Knowledge Fight’s #577 (July 13, 2021) dissects Alex Jones’ baseless claims—like Gmail censoring Infowars or AI scanning private texts—that distort Politico’s vaccine-misinformation report. Jones falsely ties COVID deaths to vaccines, accuses Merkel/Macron/Johnson of fraudulent rule, and warns of "orderly" depopulation via globalist bioweapons, framing resistance as futile. His self-styled martyrdom rhetoric mirrors cult behavior, while fabricated stories (e.g., London’s "Rainbow Dildo Butt Monkey") expose his pattern of cherry-picking pop culture for conspiracy fuel. The episode reveals how his apocalyptic calls—like 2029 doomsday claims—blend biblical fearmongering with violent accelerationism, normalizing extremist paranoia under trivial distractions. [Automatically generated summary]
I've had it cut out a couple times and it comes back and it's just like this lingering chronic problem that I've gotten to the point where I kind of made a decision in my head that it's like, well, it's just never going to change.
Okay, if one of your teammates is going 40 miles an hour headed east and another one of your teammates has immunity, but they're headed 35 miles an hour headed west.
I love the range that they have in terms of their challenges because sometimes it's like these elaborate fucking, like, you have to jump over this, you have to climb this wall, and then you have to unhook something and carry it back over the wall.
Yeah, it's like elaborate courses.
And then sometimes it's like, fuck it, hold your breath.
No, that's, yeah, that's such a, that's maybe my favorite joke in all of Rick and Morty: is Rick sets up this like saw situation where you have to get through challenges.
And then because he was too drunk, you know, the third one is he's just like, ah, I ran out of ideas.
So before we get too deep into this episode, I want to mention that there is a really severe tone that you'll notice throughout this show.
And I noticed even before I started listening to this episode over on banned.video, as I was preparing things, the featured video on the homepage was a Grey Grease video titled, quote, This is the end.
All the King's horses, men, and sensational headlines can't make up for how tired this act is getting.
And when you have these Saturday shows that are like four guests deep, and it's just like, all right, let's see what Nick Fuentes is going to bring to the mix.
Let's bring Pachenek in here, Barnes.
You know, like you do that, and it's like, well, at least that'll be different than Alex rambling on about bullshit.
Yeah.
If I were him, if I were Alex, I'd be a bit worried about this phenomenon.
Like, he's still pulling way better numbers than Owen Schroyer and Harrison Smith, but I was looking around, and he's pretty consistently getting beat by Greg Reese's sensational last little video essay.
So I'm glad that one of our writers read that article, thought it was important.
It was just hidden in plain view.
Saki talking to the press, saying, yeah, we're getting ready to start the DNC is.
I guess their new national police force they've announced.
That's actually who.
And the Pentagon with trainees from the Southern Poverty Law Center and ADL to read all of your text messages, have them scanned by AI, flagged, and then they're going to block your ability to say certain things.
And they're actually going to go into the autofill function and not let you type certain things even before it's been scanned when you try to send it.
So first of all, up to this point, Alex has not specified what article his employee showed him that spelled all this out.
He's made reference to how important it is a couple of times, but I have no specifics to work on other than I think it was in Politico.
Now, let's really break down the claim that Alex is making here, because I think if you look at the constituent parts of this conspiracy, you'll see how desperately he's just grabbing at straws, trying to make stuff up.
So press secretary Jen Saki said in a press conference that the DNC's new police force has teamed up with the Pentagon and they're enlisting trainees from the ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center to read literally everyone's text messages.
This will be achieved by feeding the text through an unspecified AI system, which will flag problematic texts and I guess stop them from being delivered while a human review takes place, I guess.
This is also going to somehow affect the autofill function of every different phone company's operating system, which is going to make it so you can't type certain things.
Now, autofill apparently will no longer just suggest words that you might be typing, but will force you to take their suggestions, which seems like a user experience nightmare waiting to happen.
Like, even if you were an evil, all-powerful cabal bent on trying to censor everyone's text messages, this would be a dumb, dumb way to do it.
For one reason, the auto-fill thing would cause an uproar in the consumer base.
We've seen over and over again that in the realm of digital communication, if certain words are banned, people will try to find ways to use code or replace letters with symbols to get around scanning.
If a company were to impose word restrictions to the point where it affected the customer's ability to use the product, people would adapt communication or stop using the product.
