Today, Dan and Jordan take a little jaunt back to the past. In this installment, Alex freestyles a bunch of incorrect facts, lies about Porton Down, and warns that special education classes are a plot to kidnap children. Citations
And then the really dangerous thing, the thing that I think is the greatest threat, and they mentioned a bunch of other things in this article that we'll get into later in the next segment, is genetic-engineered pathogens getting turned loose.
And we know that Horton Down Bioweapons Lab over in the United Kingdom in Wiltshire produces and has Level 4 status and is underground.
It has three rings of barbed wire around it in minefields, but that didn't stop four years ago from someone releasing weaponized foot and mouth.
Of course, two months before it showed up in over a dozen locations simultaneously, that's not how natural outbreaks behave.
They don't show up in Scotland and Wales and Northern Ireland in the same week by accident.
But to go back, the Port and Down Bioweapons Lab had contacted the different counties in the United Kingdom and told them, prepare masses of pyre, prepare masses of wood.
They don't have a lot of woods in England.
I remember it was a very expensive undertaking, the article said.
They masked all these pyres.
They said, prepare for some type of large outbreak, perhaps foot and mouth.
Then suddenly foot and mouth showed up, and Port and Down said, we think an animal rights activist...
Yeah, we talked about this foot-and-mouth issue in a previous 2003 episode, so I'm not going to repeat all that stuff here, but there's one detail in that telling of the story that I've not heard Alex include in the narrative in the past.
We talked about what the reality of that is on a previous episode.
That was like the Ministry of Agriculture, they do that every year.
They call and say, hey, are you prepared for possible sick animals?
So there's a real problem with the chain of events that Alex is expressing that's immediately apparent, which is that an animal rights activist supposedly went on a bizarre, almost certainly impossible mission of stealing this virus just so they could release it and kill animals in the name of protecting animal rights.
So Portentown never said that an animal rights activist had released the foot and mouth.
This is what the Guardian refers to as a, quote, rural myth.
And here's the basic story.
There's an animal sanctuary called the Hillside, which is home to over 800 rescued animals from farms.
Some representatives from the Hillside visited a farm called Burnside Farm, which happened to be one of the main farms where animals came down with foot and mouth.
They were not the only ones to visit, though.
There was an inspection by the Ministry of Agriculture having received multiple complaints about the conditions that animals were kept on on the farm.
After the foot-and-mouth outbreak began, the folks at Burnside leveled accusations at Hillside Sanctuary workers of having been the source of the outbreak, but that's pretty much impossible.
The Hillside folks came to the farm in December 2000, and the outbreak occurred in February 2001.
In January 2001, the Ministry of Agriculture did their inspection and said, quote, there were positively no traces of foot-and-mouth in the pigs in the farm.
For their part, a spokesman at Porton Down actually said, quote, we have never worked on foot and mouth.
Alex is creating a fake way to present this rural rumor as if it were the actual response of the people at Porton Down.
Any critical thinkers listening to his show should be asking themselves why he would do that.
Certainly, one possibility is that Alex just doesn't know anything and he's mixing up rural rumors with official statements from Porton Down.
He could be that stupid, and if so, I would say he's probably not someone who should be taken seriously.
On the other hand, another possibility is that Alex knows exactly what he's doing.
If Porton Down had claimed that an animal rights activist stole the virus, that solidifies multiple things about his narrative that he can't solidify any other way.
The first is that Foot and Mouth originated at Port and Down.
Without this fake admission, Alex can't demonstrate this at all.
The second thing is that if this is really, truly the response that Port and Down had, there's still a bad guy.
This story still has a villain that you can point to and scapegoat.
And that second thing is super important, because as often is the case...
In 2007, the UK government released a final report on the foot and mouth outbreak, and while they were unable to come to a definitive conclusion about where it started, they have a pretty good idea.
There were two labs that were right next to each other, IAH and Mariel, which were, they actually were doing work on foot and mouth at the time.
From the report, quote, "There had been concern for several years that the effluent pipes were old and needed replacing, but after much discussion, money had not been made available." Alex's narrative conveniently sidesteps the actual answer to these problems, which is regulation that people actually follow, regular inspections, and government spending.
By turning it into a story where evil animal rights activists stole the virus, Alex doesn't have to worry about that accidentally penetrating his world, because he doesn't have a good I would love to no longer, like...
Yeah, so what they theorized is that there's a number of people who are, you know, going in and out through, like, construction work and maintenance work, and somehow this transferred to the farm.
Jane's weapons publications out of England, the world leader in tracking military technology, hardly ever puts out alerts.
They may put out one a year.
And just a few months ago, they put out an alert about...
Race-specific viruses and bacteria, race-specific pathogens, and they said the U.S., the United Kingdom, and Israel have been known to develop race-specific bioweapons, and that's what they're...
So, Jane's is a magazine that uses publicly available information to discuss weapons and military projects.
I wasn't able to find anything suggesting this or matching what Alex is saying in Jane's archives, but I was able to find a similar discussion from an article published in the American Free Press.
In case you forgot, American Free Press is that publication founded by Willis Cardo, noted white supremacist and Nazi.
