Jordan Holmes and Dan Friesen dissect Alex Jones’ April 25, 2022 episode, where he falsely claimed a "90% depopulation" plan by 2030, citing misrepresented works like Limits to Growth (1972) and fabricated passages from H.G. Wells. Jones tied unrelated events—like a self-immolation protest—to globalist conspiracies, conflating COVID, climate change, and election fraud with baseless theories such as the "Committee of 300" or "Operation Lockstep." Roger Stone joined to push fringe right-wing victories, predicting a September 2022 pandemic to justify voting restrictions, while Jones promoted InfoWars merchandise. Their unverified claims reveal a pattern of fearmongering over decades, undermining credibility despite legal battles and past failed doomsday forecasts. [Automatically generated summary]
And it's about that spiritualism era right now that I've always found incredibly fascinating whenever so many fucking mediums were going around like it's fine.
Something hit me last night and this morning while I was reading all the news and looking at the research.
And something we've really talked about quite a bit here on air in the past, but we're now here.
And I really think I should take today out to really thank you all and to tell you that I really appreciate you because we could be off the air at any moment.
You could be plunged into a massive power outage that will be the beginning of martial law.
And we will be in the next phase of the New World Order, the purposeful collapse of civilization and massive at least 90% depopulation in the next eight years.
I mean, it does seem like the normal outburst of how we're all going to die comes from whenever he's having a bad day and has lost in some fashion, usually in the court system.
This sounds like he's saying goodbye through this medium of dance, I suppose.
I have a working theory that is Alex realized that maybe this bankruptcy thing isn't going to work.
And that maybe the fact that the U.S. trustees have written this letter of objection to his use of the bankruptcy system, this could trigger some kind of examination of his use of bankruptcy, which could lead to even more trouble.
It does seem impossible for you to look at the IPCC reports where scientists are getting, are waxing philosophical about what it would be like to live on a planet that functions and then see Biden being like, well, I mean, yeah, drilling is great, but not this way.
I mean, like, obviously, maybe the person who was in the Easter Bunny suit at the White House's celebration wasn't a random person who plays an Easter Bunny.
Maybe that was like a Secret Service agent or something.
Yeah, I mean, I think that's just kind of an offshoot of his whole thing where it's like really easy to be better than your enemy when your enemy is the fucking devil.
It's a live emergency broadcast, live Monday emergency broadcast.
An international cult of transhumanist environmentalist terrorists are sabotaging civilization.
Tune in and learn how to stop them.
InfoWars has confirmed that a multinational authoritarian cult is actively attacking every facet of the planet's supply chain.
The Debos Group is the mouthpiece of this psychotic, multinational, corporate-backed post-humanist revolution.
I think you now realize that when I would read out of Club of Rome and UN documents and Operation Watchstep from the Rockefeller Foundation and British Ministry of Defense reports, where they predicted, because they were laying all this out, this would be unfolding by the year 2020.
And now we're two plus years into it.
That I wasn't making it up and I wasn't exaggerating.
So the first thing to point out here is that this headline is a farce.
InfoWars hasn't confirmed shit yet.
They're running a headline as if they're doing some real reporting here.
This is just shit talking being presented as fact delivery.
Second, none of the documents that Alex is referencing at the end there have anything to do with backing up his claims.
Operation Lockstep isn't a real thing.
In that document from the Rockefeller Foundation exercise, the pandemic that's involved in the lockstep scenario, it begins in 2012.
The depiction of the situation that this imagined future involves, it does extend to 2026, where the last event mentioned is protesters in Nigeria overthrowing their government.
Along the way, the document explicitly mentions some fictional things that never happened, which Alex, I'd love to hear him explain.
For instance, in 2013, cellular networks completely crash.
Or in 2017, quote, Italy addresses immigrant caregiver gap with robots.
So we've been over this, but it always needs to be called out that Alex is maliciously lying and making things up about a scenario exercise about technological advancement in the developing world so it will work better as a thing to scare his listeners with.
The Club of Rome document he's talking about is limits to growth, which I know because it's literally the only Club of Rome publication he's ever mentioned.
Limits to Growth was written in 1972, and I'm certain Alex has never read it because it's a very detailed breakdown of various factors that the authors believed would be contributors to limiting the carrying capacity of the planet.
These involve things like pollution, but they also touch on the total amount of arable land versus demand for food, and like things like known quantities of finite resources versus the increasing demand as population goes up.
In each case, they have estimates for the points at which these lines intersect on a graph, but they're also very clear that these are based on trends continuing and that some of the factors aren't even predictable.
Even so, they conclude that without any major changes, we'll hit a resource crunch within 100 years or by 2072.
Alex is just making up that they predicted that the crisis would be in 2020 because it better suits his purposes now, but it has no connection to reality.
