Today, Dan and Jordan welcome back to the show Elizabeth Williamson. The trio chats about the goings-on in the CT trial, including Alex's testimony, Alex's press conferences, and the importance of the 2014 Super Bowl.
My bright spot today, I feel weird about this, but it is I have been trying to find entertainment to watch while I make the buttons and get the buttons out and everything.
And I've watched a few online YouTube videos that are They're basically...
It's people explaining...
Hoax games, like interactive alternative reality games.
So, okay, my bright spot, because I've been all day at the Alex Jones damages trial, at the end of the day, A, in a truly bright spot, the sun came out after raining all day at the end of our day in court, and...
Someone convinced Alex Jones that there was a security threat, and so they prevented him from having a press conference after his meltdown in court.
Even more funny is that he would believe that because when you went outside the courthouse, there was maybe one guy with a microphone, a couple of reputable news trucks.
Yeah, I don't think anyone, if people couldn't be bothered to turn up to support him in court, I'm not sure they could be bothered to turn up to do whatever he was afraid they might do, so.
No, I I actually had this very conversation with another journalist in the elevator deciding not to do one of his press conferences, because the other thing.
He did one yesterday where he did it at the lunch break, but he was late showing up.
And so by the time he started talking, it was almost time for court to begin again.
And so there you're really faced with, you know, the thing that you're absolutely talking about, Jordan, which is...
Do I go into the courtroom and listen to the Sandy Hook families tell their story, or do I sit here outside, stand here, and just listen to this word salad of, you know, repetition that he, you know, I mean, we've all heard it before thousands of times.
You know, do we just listen to Alex Jones gloviate and, you know, deliver what he usually delivers?
Or do you go inside and actually, you know, rejoin the real world?
So one of the things that I think is really tough about that choice that Alex put everyone in by showing up late and having that press conference is that the press conference itself is a disrespect to what's going on in the court.
And then it's forcing people to make this choice between like...
Watching him disrespect the court or go into the court.
I know that we were watching it and the law and crime stream was showing the Alex outside and I'm like, we got a minute left.
Thanks, Dan, because I was going to make that point too before room service came, of course.
And that's that, you know, this whole thing is, this is, as Neil Heslund put it in Austin at the trial he attended, it is an act of cowardice that Alex Jones does not show up in the courtroom for his own trial unless he is compelled to because he has to testify.
So this trial has been going on now for nearly two weeks, and this is the first day he has shown up.
He's been in town for a couple of days, and he's had these press conferences out in front.
And even when he's not in town, he's watching every day on his show, and he's maligning the process, the judge, the proceedings, and setting up a website, as they said in court today, Kangaroo Court, where his viewers can watch and donate to his legal defense.
So, you know, it just is, you know, after the last trial, One of the jurors, it was shared with me, said that his failure to turn up and the fact that he was tearing apart the entire process on his show really pissed off the jurors because it said that he has utter contempt for The judicial process in this country.
And that's really what got him where he is today, right?
It is good to get that confirmation from you just because it's like, while I was watching the trial in Austin, sitting in the courtroom, looking at the jurors, you know, kind of.
But there were some of those moments, like the one that I'll always remember is the guy who was writing notes for the first hour or two of Alex's testimony, just putting his notepad down.
But it's nice to know that that is disrespectful behavior that they do account for, because there is a part of me that's like, I don't know if they would care about that so much.
Yes, he recast what was really a pretty devastating hearing for him earlier this week.
No, that's exactly what we wanted.
We wanted a bankruptcy judge in Texas to remove my lawyer and my chief restructuring officer because that means we'll get additional oversight over free speech systems that we just so dearly need and by someone who is completely unaffiliated, unlike the lawyer and the chief restructuring officer who we removed.
Someone who is completely unrelated to free speech systems.
It's exactly what he wanted for a bankruptcy judge to say something along the lines of, I hope I never have to do something like this in my career again.
But the thing that I also liked, another sort of meta aspect of this whole thing is, so...