What's going on here is that Alex has just evolved his conspiracy about that bill we talked about in the last episode, that Anti-Racism and Public Health Act of 2021 that probably isn't going to pass.
And now it's not just about the ADL and SPLC reading your medical records.
Now they scan all your text messages.
Yeah, it's evolved thanks to this politico article, I think.
Yeah, I think what's funny about that is more than anything else, more than any of Trump's lies or the conservative propaganda, a massive amount of consumer inconvenience would lead to an overthrow of our government more than like, oh, they stole the election.
Everybody's like, eh, politics is corrupt.
But if you're like, I can't text my friends anymore, it's over.
What just occurred to me, what just occurred to me more than anything else was with that email thing, How could you listen to the show and believe him when you almost certainly have emailed links to your family that day?
Do you know what I mean?
Like, they are always sending links to each other to InfoWars stuff.
They're always sending out emails with InfoWars links.
But now that I have gotten surgery, I can rock climb.
And I found a grip.
So this was an article in Politico by Natasha Korecki titled, quote, Potentially a Death Sentence.
White House Goes Off on Vaccine Fearmongers.
The sentence from the article that's caused this intense backlash from Alex and Tucker and all their ilk is this, quote, Biden-allied groups, including the Democratic National Committee, are also planning to engage fact-checkers more aggressively and work with SMS carriers to dispel misinformation about vaccines that are sent over social media and text messages.
That sounds pretty scary, but if you read the entirety of the article, it's pretty clear that what they're talking about is not individual users, but organizations that use text messages to send mass messages that are directed towards eroding public health.
The article brings up Charlie Kirk in Turning Point USA.
Quote, Turning Point Action, a 501c4 affiliated with TPUSA, has also sent out SMS messages urging people to sign petitions on the topic.
In one message viewed by Politico, Kirk contends, quote, Biden is sending goons door to door to make you take a COVID-19 vaccine.
Sign the petition, no medical raids in America.
This is obviously a problem, and when you're in a leadership position, you have to choose what you're going to do.
You can try to address the problem of people like Charlie Kirk literally profiting off letting his audience die, or you can do nothing and accept that a certain subset of the population is going to be misled off a cliff by this type of messaging.
I don't know what the right call would be here, and I have no interest in being in a leadership position because I couldn't solve a problem like this.
I can say that I would be uncomfortable with the government itself taking action and reading people's text messages and such, if that's what they were doing, even if there were mass texts being sent out by clearly bad faith actors like someone like Charlie Kirk.
Thankfully, Natasha Korecki, the writer of the Politico piece, clarified on Twitter what was meant by that sentence that's fueled a couple days of right-wing media outrage.
Quote, as the story points out, it's allied private groups that are working with SMS carriers, not the White House.
Even then, there's no ability for groups to read individual texts aside from ones they receive themselves.
This adds a lot of complexion to the story.
So these are groups that are allied with the White House that are trying to work with text messaging providers to enlist them to limit the ability of people like Charlie Kirk to spam misinformation over the phone.
They wouldn't be able to read texts prior to them being sent.
It would likely result in a system where like if a recipient complained to their text provider, they'd look into it and act however they decided was in their company's interests.
The version of the story that Alex is reporting is entirely dishonest, but there's a kerdle of something that probably should be discussed underneath it, I think.
I don't care about Alex's position on it, but I think that there's something, there's something important.
There's a really tough question they have to wrestle with, and that is, should speech that demonstrably puts people at risk be as protected as any other kind of speech?
And if so, at what point does that risk become a problem?
The courts have held that you can be charged for encouraging harm in someone via text messages, even though it would appear that that's just you engaging in speech.
Michelle Carter was sentenced to 15 months in prison for involuntary manslaughter after she encouraged her boyfriend to commit suicide.
The appeals court upheld her conviction, and the Supreme Court decided not to hear the case, which implies that they didn't consider the ruling to be a true infringement of the First Amendment rights.
This may not be an exact parallel, but there has been a willingness from courts to rule that to a certain extent, encouraging harm can constitute speech that is not protected.
The direct harm in Carter's case is much clearer, but when almost everyone dying in the United States of COVID is now unvaccinated, it does feel like directly discouraging vaccination through dishonest means could be argued to be an attempt to cause harm.
I don't know where, I don't know, and I don't know where the line would be, but I do think that there's probably a discussion to be had by, I don't know, far more insightful people than even myself, and certainly more insightful than Alex.
