#603: October 3-4, 2021
Today, Dan and Jordan check in on the present day of The Alex Jones Show. In this installment, Alex needs money, multiple power-point presentations get discussed, and Alex really, really needs money right now. Citations
Oct. 8, 2021 - Knowledge Fight
02:03:11
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
I'm sick of them posing as if they're the good guys, saying we are the bad guys. | |
| Knowledge fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Dan and George. | |
| Knowledge fight. | ||
| Need money. | ||
| Andy in Kansas. | ||
| Andy in Kansas. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Stop it. | |
| Andy in Kansas. | ||
| Andy in Kansas. | ||
| It's time to pray. | ||
| Andy in Kansas. | ||
| You're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I love you. | |
| Hey, everybody. | ||
| Welcome back to Knowledge Fight. | ||
| I'm Dan. | ||
| I'm Jordan. | ||
| We're a couple dudes like to sit around, worship at the altar of Selene, and talk a little bit about Alex Jones. | ||
| Oh, indeed we are, Dan. | ||
| Jordan. | ||
| I have a quick question for you. | ||
| What's up? | ||
| What's your bright spot today? | ||
| My bright spot today. | ||
| My bright spot today, Jordan. | ||
| Yes, Dan. | ||
| Is, I mean, look. | ||
| It's going to be couched in sort of a negative... | ||
| Right. | ||
| But it is a bright spot. | ||
| It is all the positive feedback from the last episode. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| On Monday's episode, there was just a flood of people saying such positive things about the episode. | ||
| And that is really nice, although it is very hard for me to deal with having the brain that I have. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, yeah. | |
| It's dastardly. | ||
| It's as if I'm being given terrible feedback if I were a normal person. | ||
| Right, right, right. | ||
| That's how my body experiences it. | ||
| But it's kind of immersion therapy, you know, to compliment and positive. | ||
| And I appreciate that, because I've got to get better at it. | ||
| Yeah, well, I mean, you're a bit like a balloon. | ||
| You can handle a certain amount of puffing up, but go too far and that sucker's going to pop, man. | ||
| And that was a flood of positive stuff. | ||
| But I'm also like a balloon that can only handle a tiny bit. | ||
| Yeah, you're a very small balloon. | ||
| I was trying to be really nice and not say you were a tiny balloon. | ||
| I'm a balloon that functions best when it's about... | ||
| Empty. | ||
| Yes, yeah, yeah. | ||
| You are the one remaining Luftballon, if you will. | ||
| But I'm, you know, it's something that I've been trying to get better at, like accepting positive stuff. | ||
| And, you know, I definitely appreciate it. | ||
| I was happy with the episode. | ||
| Yeah, it was fantastic. | ||
| So yeah, thank you everyone for all the kind words. | ||
| Yes, thank you to everyone for that. | ||
| What about you? | ||
| Me? | ||
| I mean, obviously, that was very kind. | ||
| I feel like whatever I say after that. | ||
| That is going to be a real letdown. | ||
| But it's my partner's birthday coming up soon. | ||
| Happy birthday. | ||
| And we have decided at this point, you know, I used to go out like four or five nights a week for a decade, you know? | ||
| Yeah, doing comedy. | ||
| And then in the past two, three years, it's just dwindled down to almost nothing. | ||
| Like, I just stay in all the time. | ||
| So we're going to start doing just weird, random stuff. | ||
| And so for her birthday this year, we have decided to go to a casino. | ||
| Ooh, fun. | ||
| Neither of us gamble. | ||
| Neither of us like to gamble. | ||
| You're gonna be overwhelmed. | ||
| It's basically a spin the wheel and we'll just go. | ||
| You guys are gonna be so overwhelmed. | ||
| Oh no, we're screwed. | ||
| We're screwed. | ||
| It's gonna be so depressing. | ||
| I don't think you understand the type of... | ||
| The cross-section you get when you go to a casino. | ||
| People just sitting there at the slots, just endlessly pulling. | ||
| Oh, I've been to Vegas twice, and it was the worst both times. | ||
| This one, I think, is going to be in... | ||
| In either Indiana or Michigan or Wisconsin or whatever. | ||
| Oh, it'll be way better. | ||
| So it's going to be a disgusting affair, but I can't wait. | ||
| It's just... | ||
| Put it on the list, man! | ||
| Spin the wheel! | ||
| That sounds depressing, but one fun thing that a friend and his... | ||
| I guess his wife did. | ||
| They would go and they would choose a random L-stop. | ||
| On a line that they don't usually go on. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And just get off and spend the day around that L stop. | ||
| That's a fantastic idea. | ||
| That's a way to have some kind of excitement, randomness, culture, and it won't be as depressing as going to the fucking casino. | ||
| And see the city that you fucking love so much. | ||
| Somehow we just do not see the city. | ||
| Stuff that wouldn't be on your normal beaten path. | ||
| Yep, that's way smarter. | ||
| Too bad, we're going to a casino, Dan. | ||
| I should tell you. | ||
| So, in Missouri, there's the Riverboat Casino. | ||
| That was a good, like, half-hour drive, maybe 45-minute drive from Columbia. | ||
| And so, me and my buddy, Nicky Gifts, and a burger. | ||
| I think some other people like to go, too, but those are the two buddies that I remember who, like, we would go to the casino. | ||
| Just go to the casino! | ||
| And we spent some time down there, wasted. | ||
| I don't know how this happened. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| That's a good start. | ||
| But I think Nick won like a free buffet at the casino. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| And we went on Valentine's Day. | ||
| Me, Burger, and Nicky Gifts. | ||
| That's the saddest place in the world. | ||
| We got a steak at the casino. | ||
| Oh, no. | ||
| Not finest moment, but I do remember it being pretty fun. | ||
| That sounds good. | ||
| There are worse ways to spend a few hours and a hundred bucks, right? | ||
| A couple of good buddies, a poorly cooked steak. | ||
| Yeah, what are you going to do? | ||
| Getting mad at Nick because he keeps winning on the three-card poker. | ||
| Five games of $10 blackjack and then it's all gone. | ||
| So, Jordan, today we have some episode to get into. | ||
| We're going to be talking about October 3rd and 4th. | ||
| Oh, I was slow. | ||
| Yeah, so I wanted to check in on Alex's response to, of course, losing these cases. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, yeah, yeah. | |
| By default. | ||
| Being a big loser. | ||
| Being a huge loser. | ||
| Losiest loser ever? | ||
| Quite a big loser. | ||
| Oh, man, what a big loser. | ||
| So October 3rd is Sunday's episode, and Monday is... | ||
| The fourth. | ||
| And so we're going to dive into this. | ||
| But before we do, let's say hello to some new wonks. | ||
| Oh, that's a great idea. | ||
| So first, Joy. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| You are now a policy wonk. | ||
| I'm a policy wonk. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Next, David. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| You are now a policy wonk. | ||
| I'm a policy wonk. | ||
| Thank you, David. | ||
| Next, Red the Red Kitty. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| You are now a policy wonk. | ||
| I'm a policy wonk. | ||
| Thanks, Red. | ||
| Next, Tiny Bullhorn Operators Union 42021. | ||
| And then my addition, Blackjack. | ||
| You are now a policy wonk. | ||
| I'm a policy wonk. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| And we have a technocrat in the mix, so thank you so much. | ||
| And hello to Marl Karks. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| I'm a policy wonk. | ||
| Crikey, mate. | ||
| That's fantastic. | ||
| Have yourself a brew. | ||
| How's your 401k doing, bro? | ||
| All right, we got to go full tilt boogie on this, Watson, all right? | ||
| Let's just get down to business. | ||
| We ain't making that money off that heroin. | ||
| Why are you pimp so good? | ||
| My neck is freakishly large. | ||
| I declare Infowar on you. | ||
| Thank you, Marl Kirk. | ||
| Yes, thank you very much. | ||
| Also, Brandy W. Indeed. | ||
| Sent an email. | ||
| Wanted to know if we had wished a happy birthday to Greg. | ||
| She had emailed us a long time ago. | ||
| During the time period when we were doing birthdays. | ||
| Let's make this clear. | ||
| We are not restarting birthdays. | ||
| That is not happening. | ||
| But during the time period wherein we had an obligation to birthday eyes. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Well, we didn't have an obligation, but we had a reasonable expectation. | ||
| And I think, yeah, she wanted to know when we had done it. | ||
| What episode was it on? | ||
| Right. | ||
| We might have. | ||
| Well, I'm almost positive we did. | ||
| I can't remember. | ||
| No clue. | ||
| So just in case. | ||
| Yes, 100% just in case. | ||
| From Brandy, we'd like to wish you a happy birthday, Greg. | ||
| Giving someone life is giving someone death. | ||
| You could say that... | ||
| Life is death. | ||
| Happy birthday. | ||
| Happy birthday. | ||
| So, Jordan, we jump in here on Sunday, Sunday, Sunday. | ||
| Oh, yeah. | ||
| And Alex has a headspace that he's in. | ||
| Obviously not good. | ||
| Oh, yeah? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why is that? | |
| Well, there's some law things. | ||
| But he knows that there's a difference between emotional reaction and thought-out... | ||
| Calm decision-making. | ||
| Okay, so he's about to tell us that it's fine for all of humanity to die, then. | ||
| Well, somebody's got to die. | ||
| We really should all just sit back for a moment and take a deep breath and cogitate or meditate or just think very deeply and very calmly and very serenely. | ||
| So stop, meditate, soak in. | ||
| And listen? | ||
| At a cerebral level. | ||
| And then we have to make decisions at a cerebral level and then emotionally, once we've made our decisions in a very calm way, use the emotions the good Lord gave us to very aggressively power our intellect against the globalists. | ||
| You can intellectually decide that you're going to do something like unscrew a despot's head. | ||
| But then if you're going to do it physically, it takes the horsepower psychologically, mentally, and physically to actually break that neck quickly and easily. | ||
| I just use that as a historical metaphor. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, what a very historical metaphor that is. | |
| Historically! | ||
| As we all know. | ||
| You must calmly decide to do something and then let your emotions take over as you kill. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah. | ||
| That was an adventure. | ||
| That was an adventure of like, hey, let's cogitate, let's think, let's think about that, let's cogitate all over this, meditate on it. | ||
| I want to tear a despot's head off. | ||
| Right. | ||
| So I need to emotionally prepare to tear it. | ||
| Take the emotion part out of it. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| If you just go on emotions, you won't be able to achieve your goal. | ||
| I won't be able to get there. | ||
| No, probably not. | ||
| Somebody will stop me in advance. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| Because I'll be like, hey, I'm going to tear your head off! | ||
| And the guys are like, no, we are not going to let you do that. | ||
| You need to focus in a zen state. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And get your resolve ready and know that your goal is to twist off despot head. | ||
| So I'll paint myself like the wall of a bank, and then when a despot walks by, I'll just appear and tear his head off. | ||
| See, now that's how you think things through. | ||
| You've been cogitating. | ||
| This is cogitation! | ||
| So, this is a no man's land of nonsense. | ||
| And then it gets worse, because a little bit into the show, we get a guest. | ||
| I'll give you one clue about who he is. | ||
| He's a health ranger. | ||
| It's Mike Adams. | ||
| Mike Adams joins us. | ||
| He did a great job reporting on a story that broke Thursday evening. | ||
| A lot of different angles to it. | ||
| He went with the angle of AI-powered... | ||
| DOD data analysis program named Project Solace shatters official vaccine narrative, shows ADE accelerating in the fully vaccinated with each passing week. | ||
| And there's other angles to it, but ADE is the big one. | ||
| And again, for people that saw this and didn't follow the links, I have a whole stack of articles here that I'll show TV viewers first. | ||
| This is from Mainstream News. | ||
| This is from the Pentagon's... | ||
| On site, effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines against the Delta variant amongst 5.6 million Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older. | ||
| This is a particular study. | ||
| It came out September 28, 2021. | ||
| It got discovered by a lawyer that's involved in these lawsuits against him, and it's now come out. | ||
| So this is put out by the Pentagon. | ||
| So first of all, it's important to note that this is Project Salus, not Project Solus. | ||
| Project Solus is a 2D platformer you can buy on Steam, whereas Salus is an AI initiative that's run by the Department of Defense. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Fair enough. | |
| The JAIC... | ||
| What about Project Cialus? | ||
| That's something else entirely. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| The JAIC, or the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center, launched Project Salus in March 2020 as, quote, a predictive tool to help identify where critical supply chain shortages were occurring during the pandemic. | ||
| Essentially, it compiled a ton of data together and used it to make predictions about where resources should be allocated. | ||
| This document that Alex is talking about that Mike Adams has apparently reported on is a PowerPoint presentation that was put together by Humetrix, a medical app developer who was seeking to answer some questions by consulting data from Project Salus. | ||
| The central questions they were concerned with had to do with vaccine effectiveness and whether or not it waned over time. | ||
| They were further interested in reduced effectiveness with the Delta variant and among people in subpopulations within the data. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Information that it would be hard to just compile and analyze on your own. | ||
| Essentially, they found that there may be some concern about waning effectiveness of the mRNA vaccines, but there's some huge caveats you have to give when discussing this PowerPoint presentation. | ||
| The first thing is that the data that they're using only covers people 65 and older. | ||
| It's not necessarily something that you can extrapolate out into the entire population. | ||
| Also, a very important point is that this is a PowerPoint presentation. | ||
| If you're looking at the slides, you can see what are basically the visual aids that someone has put together to help them in giving a lecture. | ||
| You're missing the essential context of the person's actual presentation which isn't being captured in the PowerPoint. | ||
| Case in point is slide number nine. | ||
| They were looking at vaccine effectiveness in a three to four month post-vaccination period and five to six months post. | ||
| This slide shows that their age distribution is heavily skewed, with people 85 and older making up 43% of the folks in the five to six month group, but only 14% in the three to four month group. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Conversely, people age 65 to 74 made up 51% of the three to four month group and only 24% of the five to six month group. | ||
| The fact that the five- to six-month group skews much older could introduce confounding variables that make the analysis more complicated, and as such, the slide includes a discussion question on the sidebar. | ||
| If you only have the PowerPoint to go off of, you have this discussion question, but you don't have the discussion. | ||
| Also, none of the stuff that Alex is saying about this having to do with ADE is real at all. | ||
| It's just made up explanations for data that they don't care to try to understand. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right, right, right. | |
| It's a bunch of bullshit. | ||
| They're going off a PowerPoint presentation. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Could... | ||
| Having a large number of people who, six months after anything, might be dead skew our results? | ||
| This isn't even about deaths. | ||
| This is about breakthrough infections. | ||
| I know, but yes. | ||
| I mean, obviously, there's no way that that can't have some effect on your data reporting. | ||
| But the data that's being presented in this PowerPoint presentation, if everything is above board, It does introduce some interesting questions for people to look into, but it does not introduce conclusions. | ||
| They're being unfair. | ||
| Now, I don't know. | ||
| If Mike Adams gets his hand on a PowerPoint presentation, that's all I need to hear. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| That's what I needed to know. | ||
| Mike, the Dramatic Ranger, is back. | ||
| It's over for humanity. | ||
| This has been on the Humetrix website as of Friday. | ||
| It was still live on there. | ||
| I don't know if it's there now, but this is DOD. | ||
| This is their JAIC, their artificial intelligence program. | ||
| So no one can argue that this is not some secret source somewhere. | ||
| This is open source intelligence. | ||
| What it shows, a couple of very important things. | ||
