#612: October 31, 2021 dissects Alex Jones’ election fraud claims—like Georgia’s pipe burst and ballot "consent decrees"—debunked as baseless, while exposing his misrepresentation of the Lincoln Project’s tiki-torch stunt as a Democratic false flag. Jones ties AT&T’s racial justice training to a "white people are the problem" narrative, ignoring context like Chicago Tribune op-eds, and pivots to Tucker Carlson’s Fox Nation series, framing it as a "plot against America" akin to Nazi propaganda. His shifting alliances—from China/Russia as villains to allies—undermine credibility, yet his "globalist depopulation" conspiracy persists, blending racism with unproven theories. The episode reveals how fringe narratives exploit outrage cycles, normalizing violence under the guise of truth. [Automatically generated summary]
Yeah, this concert was really, really great, but it also helped me remember that I'm not just an old crank.
Like, I like analog music.
You know, like, I'm not like that.
It's better with a live band.
You know, their live show touring is the two of them, the producer and the incredibly talented singer.
And it's great.
Their music is really good, but when you've got a couple of drummers, when you've got guitarists, when you've got real musical instruments, it's just better.
Again, thank you for joining us on this Sunday October 31st broadcast.
Wow, the incredible amounts of news here.
First off, Democratic Party operatives got caught again like they did in Charlottesville four years ago, leading the Attempt to stir up racial conflict so that they can try to derail an election and make sure that a Democrat gets into power and replaces the other Democrat, the monster Governor Northam that's leaving.
Caught red-handed right during the national firestorm of basically every newspaper and every so-called news TV program attacking Tucker Carlson and by extension,
yours truly for daring to say that January 6th had feds and NGOs, by the way, provocateuring a small minority of the million people that were there for a peaceful demonstration to break into the Capitol.
Alex has never and will never present any compelling evidence that either the Unite the Right rally in 2017 or the storming of the Capitol on January 6th were provocateur or somehow run by shadowy forces in the government or some unnamed NGO like the Red Cross.
The standard that's required to claim that something is proven is so low on this show that he can just get away with saying whatever he wants.
Oh, it's proven.
Anyway, as for the current situation, it has to do with a dirty trick type stunt that the Lincoln Project pulled on Virginia gubernatorial candidate Glenn Youngkin.
They had five people dress up in khakis and hold tiki torches near Junkin's bus during a photo op and voice support for the GOP candidate.
There's a number of angles to this whole thing, but I want to just say up front, so it's totally clear that I'm entirely opposed to what the Lincoln Project did.
The first and most important reason is that a kind of stunt like this strikes me as a bit disrespectful to the folks in the community and the activists who are at the Unite the Right rally.
At very least, it seems like a co-opting in a very crass way of their experience and trauma and using that as a prop for a political rally.
Second, this just isn't an effective strategy, and it's tailor-made to backfire.
The intent was allegedly to create a spectacle that would highlight Jungkin's bigotry and shittiness, but that was never going to be the outcome.
And it's kind of hard for me to believe that the Lincoln Project, a group of Republican strategists who made their brand just not liking Trump, wouldn't know that the right-wing media as it exists would completely tear this apart and immediately shift the conversation to being about how this stunt proves that the left is just creating fake white supremacists to be mad at and make you scared of, and how January 6th was really the Democrats' fault when you get right down to it.
I cannot in good faith believe that the specific people who run the Lincoln Project would be so naive as to not know that this is the result that would happen and that their actions actively hurt the cause that they're pretending to support.
As for what Alex is saying, all of this is completely detached from reality.
The Lincoln Project is not the left, as Alex claims.
The Lincoln Project sucks, and it's not aligned with the left, nor is it even as left-leaning as the Democratic Party.
They're essentially a bunch of Republicans who read the room and they realized they didn't want to be on Trump's side and decided to work an anti-Trump but pro-conservative grift targeted at Democrats desperate to find some Republicans who weren't evil.
A May 2020 report from Open Secrets pointed out the following, quote, the Lincoln Project reported spending nearly $1.4 million through March.
Almost all of that money went to the group's board members and firms run by them.
The Super PAC spent nearly $1 million with Summit Strategic Communications, a firm run by Lincoln Project Treasurer Reed Galen.