I mean, so if I was looking at it, I would say the first thing that you have to do before you take any action is prove that it's malicious and repetitive, right?
So if they're constantly spamming out malicious lies, then that seems like a much easier way to deal with it than just being like, hey, blanket, you can or can't do this.
You know, to allow for error, say, say if you get caught spamming lies, which it's not hard to tell if they're lies or not, repeatedly after being told that you can't lie to people anymore, then you get fucking destroyed or fined or whatever it is, you know?
That kind of thing.
It's not necessarily a we can ban or unban speech so much as.
I would almost even add in a qualifier that there needs to be a profit motive too, because I think that people can be misled and sincerely do harm by way of belief system or not even belief system, but just like having the wrong information or whatever.
They can think that they're doing the right thing and do something that is.
It's almost entirely about ways that people are trying to fight back against the right-wing misinformation campaign about Biden's proposed door-to-door awareness outreach about the vaccination campaign.
Like people saying it's going to be people coming to your door with needles and stuff.
Right, right.
It's people from the community coming around and being like, hey, you know, it's easier than you might think to go get a shot.
If you think that there are hurdles and you would like to get a shot, there aren't hurdles.
The ADL and SBLC are not mentioned once in the Politico article.
I guess Alex could just read the term Biden-allied groups and assume that's which groups the article is talking about, but that's no better than just a guess on his part.
This is a complete misrepresentation of what Nova Scotian health official Dr. Strang said in a clip Alex covered a few weeks back.
Strang just made an offhand comment about one of the advantages of large gatherings not happening is that it limits the ability of people spreading misinformation from gathering and disseminating dangerous public health messages.
The broader context of the video, as we talked about, is Strang and Premier Rankin fielding questions about whether or not it was wise of them to open up schools and businesses, which they were doing.
Alex is completely making up all the surrounding context of this clip, most likely because he doesn't even actually remember what was said.
I do get the strong sense that he, at a certain point, only remembers the fake version of things that he's repeated on his show.
I do like the irony, though, of that entire press conference really being about how they were opening up and people were concerned that it was too early.
Whenever he brings up something incongruous that doesn't sound like it could happen, he doesn't seem like he ever entertains the possibility that it actually couldn't happen.
And organizing legislatures and governors and society and shunning corporations and businesses that are the first to try to bully us in to these vaccine passports.
Can we stop them?
Because once they get their world ID, that thing's going to tell you under a carbon rationing tax where you can go, what you can do, what you can eat, who you can live with, everything.
They admit that's the plan.
This global internet ID is for social credit control.
It is for surveillance.
And it's all being shoehorned in under the name of COVID.
Oh, we're going to read your text messages and censor them for COVID and elections and other news.
Man, you know, it's just sometimes you really want to like grab these people and just shake them by the shoulders and be like, the whole point is that despite how awful you are, I am still trying to not kill you.
That's the idea.
The way you are acting makes me not want to care if you live or die, but I'm still not letting you die.
And I think that that's one of the things that makes this question about these spam messages that are detrimental to public health so challenging is that like the alternative to trying to find a solution to it is just cutting your losses and just being like, well, these people are just going to die.
Even if you disagree with these people, even if you have a fundamental difference in, I mean, even, you know, as far as it could be tenable, the difference in ideas about reality.
And here they are, almost two years ago, talking about what it's really all about, silencing their number one enemy who's aware of their criminal activity.
Because if everybody ever figures out that what I'm telling you is their real plan, not my opinion, it's game over.
I feel like after a certain length of time listening to this show on the regular, eventually you would go, It is strange that they can never find the clip that says what Alex says the clip says.
I intend not in the next segment, start of the next hour, to explain exactly how they're going to close the net, the noose around our necks, and slowly destroy us in the next few years and just what the world's going to look like then if we don't turn this around.
And I would suggest you record this because if we're unable to stop them very soon, the next six months to a year, we're not going to be on the air anymore.
And that's going to be a major canary in the coal mine, really, for the end of this phase.
And then it's going to be a much, much darker, long, horrible future for humanity.
I've really tried to warn everybody as best I could.
Also, it's so funny to me that Alex is pretending he has any room left to claim that his enemies are going to close some metaphorical noose in the next few years.
Like six months ago, back when he was powling around with David Ike and trying to see if there was money to be made and just denying that COVID even existed, Alex became enamored with a metaphor that Ike would use regularly.
