Today, Dan and Jordan banish present day Alex from the show and jump to the past. In this installment, Alex explains "twists and subtwists," reveals the roots of the New Age movement, and gives strong evidence he's a sovereign citizen. Citations
True, and it made, like, I was not high, because I don't usually partake that much in the weed, except for as a, like, I found some, uh, it helps with sleep a little bit.
I don't know what to believe, whether that's saving face about an actual medical condition that he has because he doesn't want...
The people to look at him as weak, or if it's a situation where the Connecticut case, the lawyers had already left, and now he knew he wasn't going to have this deposition he had to do, so now the facade can drop, and what have you.
But whatever the case, I felt a little bit like a mark, and that I had cared more than I should have.
The big news poll shows many Germans see U.S. behind September 11th.
And I've seen similar major polls out of France, where about 60% of the public believes the U.S. government carried out 9-1-1.
That's 80-plus million people in that country.
And 60-plus percent believe the government did it.
Well, no, the government did it.
It's an absolute fact.
68% of Germans believe that they're being lied to by the press.
unidentified
A full 30% or people below 30, a large percent of those below 30 believe the government did it as well, 19% of those below 30. What statistic is being reported here?
So, like, if you listen to enough of Alex's show, you'll notice that oftentimes concrete stories are reported in ways that leave you completely unaware of what's actually being reported.
And I think that's intentional.
But leaving that aside, that clip includes a really interesting little tidbit that I think deserves attention.
In 2003, Alex is perfectly comfortable saying definitively that it's proven fact that the government did 9-11.
In the present day, when he's asked about it, Alex hedges his position and tries to pretend that, you know, he just had some questions about the official story.
In the past, he'll say that he knows the name of the perpetrators like everybody in the organization.
But you flash forward to today, and he would never make that type of claim.
Or, like, put himself in a position where he's like, I will name names.
I've talked about this a little bit in the past, the idea of wet concrete.
How the immediate aftermath of an event is essentially wet concrete where you can make an impression in it very easily, but if you wait for the concrete to dry, it's really hard to get your narrative to make a dent.
You can't write your name in the sidewalk.
This is a very large part of why people like Alex really try to spam their theories hard and fast.
But there's a side aspect of this dynamic where, in order to make your immediate theories seem more convincing to people in those early times, you have to be completely emphatic in your certainty.
People are looking for answers, and you seem like a bad source of answers if you present your theories as possibilities that you can't prove.
You have to push them as if you have a rock-solid case, or else you run into the risk of your audience searching for someone else to give them the impression of that certainty that they need in order to comfort them.
As time goes on, this position needs to soften because, as is always the case with these kinds of conspiracy theories, eventually the foundation of your narratives just fall apart and it becomes too obvious that there was no basis for your certainty in the first place.
Like, it's no good to be certain ten years after the fact when everything looks stupid.
There's an unspoken agreement between the conspiracy theorist and their audience, where the theorist satisfies the emotional need for certainty that the audience is looking for, and the audience conveniently forgets later that the things that the theorist was certain about were bullshit.
it.
unidentified
Without this status quo, a show like Alex's could not exist.
If Alex didn't provide that certainty, his audience would find him weak.
If his audience held him to his past positions and demanded he explain how this certainty about things waned, Alex wouldn't be able to do the show that he does, and thus he'd be unable to provide the audience with that comfort and certainty that they need next
And thus, definitive positions will be taken that are quietly disowned later, and the audience will get ready to unquestioningly believe the next definitive position They don't!
There's some comfort you can take, despite the world being horrible, which you already knew it was, there's some comfort in knowing that this man has a grasp on it.
Well, not only that he has a grasp on it, but because of that grasp that he has, what he's describing is a world that is run by sort of A to B to C to D predictable events and everything.
At this point, France's population was closer to 61 million people, which seems like me being a little nitpicky, but, like, Alex is, like, 20 million people off.
Which is released in English under the title 911, The Big Lie.
Since its release, the book has been roundly and comically debunked, and its author, Thierry Messon, is not taken seriously by anybody who recognizes his name.
