Jordan Holmes and Dan Friesen dissect Alex Jones’s September 7, 2021 episode, where he baselessly ties COVID-19 to demonic possession, cloning (citing Genesis 6 and Microsoft patents), and a UN "Satanist" plot—despite earlier dismissing the virus as a hoax. They mock his reliance on fringe sources like Zero Hedge, supernatural claims (e.g., "interdimensional Satan"), and commercial interruptions, while critiquing his irresponsible COVID misinformation, including promoting unproven treatments like hydroxychloroquine. The episode highlights Jones’s pattern of sensationalism over substance, raising concerns about dehumanizing conspiracy theories and their real-world harm. [Automatically generated summary]
But yeah, so Taskmaster is another British panel game show, but the conceit behind it is this guy gets a bunch of comics and he gives them this very open-ended task, like open this thing or whatever.
And then they have to do it in an interesting and creative way.
And the combination of like different personalities that they get every time ensures that there will be creative solutions that are like out of left field.
And also there'll be solutions where somebody's like, okay, and in two seconds just smashes it with a fucking hammer.
That means that they're going to, in the game, look, as a former dungeon master myself, that means in the game, something from the past is going to come up and there's going to be an exciting new scenario for them to play out.
But the mainstream media loves to get the parts where I blow up and yell and scream.
And it's entertaining, but they love to try to pigeonhole us as being maniacs.
But, you know, it was Barry Goldwater, famous maniac.
Last century, the main people that fought the New World Order and helped build the movement we have today that Ron Paul and Donald Trump and others stood on top of, and myself as well on his shoulders that said extremism in defense of liberty is no vice.
Most importantly, though, just because Barry Goldwater said something, that doesn't make it true.
It's a well-written sentence because it was written by a speechwriter, but that doesn't mean that it expresses an accurate point.
It's really just a pithy way of saying, like, if you bomb something for a good reason and you also kind of seem to enjoy bombing things, then you shouldn't be judged just because you secretly enjoy bombing things.
Quote, the culture of the far left America was displayed in a startling way during the Super Bowl's now infamous halftime show, a show brought to us on behalf of Value Less Moonvest and the pagan temple of Viacom Babylon.
He swore that he wasn't just talking about a titty, going on to say, quote, wouldn't you expect a bumping, humping, trashy routine entitled, I'm Gonna Get You Naked to End That Way?
I would quote you some of it, but the sergeant-at-arms would throw me out of this chamber, as well he should.
Then there was that prancing, dancing, strutting, rudding guy, evidently suffering from jock itch because he kept yelling and grabbing his crotch.
But then maybe there's a culture of crotch grabbing in this country I don't know about.
But as bad as all that was, the thing that yanked my chain the hardest was seeing this ignoramus with his pointed head sticking up through a hole that he had cut in the flag of the United States of America, screaming about having a bottle of scotch and wanting lots of crotch.
You might be confused about what he was actually speaking about because he doesn't get to that point until later on.
Quote, the desire and will of this Congress to meaningfully do anything about any of these so-called social issues is non-existent and embarrassingly disgraceful.
The American people are waiting and growing impatient with us.
They want something done.
I'm pleased to be a co-sponsor of SJ Resolution 26.
The quote itself sounds really good when you isolate it, but you know, because it's not hard to agree with the point that sometimes being silent is the equivalent of being cowardly.
Alex has got the speaker wrong for the quote, and the quote itself is a ridiculous piece of Zell Miller's very, very dumb speech where he was mad about the Super Bowl halftime show, and thus gay people can't get married.
Let the record show Jordan is making the jerk off motion, and he has seated his floor would like to remind the good senator from Jordan that neighbors.
Well, I understand how it seems like I'm just nitpicking things Alex says that he's wrong about, but I need to stress that this is part of demonstrating a pattern.
Alex doesn't know anything.
He's just repeating things he's heard as if they're the product of actual investigation or some sort of knowledge on his part.
And he's just hoping that you, as a listener, will be fooled into accepting his confident words as truth when they're not.