Ike would describe a room.
It's a bad room.
You don't want to be in that room.
It's like an interrogation room or like a torture chamber, right?
This metaphor serves exactly the same purpose as the articulation that Alex is deploying with the closing of the noose.
For a very long stretch, Alex would consistently repeat David Icke's metaphor about the door being closed now and how we're stuck in the room with the globalist.
And this was months ago.
There's just zero credibility in him playing this game now with slightly different words.
Like, did we find a way out of the metaphorical room only to end up in a noose?
Well, what happens is you go in the room, they lure you in because the room is filled with chocolate, all kinds of good chocolates, all kinds of bonbons.
They close the door behind you.
Boom.
What pops out of the two-way mirror?
Raptor.
And we know what they do to you if you got fucking chocolate, man.
Yeah, I don't know if, I don't know if we can live in 2021 now and listen, I mean, read and watch all of these people redo the fucking late 80s with Super Predators and not immediately go like, oh, this is all massively racist.
This is horrific.
All of this, like, oh, crime is getting out of control shit, despite the fact that it's been lower than it has been since the fucking 60s or whatever.
That's you.
There's no way you can't see that as like, we're trying to get more black people in jail.
So, this morning, I've got my parents coming over for dinner tonight, and they're smart, but I'm just going to tell them all bets are off, and we need to have a discussion about how we protect ourselves at this point.
Because we tried to stop the New World Order takeover.
And I'll explain coming up, start of the next hour, why, but just to give you a little prelude, they had to because we exposed their long-term strategic plan.
They were always going to do what they're doing now.
They were planning to launch it around 2030 instead of now.
If any type of populist or Christian group or nationalist group ever got control of enough countries to challenge their world government plan.
And they were always planning the depopulation regardless later once they thought they had us under their thumb and can do it in an orderly fashion.
But they will do it in a disorderly fashion in an attempt to maintain control.
So they're going to kill you one way or the other.
They're going to murder you and your family one way or another.
It's their stated plan.
The question is, are you going to let them do it on their timetable in 10 years and succeed or are you going to make them do it next year or maybe next month?
I find it challenging to even come up with the right words to condemn this because honestly, what could he possibly be advocating for other than vigilante action against his imagined enemies or acts of domestic terror?
I know that we've heard Alex discuss how the globalists prefer an orderly killing of everyone, but Alex and his friends are screwed because the globalists have a plan B, which is to kill everyone off with super bio weapons.
What I haven't heard Alex advocate is that his audience should engage in actions that they would think would escalate things towards plan B coming into play.
That is a bizarre and terrifying version of fantasy-based accelerationism.
There is no group that's threatening to kill off the public in 10 years or possibly a year or a month.
That's a creation of Alex's inability or unwillingness to read combined with his intense greed and his psychotic worldview.
No actions that Alex's audience takes can make it any more or less likely that a worldwide bioattack kill-off is going to happen because that's just a paranoid fantasy that Alex uses to make money.
But people are real.
And the actions that his audience could take in an attempt to disrupt the globalists' supposed plan to kill everyone in an orderly fashion in 10 years could have severe implications for the general public.
I'm somewhat comforted by how ineffectual and inactive Alex's audience seems to be, but even so, this kind of rhetoric is completely unacceptable.
And I think it's even a departure from the norm for Alex.
Alex has introduced the idea that the globalists have a plan that is bent on depopulation.
He also introduced the idea that the listeners of his show are as good as dead already.
What I haven't really ever heard him do is what he's doing in this clip, which is combining those two ideas into what seems to be an appeal for people to force the government to kill them in order to accelerate the standoff he wants with his imaginary enemies.
Well, and the two options are: you can wait around and be killed in the orderly fashion in 10 years, or you can do something to force the globalists' hand to do it now, but we're all going to be dead no matter what.
You and me, not you and me, literally, but everyone, yep, just people get hurt by everyone who's trying to exist in our reality, the real one, yeah.
The like attacks on the federal building, like the Oklahoma City bombing that destroyed a community, like the traumatized a community, killed people, just people.
Yeah, it's not, it's it, I'm not saying that that's what's going to happen, but this kind of rhetoric leads in that direction.
And I don't see, I don't see how this kind of talk can possibly be directed towards awareness campaigns for like let's get a law passed.
