Today, Dan and Jordan check in on the deteriorating situation on The Alex Jones Show. In this installment, Alex makes up a giant story about a video one of his interns found on C-SPAN, interviews a mega-creep, and announces that he's going to have to sell his tank. Citations
Right, but when you're doing these things, and, like, I know that you don't know who they are necessarily, but, like, Nick Gage and Jon Moxley are huge names in this sort of arena.
After you mentioned this on our last episode, my buddy Berger, who I used to go to the Isle of Capri Casino with, messaged me and it reminded me of some things.
And we were talking about it.
It's like, yeah, the casino's really depressing, but what's worse is the dog track.
Project Veritas got Pfizer executives on video admitting that they know that the vaccine is destroying people's immune system, that it's a higher rate of people that are sick that are taking the vaccine, and that it's causing ADE, antibody-dependent enhancement.
This, of course, is a false choice that's being presented, where one option is getting vaccinated and the other is surviving COVID.
This conveniently ignores a whole lot of variables, like the possibility of dying or having severe complications from getting COVID.
These things aren't factored in because the video is arguing a stupid fake point.
There's no evidence in this video that Pfizer knows that vaccines are causing ADE, nor that they're wiping out immune systems.
There's one secretly recorded interview with a guy who's credited as a, quote, senior associate scientist who says that the rise in cases we're seeing with the Delta variant is possibly attributable to a decreased efficacy of the vaccine over time or the immunity waning.
This is being misrepresented by Alex to be this guy saying that over time the vaccine destroys your immune system when in reality it's just him explaining that the protection you may have went from 95% to 70% effective.
This is a person having a loose conversation, not someone who's citing hard information, so I don't know how much I would bank on even the specifics of this.
Let's go ahead and nationalize production and distribution of the necessary medical breakthroughs that happen, so the messy suspicion about profit motives, it just goes away.
Ladies and gentlemen, you saw, you heard the broadcast title today of the Alex Jones Show.
October 5th, Tuesday.
Emergency Tuesday broadcast.
Fauci talks about staging health scare with new virus in 2019 video.
Now, our amazing crew ended up staying up here until past 8 o 'clock last night.
To bring you an emergency Monday transmission.
And believe me, I didn't just come up here for fun.
This is an emergency.
So is today's broadcast.
Because this confirms they've premeditatedly done this to us.
And Fauci on the video with the head of Health and Human Services saying we need a new virus out of China, an avian bird flu, a SARS-CoV-2 bird flu, to scare everyone into accepting the new mRNA technology.
This is just a pathetic attempt on Alex's part to grasp its straws to build up and reinforce his COVID conspiracy.
Even before I get into any of the details on this, just take a moment to grasp how stupid Alex is and what nonsense he expects this audience to accept.
Here he is saying that Fauci and other immunology experts got together and discussed how they needed a new SARS COVID bird flu in order to get people to accept vaccines.
Does Alex know that coronaviruses and influenza viruses are completely different?
In October 2019, Fauci was part of a panel hosted by the Milken Institute, which was broadcast on C-SPAN.
This panel was a discussion about the breakthroughs in science and technology that had made it conceivably possible to create a vaccine that actually worked universally against all strains of influenza.
Most of the discussion is about the frustrating reality that there's a lack of funding and thus a lack of motivation on the part of the industry to pursue this sort of thing, which makes sense and sucks.
There's literally no discussion of staging a pandemic.
And we're going to actually take quite a while talking about this, because I think that there's a valuable illustration that we can make by going to the source material and comparing it to the way that Alex presents it.
I mean, obviously we can't just turn off the spigot on the system we have and then say, hey, everyone in the world should get this new vaccine we haven't given to anyone yet.
But there must be some way that we grow vaccines mostly in eggs the way we did in 1947.
In order to make the transition from getting out of the tried and true...
Egg growing, which we know gives us results that can be, you know, beneficial.
I mean, we've done well with that.
To something that has to be much better.
You have to prove that this works.
And then you've got to go through all of the clinical trials, phase ones, phase twos, phase three, and then show that this particular product is going to be good over a period of years.
There might be a need or even an urgent call for an entity of excitement out there that's completely disruptive, that's not beholden to bureaucratic strings and processes.