Another book on this kind of theme that Alex might be referencing is Paul Ehrlich's 1968 population bomb, but that wasn't affiliated with the Club of Rome.
That book brings up some valid points, but a number of the predictions in it were not good.
Still, none of them involve 2020.
Ehrlich thought doom was coming by the 1980s.
Alex is casually referencing these documents to give his career full of failed doomsday predictions the appearance of being something researched and scholarly.
This shitty saying means nothing.
He's just trying to trick the audience into thinking there's more behind his words than just some idiot's imagination, which is really all that's going on.
Yeah.
And of course, prophetic dreams he's had and weird visions.
A dream informed by growing up in a John Birch society household where he read these fucked up books at like age 12 and then just internalized them into his worldview.
Also, Looking Forward to the End of Humanity was an op-ed that actually makes the opposite point that Alex thinks it does because he's only read the headline.
And Yuval Noah Harari is a historian and futurist that Alex has recently decided that he's going to pretend as the globalist soothsayer.
If I had to guess, this is because Ray Kurzweil hasn't said anything weird in a while.
So Alex had to find a new character to fill that gap.
Wynne Bruce was the name of the man who self-immolated in front of the Supreme Court building recently, hoping to bring attention to the climate crisis.
Though he was passionate about climate change, Bruce's action has nothing to do with Klaus Schwab or the globalists.
It's a desperate act meant to bring into focus the severity of the issues that he cares about.
He's not the only person to do this, even if you exclude all of the cases of protest outside the United States.
For instance, David Buckle died by self-immolation as a protest about the climate in 2018.
This is basically Alex's way of not taking Bruce's action seriously by pretending it's part of some grand conspiracy and then by making a glib joke about how his self-immolation requires fossil fuels.
Alex is doing this because on some level, he can't even imagine having the conviction about something it would take to self-immolate to protest a serious cause because he's just pretending.
But honestly, I really think that this line of rhetoric is pretty dangerous because I think that there's really only a couple directions you can go with it.
The first is doomsday prepping, and maybe you and your family run to the woods.
Well, the second thing, I think you could lead people to a state of real terror, and maybe they would consider ending their life because what's coming could be something so horrible.
I might not be right with the title, but the famous ending is the guy is with his family in the truck, and he kills his wife and daughter to save them from the horrors, and he's about to kill himself.
The mist parts, and he can see people coming towards him.
And then the other alternative is like, well, if the globalists' plans are unstoppable, I'm dead.
My life is already over.
If I can do something that will possibly make less people die, why would I not engage in a suicide bombing against the World Economic Forum or something like that?
Why wouldn't you do that if the globalists are going to kill off billions of people within the next eight years?
It's unstoppable, the plans that they've put in place.
The information war, quite frankly, has no more purpose.
Nope.
There is no reason to be engaging in politics.
There is no reason to be engaging even in culture stuff.
Yeah, I don't understand how you can be really concerned with the imagination of slow erosion of civilization when it's a couple years left and then the globalists are going to kill everybody off.
It is an excuse for people in the audience to carry out violent actions if they are so inclined.
And Alex fucking believes that all these people actually believe him.
And then like, okay, look, the amount of money that Elon Musk has, for instance, Alex also has been saying that Elon Musk really believes in him and he's fighting the globalists and he's on Team Alex.
You know, all this.
So the money that Joe Rogan and Elon Musk have, they could get him out of trouble in a heartbeat.
And if it were legitimately and anybody believed that it was a matter of life and death that Alex be on the air, it would be so easy for him to raise this money from these right-wing ding-dongs and people he associates with.
And I told you two-plus years ago they would start environmental lockdowns once you were trained to live under the viral lockdown.
And now India and Italy have announced lockdowns, rationing, electricity only certain times of day to, quote, save the earth.
And because, quote, the resources have been cut off from COVID, which wasn't COVID, but was the globalist using that as the pretext to destroy the global infrastructure.
Alex is exaggerating an amendment to an Italian government energy decree that hasn't been fully vetted by the parliament yet.
If it passes, it would require that in the summer you not have your AC set lower than 25 degrees Celsius and in the winter you can't set your heat above 21 degrees Celsius.
This is not a climate-related issue, nor is it even connected to COVID.
And it has to do with a sharp drop in gas supplies in Italy that comes from not dealing with Russia.
40% of Italian oil comes from Russia, so there's a considerable hit that they're taking, but they're trying to find ways to make this work.
The temperature decrees are one such effort, although I don't believe for a second that there will be a way that they could make this enforceable at all.
But as a way to make up for the lost imports, also, they're trying to cut new deals with the Republic of Congo and Angola to try and find some more resources.