| One is that the negative side effects from the vaccine get worse over time with each passing week. | ||
| And so the negative outcomes, which includes hospitalizations and ICU outcomes, as well as deaths, it's very bad at three to four months. | ||
| Roughly doubles in about six months. | ||
| So this PowerPoint presentation has nothing to do with negative side effects of the vaccine that he seems to be applying? | ||
| I was gonna say, is he trying to say that when you get the vaccine you have negative side effects that only continue to get worse? | ||
| Apparently. | ||
| I mean, like, this document is entirely about the efficacy over time of the vaccine, factoring in age group as a variable. | ||
| Right. | ||
| While that was totally made up, it's fair to say that this slideshow does seem to indicate that there is an increase in breakthrough cases and thus a decrease in vaccine efficacy between the 3-4 month and 5-6 month groups. | ||
| Mike is ignoring all the context and the suggestions of possible explanations for the data presented because he has his own explanation that he just wants to jam down the audience's throat. | ||
| Also, on slide 6, it literally says that the rate of hospitalization dropped by a third, comparing breakthrough cases to people in the same age group who just got COVID before the vaccines rolled out in March to December 2020. | ||
| Not only that, in breakthrough infections, there was a 2.1% death rate among people age 65 and up compared to a 12% death rate in that same period between March and December 2020. | ||
| Mike is entirely misrepresenting this PowerPoint presentation in order to make a fraudulent argument against vaccination. | ||
| This is surprisingly weak stuff from the Health Ranger. | ||
| Oh, man. | ||
| I'm underwhelmed. | ||
| You know, since I was growing up, I always saw Rangers as like... | ||
| The lone. | ||
| Like, no. | ||
| The Texas. | ||
| Aragorn. | ||
| You know what I'm saying? | ||
| Sure. | ||
| I'm talking about Strider. | ||
| I'm talking about somebody who's just going from place to place, exiled, used to be a king or whatever, solving problems. | ||
| And this man is... | ||
| No Aragorn, sir. | ||
| No. | ||
| No Aragorn at all. | ||
| I would love for you to slap Mike Adams with a glove. | ||
| How dare you, sir! | ||
|
unidentified
|
I know Aragorn, and you are no Aragorn, sir! | |
| So, not only is Mike misrepresenting and misusing this data, he just decides that he can do whatever he wants with it. | ||
| Oh, that's nice! | ||
| Yeah, it's so fun when there's no rules. | ||
| I like it. | ||
| This looks like a flatline projection, so if we continue to project this out further in time to, let's say, 9 months or 12 months, which is coming up in our immediate future, It looks like this is going to triple the three-month negative effects or perhaps quadruple the three-month negative effects at 12 months. | ||
| And it looks like, Alex, that we're going to see probably, this is my estimation, this is not in the report, but by my estimation, we're going to see millions of Americans suffering severe hospitalizations and deaths over the next six months due to the vaccines. | ||
| So that's where we are. | ||
| So Mike's making all that up. | ||
| What he's saying is that he looked at this graph and he decided to draw what he wants after the data stops. | ||
| I was going to say, look, I mean... | ||
| That's all he's doing. | ||
| One year, I think Schwarber, I want to say it was 2019 maybe, 2018, 2019. | ||
| On the first at bat, Schwarber was leading off and he hit a home run. | ||
| This would be exactly like if Mike Adams was like, well, obviously he's going to hit 162 this year. | ||
| If he hits it one on one game, that's one every game. | ||
| Well, and not only that, but... | ||
| Every at-bat. | ||
| Exactly! | ||
| It could be anywhere from a 500 home run! | ||
| You'll never know! | ||
| Just based on the information in this PowerPoint presentation, there are very strong indications that Mike will be totally wrong with these predictions. | ||
| For one thing, he seems to be ignoring that this data is just a group of people 65 and older. | ||
| Secondly, because the age distribution in the 3-4 month group and the 5-6 month group is so different, there's not necessarily going to be this straight-line phenomenon Mike is predicting. | ||
| As time goes on, the average age of people getting vaccinated tends to go down because the elderly were a top priority initially for vaccination. | ||
| Naturally. | ||
| The proportion of the people aged 85 and older goes way down in the three to four month group and also the vaccine efficacy numbers go up. | ||
| It's entirely possible that there's some relationship between age and mRNA vaccine efficacy that we are yet to discover. | ||
| The point is that there's a lot of possible explanations for the data in this PowerPoint slide, and Mike is just making shit up so he can act like a dramatic little baby talking about millions dead on Alex, because that's how they have fun and make money. | ||
| Yeah, it's real sad. | ||
| It's real sad. | ||
| Like, I mean... | ||
| To take something that so obviously shows a massive improvement over not getting a vaccine and then being like, see, I bet after three months it's four times as bad as it was after two days! | ||
| But you know what? | ||
| If the numbers do show that there's a four times higher after nine months... | ||
| That will just be those people. | ||
| All that will be is an indication that it's even lower numbers for people in the later cohorts. | ||
| Yeah, exactly. | ||
| So, I don't know. | ||
| This is all stupid. | ||
| Insane. | ||
| So, there is one piece of information that is in this PowerPoint presentation that Mike latches onto that actually isn't all that surprising. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| So, the other major finding of this report is that the... | ||
| The number one most important factor that reduced serious complications over time was to have a previous COVID-19 infection. | ||
| So this document actually confirms that natural immunity is the number one best protective effect against negative outcomes following vaccination. | ||
| Let me state that in a little bit different way, because I know it sounds odd. | ||
| A lot of people are taking the vaccines even though they've already had the illness and been sick. | ||
| And so what we're finding is people that naturally already had it, even though this injection has compromised them and set them up for death, the body is so smart it's able to figure it out if it's already been in contact with it because it's the vaccine itself creating that in the body. | ||
| Is that right? | ||
| Is that right? | ||
| That's part of it. | ||
| Is that part of it? | ||
| If... | ||
| Here's the weird... | ||
| Start over. | ||
| This is really important. | ||
| This is really important. | ||
| So it makes sense that having had COVID previously would give you a leg up in terms of immune response. | ||
| A lot of the science hasn't been totally clear on the exact extent to which people become immune for COVID after they get it, but there is some effect. | ||
| It's, you know, we'll know more later. | ||
| Again, though, I need to stress that this data set is entirely comprised of individuals age 65 and older, and it's not sensible to think that this can be applied to the general population. | ||
| Alex confused himself there because the narrative on Infowars up to this point is that the mRNA vaccines train your body to attack itself. | ||
| And Alex has been very clear that he believes that if you get the vaccine after having COVID, you're as good as dead. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| It's gonna fucking kill you. | ||
| You got it. | ||
| This slideshow that Mike is covering shows some indications to the contrary. | ||
| So Alex has to figure out a way to dance around that in a ton of words, hoping that the audience doesn't realize that this is the exact opposite of what he's been saying for months. | ||
| I mean, it's just a fucking word salad he threw out there. | ||
| To avoid saying the very obvious thing. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I mean, oh God. | ||
| Because it's directly contradictory to this shit. | ||
| God, that's so... | ||
| You're so stupid. | ||
| Here's where things get a little bit dicey. | ||
| Just here? | ||
| A lot of places. | ||
| But this one might be... | ||
| This is our fork in the road. | ||
| When Mike comes on, there's usually something that's like, oh boy. | ||
| Oh, we're taking exit 121B to Diceville. | ||
| Oh yes. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| If you plan to get vaccinated, according to these data put out by the DOD, the number one thing that you can do to survive the vaccine is to get COVID before you take the vaccine. | ||
| That's in the data. | ||
| That's what it shows. | ||
| So for those people who have been infected and then they get the vaccine, they are probably likely to have lower incidence of negative outcomes versus people who never had any infection. | ||
| And the report says that shows how incredible our body is. | ||
| It gets it learns how it later gets the deadly vaccine and then isn't as apt to go into the ADE. | ||
| Yeah, exactly. | ||
| I appreciate the restraint, but I mean, like the implication that he's giving is like, if you're going to get the vaccine, go give yourself COVID first. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| This is getting dangerously close to him saying you should infect yourself on purpose. | ||
| The number one thing you can do to survive a bullet wound is to have it not hit you in the head or the heart. | ||
| So, the number one way to survive the vaccine is to not be killed by COVID one way or the other. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, I think that this is dangerous advice for a number of reasons. | ||
| A lot of reasons. | ||
| You put people around you at greater risk. | ||
| You could have severe complications. | ||
| You could die. | ||
| Yeah, this is... | ||
| I mean, he's supposed to be the health ranger. | ||
| Yeah, I think... | ||
| This is stupid. | ||
| Well, I mean, he did try and give everybody Ebola that one time. | ||
| Well, that was in the name of curing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, sure. | |
| For somebody who doesn't believe in vaccines, drink a little Ebola. | ||
| You put some vodka in there. | ||
| Put a little vodka in your Ebola and you'll have a good time. | ||
| You want to make sure it's disinfected. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Makes sense. | ||
| I mean, the thing that weirdly got me there is, is this the only way that they can get people to justify getting the vaccine? | ||
| Because I'm sure most of his audience has already had COVID. | ||
| They haven't been being safe whatsoever. | ||
| So is this like the angle that they're doing of like, listen, they're making you get the vaccine now. | ||
| We've got all these vaccine mandates. | ||
| But guess what? | ||
| If you've already had COVID, you're actually going to be fine with this vaccine. | ||
| I know I've been telling you that the vaccine is going to murder you and your family and your children and everyone you've ever met. | ||
| It might be a way to backdoor like a narrative. | ||
| Later, for the vaccine not killing everybody. | ||
| Yeah, exactly. | ||
| Then it could be like, well, you actually had COVID before you got the vaccine, and that's why it didn't kill you. | ||
| Totally. | ||
| I think that that's probably productive for them. | ||
| I think that would be a way around this. | ||
| But functionally, as it stands, it's also basically saying you should go get COVID. | ||
| Which sucks. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| It's like, hey, go and have a... | ||
| You know how kids used to have chicken pox parties? | ||
| Yeah, yeah. | ||
| Go do one of those. | ||
| And, I mean, one out of every, what? | ||
| Ten of you will die. | ||
| No big deal. | ||
| So anyway, Mike misuses some more of this data in order to claim that this is an ethnic bioweapon. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Yeah, exactly. | ||
| But also notice the last slide of this, slide 17. It also shows the ethnic groups that are most affected by this. | ||
| That's slide 17, and it shows that Native Americans have the highest rate of increased odds of negative outcomes. | ||
| So if you're Native American and you're getting this vaccine, you have about a 1.5 times higher risk of death and negative side effects compared to Caucasians. | ||
| If you're Hispanic, it's about a roughly 1.3 to 1.4 times greater odds. | ||
| If you're black, It's something more like 1.25, roughly in that range. | ||
| But the point is, this vaccine has ethnic effects that, you know, there have been many people out there warning about the possibility of this vaccine being a biological weapon. | ||
| This is not a responsible reading of this graph at all. | ||
| There is a higher risk of hospitalization in breakthrough cases among people of Native American populations, but this slide alone is not enough to demonstrate that there's a causal relationship. | ||
| Throughout the pandemic, if you cared to listen, people were talking a bunch about disproportionately high rates of infection and death among Native communities. | ||
| This is part of a longstanding conversation, and there are a number of hypotheses given for the numbers, including a higher rate of shared and intergenerational housing, decreased access to health care, and higher prevalence of COVID-19 comorbidities This is something relevant. | ||
| For sure, and it's something that researchers are keeping an eye on and discussing, but the way that Mike's talking about this stuff is just not, it's not connected to reality. | ||
| I mean, it does sound like he's literally saying that, once again, smallpox blankets are roaming across this land, tearing everybody to pieces, which is, I mean, not terribly wrong. | ||
| So now, in this next clip, what I think is just... | ||
| Spectacular. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Is that everything that Alex says is made up. | ||
| Okay, everything? | ||
| So I want to talk about that here in a few minutes, but just going back to this, because we could talk 10 hours about this, to have the Pentagon's main AI program that's all over the news, monitoring deaths, monitoring what's happening, and then they just put out a report, what it does, and they're honest about it, but no political statements are in it, and it says that you're way more likely to die if you've had these shots. | ||
| That it's erasing your regular immune system. | ||
| You said the opposite of that. | ||
| Turn way up, though, if it comes into contact with a similar virus, not just COVID, but any other coronavirus. | ||
| None of that's in the report and the primary sourcing that they're providing. | ||
| What is the Pentagon's main AI? | ||
| You know what I'm saying? | ||
| Which is the main one? | ||
| How? | ||
| Are they still using Hal? | ||
| I guess. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I would hope we're way past Hal. | ||
| I mean, at least Hal 11,000 by now. | ||
| Halbert. | ||
| Halbert? | ||
| Halliburton. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Holy shit. | |
| Holy shit. | ||
| Nobody in Halliburton's a real human being! | ||
| Crack the code. | ||
| It's all artificial intelligence! | ||
| Okay. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| That was great. | ||
| So Mike believes, without any kind of... | ||
| Proof. | ||
| That they're spraying cities with COVID. | ||
| Yeah, why not? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And then Alex has an interesting rejoinder. | ||
| Oh, okay. | ||
| Can they do aerosolized releases of these toxic nanoparticles this coming winter? | ||
| Could they release this in the United States? | ||
| Could they target a particular city? | ||
| Have they already done so in the past? | ||
| Personally, this is my opinion, Alex, but I believe they've already done so, and I think they're planning to do so again, and I think they are going to continue. | ||
| To commit genocide against not just the American people, but everybody around the world to try to drive people into the vaccines while they're crashing the economy and causing widespread suffering and death and destitution. | ||
| And as we said 20 months ago here on air... | ||
| They will then blame the unvaccinated for the vaccinated dying and others, but to cover it up, they'll then just spray the general public, like my dad and countless others, and almost kill them. | ||
| So apparently Alex's dad got sprayed. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Man, it is easier to say that your dad got sprayed than to take responsibility for almost killing your dad, Alex. | ||
| You almost killed your dad. | ||
| You, personally, almost... | ||
| Killed your dad! | ||
| Well, maybe not personally, but his behavior was such that it put his dad at a high... | ||
| There's a chance. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah. | ||
| But it's better if his dad was sprayed, other than saying that as a direct result of everything Alex believes, Alex's dad almost died. | ||
| Yeah, it's way more fun if a globalist came up with a little flower on his lapel, sprayed him with COVID. | ||
| Oh, no! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ah! | |
| Or maybe it was a seltzer bottle. | ||
| Ah, the seltzer bottle's good. | ||
| If you are putting it in a pie, I think you've gone too far. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| A cream pie is just... | ||
| Jordan, that's no longer aerosolized. | ||
| That's true. | ||
| That's true. | ||
| It's important. | ||
| Yes, good point. | ||
| You can transmit COVID via pie to the face, though. | ||
| Well, obviously it gets in your nose. | ||