So we really do have a problem of how the world perceives influenza, and it's going to be very difficult to change that unless you do it from within and say...
I don't care what your perception is, we're going to address the problem in a disruptive way and in an iterative way, because you do need both.
But it is not too crazy to think that an outbreak of a novel avian virus could occur in China somewhere.
We could get the RNA sequence from that, beam it to a number of regional centers, if not local, if not even in your home at some point, and print those vaccines on a patch and self-administer.
So we're going to go through this each clip by each clip that Alex put into this compilation and discuss the context, where they come from, and what they're talking about.
Because I did watch this panel, and I thought it was actually really interesting.
So here's the first clip that Alex plays.
unidentified
Why don't we blow the system up?
I mean, obviously we can't just turn off the spigot on the system we have and then say, hey, everyone in the world should get this new vaccine we haven't given to anyone yet.
But there must be some way that we grow vaccines mostly in eggs the way we did in 1947.
So this is the moderator of the discussion, Michael Spector of The New Yorker.
His question was very clearly about technological innovations in the sphere of vaccines.
It was a prompt that had to do with how this is not a space that has kept pace with other fields.
Here is that clip in its full sentence.
unidentified
So as part of my life, I teach at Stanford and people use this word in Silicon Valley, which I mostly hate, but I'm going to use it now, disruption.
Why don't we blow the system up?
I mean, obviously we can't just turn off the spigot on the system we have and then say, hey, everyone in the world should get this new vaccine we haven't given to anyone yet.
But there must be some way that we grow vaccines mostly in eggs the way we did in 1947.
We live in a world where I can download whatever song I want onto my phone at command, and we grow vaccines the way we did 70 years ago.
In order to make the transition from getting out of the tried and true egg growing, which we know gives us results that can be, you know, beneficial.
I mean, we've done well with that.
To something that has to be much better.
You have to prove that this works.
And then you've got to go through all of the clinical trials, phase 1s, phase 2s, phase 3, and then show that this particular product is going to be good over a period of years.
That alone, if it works perfectly, is going to take a decade.
Like, I don't think it's really all that misrepresentative.
Fauci was talking about how there were breakthroughs that scientists were making in terms of a universal flu vaccine, but it would be something that would still take a long time.
There might be a need or even an urgent call for an entity of excitement out there that's completely disruptive, that's not beholden to bureaucratic strings and processes.
I mean, I guess what he's trying to say is that the government is acting too slow.
Or I guess what Alex is trying to make you think he's saying is that because the government can't act the way that we want it to right now, then there needs to be an outside entity that is not beholden to all of those laws of the evil government that keeps them from doing stuff.
I mean, it probably hasn't been for quite some time.
I mean, when I was in grad school, everyone was working HIV vaccines.
I was in the laboratory here at Robinson and working on DNA vaccines for HIV.
And I came to the lab and everyone's working HIV.
She said, you can do what everyone else is doing.
I've got a little bit of leftover flu money on a flu grant over there, and no one's interested in influenza.
So I took on that challenge.
To make it sexy, I think we have to...
I like the concept disrupting this field.
If we are just continually thinking we're going to work on another iteration or...
No offense, I think we need to continue what we're doing, but another iteration or another assay or another step, I don't know if that's enough to excite those really creative thinkers.
So in addition to doing what we're doing we're so good at, I think in parallel there might be a need or even an urgent call Well, the HIV field was galvanized when we put a lot of money into it.
So we really do have a problem of how the world perceives influenza, and it's going to be very difficult to change that unless you do it from within and say, I don't care what your perception is, we're going to address the problem in a disruptive way and in an iterative way, because you do need both.
Whether you're young or whether it's intermediate.
Whereas with influenza, for some people, they go throughout life, it doesn't impact them at all.
There isn't anybody that's afraid of influenza.
You go in a focus group and you say, are you afraid of getting HIV if you're at risk?
Oh, absolutely.
Are you afraid of getting cancer?
Absolutely.
Are you afraid of the flu?
Don't bother me.
I mean, that's the reality of how people perceive flu.
As Rick said, we're responsible.