As for India, Alex doesn't even flash up a headline on screen with that one or cite a source, so I'm kind of left to my own devices to figure out what he's talking about.
Last October, there was a big deal with Indian power plants saying that they only had an average of four days' worth of coal in stock, which was due to a much larger constellation of influences than just COVID or any of this shit.
I don't like Alex bringing up India on his show just because it's so vast and complicated that even if he studied it in real terms, he would be completely and woefully incapable of talking about it.
If we're able to model it, break it down, chronicle it, and then get leaders who are compartmentalized to wake up.
It could have been stopped.
But now the collapse is unfolding.
And so now it's even more desperate that we warn everybody so they understand that those initiating the collapse and admitting they're doing it in their white papers are now the ones that are going to preside over the crisis and pose as the savior and just put out the cover story to the dumbed-down public, to the very simplistic public, to the one-dimensional public.
Oh, there's deadly viruses because of global warming.
Oh, there's collapse of the food chain because of global warming.
Oh, we've got to do all this because of you're bad.
Humans are bad.
And then they have the organized, collapse, depopulation, and total transhumanist takeover of whoever's left at the end of that beyond dystopic system that they have initiated.
Nothing in that clip has any relationship to reality.
It's all just Alex expressing his feelings of preemptive distrust about world events that haven't even happened yet and may not.
In the real world, there are very complete explanations for how changing climate has severe consequences in terms of famines and droughts.
So if there is a drought, scientists can say it was caused by climate change, and Alex can say it's a giant conspiracy proven by imaginary white papers, and then we reach an impasse.
As for the new exotic illnesses, it's super clear the role climate change has on that with animal habitats being altered, causing them to migrate to new areas and increasing the likelihood that they make contact with people where they wouldn't have otherwise.
This necessarily increases the odds that new viruses and bacteria can be exchanged, and from there, the potential for new outbreaks goes up.
Alex can sell his audience on his explanations for everything because his explanation for everything is the same.
It's all the globalists.
They're doing everything, and it's totally definitively proven in this document that Alex refuses to speak specifically about almost as if it doesn't exist.
And Alex doesn't want the audience to realize he's making all this shit up.
This is the same sort of dynamic he has with the prospect of climate refugees.
It's a preemptive explanation that it's all just the globalists, it's a conspiracy to attack all of us.
And there are just these things that are likely outcomes of the trends that we're seeing with the climate.
Whether it's a change in the amount of usable land that we have for farming or the likelihood of encountering species that could introduce new viruses and bacteria to these are real things.
He's created a preemptive excuse where it's all a conspiracy and it's all bullshit.
They write the articles all over the control corporate press about looking forward to the end of humanity in the Wall Street Journal, NBC News, the Times of London.
That's why they have articles everywhere saying we need dictatorship.
This is hundreds of years of preparation and waiting and training and building their networks while they were rich and powerful presiding over humanity.
And now that we're entering the genesis of our next level, super technology, life extension, secrets of the universe, they want to gum everybody down further, kill everybody so that the general public does not have access to this because they know time and time again, out of the mass of the public, which on average is simple and dumbed down, super geniuses come out of those groups that innovate and always overthrow the previous elites.
Then they become decadent generationally and the cycle continues.
So now the story is that the globalists don't want all of us in the cheap seats getting our hands on life extension technology and they're going to need to kill off all the population because from the multitudes of the stupid masses, they fear that a super genius will arise to take down their system.
And I'm going to guess right now that Alex thinks he's that super genius.
And I just want to touch on the articles that Alex mentioned at the top of the clip.
The first is that op-ed that Alex hasn't read but likes to say the title, and the other has to do with dictators.
This is Alex referencing an op-ed in Bloomberg titled, To Save Democracy, We Need a Few Good Dictators.
This was written by Robert Kaplan.
And if Alex knew anything about him, he'd know that Kaplan has been saying shit like this for over a decade.
Just a quick Google search turned up an article that he wrote in 2012 for Stratford named Good Mideast Dictators.
Kaplan isn't calling for a dictatorship in the United States.
His point is specifically about less developed countries and how oftentimes for citizens in those countries, the democratic process is less important than achieving fundamental rights and things that could be achieved within the context of greater stability.
I think a lot of his points are half-cooked at best, but Alex is absolutely misusing the headline of this opinion piece that he definitely didn't read so he can use it for his own purposes, which is his MO.
I mean, if I remember, Kaplan, I've read some of that crap, and it's essentially like his shitty argument is like, right now, dictatorships are bad, that we want to get them towards a democratic system.
So we need some sort of philosopher king to bridge the gap between dictator and democracy.
I haven't read all of his articles, but the sense that I got was generally speaking that like a functioning democracy can grow out of stability and a strong institutional base.
