Today, Dan and Jordan check in on what Alex has been up to. In this installment, the gents discuss why guest vetting is important, why Owen Shroyer isn't a "political prisoner," and get into what Dan has dubbed Shadow-Dumbass-Gate. Citations
I've tried to sort of analyze where that happened, like where that disconnect happened, because I know the difference between North Vietnam and North Korea.
What?
I think I've been listening to a bit of that 2003 stuff, and he's...
Singularly preoccupied with war with North Korea at the time.
There is incredibly beautiful opposition to the clear tyranny of 1984 proportions that is taking place across the world.
And you're going to find out who's for slavery and who isn't.
Now, I don't lionize Bill Maher.
I've been a big enemy of Bill Maher.
We had listeners take over.
I mean, I didn't do it.
I didn't order him to do it, but he blamed me, so I took the blame.
I mean, I said, yeah, I support it.
Take over his live studio audience a couple times, exposing Building 7 and the fact that it was blown up.
But when he gets things right and comes out and says, don't block ivermectin, don't censor the Internet, don't censor Alex Jones, Alex Jones gets to speak.
So this is one of these instances here, this clip, where Alex begins a thought, then he rambles so much that the second half of the if-then statement just gets totally lost.
He's saying that he doesn't like Bill Maher, but when he says things that Alex perceives as true, Alex has got to support it.
I fully agree with that under normal circumstances.
For instance...
I think Alex is a lazy, dumb, fraudulent buffoon, and I hate his worldview with a passion.
But I do agree with him about civil asset forfeiture.
We may arrive at our positions differently, And we may never actually be able to work together toward opposition to this thing that we share opposition towards, but I can understand that even the person I think is the worst can be in alignment with my beliefs on occasion.
Alex believes that Bill Maher is one of the main mouthpieces of the globalist conspiracy in the media.
Alex constantly claims that, quote, the left or the globalists have made some announcement of their plans, and the only thing he has to back it up is a clip from Bill Maher's show.
The entire narrative that the left wanted to crash the economy in order to punish Trump, that relied just on a bad joke that Bill Maher made, and I guess maybe a bad dream that Alex had, but that's just what I'm guessing.
The explanation for why Bill Maher is now saying things that Alex agrees with is not a simple matter if someone you don't like has the same perspective as you do on a point.
If anything Alex says means anything, then Bill Maher's on the globalist payroll, and he would never be allowed to say the sort of things that Alex is now applauding him for saying.
So there's a strong part of me that thinks that when Alex says he's the official mouthpiece of the globalist, what he's trying to say is, I don't like them.
I suspect that Alex knows that his show would look really pathetic if he replaced all the intrigue and supposedly documented conspiracies with just him whining about how he doesn't like people and certain ideas.
But that's pretty much what's underneath the entire show.
Also, there's no reason to just conclude that booster shots for COVID would be required every eight months.
A lot of times people are recommended to get booster shots for vaccines on a particular schedule.
Like for tetanus, it's like every 10 years.
What's going on here is that Bill Maher is falling into the same trap that the right-wing media is exploiting, where they take the CDC's announcement that people who are eight months past their point of full vaccination could be eligible to get a booster shot.
And then they're reporting that as if it means that people are going to need booster shots every eight months.
That's a lazy conclusion to come to, and I understand why it's the kind of conversation that plays on Bill Maher's show.
His whole brand is like trying to be edgy, sort of funny and impotently iconoclastic.
So this is exactly how he would have that talk.
It's just not a serious point.
The Department of Health and Human Services put out a press release discussing the option of getting a booster shot, and it's exactly that, an option.
It'll offer greater protection, but there's no indication from the text that anyone's going to be required to take it.
Some people, like Dr. Celine Gunder of the NYU Medical School, they're a little bit wary of the booster plan, but not for the same reasons as Alex and some dum-dums like Bill Maher.
Gounder explained to NPR that, quote, vaccines need to be thought of as population-level interventions.