In this specific case, he's just imagined that the term yellowbelly comes from soldiers who pissed on themselves in war because that's something he's decided cowards do, and yellow belly is a term that means coward.
They can't really trace it down to like a direct route.
There's a derogatory usage of the term yellow bellies from England in the late 1700s to refer to people from the fens, which is an area around the coastal east of the country.
And then there are some people who suggest that the root of the term has to do with the days when doctors believed that medical issues were all traced back to the humors.
That is that soldiers pee on themselves, and that's where it comes from.
Yep.
He just made it up as he was talking.
Yeah.
It's kind of astonishing that he could really say that out loud with no context or even background for it and just go with it in such a confident manner.
So he realizes that in his metaphor, by ordering those 20 plates, he has ensured that he cannot consume all of the food on any of those plates, thus making the metaphor him not being able to consume the information that he's ostensibly going to regurgitate towards us.
But let me just do this before I drill into the top stories.
Let me just give you some big announcements.
Major journalistic organizations will get into the intercept and others.
Did Fourier request Fauci and gain of function research at Wuhan and Chapel Hill, North Carolina and USA and China.
And it's hundreds of pages of Fauci directing chimeric merger of five viruses into a COVID-SARS virus to then, quote, make a super vaccine for something that didn't exist in the entire evolutionary system of this planet.
They've got a Freedom of Information Act request going against the National Institutes of Health.
And as part of that, they released two really long grant contracts between the NIH and EcoHealth Alliance involving coronavirus-related work, some of which did involve the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Alex is saying that it's hundreds of pages, but that's because one grant is 528 pages long and the other is 386.
These are long-ass documents.
And one of the problems that comes from using a document like this as evidence of your conspiracy is that they're super granular in terms of detail.
For instance, on page 72 of the first grant, which covered a project that was ongoing from 2014 to 2019, they include a breakdown of expenses related to two doctors who are part of the support team, like for their phone and internet.
This amounts to $47 per month, but it merits a paragraph in this grant proposal.
If you can't find specifics in this document with this many specifics, your conspiracy stinks.
Yeah, but ultimately a lot of it got really technical.
So I called in the help of our friend who's not a health ranger and got a bit of it clarified about what the goals of this project were.
What they were up to was two-pronged.
The first part of the research was to go out and find samples to test for coronaviruses, either ones we've previously identified or new ones.
This would be done by going out to wild bat populations and taking samples from humans who have interactions with wild animal populations and from people who work in and animals at live animal markets.
So they would take these samples and sequence the RNA of the coronaviruses they found in them.
They'd take this RNA to make samples of a cell in a petri dish that would go on to express this virus.
And these were exposed to other cells that were expressing ACE2 receptors.
The reason to do this is because if there were going to be animal to human transmission of any of these viruses, it would most likely happen by way of the ACE2 receptors.
So this was a way to concoct circumstances where they could test whether or not the wild viruses they found would be something that could possibly be transmitted to humans.
And to, I would argue, almost all of the extreme right exploiting this, that is Arthur C. Clarke's magic to a T. You might as well have said, like, they take the virus from space and they put it into a hole and then the hole turns more virus around.
The second part of the research was basically the phylogenic research aspect, where they were trying to trace evolutionary roots of the coronaviruses that they had discovered.
The reason for doing this research is because there are some of these viruses that they find that only infect bats.
And there's some that only infect humans.
And there are some that are in the middle, like more likely to infect humans.
By studying the variations in these viruses, by determining what's different about them between them on an RNA level, these scientists might be able to make some progress in terms of isolating the part of a virus that makes it dangerous to humans.
It's very important research.
You can easily see the reasons that these types of grants would be given and how the things they were aiming to look into were pretty relevant.
The end goal of the grant was not to make a super vaccine.
All that stuff is just stuff Alex has made up, and he's using the specter of this intercept article to lend credibility to his notions, but none of it's real.
And it's not even backed up by the article that he's referencing.
