Today, Dan and Jordan end up so disappointed by Alex Jones' 4th of July video that they decide to check in on the Baby Bigot section of his website to see what kind of content Alex is associating himself with these days. (Content warning: transphobia, homophobia...a bunch of other stuff that may be unpleasant) Citations
I don't know why I used sneeze there, but be that as it may, we've said that one of the things people can do is find a charity and donate in the name of Celine.
Also, a personal message came in with that, that is, my neck is freakishly large, which I assume is from the elephant, which they have thick old necks.
Saying, I'm going to try to chart my own course in life.
I'm not just going to believe CNN or the New York Times or the United Nations or Dr. Fauci.
And there's a great example of declaring independence from the New World Order and the globalists and taking our lives back one person, one household, one town, one state, one country at a time.
And it's a big interview, an emergency broadcast that Joe Rogan did, an emergency podcast with two scientists that have been censored, demonetized and persecuted because they're covering mainline truth.
This episode of Rogan's podcast that Alex is referring to came out on June 22nd and didn't feature two scientists, COVID scientists.
It featured one scientist named Pierre Corey and one member of the International.
Sure.
Brett Weinstein, I envy you.
He rose to prominence because he was a professor at Evergreen State College and he got really mad about the 2017 day of absence.
If you forgot about that, it was a thing where every year minority students and faculty members can choose to stay off campus as a way of celebrating the things that they bring to the school.
That Weinstein made a big deal out of this and took it upon himself to enlist the help of Fox News and countless other shitheads to turn this into one of the most pressing matters of free speech in America.
This national attention naturally made the situation on campus more intense and protests began and escalated, which culminated in Weinstein and his wife resigning from the school and suing for 3.8%.
To get some sense of how frivolous his shit was, the school settled the case with him and his wife for $250,000 each, which is a ridiculously small amount for the couple to accept unless they knew they were lucky to get anything.
Also, Brett Weinstein's brother is another member of the intellectual dark web, Eric Weinstein, who's one of the managing directors at Thiel Capital.
That company, of course, is run by Peter Thiel, who famously made giant donations to Trump's 2016 campaign, spoke at the Republican convention that year, and of course bankrolled Hulk Hogan's lawsuit that took down Gawker.
Yeah, my point here is that the Weinsteins are super cool.
He was going on Rogan's show to discuss this along with this doctor friend.
Pierre Corey is a doctor who's been making very suspect claims about ivermectin since at least late 2020, calling it a, quote, wonder drug, even though the actual evidence for such a claim is very lacking.
There are some studies that appear to indicate slight benefits that could come from ivermectin, but they're far from definitive.
Other studies show no benefit from the drug.
There just isn't consistent good data to show that it's a cure, and people who go around promoting it as such are acting in ways that are super dangerous for the general public.
Yeah.
Fourth of July special report, and he decided to open by talking about how Joe Rogan did an episode two weeks ago with this doctor and Brett Weinstein overhyping Ivermectin.
And that's a declaration of independence or something.
Also, since that episode had come out and before this 4th of July report that Alex is doing, Rogan had Quentin Tarantino on as a guest, which should infuriate.
Alex hates Quentin Tarantino, and Joe should know better than to have that kind of a globalist on his show.
Turns out it's an anti-vax outfit run by Robert Kennedy Jr.
They began in 2016 being called the World Mercury Project, but then changed their name, probably because they want to try and obscure the fact that there are out-and-out intense anti-vax advocates as opposed to independent purveyors of information.
Anyway, this is a band of anti-vaccine propagandists, so it makes sense why they would call their outlet something innocuous like The Defender, so you can cite their articles without sounding like you're- I guess that's one of the sources Alex considers not fake news, which is pretty sweet.
It's kind of funny how they get, like, paid by people who are anti-vax people who get money from being anti-vax people.
And by putting this out, people are less likely to take vaccines and more likely to give money to the anti-vax people who pay for the coverage in the Defender.
I'm starting to see how this business model works.
I'm not their slave, and I pledge my life, my honor, my funds, my children, everything I am, on the altar of liberty, as Thomas Jefferson said, over every form of tyranny over the mind of man.
So anyway, I know it's been a while since we've done a little bit of discussion about Jefferson, and Alex quoted him, so I think that we've gone into this a little bit in the past, but I want to read you the larger context of that Jefferson quote that gets thrown around a lot.