But that is something that a lot of developing countries don't generally have when democracies are attempted.
Right.
And so I think that how he would put it is that a dictatorship would allow these countries to solidify, create better institutions, and then from there go into a democracy.
I don't know if I agree with this.
I don't know, but it's not the point that Alex is trying to make it out to be.
Where there's a corporate total control over biological reproduction, over your mind, surveilling everything you do, so that the human system as we know it is ended because the Carnegie endowment that runs the CIA today at the end of World War I, I'm sorry, elections, was given the charter to end war.
And the answer was end men and women in the family, end all of human competition, to create a corporate, medical, biomedical tyranny over the public where humans are produced that are even allowed to live that are not purely human, but are chimeric species corporately owned.
And you see that, of course, in Brave New World published in 1931.
The brother of Huxley, Julian Huxley, Aldous Huxley's brother, goes on to create the UN, run the UN for two decades, create the transhumanist movement, launch the Tavistock Institute, the transgender system, all of it.
Alex is just talking out of his ass here, trying to grasp at whatever straws he thinks he can pull to sound like he's making a real point.
First problem is that he has no idea what the end of history refers to.
That term comes from a book written in 1992 by Francis Fukuyama.
The central thesis of the book is that no political philosophy is better than liberal democracy and that all human history is bending toward a greater number of people in the world living under liberal democracies.
The end of history is the state when all countries are democracies.
The rest of that clip may as well have just been word salad with Alex just free associating as best as he can, but there's a few quick points I want to bring up.
Two, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace did not decide to end war by ending men and women in the family and all that shit.
Carnegie was actually also a fan of competition.
Alex is confusing him with John D. Rockefeller, who said competition is a sin.
Three, the Carnegie Endowment didn't propose making the plot of Brave New World into a reality.
Four, Julian Huxley didn't found the UN.
He was the first Secretary General of the United Nations Educational and Scientific Organization, or UNESCO, a position he was in for two years, not 20.
Five, Julian Huxley didn't found the Tavistock Institute.
Six, Alex is confusing the Tavistock Institute and the Tavistock Clinic.
The clinic has a history of being involved in providing healthcare surrounding trans issues, whereas the Tavistock Institute is the center of a ton of dumb conspiracy theories.
The Institute is involved in research and projects largely relating to social sciences, so people have connected them to pretty much every conspiracy you can come up with.
When the Institute spun off from the clinic in 1947, the clinic remained as part of the NHS.
Those are six massive problems of the fun conspiracy that Alex is just riffing out on the show.
But if you're just passively listening to this and thinking Alex knows what he's talking about, it sounds like this guy really has put the pieces together, but it's total bullshit.
I was listening to that and I was like, keeping count.
That was like a greatest hits in one sentence of the things that even I remember as being like, the moment he said Tavistock, I was like, nope, he got it wrong again every time.
Until the day we die, he's not going to understand Tavistock.
I want to get into the current collapse mechanisms that are taking place and then the different pieces of how they're trying to outlaw dissent and silence any opposition ahead of this takeover.
But if we expose the globalist agenda and the WEF's agenda, then they're not going to get away with their final goal of using this collapse to totally depopulate and enslave us forever.
It'll be their waterloo and a new awakening and renaissance.
I guess it is kind of stoppable, but I mean, the way he's still presenting this is like, yeah, we're all going to die, but if we do the right things afterwards, we'll be fine.
He's Harry Seldon pulling some foundation bullshit on us, and the collapse will only be a thousand years instead of the 10,000 that has been prescribed.
I really didn't have an introduction into politics, but I had learned a lot of things from Alex Jones up front, and everything that he was telling me was not false.
The people who condemn him and say that he's a crazy conspiracy theorist do not listen to his show every single day because I worked for him for two and a half years.
I didn't know the three branches of government when I started.
That's going to be, I think, probably a deal breaker if I'm running a news and political themed thing.
I would be like, well, maybe learn a little bit more and reapply.
I don't think that you can handle this.
But I think for Alex, it's actually perfect because she then knows so little that you get to inform all of her opinions and ideas about what is real and what is not.
Look at the fact that right now, Tucker, so many in conservative media who wouldn't even mention Alex Jones' name now say his name on a regular basis.
Oh, Alex Jones is right.
Alex Jones is right.
We see this constantly, okay?
The people in the conservative media or in the right wing even will not latch on to a specific narrative or tell the truth until it goes mainstream and they're allowed to do it.
So even in the conservative right-wing faction, the reason why we lose is because we continue to wait for the left, the liberal media, the mainstream media to allow us to tell us when we are allowed to tell the truth.
I mean, what I would have said very clearly is just, hey, Tucker, you've had plenty of InfoWars employees on your show in the past few years since Alex has been kicked off.