I wholly support journalistic institutions exploring unlikely or even sometimes derided possibilities, and I have no problem at all with people sending FOIA requests to learn more about the research that our government funds.
For instance, like if they were jamming five viruses together into one super coronavirus in order to make a super vaccine, I think it would be good for somebody with a little bit of credibility to dig into it and try and figure out if there's any proof of this.
I take issue with the framing of this article, though.
These grants that they found in their FOIA request are not evidence that should be used as any kind of justification for even slightly shifting closer to accepting the lab leak theory hypothesis.
The hypothesis that the virus could have escaped from a lab accident, which is still way different than Alex's story, that is possible.
But the current weight of evidence leans more towards a natural origin.
On page 38 of the grant proposal, in the section where the participants give their personal statements, one of the researchers said this, quote, my work on SARS coronavirus ecology in collaboration with co-investigators Dasik, Zhang, and Xi, led me to the discovery of several SARS-like coronaviruses and bats, which appear to be ancestral to SARS coronavirus, and most recently, which utilize the same ACE2 receptor as SARS, suggesting direct spillover to humans is possible.
Part of the justification for this grant to be worth funding is that at this point, in 2014, when they're applying for the grant, they'd already discovered previously unknown SARS-like viruses that could hypothetically directly infect humans.
I understand that Alex is insane, but the Intercept should do better in terms of how they frame this story.
The reporting on these grants being released by a FOIA request shouldn't have a headline as vague as, quote, new details emerge about coronavirus research at Chinese lab.
I would allow for this just to be bad, like a clickbait type headline, except that the tone of this article is incredibly suggestive, and they have some questionable sources.
Here's one paragraph.
Quote, this is a roadmap to the high-risk research that could have led to the current pandemic, said Gary Ruskin, executive director of U.S. Right to Know, a group that's been investigating the origins of COVID-19.
That's great, but the way this is written suggests that U.S. Right to Know is an impartial group that's just trying to get to the bottom of this stuff.
It's the voice of clarity on the issue of the origin of COVID.
That's not true.
U.S. Right to Know is largely funded by the Organic Consumers Association, which is a naturopathic kind of outlet that doesn't seem to like mainstream medicine all that much.
They have a post on their website about how they've been slandered by the media for being anti-vax, when in reality, they're just, quote, pro-vaccine safety.
Here's a little bit from that post on the Organic Consumers Association website.
Quote, why should we be injecting experimental drugs into people at all when there are safe, effective, tried and true preventative measures?
And then parentheses, healthy food and natural health supplementation to strengthen our immune system and generic drugs for at-home or outpatient treatment to reduce the chances of hospitalization or death in those with serious pre-existing medical conditions.
This is just a slightly better written version of Alex's positions without any fun yelling.
Oh, also on their website, they were promoting a tribunal that they held in April to get to the bottom of the roots of COVID.
And it also served as a way to promote Dr. Joseph Mercola's newest book titled The Truth About COVID-19, Exposing the Great Reset, Lockdowns, Vaccine Passports, and the New Normal.
In fact, their blog routinely reposts things that were originally posted on Mercola's website.
And if you don't know, Joseph Mercola is one of the biggest anti-vax figures that exist in the media.
I have checked out their site, and the Organic Consumers Association, it's hard to tell apart from Mike Adams' Natural News, and they are by far the largest funder of U.S. Right to Know, who are being presented as impartial investigators into the roots of COVID in this article.
That's malpractice, not recognizing that the person that they're citing as a neutral source is essentially an advocate for the unproven position that this article is insinuating.
That said, probably the thing that made me most disappointed about this article is the last paragraph.
Quote, the second grant, understanding risk of zoonotic virus emergence in emerging infectious disease hotspots in Southeast Asia, was awarded in August 2020 and extends through 2025.
The proposal, written in 2019, often seems prescient, focusing on scaling up and deploying resources in Asia in case of an outbreak of an emergent infectious disease, and referring to Asia as, quote, the hottest of the EID hotspots.
Here's the deal.