Another $215,000 went to the Tusk Digital, a company run by Lincoln Project advisor Ron Steslow.
Both companies received little business from other federal committees since Trump's inauguration.
A February 2021 piece on the Huffington Post reports that over $50 million of the $90 million the Lincoln Project had raised had, quote, gone to firms controlled by the group's leaders.
I have a strong suspicion that these folks are just running a scam, and if you needed to be further persuaded of this, I would submit to you the response that their co-founder Steve Schmidt gave when asked about their financial sketchiness.
Quote, we fully comply with the law.
The Lincoln Project will be delighted to open its books for audit immediately after the Trump campaign and all its affiliated super PACs do so, explaining the cash flow of nearly $700 million that flowed through their organizations controlled by Brad Parscal and Jared Kushner.
I don't know if I could come up with a response that makes you look more guilty than that, but that one wasn't that good.
And one of the primary things that sparks suspicion about their business model at the Lincoln Project isn't just that the money seems to flow to Lincoln Project folks' other companies.
The real kicker is that they spend a suspiciously high percentage of their budget on producing their ads.
As that article in Open Secrets points out, they spent $19,000 on an ad against Martha McSally, but only one quarter of that amount was spent on ad placement, quote, with the rest spent on production costs.
These are, of course, production costs that are paid to companies that are run by the people in charge of the Lincoln Project.
That three quarters of the budget going to production costs is juxtaposed with that of the pro-Trump super PAC America First action, which had production costs at about 2%, quote, with the rest of their budget going to ad buying.
The Lincoln Project are not anyone's friend but their own.
And to drive that point home, think about the fact that if George W. Bush was president right now, their organization wouldn't exist.
They don't really care about the things they want you to think they care about.
They just want you to think that they do so they can fundraise.
Also, they had to cut ties with one of their co-founders, John Weaver, after multiple allegations of him, quote, sexually harassing young men looking to break into politics came to the surface.
To their credit, they did put out a statement denouncing Weaver in January 2021.
To the opposite of their credit, they knew about the, quote, at least 10 specific allegations of harassment since June 2020 and chose to ignore it until the outlet the American Conservative began reporting on the allegations.
Anyway, this stupid stunt that they tried to pull at the Youngkin event is exactly what you would expect from them.
It's flashy, it seems like it's making a point, but it actually isn't, and it's red meat for the right-wing media.
The important thing to understand about this is that regardless of the motivation for their actions, what the Lincoln Project did is counterproductive and they should just stop.
No, I mean, ultimately, the Lincoln Project exists to create a group of people more than willing to lean into whatever right-wing narrative is already being created about the left and thus justify it, giving them more power.
And because the Lincoln Project is theoretically separate from the Conservative Party, you can have the Lincoln Project do exactly what the right needs the lefter media to do that they're not doing.
I wouldn't go as far as what you're suggesting, kind of.
And I know that you don't mean this literally, but that kind of does end up like getting into coordination, like ideas of coordination.
Right.
It's just they're smart enough to know a spot where they can make a little bit of, they can get a piece of the attention economy and use it to fundraise and make a lot of money.
I just mean like when there is a spot for the left media that the right wants to hate, the right will always go to that left media as well because they hate it so much in the same way that they are afraid of their own media, so they constantly go back to that.
So there's a grift to be made there.
They make it, and it just so happens to dovedale perfectly with what they already want.
I don't think that I mean, this is pathetic because Alex, I don't think he is dealing with reality that Tucker Carlson would throw him under the bus in a second if it helped his ratings.
They got all the major corporations from ATT to Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan to you name it saying white people are inherently bad because of the color of their skin.
I have right here, and I got copies of it, the critical race theory training put out by the CEO, signed by him.
This is a story about race-related training that had been leaked to a journalist who then made claims about the material without actually, you know, he wasn't actually citing stuff from the material.
And then those claims are the things that have been repeated by figures in the right-wing media, presented as being from the actual documents, as opposed to a writer's interpretation of them.
For their part, AT ⁇ T released a statement saying that the reporting on this is, quote, filled with misinformation and inaccuracies.
And I'm going to applaud this journalist in question for actually releasing the documents in question here so I can take a look at them and see for myself.