Also from the article, quote, she argues that getting a higher percentage of people vaccinated will protect the community more than giving already vaccinated people additional shots because it provides community immunity, which reduces the amount of virus present.
Another voice criticizing the plan is Dr. Mike Ryan, the head of the World Health Organization's Health Emergencies Program.
Ryan makes the very solid point that there are tons of people in the developing world who are in need of vaccines and that prioritizing boosters was like, quote, planning to hand out extra life jackets to people who already have life jackets and leaving other people to drown.
There's a lot of intertwined issues that touch on this plan to have booster shot campaigns in the United States, but all of the actual reality-based things have nothing to do with what these idiots like Alex and Bill Maher make their careers complaining about.
That's why there's sudden Satanism on TV and pedophilia on TV and world government on TV and all these lies because they're getting ready for a total financial collapse.
And, you know, we really should just talk about that because this demoralization, these poison shots, that's just getting us ready for the collapse.
And, you know, you tune in here to get tomorrow's news today.
His conception is that the financial collapse is supposed to cause civil unrest, which allows for a crackdown, which brings in martial law that leads to the extermination of the population.
It was a web series where Brody Stevens would interview a comedian, like Patton Oswalt was on one, and there was a mysterious man who was pulling the strings who would give Brody Stevens challenges that he had to accomplish during the interview.
Alex plays this Bill Maher clip, and that takes up a good part of the beginning of the show, but he has another clip that's very important that he also gets to here in this opening stretch.
So Alex is kind of cherry-picking stuff from the CNN interview with Brett Favre.
For instance, Alex has conveniently cut out this little nugget from the interview.
unidentified
And this is from experts, experts on both sides of the argument.
And, you know, the vaccine or the vaccines that have been administered within the last, what, six to eight months didn't go through a 20- or 30-year human trial study that FDA requires.
Alex probably doesn't want to play a clip like that because it makes Brett sound like what he is, an ex-football player who doesn't really know what he's talking about trying to bluff his way through a fairly polite TV interview.
Also, it's probably important to note that Brett Favre wasn't on CNN to talk about his vaccine suspicions.
That was just something that came up.
He was on because he recently put out a PSA urging parents not to let their kids play tackle football because of concerns about CTE.
In 2018, Favre told Megyn Kelly that he probably had thousands of concussions over the span of his career.
This leaves me in really iffy territory.
On the one hand, I applaud Favre for speaking out and trying to protect the next generation from suffering head trauma and potential brain damage.
But on the other hand, I think that if he's doing it while he's also spouting bullshit about COVID vaccines, I worry that he might not be the best concussion awareness ambassador.
Big picture, I'm not really sure I care about what a former football player says about medical advice on a TV show that I don't watch.
Apparently for Alex Jones, the most serious chronicler of the collapse of Western civilization, this is big news.
But for Alex, I just think this is kind of embarrassing.
It feels like the headlines on Alex's show just kind of boil down to him cruising Twitter for a few clips of things that are...
Kind of in pop culture.
And then he just yells about them for a few hours.
Like, imagine the opposite version of this.
How seriously would you take an ostensibly left-wing truth-teller who insisted that they had all the details about the nefarious plans of the right-wing, who weirdly took most of their time on their show critiquing points made on, like, Greg Gutfeld's show, where people are trying to be funny, and celebrating something like, I don't know, Randall Cunningham or John Elway saying that vaccines are cool.
If someone took their time, like, really thinking that these were important, like, these are headlines we need to really focus on, they'd look pretty fucking stupid.
Yeah, we're staring down the barrel of climate change extinction-level events, but first, I gotta shit-talk these guys on the morning zoo crew where I'm from.
Political prisoner Owen Schroyer will be joining us coming up in the last 45 minutes of the fourth hour.
He was only in jail for about four or five hours in the federal jail yesterday, and the judge put some restrictions on him not to talk to people involved on January 6th about the case.
That would be you.
But at the same time, he is a talk show host, and everything he did is on body cam.