This article is about the conflicting hypotheses about the origin of the novel coronavirus.
The underlying documents gained by the FOIA request aren't really bombshells or evidence that makes the lab theory more compelling, and yet this article is written as if they should be seen that way.
This grant is, quote, prescient, as opposed to reflecting the well-documented history that many emerging infectious diseases pop up in Asia.
Right to know is a group that's investigating the roots of COVID, not an advocacy group primarily funded by an anti-vax, I'm sorry, pro-vaccine safety outlet of weirdos.
This isn't good.
I think if we were in normal times, I wouldn't really care that much.
This wouldn't be that huge of a screw-up.
You know, media outlets have misses from time to time.
Sometimes you interview somebody and you don't check in all the possible conflicts of interest.
Of course.
And, you know, the problem is that the stakes are too high right now.
For the intercept to lend its credibility to this shit is damaging.
And not least of which, how is it that you can be a journalist in 2021 and actually hear the name U.S. Right to Know and not immediately go, I wonder who that is?
Oh, obviously that's an anti-vax group.
I mean, I saw the quote from U.S. Right to Know and I clicked on the link and immediately I was like, what am I doing here?
There's a global pandemic running amok, and the connection to reality surrounding that pandemic is being used as a wedge issue for extremists to radicalize people into their ranks.
This is not a time to make unforced errors and play directly into the hands of nefarious actors.
So if I were the editor at The Intercept, I might have given another go on this one before I sent it to print.
India basically suspended its vaccine program at 7% of the population because they made their own whole virus vaccine.
And again, the virus is so deadly in a spike protein, not in what it actually carries, that when the body created a response to that, it was also very poisonous.
And so India had to stop because of so many deaths.
People revolted.
And the vaccine they made did knock out all these COVID variants except the Delta variant.
I have no idea where Alex is coming up with all the other stuff, though.
Covaxin recently released data showing their vaccine is 65.2% effective against the Delta variant and 93.4% effective against severe symptomatic COVID.
India currently also has a 12% vaccination rate and is working on getting that number higher.
So I don't know what he's talking about with suspended campaigns.
I don't, I don't, I know it's easy for him, but you can't say the virus is quote-unquote so deadly now.
Like, that's unfair.
You've spent the past how many months telling me that the virus either doesn't exist or isn't as deadly as they say, that the virus is a bioweapon, but it's a fake bioweapon, and the vaccine is the real thing that's deadly.
And now you get to tell me that the virus is so deadly that India's vaccine program is important to talk about.
It's like you don't debate what temperature water freezes at.
You don't debate what temperature it boils at, or what the speed of sound is, or what the speed of light is, or what the atomic weight of uranium is, or fluoride.
These are known things.
And that's what's so incredible.
It's known Fauci created this and then released it, obviously, on purpose, then lied about it.
It's known that they knew that if they created a vaccine for even a common cold, it creates deadly super viruses that are much more destructive.
Also, leaving that aside, here's a good rule for you: don't measure something like the news you have to cover by volume.
Having more paper or presumably more stories, that's not an indication that you have a better or more important stories to cover or that you have stories that you understand or can even communicate to an audience.
We don't even have the staff or the money or the crew to be able to even have a site that's been around 20 years that predicted everything even stay up or be updated.
I'm not complaining.
But so much of our crew that we built up and we expanded and we funded when I got deplatformed didn't cut and run, but just kind of stood back.
Also, Alex playing Dirty Laundry as bumper music while he launches into a string of sensational headlines about people getting run over by horses all across the Western world and all that kind of bullshit.
That's honestly entering the territory of stuff that could possibly be satire.
This absolutely isn't the case, but if Alex were a performance artist desperately trying to clue his audience in that he's doing a bit, this is exactly the song he would choose.
Dirty Laundry is a song where Don Henley is complaining about the way the news had become more sensationalized and tabloid-focused in the early 80s.
Here's some lyrics from that song.
And really imagine if you were doing satire, how this would be hilarious theme music to play on the Alex Jones show.