One of the problems that jumps out to me immediately when I see these documents is that it clearly what amounts to a printout of an interactive web platform, basically, or program.
There's like a huge selection of links and different sections, which obviously will take you to other pages that serve as resources to inform the point of the exercise that's being undergone here.
One of the big things that's constantly parroted about this document is that it teaches the employees that if white people want to know who is responsible for racism, they should look in the mirror.
That formulation is in a ton of articles covering this attempt at a scandal.
And here's what that comes from.
It's in a section of links, and it goes to an op-ed in the Chicago Tribune titled, quote, white America, if you want to know who's responsible for racism, look in the mirror.
Yes, those words do appear in this document, but the context is pretty intentionally ignored by the people trying to drum up outrage about this.
The op-ed was written by Delene Glanton, and for the most part, it makes a fair point.
From the article, quote, racism is no different from any other chronic problem.
It occurs as long as it goes unchecked.
Black people, for the most part, are powerless to stop racism.
If we could, we would have done it a long time ago.
In many ways, this op-ed shares some common themes with Martin Luther King Jr.'s letter from a Birmingham jail, particularly the part about being gravely disappointed with the white moderate.
Glanton's op-ed is essentially an articulation of a challenge for people who are not racist to recognize that their inaction effectively aids racism continuing.
And that the change needed to get where we want to go starts within your own mind.
It isn't saying that white people are evil or bad.
It's just, you know, that's the interpretation you might expect a racist to have.
Racism, by definition, is quote, prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.
Black people cannot exude a sense of superiority that we have never experienced.
I guess if you want to get mad about that quote, you can do that, but it would be good if you were mad at the actual context instead of a fake version of what this person's saying.
And then Gil Scott Heron says, That's a cold-ass honky.
So the journalist who published this sensational article about the document is a guy named Christopher Ruffo.
And that might not be a name that's familiar to most people, but it probably should be.
He's essentially the entire reason that the right wing is up in arms about critical race theory.
Rufo has leaked some documents from an anti-racism seminar put together by the City of Seattle's Office of Civil Rights.
And after he reported on it as a scandal, he began to get other such slideshows sent to him.
According to a profile of him in the New Yorker, quote, Rufo noticed that they tended to cite a small set of popular anti-racism books by authors such as Ibrahim X. Kendi and Robin D'Angelo.
Ruffo read the footnotes of these books and found that they pointed to academic scholarship from the 1990s by a group of legal scholars who referred to their work as critical race theory, in particular Kimberly Crenshaw and Derek Bell.
Rufo followed that thread and decided that the entire idea of anti-racism is actually kind of a Marxist plot, which I hate to break it to him.
That's exactly what the John Birch Society was saying in the 1960s when they were opposing the civil rights movement.
Benjamin Wallace Wells, the author of this piece in The New Yorker, corresponded with Rufo, and this is how Rufo explained his path: quote, We've needed new language on these issues.
Political correctness is a dated term, and more importantly, doesn't apply anymore.
It's not that elites are enforcing a set of manners and cultural limits.
They're seeking to re-engineer the foundation of human psychology and social institutions through the new politics of race.
It's much more invasive than mere correctness, which is a mechanism of social control, but it's not the heart of what's happening.
The other frames are wrong, too.
Cancel culture is a vacuous term that doesn't translate into a political program.
Woke is a good epithet, but it's too broad, too terminal, too easily brushed aside.
Last September, Rufo appeared on Tucker Carlson's show and put the term critical race theory onto the right-wing media's map, and from there it's become the new way for conservatives to express racism while maintaining an appearance of social acceptability.
I also hate to inform conservatives that they are just repeating themselves again.
And for an illustration, I'd like to present to you a passage from a 1981 interview with Republican strategist and Roger Stone buddy Lee Atwater.
Coding racism in abstract and marketable ways is kind of a standard operation for conservatives, so it's not surprising to see Rufo found a new term to use to play that old game and he thinks he's a genius.
Anyway, Trump saw him on Twitter, got him to come to DC, and he helped Trump draft an executive order.
So that New Yorker article about Rufo also has a bit from Kimberly Crenshaw, the law professor who coined the term critical race theory years ago.