For a variety of diseases making countermeasures, malaria, tuberculosis, Zika, Ebola, in the middle of Ebola right now.
So you go to the DRC where I went to a week and a half ago to visit our sites.
And you ask somebody, are you worried about influenza?
They'll laugh at you.
What are you talking about influenza?
They don't vaccinate their people for influenza because they have enough problems with malaria and tuberculosis and now Ebola.
So it is a perception, which is a misperception, that it is not a serious disease.
But as Casey said...
Hundreds of thousands of people die of it each year, and when you get a pandemic, millions and millions of people.
So we really do have a problem of how the world perceives influenza, and it's going to be very difficult to change that unless you do it from within and say, I don't care what your perception is, we're going to address the problem in a disruptive way.
And in an iterative way, because you do need both.
So essentially, if you take the entire context of the clip into consideration, what he's saying is that there's not going to be public pressure ever really to deal with the flu.
The influenza vaccine that would possibly be something that could be created isn't going to come from people who are like, I'm terrified of getting the flu.
But it is not too crazy to think that an outbreak of a novel avian virus could occur in China somewhere.
We could get the RNA sequence from that, beam it to a number of regional centers, if not local, if not even in your home at some point, and print those vaccines.
Craig Venter, who is a controversial person but interesting to me, has written that he thinks we ought to have a vaccine such that if you take off in a plane from Hong Kong and are infected...
By the time your plane lands in New York, there ought to be a vaccine assembled and deliverable to you.
How crazy is that?
How far away from that are we ever going to get there?
I'm not going to say how far away, but I don't think that's too crazy.
I think that if we move towards the era of synthetic-based vaccines, I think we remove the dependencies of thinking the vaccine has to be something that we have to grow.
If we can grow into something else, an egg or an insect cell, any type of dependency on growth, if we can move into more synthetic, the nucleic acid-based, messenger RNA-based, those sequences can be rapidly shared.
around the world.
Enzymes that can synthesize the small fragments of messenger RNA necessary to go into vaccine can be made in a shoebox size system right now, which is translatable into a 3D printer-like or inkjet printer-like thing.
Now putting those In a system to print those on a patch that a self-administered vaccine could happen.
The technologies are out there.
We haven't demonstrated their true effectiveness and ability for a vaccine.
But it is not too crazy to think that an outbreak of a novel avian virus could occur in China somewhere.
We could get the RNA sequence from that, beam it to a number of regional centers.
If not local, if not even in your home at some point, and print those vaccines on a patch and self-administer.
We're a ways out, but the technology is there to be adapted, assembled, to put in that futuristic view of a rapid response to an emerging novel threat.
So one of the things that I think is really fascinating is that I watched this whole...
This whole panel.
And there's stuff that was very intentionally ignored.
There's one comment that's incredibly bizarre that they left out considering that they cut out clips from before and after this in the panel discussion.
I mean, we're in this room, we're probably vaccinologists, we're probably immunologists, we're probably working on some vaccine, made some vaccine at some point in our life, but we're not the chemical engineers or the other engineers or the anthropologists or others who bring critical insight on how you disrupt and deconstruct an age-old problem.
I mean, we've had these vaccines for 70 years, so this is an age-old construct that requires those creative chefs to come out of the kitchen and deconstruct the carrot cake and make it look like...
It's like something different but the best carrot cake you've ever eaten in your entire life.
We need that for an influenza vaccine.
And we also need to not forget that for influenza, vaccines aren't the only part of the solution.
I mean, it's so easy to get caught up.
If you want to get sexy and influenza, you do stay in the vaccine space.
But if you go into the diagnostic space or the therapeutic space or non-pharmaceutical intervention, those are the early steps that will make a huge impact on bending that epidemic curve for seasonal and a pandemic outbreak.
And so we have to have that single focus on stopping influenza, not only on making a vaccine.
Yeah, it's almost like they're public health professionals and experts who are discussing ways of treating a problem and dealing with a problem as opposed to what Alex is presenting it as, which is they want to just put jabs in everybody.
You know that, like, the creative chef who can come in and turn an amazing carrot cake into something that you don't think is a carrot cake and you can eat deliciously without being like, carrot cake is shit.