| There is a meringue-based distribution. | ||
| There's a meringue-based distribution. | ||
| That is possible. | ||
| Well, I mean, it is October. | ||
| Obviously there's going to be some pumpkin COVID going around. | ||
| Pumpkin spice. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So two years ago or so, a little bit less, Mike Adams appeared on the show and declared that it was over for humanity. | ||
| There would only be lone survivors. | ||
| And he was right. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| So now here's his new dramatic prediction. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| My prediction is people are going to see troops on the streets by Christmas, and they're going to see bodies piling up in certain areas, of course, with a false narrative stating, no, it couldn't have been the vaccines, but this is what we're going to see. | ||
| This is the winter die-off. | ||
| This is the sort of soft coup military replacement of the infrastructure of first responders and medical workers, and you may have even, at some point, troops in certain areas at grocery stores checking your vaccine. | ||
| So, by Christmas, like in two months, two and a half months, we're going to have military on the street, guarding grocery stores, bodies piling up everywhere. | ||
| Okay. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That seems unlikely. | |
| An upgrade still over it's over for humanity. | ||
| There will only be lone survivors. | ||
| He's not going to compete with that. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| No. | ||
| You can't get more apocalyptic than it's going to be me and Dave over there against no one. | ||
| Right, right. | ||
| They really... | ||
| They shot their shot too early. | ||
| Yeah! | ||
| Fine! | ||
| It's over for humanity. | ||
| There will only be lone survivors. | ||
| It was way too early. | ||
| And then Alex has already done the I'm going to eat my neighbors thing. | ||
| Totally. | ||
| And that's like... | ||
| That's where you should... | ||
| We should do that. | ||
| When you've got the light. | ||
| When someone is giving you the light, that's when you talk about eating your neighbors. | ||
| Because you don't have another place to go after that. | ||
| Right. | ||
| They got stir-crazy because they assumed that the lockdown and the COVID thing wouldn't last as long, so they thought it would be fun to scaremonger about it. | ||
| I think they're like a comic who got overexcited and did their closer three minutes into their set. | ||
| Too bad. | ||
| Too bad. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Uh-oh. | |
| Oh, no. | ||
| Oh, shit. | ||
| Oh, boy. | ||
| I did not have 20. No. | ||
| And so the rest of the set is going to just end up being ranting about how you need to get right with God over and over again. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Come on. | |
| I want more soldiers. | ||
| I've been around other big national talk show hosts and others. | ||
| Everybody knows it's the end. | ||
| Everybody understands this. | ||
| And I feel so sorry for the public. | ||
| That's when people ask, hey, they say you lost your lawsuit. | ||
| You don't get a jury trial. | ||
| People go, that's unconstitutional. | ||
| Seventh Amendment. | ||
| They don't care. | ||
| They've all been told the country's going down, and they think they're the winners. | ||
| But, of course, they won't. | ||
| Everybody in the system that served it is going down as well. | ||
| In fact, they're most of the people that have taken the shots. | ||
| It's going to be Democrats dying in mass from the injections they've taken. | ||
| I mean, this is biblical. | ||
| Get right with God. | ||
| Get prepared. | ||
| Get ready. | ||
| Because this is going down. | ||
| It's going down. | ||
| Get right with God. | ||
| That's not going to happen, though. | ||
| It's just a lot of buffering. | ||
| Like, just a lot of filling time with these sort of... | ||
| Meaningless platitudes. | ||
| Yeah, I was really kind of hoping for maybe a Barnes. | ||
| I was kind of thinking that a Barnes would show up to let us know that it's actually, he actually won the lawsuit somehow and there's a secret double powerful constitutional amendment that we're going to have. | ||
| I feel like if you're Barnes or Norm and you're smart, you stay away. | ||
| Oh, you're gone. | ||
| You're out of the country. | ||
| You grow a mustache. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| I'm in Brazil, and I got clones. | ||
| That's what I'm doing if I'm Norm. | ||
| He responds a little bit more to the Sandy Hook stuff on Monday, because this is mostly about Mike Adams' Mike Adams seems to have paid for some time on the program. | ||
| Yeah, he wants a little bit of time. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So Rand Paul, who Alex loves and he won't debate you. | ||
| Staunchly refuses to debate me still. | ||
| He's acting like it's normal at times, right? | ||
| It's normal now, but it's not. | ||
| No. | ||
| It's not. | ||
| Democrats are going to be dead in mass. | ||
| Right. | ||
| What can the average person do to lessen the blow? | ||
| What can Congress do? | ||
| Because I see great people like Rand Paul and others. | ||
| They don't seem to know how much danger we're all in. | ||
| He's confronting Fauci. | ||
| He's talking about illegal spying, you know. | ||
| But they're still operating from their cocoon like everything's okay, but it's not okay. | ||
| I mean, everything's falling apart, and the hospitals are now full of the vaccinated who are seriously ill. | ||
| I'm not sure they realize how close we are to the end of the American empire, period. | ||
| The end of the dollar. | ||
| You see, the only way that they're keeping this going and the way that Biden is bribing all of the Democrat groups to carry out more voter fraud on the ground is through money printing. | ||
| So the money printing allows them to distribute these trillions of dollars. | ||
| They call it a COVID stimulus, but of course, as you know, almost none of it goes to anything related to COVID. | ||
| This just goes... | ||
| It gets funneled into other groups to keep the Democrats in power. | ||
| At what point have they ever been in power? | ||
| It will be, of course, catastrophic for the nation. | ||
| It would mean the end of America as we know it, at least. | ||
| Oh, man. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, the Democrats in power. | |
| That's very funny. | ||
| I just think that these villains that these dudes have, they're spreading themselves too thin. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Like, there's too many plans. | ||
| It just makes no sense. | ||
| Why do you have to do all these things? | ||
| One plan would work. | ||
| Historically, all right, the most successful plans are simple, they strike the enemy's weak point, and then they are done. | ||
| It is a quick, effective, and immediate solution. | ||
| All other plans are Rube Goldberg machines that make us look like we're idiots. | ||
| Like, say, I don't know, starting a war in Iraq or something. | ||
| Makes us look dumb. | ||
| Short, small, quick. | ||
| When you're the devil, you don't want to have different teams working on goals that are completely antithetical to each other and have nothing to do with the larger objective. | ||
| And that seems to be how the organizational chart works. | ||
| Here's what I'm thinking. | ||
| For Alex. | ||
| Alright, if I'm the devil... | ||
| I have all these people that are working for me, but I'm like, I'm the fucking devil. | ||
| I don't care about you. | ||
| Does he pay them in devil bucks? | ||
| Totally. | ||
| Well, I mean, the only way he can afford it is by money printing, of course. | ||
| That's what they do. | ||
| He calls it a stimulus. | ||
| The hell stimulus. | ||
| None of it goes to hell, Dan! | ||
| It's all tied up in the courts of heaven! | ||
| It's all this pork. | ||
| I'm just saying! | ||
| I would want to torture the people who loved me by... | ||
| Having them work against me. | ||
| See, I'm working at cross-purposes to them, so they're fucking up my plan, but actually, my plan is to torture them by making them fail forever. | ||
| You see? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Aha! | |
| Now I'm thinking like the devil, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Yeah, I guess that makes sense. | ||
| Yes! | ||
| Yes! | ||
| I guess that makes sense. | ||
| Fine. | ||
| That's as good as it's gonna get on anything else. | ||
| That's the point at which I have to give up. | ||
| Yeah, exactly. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| Oh, wait. | ||
| So you're fighting the devil whose plan is to have his followers fight against himself in order to torture them eternally because their plans will not... | ||
| Right. | ||
| I gotta go, man. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| Nope. | ||
| That's what it is. | ||
| I have other things I need to do. | ||
| No, no, no. | ||
| You need to stay and hear this because it makes sense. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mm-mm. | |
| So there's going to be a lot of planned disasters, according to Mike. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| But he won't give a time frame for it. | ||
| Although, if you've been listening, he already gave a bit of a time frame. | ||
| Well, December. | ||
| It's going to be an engineered famine situation, a release of another bioweapon, an energy collapse resulting in at least regional power grid disruptions, and then followed by, at the worst possible time, in my opinion, they're going to cause an economic catastrophe, which may be bank holidays, it may eventually be the actual collapse of the dollar itself, but we can't know the timing, so I'm not making that prediction for this winter. | ||
| It's just we know that's inevitable. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| You don't need all this shit. | ||
| You don't need all those things. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Also, I mean, all of those things have already happened in my lifetime. | ||
| And we've... | ||
| We've still not collapsed the dollar. | ||
| Like, we had the financial collapse in 2008. | ||
| We've had this fucking pandemic. | ||
| We've had so many power outages in the past year that people are shitting in the streets. | ||
| Right. | ||
| We're fine! | ||
| The reason that Mike does stuff like this, and it's scattershot, there's so many different things that just make no sense why someone would have all of these plans operating, is because, like, let's say that there is a famine. | ||
| Then he can be like, I called that. | ||
| Totally. | ||
| And let's say that, you know, all the other stuff does. | ||
| It doesn't come to pass, but there is a famine. | ||
| There you go. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Boom. | |
| I called this. | ||
| I know what I'm talking about. | ||
| Or there is some kind of a financial downturn. | ||
| This is what I was talking about. | ||
| As long as you make 100 predictions, people ignore that you got 98 wrong if two happen to be close to what ends up happening. | ||
| And the weirdest part is, to me, the weirdest part of all of this is that those things are all the inevitable... | ||
| End result of all of the people that he's ever supported getting power. | ||
| Like, all of those things just happen because of the people that you want in power. | ||
| That's how it works. | ||
| There's an irony to that. | ||
| So, but I mean, wouldn't you be better predicting it then? | ||
| You're making it happen, essentially. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well... | |
| You don't want to be too obvious about it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| That's fair. | ||
| So, you know, Alex lost these Sandy Hook cases, and it turns out there's a reason for that. | ||
| And, I mean, some people would say that the reason is because he flagrantly abused the discovery process and was being a total baby and an asshole. | ||
| It turns out that's not what Mike thinks. | ||
| Mike thinks that there's a more sinister reason that he lost these cases. | ||
| The devil. | ||
| Alex, it's going to get... | ||
| So bad. | ||
| I mean, I'm dedicated to staying on air as you are as long as possible. | ||
| And frankly, the reason they're coming after InfoWars with the judgment, you know, the witch trials. | ||
| You don't even get a jury. | ||
| The reason they're doing that is because I think they know there's going to be a secession or nullification. | ||
| We're going to have the Republic of Texas. | ||
| And InfoWars is going to be the news hub for the new free Texas, which is why you need to survive. | ||
| That's my take. | ||
| Well, I mean, for those who don't know, we gave them every document, everything they ever asked for, more than anybody ever did. | ||
| They removed one judge, put a new one in, and she said, first hearing, first real hearing, I'm defaulting you, you never gave us one document, and then they lie all over the news. | ||
| It's stunning. | ||
| Oh, man, stunning. | ||
| Also, I have bad news for Mike about Alex's relationship with the Republic of Texas. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Not great. | ||
| Not great. | ||
| Seems to hate those people. | ||
| Those folks are not friends. | ||
| No. | ||
| They all declare themselves president and everybody just dances around. | ||
| You know what? | ||
| I say this is actually a great idea. | ||
| Let's do the biggest experiment of its kind, alright? | ||
| We give conservatives the Republic of Texas. | ||
| Alex is their main news source. | ||
| Everybody else just watches. | ||
| Let's see what happens. | ||
| We'll have definitive proof on what a good country would be. | ||
| This is a dangerous experiment that you're proposing. | ||
| Oh, it's a dangerous experiment. | ||
| We'd nuke Mexico. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But, you know, left... | |
| You know, alone. | ||
| And just the world continuing as it is. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| What do you think is going to happen to the average leftist? | ||
| Oh, we're going to... | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| We're either going to be murdered by the devil or the vaccine or we're going to kill all the Republicans now, too? | ||
| This is the average leftist. | ||
| The average leftist. | ||
| Oh, we'll just be murdered. | ||
| Imagine what the average leftist who's all about not being ready and being totally dependent. | ||
| What are all the leftist pedophiles and drug addicts going to do when everything collapses? | ||
| Well, they're going to try to kill others to get the drugs and food that they want, but they have very little discipline and training, and most of them will be killed themselves. | ||
| Who are you? | ||
| Most of them are going to die. | ||
| Well, as the only people who have gone on air and said, I will murder people in the apocalypse, immediately murder my neighbors in the apocalypse. | ||
| Obviously, the first thing the average leftist is going to do is the thing that I have said that I will do. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| And I'm judging them for it. | ||
| They're so immoral. | ||
| I know that I have some friends who would probably classify themselves as leftists, and I do... | ||
| I constantly find myself sitting around with them and they just fucking won't stop talking about how much they love not being prepared. | ||
| Oh my god. | ||
| It's just like a constant obsession for people on the left. | ||
| Oh my god. | ||
| I love that people feed me. | ||
| I don't go anywhere. | ||
| I'm not prepared for... | ||
| What if the door is locked? | ||
| Not prepared. | ||
| No clue. | ||
| I even know some people who, if they accidentally find themselves in a position where they are prepared, will unprepare themselves. | ||
| I've got to. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. | ||
| I'm wearing shoes for this race that I'm about to run. | ||
| Better light them on fire. | ||
| They're opposed to cooking, because that's a preparation of food. | ||
| If you want to eat food, you eat the seeds. | ||
| And even then, you just eat dirt. | ||
| You just eat dirt. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| So I thought this was a... | ||
| Dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb show. | ||
| And then we get to about a half hour into the second hour. | ||
| Oh my God, it's all right. | ||
| And this is where Alex is at. | ||
| What an incredible time to be alive, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| I have a very important special report we're going to air at the start of the next segment. | ||
| And then he's got so much to cover tonight in Sunday Live, 6 to 8 p.m. | ||
| I've asked Harrison Smith who's going to be hosting those weekday mornings at 8 a.m. | ||
| American Journal here on the InfoWars Network. | ||
| He's going to come in and finish the last segment and a half to tell you what's coming up and hit some other news he's got, and then he'll be back tomorrow morning, 8 a.m. | ||
| I'll be back at 11 a.m., and Owen Schroyer will be back tomorrow. | ||
| Alex leaves half an hour early. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Just like, fuck it, I'm out of here. | ||
| Yeah, screw this. | ||
| I came in and I talked to Mike Adams. | ||
| Screw it. | ||
| Let the little dork finish the show. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. | ||
| Let boring white supremacy take over. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So before he gets out of the studio, though, he's got to try to pay them bills. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| And so he does a My Patriot Supply plug. | ||
| And, like, I just thought this was hilarious. | ||
| This is not how you do it. | ||