I think her take on this is pretty much exactly correct.
Quote, reform itself creates its own backlash, which reconstitutes the problem in the first place, Crenshaw said, noting that she'd made this argument in her first law review article in 1988.
George Floyd's murder had led to, quote, so many corporations and opinion-shaping institutions making statements about structural racism, creating a new broader anti-racism, racist alignment, or at least the potential for one.
Quote, this is a post-George Floyd backlash, Crenshaw said.
The reason why we're having this conversation is that the line of scrimmage has moved.
As she saw it, the campaign against critical race theory presented a familiar effort to shift the point of the argument so that rather than being about structural racism, post-George Floyd politics were about the seminars that had proliferated to address structural racism.
I think that about sums it up.
Anyway, the guy who got mad about corporate seminars and stumbled into a shiny new buzzword for racists to use to hide behind has found a new corporate seminar to be mad about.
And hopefully he's going to get some airtime on Tucker and his career in this shitty scam could continue.
I always kind of get excited when that happens because I know Alex is just going to find words to hinge his responses on and be like, talk over any part that might involve context that could disagree with him.
The problem that the system and the establishment has with Tucker is that he's emblematic of the fact that the GOP is waking up to the new world order.
It's really funny watching the Democrats right now because it does feel like they're mad that lying to their electorate about doing something and then not doing it doesn't work as well as the right wing.
It feels like they're like, this should work.
They do it all the time.
They lie to you nonstop.
They didn't do any of the shit that you said that you wanted them to do.
And it doesn't actually involve the same sort of bloodthirstiness and anger that the right wing does, which are the appealing parts of it for a lot of the folks who get tricked by it over and over and over and over again.
Trump-hating Virginia elections director says Tuesday's results may have to, quote, wait until Friday or maybe longer because of mail-in votes.
And again, this isn't like absentee voters where you sign it, it's certified you've already voted.
This is a large portion of the state saying, oh, no, we don't want to go vote because of COVID, a same replay we've seen across the nation.
And so they've got stockpiles of all these extra ballots out there that then wait in reserve in warehouses until the middle of the night or until the next middle of the night, a few days later, and then in pull the vans, and then they stick the ballots that are all for the Democrat candidate into the machine.
Remember, we saw the footage of that in Georgia.
We saw the footage of that in Michigan.
We saw the footage of that in Pennsylvania.
We saw the record of that happening in Arizona.
All the places that Trump won by two, three, four, five, or even up to 10 times the numbers he won in 2016.
And all the top-round states, that night when they said we're not counting anymore at one or two or three in the morning, depending on the state, Trump had won by one point, two points, three points, four points, five points.
Most of those states, he barely won by a fraction of a point.
And suddenly he was winning by two, three, four points.
You know, my four-year-old daughter got some candy from her grandmother for Halloween.
And we put it away and I told her, stop eating.
You've had too much.
You're going to make yourself sick last night.
And I saw her kind of walk over behind the couch, and she was kind of acting suspicious when she ducked down.
And I went over there and she had a Tootsie roll.
And it was bedtime.
She couldn't have it.
I mean, she's okay, looking, goes over, hides behind the couch.
I mean, this is more obvious.
In Georgia, they look both ways, look around, they say a water bane's broke, they kick everybody out, they put stuff up over the windows, and then they go and flip up the tablecloth and pull out the briefcases and look around.
They start shooting it through there.
And we have to sit here and watch this and put up with this type of crap while these people steal the election in front of us.
So a bit of what Alex is talking about, like in there with the Georgia video, that's a bit of fiction that the right-wing media put together to serve as a dead to rights proof that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump, but it's bullshit.
In Georgia, there was a pipe that burst at the State Farm Arena where absentee ballots were being processed at approximately 6 a.m. on November 3rd.
There's also a video that made the rounds of what appears to be people pulling ballots out from under a table at the State Farm Arena vote counting area.
That video was from about 10.15 the night prior and had nothing to do with the pipe burst.
Some anonymous weirdo called the Hip Hop Patriot decided to combine the two into a compelling story, put it out on Twitter, and from there it became Alex's reality.
And that's why the whole election was a fraud right there.