Peter Daszak and the Wuhan lab and Fauci and in the thousands of emails now saying gain of function, merge four viruses, then add the HIV spike protein, which is the COVID-19 virus.
It is just unbelievably open and shut that they did this.
It does seem, though, that if that is the smoking gun of smoking guns, then we can at least be sure he's only going to talk about that narrative from here on out, because that's the one.
So the message that Alex is trying to send is that the mRNA vaccines are a weapon and they're being deployed against the countries that he sees as Christian and white.
That's the subtext here.
It's very clear.
This is all just his own white persecution complex talking, though, since countries all over the world have authorized the use of both the Pfizer and Moderna shots.
When you get right down to it, it's really just about money.
Very few countries have the ability to actually manufacture mRNA vaccines and the companies that do aren't sharing that shit because it would cut into their profits.
The lower-income countries can't afford to buy large amounts of these vaccines for their population, so they may go with less effective but more affordable alternatives, or maybe just not able to vaccinate a vast majority of the public.
Anyway, this is just a load of bullshit, and the only real message Alex is trying to spread here is that white people are under attack, because that's the theme of this show.
I'm about to cover the depopulation-ish and the admissions, the facts, the public statements of Fauci, the arrogance of these criminals.
Hiding in plain view.
Because remember, art imitates life.
So why in so many movies with villains or sci-fi films or dystopic films does the villain brag about what they do?
Because that happens in history.
They love to monologue about what they're planning very thinly veiled in front of you before they do it.
Just like the Riddler or the Joker will break in on TV or radio and tell you he's sending you a treat that'll come knocking in the night in the form of...
So that it makes it more fun, like the Zodiac Killer.
Yeah, it's also really convenient because it gives the writer a way to create a situation where the hero is dead to rights and the villain is all but one, but because of hubris, the hero is able to wiggle out of the situation.
In Batman Forever, the Riddler actually worked for Bruce Wayne until Bruce Wayne neglected him or he had an accident or something, and then Riddles everywhere.
Anyway, this is just a ton of shit, but Alex thinks he's living in a spy movie, so it should come as no surprise that he imagines his pretend villains are taunting him like a Bond villain.
1815, at the Battle of Waterloo, Lord Wellington defeated in his British-Prussian pincer attack.
Napoleon Bonaparte and he sent carrier pigeons to the coast on fast Corvette ships across to announce that morning that Lord Wellington had lost the war.
And the British stock market plunged by 99%.
Rothschild, of course, began selling right up front.
Everybody panicked and began selling.
Then they came in with the news, oh my god, Wellington has lost, British army destroyed, British empire has collapsed, Napoleon rules the earth, and as soon as everybody started selling, he bought it all up.
And now, 200 plus years later, that system rules the entire planet.
So we talked about this in depth in the Endgame coverage, but just as a brief refresher, that story that Alex is telling about Nathan Rothschild is not true.
It has its roots in a pamphlet that was distributed by a giant anti-Semite whose pen name was Satan, but it was actually named Georges Derenvale.
The pamphlet, released in French, was titled The Edifying and Curious History of Rothschild I, King of the Jews.
Sure.
would be dramatized in the 1940 Nazi propaganda film The Rothschild's Shares in Waterloo.
To put it bluntly, Alex either thinks this fake story is true or he knows it's a lie that's been historically used to incite public hatred And he's passing it along to his audience as the truth anyway.
Yeah.
unidentified
I would say whichever is true, Alex is a horrible source of information.
Yeah, it's troubling that Alex, in the year 2021, is still peddling this story, because it's been thoroughly debunked, and there's every reason for him to know that this is an anti-Semitic falsehood that has lingered over the years.
And it's something that he perpetuates.
It's a large part of his worldview, and congratulations to people like Joe Rogan, helping spread that message far and wide.
And I really want to thank the listeners and viewers for your support because we're under such incredible attack.
And I've got a lot of plans and projects in motion working with other folks, partnering with other folks to be able to circumnavigate all the deplatforming and during key junctures be able to pop up and engage the globalists with the truth into this future time we're going, which we're now entered the beginning of.
So I need major wartime capital to do this, and that's why you're going to see me on air soon, just because there are little side issues, but they're important.
Selling the armored truck.