A May 2002 article in Time Europe claims that the book had spent six weeks at the top of the French bestseller list, which is no small feat.
That's fairly impressive for a book, and I think that's the basis for Alex's outrageous claim that it sold 30 million copies.
That number is fucking insane, and a June 2002 article, which is after It would have spent six weeks on the top of the charts.
Alex could say the real number, and it would be impressive if you know anything about, like, book sales or the French book market, but he's aware that his audience isn't going to be dazzled unless the number just jumps off the page.
In addition to that, it's really important for Alex to make the image appear to be that people who believe the things Infowars reports are the majority in the world.
I mean, I like the idea of calling that doing a little poll.
I did a little poll over the past, I don't know how long, for whatever length of time, to whatever number of people on several radio stations that may or may not exist.
I mean, I just hope the globalists realize that, that they can lie all day and put their spin out all day and they can blow more stuff up and kill more people, and we hope they don't, and tell us how they're saving us and telling us we need to love them.
They can put the gun to our head of terrorism and say, capitulate to tyranny, or it's over.
But I'm here to tell you, a lot of people are afraid to stand up in church and talk about it, and they're afraid to stand up in their classroom and talk about it, and they're afraid to talk about it in the grocery store.
But when I'm on 1,000-plus interviews, it's well over 1,000 now, multiple interviews a day in the last 23 months since September 11th.
And I did hundreds of interviews before that, probably 500, 600 in all the years before that, and things have just accelerated since then.
And think about that.
You talk about a poll.
They call a big poll 5,000 people or 1,002 people.
The difference between a good and bad poll is all down to methodology.
The number of participants is definitely one of the factors, but it's much more important that the variables are controlled correctly and you end up with a representative sampling of the population, which is something that Alex's dumb radio interview poll doesn't capture at all.
There's a selection bias, first of all, for who asks Alex to be on their shows, what types of shows are these, what types of audience is probably listening to a show that would have Alex on as a guest.
Interestingly though, there's one conclusion you absolutely can draw from Alex's telling of this story, and that is that 9-11 was the best thing that ever happened to him from a career perspective.
He went from not really that many people being interested in interviewing him to people banging down the doors to have him on.
And that's because he claimed a level of confidence and assuredness in the position he was putting forward, which made him interesting.
He wasn't saying that he questioned the mainstream narrative of 9-11.
He wasn't saying there were anomalies.
He wasn't saying that he had doubts.
Those positions would be boring.
He was saying loudly and into a bullhorn that it was definitively proven that Bush and his administration did 9-11 and the planes were remote controlled.
And when it's someone who has a clear, inherent set of chops like Alex has, this can lead to a little bit of a media windfall.
And that's exactly what happened.
People were confused and trying to make sense of a national tragedy that's ended up affecting the entire world, and Alex is there bombastically offering answers.
They're lies, but it hardly matters.
Now, the reason that I bring this up is because it's no longer profitable for Alex to be certain about 9-11.
It was in 2002 and 2003.
In fact, at that point, being uncertain probably would have been a detriment to Alex's brand.
And this is exactly what you see with him in the present day.
He's all but disowned pretty much all of the insane bullshit he was pushing back then.
You're never gonna hear him try to sell a loose change DVD on his show or talk about how the hijackers are still alive.
That stuff he pretends wasn't a part of making his career because that would actually be shameful for him to admit.
He never could prove any of that stuff, but because it got him more attention, Alex represented himself as someone who could prove it all.
He manipulated people in the aftermath of a huge tragedy for his own profit, and once it was no longer profitable to sell those lies, he moved on and pretended he'd never said that stuff to begin with, it began lying about another tragedy.
Alex's career is rooted in tragedy profiteering.
The most notable events in his career, the things that put him on a national stage, all of them were things where he was lying about something painful to someone else.
Oklahoma City, 9-11, Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, the Aurora Batman shooting.
All of these are events where Alex sold his completely made-up story in the immediate term, and then now doesn't want to be judged by what he sold.
By the way, Germany's technology minister, about 20 months ago, put out a report.
He didn't just make a statement.