The 2020 election is a fraud and has to be redone.
Don't hold your breath just under the law because of that fraud right there.
But it's already been certified by Congress.
And that's why Mike Lindell's right about it all being a fraud and Supreme Court should overturn it.
But they don't have the political will.
We need to stop worrying about reinstating Trump.
Don't hold your breath.
And we need to start working on stopping the current fraud in the special elections and the midterms in 12 months and the general election coming up in three years.
So, you know, this kind of discordant thing is in poker another thing that you call a tell.
That all that stuff about how we're going to die in six months, that's just kind of an extreme sensational bullshit thing to keep the audience's attention, keep their emotions heightened, keep them scared in order to funnel their attention towards the political projects that you hope to push in the midterms and in 2024.
That's essentially the grift here that Alex is engaging in.
And the deep stage terror attacks run the gamut from actually blowing up a federal building and then blaming it on their Patsy McVay in 1995, and that was open and shut.
You research it.
A staged event by the very same crew in power today.
He was one of the operatives heavily involved at the time.
And then you fast forward to things like Charlottesville, where you just get a bunch of Democratic operatives to dress up with tiki torches and to go out.
And then you have a leftist mob shows up actually believing that they're there to fight Nazis.
And then there's a huge explosion of violence and you can blame Trump.
This is stupid and obviously not true, but man, it's so weird how Alex has somehow proven that all of the high-profile acts of violence by bigots in history are real.
And you would think that the party and the people pushing horrific racism as a matter of course would also probably be the ones at fault for the terrorist violence they claim and then are proud of.
Friday, there were people with Tiki torches lining up at the Republicans' bus saying they were there officially with the Republican candidate because he's ahead in the polls and they're panicking.
They don't know if they've got enough warehouses, the Democrats do, full of ballots that they can bring in in the dead of night this time to stop this landslide.
They don't know.
And so they just show up with their tiki torches, and the media, NBC, all of them ran with, oh, the white supremacists, they're there supporting them.
I think that people just assume that she got an abortion because of the association with that case, but I don't remember ever learning that or the media implying that.
And then only after it came out, did then the Lincoln Project come to the rescue, and the Lincoln Project went on CNN.
And CNN said, here's the Republicans taking credit for what they did.
Republican strategist, the Lincoln Project.
That's like saying that Bill Clinton is a Republican or that Thomas was a Republican or Jimmy Carter was a Republican.
That's how dumb they think you are.
So once the Democrats were getting the blame for the false flag they were involved in, the racial false flag, well, here comes as fast as they could, almost falling over themselves as a Lincoln Project and say, oh, no, that's us.
But also, Alex laughed in the middle there because he knew he'd fucked up in his list, but it was too late to do anything about it.
Not only could you say that Thomas Jefferson was a Republican, you could say that he literally founded the Democratic Republican Party, also known as the Jeffersonian Republican Party.
Sure.
That isn't the Republican Party that we know today, but none of the parties resemble themselves from even 100 years ago.
This is how Alex is trying to rationalize why he's being sued for defaming Brennan Gilmore in the Unite the Right rally suit that is going to trial fairly soon.
So, the people who portrayed the fake white nationalists in the Lincoln Project stunt very well may have been Democrats, but even if you prove that they're involved in politics and swing to the left, that still doesn't prove that they were engaged in this stunt under any official auspices of the Democratic Party.
If you think about it for a second, who else are you going to get to pose as white nationalists at a GOP rally other than Democrats?
Probably highly motivated young ones.
You know, I think that's the pool of people you might be able to get to be, hey, it's a political stunt.
We're going to, you know, don't forget, it would also have to be somebody who's like, wait a second, you want me to go to a place where horrific violence happened and traumatize a bunch of people just by dressing like an idiot?
ATT says racial re-education program, that's a close quote, asserts, quote, white people are the problem.
That's a quote.
Radical re-education program.
White people are the problem.
That's a quote.
You ought to go to the article on Infowars.com by Paul Joseph Watson.
You ought to link through to the whole document that got put out.
And it's the CEO of it, John Stanky, S-T-A-N-K-E-Y, Stanky.
And he just says the whole world's problems aren't Chinese slave camps or aren't toxic waste dumping or aren't the forced inoculations killing some of the people, the economy locking down.