Why haven't you referenced them as InfoWars under their credits?
Now, the reason I think he doesn't have Alex on himself is that maybe he realizes that that would be a disservice to trying to rehab Alex's information.
If you go back to shows we did 28 years ago, 25 years ago, 20 years ago, we talked about the plan to take over the infrastructure to slowly destroy civilization and to create a global collapse crisis out of which the one world government would take over.
This is a fairly generous way to sum up Alex's career, and I will grant that these are all themes that he's fiddled with throughout his time on air, but I have some serious problems with how this is being discussed.
The first is that he's being so vague as to render what he's saying meaningless.
You could define anything as slowly destroying society and then give yourself an unearned pat on the back.
The second problem is more serious, and that is that Alex didn't say that the globalists are trying to orchestrate a collapse for the past 28 years.
He said that specific things that have happened were the globalists trying to orchestrate a collapse that never came over and over and over.
Every year was the summer of rage.
Back when Alex was hawking Ted Anderson's gold, every single comment from the Fed and every geopolitical issue was proof that the globalists are about to crash the dollar, so you should probably buy some gold.
In the time Alex has been on air, there have even been actual collapses, and we've recovered from them, which shouldn't have happened if they were truly the globalist plots to bring in their one world government.
After 2008, 2009, it should have been over, and yet it wasn't.
This clip here, where he's talking about how he doesn't deserve credit for the revelations he's had throughout his career, is a way for him to weave into getting into some of his major sources throughout his career.
And I'm going to take them one by one because I think it's a pretty shocking list.
And Alex definitely wouldn't cop to some of this at other points in his career.
So John Coleman is not a name that you hear Alex throw around much.
And maybe part of that would have to do with the fact that Alex would sound a bit crazy if he did.
Coleman wrote a book in 1992 called Conspirators Hierarchy, The Story of the Committee of 300.
I can find no evidence that he's actually a former MI6, and given the track record of people who we run into from this show, I don't accept lofty resumes without some sort of verification.
It's possible that he was actually an agent, and I'll assume it is true because I don't care to fight.
So I decided to take a little look at this book, and immediately I had some problems.
In the introduction, Coleman is explaining that he came to the United States in 1969, and no one knew about all these secret societies that he was talking about.
So he put out a little tape to educate folks.
Then people started dropping all these names that like, you know, like they knew shit about the Venetian black nobility.
They didn't know anything about them.
This leads him to say, quote, I consoled myself with the thought that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
I pursued my investigations, pressing on in the face of severe risks, attacks on myself and my wife, financial losses, continual harassment, threats, and calumny, all part of a carefully crafted and orchestrated program to discredit me, run by government agents and informers, embedded in the so-called Christian right wing, the identity movement, and right-wing patriotic groups.
These agents operated and still operate under cover of strong and fearless outspoken opposition to Judaism, their main enemy, they would have us believe.
So if I understand correctly, these agents were sent into Christian identity movement type groups to discredit Coleman, and they maintained their cover by being really anti-Semitic so they would fit in.
Quote, these agent informers are led and controlled by a group of homosexuals who are well-liked and well-respected by political and religious conservatives all across the United States.
At one point, Coleman claims that the Tavistock Institute created the Beatles in order to introduce destructive ideas into American culture, such as the words cool and teenager.
I was looking over his references page in his book, and I noticed a strange quote he was taking from an H.G. Wells book that seemed to be kind of foundational in terms of his argument that this committee of 300 had plans to kill everyone.
Coleman writes, quote, in this work, Wells describes how the new world order, which he calls the new republic, useless eaters, excess population will be getting rid of.
So, you know, they're going to kill off everybody.
He cites this as coming from the open conspiracy, but it actually comes from another book altogether.
It's from the book Anticipations, which doesn't have quite as useful of a title.
The premise of anticipations is Wells dealing with future predictions.
Like one of the big ones is the invention and proliferation of the automobile.
And he predicts some stuff in this book, like that we're going to build a ton of roads and that cities will become more distributed, basically what we now call the suburbs.
Quote, they will hold, I anticipate, that a certain portion of the population, a small minority, for example, afflicted with indisputably transmittable diseases, with transmissible mental disorders, such as the hideous, incurable habits of mind as the craving for intoxication, exist only on sufferance, out of pity and patience, and on the understanding that they do not propagate.
And I don't foresee any reason to suppose that they will hesitate to kill when that sufferance is abused.
I bring this up because this is a huge knock on Coleman's book.
A giant part of the whole conspiracy thing is that H.G. Wells' book proves that the elites plan to kill everyone off, and he gets the book wrong.
And it's not just in the reference pages.