One of the things that the bankruptcy judge raised as a lack of candor, a lack of transparency, and a questionable business expense or personal expense, actually, by Jones was the $80,000 dollars that he pulled out of the company to finance his trip here in Connecticut, where he has a cadre of bodyguards.
He said in court today that he took Yeah.
to Waterbury, Connecticut, and rolls up in a fleet of SUVs and is staying at a pretty posh Airbnb a short distance from the courthouse.
Comparatively, we talked to Sebastian on our last episode, and we get kind of a sense of his feeling, but from your perspective, comparing how things are feeling and the vibes in Austin versus Connecticut, what are some of the big takeaways that you're noticing?
It moves more slowly, I think, you know, partly because there are so many plaintiffs in the case.
You know, these are the families of eight Sandy Hook victims plus an FBI agent who is implicated in these, in Jones's bogus, or not only Jones's, but the other conspiracy theorists' bogus theories.
Yeah, really kind of running his words together and doing that sort of...
Thing that he does where he has a whole slur of words together and then he gets to the right place, but it's almost like the connection goes in the middle of the sentence.
Like, you've been in the courtroom, obviously, this entire time, and today's display was one of the more shameful things, I think, that has ever happened.
Like, how does it feel, the just really fucked up, intense hatred it feels like between everybody professionally involved there?
Like, the lawyers, the judge, like, no one's happy, right?
Yeah, it's pretty, yeah, there's definitely a vibe that goes through the room when he was walking in and out.
And I was kind of wondering to myself, you know, especially the first three rows where you have the families and the people close to them, not a lot of love lost there.
And I was wondering, does he thrive on that or does that bother him?
I couldn't really tell.
I mean, is it just any kind of focused attention, whether it's like focused hatred or just neutral attention or admiration?
He'd thrive in situations where he's yelling at people and they're all yelling at him or he's confronting somebody or he's, you know, the years of the bullhorn approaches.
I don't know.
I think he doesn't do that as much now for whatever reason.
But even around the time of the Women's March, he was going out and yelling cupcakes at women.
Yeah, I don't know.
I mean, I think he likes negative attention more, and it's just kind of weird to imagine that it extends to a courtroom and Sandy Hook families.
Well, I guess one of the reasons he's not showing up in court, I mean, I think that kind of negative attention where he's yelling at someone and they're trying to yell back and he's drowning them out is kind of what he's used to.
But to be sitting, you know, in a place where people are just quiet and actually very dignified, but also hating him nonetheless might be disconcerting.
Like, I mean, if I put myself in this space and if I walked into court, I would feel like psychically like I had handcuffs on, regardless of what courtroom I was walking into for whatever purpose.
It's just that's what it associates in my brain.
Handcuffs mean half as much to Alex as not being able to scream what he wants to at somebody.
So, like, if I were going to diagnose what his main issue, I don't think he cares about the attention so much as when he's talking, he's not allowed to say what he wants to, and it's going to drive him insane, you know?
You could almost feel that Resistance breaking down or whatever, you know, whatever wall there was of like, all right, I'm not going to ramble off a bunch of nonsense.
And then at some point, just yeah, like tea kettle boiling, like you called it.
And it's just like that end of the day today was bananas.
Yeah, I don't know what I don't know how to put it like it's it was so unnerving.
It didn't feel good.
I keep saying that I feel unsafe watching this trial, and I just felt like I don't know what's going to happen.
Things don't feel in control.
Norm clearly doesn't have any kind of a handle on Alex.
You're basically, your objections, first of all, your client is ignoring you.
You know, when your own lawyer objects, you stop talking and you wait for a ruling because chances are you're not going to have to answer the question, right?
He just kept talking.
It didn't matter if Norm was objecting.
It didn't matter if Norm's objections were sustained, which meant that Alex wouldn't have to answer the question.
Alex just kept rolling because what he was doing was looking for an opportunity to break the rules against making this a political...
He's not supposed to talk about electoral politics, presidential politics, or political figures.
He's not supposed to make this a partisan thing.
He was absolutely looking for every opportunity to slip that in there.
He's not supposed to talk about his First Amendment rights.
He's not supposed to talk about his bankruptcy.