I don't think that what you'd come away with from reading these or looking at these documents is that they're arguing that it's the only problem or even the biggest problem in the world.
So the deep state globalist Democratic Party has been caught in a racial false flag with their operatives posing as white supremacist and saying they support the Republican Party.
That's just a standard thing they do continually, and they do not want you discussing it.
They want you to believe Jesse Smollett really got attacked.
They want you to believe that there's all these racial attacks around the country that in almost every case turn out to be fake.
Yeah, and when you say responsibility, that is true.
I would also say that if you expect people who have worked within the Republican Party strategy and planning and media situations for most of their lives, it would be hopelessly naive to think that they didn't already understand that.
With his big report coming out, three-part series on the plot against America, where the federal government openly is branding the American people in official policy.
I told you they were announcing that you were terrorists right when Biden snuck his way in.
They had press conferences saying anybody questioning elections is a terrorist.
Anybody questioning open borders is a terrorist.
And then now they say to go to the school board and say, we don't appreciate you teaching that white people are inherently bad, which is total Nazi crap.
I mean, saying a group is bad because of what race they are is Nazi stuff.
I mean, it's an original sin to be from a certain group.
That is pure Nazi stuff.
And it's all in the official U.S. government stratagem of the National Security Council put out by Joe Biden in June.
So Alex is actually selling himself incredibly short here by saying that he called this when Joe Biden got into office.
Alex has been claiming that the homeland security apparatus is about to be turned against white people for basically his entire career.
This is one of these instances where illustrating that Alex said this shit 15, 20 years ago really doesn't make him sound like a psychic.
Makes him sound like a broken record or a boy who's crying wolf in a really racist way.
It doesn't help his case that January 6th was a plot to turn counterterrorism against white people if you point out that he said the exact same thing about almost every other terrorist act you can think of.
Turning the power of the state against white people is why Alex claims they framed Timothy McVeigh for the Oklahoma City bombing.
It's why Alex spent so much time pretending that the FBI was going to frame a white Patsy for the Boston bombing.
If you go back to 9-11, that's even part of his conspiracy there.
Passing things like the Patriot Act only happened because the state wanted to make you afraid of foreign terrorists, but it was really about giving the state more power so they could eventually use it against white people or patriots, as Alex prefers to say that.
This is a preoccupation for Alex because he's a racist.
He's been beating the stupid drum for his entire career, and this is going to go on the mantle what he's doing right now.
It's just another time that he insisted the sky was falling.
And, you know, we just don't really have the perspective of hindsight because it's happening in the present.
No, I think it will because that's a really important context to the whole thing.
You know, if you realize that the people leading the rally are themselves saying fuck BLM and burning flags, you know, and Alex just talked about something, you know, like when you when you think that.
And they are freaked out because Alex and Tucker, when they talk about these sorts of issues and they bring light to the globalist false flags, it hurts their ability to pull future false flags.
And you know that they've got the system scared because they are so freaked out when Carlson raises this, or I raise this, because it's the elephant in the room.
And what is the elephant in the room?
Just as sure as the sun came up this morning, the deep state is going to stage terror attacks in the next year before the midterms, just like they did Oklahoma City in 95 to make sure Clinton would be re-elected.
And the Democratic Party and Bill Clinton said he owed his reelection when he was 20 points behind to the Oklahoma City bombing.
Look it up.
Bill Clinton said he owed his 1996 re-election to Oklahoma City.
Type that in, click web, do a web search, do an image search.
So I don't think Clinton said exactly that, but if Alex wants to provide a specific citation, I'll look into it.
I suspect that this is just Alex putting a dramatic spin on the idea that Clinton saved his re-election with his response to the Oklahoma City bombing.
As the story goes, his numbers were terrible, and it wasn't looking good for him getting a second term.
Then the Murray building is attacked, and he shows up and gives an amazing speech that comforts Oklahoma and the nation in this horrific moment and encourages a path forward.
Many folks have said that that speech and Clinton's leadership after the bombing played a major role in his reelection.
And if Bill himself ever expressed feeling that way, I don't think that would be too surprising.