When he's talking about the Committee of 300, he says, quote, it strives towards a one-world government, rather well described by one of its late members, H.G. Wells, in his work commissioned by the committee, which Wells boldly called the open conspiracy.
So the open conspiracy has a better name, and it was written 27 years later when Wells was in full swing in his philosophy career.
So it seems worse that he would be writing that kind of shit at that point.
I think that's part of this.
At this point, Coleman does something really sneaky, though, in the text.
He's established a pattern of presenting quotes from other texts in italics.
So he includes a mostly benign passage from Wells, then says, quote, like George Orwell's 1984, Wells's account is a mass appeal for a one-world government.
Summarized, the intent and purpose of the Committee of 300 is to bring to pass the following conditions.
After this point, there are three and a half full pages of italic text, which is obviously meant to give the appearance that this is something that Wells had written.
Yep, the passage is as follows: quote, at least 4 billion useless eaters shall be eliminated by the year 2050 by means of limited wars, organized epidemics of fatal, rapid-acting diseases, and starvation.
Energy, food, and water shall be kept at subsistence levels for the non-elite, starting with the white populations of Western Europe and North America and then spreading to other races.
The population of Canada, Western Europe, and United States will be decimated more rapidly than on other continents until the world's population reaches a manageable level of 1 billion.
With 500 million will consist of Chinese and Japanese races, selected because they are people who have been regimented for centuries and who are accustomed to obeying authority without question.
I mean, you know, it is one of those things where it is so fascinating because we get to the, you find the progenitor of these things and it fucks you up because you kind of don't think these things have a real beginning.
You know, like they just kind of congeal.
You know, like the first time I found out Dusty Baker invented the high five.
Oh, I don't know if he actually was the original progenitor of these ideas.
But in his book, which is this revelation, and a lot of this traces back, like a lot of things, especially this H.G. Wells quotation being misused, it traces back to him, but he may have gotten it from some newsletter or something.
So according to his profile on the Air Force's website, Benton Parton was a, quote, deputy for systems, aeronautical systems division at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.
In 1955, he did an exchange program with the Ballistics Research Laboratories, where he worked on an armament project, which led to him being assigned to the Air Weapons Directorate as a, quote, assistant for advanced weapons concepts.
By 1970, he was the commander of the Air Force Armaments Laboratories.
So there's definitely some truth that he had experience in this area and had a pretty good resume.
That said, I can find no evidence that he was in any secret space program, but I guess if I could, then it wouldn't be so secret.
Anyway, I have no idea what else Parton has told Alex, but his real claim to fame and main significance to the conspiracy world is that he insisted that the Oklahoma City bombing couldn't have been caused by McVeigh's bomb.
He tried to present his evidence to a grand jury, and they were not impressed and said, no, thank you.
All the same, he became a huge hero in the right-wing militia-type community because he lends an air of credibility to the theory that they need to be accepted to blame someone else for Timothy McVay's terrorism.
I've dabbled in Parton's stuff, and I don't really take any of it very seriously.
And I don't know how much he has to say outside of the OKC stuff.
So there's a weird inclusion in the list, unless Alex is just trying to come up with the most credible-sounding people that he's been able to get to be on his show.
However, he completely threw away his reputation by his insistence on fueling the fires of the satanic panic in general and the McMartin preschool case in specific.
We've gone over Ted a bit in the past, so I'm going to let this be a brief synopsis.
Ted was a craven, opportunistic lunatic whose actions hurt countless people.
And it makes sense that Alex is all reverent of him, though, since all Alex is doing is trying to profit off another satanic panic.
He's just trying to pull a Gunderson without having an impressive FBI resume to throw away doing it.
The reason he's getting chills is because he's finally just letting it out and expressing what he's believed all along, but tried to pretend he didn't.
For most of his career, Alex pretended not to be into the John Birch Society because he knew damn well that if he said that he was so deeply inspired by them, he would be seen as a bircher and no one would take him seriously because people were aware of the John Birch Society and thought they were a bunch of assholes.
People also correctly knew that they were an extremely right-wing organization.
There was no way to pretend to be above the left-right paradigm if everyone knew you were a bircher.
That would essentially brand you accurately as a fringe right-wing figure.
And then all the criticisms of people like Bush that you're making would be better understood for what they were.
Alex hid that stuff because it was important to his career and critical to him being taken at all seriously by anybody in the 90s.
Now, most of the idiots mindlessly tweeting Alex Jones was right memes probably have no idea who the Birchers were or what they stood for, so it's pretty much safe for him to come clean.
I mean, I think he was fairly open to that before, but if you say that you're a big fan of the John Birch Society and they were 100% right, you are also saying that we should live in a white male-dominated society purely of Protestant Christians.