He's got a lot of, you know, you use the term handcuffs.
He's got a lot of handcuffs on him.
But he's determined to try and bust through all of them.
So that was all he was looking for.
And then Norm was just sort of, you know, I'm going to show Alex that I'm objecting, objecting, objecting as the family's lawyer is going after him.
So it just got to the point where he was just shouting objection.
You know, if you would have stopped him and said, what are you objecting to?
I don't think he would have had an answer because he was just adding to the general tumult in the room.
And then, for no reason, when the back-and-forth exchange was happening towards the end, Alex said something along the lines of, you liberals wanted to kill everybody in Iraq.
Yeah, I mean, I think based on the way that I'm interpreting what you're saying and my experience was with the jury and Alex is just like, I feel like in his mind, in a murder trial, all you have to do is convince one member of the jury of like...
You know, reasonable, not guilty, that kind of thing.
And in my mind, what I'm seeing him do is, like, we've seen politics override everybody's thoughts to the point where sometimes...
You know, you see people say absolutely insane shit just because it's like, I'm with this team.
I'm with the Republican team, you know?
And it would make sense that he would think, you know, if I can get a couple of these conservatives to completely remove any and all independent thought, which is possible, then maybe he can get out of it.
Alex talks about this and has historically for a long time.
There is a philosophy of jury nullification that has to do with usually in criminal things like, well, if the jury doesn't think what you did was wrong, they can find you innocent even if they know you're guilty.
No, I think everybody knows that the Constitution wanted the jury to take the law into their own hands, ignore the judge and the lawyers, and just think about who's on their team.
because, you know, it wasn't just, I mean, the outburst at the end and the craziness got all the attention, but, you know, Throughout, he was completely mendacious, and he was pretending that he really didn't know what was going on on his show.
You know, everything about, you know, this headline.
Oh, they did it.
They put that up.
Oh, somebody might have.
And, you know, at the same time, you had Infowars employees who have been deposed under oath, and they have said, Alex Jones calls all the shots, you know, for better or worse, usually for worse.
Yeah, so the idea that he wasn't sure what was going on in his own shop consistently...
I hope, I mean, I don't know if I hope, I don't know what I hope, or if I hope it at all, but I kind of hope there was a bit of under-the-table money going there.
I think today, obviously, the big thing is this outburst and how the day ended.
But I actually think that there was maybe the most important thing that came out of today was the questioning about Matthew Mills, the guy who interrupted the Super Bowl interview.
And one of the reasons that I think this was so important, just to give a short breakdown of what it is, Alex had Matthew Mills on his show, who was the guy who, it was the 2014 Super Bowl, I believe.
That he, Matthew Mills, was arrested later for harassing the Soto family members at their charity 5K.
The reason I think this is so critical is that it draws this straight line between Alex endorsing, offering to hire, congratulating this person who was doing essentially...
I mean, how is it any different than harassing people at the 5K?
I mean, he, the fact that this is what I didn't catch, even when I was writing my book, you know, I wrote, I put an entry in about Matthew Mills and what happened at the 5K.
But I did not know that on Infowars, you know, Joan said, and they played that clip, you know, I've got some other disruption I want to, and I'm paraphrasing here, but I've got some other disruption I want to talk to you about offline.
And this, you know, this disruption of the 5K came after that.
So whether it was exactly that or not, and of course, Joan said it wasn't.
It does, as you say, Dan, draw that line.
And one of the challenges here for the lawyers in this particular case is that...
Very few of these plaintiffs have been named by Alex Jones on the show, and it's harder to draw that direct line.
So this, I thought, I agree.
This was really kind of a revelation.
I didn't know he had had that guy on, celebrated him, and then he went on to disrupt that event for Vicki Soto, the teacher who was killed at Sandy Hook.
I don't know, maybe primary defenses, but one of the things that's thrown around a lot is even if people were harassed, it has nothing to do with me.
You can't draw the line with me.
And I think that this case of the Matthew Mills thing is so damning because it disrupts that argument.
And it's not just somebody who maybe emailed Alex or that tenuous connection.