You know, I mean, there's a Chevron lawsuit against a guy that's kept him fucking under house arrest for two years because he fought against their destroying a population.
But you know what?
unidentified
He's still allowed to go on his goddamn radio show!
And I think one of the other things that really is important, and this is going to come up whenever Owen's on the show, is that, like, Whatever the case is, he's being allowed to profit off his arrest.
So if you're Alex, you have to get some bad news that your boy got popped.
This is a month-old piece that was going over some data from Israel, where some indications were showing that the Pfizer vaccine was about 39% effective at protecting people from COVID, including the Delta variant.
But Alex is intentionally only telling half the story.
The same Forbes article also covers how the same announcement included a finding that the vaccine offered 92% protection against hospitalization and 91% protection against severe illness.
Alex is also intentionally ignoring the part of this article that discusses the other research that has found conflicting numbers on the general efficacy of the vaccine.
What's going on is just Alex is cherry-picking a detail from a month-old article and ignoring the rest of it that doesn't work for him in pretending that it's news.
It's tough, because what you want the headline of the article to be is essentially, you know, like, hey, there's a 90-some-odd percent chance that you won't get sick or die, so you know what?
Maybe the vaccine doesn't protect against the virus forever perfectly, but you know what?
You're not going to get sick and die, so that's a pretty good win on that overall, right?
You know, I used to joke, and I said, there'll come a time when they claim it's a conspiracy theory that mothers ever breastfed, because they're trying to phase that out because it makes people not as smart, not as healthy.
According to data from 2019, C-section rates in the United States are approximately 31%, which is a bit shy of most people.
Sure.
In many cases, C-sections are absolutely necessary, but apparently it's also an area where there could be intentional or unintentional complications at the medical point of service.
For one thing, many hospitals have limited space for people in labor, and in the interest of making sure that they can cater to all their patients, it's possible that some doctors could do more C-sections than are strictly necessary in order to keep space open.
An article in The Atlantic points out how data seems to indicate that a lot of the prevalence in C-sections can be attributed to this type of behavior.
Quote, if there's any doubt that the culture of individual hospitals can have an effect on a patient's choice of a C-section, one only need observe that hospitals' C-section rates vary from 7% to 70%.
Differences in patient complexity cannot account for that spread.
Just that operational pressure of not being told ever once, like, hey, we need this bed, we need to get this out, you've got to do this C-section, but just a constant awareness of, hey, we're running low on hospital beds.
Hey, there's all this stuff going on.
Hey, the budget's tight.
Hey, all this stuff is in the back of a doctor's mind, and that happens.
There are a lot of interesting issues to unpack as it relates to the issue of C-sections, but Alex is completely wrong about the numbers, and he's also wrong about the idea that C-sections somehow hurt the child.
As for breastfeeding...
Did you know that the CDC releases an annual breastfeeding report card for the United States?
You can find the 2020 report card, and if you do, you'll find that 84.1% of Americans who gave birth in 2017 breastfed, with over 25% exclusively breastfeeding for the first six months.
The call to action on this report card includes both, quote, celebrate state achievements in breastfeeding and breastfeeding supportive maternity care practices and, quote, bring together partners to promote and support breastfeeding.
It's so weird that the CDC would be saying that since they're an evil globalist behemoth and they want to kill everyone.
So weird.
Almost like everything Alex says doesn't mean anything.
Also, just for fun, the top seven states in terms of their score on the MPINC scale, the maternity practices and infant nutrition and care, they're all blue states.
California, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Delaware, New York, Connecticut, and fucking Rhode Island knocking it out of the park with a score of 95. Taking home the gold.
And I think more and more, instead of just covering all the news and all the information, we should talk about the spirituality and God and how to get out of the trance and ways to break the conditioning and just whether you're old or young or black or white.
Or male or female or where you live.
The real thing is, it's a growing process, and I'm not perfect either.
And it's fun to bash liberals, and it's fun to get mad at them, and it's fun to talk about how stupid they are, but that's a reflection on us that we've let that happen.