This is from a letter from 1800 that he sent to Benjamin Rush.
Quote, I promised you a letter on Christianity, which I have not forgotten.
On the contrary, it is because I have reflected on it that I find much more time necessary for it than I can at present dispose of.
I have a view of the subject which ought to displease neither the rational Christian or deist, and would reconcile many to a character they have too hastily rejected.
I do not know, however, it would reconcile the irritable tribe of prophets who are all in arms against me.
Their hostility is on too interesting ground to be softened.
The delusions into which the XYZ plot shooed it possible to push the people.
The successful experiment made under the prevalence of that delusion on the cause of the Constitution, which while it secured the freedom of the press, covered also the freedom of religion, had given to the clergy a favorite hope of obtaining an establishment of a particular form of Christianity through the United States.
And, as every sect believes its own form, the true one, everyone perhaps hoped for its own, but especially the Episcopalians and Congregationalists.
The returning good sense of our country threatens abortion to their hopes, and they believe that any position of power confided to me will be exerted in opposition to their schemes.
And they believe truly, for I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.
So while it is true that Thomas Jefferson said essentially the words that Alex loves to quote, the reality is that every time Alex repeats that saying, he's using it incorrectly.
The context that Jefferson said those words in had to do with an opposition to Christian churches using the First Amendment freedom of religion to establish what would effectively be an official religion.
of the United States.
Yeah.
unidentified
If Alex had been around in 1800, he would have absolutely been one of the irritable tribe of prophets who were at work.
Alex Jones' 2021 4th of July message, which kind of flies in the face of his routine outbursts about how we're all going to die whenever he has tech problems in studio.
Man, for some of their clickbait titles of their little videos, little clips that they put out of their shows, some of them have okay views, but man, no one is watching their actual shows.
I almost want to go back and see how many old David Knight views we have now and just see if he's really kicking himself, just going like, God damn it, I've got Harrison Smith.
I felt like maybe it was time that we check in and see what kind of content Nick was putting out and that Alex is signing off on and hosting on his own website.
have been shared by a lot of black people and a lot of non-white people in this country she says why stop at independence day we should have a new american flag and this is an op-ed she wrote she said quote the confederate battle flag which was created as a symbol of opposition to the abolition of slavery is just recently tired we don't see it much anymore however on the 6th when the Waving old glory, the memo was received.
It's a little disappointing that the underpinning of Nick's argument is an op-ed that was written by Macy Gray that was published not in the New York Times or the Washington Post, but on Market Watch.
No disrespect to Macy Gray or Market Watch, but this isn't the level of thing that I would expect a self-respecting white nationalist to take seriously.
If you pay close attention to how Nick is discussing this article, you can see a couple of really important assumptions and fabrications that he has to make in order for this to even be something he can use for his narrative.
The first is that he has to take this op-ed written by Macy Gray and present it not just as her opinion, but as an opinion that Nick sure is shared by a lot of non-white people.
I guess if what Nick was responding to is a giant groundswell of support for this op-ed, specifically in non-white communities, then he might be able to make that rhetorical trick work.
But as it's...
He's doing that because he knows it would come off as a little sad if he were just this upset about an op-ed written by a singer whose biggest hit came out just after his first birthday.
He has to make a much bigger deal out of this than it is to justify his outrage.
The second thing he does is escalate the argument that's being made by Macy Gray.
Nick says, quote, she says, why stop at Independence Day?
We should have a new American flag.
This op-ed says nothing about replacing Independence Day with Juneteenth.
The points brought up in this op-ed are things you can agree with or disagree with.
You can think it's a good idea to make a new flag or think it's a bad one, but in order for your reaction to rise to the level of racist outrage that Nick wants to engage in, you really do have to create a straw man version to attack, so that's what he's doing.
And tell me that it's me and Pat Buchanan and Michelle Malkin and the paleocons and Donald Trump fighting to preserve our white, European, Western, Christian identity as a nation.
And these people trying to destroy that and replace it with a black, foreign, non-white, liberation theology, post-colonial...
On the same side against who?
All these Jews and all these intellectuals and all these other people that don't believe in race?
All these boomer idiot conservatives that say that race isn't real and identity isn't real and we all have to build a new country on the fact that we buy Nike and we listen to popular music?