Well, I mean, the reality, the reality is after the sixth, and nobody who was at fault for it took any punishment or I mean, it doesn't even seem like people are caring anymore.
Why wouldn't you keep doing this?
I saw it didn't work last time, but nobody's gonna stop you from doing it again.
Can you imagine going to work every day and like knowing through any kind of intelligence report that you have access to that that guy across the fucking hall from you was ready to murder you?
I understand the worship of capitalism, but do they not see how fucking parodic it is to go from you're all dead, all of you, farmers, specifically farmers.
I've said I'm in Landermasher plan and I've done it to a certain extent, but I really want to go through the intricacies of this so that you understand that I'm not blowing smoke at you.
I don't want to say these things and it hurts me really bad to say these things.
And I'll tell you why it hurts me.
I don't like admitting it's cool to myself and I want to explain something to you.
When I put out headlines like the globalists must be arrested, their system dismantled now, or billions will die, that moves it one second closer on the clock for them to smash me flatter than a pancake.
And I'm a tough guy.
I got a lot of courage.
I'm not going to back down, but I don't enjoy messing with these people.
Putting out a headline that's such a transparently desperate attempt to grab attention puts Alex one step closer to not having any sensationalism cards left to play.
If his insistence that you do what he says now or billions will die doesn't move the needle, how much louder can he possibly scream that the sky is falling?
If I were him, I really wouldn't be too concerned about it.
If there's one thing that the InfoWars audience is good at, it's being distracted by shiny new things to be afraid of.
And I don't think it'll be that big of a concern.
Although, the swing that we're in right now is a pretty protracted, pretty severe, pretty long one in terms of his career.
So this was about an event that happened at Good Maze Library in London, which did appear to include what you might unfortunately call a Rainbow Dildo Butt Monkey.
This was part of a carnival act put on by a group called Mandinga Arts Group.
And they do a thing called monkey business, where some of the members dress up as brightly colored monkeys with plastic butts, and I regret to inform you, fake penises.
This appears to be a situation where this art group had an act that they did, and they got booked for a gig that maybe they should not have been booked for.
The library's events are booked by a local charity called Vision RCL, and it appears that that's where the real breakdown happened.
They booked what could be argued as a reputable arts group to do a performance for an event, and then they showed up with some pretty fucked up costumes, considering the audience.
Everyone is up in arms about this, and there's internal investigations open into how it ended up happening.
But suffice it to say that Alex is telling a completely fabricated version of this story to outrage the audience.
There's no indication that I can tell from any of the articles that I've read about this incident that any of the monkeys had contact with children, let alone what Alex is describing.
This is just his grotesque imagination trying to push the listener's buttons so he can override their rational minds and get them into a purely reactive state.
Like there's so many times like you know, I've done a college show before where the booker is like some 19-year-old kid and they're like, we're so excited.
We've got like, this is going to be so much fun.
This is so cool.
And then you get into like a nowhere fucking cafeteria without a mic or anything.
And they're like, okay, here are all the things that the school says you're not allowed to talk about.
And you're like, you could have sent me an email and I would have said no.
By the time I pulled over in the truck seconds after and got out, I was watching the guy's head almost completely cut off and the body was trying to get up.
And then I saw this other person's arm half cut off.
The body you were?
That's why it was so personal.
It was my friends, and I was behind them racing with them.
We were in a truck, and I wasn't even driving.
I wasn't even 16 yet.
I was 15.
My buddy was driving.
He was 16.
And they were racing.
And I remember my buddy saying, I'm not speeding.
I'm not going past 120.
So we were back from them, but about 20 cars.
But by the time that thing blew out and then spun and all that happened, by the time that happened and we pulled up, it was just instantaneous.
And I got out of the car and they'd flipped over onto the railroad trestle right there.
And I just sat there and looked at that and I watched that.
It's the same thing.
It's like the slow motion of that Corvette spinning in all those pieces and watching those bodies fly.
And that's the slow motion.
I mean, they really just killed 20 million people.
So I decided I'd see if I could find any instances of drag race-related deaths of youths in Corvettes from around the years when Alex would have been the right age that he's describing.
Alex was born in 1974, so I looked at cases I could find from between 1988 and 1990.
The first case that came up was of an 18-year-old named Chris Ehler, who lived in a suburb of Dallas, so right near Rockwall in the area, and died in a drag racing accident while driving a Corvette in what's described as a, quote, fiery crash.