It doesn't prove that he did the bombing in order to get re-elected, though.
It's still this giant leap that Alex wants us to make, and it's fucking dumb.
Even with all this being said, if you look at Gallup's approval ratings for Bill Clinton, you'll see that he was hovering around the mid-40% approval prior to the bombing.
46% the week before.
Then 51% for the next two weeks.
By June 5th, it was back down to 47% and around there consistently.
It didn't go back up into the 50s steadily until November.
And I just think that this is a little bit of mythologizing based on how good that speech was after and how that did really cement him as a strong leader.
Yeah, and I think that more to the point about this stuff, too, like the system's not freaked out because you're going to blow some kind of false flag they're planning.
It's because this is going to get people hurt.
This inevitably leads people down a path that leads to violence.
He's there to fuck with people's emotions, use information as a weapon, whether it's accurate or not, and incite them to action that he will then later call a false flag.
I've told you this for 20-plus years because the first five, six years I didn't understand my calling.
I just know I was being pushed by God to do this.
But about 20 years ago, it was just like a voice in my head almost.
It was so strong and dreams.
And you are going to lay the path.
You're going to be like the archetype.
I'm not comparing myself to a prophet, but to like a John the Baptist in the wilderness.
And I never compared myself to that because 20 years ago, there was big party strategy documents came out and they said, Jones is the John the Baptist of the Tea Party, and he's the main engine our computer studies.
And our analysis has shown he's got to be stopped.
And yeah, I think that it's kind of fucked up to think that there's any reality to Alex's, even his own subjective perception of 20 years ago he had a vision and prophetic dreams that he was supposed to lay the groundwork for this holy battle.
This fight against the New World Lord and the fight against the great reset, as bad as America is, and as fallen as America is, and as corrupt and out of control as we are sometimes, we're still the best help this planet's got.
So that's why I thank you all for your support and keeping us on air because we're an incredibly historic time to be alive right now.
I'm saying if our political movement is to defeat the satanic New World Order and the rest of it, is I've been the mad prophet out in the wilderness.
And that basically now is the spin they've engaged in.
Because that's how they see it as well.
Because that's really archetypally what it is.
Okay, we're going to go to break.
I'm going to come back with a Jim Acosta desperation.
When you hear him talking, it's Jeff Zucker.
It's AT ⁇ T.
It's the desperate, evil globalist corporations that thought they had America defeated, but are just now realizing that they have awakened the sleeping giant.
That is coming up.
And separately, I want to thank all the listeners and viewers for your support.
You're getting great products at the same time.
We need a major war chest to do a lot of new projects we're launching.
And we've got Black Friday comes early that we launch for the first two weeks of every November.
So I bet he would be up in arms about somebody who would throw away basic human decency like that and simply claim, based upon appearance, someone looks like a demon.
Republican Congressman Denver Riggleman, who is working for the January 6th Committee, has said at least seven white nationalist groups were involved in the rioting.
Forget Universal Pre-K, some of these guys at the Capitol wanting Universal KKK.
I mean, that's so, of course, there were seven white supremacist groups that came there working with the Southern Poverty Law Center, ADL, and the Democratic Party to do that.
So this is kind of how you know Alex is riffing this and kind of freestyling is because he was like, oh, yeah, he's mad at the Confederate flag.
That's all he's got.
And then immediately there's a point about how the January 6th committee has shown that there were at least seven white supremacist groups or white nationalist groups.
And in order to be like, uh-oh, that's exactly counter to what I was saying.
The other thing, too, though, is that Alex is doing this weird soft talk ramble about how great Tucker is and his family and all this.
Alex will be like, how do I know?
Because he told me.
I think that anytime Alex reports on something based on something somebody else has told him, you should know that he's an idiot and he's gullible as hell.
Another thing that keeps happening is that whenever Alex breaks his own rule and does these coverage things where he pops up in it, he gets kind of bored once they get past the part where his name comes up.
Incidentally, someone did plant two bombs at the RNC and DNC headquarters the night before January 6th.
So, you know, if you don't see people with bombs or bayonets in the videos at the Capitol, you know, you might want to look at the surveillance videos that the FBI has released because there you'll see some bombs.