That if you're a white person and you call your bank and say, I'd like to apply for the personal paycheck protection program loan for self-employed people, and they'll tell you...
You're white.
You're not eligible to apply.
You think that's a little similar?
You think if you're a farmer or a restaurant owner and you call up your bank and say, I'd like to apply for the COVID relief because the government wrecked the economy, and they say you're not eligible to apply because you're white, that that's a little bit the same?
I was unaware that white people couldn't get COVID stimulus money.
And in fact, I actually know many white people, some individual citizens and some small business owners, who actually did get loans and stimulus money.
So I tried to look into this a little bit, and I found a couple of stories that kind of are the opposite of what Nick is talking about.
The LA Times reported in April 2020 that U.S. citizens who are immigrants and are married to non-citizens were specifically excluded from Trump's financial relief package.
That covered over one million citizens who were cut out.
Yeah, I was going to say, my problem with Nick's first thought that white people can't get it is that It is mathematically impossible that the vast majority of those funds did not go to white people.
What Nick is talking about was a provision of the COVID relief bill that provided $5 billion in relief to, quote, disadvantaged farmers, approximately a quarter of whom are black.
From an article in the Washington Post, Yeah, the farm version of redlining.
Yeah.
unidentified
Discrimination started a century ago with a series of federal homestead acts that offered mainly white settlers deeply subsidized land.
Since then, local U.S. departments of agriculture offices charged with distributing loans have frequently been found to deny.
Yeah.
farmers don't have clear title to their land, which makes them ineligible for certain USDA loans to purchase livestock or cover the cost of planting, and they have seldom benefited from subsidy payments or trade mitigation compensation.
Almost all of President Donald Trump's $28 billion bailout for those affected by the China trade war went to white farmers.
According to the assessment they cite, the average white farmer received $3,398 from Trump's bailout, while the average black farmer received $422.
There's a larger problem regarding how independent agriculture is treated in this country regardless of race, and that's something that we do absolutely have to work on.
But it's also completely absurd to look at the history of black farming in America and not recognize that there was a concerted attempt to exclude black people from having access to and participating in that market.
You can be against this if you want.
As Nick clearly does want.
But to frame opposition to the provision of the COVID relief bill as white people are being genocided because they can't get COVID stimulus, that's a little bit much.
Considering this is also just a $5 billion provision in a $1.9 trillion bill.
Yeah.
See, I don't know.
I don't know.
I guess maybe if he's talking about something else where all white people couldn't get COVID relief.
I don't know what that is, though.
I know that this was a big talking point among his community and his crowd.
I really despise that the people most obsessed with portraying themselves as, like, self...
Sustaining fucking amazing individualists only ever seem to follow whiny cowards who pick the tiniest bullshit to then tell them that every victimization that they've ever imagined is true.
So there's one really important thing that needs to be kept in mind entirely as we discuss this situation, and that is that this case is pretty recent.
At this point, there is a suspect who's been arrested and charged, but he's not been found guilty.
And while it may very well turn out to be the case that this 18-year-old Darren Brown did in fact kill this 4-year-old child, Nick Fuentes is making a lot of assumptions about the circumstances in order to make this child's death an emotionally resonant centerpiece for his white identity propaganda.
So the woman taking care of the child, the circumstance here is basically that...
The woman was the girlfriend of the child's parent, and the child's parent father had left.
That said, even if you are to break with the American tradition, Nick loves America, you break with that tradition of presuming innocence until a court finds someone guilty, and you decide that he is definitely the murderer, it's still super unfair the way Nick is presenting this case.
Nick is saying that Brown killed this four-year-old child because the child was white and that he hated white people.
I've read a number of pieces about this case and I don't know where Nick could possibly be getting that from.
What seems much more likely is that Darren Brown is somebody who is experiencing a terrifying and awful mental disturbance.
In February of this year Brown was also alleged to have broken into another home nearby and appeared to be in the middle of a burglary when he was confronted by the homeowner.
They got into a quarrel and Brown was removed from the house.
Thereupon, he re-entered and attempted to take the man's two-year-old granddaughter.
The grandfather fought Brown off and protected the young child, but decided not to press charges at that time.
From a CBS article about the situation, quote, Two weeks after the incident, the man ran into Brown at Walmart.