So after giving it up, relatively speaking, in my world, Somali pirates of existence, Alex brings up that he couldn't go on air last segment, and that's why he played those videos.
And so I knew that the world's elite were planning this, and I knew that if we warned people, we would have a chance to stop it.
But I also thought about looking out into the future, what it would be like if we failed to stop the initiation of their final plan, what it would be like.
And last segment, I couldn't even go on air.
So I went ahead and aired some clips because this is like when I've had family members come to me and say, I love you a lot.
I really appreciate you.
And I've got terminal cancer.
And they say I'll be dead in six months.
It's happened a couple times.
And they smile at you and they tell you they love you.
And then you're at their funeral and they're dead.
And that's what this is.
I'm here telling you that I'm going to die.
You're going to die.
We're all going to die.
It's not like your grandma's sitting there having a cup of coffee across the table from you, telling her that she's always going to love you and always going to be there, but that she's going to die.
But life goes on through children and grandchildren, doesn't it?
Not least of which, because this is more like your grandma coming to you for every six months for the past 20 years saying, I'm going to be dead in six months.
And then also conspicuously this time when it seems a little bit more severe than sometimes in the past, it coincides with her having a huge lawsuit that she's going to lose.
And my other grandmother's saying, I want to go home to my family and God.
I'm going to stop eating.
At 92, I'm ready to die.
And you say, I understand.
I respect your decision.
But you know, they had a long life.
They live on through you.
And as long as you live on and your children live on and their children live on and we're good people, their life meant something.
And if they cut us off like this in this incredibly ancient journey of our species, it is a crime never before committed on this planet that is just so unspeakable that all our ancestors cry out.
And all of my will cries out and just begs all of you to realize there's a trillion distractions.
And they're all interesting and fun to cover.
And all this news is amazing.
But it's all part and parcel of the spiritual fall of man and the spiritual battle we're in.
And the fact that we're entering undoubtedly the end of days being initiated by the Antichrist forces making the way for their transhumanist God.
And so on my metaphysical knees, I beg you on my knees to realize that this is the truth.
See, it's interesting that Savannah Hernandez will come on Tucker's show and say they hate Alex because he tells the truth and they're worried about how he is honest about things.
Whereas Alex's own version of it is the devil as manifested by social media companies.
And there are a lot of very twisted, very old forces that hate us because of our success and what we've already done throughout the cosmos that are attempting to stop us here before this very important mission is launched.
Now that mission is taking place in the third heaven.
There are references to the third heaven in extra-biblical texts, but also one in 2 Corinthians in the Bible.
And the conventional understanding that usually is thrown around is that the first heaven is the sky, the second is space, and then the third is where the angels and God live.
Boo!
But it's pretty obscure terminology, so it's weird for Alex to be using it.
Also, great to hear that Alex is reporting to his audience that there's a war going on in heaven.
Even though he's been yelling at us all this time about how he's safe in God and everything's perfect, all of a sudden now I found out even when I die, I'm going to have to go fight another fucking war.
If we are faithful and have courage and believe in God, God is going to give you the discernment and the blueprint and the download to defeat this.
And that is the great solace we have.
But we must not hate God for being angry that we were being put through this because this is the experience of free will.
This is the gift of consciousness and eternity.
We must first, before we're given godlike power, face evil so that we know it and have physically, cellularly felt it so that we will not be part of it in the future.
As our mutual friend Tucker Carlson says, they don't act like people who have a lot of time.
They act like people who are frantic to cancel the Constitution and our freedoms because they are running out of time.
They know they're a minority.
They know that we are the majority.
They know people are waking up.
They know InfoWars and frankspeech.com and a handful of others, Real America's Voice, right-side broadcasting.
There's a very few patriotic outlets out there where the truth can still be heard, but the American people are waking up, and that's because of InfoWars.
And I want to tell the globalists, even if they can shut down OEN or you or I or anybody else, the public gets what's happened now and that there's a foreign globalist pro-CHI-COM force destroying us.
So even if they silence all of us, America's too far awake now.
No matter what they pull or what they do, I don't see them getting out of this.
People who voted for Joe Biden come up to me in public and say, what a mistake they made.
So there is a red tide coming, but it's important that people understand that the election of a Republican majority in the House and the Senate will change nothing whatsoever.
The key here is to have a subset of patriots in both houses.
It could be 10 to 15 stout men and women in the House, as many as three or four in the Senate, who can use their leverage to change the agenda and save the country.
I want you to stop because what you're saying is the key to everything.
The Republican establishment, the neocons are allied with the Democrat deep state, the permanent state, to shut down a populist movement that they fear that came through Trump, now the Santa's, and others.
And so the key here is realizing just getting Republicans elected is not a panacea.