| Highest quality storable food for the lowest price you're going to find. | ||
| Can you pay three, four times more and get more gourmet that tastes better? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| But for food that's good and nutritious and quality, a lot of it tastes excellent. | ||
| Most of it tastes, you know, really good. | ||
| Some taste okay. | ||
| But that's just dishes I don't like. | ||
| You're not going to find anything near it for this price. | ||
| What? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What? | |
| Sure. | ||
| Can you pay more and get better stuff? | ||
| That's how everything works. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| This stuff is pretty good. | ||
| It's not great. | ||
| It's not great. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's pretty okay. | |
| I don't like some of it. | ||
| It's cheap. | ||
| Honestly, it's pretty much garbage. | ||
| This is shit. | ||
| Listen, there's going to be armed guards at my grocery store. | ||
| Buy this fucking food, otherwise you're going to show a vaccine passport. | ||
| If he talked for another three minutes, that's where he would have gotten it. | ||
| Yeah, totally. | ||
| He's so defensive. | ||
| It stinks, but it's calories. | ||
| Listen, you're going to need it. | ||
| Put it in your body! | ||
| Wow. | ||
| If I were my Patriot Supply, I might call. | ||
| I might give him a call after that. | ||
| What, are you going to survive off candy bars? | ||
| You're not. | ||
| Get them fucking food. | ||
| So, this InfoWars thing, right, that sells maybe bad food, it's like the rebel base in Star Wars. | ||
| We need to be on air when they take everything down. | ||
| I mean, the enemy already knows what we got, but if that means radio and... | ||
| Satellite relays, if that means our own power supplies, if that means our own microwave relays, I mean, you name it, we got it. | ||
| Looks like the Rebel base here, folks. | ||
| And the Imperial Walkers are marching towards us. | ||
| That means they're coming at you, too. | ||
| So people ask, how are you taking all this? | ||
| Man, I mean, I know what's going down. | ||
| I'm ready for it. | ||
| But understanding this. | ||
| So, who knows? | ||
| It could be your last chance any day to get Ultra 12 or to get down and out sleep support or to get... | ||
| Endgame or the new film COVIDland. | ||
| We're going to get an InfoWars t-shirt. | ||
| I mean, until we turn this around and arrest the globalists, because they're not going to stop until we arrest them. | ||
| Might be your last chance. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| Get a t-shirt. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Also, I don't know if Down and Out is the best name for your sleep. | ||
| That's... | ||
| Kind of a depressing name. | ||
| He's really not feeling that great. | ||
| Give him some down and out and we'll deal with him later. | ||
| Hey, can we get a new sleep aid called Fucking Depressed? | ||
| Oh, man. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Can we get a sleep aid called Can't Get Out of Bed? | |
| Oh, we've got a new product. | ||
| It's just called Despair. | ||
| It doesn't help you sleep, but you can't get out of bed. | ||
| We have a mood stabilizer called Ennui. | ||
| Guaranteed to remove your esprit de corps. | ||
| Look, it'll take out the highs. | ||
| It'll take out the lows. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It'll take out the fins. | |
| You'll just be constantly mildly annoyed. | ||
| You will be empty on the inside, staring from between glass eyes. | ||
| I might have given another pass on that name. | ||
| I think that might have sucked. | ||
| So yeah, he just does these plugs until Harrison comes in. | ||
| But he has a couple of news stories that he didn't have time to cover. | ||
| Oh, come on. | ||
| I've got an article right here I didn't have time to get to. | ||
| I'll play it tomorrow. | ||
| Where the head congressional individual over the spending package says we can, quote, spend whatever amount of money we want. | ||
| We're invincible. | ||
| I mean, he actually said we can spend unlimited amounts is the quote. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Unlimited amounts is the quote. | ||
| That's how it works. | ||
| It's imaginary. | ||
| It devalues everything. | ||
| But see, they get the money first while it has value. | ||
| They buy up real companies and infrastructure and farms and ranches and weapons and media. | ||
| And then we all get handed the debt and the inflation and the hell. | ||
| And then they say it's white men that are the problem. | ||
| But it's just globalists screwing us all. | ||
| It's totally wild. | ||
| You're seeing modern war. | ||
| The collapse has already begun. | ||
| It's accelerating. | ||
| You're in World War III. | ||
| You're being hit with bioweapons in the vaccines. | ||
| And then they blame those of us that are smart and don't take it as the ones that did it. | ||
| And I told you a year and a half ago that would happen. | ||
| And now it happened. | ||
| We know what we're talking about. | ||
| Please warn everyone. | ||
| There isn't much time left. | ||
| They've already injected half the public. | ||
| They're already dying. | ||
| That was a very fake bit of dramatics out to break. | ||
| Yeah, that one was very clearly like, he was like, oh no, I've still got three seconds, I better try, I gotta stretch. | ||
| I gotta amp it up. | ||
| I gotta stretch! | ||
| He is basically the sort of radio equivalent of somebody who has NOS boosters. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| You know, like he can hit that switch. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah. | ||
| It's that final quarter second. | ||
| But, I mean, you know, he is too soon a lot of the time. | ||
| Too early. | ||
| That'll happen. | ||
| So what are you talking about there about the budget thing? | ||
| That was about Representative John Yarmuth, who gave a speech back in June at a Rotary Club, and he touched on how we don't actually have to pay off the national debt. | ||
| Then I guess people are mad about this now, even though it was back in June. | ||
| He explained things pretty well, but Alex didn't have time to get into it today before he left work early, so I guess I'll wait until he covers it to get into the specifics about it. | ||
| What a dick. | ||
| Oh, man. | ||
| I mean, it is funny, just watching this whole debt ceiling thing, just being like, this is all made up. | ||
| This is all imaginary. | ||
| What are you people doing? | ||
| Why am I reading about it? | ||
| Why are you doing this? | ||
| This is all pretend. | ||
| Please don't make me pretend to care about pretend. | ||
| This is insane! | ||
| Yep. | ||
| What are we doing? | ||
| Mm-hmm. | ||
| So, we get to the 4th. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mm-hmm. | |
| And this will always be remembered as the day that Facebook went down. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| And we will deal with that in the middle of this episode. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| However, Alex is back from, like, Sunday. | ||
| I don't know what the fuck is going on on Sunday, because he just seemed to talk to Mike Adams for about an hour and a half and then leave. | ||
| And then leave. | ||
| I don't know what's going on. | ||
| I just didn't want to be there. | ||
| But there's an actual audience, maybe, for his Monday show. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, okay. | |
| The weekday show. | ||
| Right, right, right. | ||
| Can't phone those in. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So we get to talking about a little bit of the Sandy Hook business. | ||
| And look, when Alex is in trouble, so is America. | ||
| And that's important to remember. | ||
| That doesn't sound true. | ||
| I'm your host, Alex Jones. | ||
| And InfoWars has always been the canary in the coal mine. | ||
| For when you know InfoWars is in trouble, you know the country is on its knees and willfully sticking its head into the chopping block of the guillotine. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| Well, we've been at the top of Twitter all weekend since last Thursday. | ||
| The end of Alex Jones. | ||
| Jury finds Jones guilty of defamation. | ||
| Must pay. | ||
| Nobody knows Adam Lanza's name, the man that they say killed those children at Sandy Hook, the young drug addict, devil worshiper. | ||
| People don't know his name. | ||
| They know my name, though, because the corporate media constantly attaches me to a shooting that happened. | ||
| Almost ten years ago, and that I did question, is my right as American? | ||
| Because so much stuff has been staged. | ||
| A couple of quick points. | ||
| One, people do remember Adam Lanza, who he was. | ||
| Second, I would say that Alex has more name recognition than Adam Lanza because he has a fucking talk show. | ||
| And is somebody who constantly is trolling for attention for people. | ||
| Right, right, right. | ||
| And then also, if you listen carefully to that clip, it kind of sounds like Alex might still think Lanza didn't do it. | ||
| I am pretty sure he is, again, describing this in a way that suggests he is still denying Sandy Hook. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He says that they say he did it. | |
| Are we still doing this? | ||
| How is this possible? | ||
| He can't help himself. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. | ||
| Why even bother with the default judgment? | ||
| He's just admitted all of this shit yet again. | ||
| Well, he's implied that his mind is still there. | ||
| But the issue, dude, is that he's been jammed up. | ||
| He's been jammed up! | ||
| I mean, again, I've watched it... | ||
| And it's all him. | ||
| It's all him. | ||
| Democrat judge. | ||
| No, it's him hoisting himself upon a petard of his own build. | ||
| Democrat judge. | ||
| Oh, okay. | ||
| But yeah, I've got stacks of news here from those controlled corporate press where they don't tell you that a judge says, a Democrat judge that just got elected in Texas, same one trying to block the pro-life bill that's law. | ||
| She doesn't have that power as a county judge to do it, but she's trying. | ||
| And she took the case over from the last judge that just retired, and at the second hearing, said you didn't give him anything. | ||
| And Mr. Jones, you said this is a kangaroo trial on your show, she said in the ruling, a month ago. | ||
| The exact quote was, you said this is a show trial. | ||
| Well, I said when she said a month ago, now five weeks ago at a hearing, the second hearing, And I think I'm going to default you because you haven't given any evidence because the other lawyers said we hadn't. | ||
| It didn't matter what the proof was or the record or the depositions or all of it. | ||
| Yes, it did. | ||
| Yeah, and also the day before he was saying it was the first hearing and now it's the second hearing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| The story's a little janky. | ||
| Eh, don't worry about it. | ||
| So yeah, I don't buy any of this. | ||
| This is pretty soft. | ||
| So she said that I said this, but no, no, no. | ||
| What I actually said was this thing, and she said something different. | ||
| And I know you read what she said, and she said this, but what she actually said is what I say she said. | ||
| This is a very productive way to describe things. | ||
| Yeah, definitely. | ||
| And believable. | ||
| As somebody who watched the depositions and everything, it's very believable. | ||
| It's great. | ||
| Alex has a lot of credibility on the subject. | ||
| He comported himself with total class. | ||
| All I'm saying is that when that man defines reality, you know reality has been defined. | ||
| When that man defines corporate representative. | ||
| So yeah, I mean, really one of the only things to fall back on is like every attack on me is an attack on you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Of course. | |
| You have to personalize and experience this as an attack on yourself because I need you to give me money. | ||
| But for every attack you see on Infowars, you understand that's an attack on you, the infrastructure. | ||
| I mean, this announcement... | ||
| We'll cover next segment that you don't have juries anymore and that suits against Rachel Maddow get thrown out when she says things way more defamatory than I've said. | ||
| That's all okay because she has free speech, but I don't. | ||
| What things does Rachel Maddow say that was more defamatory than things you've said? | ||
| Yeah, go ahead. | ||
| Pull one of those out there. | ||
| Just go ahead and toss it out. | ||
| He doesn't give any specifics. | ||
| That's surprising. | ||
| I don't love Rachel Maddow, but like... | ||
| I don't think that you said more defamatory things than Alex. | ||
| I'm going to go way out on a limb. | ||
| Because I don't know if I can back this up. | ||
| But I'm going to say Alex is probably within the top ten all-time defamers of anything. | ||
| I mean, he probably is. | ||
| I mean, if you consider the reach of his program. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Like, the fact that he's been on air daily for 27 years or so. | ||
| I mean, yeah, and then you've got him, you've got William Randolph Hearst, I assume. | ||
| But how much of that was William Randolph Hearst doing himself? | ||
| Right, well, he wasn't writing it, but he was directing it. | ||
| He was very clear about directing public opinion through lies. | ||
| Sure, but then, like, you know, his news core, are you going to consider that? | ||
| Oh, that's a good point. | ||
| You can't consider, like, entities or bosses. | ||
| Right, right, right, right. | ||
| I'm talking about people who are saying the word. | ||
| Speaking direct. | ||
| Man, I don't know. | ||
| It's got to be tough to beat. | ||
| Alex is up there, but apparently Rachel Maddow is worse. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Anyway, look, he lost in court, so that means it's time to buy product. | ||
| That's all okay, because she has free speech, but I don't. | ||
| I don't. | ||
| You see, Tucker Carlson won't have free speech. | ||
| Well, you laugh. | ||
| Others won't have free speech under this model, and then the judges will simply say it doesn't matter how much. | ||
| Discover you give us on something that has nothing to do with what this case is. | ||
| We're just going to say you didn't and default you and say you're guilty and owe money. | ||
| That's a violation of the 7th Amendment on its face. | ||
| That guy's from the 7th Amendment police. | ||
| They're trying to get rid of jury trials for criminal stuff as well. | ||
| So that's why you need to understand when I tell you that we need your financial support, when I tell you that we're working with a lot of folks out there to make sure there's serious redundancy and a lot of other things, that takes money. | ||
| To fight this war. | ||
| And they realize they're losing that war, so they had to bypass the jury altogether. | ||
| But I need your financial support, so I'm going to tell you right now. | ||
| You never know, this will be your last chance today to get an Infowars t-shirt. | ||
| This is going to take a lot of money for me to pay my legal fees. | ||
| Yeah, I was going to say. | ||
| Ridiculous. | ||
| This is so transparent. | ||
| Just the staggering amount of, it's already over. | ||
| Right. | ||
| We're all dead. | ||
| The empire has collapsed. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Soldiers in front of grocery stores. | ||
| Uh-huh. | ||
| But! | ||
| Please buy a t-shirt. | ||
| If you buy a t-shirt. | ||
| So InfoWars can protect the Seventh Amendment or something. | ||
| If you buy a t-shirt, we can stay on air and defeat the globalists that, look, we're all going to be dead. | ||
| Right! | ||
| I'm gonna go to a water park. | ||
| Alex wants to be able to pay his legal fees. | ||
| I'm gonna get on a water slide instead of buy your shirt because you've told me you've failed, that it's all over, and that everything that you've done up to this point is meaningless. | ||
| I haven't checked back in on Owen's crowdfunding thing, but he fleeced people for like a quarter million dollars on that bullshit. | ||
| What an idiot. | ||
| And Alex is probably just trying to do the same thing. | ||
| He wants the audience to pay for his bad behaviors that he's now facing the consequences for. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Which, I mean, it's an alright business model if you're a shithead. | ||
| I am asking you, the people. | ||
| To once again protect me from feeling any negative effects for all the behavior I've done. | ||
| Because if things look bad for me, it's over for humanity. | ||
| Probably, even though it already is. | ||
| So anyway, the Seventh Amendment says, quote, In suits at common law where the value in controversy shall exceed $20, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved. | ||
| And no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States than according to the rules of the common law. | ||
| This would be relevant, except this only applies to federal courts, and very specifically not to civil cases being heard in state courts. | ||
| The Supreme Court has thrice affirmed that state courts have no obligation to provide jury trials for civil cases, but many do anyway, just sort of as a formality. | ||
| Yeah, because why not? | ||
| Alex's rights have not been violated at all. | ||
| He does not know what the Seventh Amendment is. | ||
| I do love, I do love sometimes you really, you know, like, you know the stuff is in there, but then you go back and you actually hear it, and you read it. | ||
| You read it again and again, and you're like, wait a second. | ||
| We're still listening to a constitution that has a Seventh Amendment that includes a dollar amount in it. | ||