And by the way, part of his report is in that George Humphrey audio book we offer on the shopping cart that you can get through to an Infowars.net and the 911.
It'll be easier for fire ants to build a rocket in your backyard and go to Mars than for all these things to happen that happen when you add them all together.
21. He was definitely spouting 9-11 conspiracy theories, but he wasn't saying it from the position of certainty that Alex is claiming.
Again, Alex's game relies on creating the fake impression of certainty, and in order for this story to really pop for him, he needs to project that certainty onto all of his sources, including Von Bulo.
It's not enough to just say that he gave an interview where he said that he found it unthinkable that the hijackers could have pulled off the attack without intelligence.
A major part of this, if you're Alex, is you need to cram certainty down your audience's throat.
You want them to think of themselves as questioning and skeptical, but in reality, the most dangerous proposition for you is the idea that they might actually start questioning things, like the things you're saying and...
So, just to be clear, I think Alex now would love for everyone to believe that all he did was say, like, I had questions and, you know, I think the government let 9-11 happen.
Let them keep licking their lips and reading out the teleprompters and all their neocon scams and lying liberal New World Order scams.
And you know what?
They're going to do even more horrible things to make us love them, to pose as our saviors.
But the genie's out of the bottle, Pandora's box is open, and the truth...
You can't kill it.
It isn't going to go away.
You just watch.
No matter how horrible the stuff is you pull, boys, no matter how bad it gets, more people are going to blame you because you are the enemy combatants.
You are the terrorists.
You are the usurpers.
You are the overthrowers of the republic.
You are the traitors and the seditious enemy.
Agents of the private corporation, the crime syndicate known as the New World Order.
As I was listening to that, I was thinking that it may be true that you can't kill the truth, but apparently what will do the trick in terms of killing something being presented as truth is for Alex to decide it's not profitable to pretend it's the truth anymore.
These globalists don't need to do anything nefarious to get Alex to stop covering something.
They just have to wait until his audience gets bored of it and he moves on to another subject.
They just need to wait until the theories he's presented as definitively proven are so embarrassingly debunked that he...
He needs to pretend he never believed that stuff to begin with.
I mean, I don't have specifics because I can't give you specifics in the places that I have specifics.
What?
They've been all over the news blowing the whistles.
What I'm saying is I can't give you the people I know personally deep inside government because they're sources, but I can tell you about Robert Wright at the National Press Club on C-SPAN.
Number one, we are engaging in revelation of the method and mass desensitization to an overall horror that the subconscious is already aware of, so we are being allowed to do this to introduce it.
So that there is not a mass insanity that then causes a break into open rebellion.
Now, that's on one level.
But, again, it's overheating their system, and there is a sub-twist in the twist, and it's blown up in their face.
I believe that what he's saying is that by telling people what the Illuminati is doing, and people not really being able to do anything to stop it, we are desensitizing them to the need to stop it.
I mean, that's an interesting thought, but no, that's not what he's saying.
He's saying that intuitively, on a subconscious level, everybody out in the world already knows in their bones and in their spirit what the Illuminati is doing.
So once the prestige happens and there's the revelation of what the globalists are up to, the Illuminati is up to...
Then there won't be open rebellion and, like, a civil war breaking out or whatever, because Alex has already revealed this to people, so it won't be such a cataclysmic...
Now, at another level, what happens is the New World Order wants to discredit America.
The New World Order wants to demonize America, and for some of the unsophisticated minds in the world, and the liberals, and some of the Europeans who are more sophisticated but are still not sophisticated enough, They hear and think that America, the red, white, and blue carried out 9-1-1,
thus America's bad, UN is good, then the UN comes out against the war, against the imperial moves, against the lies, and makes the UN look good, so in a judo move, they take the energy and allow 9-1-1 evidence to come out, they allow it to sit there simmering, destroying America's outlook and...
The view people have of America worldwide while empowering the more centralized arms of the New World Order.
So, the caller has an interesting quote to help Alex feel better.
Thomas Jefferson?
No.
So, if you recall, on our last 2003 episode, a Canadian called in and wanted to get into a fight with Alex about how he's a coward for not supporting the war.