It's having those hardcore groups to blow the whistle, to bully pulpit, and expose what happens to be that key swing vote.
And people who are still sending their money to the Republican National Committee or sending their money to the Republican Congressional Committee, the Senatorial Committee, please, folks, go to the Infor site, send that contribution here or send it to my legal defense funds.
Having some crazy people in there in order to be blocks that the mainline party needs in order to get things done is the best way to force your agenda through.
And I also think that, like, I can't, I can't put this more bluntly than the experience of listening to this show, if you believe him, has got to be bewildering and threatening.
I'm predicting a new pandemic of some kind that begins in September.
They will then use that pandemic as an excuse for lockdowns.
But more precisely, they will rush through legislation which will be signed that says all voting has to be by mail because it's too dangerous for folks to go to polling places.
It's too dangerous for them to actually show up on one day and vote.
It's got to be great to be someone on InfoWars because you can just improvise stuff and riff thoughts and call them predictions, and then there is no consequence when all of your predictions are shit.
And I think that there should be some kind of like detriment to, but I think that's the same thing with like so much of the Infowars stuff.
There should be a hundred albatrosses around Alex's neck for all the failed nonsense bullshit that he's carrying around with him and pretending he never said.
And the same thing I'm sure will likely be the case with Roger.
I think what you're getting at and what I'm getting at too is that like the reason that this is allowed to go on and they can get away with it is there's literally no accountability.
I'm not trying to sit up here and say I'm a revolutionary leader and I'm an important person.
The globalists see me as that and they see Donald Trump and Roger Stone and a few others as that.
So we are your champions.
You are our champions to keep us in the fight.
But when I tell you that this is big leagues and we're taking them on at point-blank range and we don't back down, that's why they run stories saying, oh, we're backing down.
We're coming into them because they know our power is that we haven't backed down.
So I'm asking you, and I want to thank all the people that made donations at InfoWarstore.com.
Right there at the top, it says be a sponsor, make a donation.
I want to thank you and salute you.
You are 1776 2.0.
I want to encourage everybody to get t-shirts, books, films.
My family members were mowed down by Russian tanks in Budapest in 1956.
But if you're Alex Jones or you're Tucker Carlson or you're Roger Stone and you tell the truth about what's really happening in Ukraine, that Zelensky is an actor, an actor with a multi-million dollar condominium in Miami Beach, by the way.
So this is a narrative that's based on a comedy sketch that Zelensky did back in his acting days that right-wing Putin stooge crowds have discovered, and they're pretending it's gay porn.
It's pretty telling that Alex is pushing this very stupid and false talking point, and it really illustrates how bad the information he passes on to his audience is.
So this is the second time that he's used false or misleading information to claim that someone's gay and being blackmailed.
Marie and Le Pen did much better than expected in French territories outside the borders of France, like Guadeloupe, Martinique, and Réunion.
In order to explain this, Barnes has decided to suggest that this is proof that Macron was able to steal the election in places inside France, but somehow wasn't able to affect the vote totals in these other territories.
Using the exact same information and evidence, why not play the opposite game and craft a conspiracy that Le Pen was able to steal a lot more votes in these territories because they were outside of the country's borders?
You could use the geographical distance to pretend that they must have shoddy ballot controls.
The point here is that this conspiracy hinges on nothing, and the alternative conspiracy makes as much sense.
Barnes is covering the story this way because Le Pen is an extreme right-wing figure who matches the model of a leader Barnes would want in the world.
So regardless of how dumb the excuse is, every failing of such a leader needs to be explained by them getting screwed by some vast conspiracy.
In reality, Le Pen and Macron both lost in the first round of voting in these overseas territories to the far left candidate, Jean-Luc Malachon, which helps inform the context of the later vote.
There's one element of this that reflects the far right mobilizing some votes, but probably a much larger part of it is people in these territories not liking how things are going for them under Macron and voting against him as opposed to voting for Le Pen.
It's a bit unpredicted, and political scientists who spoke to The Guardian were caught slightly off guard, but it also makes complete sense.
People in these territories have different immediate concerns than folks in mainland France, and it makes sense that you might see slightly different voting patterns based on those immediate differences.
Yeah, I mean, it's not like Macron or the last president or the president before that or the president before that has really done much to make their lives a lot better.
I tend to believe that the first hour was him externalizing and projecting his own situation on the audience.
The legal situation that he's in is unstoppable at this point.
And so the globalist doom is unstoppable at this point.
Once he had someone like Roger around and then Barnes, they could bounce off each other and some of that gloom lifted for him and he kind of forgot about his troubles and got excited riffing around about maybe some people are gay and black male.
The bottom line that I would say, and like regardless of what the explanation for any of this stuff is, the central thing is this is fucking irresponsible.