| Like a $1776 amount of $20 being like... | ||
| Holy shit, this is worth a million dollars in today's money. | ||
| I don't know for certain, but I would bet that that has been updated. | ||
| I'm sure, I'm sure. | ||
| But it is like, what are we doing? | ||
| Rewrite the fucking thing. | ||
| We live in the future. | ||
| $20, get the fuck out of here. | ||
| Come on, man. | ||
| $20, oh man. | ||
| This is for 1950. | ||
| What are we talking about? | ||
| So, look. | ||
| The point is that Alex has been smeared. | ||
| Of course. | ||
| So let me show you some of these news articles here we've got. | ||
| And again, this is a lot bigger than Alex Jones. | ||
| And I want to show TV viewers and radio listeners can pull this up. | ||
| An article out of the Associated Press was posed to the most respected publication in the world from almost three years ago in 2019. | ||
| In June. | ||
| Two and a half years ago. | ||
| Father of Sandy Hook victim wins defamation lawsuit against Alex Jones. | ||
| Alex Jones is the host of the conspiracy-driven Infowars website and wrote a book titled Nobody Died at Sandy Hook. | ||
| That's defamatory. | ||
| I didn't write a book called Nobody Died at Sandy Hook. | ||
| I'm not in the book. | ||
| When we called the Wall Street Journal that also published this NAP, they said, go ahead and sue us. | ||
| We're not going to retract it. | ||
| And then about a month later, they took away my perfect corporate credit rating because of this, saying I lost a suit and used that to charge us more. | ||
| For credit card transactions and a bunch of other stuff. | ||
| That's just an example of true defamation. | ||
| That's probably not true. | ||
| But we've covered this before, and in case anyone's forgotten, Alex has a good argument here, just not against the Associated Press. | ||
| The headline that Alex is reading is from Market Watch, and someone who works there definitely fucked up and attributed the writing of that book to Alex. | ||
| The Market Watch page is just an article that's reposted from the Associated Press, but with a new headline that Market Watch wrote, which does not appear in the original AP story. | ||
| Right. | ||
| On the AP website, the headline is, quote, Newtown parents score a win in growing fight against hoaxers. | ||
| And it's never claimed that Alex wrote Fetzer's book. | ||
| As for the Wall Street Journal, I can't find that article posted on their site, but this is an important dynamic to understand. | ||
| Alex can threaten to sue the AP all he wants. | ||
| They didn't do anything. | ||
| His beef is with Market Watch, and I've never heard him complain about them. | ||
| And I think that this is intentional. | ||
| I'm sure that Alex knows that if he just contacted MarketWatch and complained about this very demonstrably not true claim, they would immediately retract it and probably even issue an apology, which doesn't work for Alex. | ||
| No, that's no good. | ||
| That's not good for him. | ||
| He gets much more out of it by constantly pointing to the headline and blaming the wrong entity for it and saying that they won't own up to something they didn't do. | ||
| Yeah, exactly. | ||
| And it's just a stupid game that he's playing. | ||
| But he's been smeared! | ||
| Oh, boy. | ||
| So smeared. | ||
| So anyway, what you do is you point to this, this headline, and you use it to imply that all the headlines about you now are not true. | ||
| Hey, if one happened, then the several other thousand are probably... | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Yeah, that makes sense. | ||
| So when you see that, remember when you then hear, I just lost a lawsuit to look a little bit deeper. | ||
| Let's go through these right now for TV viewers and radio listeners, but TV viewers can see these. | ||
| Sandy Hook. | ||
| Alex Jones loses case over hoax remarks. | ||
| Loses case. | ||
| BBC. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Father Jones. | ||
| Alex Jones loses two more Sandy Hook cases. | ||
| Oh yeah, like each lawyer files like four or five moments of bankruptcy. | ||
| Father Jones. | ||
| Alex Jones loses losses over Sandy Hook hoax conspiracy. | ||
| ABC News. | ||
| Same folks told us there were WMDs in Iraq. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| The reason there are multiple cases isn't because lawyers are filing multiple. | ||
| It's because there's multiple plaintiffs who have different... | ||
| Complaints about things that you said about their kids. | ||
| No, whenever you sue somebody, you get a law firm, and all of those lawyers each bring their own individual suits. | ||
| That makes perfect sense. | ||
| That's how law works. | ||
| Well, I mean, Alex just has to find a way to make this fight between him and lawyers as opposed to humanizing the people behind it who are the real victims. | ||
| And Alex can't accept that because he's the real victim, according to him. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| It's really sad. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, I'm waiting for... | ||
| He might as well have a you-can't-handle-the-truth moment where he's like, look, I'm obviously the real victim because nobody died there. | ||
| And then everybody's like, see, we fucking told you! | ||
| This is what it was! | ||
| Jesus. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So anyway, he just reads every headline about himself. | ||
| He's got time to fill. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Raw story. | ||
| Now, let's start being more honest here. | ||
| Alex Jones fumes after judge rules he must pay for his Sandy Hook conspiracy theories, but not after a jury trial in violation of the Seventh Amendment. | ||
| She lies, which is a clear lie, and says we've given him nothing. | ||
| And then she goes, and he says this is a show trial. | ||
| Well, I did say that a month ago when she announced I'm probably going to default you. | ||
| You've given us nothing. | ||
| 81,000 pages? | ||
| Two depositions with myself and my whole crew? | ||
| Because we don't have what you claim we have? | ||
| The battle plan to say Sandy Hook was a hoax because it'd make us so famous when it was something I barely covered nine years ago? | ||
| Imagine they say, give me the smoking gun. | ||
| I don't have the smoking gun, but okay, you don't get a jury trial then because we have no case. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Good spin, I guess. | ||
| Give me the smoking gun. | ||
| I don't have it. | ||
| Well. | ||
| Nothing we can do then. | ||
| I guess we'll have to ramroll you. | ||
| I guess we have to get a default judgment against you. | ||
| Oh boy. | ||
| You didn't give us the smoking gun. | ||
| This also really, really heavily implies an accusation of collaboration between the plaintiffs and the judge. | ||
| In order for Alex's argument to make any sense, it has to be a united conspiracy against him. | ||
| I think it's become a nice, fun joke amongst people that they get their Soros checks. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| You know, these protesters. | ||
| Everybody loves it. | ||
| Getting our Soros checks. | ||
| I regret to inform you that Soros is actually involved with this plot against Alex. | ||
| Oh, no. | ||
| And this judge is known. | ||
| She just got elected a year ago as a former CPS lawyer. | ||
| She is known as an absolute... | ||
| I mean, the things that the Democrat lawyers and everybody say about her, I'm not going to repeat here, but I mean, it's all Soros. | ||
| I mean, Soros put the DA in here. | ||
| He funded her through these PACs. | ||
| I mean, it's Soros, folks. | ||
| Soros is doing this to me. | ||
| He's going to do it to you, too. | ||
| That is just like... | ||
| I mean, it's parody. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Soros is doing this to me, and he's going to do it to you. | ||
| I mean, this guy is really... | ||
| You kind of have to think he's playing with house money right now because he's about to be like, and I think we should put a million dollars out for anybody who takes care of this judge for me. | ||
| Like, he's so close. | ||
| Well, I think he learned his lesson about that. | ||
| When you do stuff like that, you end up paying $100,000 in sanctions. | ||
| Right, right, right. | ||
| So Judge Gamble actually ran unopposed for this seat in the 459th District Court back in 2018. | ||
| Soros probably had to dump a ton of money in there to make sure she beat the lack of opponent she was up against. | ||
| Well, I mean, the lack of opponent had so much more name recognition right out of the gate. | ||
| You know, everybody knows no one. | ||
| It's true. | ||
| So all Alex really has to go on is just pointing to this Market Watch headline over and over again and using it to sort of imply that any stories about him now are not true. | ||
| So they had an article saying Alex Jones loses suit for writing a book Nobody Died at Sandy Hook. | ||
| And we call AP up and have a law firm send them a letter. | ||
| I mean, a big lawyer. | ||
| Norm Pattinson, a big famous lawyer. | ||
| They just said, go ahead and sue. | ||
| Okay, so I didn't write that book. | ||
| I didn't lose that suit. | ||
| But it created the thing that I'm guilty. | ||
| That's why I was up at The Blaze doing shows. | ||
| And I had two different hosts ask me, hey, so you lost those Sandy Hook suits. | ||
| This is last week before this happened. | ||
| And I said, no, they just said that to create that illusion. | ||
| Fake news. | ||
| But I said, I will. | ||
| They're going to default me very soon. | ||
| And they did that. | ||
| I was walking out of the building when I just told somebody that, and I get the phone call that it happened Thursday. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| How did you know? | ||
| Could it be because you were told repeatedly? | ||
| You were given constant warnings that your behavior was going to precipitate this kind of thing? | ||
| You don't need psychic dreams to figure this one out. | ||
| No. | ||
| And also, that MarketWatch headline had nothing to do with creating the illusion of Alex's guilt. | ||
| No. | ||
| His actions did that. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So this case, I mean, it's a setback, obviously. | ||
| Alex needs money. | ||
| But he doesn't want you to think that this is the biggest issue. | ||
| Mic down for this. | ||
| This clip is fucked up. | ||
| But see, behind the scenes, they've done far worse things than for strategic reasons I'm not going to say. | ||
| To my family. | ||
| To my loved ones. | ||
| To people I know. | ||
| I mean, folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Folks. | |
| Look. | ||
| Let's just say some people in my family ended up dead just to give me a message and I didn't back down. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| So, this stuff is nothing. | ||
| So, apparently, the globalists have killed some of Alex's family members. | ||
| Oh my god. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| I'd like some specifics on this. | ||
| I would like names, dates, as well as method of death and so on and so forth. | ||
| And why you're not dead because you didn't back down. | ||
| Totally. | ||
| Typically, if some kind of giant mafia cartel syndicate or whatever kills somebody as a warning to somebody else, when they don't back down at that point, they get killed. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Because the warning... | ||
| The warning is before you kill somebody. | ||
| The warning is a murder. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| And then the follow-through is more murder. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| But you're pot committed once you've already committed the murder. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| You're in. | ||
| You're not going to back down. | ||
| No. | ||
| Why would you? | ||
| That's why you do it. | ||
| You've already committed a murder. | ||
| That's why you send the message. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| Boy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oof. | |
| They are bad at what they do. | ||
| Yeah, so anyway, I don't believe any of this. | ||
| No, absolutely not. | ||
| Folks. | ||
| Folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It made me think of Tommy Mac. | |
| Comedian Tommy Mac. | ||
| Yes, that is. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Folks. | |
| That is. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's fantastic. | |
| I'm just waiting for Alex to say, like, you think I give a fuck? | ||
| Anyway, I hope the Seventh Amendment has been violated. | ||
| Sure, sure, sure. | ||
| And that's where we are. | ||
| Look at the Seventh Amendment, just in case you're tuning in. | ||
| And, oh, well, it's okay to have a judge say you're guilty. | ||
| No, not unless you allow a judge to try. | ||
| You can give away your Seventh Amendment right, but you cannot do it unwillingly. | ||
| This is from the Seventh Amendment. | ||
| Might have heard of it. | ||
| In suits of common law, the value in controversy shall exceed $20. | ||
| The right of trial by jury shall be preserved. | ||
| And no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States. | ||
| Well, hell, the judge up front examined it and said, I decide you're guilty, no jury. | ||
| So that's a total violation. | ||
| Then according to the rules of common law, which goes back to Magna Carta 1215, total violation of that, and it violates the Sixth Amendment as well. | ||
| Now, that's your rights being stolen. | ||
| That's your birthright being stolen. | ||
| Alex's Seventh Amendment rights don't apply to state courts, so this argument sucks. | ||
| But his claim that his Sixth Amendment rights have been violated are even sillier. | ||
| So the first four words in the Sixth Amendment are, quote, in all criminal prosecutions. | ||
| What about it? | ||
| This just doesn't apply to his civil suit at all. | ||
| Okay, okay. | ||
| Now, I get it. | ||
| Those two amendments, they don't apply. | ||
| No. | ||
| Tell me where the Magna Carta does not protect him. | ||
| Because under the Magna Carta, which as I remember it... | ||
| 1215. | ||
| ...maintains its status as forever law. | ||
| Right. | ||
| I'm not sure that Alex really has a really good grasp on this Constitution and Bill of Rights that he loves so much. | ||
| Not a big fan. | ||
| He's taken two bites at this apple, and both are rotten. | ||
| No. | ||
| As I've stated 10 million times, the people who have a pocket Constitution understand it not at all. | ||
| Right. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| You add it as a prop. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah, 100%. | ||
| Anyway, the U.S. is being taken over. | ||
| By whom? | ||
| Globalists. | ||
| Again? | ||
| Haven't they already taken this over? | ||
| America is in the process of being looted and absorbed and bankrupted right now. | ||
| They're going to use a race war to try to cover that all up, what they've done. | ||
| And I would just tell you, get ready and dig in. | ||
| Because this country's going under judgment. | ||
| All right, we'll be right back with the design collapse and where that's going to go next. | ||
| I said it earlier, and I just kept having this feeling that the globalists have too many fucking plans. | ||
| Why do they need all of these plans? | ||
| Like, no evil organization would do this to themselves because so much of it just doesn't matter. | ||
| Like, what does the U.S. economy collapsing matter if 90% of the population is killed off by a vaccine bioweapon? | ||
| That will happen on its own. | ||
|
unidentified
|
None of this makes sense because Alex is just making it up as he goes along. | |
| You don't need a race war to cover up the collapsing economy or whatever. | ||
| Furthermore, let's just get this real straight. | ||
| They do not need to cover up anything because we just saw the Pandora Papers come and go so fast. | ||
| We know! | ||
| Like, we saw it all! | ||
| We've got it all written down, and we still don't care. | ||
| I think people were more interested in how much Twitch streamers made than... | ||
| You are 100% correct. | ||
| But yeah, so what Alex is doing is basically just bigoted, narcissistic, paranoid jazz. | ||
| Like, he has the skeleton of these ideas in place, and he just kind of riffs out about whatever he's feeling on these established themes. | ||
| That's why you'll get, like, the globalists having a hundred different plans that seem at odds with each other or completely contradictory or... | ||
| Seem to be working towards different goals. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| It's because Alex is just making it up based on his feelings. | ||
| Yeah, I'm really amazed that you can even try to cover up what they're doing. | ||
| No. | ||
| No one's covering it up. | ||
| It's all very obvious. | ||
| You look at the... | ||
| Okay. | ||
| This senator received $100,000 from this company and now they vote differently. | ||
| Yeah, no shit. | ||
| They're not covering it up at all. | ||
| It's obvious. | ||
| You pay for law. | ||
| That's fine. | ||
| We all get it. | ||
| It's not fine. | ||
| It's super bad. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| But it's how we live. | ||
| So, the supply chains have broken down, my friend. | ||
| Yeah, that's true. | ||
| And basically what this amounts to is that Alex needs money. | ||
| The country and the world is in cardiac arrest. | ||
| They said they would do it the damn Great Reset, and I told you. | ||
| And then we're sitting here running out of our supply chains, running out of product to even fund ourselves. | ||
| That's why we need everybody to go to InfowarStore.com. | ||
| You've never needed your support now that we need it here to not just stay where we are, but expand. | ||