And here's the other thing that just occurred to me.
So the people who Alex...
The people who follow this far-right stuff, the women specifically, do they realize how close these people would see C-section to abortion very quickly?
If they got rid of abortion, if you banned abortion, they're gonna have to pick something else that's unnatural and unholy, and it's gonna eventually get to women, and there you go!
You know, it's not hard to put that together and be like, no, a natural birth is what it should be, and you should always try and save the child's life and not the mother's life.
Also, I just gotta say that if Alex thinks that the new direction for his show should be not covering the news and talking about rambly, pseudo-spiritual bullshit...
And it does seem like, for what it's worth, there are some indications that getting four injections of this cocktail of antibodies can be effective in helping reduce a person's risk of hospitalization.
Yeah, there are some indications that it could be effective, but it is not a good pandemic control strategy.
It's only useful for people who already have COVID, and it's effective only early on in a case, so that could be a tough window to hit for most people.
That being said, if you go to their own website, to the Regeneron website, you can see that it does have some side effects that Alex maybe should be concerned about.
Quote, serious adverse events were reported in 1.6% of patients in the 2400 milligram group.
These included, quote, pneumonia, hyperglycemia, nausea, and vomiting.
Now, it's important to point out that this can't be used to conclude that the Regeneron treatment actually caused those side effects.
Anyway, the only reason that people like Alex are promoting this now is because Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has opened some Regeneron sites attempting to put a Band-Aid on the COVID problem in his state.
Of course...
This is really dicey, because Regeneron is part-owned by the hedge fund Citadel, and their CEO, Kenneth Griffin, has donated over $10 million to DeSantis' campaigns in 2018 and 2022.
While the drug cocktail itself may be promising, this whole thing has a very strong smell of corruption to it.
Well, I think the argument that I saw that DeSantis had was that there were two possible antibody-related treatments.
One was Eli Lilly, one was this Regeneron, and the Regeneron showed more efficacy in relation to the Delta variant, and that's why he chose to go with it.
Also, as you pointed out, Alex definitely was promoting Remdesivir back when it was a thing that Trump and the right-wing chorus were all excited about.
He's the CEO of Citadel, who has a millions-dollar investment in Regeneron.
But also, that cocktail that Regeneron has is not any more vetted than any COVID vaccine that Alex hates, so that point is moot.
Secondly, the whole issue of liability protection is not to protect the companies, necessarily.
It's to protect consumers.
The entire system of paying people who could have been hurt by vaccines is set up to make it easier for people to get settlements since they would almost never be able to reach the burden of proof required in an actual courtroom.
The companies that produce vaccines are also protected because if they weren't, no one would be able to get settlements.
It's a collective good, so the state takes on that burden.
It makes total sense.
The words liability protection feel like a slam dunk when Alex says them, but they're really not.
Thirdly, Alex says that things have to be transparent.
And what's the definition of transparent to him?
It seems like there's a giant conflict of interest involved in Florida's operating this large-scale Regeneron campaign, and that doesn't scream transparency to me.
Yeah, and also, just because at the point of treatment...
They aren't charging consumers for Regeneron shots?
That doesn't mean the company isn't making a profit.
For one thing, in late 2020, they received a $450 million contract from the federal government to produce this treatment, and in January 2021, the federal government bought all the company's supply for a price estimated at $2.6 billion.
But also, if you're keeping score, these governors like DeSantis, they aren't even paying for this shit.
It's the federal government who Alex hates so much and is full of demons that is paying for this to be able to have people get at the point of treatment.
Instead of accurately discussing a story that he decided to cover on his show, he doesn't prepare at all, and he just chooses to make up details instead.
Like that Regeneron is supplying their injections at cost out of the goodness of their hearts.
That listens to Alex Jones, even Alex saying that a corporation would do something for no profit would have to make you raise your ears up a little bit.
You're gonna go with these billionaires are not trying to make money off of this, and yet I'm supposed to believe that every billionaire is in a secret cult designed to make money off of my death?