We can do the innuendo, we can dance and sing.
When it's said and done, we haven't told you a thing.
We all know that crap is king.
Give us dirty laundry.
unidentified
That would be exactly what you would play for Alex if it was a joke.
I mean, obviously, Dan, our population should be controlled by natural predators who take care of us and keep us from fucking starving to death by overpopulation.
So let's take a moment and really let that soak in.
When Joe Rogan has Alex Jones on his show and he treats him like someone who should be taken seriously, what he's doing is validating and tacitly condoning this person who claims on air that Satanists have been trying to recruit him his whole life because Satan can see the future and he knew that eventually Alex would be important for God's plans for the side of the battle.
Alex doesn't say stuff like that on Joe Rogan's show because it would turn off the broader audience and people would laugh at him, having seen him for what he really is and is a raving idiot.
This kind of talk is for Alex's show because it's a pretty safe assumption that anyone who's going to make it 45 minutes into this shit, they're already fairly.
When Alex goes on Rogan, he essentially is recruiting an army of idiots who will never listen to his show, but who are willing to post snarky bullshit about how, like, actually, Alex Jones is more right than he is wrong often.
These fucking rubes provide Alex and Info with tons of free press and make it so the message, you know, will get out to a wider audience.
And then the odds of sucking in people who will resonate with the idea of fighting the literal devil will increase, and those people will get sucked into Alex's revenue stream.
There's nothing really else to say, but shame on you, Joe Rogan.
How dare you?
You know, you have every reason to know that the show that your friend does, that you give support to, is this.
He talks about the devil trying to recruit him for his entire life because the devil can see the future and he knew that Alex would be important to God's battle plan.
You got it.
That's fucked up.
Don't fucking treat him like he's a guy who's read documents.
I mean, think about listening to Alex say what Satan can and cannot do.
Hmm.
Like, what are you doing with a deity at all?
At all.
At all, if you're going to claim that you can talk to God and God told you that Satan can only do certain things and you know it and that you are allowed to tell everybody, just give up on God.
Again, I do seriously wonder what Rogan thinks about having a giant role to play and making it acceptable and edgy to say things like Alex is right about a lot of stuff.
So you need to come to grips, folks, that you're not worried about being put in a ghetto or executed or guillotined because that's what it's going to come down to.
They're coming for us.
You need to worry about your soul and you need to stand against them.
And I've only seen him threaten to play these clips before.
And so he does play it.
And there's one clip, and it's someone clearly fucking with a protester who's telling him that he's evil and that he needs to repent for being involved in abortion.
This is Dr. Robert Santella, who worked at the Family Planning Center in San Diego.
In 2017, Santella lost his medical license, partially due to claims that he, quote, over-prescribed narcotics to six patients and botched an abortion on another patient.
However, another part of the judgment by the medical board of California was that he engaged in unprofessional conduct based on his behavior in that video.
The protester who's confronting Santella claimed that he was acting hyper-aggressively and threatening him with a pair of scissors.
Whatever the case, quote, in a brief phone conversation, Santella told NBC 7 Investigates he lost his composure that day and he regrets his behavior.
As it turns out, Santella was a doctor with a couple of reprimands in his past and a five-year probation stretch in the mid-80s for, quote, gross negligence and incompetence.
Overall, it seems like he was kind of a shithead, exactly the sort of doctor you might expect to fuck with a protester by pretending to be a demon instead of just leaving him alone.
I have been so busy, not complaining, it's just true, that I have not cut a new ad, even though this product has been in for a week, and we were supposed to launch it last week, but I've been so busy covering the news, I didn't do it.
So during the snowman's land, some stations don't care this first little five minutes, but some do.
I'm going to do a plug and an ad that we can run during the network breaks so that I can fund our operation.
And so you can get a great product at the same time.
And like, you know, the different flavors of this show already, just this one episode are like, they're all over the place.
Screaming about the fucking devil and his power set, refusing to actually cover this intercept article that proves that Fauci custom ordered a bio-weapon and then failing to do an ad read so your lazy ass can go home and get drunk.