| But we either expand or we implode at this point. | ||
| Expand. | ||
| I need to expand, and I'm not going to get into strategic regions for hearing you on air. | ||
| That gives the enemy too much information. | ||
| But listen, I need financial support right now. | ||
| So go to InfoWarsStore.com, click on the support button at the top, go to the donation area, give a one-time donation, give a long-term donation, you can do recurring donations, give a hundred bucks. | ||
| I need the funds to fight the globalists. | ||
| I need the Oh man, what a coincidence that he lost a bunch of cases and now he's... | ||
| Mysteriously at a point where he desperately needs the funds to fight the globalists. | ||
| No, no. | ||
| He needs to expand. | ||
| Oh, man. | ||
| There can't possibly be a one-to-one parallel here. | ||
| Now that I am on the hook for an almost about-to-be-astronomical amount of money. | ||
| An unknown amount that could be a disaster. | ||
| It is time for me to expand my operation. | ||
| And I need your money to do it. | ||
| And I'm going to need your money. | ||
| And I also am not going to tell you the things that I'm going to do. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Because that would give them two... | ||
| Right. | ||
| It's going to be paying off my legal fees. | ||
| I will be doing that. | ||
| And also, did you read the Pandora Papers? | ||
| It is very easy to offshore your money and they won't get it. | ||
| Wouldn't the globalists hate it if I could pay my legal fees? | ||
| Help me. | ||
| And it'll come as a shock to them. | ||
| I'm not even going to tell them what my plans for this money of yours is. | ||
| And when I pay off my lawyers, they will be blown away. | ||
| The globalists will be like, oh no! | ||
| So Alex, you know, the Great Reset is something he's very afraid of. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| And he lies about it a little bit here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, obviously. | |
| And I'm looking for the book. | ||
| Ah, here it is. | ||
| COVID-19 and the Great Reset. | ||
| I don't like Klaus Schwab. | ||
| I'm not advertising his book, but this was out a month after the COVID crisis began. | ||
| It was already pre-written, and it was already pre-planned. | ||
| I'm going to talk about it here right now. | ||
| So Klaus Schwab's book, The Great Reset, was released in July 2020, which is a little bit more than a month after the COVID crisis started. | ||
| Mm-hmm. | ||
| You know, using things that seem like trivial facts, getting you to accept them will bring you closer to accepting his completely nonsensical conclusion. | ||
| Totally. | ||
| It's a manipulation strategy. | ||
| And also, it's just kind of, it's very fun because he can just be like, see, there's no way anyone could write a book in a month. | ||
| That's not possible. | ||
| I've never heard of Isaac Asimov. | ||
| Fuck all of you. | ||
| I have no idea, you know? | ||
| Right, right. | ||
| You could write a book in a month, first of all. | ||
| But second of all... | ||
| It's not even about that. | ||
| It's about making the ultimate conclusion slightly more believable. | ||
| Sure, sure, sure, sure. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Totally. | |
| Trapping you in acceptable distortions. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| So anyway, there's a Polish journalist who is not allowed to go into the United Kingdom, and Alex is mad about this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| The social credit score is here. | ||
| Polish journalist denied entry to the UK over his opinions. | ||
| Big article and video on Infowars.com. | ||
| Criticizing the EU, criticizing globalism, criticizing the lockdown. | ||
| Sorry, you can't come here. | ||
| So this is about a man named Rafal Zimkiewicz. | ||
| If you're wondering, he wasn't barred from entering the UK because of his views on globalism or the lockdowns. | ||
| As it turns out, he's one of the very fortunate folks to be on the home office's list of people who are such shitheads that they can't enter the country. | ||
| This illustrious list includes Americans like Fred Phelps of the Westboro Baptist Church and Alex's buddy Michael Savage. | ||
| Typically these are people who are bigots and they have a history of agitating and I guess the UK government is smart enough to just say we don't want that kind of bullshit over here. | ||
| You cannot come. | ||
| There is something nice about being a sovereign nation that can just say... | ||
| You're a dick. | ||
| You can't come. | ||
| Your values are antithetical to what we believe in, and you have a proven track record of agitating people and causing a public nuisance. | ||
| Right, but it's the UK. | ||
| I mean, they don't. | ||
| You know, they've got Nigel Farage. | ||
| They've got all of those people. | ||
| They've got enough, but it's like, you're a dick, and we don't want you. | ||
| Yeah, we can't kick Nigel Farage out. | ||
| We can't kick Nigel Farage out. | ||
| We cannot let you in. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| Barts. | ||
| Plural. | ||
| As for this guy, Rafal, he's a bigot mostly of the anti-Semitic, Islamophobic, and homophobic variety. | ||
| The reality is that he's someone who has called the Holocaust a myth. | ||
| And Alex is trying to whitewash away these details and only present him as a Polish journalist because, I mean, that's what he does. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Yep. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| So, you know, if you have people telling you that you shouldn't say the N-word... | ||
| It's a slippery slope. | ||
| I am going to go way past you. | ||
| You shouldn't even need to. | ||
| Right. | ||
| I agree with you, but I think Alex thinks it's a slippery slope. | ||
| That's the real threat, is the globalist, is the social credit score. | ||
| And so many folks are saying, oh, we better do what we're told. | ||
| You know how that works? | ||
| Do what I say. | ||
| I'll ban you if you use the N-word. | ||
| I don't ever use the N-word, so, okay, ban them. | ||
| Oh, now don't say mother or father. | ||
| Now, oh. | ||
| I'm sorry, did that happen fast? | ||
| On government forums all over and schools, you name it. | ||
| Oh, okay. | ||
| You know, don't use the word manhole. | ||
| That's another bad word. | ||
| See, there's always something. | ||
| They're always going to move the gold post. | ||
| While the left runs around, the article's on Infowars.com, and says that white people are inherently bad and are parasites and are evil mutants. | ||
| That need to be put away. | ||
| I've got an article from Infowars.com with exactly that headline. | ||
| That's where we are. | ||
| So, first of all, none of the words Alex is saying are banned are actually banned at all. | ||
| You can say the N-word if you want. | ||
| There just might be consequences for doing so. | ||
| Yeah, that's how it works. | ||
| You can say mother and father all you want. | ||
| They were just conversations about making terms used on official documents gender neutral so as not to stigmatize same-sex parents. | ||
| There you go. | ||
| Alex is rambling about nothing, and it kind of just feels like he wants to say the N-word. | ||
| That's just what it feels like. | ||
| Tends to be that way. | ||
| As for that thing about white people being mutants, this is one of Alex's big headlines for the day. | ||
| The left didn't say that. | ||
| It was just one person named Francis Cress Welsing. | ||
| Welsing was an Afrocentric activist, and I think it might be fair to describe her beliefs as being black supremacist. | ||
| Uh-huh. | ||
| I'm not sure what site people are referring to, but you can find a number of message board posts by people who are very mad that a, quote, Black History Month website quoted her. | ||
| I have no idea what's going on, and I can't find a link to the site in question, and even if you assume it's all true, Alex's presentation of it is still bullshit. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| It's nonsense. | ||
| And I didn't even cut this clip out, but at one point in the episode, Alex is like, yeah, you know what? | ||
| We are all mutants. | ||
| Oh, great. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Great. | ||
| Then you retract your complaint? | ||
| I guess you're fine. | ||
| So, look, it's too late for the NWO. | ||
| The new, new, new, new, new world order. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Kevin Nash. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| Scott Hall. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Hulk Hogan. | ||
| Hollywood Hulk Hogan. | ||
| Somebody else who likes to say the N-word. | ||
| True. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| And destroy journalism. | ||
| It's too late for them. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Because Alex is too credible. | ||
| You're being conquered. | ||
| I'm being conquered by a multinational globalist force. | ||
| I've been on air 28 years fighting it. | ||
| And now it's all out in the open. | ||
| So you see, I can't be on air. | ||
| I've got to be destroyed. | ||
| I've got to be shut down because our credibility is so high. | ||
| They don't want us on air now that everybody believes what we're saying and checks into what we're saying and follows up on it. | ||
| But I got something for the New World Order to know. | ||
| Your whole takeover's not going well. | ||
| Your whole forced vaccine program's stalling. | ||
| And it's too late. | ||
| Everybody knows I'm right now. | ||
| Too late, New World Order. | ||
| Too late. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We know that the 1% globalist elites have hijacked and subverted the U.S. economy, culture, and government. | |
| The battle to take America back begins with Scott McKay, the Patriot Street Fighter, and his advancing the fork-in-line tour. | ||
| Now here's Scott. | ||
| Hi, this is Scott McKay, better known as Patriot Street Fighter, the high-octane, full-throttle truth hammer. | ||
| I don't really care to respond to Alex's claims that he's too credible to be allowed on air. | ||
| Just let that sit there. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| That commercial sounded weird, though. | ||
| That was... | ||
| It's too late, Globalists! | ||
| It's too late! | ||
| Hi, everybody! | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're gonna have a good time with the Patriot Fighter! | |
| So, Patriot Street Fighter, the Truth Hammer, what is this local market-ass commercial doing on Alex's big-time important show? | ||
| You think Putin cares about the Street Fighter Patriot guy? | ||
| Nonsense. | ||
| So, I decided to learn a little bit more about who this guy is, and I found his Twitter. | ||
| This is a guy named Scott McKay, and this is his bio. | ||
| Quote, former competitive bodybuilder, wellness industry entrepreneur, former political consultant, campaign manager, radio talk show host, Q Patriot Street Fighter. | ||
| Huh. | ||
| Q Patriot Street Fighter. | ||
| Conveniently dropped that part off for the commercial. | ||
| Seems like it. | ||
| Q Patriot Street Fighter, you say. | ||
| It seems like Alex will just advertise for anything and anyone. | ||
| He doesn't give a fuck, man. | ||
| He's called Q a globalist deep state setup, and here he is taking ad money to promote the Q Patriot Street Fighter speaking tour. | ||
| Hey, the enemy of my enemy is my friend when it comes to me needing money to fight these fucking lawsuits. | ||
| I guess so. | ||
| I scrolled down a little bit on his Twitter page, and I saw a picture of him, and I immediately realized he's a dude that I've seen as a guest on Project Camelot, and we might have actually talked about him on the podcast. | ||
| Get the shit out of here. | ||
| I think we talked about the Patriot Street Fighter. | ||
| We've talked about... | ||
| About the truth hammer? | ||
| Yeah, I think so. | ||
| Oh, God. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| So, also, Mike Adams was a guest on his show back in August, so I guess this dude is another direct connection between Infowars and Project Camelot worlds. | ||
| Unreal. | ||
| Fun! | ||
| Just everywhere. | ||
| Here's a couple of bad signs about his tour. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| The first is that tonight, when this episode comes out, he's speaking at the Farm Boy Garage, which is a car restoration shop. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| This is being billed as a pre-show for the Trump rally, which I'm sure will be spectacular. | ||
| You gotta start small. | ||
| So probably more troubling is that he has dates listed on his website from October 16th to December 15th with specific cities on specific dates, but the venue for all of them is TBD. | ||
| The page says, quote, site has not been determined. | ||
| If you know of potential locations, please go to the contact us page and submit your recommendations. | ||
| This is not how you plan a tour. | ||
| This is not going to go well. | ||
| Just want to let everybody know we'll be doing the Knowledge Fight Theater Tour across the United States. | ||
| We're going to be doing 120 dates next year. | ||
| If you know any theaters and can fill them. | ||
| Or a Jiffy Lube. | ||
| You have a Jiffy Lube? | ||
| You got a Jiffy Lube. | ||
| That'll follow up. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whoa. | |
| Oh, boy. | ||
| I think this is maybe putting the cart before the horse a little bit. | ||
| But it's good that he, instead of finding venues, In advance to promote. | ||
| You promote first. | ||
| Buying an ad on Alex's show. | ||
| You promote first, and then you get the infrastructure. | ||
| Right. | ||
| That's how it's always worked. | ||
| That's how it always will work. | ||
| I've been in the entertainment business for a long time. | ||
| And I love that Alex is willing to promote it. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Like a tour that may legit not happen. | ||
| Like some of these dates might not happen. | ||
| Or they might happen in a park. | ||
| I promoted my first appearance, and I remember this. | ||
| I remember promoting the first time I was going to be on CYSK. | ||
| And it was about eight months into when I started doing stand-up. | ||
| And then about six years later, I did it. | ||
| I promoted the shit out of it, and then six years later it happened. | ||
| That's the way it works. | ||
| Yeah, it's like magic. | ||
| I know that sometimes... | ||
| You know, this happens in independent touring. | ||
| You know, like, maybe you have nine out of ten dates. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| You have a venue, and you're like, well, we'll be between these two cities. | ||
| If we can fit in another date there, we'd like to hit this other city. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| That happens sometimes. | ||
| But this is two months of no venues. | ||
| Hey, if you've got ten dates... | ||
| And then all of a sudden one of your venues drops out, they double booked, they couldn't do something, anything along those, something else came up. | ||
| That's not this. | ||
| TBD. | ||
| This is, I'm going to your city and I'm going to start talking somewhere. | ||
| Somewhere. | ||
| Somewhere. | ||
| Bakery? | ||
| Don't care. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| It's fine. | ||
| Starbucks? | ||
| They won't let me in anymore. | ||
| I'm banned. | ||
| The globalists. | ||
| Truth hammer. | ||
| So, Dan gets distracted by a weird commercial on Alex's show portion. | ||
| I like it. | ||
| So now we get back, and it turns out Facebook is down. | ||
| Oh, no. | ||
| Okay, obviously this started happening about an hour ago. | ||
| Facebook is down along with Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger, and Oculus VR. | ||
| And usually that's when they're doing some backdoor criminal update. | ||
| That's all an arm of the NSA, the globalist-controlled NSA. | ||
| They're claiming it's outages. | ||
| They're all just preparing and testing their internet kill switches where only they'll be online. | ||
| Everybody else will be offline, is what I believe is going on there. | ||
| I figured that out real quick. | ||
| Yep. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That was fast. | |
| Yeah. | ||
| Almost like you just made it up. | ||
| Made it up on the spot. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| Maybe you just heard and then made it up. | ||
| Oh, Facebook's down? | ||
| Great. | ||
| I know what to say about that. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| This one I've been waiting for. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So Alex completely whiffs on this one in a spectacular fashion. | ||
| So what's going on is Biden had made some comments about protesters following Sinema. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| And Alex is trying to sort of defend Sinema and also attack Biden in this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, boy. | |
| And this is just... | ||
| Incoherent? | ||
| A little bit, but it's more embarrassing. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So here's Biden defending it. | ||
| And look, you could say, hey, this is just people pissed off, and that's something that's up to the line, but it's civil disobedience, and it's people being a little bit noisy, and it should be protected. | ||
| But the Democrats, though, when conservatives do it, they want us to arrest it. | ||
| And they defend Antifa when they shoot people in the back. | ||
| So they want to be aggressive and say burning down buildings is mostly peaceful, but then they want to arrest hundreds of people that even go into the U.S. Capitol, like Owen Schroer. | ||
| And now others. | ||
| So here's Joe Biden. | ||