It's been great.
Had a lot of great coverage with it.
Got a lot of attention with it for our causes, but it's going to be sold.
I'm going to sell most of my guns that I don't need.
I've got too many that are extra.
50 cal, stuff like that.
Everything is going to go in to the full energy of the fight, because that's a ritual for me.
That I need to sell my house, which is being sold right now, finally, and everything into this, of course I'd want to put all in on the total future of humanity and my children and your children in front of God.
I mean, I could spill some blood on there, but that's not that kind of ritual.
But it kind of feels like it should be, doesn't it?
Because there will be blood spilled.
And so, at the end of the day, which we're not looking for, but the enemy's going to bring us into that.
Don't just get great products you need because they make your life better.
Fund this war and make sure as we go into this fight, as I walk into that arena with my shield and my sword and I got my helmet on, that we're all together on this because you're that gladiator on the field as well and that we are prepared and trained and well-fed and focused and not distracted to make sure we go in there in the Tom Brady zone.
Critical thinking is the DNA of freedom demanding we the people.
The experiment in self-government that is unique in the history of humankind here in the United States of America.
The Founding Fathers critically fought against the king.
The founding fathers critically thought against the arbitrary, punitive, and capricious and demonic rules that the king forced upon its subjects.
So they wrote down what they knew instinctively to be free, to be right, the gift of individual rights from God.
That's called the Constitution, the Bill of Rights.
Well, right now, if you're a critical thinker, if you're a good American, if you critically think, the entrepreneurs, the people in the arena, in the swirling dust of battle, the entrepreneurs that take risks and make sacrifices to start a new business and to employ people, the economic engine of the greatest quality of life in the history of the world, those critical thinkers are being punished and ostracized.
If you're a critical thinker and you're suspicious of the government, which you have to be, if you're honest, you have to be suspicious of everything about this government right now more than ever.
And if you are a critical thinker, you can't shop, you can't go to work, you can't go to school.
If you turn down the most offensive, forced medicine in the history of the world where the government says, "You have to take this shot or you can't go to the movies, you can't eat, you can't have a job, you can't go to school, you can't travel, you can't live." We're not forcing it upon you, but you can't have a life without it.
unidentified
Those critical thinkers are being punished and ostracized while we are importing desperate people from around the world.
We are witnessing the orchestration of an invasion of America by the government of the United States of America.
Make that perfectly clear.
The government, the entire gang of Democrat Marxists infesting our government are orchestrating the invasion of America through our southern border because those people will blindly obey the Democrats.
They have their Project Solace run by the big AI system.
It found that the majority of deaths and hospitalizations were from the vaccinated and that it's destroying their immune system and creating a syndrome called ADE that over time kills about 80% of people that develop it, Ted.
I mean, this is from the Pentagon's own Project Solace.
Well, number one, we, the people, salute you, Alex, Joe, because you got a team.
The Shining Coast.
And you're what the Founding Fathers wanted all Americans to be.
Suspicious of all authority.
And you don't do it being spirited, but you look into it.
And before the government can hide their own findings, you expose the findings that support everything you and I believe in and talk about and destroys what they call misinformation because the guaranteed misinformation on planet Earth...
It's all good and well to be suspicious, but that's not what Alex and Ted are.
This isn't suspicion.
This is coming to a predetermined conclusion and then being combative about anything that doesn't align with that conclusion.
It just so happens that the conclusion that they've arrived at is that the government is evil, so it's easy to paint anyone who doesn't agree with them as blind sheep, but that's just a trick.
That's just a sleight of hand trick.
When someone The appropriate next step is to search for corroborating or disqualifying information.
So you can evaluate that suspicion.
For instance, when I heard Alex covering that C-SPAN clip from Fauci...
I had a suspicion that he wasn't telling the truth about it, so the only way to deal with that productively was to find the raw video and assess it for myself.
Ultimately, it turned out that my suspicion was merited and that Alex was lying his ass off.
It would have been probably fine for me to just hear him talking about this clip and say I'm sure he's lying, but without learning more, I would be being lazy about reaching that conclusion and it wouldn't be based on it.
anything.
unidentified
This show would be really stupid if we just played clips of Alex and said nope without getting into the details of the stories.