Anyway, this article uses anonymous sources to claim that there's a lab at Porton Down working on race-specific bio-weapons.
I find myself less than convinced by this sourcing.
It would be wise to hide that you got it from the white nationalist magazine that you totally don't read because you're definitely above that whole thing.
It's actually a 7,000-acre science park with a bunch of labs on it.
The lab that Alex is talking about is on the grounds, but it's actually called the Defense Science and Technology Laboratory, or DISTAL.
The lab is owned and funded by the UK government, primarily the Ministry of Defence.
There are other government-funded entities also that are housed in the Science Park, like Plowshare Innovations and Public Health England.
The area also includes Tetricus Science Park, which is within the Porton Down, which is home to GWE Business West and New Serum Enterprises.
I guess it's possible that there's some lab that's within the area of the Science Park that's owned by a company that's a subsidiary of Carlyle Group, but that's not what Alex is suggesting here.
The name Porton Down to him means a specific lab, and that lab is the Defense Science and Technology Laboratory, which is definitely not owned by the Carlyle Group.
Cannibalism is increasing in North Korea following another poor harvest and a big cut in international food aid, according to refugees who have fled the stricken country.
And each of these times marked the aftermath of a large and devastating famine involving almost certainly a combination of poor civic management and crops being destroyed by natural disasters.
Also, Alex would do anything to be able to vote for Donald Trump Jr. right now, and he would welcome that hereditary dictatorship, no questions asked.
Also, just real quick, I'm not saying that any of what I'm about to talk about is okay, but Kim Jong-il didn't kill the movie stars that he kidnapped.
That's just something Alex is making up.
This had to do with Shin Sank Ok and Choi Eun Hee, who were formerly a married couple.
Shin was a movie director and Choi was an actress.
They were kidnapped in 1978 and taken to North Korea, where they were forced to make movies with the objective of heightening North Korea's profile in the field of arts.
So in 1986, they escaped while on a trip to Vienna, because they were able to evade their handlers and they made it to the U.S. Embassy.
Shin and Choi would get remarried and live in the United States for about 10 years before going back to South Korea.
Shin passed away in 2006, and Choi just died in 2018 at the age of 91. Alex is mixing up this story with Kim Jong-il apologizing to Japan for abducting 12 Japanese nationals during the 70s and 80s, eight of whom were dead as of 2002, according to The Guardian.
These were just random Japanese citizens who were kidnapped in Japan by North Korean special forces then taken to live in North Korea.
Kim Jong-il said, quote, the special forces were carried away by a reckless quest for glory.
It was regretful, and I want to frankly apologize.
I've taken steps to ensure that it will not happen again.
If I'm to understand what Kim Jong-il is apologizing for, he's saying that there were these rogue North Korean special forces trying to get glory by kidnapping random Japanese people and making them live in North Korea.
So he explained that they were abducted so they could teach spies Japanese and so that their identities could be used to enter South Korea.
Almost certainly if Kim Jong-il is admitting to abducting 12 Japanese people, that number might be a little bit higher.
There are also some suspicions that the eight people who were abducted and who died were killed to cover up the abductions, but that's not something that's been definitively proven.
It's obviously possible, but I'm not sure.
Anyway, this story is really fucked up, and I'm not going to bat for Kim Jong-il, but it's important to recognize that Alex has no idea what he's talking about.
He's just randomly mixing together details from various stories to create the kind of composite image that he wants his audience to have.
You know, fine.
Mix all this stuff up.
But Alex is pretending to be a show that traffics in information, which he is short on, and he's mixing up entirely.
You have no idea about what was going on if you took him at face value.
Yeah, and he's also somehow turning it into a left-right issue, which, again, he is above 100%, despite the fact that everybody on the left is evil and this liberal viewpoint is wrong.
The liberal viewpoint is that famine is causing or contributing to people possibly being driven to cannibalism, whereas Alex's view on it, which is the correct view, conservative view, is that Kim Jong-il is bad.
When you die in a death camp, the police, the jail guards, the work camp guards sell you.
And the number one product is opium.
And they sell that, of course, U.S. government ships pull up, pick up the OPM, bring it back here for your children to inject and become whores in the system, you know, to become prostitutes.
So this is a good example of what Alex does instead of covering the actual stories that he's pretending to cover.
He'll just grab a headline and riff on it, going with whatever sparks some kind of anger in his mind.
So a quick point about this opium thing.
A 2006 Senate committee meeting was held on the, quote, illicit activity funding the regime in North Korea.
One of the witnesses called was Peter A. Prahar, the Director, Office of Asia, Africa, and Europe Programs Bureau of the International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, which is a part of the U.S. Department of State.
Senator Coburn asked, quote, is there enough information to put North Korea under the drug majors category?
Prahar replied, quote, No, sir.
That is another item that we consider on a regular basis within the Department of State.
As you know, a country can be put on the majors list for basically two reasons.
First of all, it is producing 1,000 hecaters or cultivating 1,000 hecaters or more of poppy, opium poppy, or coca.
We have been unable to confirm reports that we have received over time that there is significant opium poppy cultivation in North Korea, so we've been unable to consider North Korea for placement on the majors list.