| Mr. President, you're talking about how you have 48 Democratic votes right now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The other two have been pressured over the weekend by activists. | |
| Joe Manchin had people on kayaks show up to his boat. | ||
| Senator Sinema last night was chased into a press room. | ||
| Do you think that those tactics are crossing a line? | ||
| I don't think they're appropriate tactics, but it happens to everybody. | ||
| The only people it doesn't happen to do are people who have Secret Service standing around them. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So it's part of the process. | |
| Is it part of the process to have one of your supporters go shoot a bunch of people or try to kill a bunch of people and shoot Congressman Scalise at the baseball field? | ||
| The CNN defended that. | ||
| That's just embarrassing. | ||
| Yeah, that's sad. | ||
| One thing is, we covered this a hundred times, CNN did not say that the Scalise shooting was a good thing or defended it. | ||
| This is something that Alex has completely fabricated and is just total bullshit. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Also, it's really fun how that dude who did the shooting was a Bernie Sanders supporter literally every time it's come up, but now I guess he was into Biden. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| It's almost like Alex is just making shit up as he goes along. | ||
| It doesn't matter. | ||
| So what happened here is that Alex thought he had a point that he was going to be able to score on Biden. | ||
| He's going to crush it. | ||
| The idea was that Biden was endorsing the protesters following Sinema into a bathroom, which I guess proves Alex's theory that there's different treatment for left and right-leaning protesters, like the right-leaning ones who go into the Capitol and get arrested. | ||
| Oh, no. | ||
| So the clip... | ||
| Alex plays, you know, it doesn't say what Alex said he was saying. | ||
| It's real unfortunate that it doesn't say that. | ||
| Biden explicitly says that he didn't think that those are appropriate tactics. | ||
| Alex set up this clip completely wrong, and it's painfully obvious as it's playing, so in the moment, he has to find a way to shift attention as soon as the clip is over. | ||
| So magically, the guy who shot Scalise is now a Biden supporter. | ||
| This is a rhetorical version of Alex waving a red flag at a bull. | ||
| And I suppose in this metaphor, the bull is the consequences of his lack of preparation. | ||
| Maybe. | ||
| I'm not sure. | ||
| I've lost track of the metaphor. | ||
| Yeah, that one might have skipped your... | ||
| The point is it's a distraction tactic that Alex is engaging in that has no relation to reality. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah, and also, what a weird thing. | ||
| Leave that one alone. | ||
| That's such a weird one to even try and bring up for him. | ||
| I think that... | ||
| Because shouldn't he be fine with it? | ||
| I think that enough people were talking about it and he figured it was a way he could score a point on Biden. | ||
| He probably hadn't watched the clip. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And he just had a sense of it, maybe. | ||
| Probably should have watched it. | ||
| He'd heard a few things and he's like, ah, here's how I'm going to dunk on this in order to weave it into all of my narratives about right-wing aggrievement. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Like, we're oppressed. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Like, these liberal protesters can get away with anything. | ||
| They chase people into bathrooms. | ||
| Man. | ||
| Yeah, and it just doesn't work. | ||
| It's not... | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| It doesn't play. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I mean, I would have been just like... | ||
| I would have assumed he would have gone like, yeah, that's all they're doing and they're all complaining about it. | ||
| That's... | ||
| That's the angle that I would take. | ||
| I also think if you're listening to that clip of Biden, you see a bit of self-effacingness, too. | ||
| He's like, the only time they don't do that is if you have Secret Service around you. | ||
| He's talking about himself. | ||
| Yeah, that's his point. | ||
| He's like, I am not subjected to this kind of thing. | ||
| But the implication is, when I was a senator, I was. | ||
| I was in government for 50 fucking years. | ||
| And not that this is okay. | ||
| It's not a good tactic. | ||
| But it is something that people deal with. | ||
| It would have been more fun if he was like, no, of course I don't support that. | ||
| What should happen is every time she wears clean clothes, somebody throws a bucket of fake blood on her, and then the moment she changes her clothes, boom! | ||
| Another one! | ||
| I think it might be unpresidential. | ||
| Another one! | ||
| So the globalists, they're spreading new viruses around. | ||
| And this is big news for Alex, but there might be something bigger. | ||
| This is the real globalist attack that they intend to hide, claiming a new virus has been released, which they're already claiming new variants are about to come out that are going to kill you. | ||
| Well, yeah, because you're releasing them. | ||
| But first, let me point this out. | ||
| We're having one of the biggest flash sales of our history today. | ||
| And I can tell you, we need funds big time right now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I bet. | |
| Not just to keep this operation on air, but to stay on air and continue on into the future. | ||
| And we need funding now to do this, okay? | ||
| Almost like you had some expenses pop up. | ||
| Yeah, some things that you didn't maybe budget for for this quarter. | ||
| What a dumbass. | ||
| We need money! | ||
| Completely unrelated to those lawsuits that I lost, which are totally unconstitutional. | ||
| I'm sure I'll be able to challenge them in the higher courts. | ||
| Seventh Amendment, baby. | ||
| No big deal. | ||
| Seventh Amendment. | ||
| Anyways, I need a lot of money very quick. | ||
| So much. | ||
| We're having a flash sale. | ||
| I am getting rid of everything because when they lay that judgment down, they're going to liquidate it anyway. | ||
| Listen, I've worn out anybody giving a shit about me saying that there's a money bomb. | ||
| I can't do that again. | ||
| Nope. | ||
| A big flash sale. | ||
| Flash sale. | ||
| Oh, boy. | ||
| So Alex has a guest on. | ||
| This is a guy named Thomas Renz, who's a lawyer, apparently. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| And, yeah, this guy's a weirdo. | ||
| He has some information about COVID that's not good. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And that information showed, and it's incontrovertible, it's straight from the CMS servers, that there are thousands and thousands dying with this vaccine. | |
| 48,000 dead within 14 days of getting the vaccination, which is an important number. | ||
| Because if you're within 14 days, they don't count you as a vaccine death. | ||
| So you're perfectly healthy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You go get the shot. | |
| Three days later, you're dead. | ||
| You're not a vaccine death. | ||
| So 48,000 dead within 14 days. | ||
| I'm not sure this guy knows what within means. | ||
| Because within 14 days includes three days after. | ||
| No. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| That's up. | ||
| In the set of whole numbers between 1 and 14, within... | ||
| Okay. | ||
| The three is there, yes. | ||
| So this is Thomas Renz, who first made these claims in a speech. | ||
| He gave it a Colorado Springs stop on the Reawaken America tour. | ||
| TBD venue. | ||
| No, this one had a venue. | ||
| Well, I was talking about his next stop. | ||
| It was just a who's that of idiots on the panel, with the headliner being General Flynn. | ||
| He also had Stella Emanuel, who we've talked about on the show. | ||
| Patrick Byrne, who's also come up on the show. | ||
| Alex's favorite grocer, Alfie Oaks, gave a speech. | ||
| And what's this? | ||
| Oh, the Q Patriot Street. | ||
| Hey! | ||
|
unidentified
|
There we are! | |
| He was on the bill! | ||
| Of course he was. | ||
| Anyway, Renz hasn't produced the data he's claiming this comes from, and it's all very suspicious. | ||
| The most likely explanation for what's going on is that he's just trying to repackage the old conspiracies about vaccine deaths that people took from VAERS data. | ||
| Going back to July, Renz was serving as the lawyer for America's Frontline Doctors, the wacko group of doctors who love hydroxychloroquine. | ||
| He filed a lawsuit on their behalf against the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, and in that filing he included a section about some alleged whistleblower testimony. | ||
| He had an expert, Jane Doe, who was a computer programmer who had access to Medicare and Medicaid data. | ||
| From the lawsuit, quote, in her expert opinion, VAERS underreported deaths caused by the vaccines by a conservative factor of at least five. | ||
| As of July 9th, 2021, VAERS reported 9048 deaths associated with the vaccines. | ||
| Jane Doe queried all the data from CMS medical claims and has determined that the number of deaths occurred within three days of injection with the vaccines exceeds those reported by VAERS by a factor of at least five, indicating that the true number of deaths caused by the vaccines is at least 45,000. | ||
| At this point, there was this 45,000 figure, which was based on an anonymous expert witness who was guessing that you can multiply the VAERS data by five to get the true vaccine death numbers. | ||
| This is absolute garbage, and it means nothing. | ||
| She didn't get to this conclusion by way of data or death records. | ||
| She was just guessing and multiplying, and then Renz put that into his lawsuit. | ||
| I'm not impressed by any of this, and it's clearly him trying to just sort of redo the same hustle. | ||
| This new intel that he's bringing about is based on whistleblower information. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. | ||
| You just found a grift and he's going with it. | ||
| He's running with it full steam and good for him. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, you know, you can't say that the headliner of that bill is doing anything different than that. | ||
| I mean, it's basically the same shit. | ||
| Nope. | ||
| Some random person sends him some random bullshit and they grift off of it until they can't. | ||
| You passed the bar a couple months ago and you're like, hey, holy shit, here's a career. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I'll make my career by being this guy. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| And it works. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There will never be any negative consequences in the future! | |
| So it turns out he's got some other whistleblower documents that show that if you get vaccinated, you're more likely to get COVID. | ||
| That doesn't make sense. | ||
| Holy shit. | ||
| That's observably false. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If you look at the last few slides, I'm going to read you this. | |
| This is a direct quote from... | ||
| From one of the application for licensure for a booster for the Comunarity. | ||
| This is an exact quote from that document. | ||
| So this is an FDA document from Pfizer, right? | ||
| Pfizer says, an additional analysis appears to indicate that the incidence of COVID-19 generally increased in each group of study participants. | ||
| With increasing time post-dose 2. Well, so does that mean that you've got an increased likelihood of getting COVID after this shot? | ||
| Sounds like it. | ||
| Are you asking me? | ||
| It's supposed to be your information. | ||
| I found this presentation on his website. | ||
| He has the slides up, and it's really funny. | ||
| The first slide is so fucking cocky. | ||
| Quote, Fact checkers, please post all apologies for misleading the American public on Facebook and Twitter. | ||
| Oh my god. | ||
| They will be censored shortly thereafter and you can join the rest of us in social media jail. | ||
| At no point in time... | ||
| Look, if there's anything that we should hammer into first graders, this is the... | ||
| Before we get to arithmetic... | ||
| The definition of and ways to avoid hubris. | ||
| That is all we need to start with. | ||
| That's a fundament of education. | ||
| Avoid hubris. | ||
| The story of Icarus is relevant. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| So I scrolled down to the page that Ranz is talking about, and it's apparently an FDA briefing document from the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting from September 17th, 2021. | ||
| This page on his presentation, it includes the heading of it and then a random paragraph from the document. | ||
| This is an easily accessible document. | ||
| You can find the whole thing. | ||
| You do not need a whistleblower to get to it. | ||
| In fact, I found it, and what's going on is that the line that he read there is being taken completely out of context. | ||
| That's not surprising. | ||
| It does say that, quote, Right. | ||
| That is true. | ||
| Gotcha. | ||
| Because Renz's PowerPoint presentation just chops this paragraph out of the text, you wouldn't know what this is referring to or even what's being analyzed. | ||
| Seems like that would be important information. | ||
| Yeah, it is. | ||
| So this was a study that Pfizer carried out, and it was meant to, quote, compare rates of COVID-19 among participants who completed the two-dose primary series early in the study, i.e., those who were originally randomized into the experimental group, versus those who completed the two-dose primary series later in the study. | ||
| I.e., those who were originally randomized to placebo and then crossed over to the experimental group. | ||
| There is not an unvaccinated group that these people are being compared to. | ||
| The specific point of the study was just to test to see if there is a waning efficacy of the vaccine, and if so, was it something that should be addressed by boosters? | ||
| In the paragraph that Renz uses, they do say that people who got the shot earlier had 70.3 cases per 1,000 person years, compared to 51.6 cases for the group that was vaccinated more recently in the same 1,000 person years. | ||
| That would tend to support Renz's argument, or at least imply that vaccine efficacy could drop off a bit. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| However, Renz very clearly intentionally ignored the next paragraph. | ||
| Quote, in contrast, during the blinded placebo-controlled follow-up period of the study, with data cut off March 13th, 2021, prior to the Delta variant surge, the incidence of COVID-19 among recipients in the evaluable... | ||
| Evaluable efficacy population, nearly 60% of whom had four months or more of blinded follow-up post-dose 2, was 12.6 cases per 1,000 person-years. | ||
| This observation suggests that while waning immunity is one potential factor that may have contributed to the higher incidence breakthrough cases during the Delta variant surge, it's possible that other factors, e.g. | ||
| dynamics of the Delta variant transmission and potential differences in vaccine effectiveness against the Delta variant, Right. | ||
| saying that the vaccine will make you more likely to get COVID. | ||
| The part that Rents is using is saying that one data set showed some indications that people who got vaccinated more recently may have better protection than those people who were vaccinated longer ago. | ||
| But there's also data that seems to indicate that that conclusion might not be so certain and other vectors could be involved. | ||
| And he just ignores that paragraph. | ||
| Anyway, Thomas Renz is just cherry-picking bullshit and pretending credible whistleblowers are involved and he's rightly figured out all this stuff. | ||
| The only thing that he's figured out is that there's a lot of money to be made in being a lawyer for these right-wing shitheads. | ||
| And good. | ||
| Just keep doing it, dude. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, in this situation, this is one of those, like, do you not know how to read? | ||
| Do you not know how to read and comprehend? | ||
| Or are you reading, comprehending, and lying to people? | ||
| And it's like, if you pass the bar, even on your fifth try, you can read and comprehend. | ||
| Yeah, you'd think. | ||
| Or you memorize the answers to the questions. | ||
| Yeah, it does tend to, I mean, all the surrounding context would lead somebody to a reasonable conclusion that he's intentionally ignoring the other part. | ||
| And the context that... | ||
| It's important. | ||
| It does seem like their entire job is turning something... | ||
| And going, God, look at this! | ||
| This is so unreasonable! | ||
| A reasonable person would never allow this to happen! | ||
| And then not going, well, there is a reason for it. | ||
| And a bunch of reasonable people... | ||
| Came up with it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| So, also, this guy apparently was the guy who found the AI document that Mike Adams was reporting on. | ||
| He's busy. | ||
| Yeah, so he's doing a lot of work. | ||
| Yeah, he's got it all. | ||
| So, anyway, he also seems to think that there's something going on and the American institutions are under attack. | ||
| Sure. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, meanwhile, you look across our nation at all the other institutions that are, you know, bedrock institutions of our nation, we're under attack. | |
| Sir, I had a court do default judgments on me when I gave them everything, and they assigned a new judge, and at the second hearing they just said default, and all of the news it says I've lost, and then I don't get the Seventh Amendment. | ||
