Today, Dan and Jordan welcome Alex Jones back from his Floridian grocery store based vacation. In this installment, Alex lies about some celebrity deaths, decides that Avatar is predictive programming, and ruins Jordan's faith in people named Stew.
So the idea that boxing great Marvin Hagler died after getting a COVID-19 vaccine didn't come from any solid reporting that Alex is working off of.
He's taking that information from a random Facebook post by another boxer.
Hagler's wife Kay has come out and been clear that this is not the case and that he passed away from natural causes.
I can't determine whether or not Hagler had been vaccinated, and if he had, I have no idea when he would have gotten the vaccine.
My point here is that I really want to demonstrate the flimsy level of information Alex works with.
He has absolutely zero evidence past that Facebook post that Hagler's death is related to a vaccination, and that's sufficient for him to report it definitively.
No one interested in getting the story right could possibly use that as a workflow.
Also, there's been no evidence found that suggests that Hank Aaron's death was related to getting vaccinated two weeks prior.
He was 86 years old, so who knows what the case is there.
I'm very honored to be back in studio with all of you.
I had an amazingly powerful trip.
In Florida that I'm not at liberty to get into any of on, basically, but I will give you just some of the basics of how exciting things are, the major resistance forming, and also a sense of what this broadcast has done and what this broadcast has been able to do.
But at this point, that is probably too much to ask the narcissistic hacks who have hijacked the soul of American music.
The real awards show would have gotten massive ratings if Grammy-winning legends Bobby Rush, Toots in the My Towels, John Prine, Chick Corea, and many others had been given a moment to receive their awards, some of them posthumously.
But I was also listening to this, and there was a really, like, there was a part in his report that made me, like, really think, I think he's trolling.
All overseen by the self-proclaimed king and queen of Crowley and Magic, Beyonce and Jay-Z.
Why has it come to this, you may ask?
Because the potential of infinite freedom real American music represents must never be allowed out of its box, which is buried beneath the Grammy stage.
Opening that box would spread truth far and wide to a populace that is craving it.
Oh, you're not going to see the big corporate-produced establishment program talking about why are all of these old people and young people and black people and white people and others dying?
From the mRNA vaccines.
Oh no, you're not going to hear about all of these baseball players and famous boxers, heavyweight champion of the world, marvelous Marvin Hagler dying a day after he took the shot.
His family said that's what killed him.
Totally healthy, took it, dead 24 hours later, his liver dissolved.
So Alex is reporting that Hagler's family has said that the death was related to the vaccine, and I would like to officially challenge him to back that claim up.
The only statement I can find from his family is from his wife, who said, quote, For sure wasn't the vaccine that caused his death.
My baby left in peace with his usual smile, and now is not the time to talk nonsense.
Alex needs to back up his claim, or else he needs to retract this slanderous bit of business and apologize to the Hagler family.
Their pain is not a prop for him to use to push anti-vaccination.
Anyway, Alex gets back to his Florida trip, and here is where I started to get a sense of what might And I went to Florida and met with the who's who's that are there.
And I could also believe that he wants people to think that, and he just hung out with Roger at a grocery store, and now is pretending that Trump anointed him leader.
The most prominent names in the country fighting the globalists all ask me the same question.
How did you know all that?
I said, well, I went off globalist documents, but yeah, there's a lot of documents.
And I said, no, but I know the key groups and their key plan, and I've seen what they've built so far, and I see the predictive programming in the news, so I know what they're going to do.
And they said, well, you certainly do know that.
You know, I met with the former head of two U.S. intelligence agencies.
I'll leave it at that.
I met with a lot of other very prominent people.
And I just, it was a form of satisfaction I'm not experienced.
It was like a thousand pound weight was taken off my shoulders.
There's still a lot of weight on my shoulders, but I've had this mission and I've known it was my job for this time.
We're now in to do what we've done.
And I told you that for 20 plus years.
I said, this is all going to come.
It's my mission to get it out up front so that others can then carry the ball.
And I just literally had like a vision.
But it was beyond a vision, not like where I saw a hallucination and an angel appeared or God appeared.
It was more of like a download, like you will do this, this will then happen, this will then unfold, and then this next operation will unfold.