There may be some positive effects that a patient could get from the steroid, but in terms of being a cure, which is his claim, there isn't evidence to support that.
There's not a lot to say about this dude.
He's just using the same kind of game that everyone in Alex's world does.
Patients that get better with his steroids are remembered, and the ones that don't conveniently get forgotten.
So the claim of a miracle cure can keep being made, and everyone's trying to cover up the budesonide and whatever.
I had a suspicion about this, so I decided to look into it.
So this is a stat that was from a study that was put out in April 2020.
So it really only captured the beginning of the pandemic response.
They found that in their data set of patients, 1,151 of them needed to be put on mechanical ventilators.
They only knew the medical outcomes of 320 of these patients, and of these, 88% had died.
That number does sound really high, but there's a couple important points that you need to remember.
The first is that if you're needing to go on a daily basis, you're going to be able to do that.
And you may have a higher likelihood of dying regardless of ventilation.
Yeah, that's how it works.
Yeah, that's how it works.
since they don't have a final outcome yet, which is to say they hadn't died or been discharged from the hospital.
These 831 people were still in the hospital, and depending how their cases went, the number could be a lot different.
If they'd included these people in the calculation, then at that point, only approximately 25% of the people put on ventilators with COVID had died, which is a big difference.
Other data sets from around this time, from places like Vanderbilt and Emory University, showed death rates that are right in that ballpark of 25 to 30. The point here is that Alex should get into some critical thinking.
Budesonite is mentioned in the NIH's COVID treatment guidelines in the section titled, quote, immunomodulators under evaluation for the treatment of COVID-19.
It's something that they think merits evaluation, which is a little different than Bartlett's silver bullet claim.
Budesonide is mentioned 39 times in the entire 365-page document, like in this passage from page 217.
Quote, there is insufficient evidence for the panel to recommend either for or against the use of inhaled budesonide for the treatment of COVID-19.
Most of the other times it comes up is in the context of the guidelines discussing studies that looked at budesonide's effectiveness in treating COVID and how the studies were inconclusive and further research was required.
The fact that the drug is mentioned in the guidelines means nothing, but it's the sort of thing that a con man might say if he wanted to make the audience think that even the NIH admits that this is a silver bullet, which is the game that's being played by Dr. Bartlett here on Alex's show.
I think something that they'd never consider about the way they view science, right, is if science actually worked the way that they think it does, we would get a new miracle cure for everything.
Every few months.
Every scientist would constantly be like, I saw it fix one patient, we got the miracle cure!
There was a tour of military bases put out by the Department of Defense and the American Forces Entertainment.
Apparently, Derek Richards was set to perform on this tour, but then a naval officer found some of his old tweets and sent them to the DOD and AFE.
From an article in the Daily Dot, quote, This is just sad.
While I would be opposed to the DOD and the AFE saying that Richards cannot tweet these things, since that would be, you know, an infringement of free speech kind of thing, I also don't think that they're required to employ him as a comedian if he joked online about killing the president.
I bet it never occurred to him that the DOD would be uncomfortable with that, because in his mind, Trump is the president, and they still work for Trump.
The idea of him going on a USO tour doesn't make any sense to me because they all work for the guy that you want killed.
Do you realize that it changed hands?
You know what I'm saying?
The DOD would be mad about you tweeting out a...
If a Biden supporter...
If I was a comic and I was booked to do a USO tour three years ago and I was tweeting out all the things that I was tweeting out three years ago, the DOD would have understandably been like, This is not a good idea.
And let's be totally clear, there is a bit of a difference in messaging between, like, I don't like Joe Biden and this meme implying that Mike Lindell would make a better country by killing Joe Biden with a pillow.
I don't think it's as outrageous to imagine that the USO would cancel his appearance on this tour because of this and other tweets that they found objectionable.
Because I do not like conciliatory tone where you think you may be going to get booked on something again, and so you don't want to say, hey, fuck the DOD.
All kidding aside, obviously we all know about your credentials and breadth of experience.
For example, seriously, just recently, in an episode of Celebrity Apprentice at the steakhouse, the men's cooking team did not impress the judges from Omaha Steaks.
