah, I don't know everything that's said in the videos on the Young Turks, because I can't imagine them making the kind of claims that Alex is saying they did.
I was never really sure about what was going on until he waited like 45 minutes an hour and then said, but you did send child porn and looked at the jury.
For a t-shirt, or $100 for this, or $70 for, you know, it varies for a coffee cup.
Everybody watching knows the coffee cup costs $5.
Everybody watching knows the t-shirt costs $6.
With our silver, you know, it costs like 30-something bucks, but, you know, the point is...
Is that it's a memento that you supported and you were part of that.
So the communists have taxpayer money to fund NPR and PBS.
We don't have that.
We don't have big sugar daddies.
We have you.
So that's why it's a fundraiser coin.
If you're a founding member, you can get it for $99.
If you're not a founding member that bought the other three coins or one of the other three coins, it's $130 and the money is needed desperately to fund our operation.
That's why we're signing signed copies of The Great Reset and The War for the World.
For $99, because we need the extra money desperately.
Please don't let me prove how much trouble we're in and how much trouble you're in by us imploding or shutting down.
Yeah, I mean, we've seen this exist, you know, like cults, people who've escaped cults or, you know, like Scientologists and that, like, you know, they'll come back and they'll say, like, the leader of the cult, every day he would just talk.
If you order on Sunday, it'll take a few days to ship your product.
But we are, in many cases, shipping same day for orders at infoworkstore.com or 888-253-3139.
Now, here's Melinda French Gates giving a little speech.
55 seconds.
Here it is.
unidentified
For the tireless work she's doing to help steer the world through COVID-19.
For being an extraordinary champion for global health, and for the immeasurable inspiration she provides to girls and women around the world, including me, I am thrilled to present the 2022 Global Goldkeeper Award to a remarkable leader of our time,