Alex is still a little raw about this, I think, because this caller wants to make him feel better with a Teddy Roosevelt quote.
unidentified
Okay.
I guess yesterday you had that gentleman from Canada calling you a traitor and a coward, blah, blah, blah, because you weren't going along, you weren't a Bush worshiper supporter.
I found this really interesting comment by Theodore Roosevelt, where he said to announce that there must be no criticism of the president.
Or that we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.
Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, and the Constitution, that we are the government, and when the government becomes destructive of the republic, it is our right, our duty, not to overthrow the Constitution and the republic, but to restore it against the establishment.
That's an actual quote from an editorial that Teddy Roosevelt wrote in 1918.
The problem I have is that that is not an election year.
Woodrow Wilson won re-election in 1916, and Teddy Roosevelt had been out of office for about a decade at that point and one year away from death.
The context for this quote is actually really ironic, if you know where this comes from.
This caller is using it to defend Alex from that Canadian guy who said that Alex was a coward for not supporting the war in Iraq and supporting Bush.
Well...
In Roosevelt's case, he was writing this editorial about how it's great to question the government and the president because he was actually more in favor of war than Woodrow Wilson, and he'd gotten some flack for that.
In the previous two years, he'd been writing editorials about how the U.S. needed to get more involved in World War I, arguing that Wilson wasn't being strong enough.
The editorial that this quote comes from is his defense of himself on accusations of him being disloyal for calling for more war than the president was waging.
We all agree that it's fine to criticize the president.
It's just funny that Alex is lying about when this was written, and he takes this quote about justifying a desire for more war and turns it into something about, like, Roosevelt saying it was cool for people to overthrow a government if they just decide that it's full of usurpers.
I think that a part of it was an impulse to be like, he was selfless in saying this, and even when he was running for president, he said it's good to criticize the president.
There's so many fantasy layers to this belief, but if you really think about it, Alex kind of really does need to create this elaborate maze in order to defend his points against obvious rebuttals.
Yeah.
unidentified
For instance, you have to ask yourself why Alex is allowed to be on air and profit from yelling about how Bush did 9-11 and then just go home and live in peace when, according to his telling of it, the New World Order is a bloodthirsty cabal of murderers who will defend their banking cartel at all costs.
So now the globalists not only did 9-11, but they did it in an intentionally sloppy enough way so that the thinking people in the world would see the obvious clues they left behind and they would use these to argue that the U.S. did 9-11.
If Alex was right and the New World Order secretly wanted people to think that the U.S. did 9-11, wouldn't the people who said that the U.S. did 9-11 be promoted and pushed by the media and not completely marginalized?
You'd think that the globalists, who control all world media, wouldn't want 9-11 conspiracy theorists to be treated like completely unhinged idiots because their claims being accepted is actually an essential step in achieving the globalists' aims.
And yet, every news story from around the time about 9-11 conspiracies treats these people as completely wrong or as malicious liars.
Also, if the globalists really wanted to make people not like the United States, they could just have, like, a more realistic, frank discussion about U.S. foreign policy in our history.
That would probably tarnish people's impressions of our country real quick.
The first point was I wanted to point out how recently with Uday and Kuse with them being killed, it really shows what a sadist culture we live in when people are celebrating the deaths of these two men and they totally forget that we've already lost hundreds of our men and we're losing men every day.
It's all good and well to present a theory that the government's gonna fake some kind of evidence, but I think it doesn't really make for a compelling case when you just come up with, like...
You know, trying to come up with a real-life example and you just reference a movie?
You may notice that Alex does this all the time because he believes that movies are speaking cryptic messages to him.
The New World Order is taunting him and revealing their truths through the movies that he chooses to see.
So saying it's just like Running Man may as well be Alex providing actual instances of the New World Order doing the thing that he's claiming that they do all the time.
The Pentagon did release photos of Uday and Kuse's bodies, which a lot of people rightly thought was gross.
Alex and this caller are just pretending that they didn't also do dental exams and x-rays to confirm that these bodies were in fact Saddam's kids, because it sounds more fishy if it was just a picture.