This person had Alex's full-throated support and job offer, and they conspired on air about the behavior that is the disruption of the 5K, whether or not they actually conspired and Alex paid him to do that.
Leaving that aside, they had a conversation about him being employed to do basically that.
If Alex can just yell Jussie Smollett whenever anybody says he makes things up, then why can't everybody just yell Matthew Mills at him whenever he's like, you can't connect me to any of this behavior.
Yeah, I'm just very hopeful that I'm sure the jury does understand the importance of that, but they see that and the disrespect Alex has for the process, and that really does sort of inform their understanding of the case.
You know, I think we already said it.
The way he's acting, it's like, why did you get defaulted?
And then his whole thing of, you know, disagreeing with Clint Watts, who was the social media expert who said that, you know, at minimum over the, you know, six years...
You know, from the time of the shooting, that 550 million page views of Alex Jones' Sandy Hook content came via social media.
And Jones turned that into 550 million in his press conference yesterday, 500 or earlier than the week, 550 million people.
There aren't that many.
People in the English-speaking world, you know, it wasn't 550 million people.
So what you're saying is we need to test whether or not they can respond to English words in order to see whether or not they are capable of being in the English-speaking world.
So, speaking of English-speaking and reading world, I ran into a couple who run an antique bookstore very near the courthouse, and I was chatting with them, and the wife and the couple said, you know, we were thinking that, you know, the local newspaper interviewed me about the trial coming to town and saying, is this going to boost the fortunes of the local merchants?
And she was like, she goes, hello, a trial of a conspiracy theorist in Waterbury is going to boost the fortunes of an antiquarian bookstore.
Do you really think any of us fans are spending much time in a store like ours?
And they must...
Be reading the newspaper because she got a bunch of abuse after that article came out.
We should probably wrap this up here before too long because you've been so kind with your time and you have the room service there that I don't want to keep you from it.
I mean, we're talking about this and there are a lot of moments where you just go, oh my God.
But I have to say, there is one aspect to this that really does bother me.
And that's that...
This absolute circus that's been happening in the courtroom.
And just every time they bring up an Infowars video, I just look at these families and I think, you know, this is yet one more, you know, like mountain of abuse and disrespect.
And it just that that part is really disturbing.
You know, I mean, it's just.
Day after day, having them sit there, they're carrying that loss wherever they go.
And to be sitting there and watching this all unfold has got to be...
I could feel through the screen a little bit of, in some of the testimonies of the plaintiffs, an almost disbelief that People are acting the way Alex and the defense are acting.
Yeah, this idea of like, okay, and they've expressed this, several of the family members who have testified already, and I'm sure more will express this.
Just this idea of, I...
There has been so much unbelievable and not in a good way.
You know, just this idea of like, I can't believe any of this happened.
And now this, you know, seriously, there are people who actually say that my child or my wife or my mom or my sister didn't die.
You know, if only, as one of the moms put it, you know, if only.
Wouldn't that be amazing if that actually didn't happen?
But just that idea of, like, okay, just getting your mind around the fact that this unbelievable loss has occurred, and then there are a significant number of people saying that it never happened, and it just, you know, and so to have to, like, wade through that.
Today, a guy came into the courtroom and he was hushed by the bailiff because he said...
Is this a First Amendment trial?
And I thought, uh-oh.
And then they played the tape of Robbie Parker reminiscing about his daughter Emily the night after she was killed at Sandy Hook in the press conference that we all know about because Joan spent the next several years using it as fodder on his show and calling Robbie an actor.
But the guy behind me starts snickering during this press conference.
And a lot of the families were...
We're weeping.
It's one of those, you know, kind of outpourings that no matter how many times you see it, you think, oh, my God, you just feel his pain.
And he's offering forgiveness to the gunman, which is just amazing.
And so a lot of people were pretty emotional.
And here's this doofus behind me, snickering and going.
Well, it's the proof of the argument of the case, essentially, that you use this fear and you use these tactics in order to get people into a mindset.
Where they're willing to do things like show up at a courtroom where grieving family members are having their day in court and say things like, this is so fake.