Also, I do appreciate that they are absolutely tourists, and the police stood aside because they were tired of fighting.
You know how when you go on vacation and you want to go to a big monument or something like that, and you're like, I'm just a tourist, and then you fight the cops into submission in order to see it.
Yeah, because you can't pay the fee or whatever.
And what if it's closed?
You got to beat up enough cops to where they quit because you're a tourist.
Yeah, I mean, whenever you don't have a government willing to do anything to correct a violent overthrow of the government, they're going to make up stories and then try it again.
Is it a false flag or was it just people that were tourists?
Well, the people that got roped in outside and waved in, they are innocent.
Guys that pooped on Pelosi's desk or drank her beer.
Okay, you gave Democrats charges dropped for burning down federal buildings.
I don't think that's right.
But if you let them go for burning down federal buildings, you got to let somebody go for pooping on Pelosi's desk, especially when he's been in solitary confinement for eight months.
I think that sentence served, don't you?
I don't think he'll be crapping on Pelosi's desk anytime soon.
What happened is that a ton of people who stormed the Capitol pissed and shit wherever they wanted and left a huge mess behind.
In addition to that, a guy named Derek Jancart, who was part of the storming of the building, claimed that in his defense, he never considered shitting on Nancy Pelosi's desk, although people were chanting for someone to do so.
So Alex's claim that Trump tried to request troops but was blocked is actually the exact opposite of the truth.
From a breakdown in the Military Times, you can get a sense of the very precise timeline of this.
On December 31st, 2020, D.C. Mayor Mariel Bowser extended a request and an invitation to the National Guard to come help support local police in the district.
Several hundred troops did respond and they were posted in DC, but they couldn't work with the Capitol Police.
Specifically, they were not allowed to work on federal property without approval from the Capitol Police, who are outside the jurisdiction of Mayor Bowser.
That's something that, like, my partner stops over there.
My partner and I watched all of Kitchen Nightmares and 24 Hours to Hell.
I'm back, the Gordon Ramsey show, where he goes and he finds small businesses that are struggling and they're about to fall apart, and he tries to help them out.
You know, love that shit.
I love it when a business gets helped.
And it's very funny to me that they can make a lesson out of it.
So one of the things that I think is really troubling in the recent past was that clip from a turning point USA meeting event where someone asked Charlie Kirk.
They want to have a physical one, which is totally true.
Bravo.
Kudos to Kirk for getting it.
But I would have continued, which Kirk didn't, explaining, hey, have you seen the Democrats on MSNBC saying we got to take out the mother-effing white people and that we've got to kill Trump and we got to kill all these people?
They're the ones a thousand times more than us calling for violence.
So I would have, in response to a question of when is it time to start shooting people, I would have thrown in a bunch more stuff to fuck with people's emotions and make them scared and feel like they're in danger.
So maybe they'd be more likely to use guns while at the same time I say, ah, it's a trick that they want to trick you into being offensively violent, but also anything you do violent is defensive because they're the ones who are super violent.
See, Charlie, what you're misunderstanding about answering that question is that the time was, I guess, when Timothy McVay bombed the okay homeless city.
We should have been using guns from the beginning, but you can't tell people that.
When I say anti-communist, I don't mean someone who's opposed to communism.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I mean anti-communist as sort of a tradition that has tendrils all over the place.
Right.
Conspiratorial mindset, definitely that links up with all kinds of historical frameworks, be it blood libel, be it the protocols of the elders of Zion, all these sorts of conceptions about the new world order, the Illuminati, all this, which uses opposition to communism as a mask, essentially.
And the actual work that they do is against social welfare programs, against rights for people in minorities.
I wasn't criticizing your use of communists, of course.
But yeah, that is just such a great, brilliant, and accepted way for them to get away with saying we're white supremacists and everybody just being like, well, they come from an anti-communist tradition of just like, yeah, they come from we should blacklist the Jews tradition.
They come from what black people shouldn't be allowed to drink from the same water fountains tradition.
I would like those documents because I've heard a lot of different things about the relative position of Bill Gates over the course of my time listening to Alex.
So anyway, yeah, I told you this is not like the best Alex show, but there are things in there that merit discussion, and there's deeply racist undertones throughout a good part of it.