There were plenty of pieces of evidence that these were Saddam's kids, but the Pentagon was also really set on making sure that people who were fighting against them in Iraq accepted that these were Saddam's kids because that would have a demoralizing effect.
I suspect that the clear intention that was evident that they wanted to prove that this was Uday and Kuse set off the distrust alarm in people like Alex and this caller.
This defiance thing, it doesn't even really matter, I don't think, what's being said.
Like, if...
Biden and the international community, I don't know how this would happen, but somehow if they sided with Russia, if they were like, Russia was right to invade Ukraine, Alex would be defending Ukraine.
Yeah, because, you know, I first got a tip on that about...
Several years back, when I drove past regularly one of these New Age bookstores, and no one was ever in it, and I said, how could they stay in business?
I have been trying to get a cable access show since 1998.
Now, such things as a black Christian group from a church that does a little singing and piano playing can walk in and get a cable access show and no trouble at all.
Or some idiot talking about an invisible dog fence can walk in and get a show.
And I have been trying to show Well, you need to go in and get their bylaws and their rules and file suit against them.
Depending on the state, you might be able to let that shit fly.
So, yeah, this is basically harass them with threats of litigation, and you'll get on air, and then you can play my stuff, and then, in doing so, you will destroy the station.
Then what happens is it drives down the overall wages, breaks down the society, and if the government wanted to enforce INS rules, they would go and fine and fee and arrest all these corporate leaders.
But that's not going to happen.
And folks, we used to have a couple hundred thousand immigrants a year.
Now it's millions legal, millions illegal every year.
And they're being filled by the Fortune 500 full of race politics, whether they're Russians or Chinese or Hispanics.
We always talk about Hispanics because they're the majority, the 400 million in Latin America, 20 million new births a year coming this way.
And, yeah, it's just felony crimes being committed everywhere, but the government is legitimizing it.
800-plus cities except fake IDEs from Poland, Mexico, Venezuela, the matriculars.
It's just wholesale destruction of the republic.
unidentified
Absolutely, Alex.
And you know what?
And the other thing I wanted to make a point is I have a relative who works for the state of Illinois, and she told me she heard that, you know, a lot of these gas stations and convenience stores and Dunkin' Donuts are all being bought up by Pakistani or Indians.
And they're supposedly tanked.
At least in the state of Illinois, she said she knows that they're tax-exempt for seven years.
Now, Alex, if there's any truth to it, then she said they milk the system, and what they'll do is they'll bring a brother.
So you may notice that this caller is just bringing up a feeling that he has that all fast food kitchens have a lot of Hispanic employees, which Alex then immediately pivots into a conversation about his fears about immigrants.
It's fascinating how Alex just hears...
This is what comes out.
This then spirals into Alex complaining about his perception that immigrant crime is completely out of control and that all these fake IDs are accepted for immigrants and this is destroying the country.
That's where his mind goes when someone brings up a feeling that a lot of fast food workers are Hispanic.
And that should tell you a lot about Alex and his racist ass brain.
Also, the idea that foreigners get tax exemption is a completely racist myth that circulated forever to demonize non-white business owners, but it's not true at all.
The irony here is that it actually has its roots in another reality of immigration that people like Alex and this caller pretend isn't real, namely that you're not eligible for most federal benefits from the government until five years after you immigrate.
Because the right-wing media need to portray immigrants as solely a strain on the system, this entire thing needs to be inverted.
In reality, most folks aren't eligible for benefits, and if they run a business, they have to pay taxes.
This gets reported by racist xenophobes like Alex as them getting rich on welfare immediately and being tax-exempt for seven years.
It's just bigot shit, and there's nothing real about this at all.
And again, at the end here, you see this payoff turn into the great replacement conspiracy theory.
The idea that the globalists are trying to bring in all these immigrants using incentives like welfare and tax exemption in order to bring in a population that will vote subserviently for things that will take the country away from the rightful whites like Alex.
In more recent times, with a lot of mass shootings and violence directed at immigrants and being inspired by people's anger at immigration, this great replacement conspiracy has gotten a lot of attention.
that was very clearly and regularly articulated on Alex's show going back at least a decade.