It's not inconceivable that the North Korean government makes some money through illegal drug sales, but that's a little different than acting like the opium and heroin here in the United States came from North Korea.
Yeah, and according to a report put out this year by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, approximately 83% of the world's opium is produced in Afghanistan.
Very little of that actually makes it to U.S. markets, however, and most of the opium that's here originates in Mexico, Colombia, or Guatemala.
At the point Alex is recording this, Afghanistan and Myanmar would be...
Far and away the largest suppliers of opium poppy in the world.
This is just how Alex puts some flair into his news coverage.
He ignores reality and throws something jarring in his audience's face in order to shock them, like saying that North Korea is sending opium to the United States to turn your children into heroin-addicted sex workers.
So, Wardenburg Syndrome is a condition that's quite rare and has a lot more presentations than just different colored eyes.
Based on some other details that this person gives, the diagnosis actually seems plausible since her child also has hearing loss, which is another symptom of Wardenburg.
The eye thing, however, just on its own, is a phenomenon called heterochromia iridem.
And generally speaking, it's not a problem and it doesn't require treatment.
It has nothing to do with the twin in the womb and you can even develop it later in life.
Your eye color is determined by a series of genes that are incredibly complicated, but more or less it boils down to melanin concentration in the tissues of your iris.
Reasons you could have this at birth generally come down to a genetic trait passed on from one of your parents.
It might be as simple as having hyperpigmentation in one eye, or it could be indicative of, you know, there's a couple serious conditions that it could be an indication of.
But if this caller's child was born with one of those more serious conditions, I don't think the eye color would be the most pressing thing to bring up.
I would be fine with that kind of a dumb show, but the problem is that Alex is also perpetuating really dangerous ideas within the same conversation with this lady.
Yeah, it's an incoherent conversation, but I feel like Alex's take is just so irresponsible and so disrespectful to people who are special ed educators and who take a lot of time and care to try and help kids.
And he gets a call from a guy who works at Taco Bell.
And this guy is pretty concerned about technological advancements.
unidentified
I was watching less than a couple weeks ago.
I was watching a thing on the History Channel.
On restaurants, they were talking about the drive-thru windows.
And it caught my eye.
Because they were talking about maybe a next step, and some of the McDonald's restaurants were already doing it, is having the little cards, and they would ask you if you just want to take it off the card while they're out there.
So Alex takes another call, and this fella, I believe, is from the Oklahoma City area, and he heard something on the radio that he wants to run by, Alex.
I know that a talk show host named Lan Lampierre, I've been on his show about five times and we've called for it, and it's one of the big 50,000 waters there, AM.
In that clip, Alex was basically trying to take credit for some alleged resolution being discussed at the Oklahoma City Council that he didn't even know existed before this call.
Also, shouldn't he know about these kinds of things?
Like, half of his show is just yelling about the Patriot Act, so you would think that he would keep himself up to date on what would be major news on that front.
So he hears the name Dewey, and he knows that there's a thing called the Dewey Decimal System, so he confidently asserts that they're related.
They aren't.
And I'll talk a little bit about that, but first, I want to explain why Alex does this.
Alex has no idea who John Dewey is, but he can't make that obvious to the audience.
If this caller is mentioning Dewey in relation to the early globalists back in the 1920s, then Alex should be an expert on this guy.
By just interjecting Dewey Decimal System, Alex is trying to feign expertise, because it's meant to look like him saying, of course I know about John Dewey.
He was also kicked out of the American Library Association, which he founded because he wouldn't stop sexually harassing women, including his daughter-in-law.
It's just nuts to think that this guy was so out of line that he would get in trouble for making unwelcome advances to women in the early 1900s, a time when that sort of thing was...
He was such a bigot that, according to an article in the American Libraries magazine, quote, Dewey bought up the adjoining land for fear it would otherwise be sold to Jews.
So, conversely, John Dewey was a psychologist and an educator who spent some time in China in the 1920s.
He has nothing to do with libraries and library science.
Alex is just making up whatever information makes him look smart in the moment, because he's comfortable in the knowledge that a podcast pointing this stuff out and laughing at it wouldn't exist for another 18 years.
Yeah, I think if you are a literature major like myself, You're eventually going to have to wrestle with the fact that just about everybody who wrote a good book is a giant piece of shit.
So the reason that folks in Iraq needed to print Saddam banknotes is because the public had, quote, lost confidence in the only other banknote in wide circulation.
By October 2003, a new dinar had been introduced with anti-fraud measures in place to provide a unified currency without Saddam's face on it.
This was just the least bad solution to the problem.
As an article in the BBC puts it, U.S. and British officials have said it's better to lose face by printing 250 dinar notes with Saddam on them for a short period than risk further inflaming public anger.
The Ba'ath Party is not in power at this point, and in fact, just 14 days before this episode was recorded, the active elements of de-Ba'athification had entered into force in Iraq.
Now, coalition forces were responsible for trying to determine who was a member of the Ba'ath Party so that they could be banned from holding any job in the public sphere.
It's really fucked up.
Like, this super destructive process is going on, and the way Alex is covering it could not be more detached from reality.