I mean, can you imagine Dan Rather just all of a sudden being like, hey, I got to cut this lifeline commercial and I don't have the time for it after the show.
My little kid's playing in a baseball game.
So real quick, Lifeline, have you fallen down or something?
So instead of actually covering the intercept story, you'll notice the way that he does this.
Because if you look at the intercept story, it's based on two documents that they have posted in their entirety that are available that they got through FOIA.
Instead of covering the documents, some people might cover the intercept story.
And I think that that would be a way to go about this.
Instead, Alex covers the American journal coverage of the intercept story.
I made it through considerably more, but at the same time, I think it would be silly to demand someone who is not super literate in those sorts of language to be like, oh, you didn't read all of it.
But I would, I still think that Alex has no grasp on this story whatsoever.
We constructed chimeric viruses and re-delivered full-length recombinant SARS-CoV-V from the silco sequence.
All three SARS COVID full-length isolates and two chimeric viruses replicated efficiently in vitro, that's in test tubes, E6 cells, and the hella cells expressing HACE2, Civt, and BAT C ACE2.
This is emerging five viruses.
But not in those without the ACE2246196.
We use the SARS-CoV-Reverse genetics system 7-2 to generate chimeric virus.
His second grant is a little bit more complicated.
A friend who is not a health ranger did describe this to me.
And again, it's kind of the same thing in terms of taking viruses that are found in the wild from sampling and putting them in a laboratory setting where you can see if they can infect cells with ACE2 receptor sites.
Sure, sure, sure.
It's more complicated, but it's very similar in terms of goal and scope.
Yeah, that was another thing that I learned after reading like 50 pages of the grant proposal is just reading that language, just going like, even if I read all of this, it is not my area of understanding.
So just reading all of this information is not going to help me whatsoever.
Just like calling somebody who is not a health ranger is going to be the best way to figure out how the grants work.
And I could see another angle of it too, being like, well, if we have these documents that we got through our FOIA lawsuit and we don't report on them, people will think we're covering something up.
Gentlemen, I don't normally ask Owen Schroyer to let me co-host with him today, but I definitely kind of want the first hour of it because Paul Watson's coming up next hour.
I got a huge guest right now, and I feel like today I've got to get this on record, or I may just tape an emergency report after my show today that we then put out and hopefully air it on his show because.
Where Fauci is in hundreds of pages of documents we showed earlier saying, I want all these viruses combined into a chimera for a new SARS virus so we can make a vaccine.
Because like when Zero Hedge or InfoWars is reporting that Fauci created a bioweapon or whatever, it doesn't really rise any alarms when nothing happens.
You know, like even if you're somebody who treats them as if they're actual journalism or reporting, you've gotten used to like, oh, wow, another cover-up or whatever.
But like the Intercept is at least an outlet that gets some things done.
Their name has been attached to some important pieces of journalism.
And the stakes are really high for Alex to pretend that the Intercept is reporting on documents that prove that Fauci created a bioweapon out of a drop-down menu.
So Stella Emmanuel is one of the doctors who is out promoting hydroxychloroquine as part of that big push last year by that mysterious group, America's Frontline Doctors.
Almost immediately after she appeared in a video endorsing hydroxychloroquine, people began looking into who this doctor was, and they found a gold mine.
In an article in the Daily Beast, Will Sommer reported, quote, she has often claimed that gynecological problems like cysts and endometriosis are in fact caused by people having sex in their dreams with demons and witches.
From the article, quote, according to Emmanuel, people can tell if they've taken a demonic spirit husband or spirit wife, if they have a sex dream about someone they know or a celebrity, wake up aroused, stop getting along with their real-world spouse, lose money, or generally experience any hardship.
Alternately, they could be having a dream sex with a human witch instead of a demon, she posits.
Also from the article, quote, she alleges alien DNA is currently used in medical treatments and that scientists are cooking up a vaccine to prevent people from being religious.