The people who are carrying out these shootings now could very easily evoke been raised with the kind of information space that Alex creates, where this fraudulent perception and perspective on immigration is just accepted as reality.
Yeah, I mean, you go back to Pat Buchanan, you go back to...
You can just keep going back and back and back because white people are terrified that they won't be able to run roughshod over the rest of the world for long.
And people have to start valuing alternative information and spreading the word about alternative information every way they can.
And I've talked to my IT guy, Dwayne Coutts, and he's never seen anything like it.
It is a massive attack.
Denial of service, you name it.
Multiple forms of attacks on the entire server farm and particular offshoot feeding Infowars.com and PrisonPlanet.com.
Because, you know, the site gets tens of millions of visitors a month now, literally.
And so, you know, sometimes at midnight or something, when it reloads or something, it'll go down for a few minutes and then we fix it.
It's still rare.
This one is huge and sustained, and it'll just make people go to the site more because they can't get to it, but Infowars.net is up, and we're putting the photos of Kwesi and the Saddam brothers' sons.
Before I take 20 calls on air about this subject, let me just cover it now.
Infowars.com and PrisonPlanet.com are rarely down, but as the traffic has grown, we've had to expand the size of servers and server farms, and every time we grow out of our britches, we have some problems.
But the current outage, I'm told, is because of some of the backbone of the Internet itself, where our servers are located.
There's a problem in that city.
And we've already gotten a bunch of calls at my office, and we've gotten calls at the network and a bunch of emails that people can't get to Infowars.com or PrisonPlanet.com, and I apologize.
Furiously trying to shut down alternative media sites and simultaneously using alternative media to disseminate information that they need disseminating.
Well, it's because by attacking it, it'll only make Alex more popular because they know that the globalists attacking him will make him look more legit.
This is sort of an interesting proto-version of Alex's marketing plan that he would use once he got kicked off all the social media stuff.
It's like, come find the verboten information, that kind of thing.
It's baked into the very DNA of his show.
People not wanting my shit around.
Right, right, right, right.
Any kind of setback that I can have, whether it is getting kicked off something or a tech problem, can be presented as proof that what I'm doing is fucking serious and dangerous.
In deals with the third world, we posted three or four times the last month.
People keep requesting it.
The official State Department document from 1991.
Detailing a declassified plan since 1974 with Kissinger and others, 73, excuse me, that if third world countries want money, IMF World Bank loans, they have to sign their people over as collateral and they have to sterilize forcibly half the women in those ten countries.
We don't just have the facts that were traded like cattle on the open market.
None of that's real at all, and Alex is rambling around making vague references to some document, but it's actually just the National Security Study Memorandum 200.
This was an analysis of population growth trends and their implications for national security.
It had nothing to do with signing over populations as collateral and the stuff about...
that sterilization is just Alex lying about suggestions in the document about providing funding for contraception in the developing world.
Really makes you wonder if Alex actually believes the Sovereign Citizen shit, or if this is just a desperate attempt to make sure the audience thinks he knows everything and is really interesting.
Because whatever the case, if you're a listener and you believe Alex, he's leading you down an insane and dangerous path.
These kinds of beliefs funnel directly into the world of sovereign citizen communities, and from there you have a much greater chance of taking in ideas about how your supposed rights might make you kill a cop who pulls you over for driving without a license.
And I remember old-timers, you know, eight years ago talking about the maritime and that's how it really ran in the courts.
And then now there have been cases like Diana Lupe, the famous screenwriter out in the New American magazine.
Big report was also in the Associated Press three years ago.
She owned 90-something acres in a beautiful three-story house on private land with public land around it.
The house was homesteaded to 1906.
And they went and closed.
Public roads that on the maps were not even part of the Forest Service and not cross Forest Service lands, but on three sides it was Forest Service lands.
They came to her house, grabbed her, wouldn't let her have her stuff, arrested her, said, you can't have a jury, we're taking your house.
No warrants, no judge.
And she went before the judge and he said, this is maritime.