So there's a theme that develops kind of over the show, and that is this, like, they're trying to take away these human elements of our lives, like the breastfeeding and the vaginal births.
A lot of this is because the top Rothschilds have died, the top Rockefellers have died, and I know a lot of people that know the top people, and I mean, they are just involved in torturing and murdering people and devil-worshipping and eating vats of feces and chopping their genitals off and torturing themselves.
So for one thing, if these globalists are eating large amounts of poop, you would expect for a lot of them to constantly be in a state of having food poisoning.
Norovirus, rotavirus, and hepatitis A can all be transmitted through oral fecal means, and that's not even taking into account the tons of bacteria and parasites you risk exposing yourself to.
So they better make sure they got clean shit in those vats.
You know, one of the big reasons that there are signs in every restaurant bathroom about how employees have to wash their hands before returning to work is because oral fecal contamination can lead to outbreaks of E. coli or Shingella.
I'm no doctor, but you gotta assume your risk would be much higher if you're eating poo by the vat.
You know, my mother, I told this story 20 years ago.
I told it again just last year.
My mother said, you look at the sunset, and you look at the water and the waves and the beach, and you know it's beautiful, and you know it's good, and you commune with it, and you spiritually connect through God's creation to God, and that is a form of worship electromagnetically and spiritually to God.
And God made us to experience this with Him.
And what do they come out and say?
In Canada, in Australia, New Zealand, do not look at the sunset.
Well, statistically, if you look in the morning and at night when it's low on the horizon, so it's not bad for your eyes, it's been known to massively boost your IQ long-term to cure depression, you name it.
Sun gazing.
Don't look at it once it's up high at all, but right when it's on the horizon, through the filter of the dust, that light just does something in your brain.
And it's all these things God gave us they're trying to take away because these are Satanists.
Do you think these Satanists go at dawn and dusk and stare at the sun?
So I found this really fun, because this, again, is another thing that's sort of in that same chain of trying to take away these human things, like the breastfeeding and vaginal birth sunsets.
They're trying to turn us into pod people by letting us see the sunset.
I want to pledge tonight and tomorrow night and the next night, because depending on where you are, the sun may not be clear in the sky, to only...
For like five minutes right as it's setting, you know, the safe time to do it.
To join me in gazing at God's incredible creation that gives us life and a celebration of life and to thank God.
And the media will spit it and say it's an occult ritual because that's the opposite.
They're telling us don't go look at the sunset, don't look at the sunrise.
And I would like to pledge to the listeners that At sundown central, it doesn't matter where you are in the world, at your sundown, that you go out for five minutes and just pray to God for a global awakening and pray to God for healing and pray to God to send light and love and good energy into the world to give people courage to stand up and do the right thing.
As a society, is get rid of all of our arguments, all of our TV shows, all of our government, and all as a country focus on creating a Truman Show situation for Alex Jones, where we all just do this weird shit.
When you're pepper spraying people's children and stuff, you think the good guys that don't want power and don't want violence, you think when you beat our kids up and our wives up and our fathers and brothers up, you think it makes us go away?
No, it makes us think about what we're going to do to you and we will do something.
Don't you worry about it.
Oh, and you're like, good, we'll call you terrorists.
Oh, really?
You'll just get the whole party going, won't you?
You can't even hold Afghanistan.
You can't run your blue cities full of feces and fentanyl.
All you can do is murder us all day and sit around and slap yourselves on the back.
But I see the videos in Nancy Pelosi's parties and Barack Obama's parties.
It looks like a bunch of trash and a bunch of unhappy garbage that all know they're losers and all know they're jokes.
I mean, the whole thing is the Democratic Party are now Satanists.
And you go out to their events?
Undercover, they talk about how much they love Satan and all of it.
And they're really just a bunch of really soft, weird nerds that know Satan rules the planet, and they just want some petty power.