He told police that Brown approached him and apologized, saying he was sorry for breaking into his house and trying to take his grandchild.
Additionally, another neighbor, Jose Alvarado, decided to check his security cameras after the murder to see if he could find anything.
Ten weeks prior to the murder, he found video of Brown, quote, skulking down the street, opening Alvarado's backyard gate and peering in before quickly walking away.
Alvarado has multiple young children.
Brown's mother has also stated that he's a patient at an adult treatment center, and there have been some speculations that he may be schizophrenic.
All of the details of this story are absent from Nick's version of it because those are indications that maybe there's more to this case than just a matter of relative skin colors of victim and alleged perpetrator.
Nick doesn't want to tell people about the multiple other instances in that neighborhood of Brown appearing to be trying to take children because it would overcomplicate the story and make it no longer useful for him to use as a prop that he needs to justify his white identity anger.
And that anger is something he's felt long before.
this case ever came along.
I'm all for humanizing victims of crimes, and I think that what happened here is a complete unqualified tragedy.
From all available evidence, I just don't see any support for the version of the story that Nick is telling where this is a racially motivated crime.
By insisting that this crime is motivated by racial hate towards white people from black people, what Nick is attempting to do is take the justifiable and understandable emotional reaction that a listener might have to hearing about this case, that he wants to transform that into anger at black people and a defensiveness about being white.
He's effectively trying to use this child's death as fuel for his racism machine, which I find repulsive.
One of the main points I want to make here is that all the information that I reviewed, I can find no indication that would lead me to make the assumption that Nick is making about the motive of this case.
Articles often even include a comment from Cameron, the son of...
of the woman who was watching the child at the time.
The way that you interact with this story, if you are at all an empathetic person, is to hear the story and just feel nothing but heartbreak for everyone involved.
It's like if you're wandering up to somebody who is bleeding out on the fucking ground and then you have somebody just barge in and tell you why it's okay for them to be dying and you don't have time to help that person out because you're too busy trying to fight off how fucking awful this person is as they try and kill them.
What has been engendered in the population for the past two years?
What's been engendered in the population for the past 30 years?
Other than anti-white hatred.
What are people learning in the schools?
When you go to grade school and you go to American history class, what do you learn about?
In the new Howard Zinn curriculum, you learn about how white people genocided the indigenous Americans.
White people enslaved black people and brought them over here.
Once freed by whites, whites mistreated blacks by being racist towards them, terrorizing them, segregating them, making them Real quick, so far this is just a list of things that are real.
Because they believed in racial purity of the Aryan race, that made them uniquely evil.
They perpetrated the Holocaust against Jews.
And that was, by far and away, the most obscene, worst genocide ever in the history of the world.
And then, when all was said and done, white people were racist to the Muslims that blew up the World Trade Center.
White people are racist to black criminals and the police.
Basically, people are bred from cradle until grave, thinking that white people are uniquely evil people.
White people bear a special guilt for all the problems of this country, all the problems of every other group, and really, like, all the problems of humanity.
And it's as a consequence of this that these things are becoming more and more common.
White people are being dehumanized.
And when white people are dehumanized, black people are going to start killing white people because they see them as less than human.
And other people are going to start killing white people because they see them as less than human.
How much do you want to bet that this, uh, whatever his name is, That's the consequence of all this anti-white hatred and dehumanization in the media, education system.
And it's even enshrined in the law, systematically, through the government.
So Nick is just making up details, circumstances, motives for this murder, and then using those assumptions as justification that, like, it proves his white people are being dehumanized.
And it's not going to be a white country for very much longer.
In a lot of places, it already isn't.
And in a lot of ways it already isn't a white country anymore.
And as the percentage and proportion of white people diminishes in America relative to non-white people it's going to become more and more of a problem for white people that non-white people don't like us.
This goes back to a few conversations that I've had with the terrible comedians in the circle of the Joe Rogan sphere, that kind of thing, where ultimately what he's really boiling this down to is a theory that he doesn't want to say straight out right.
But basically, white people, we kind of have it coming.
And if they have the numbers, they'll do what we would do in this situation, which is kill everybody.
And that's why one of Nick's primary political motivations and one of the things that is, like, a primary goal is retaining white supremacy over all levers of power.