And there was a lot of blame to go around, but you, Mr. Trump, recognized that the real problem was a lack of leadership, and so ultimately you didn't blame Little John or Meatloaf.
You fired Gary Busey.
And these are the kind of decisions that would keep me up at night.
Yeah, and the reason that Trump would even come up is because he was trying to say that Obama had a fake birth certificate, and he did this whole racist attack against him.
Now, if I were Trump...
And I had led this whole charge on the fake birth certificate Obama shouldn't be president thing.
I would simply not show up to the dinner where Obama's speaking.
It's fair to say that people like Debra Messing, they amplified the calling out of Derek's tweets, but they didn't search it out and try and find it just to destroy this guy.
A naval officer named Travis Akers found the tweets because he's stationed in the Middle East.
He'd heard about the upcoming tour, and he decided to see who the performers coming over were because he loves stand-up.
He found Derek's Twitter, and as he told the Daily Dot, quote, It's fun to pretend that this is just like all fake Hollywood liberal elites being on the warpath, but the reason that this is even being discussed is because this enlisted person was offended by what he saw on Derek's Twitter, and he tagged the DOD in a tweet about it.
In order for Alex's outraged machine to run properly, though, that has to be ignored entirely.
It's mostly because I don't really care about him tweeting this.
We can do that all day and it's just a dumb, not funny joke.
It does make sense that you'd get kicked off a USO tour for making that kind of joke, though.
You're entitled to your free speech, but you're not entitled to be paid to go on a USO tour.
Also, Kathy Griffin is probably the last example Alex should be bringing up, because she lost so many jobs after that picture came out.
She was fired from CNN, where she'd been one of the hosts of the New Year's Eve show, she got dropped from gigs, and she claims that she wasn't even allowed to fly for two months.
The picture also apparently got Kathy Griffin on the kill list of Caesar Sayoc, the MAGA bomber.
I wonder why he would put a target on someone who's relatively obscure and, you know, just released an admittedly possibly distasteful picture.
I don't know if this had anything to do with it, but allow me to take you back, Jordan, in my time machine to May 31st, 2017, where we can hear Alex's thoughts and Mike Cernovich's thoughts about Kathy Griffin.
CNN's who we're targeting, because she works for CNN.
She doesn't just do the ball drop.
She's routinely on CNN.
She does comedy for them.
I see her on there all the time.
I don't even watch much CNN.
She's a CNN worker.
She's a CNN employee.
And to fund this, we're going to sell a t-shirt.
You also get $1,000 or $2,500.
If you're seen wearing the t-shirt on national TV, C-SPAN, your local news, if that then gets picked up nationally or goes viral, I will choose $1,000 or $2,500 until it hits $200,000.
Alex and Mike Cernovich were so up in arms about the Kathy Griffin picture that they started a campaign to get people to buy shirts that said CNN is ISIS.
And then they paid people to yell that on live TV.
The argument, according to these idiots, was that Griffin was signaling to ISIS and if CNN didn't fire her, that means they also support ISIS.
So I guess the message Alex wants to give us about free speech is that when a comedian does something that's politically distasteful, it's a travesty when that person is fired if they're on the right wing.
However, if they're left wing, you need to offer $200,000 to wage a public pressure campaign to label them as an ISIS sympathizer to get their employee to employer to fire them, lest they be labeled ISIS supporters as well.
This is a coherent ideology and totally not Alex just pretending to.
to have principles because he's a dumb piece of shit.
When we're fighting this corrupt, murderous system for all of our futures collectively.
So I got a bunch of new breaking news I want to hit.
And I want to just say this right now.
I salute and I commend and I thank all of our affiliates, the great crew that puts up with me, both the production crew and the rest of the crew here at InfoWars, because I'm an intense person, especially these days, and I want to thank my family, and I want to thank God, of course, most importantly, for a hedge of protection if God deems that that needs to be done.
I mean, it's so shocking to me that he wouldn't recognize how transparent his tone is when it's like, I need to really over-dramatize what is going to end up in a plug.
If you're not a radio listener, or you are a radio listener, and you're a TV viewer, you're very lucky that you're a radio listener and did not have to look at her, because she is as disgusting as she can be.