And then they also make jokes about, oh, it doesn't exist, there's not really Satanism, but then that's how they suck everybody into it to control them.
Yeah, Owen goes out to the abortion rallies, and literally the majority of them are, I want to kill babies, I love Satan.
And they're just demonic.
The women act like rabid dogs or something.
And this is what they've been turned into.
They don't love men, they don't love women, they love nobody.
They just run around, Satan, Satan, kill, kill.
We're going to come back with our special guest.
This video was super, super ultra-viral.
And by the way, that video's up on man.video.
I hope that you share the video by Dr. Sean M. Brooks, PhD, over a million, a hundred thousand views right now.
He'll be joining us to really have the floor.
Coming up separately, please do not forget, it's back in stock for a limited time, Vitamin Mineral Fusion.
But our guest, when the producer got him on the phone yesterday, wanted to talk to me, and he said, listen, I want to clear something up.
I went to that high school, and I was there, and I'm a well-known PhD in education, and when you're there, you say what town you live in.
It's Oxford.
I'm not a doctor from Oxford.
The internet had been saying that, so that's cleared up.
But did you still let me on?
I said, yeah, now that I know who you are, I've seen your writings before, and I've heard about some of your books.
I really want you on the show because you're an articulate person.
And it doesn't matter if you're a PhD in education or a medical doctor or a school teacher or, as I said, some guy that, you know, trims people's bushes for a living.
We're all humans and can observe what's going on and speak out.
Not only was I aware that you are a PhD in education who lives in Oxford for didn't go to Oxford, not only did I know that, I was fully aware of your writings and I love your work.
Hey, have you ever considered that if the definition of humanity is more a social thing that we've all agreed upon, that if more people have broken RNA than have non-broken RNA, all of a sudden we're the humans, and you're the not-human?
How do you feel about that?
Do you see how your logic might make you a fucking moron?
Israeli health minister Yuli Edelstein was quoted back in February in the Jerusalem Post.
Quote, whoever chooses not to be vaccinated has his right.
There will also be no personal sanctions against someone who is not vaccinated.
It should be understood that getting vaccinated is a great privilege that has been given to us, something that many countries in the world have not attained.
The article continues, quote, the minister added that there will be some areas that will be open to everyone, even for citizens who have not been vaccinated, and that the possibility of these areas will be expanded depending on the rate of immunization of the entire population.
So now, currently, the conversation is for these things that are already out.
No, I heard actually, and I know Alex hasn't heard this, Illinois has started requiring That you have to use and you have to obtain in order to move in a car from one place to another.
Why is he saying he took it and it's great and if it doesn't work, he'll tell us.
When I just showed you, and it's been out for days, that Pfizer says it's a 39% efficacy rate, and now the head of Pfizer says, oh, new variants are here and his vaccine doesn't work, but don't worry, he's got new ones.
And Trump had just said days before he said that in Alabama.
On Friday, Trump had said it looks like a scam by Pfizer with these boosters.
Apparently what Alex meant by his comments was that he doesn't think that Trump is a dumbass and that he must know what he's doing, which is recommending people get a vaccine that he presumably knows is a scam.
So I guess Alex didn't call Trump a dumbass as much as he called him an evil fraud who's trying to kill his followers.
If I were in charge of deciding how to cover this story, I would lean much more heavily into how Alex is very clearly saying that Trump knows that the vaccines are a secret.
plot to kill everyone for profit and that he's recommending them to his audience anyway.
Covering this story as Alex called Trump a dumbass misses the point a little bit and just makes me think that the reporting doesn't have much awareness of how often Alex says mean things about Trump when he's mad at him.
Like, it's not novel, but I think there's maybe some ground you could gain by really positioning this where, like, okay...
And then in this situation, you would think that Trump would look at that and go, oh, I was just able to exploit them.
I was not actually leading the group.
And the people in the group would go...
Oh, we'll do anything if anybody tells us what we want to hear, and everybody should learn from that and be like, maybe we're both stupid on both sides here.