Because he thinks, like, oh, as soon as we're in the minority, We're going to do what I would want to do.
Yeah, it's a tacit admission that they're genocidal and that they kind of actually have internalized all the guilt that they're blaming other people for and recognizing that, you know what?
White people may have a little bit coming their way.
Like, as he's complaining about the education system in critical race theory, he's just listing all the things that white people have done that are evil, and he's not even bringing up, like, and here's how to balance that out.
He's not doing that at all.
He's just throwing the great replacement theory out with the underpinning that...
White people are genocidal monsters who maybe have some coming their way.
Right, but he's also, I mean, one of the things that I always resent is, like, that notion that, like, all you learn in school is these negative things about white people.
And anybody who makes that point is willfully ignoring all of the very positive things you learn about white history and all of the negative things you learn about other cultures.
You learn...
All sorts of things in school if you actually do the reading.
And they definitely don't put in all the times that white people are propped up and told about how great white people are whenever the real history, you look a little bit further into it and it's like, oh, all the work was done by non-white people.
But we know that non-white people largely regard white people as suspicion, distrust, in some cases, just don't like them, pay them.
Nobody wants to say that.
People are very comfortable talking about racism against blacks or other non-whites.
But nobody talks about the...
The distrust.
Nobody talks about the resentment that non-white people have for white people in the country.
And it's not everybody, but it is a lot of people, and everyone knows that.
As the population becomes less and less white, and as the people in charge of the country and the people enforcing the laws of the people in charge of the country become less and less white, that's going to matter a lot more.
It's so funny, because in the real world, if you heard a video like that, you don't hear about a follow-up video.
This would be like if this is immediately after Michael Richards, and we were done discussing that clip, and you're like, alright, so the next night he was back at the Laugh Factory.
When I say that America is a Christian nation, I'm saying that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, and this is one nation under that God.
Say his name.
unidentified
Applause Applause Applause Applause Applause So if America ceases to be this people, To retain that English cultural framework and the influence of European civilization, if it loses its white demographic core,
Yeah, I mean, I think that a while back, we had sort of a sense that, like, well, I think this deplatforming has a decent chance of Alex eventually just realizing, fuck it.
I genuinely believe that, at a certain point, Alex overtook his line of propaganda.
No, naturally.
But that, like, straight-up, conspiracy-laden, white nationalist-only is absolutely...
Just taking over that wing.
As we watched Alex go from having Jakari Jackson on his show to now, where I'm pitching him a Jakari-Nick Fuentes double-hander, and we see how that goes, I mean, so is the culture.
Our schools, our neighborhoods, our places of business, our economy, our government, our sovereignty, our country is being taken from us.
It was ours at one point.
It belonged to our ancestors, and now it doesn't belong to us.
It belongs to foreigners.
It belongs to the elite who hate us.
Our country is being taken.
And do not underestimate what that means, in particular when it comes to this agenda.
They would have it, if they could, that all of your children would be indoctrinated with trans and gay ideology.
Think about a person like James Younger, the 8-year-old in Texas, who is being forced by his mother under the order of a court to undergo chemical castration with hormone replacement therapy to prevent him from going into puberty.
These are the kinds of horror shows, tragedies, the abominations that are occurring.
It wasn't about a child being forced to take hormone replacement.
It was a situation where the child's parents disagreed on the best path to take in terms of transition, with the father wanting to take a more gradual, watchful waiting approach, and the mother wanting to engage in social affirmation.
I've looked into the case and I don't really feel comfortable about how much of the conversation is wrapped up in a clearly ugly divorce between the two parents.
The larger point here, though, is that it's important to notice and recognize this case has nothing to do with forcing a child to transition or take puberty blockers against their will.
This is just a prop, again, that Nick is using.
Another white child that he's using as, like, look what they're doing.
At what point are the good and decent and Christian conservative people of this country going to stand up and say, that's enough?
And not ask respectful questions, and not have a civil debate, and not be polite, but to say that this cannot go forward one more inch.
The conservative movement is broadly Christian, and you can't find a lot of devout Christians, social conservatives, or anybody that believes anything remotely like the country, or like the base, within the leadership of the party.
Okay, so now we have spiraled into say no to all trans people, their very existence, validity, and also gays and lesbians who've gone pretty far down this road here.