And despite appearing in Washington, D.C. to lobby Congress on Monday, she has said that the government is run in part not by humans, but by reptilians and other aliens.
Okay, so here's why I should be in government because I want to write a law that's just like the you gotta go law, where it's like, if you're this, you know what, live your life, that's fine, but you gotta go.
In addition to all this nonsense, she's claimed that scientists have found a gene that makes people religious and they're trying to find a vaccine against it.
She seems to think that magic eight ball toys are a nefarious plot to make children witches, and she is super, super anti-LGBTQ.
She's, quote, accused gay Americans of practicing, quote, homosexual terrorism.
In the same sermon, she praised a father's decision not to love his transgender son after a gender transition.
Stella Emmanuel is not a serious person and has a ton of very seriously fucked up beliefs.
But a year ago, she had a video that went viral, so Alex is going to bend over backwards, see if he can squeeze any of that attention that he can get out of her.
Wow, I mean, but that's every time I've ever had Morning Wood, I've known that I was sleeping with a demon in my dreams, and that's why I am such a happy person.
Has she ever recognized that sleeping with demons in your dreams brings happiness?
demons are free so i had their conversation is not to be believed and And one of the things, it's one of the reasons that I deemed this episode unacceptable.
But there is one thing that comes up that's like, well, maybe this explains something.
You could ask a four-year-old if satanic means bad, and a four-year-old would say, why would we need the word satanic if it's just a longer version of bad?
So, Klaus Schwab and all these people, Gates, Fauci, all of them together, they're having this COVID pandemic in order to get the vaccines into people, which will turn them into a completely new thing, not a human anymore.
I was specifically thinking, man, history repeats itself.
This is exactly what happened to Noah.
As I was thinking about the stock market collapsing, I was like, man, Noah is going to need to take two of every currency with him as the world is left behind.
You really have to recognize that what's going on is there's an interview where the conservative rational position, the voice of the center, is maybe they're just demon-possessed.
So now the globalists are being told by the devil, right, that they're going to make this clone that'll be immortal, and they're going to download their brain into it, right?
Because you see, when these globalists die, they will die and go to hell.
Yes, they will be cloned.
The Phantom Zone believes in them is a demonic spirit.
And that is why they are so bloodthirsty.
Because what is living in these creatures are demonic spirits.
They're not human beings.
So we don't even know whether some of these people that call themselves globalists, whether they are still the human beings, or the human beings have been killed off, replaced with their clones and their robots that are pure evil.
I mean, the dangerous thought process that she's advancing and that Alex is agreeing with is that, hey, there's really no way to definitively know if, let's say, Bill Gates is a human or if he's a clone that's been taken over by a demon and isn't really even human.
And if he's not human, I mean, he doesn't really have rights.
Well, and if they're showing signs of demonry, well, I think the only person who could possibly tell me exactly who is a Satanist and who is a demon is somebody who's so confident and who's willing to pray for me to just listen to her.
But at that time, I had a vision, and in that vision, I saw human beings walking with people.
It was like human beings and demons walking, or they're what you see, two or three people walking, and some are human beings, and some are other people.
And I've had many situations where the Lord showed me that there are people that are not human among us.
And I was like, what is this all about?
And I've been talking about it and preaching about it for years.
And they say, oh, yeah, you're just crazy.
But really, if you go in the Bible, the Bible talks about it.
But here is what the problem is: how it affects us right now.
This genetically modified human beings, or whatever they are, I don't know whether they are Nephilims or they are clones or they are just demonic spirits in containers, in human-looking containers.
You should watch a movie called They Live.
Because when the Lord gave me this vision, the very next day, I don't know what I was looking for online.
I found that movie, They Leave.
So it actually explains exactly what I'm talking about.
It does seem like that is a very consistent feature.
Thinking that inability to grasp sort of themes, inability to grasp metaphor, symbolism.
That kind of stuff is, it really does.
I'm becoming more and more convinced that that kind of concrete thinking is kind of like not indicative or diagnostic of having this kind of worldview, but it's something that is shared between a lot of folks in what would appear to be separate branches of conspiracy.