And this is a negative feedback loop that has repeated itself throughout history every time we've wanted to blow shit up.
So he talks a little bit about his going to this school board meeting and...
yelling a bunch of dumb shit at them sure and I think this is becoming the the favored uh media outlet of right-wing weirdos now yeah because they aren't gonna be on TV um maybe a lot of them have had their social media accounts banned.
So now they can have videos taken of them yelling at people at, Public meetings.
Sean doesn't understand how this case went with Indiana University at all.
What happened was that eight students at IU, which is not a countless number, they sued the school because they announced a vaccine mandate that applies only to the fall 2021 semester.
Though this is mandated, the school offers many options for folks who can't or don't want to get vaccinated.
They offer medical and religious exemptions, they'll let students take a semester off without penalty, and they provide online options for completing classes.
These students had asked the court to enter a preliminary injunction to stop the mandate.
The primary criteria that would be used if the court were to give that injunction is whether or not there is, quote, a strong showing that they will likely succeed on the merits of their claim, that they will sustain irreparable harm and that the balance of harms and the public interest fails.
Ooh, that's 0 for 3!
one-page opinion explaining how they did not feel that this case brought before them satisfies any of those criteria, and thus the injunction was rejected.
If you read the filing, all but one of the eight students either have a religious exemption to the mandate or would qualify but haven't even applied for one.
That one who hasn't applied and thinks she wouldn't qualify, who knows?
Maybe she would.
My point is that this is kind of a farce.
The fact that seven of the eight students suing the university over a policy that is so tailored to them that they all qualify for it not to affect them is the very definition of right-wing victimhood mentality.
My other point is that Sean Brooks has no idea what this case was actually about because the details don't matter.
What's important is the optics of victimhood that he's able to present using this case as a prop.
When you're trying to have a serious conversation about issues that matter, it's generally not a great idea to bring up an example of a court case that you have such a weak grasp on that you have to admit on air that you might have it wrong while you use it as a defense for why you're right.
Don't do that.
That's a bad look.
Alex is bringing up Amy Coney Barrett because after this injunction request was denied, the students tried to pull a Mike Lindell and take things to the Supreme Court.
Judge Barrett is assigned to the Seventh Circuit currently, which includes Indiana, so on paper, it was her who rejected the request to step in and overrule the district court.
But she's not the relevant judge in the case.
She was who the right-wing media decided to get really mad at, though, since she was a Trump appointee, and the presumption was that she would be up for anything.
Yeah, but he seemed mad in a different way than other people who, like, you know, your partner is a teacher, and we've talked a lot of times about things that are failures of the CPS.
We've always known that the Rockefellers and the Carnegies have had everything to do with the K-12 textbook system.
No different in higher ed.
It's the exact same.
They control the information.
They control the minds of those individuals that don't think for themselves.
And again, when I was in college, the books I read were the ones that I went to the bookstore to buy.
They were not the ones that the university said, well, you need to read this, and you need to read that.
I'd look at this $300 textbook and say, no, I'm not reading this.
And I'd glance through it, I'd write a paper for the class, and then that'd be it.
And then I'd go to a bookstore, back when bookstores existed, and I would buy...
Two, three, four books about people, history, events, psychology, sociology, anatomy, physiology, and I would put all of this together, and I'd read on my own time.
So I understand that some people are just too much of free thinkers for this kind of thing, but the reason the classes have textbooks is because they're teaching a specific thing that the teacher presumably has a much better awareness of than the student.
Typically, the teacher will know about the subject ahead of time, and the required texts will be the things that they think are best in terms of enabling a student to get the handle on the material.
I agree that there's problems with the textbook industry, particularly as it relates to how they're essentially an instrument of price gouging in colleges.
But I think that what Sean is expressing here really is just that he's a blowhard and he's an anti-authority kind of guy whose streak has gone a little bit off the rails.
When I was in college, often the required texts for courses wouldn't be textbooks per se.