This was on the night of Christmas 1989.
So it's in the ballpark.
If this is who Alex is talking about, then he swung with a wild crew since Chris's mother is currently in prison for hiring a guy to kill the woman who was sleeping with her estranged husband.
This is actually the only case that I could find that fit the details that Alex is describing, but that doesn't actually prove that it's the one he is talking about.
Whatever the case is, he's either making this story up or he's describing a life experience that would leave such deep scars in a person that they would need tons of therapy and years of work to process what they'd been through.
Seeing anyone die as a teen is an immense trauma, but seeing a friend die in a grisly fashion like what Alex described, that would be so hard to deal with, even with appropriate help and care.
Like the imprint of that would be almost unfathomable.
It's one of those situations where you've seen that before where somebody, I don't know if you've been in that experience where somebody gets caught with it, but you've been in that situation where you've been like, wow, that's a really good story.
And then later on, somebody's like, you know, that's not, that's not his story.
I mean, they really just killed 20 million people.
That means all the Facebook workers, all the Twitter workers, all the YouTube workers, all of you that blocked the ivermectin and blocked the hydroxychloroquine.
You helped murder all those people.
And then you helped murder the 20-something million that have starved to death on top of all the other dead people.
You did that.
And you don't even care.
Because it's modern warfare.
You get to sit back like a technocrat and turn the economy off.
And then all you got to do working at big tech is censor everybody talking about it.
And you sit back and watch everybody die.
And then you point your finger at me and call me a racist.
What the hell does that even mean?
I said I'd play the Tucker Carlson thing, and I got all this other news to hit.
And I'm going to have to take some time off.
I'm not complaining.
You know, I almost feel like my mission is complete.
I really do.
I feel like we're here now.
And if people don't do anything about it, it's not that I don't want to keep working.
I don't want to keep talking.
I just at a certain point, why do I have to go find the politico article saying we're spying on all your text messages and they're going to control them and make a big deal about it?
It's reached the point where it's like, well, if people aren't shooting now, I can't do anything else without getting myself in actual like legal prison trouble.
I don't understand the level of douchebag and whiny, like, over-sensitive lunatic you have to be to not immediately laugh at Rainbow Dildo Butt Monkey.
Look, Tipper Gore would be like, listen, Rainbow Dildo Butt Monkey is funny.
I'm sorry.
It's not my fault.
Look, I don't like porn, but Rainbow Dildo Butt Monkey is funny.
What's going to be done so you've got a chance to change your future?
Like when you're going to condemn a building or when you're going to take somebody's property, they had to pay property taxes on, you got to, for a year or longer, depending on local law, run an ad every month saying, I'm going to take this property.
So Chris Carter didn't say the things Alex is saying.
This didn't even have to do with the X-Files.
It was a claim that was made by Dean Haglund, one of the stars of the X-Files spin-off, The Lone Gunman.
Part of the pilot episode of that show involved plot elements that were somewhat similar to the events of 9-11, but aired prior to 9-11.
And Haglund used this to make a bit of a foray into the 9-11 conspiracy world, heavily implying that the powers that be injected plots into their show.
Also, if the globalists really felt like they needed to make a public post of their plans, why would they choose to do it in the spin-off show?
Wouldn't more people see it if they did it on the X-Files?
Like, if it satisfies the intergalactic law to put some predictive programming on pilots of spin-off shows, then why not just do it as an episode of some dog shit show no one watches on the depths of deep cable?
I mean, this is something I would like to actually discuss because, like, you know, the thing in the Hitchhiker's Guide is like they had the post of the destruction of Earth.
Also, after learning as much as I can about this Haiti situation, I think the CIA is 100% useless because it appears that some random doctor in Florida can just hire a hit team and then successfully murder a president.
So, there are some similarities between the plot of that episode of The Lone Gunman and the events of 9-11, but there are also major differences that are just ignored by Alex.
Like, for instance, in the show, the attack is a single airplane and it's remote-controlled.
The Lone Gunmen have to gain control of the remote control plane and save the day, which they do, which shouldn't happen in the real world.
So the elements of the show's plot that are similar to the events that happened in the real world later are actually not too surprising if you think about it.
There had been a previous attack on the World Trade Center, so that wasn't completely unheard of.
The idea of staging such an attack in order to boost weapon sales, that's a well-conceived plot, which makes sense, considering that Chris Carter and the future creator of Breaking Bad, Vince Gilligan, wrote the episode.