You know, I mean, we've talked a lot about like ways to avoid certain things.
And for me, I think there's a really easy balance between free speech and kind of controlling this angle of propaganda.
And I think it's so simple, really.
And it's just like you can't call other people not human.
Like, I feel like that's so simple.
And isn't it at the heart of literally every genocide?
The propaganda almost always begins with dividing people into who is real and who's not, who counts and who doesn't, who's a human being and who's inhuman, or subhuman or below human.
And if the only rule was you just cannot go on the radio or on TV and say and claim that these people are not humans.
Yeah, a lot of the justifications for massive violent campaigns have been predicated on the idea of people being less than human, various groups for whatever reason.
Yeah.
Yeah, I mean, I don't know if that's the only rule I would have, but I certainly would have that as a rule.
What they are doing is they are telling these globalists, this Shashua, all of them, tell it if they are still human, because it is possible that a lot of them have been killed off and is their clone just walking around and doing evil.
So we don't know.
So they are telling them that, don't worry, if you die, we're going to clone you and then we're going to bring back your brain from the internet of things and put it off and you're going to live forever.
So they are trying to depopulate the world so that they can keep the world for themselves.
They are just useful idiots because the devil is not going to give them eternal life.
They're going to die and go to hell.
They will clone them, all right?
But what's going to live inside them is a demonic spirit.
And those, when those clones go around with those demonic spirits inside them, they are so bloodthirsty because they need that.
That is why you hear about child sacrifice.
And now people are dying in the hospitals because these clones have multiplied and they need flesh and blood to live.
So you have to go along with the plan where you're promised that your brain will go into a clone later, which seems stupid for someone to be like, oh, this is a great plan.
So you trick the smartest and most entrepreneurial minds around into going along with this plan when you could just clone them after they were dead and put a demon in them.
It's not just that they are drinking blood to have the fountain of youth.
They actually need it for survival, just like vampires, because they are not human.
You know what I'm saying?
We need to realize that some of these CEOs in the hospitals that don't want patients to be treated, that want to intubate people and kill them, they are not human.
And Alex, as a responsible engager in the public discourse and conversation, he has a responsibility to probably end this interview by saying a lot of this stuff has been really dumb and also dangerous.
I hope that by having this conversation, my audience has been exposed to these ideas and knows that you're not someone to be taken seriously.
So as crazy as this all sounds, whether she's picking up on this psychically discernment with the Holy Spirit in the future or whether it's actually happening now and a lot of it is, that's how crazy this is.
So either, you know, things are crazier than we know and she's right, or the Holy Spirit has given her a vision of the future and this is what's coming.
So I'm going to have a real defensive meltdown over it while I tell people all the shit that I did that I received the consequences for that I refuse to learn from.
And I would just like to, as we end, refocus on how proud Joe Rogan should be of convincing his audience that Alex has worthwhile things to say and that he's generally right about things.
Look, if people didn't know that when they go to the hospital, there's a good chance that it's an evil clone possessed by a demonic spirit trying to kill them.
Well, they might just be going into the hospital thinking that they're going to get medical care.
I don't care who's on whose show, and I don't care any of that stuff.
Cancel culture, blah, blah, blah, whatever the fuck.
I don't care about any of that nonsense, but I do want to be clear that the net effect of having Alex Jones and treating him as anything other than a buffoon and a liar and a dangerous person, all it does is lend credibility that is undeserved to things like what we've listened to on this show.
I mean, it's, and just the level of like, look at all these people trying to kill you as they wade through the blood of people that they have infected.
And I really worry that some people who listen to our show might have the idea that like we could we have any kind of ability to like get Alex off air or or heal the damage that he's caused.
And I've I'm coming around to possibly the thing that we can do is present something that can hopefully be a rebuttal to the point of people who think that Alex has something to say.
Unlike Alex, unlike Alex, who claims that world leaders listen to him, I can guarantee to every one of our listeners, zero world leaders listen to this podcast.