Depending on the class, it could be a novel, an academic writing, or possibly like a collection of photocopied newspaper articles from the early 1900s.
Also, my dad's a professor, and I've spent my entire life surrounded by academia, and I have never once in my life encountered a professor or teacher who's discouraged reading, even things that aren't on the syllabus.
Typically, people in academia love talking about their subject because they're really versed in it.
And, you know, if you want to read a book that runs counter to their take on the subject that they know a lot about...
They're going to be excited to discuss that book with you and explain to you why it misses X, Y, or Z point.
If you're the sort of person who's so narcissistic and oppositional defiant that you think that you can create a better syllabus than a professional in their field of expertise, then maybe formal education isn't for you.
It's just that it's a lot harder for external observers to know exactly how well a person has or has not taught themselves.
Degrees are generally helpful because they denote that you've learned a subject from someone who understands that subject, and they were able to help you understand it.
There's no way to confer the same kind of thing with self-education.
That's why it's a little bit more...
Eh, iffy.
Also, it's so funny that this dude has such a weird bone to pick about education when he himself kind of intentionally misrepresents his credentials in the video of himself at the school board meeting that went viral.
He apparently does have a PhD, but he introed himself this way.
Quote, Dr. Sean Brooks, Ph.D., Oxford.
I have 48 publications, including 23 books.
I've studied health medicine, anatomy, and physiology for approximately 21 years.
They were able to find a teacher discipline case from Florida that was against a person with the same name, which resulted in a reprimand and probation after Brooks didn't...
Didn't say that he was innocent, but also agreed not to contest the accusations.
I'm not going to get too deep into this because it feels really fucked up, but the issue that was behind this disciplinary action had to do with him posting videos of students discussing really personal issues on a public website without the student's parents' permission.
Some of the stuff involves pretty personal stuff that creeps me out.
I was concerned that this was possibly not the same dude who's here on Alex's show, but first of all, Sean McCullough Brooks is a pretty specific name.
That's real specific.
The documents for the teacher misconduct case include a 2015 letter of reprimand that's addressed to Sean Brooks, whose address is in Oxford, Ohio.
Anyway, it might be a good idea for Alex to screen his guests in the future so he doesn't end up in this kind of situation where he's having to vouch for this guy just because his video went viral.
If you're talking to somebody about how the school system is evil, it's kind of relevant to the conversation to let your listeners know that they may have a big old chip on their shoulder that's informing their positions, and it might have...
Also, what a weird thing whenever, like, textbooks at large are held hostage by fucking Texas's bullshit.
You know what I'm saying?
Like, you're really gonna come after textbooks whenever half of them, just because Texas doesn't want to admit shit, say that slaves came here on a lark?
He's complaining that he's been shut out of higher education, and maybe it has something to do with his disciplinary past that he has, and maybe his response to that disciplinary action.
I don't know.
It seems like you can't have someone be like, I've been shut out of higher education because my ideas are too verboten or whatever.
And then you defend it without knowing anything about the case.
He's covered on this episode three people talking about things that they know absolutely nothing about, but have the expertise of being good at something completely different and with no relation to that subject.
Even if all of those things were accurate, the way Alex is presenting them, the babies and incubators, Jesse Smollett, all of it, even if everything, it still doesn't excuse his behavior as it relates to Sandy Hook.
It has literally nothing to do with what he did.
And, yeah, I guess he's just saying, I'll fuck that one up.
I think I counted just five or six blatant lies from Brian Williams.
I mean, just flat-out lies.
I mean, can you imagine?
Like, you know, sometimes the crew will sit there and, you know, you'll go on a great rant or something, or I'll go on a great rant and say, hey, you know, that was good.
Good job.
That was powerful.
Imagine the crew behind Brian Williams like, wow, this guy can just go on TV and lie.
Like, nobody's business.
I mean, wow, he just went up there and just said a flat-out lie.
I mean, maybe he's just saying that, like, we know there's a guaranteed guilty verdict, so we don't really need to even talk about the case because he did that shit.