There is no meet-me-in-the-middle between families with biological men and women and men and women getting married and having kids and whatever the hell this is.
People are willing to put up.
They're willing to tolerate some of this.
They were willing to say maybe, okay, people want to get married.
That doesn't have anything to do with me.
Fast forward 15 years and the government is telling people we'll transition your children and cut their penises off and put them on hormone replacement therapy and not tell their parents and you have to be okay with that or you go to jail?
Well, you're pushing the limits of people's tolerance.
People have their limits and they're being pushed right now.
And the person who's going to stand up and say that when they run for office, that person, I think, is going to be a very popular politician.
There's something you brought up, I think, on the last episode, too, is that, like, this rewriting of the Christian position on gay marriage is amazing.
If you stand against evil, you have to stand against evil all the time.
It doesn't just end at transgender bathrooms or girls' locker rooms.
All of it has to go.
And not just trans, but gay too.
And not just trans and gay, but you know what else?
Promiscuity, abortion, feminism.
It all has to go.
Because if you take our worldview through to its logical conclusion, why can't transgender athletes compete in the girls' sports?
Because people can't transition.
And they can't transition because God made them a certain way.
And God made them different.
And the differences are real and significant and they matter.
And if the differences...
And so if women are born with a reproductive apparatus, and so far as we know that's the only way to continue the human population, they have to be making the babies.
And if they're making the babies, and they have a certain disposition to raise them, they've got to raise them too.
And that's a full-time job.
What they're doing is marginalizing normal Christian people.
They're marginalizing anybody that is not totally insane.
Yeah, it's like no matter, no matter, it's one of those just fucking classic fucked up brain stories that have been written about so much as that person who is like, My last name is Fuentes, but I want to be white so bad.
I think you hear stuff like in that last clip, and it's just, it's like the implications of the actual thoughts that he has and the positions that he seems to be espousing for, like, and how dumb they would be in their application in the real world.
Yeah.
His ideas are not really something you should take seriously.
When he first showed up on Infowars, I was like, wow, this YouTube dickhole, Alex has given him a little bit of a platform.
And the path since then is not something that people should ignore.
And Alex getting involved to the level that he is, is playing with fire.
I know that Alex thinks, and he does have some skills in terms of co-option and recognizing ways to make things work best for him, but I don't know if he's met anyone like Nick before.
Well, I mean, there's a part of me that says this isn't exactly that new.
He even brings up Pat Buchanan.
There is an audience for this, and there always has been.
Pat Buchanan was a presidential candidate that they allowed at debates, and he was straight-up white nationalist and let's kill gay people all the time, you know?
But you have that merging of all of these disparate bigotries and a desire to advocate for and work towards a governmental system that is theocratic in nature.
And operates in such a way that would have public laws against being gay.
Public laws against trans existence.
Public laws against feminism.
That's a terrifying prospect of what he is explicitly calling for.
And they come from men and women, listenably, within marriage, you know, having sex.
That's the only way that they're created.
The only way that you get babies, the only way that you perpetuate a society...
That's how you get society.
That is society.
That is how society propagates itself.
That's how it perpetuates itself.
The elemental foundation of the society.
And in order for that process to happen, for children to be created and for them to be raised and inculcated with the culture and to learn what they need to know for the transmission of knowledge, you need to have marriages, you need to have men, and you need to have women.
And by marriage, do not misunderstand what I mean.
The union of souls between one man and one woman in the church.
That's the only way that you get a society.
And anything that is opposed to that, anything that tries to confound that or confuse that or obfuscate that, is pure evil.
I know what he believes, and I think it's gotten probably maybe even a little bit more overt in some ways from the last time I checked in on his content.
And it was bizarre to just click on band.video.
There's a section for him, and these videos are pretty easily accessible.
And whether Alex wants to take ownership of this or not...
So, I guess this works for Alex, as long as Nick doesn't put out any videos that completely undercut the basis of Alex's entire conspiratorial worldview.
And we all laughed about how funny it was that he believes that and how we wish his conspiracy were true and we would be on the side of the bad guys in that conspiracy.
Unbelievable that you can have a video right next to another video, and in one video you say, whenever they dehumanize white people, they think we're less than human, and that leads to white people being killed.
To the next video being like, trans people aren't actually people!