Also, I need to get out in front of this, like, just in case there's any kind of fucking shit.
The fourth episode of The Lone Gunman was written by someone named Colin Friesen.
And as far as I know, I don't have any relatives' names to Colin.
The episode of The X-Files that Alex is pretending was about the COVID vaccine is titled One Breath.
It's episode number eight of season two.
Essentially, Scully is hospitalized, and Mulder enlists the Lone Gunman to help him figure out what's up.
They get her medical charts and find there's protein chains that appear to have been part of an experimental tracking system, but they're inactive, so they've become toxic inside her.
She doesn't die, and it's not a soft-kill weapon.
Alex is just cherry-picking details from pop culture shows to try and create the impression that he wants, but it's all bullshit.
Also, he's creating a very inaccurate perception that the lone gunmen were basically the stars of the X-Files.
Yeah, it bums me out so hard, all of that kind of predictive programming stuff, or somebody being like, the CIA came to me and told me what was going to happen with the World Trade Center.
And then after a decade of just believing shit that people told me about it, I read up on it that, no, he attacked it before.
Because let me tell you, imagine me and Alex Jones.
Like, I knew they were planning all this, and I saw him doing it.
And now it's all happening, and I'm still on air.
And I'm just wondering, with a scientific American running headlines, confirm we live in a simulation, or is that just a cop-out so people say, oh, I can't handle it.
It's a simulation.
No, the third dimension's real.
The planet's real.
God made this as a genetic, real-world, real-life simulation.
The worst case scenario of acting as if it's not a simulation and we are in a real world where there are consequences and everyone exists and we have responsibilities towards each other.
The worst case scenario is at the end of it, you're like, boy, I was foolish for thinking that.
And the primary reason for that is that I don't believe that it is ethical for us to do this show where we go over his content if there is a possibility that we are directly affecting his content.
And I think that somebody calling in who's one of our listeners and bringing up things from our show or something to him is too much of an incursion into his content.
And then it becomes a situation where I can't really know what is what.
I believe we were talking before the show, and I was like, we can't study him in his natural habitat if we are affecting the natural habitat, if we're interacting with it.
And I try to keep that as best as possible.
Now, we did do, and we agreed to be in the New York Times that story.
Sure.
And one of the reasons that I felt that was kind of okay was that we were, it's not totally affecting the content, just the awareness that we exist.
But the direct interference, I just, I find it to be something that makes me kind of uncomfortable.
I can't make anyone behave in a certain way.
Like, certainly I can't say don't call in and expect anyone to care.
But just as a courtesy, if you care about what my position is, I would appreciate it if people didn't call in as much fun as it might be to fuck with him.
Yeah.
I don't think that it kind of serves, it works across my purposes.
Yeah, I mean, to go to survivor, you know, eventually whenever the metagame becomes more important or as important as the game, then it's just a different, it's a different thing and it's probably going to eventually explode.
You know, and we're doing a show about him, not a show about him talking about us, talking about him talking about us.
If you look at that, Donald Trump makes a very good appearance, and they're just saying it could be not all I'm doing is asking questions.
If he spoke the physical into existence from the spiritual, the quantum realm, that means that everything, every law that applies in the physical, our world, is from the quantum realm.
That means that you look at Isaac Newton, where every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
The same would apply with our conscious thought, right?
So if we're at right now, 5,988, because if you look at Revelation 13, 3.5 years, right?
So Revelation 13, 5, and there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things, and blasphemies and power was given unto him to continue 40 and two months.
That would be 3.5 years.
Jesus was ministering for 3.5 years.
If you go to Revelation 20, Satan is bound, and I saw an angel come down in heaven, and the key to the bottomless pit and the great chain on his hand, and he laid hold of the dragon.
Who do you think the dragon is?
The dragon's China.
The Tricoms are going to be coming.
Right now, if you go backwards 2,000 years, Jesus Christ is 21 years old.
In 2029, it's going to be the beginning of the way.
You know, somebody put out a question to a bunch of people.
I think it was on like Gizmodo or something.
Like, what's the most damaging conspiracy theory?
And like, everybody had some fairly good responses, you know, like, blah, blah, blah.
The normal ones.
But when you really get down to it, man, John of Patmos pulled out the worst conspiracy theory in the history of the world, and it's killing all of us.