| I'm just telling you, it's not just me. | ||
| It's on every front the bedrock is being removed. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, yeah, it really is, and I'm going to tell you, Alex, we want to be peaceful. | |
| We want to do this the right way, but if we don't stand now, We're not going to be able to stand later. | ||
| You know, once you've lost freedom, you've lost it. | ||
| It's not coming back. | ||
| Just say you want to kill people. | ||
| Jesus Christ. | ||
| Hey, we want to do this peacefully, but if we don't stand now, then we won't be able to stand later. | ||
| So the obvious distinction that I'm making is we should be violent now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| So anyway, I listened to this. | ||
| I checked in on some of these documents. | ||
| I found some... | ||
| Suspicious presentation issues. | ||
| And that's why this next clip is really funny. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I also have a bunch more information that I'm going to be breaking here coming up as soon as I can get it all analyzed. | |
| We always double-check our work before we say anything because we can't afford to lose our credibility. | ||
| Oh, that's gonna be tough. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Just wow. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Just wow. | ||
| I can't afford to lose my credibility, so I'm gonna go talk to Alex Jones. | ||
| See, this is the thing. | ||
| This is why I can never be in charge, because this type of shit, this is cartoonish, and it requires cartoon-based solutions. | ||
| Like, this is when, if somebody does that, in my government, we drop an anvil on your head. | ||
| Or a piano that's hoisted. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| This is a cartoon. | ||
| There's no reason to treat you like you're a real person. | ||
| Meringue-based solutions. | ||
| Yes, this is ridiculous. | ||
| How dare you? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| You're a clown. | ||
| So anyway, these documents... | ||
| And I'm a clown! | ||
| That's coming from a clown! | ||
| So these documents that Renz has... | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| They're just some of the documents that Alex has. | ||
| And these are the reasons that he is under attack. | ||
| And that's why you need to give him some fucking money. | ||
| Of course they're trying to take us off the air. | ||
| And for what you see on the news with them saying, oh, Jones will be shut down, Jones will have all these judgments, Jones will have all that, on and on and on, that's not going to be the case, ladies and gentlemen, if you support us and spread the word about the articles and the videos and pray for us and have other talk show hosts rally behind us and other folks on Twitter, because Facebook and all that's down right now. | ||
| And support us and say, hey, see what you're not supposed to see. | ||
| Hear what you're supposed to hear. | ||
| Hear the verboten person that's under constant demonization, constant attack. | ||
| Why do the globalists fear him so much? | ||
| Because I'm covering their own documents. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| So, yeah. | ||
| I gotta say, like, I know it's probably obvious, but his, like, financial stuff is acute in this episode. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| It's excessive. | ||
| He's very, very worried. | ||
| Very much so. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| So he has, for the third hour on Monday, he has Wayne Allen Root on the show, who's a Trumpy talk show host guy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| Also made a name for himself originally in, like, sports gambling. | ||
| Cool. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| He sucks. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| But he is on because he has apparently written an article. | ||
| And maybe even a full book about the necessity of civil disobedience. | ||
| I think he wants to brand himself something of a Gandhi for the Trump era. | ||
| Jesus Christ. | ||
| I mean, look. | ||
| Nonviolent resistance is not going to get you to the top in today's conservative climate. | ||
| No, but at the same time, a lot of this is just him. | ||
| Kind of discovering elementary ideas about organization. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh. | |
| And, like, grassroots activism. | ||
| All the stuff that conservatives have kind of hid from him all these years, he's suddenly discovering. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Uh-huh. | |
| Well, first of all, in the book I list, the whole book is about one way of attacking, which is the way Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton have done it for the last four decades. | ||
| They intimidate corporate America. | ||
| I'm a believer, Alex, that nothing happens from the politicians. | ||
| They're a bunch of nobodies, right? | ||
| The money is what allows them to be important and to make policy and to ruin our country. | ||
| And by the way, all the politicians, in my opinion, the most important ones are owned by China. | ||
| They're either owned or blackmailed by China. | ||
| So they don't care what we say, even if we are the majority. | ||
| And we've been the silent majority. | ||
| My book, The Great Patriot Protest, a boycott book, is all about making us the loud majority. | ||
| We've got to be loud. | ||
| We've got to tell corporate America that writes all the checks and backs all these politicians and backs all the PACs, not with $10 like you and I give, or $100 or $1,000. | ||
| They write $1 million and $10 million checks. | ||
| So the politicians listen to them, and we've got to bring them to their knees and starve them. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, on an elementary level, putting financial pressure on businesses is... | ||
| An effective organizing strategy. | ||
| But unfortunately, one of the things that he's going to quickly learn is that a lot of these same people that he would like to pressure also fund all of the information space and the politicians that he supports. | ||
| There is that problem. | ||
| Yeah, it's kind of going to end up being shooting yourself in the foot. | ||
| See, now what he doesn't understand, because he can't take it that next step further... | ||
| Is that this is endemic to the entire system. | ||
| And any idea of him being on the right side is quite laughable and silly. | ||
| Yeah, but it's like discovering something that everyone is already aware of for a long time. | ||
| But it's cute. | ||
| You know what? | ||
| The management is really taking advantage of the workers. | ||
| And I just don't think we're being paid well. | ||
| And there's just no way to negotiate them with by myself because they can just fire me at any time. | ||
| I don't have any protections. | ||
| The law doesn't protect me. | ||
| This is a free market system. | ||
| The only way, the only way is if we all come together and do something like withhold something from these corporate power brokers. | ||
| It's, oh, how could we do that? | ||
| There's probably not a way to do it. | ||
| There's just no way. | ||
| Well, actually, Wayne found a way. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| And this is so sad. | ||
| So I went out and I hired a team of telemarketers to dial the 116 most liberal, woke companies in America that survive on our sales. | ||
| We, conservatives, Christians, and patriots, are the ones buying their products, but they're spitting in our face, they're insulting us, they're offending us, they're ignoring us. | ||
| So I identified what I think are the top 116. | ||
| Coca-Cola, AT&T, that owns CNN, Ben& Jerry's. | ||
| The list is long. | ||
| Victoria's Secret. | ||
| And we can bring them to their knees. | ||
| So I had the telemarketers find out with hundreds of phone calls. | ||
| Pushing, pushing, pushing. | ||
| What's the phone number of the CEO? | ||
| What's the email for the CEO? | ||
| What's the social media accounts? | ||
| What's the websites? | ||
| What is the physical mailing address? | ||
| And I've got the board of directors' names and the CEO's names. | ||
| So now you just open the book and you dial. | ||
| This implies that it's not as grassroots as he wants to sort of imagine. | ||
| I mean, he had to hire a team of telemarketers to harass people. | ||
| Quite literally, they are paid protesters. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah, this isn't fun. | ||
| This is kind of stupid. | ||
| Also, wasn't there just a recent story about how AT&T... | ||
| AT&T provides 90% of One America News' funding? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah. | ||
| Real woke company. | ||
| Woke as shit, AT&T. | ||
| You know that company that has essentially built a truck? | ||
| And is unwilling to budge on coverage or anything like that because they completely control them. | ||
| So he got these telemarketers. | ||
| So woke. | ||
| And he paid them to find the contact information for CEOs and stuff. | ||
| And he's putting it in his book so you can harass them too. | ||
| You know what? | ||
| I'm fine with that. | ||
| Because one, I think it's hilarious. | ||
| Fine. | ||
| If that's how you get to corporations, by picking the most woke ones, fine. | ||
| You win. | ||
| You got the most woke corporations. | ||
| You're not going to like the outcome of it. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Your political interests are not served by these corporations losing whatever power they have. | ||
| I don't know why you think they're woke or liberal, but whatever it is you need to hate those corporations, I'm fine with it. | ||
| God bless you. | ||
| Yeah, I think that if some kind of quote-unquote Antifa group were finding CEOs of right-leaning companies like Hobby Lobby or whatever and posting their contact information, I think Alex would not enjoy that. | ||
| No, no. | ||
| Also, I think if an Antifa group picked the most right-leaning corporations, it would be the identical fucking list that this asshole has. | ||
| I bet there would be overlap. | ||
| There's significant overlap. | ||
| So, look, Wayne, good on you, I guess. | ||
| I mean, like, if you're posting, like, ways to get in contact with decision makers for corporations, I don't know if that's bad, but if you're putting, like, home addresses or phone numbers or doxing people, I think that that's still maybe, like, I don't know if that's cool. | ||
| I'm not sure what he did. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| It might just be a corporate email address that's in his book. | ||
| Sure, sure, sure, sure. | ||
| But anyway. | ||
| There's a tale of victory that Wayne has that is the saddest fucking thing I've ever heard. | ||
| And just one person that bought my book, one, on the first day he came out, sent me an email and said, Wayne, I sent an email to the head of Nordstrom's, the head of Costco, and the head of AT&T. | ||
| And all three answered back and said, why are you boycotting? | ||
| Don't do this to us. | ||
| What can I do to make you happy? | ||
| That was one. | ||
| Can you imagine if we got 100,000 or a million patriots to do this every day? | ||
| Five minutes a day, send three out. | ||
| Tomorrow, a new three. | ||
| The next day, a new three. | ||
| I totally agree. | ||
| Wayne, Wayne, stay there. | ||
| We're going to come back and talk about this all. | ||
| This guy got, like, customer service emails. | ||
| I've just discovered something! | ||
| It's called spam email! | ||
| And it's how we're going to take this country back! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Huh. | |
| There's no way they'll figure out how to organize their inbox. | ||
| Here I am, the CEO of Costco. | ||
| I got 100,000 emails saying the people were going to boycott us, but our numbers are unaffected. | ||
| I'll ignore these emails. | ||
| Oh, no. | ||
| Oh, no. | ||
| Our sales are up 2% in this quarter. | ||
| Or maybe whenever these emails come in, hit them with a form response. | ||
| Oh, no. | ||
| I'm so sorry. | ||
| Oh, my God. | ||
| Not an email campaign. | ||
| Oh, boy. | ||
| You know, I was just thinking about that women's march. | ||
| You know, the two million just walking through the streets and how effective that was. | ||
| But, man. | ||
| That did everything. | ||
| I can't believe what would have happened if they had run an email campaign. | ||
| I can't count the number of times where I've had something that didn't get delivered or something. | ||
| I ordered a frame from Wayfair, and it didn't come. | ||
| All you got with that was that little kid. | ||
| Yeah, I sent an email about how this sucks. | ||
| I got a response. | ||
| And they were like, I'm so sorry. | ||
| They're going to change their corporate policies. | ||
| The whole thing. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Everything. | ||
| They are going to pay their workers more. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Stop sending kids in their furniture. | ||
| That one they did a little while ago. | ||
| Quietly. | ||
| So, we have one last clip here of Wayne. | ||
| And this is not good. | ||
| And I'm telling you, I'm not the most religious person in the entire world, but I do believe this is the devil. | ||
| Rules for Radicals is their Bible, the left, and it's dedicated to Lucifer. | ||
| And it's not a coincidence that Joe Biden the other day said, well, we haven't passed my agenda yet, my $3.5 trillion bill. | ||
| If it takes six days, six weeks, or six months, we'll pass it. | ||
| Six, six, six. | ||
| Why did he say it that way? | ||
| Pure chance? | ||
| No, they're sending out codes. | ||
| Yeah, man, they're sending out devil codes. | ||
| There's nothing I can do for you, sir. | ||
| Nope. | ||
| Sir, I'm gonna have to ask you to leave. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why did he say six days, six weeks, six months? | |
| Well, it's the devil. | ||
| It's the devil. | ||
| It's obviously the devil. | ||
| Can't be anything other than the devil. | ||
| Oh, boy. | ||
| Oh, my God. | ||
| So, you know, we see this period of response, and, you know, obviously Alex is in not good mood about the cases. | ||
| He could use some money. | ||
| He's desperately trying to fundraise. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I mean, it's hilariously transparent. | ||
| Yeah, this is bad. | ||
| But he hasn't, you know, on these episodes, he hasn't reached a point yet where it would be like losing his shit. | ||
| Right. | ||
| You know? | ||
| Right, right, right. | ||
| And I still think that may be on the horizon. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, if I'm listening to this, even for an InfoWars listener, I am absorbing some of this news and I'm just going, this ship. | ||
| Is sinking. | ||
| And every time he says he needs money to fight the globalists, all I hear is another bucket of water going on that ship. | ||
| If you're a fan, even like, how do you not hear this and be like, oh, he's saying he really, really needs money. | ||
| He just ended up being on the hook for a lot of money in those lawsuits. | ||
| Do you think that's connected? | ||
| I don't know if he's trying to expand, frankly. | ||
| And I'm going to search my memory real quick. | ||
| His last expansion was Corsi in DC. | ||
| Well, no, because he also did that, like, firepower show that got canceled. | ||
| Right, right, right, right. | ||
| Yeah, not good. | ||
| Not a good track record. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh. | |
| Ooh, what about that show that was all callers that he's going to start? | ||
| Oh, with Old Man Housephone? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Co-hosting? | ||
| Yeah, what about that show that's been on the back burner for five years? | ||
| Anytime now. | ||
| Anytime now. | ||
| Oh my god. | ||
| Harrison Smith, he's going to do all calls. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I remember that. | |
| Yep. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That went well. | |
| Fired David Knight. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| Where's Steve? | ||
| I know. | ||
| I was kind of hoping for a Steve conspiracy about the lawsuits. | ||
| Well, maybe it'll come in the future. | ||
| But we'll track some other days after this on Monday's episode. | ||
| But, you know, it'll just be too much to bite off all at once. | ||
| Oh, yeah. | ||
| But we'll be back for that. | ||
| Until then, we have a website. | ||
| We do. | ||
| It's knowledgefight.com. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| We also are on Twitter. | ||
| We are. | ||
| It's at knowledge underscore fight and at GoToBedJordan. | ||
| And? | ||
| And? | ||
| You just launched an Instagram for the show. | ||
| Oh, I did launch an Instagram! | ||
| We're knowledge underscore fight on Instagram? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Indeed? | ||
| We decided we gotta promote a little bit. | ||
| Well, I think we just decided that we should put our cat pictures somewhere. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Promote is a very generous... | ||
| We've got to get with it in terms of... | ||
| Everybody wants to see the Celine pics. | ||
| Eight years from now, we're going to get on TikTok. | ||
| I don't know if that's ever going to happen for us. | ||
| Probably not. | ||
| Anyway, we'll be back. | ||
| But until then, I'm Neo, I'm Leo, I'm DZX Clark, I'm Daryl Rundis. | ||
| And now here comes the sex robots. | ||
| Andy in Kansas, you're on the air. | ||
| Thanks for holding. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hello, Alex. | |
| I'm a first-time caller. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm a huge fan. | |
| I love your work. |
Export Selection