And now I know that I am inspired with my discernment and my own research to know what to look at, to know what to understand, and that my understanding of human nature and how to fight the globalist was dead on, but that was all given to me by God.
The smartest thing Rush Limbaugh said was, Talent on loan from God.
And so I just am very humbled to be here, very humbled, very thankful to be with all of you.
I come in here and research all this information and get very frustrated on air because it's very hard to have time to get to all of it properly.
Yeah, there were two John Bowne special reports, because he needed to fix his earpiece.
That was what was going on.
And then he rambled a bunch about how he was anointed the King of the Patriots when he was hanging out in Florida.
So it's fucking brazen for Alex to complain at this point that he doesn't have time to get to the real meat and cover it properly.
He has all the time in the world.
He just knows full well that if he ever tried to go anywhere deeper than surface level on any of these stories he covers, it would become clear immediately that he has no idea what he's talking about and his arguments make no sense.
And his audience will put up with him just rambling about God giving him a download or whatever about what his career is going to be when everything is a direct contradiction.
It's not like it's not like 20 years ago.
God told him one day you will be a foot soldier in Donald Trump.
If Alex had some kind of a download of what he was going to do and some kind of an idea of his future, then he couldn't have possibly known anything past...
Supporting Trump because this whole time has been so a vast departure from...
Also, I'm struggling to believe that you want to follow top names in anti-globalism who are willing to take you at face value when they say, how do you know everything you know?
I mean, like, honestly, as somebody who listens to a ton of Alex, I mean, like, one of our episodes that people like a lot was the episode, the Drunk Hotel interview.
Could be the guy who runs that fucking grocery store.
I don't know.
It's very weird.
All I hear is whenever Alex talks about this idea that the weight is lifted from him, it's just like someone patted you on the head and you feel really good about it.
I'm glad you had a great trip, but you still, I mean, everything, it still sucks.
Yeah, and that's why he's down right now, is because he's coming off the high of being like, I'm so great, and now he's in a bad mood, so he's telling you how great he is.
So Alex finally stops talking about his own dumbass and starts talking about some issues, and he gets into a little bit of stuff about climate change, and I found this Fascinating.
And I'm sure you've all heard me, a regular listener, probably 5,000 times say, when they collapse the third world with the lockdowns and the giant third world masses flood us, they're going to say that that was because of climate change, even though the lockdown's what did it.
Sure as hell, Nancy Pelosi came out and said it.
And I said they're also going to say that...
The new viruses are rising because of climate change, and that's why they're developing, because there's too many people.
So see, they always criticize Pat Robertson when there's a bad hurricane, and this is God judging us.
Well, maybe he's wrong, maybe he's right.
But they're saying, oh, humans are bad.
That's why there's a snowstorm or a dust storm or climate change caused a volcano.
Long before COVID was known to anyone, there were many people discussing the dynamic that when climates change, it makes some regions uninhabitable, or at least it can, whether by the risk of rising sea levels, diminishing water supply, or some other variable shifting.
This leads inevitably to some degree of displacement of people, the extent of which is, you know, left to be seen.
Second, when people discuss climate change causing new diseases, they're talking about how changing climate displaces animals as well.
And, as that happens, animals who previously would not have been in contact with humans end up contacting humans, and in those cases, there's a possibility for transmission of novel diseases.
There's also the matter of rising sea temperatures, making water more hospitable for things like flesh-eating bacteria, but all of it is a discussion surrounding cause-and-effect relationships.
Not every new interaction between an animal and a human is going to result in a new disease, but the more that it does happen, the more possibilities there are for new diseases popping up.
This is something that I guess Alex is conflating with Pat Robertson saying that natural disasters are God's punishment for the U.S. accepting LGBTQ folk as humans with rights.
In 2015, Pat Robertson said that a drop in the Dow Jones Industrial Average was God punishing the Obama administration for supporting access to reproductive health care.
There's an important difference between these two things that Alex is embarrassingly not understanding, and that is that one is moralistic and the other is descriptive.
The conversation about climate change can be something that you can discuss with moral implications, but it can also be a conversation that you have strictly as a matter of X will cause Y, and it still makes sense.
Robertson's claims are things that only work as a moral argument, a dumb and flimsy one, but they can't possibly be taken seriously in any other context.
There's no way to coherently explain how Planned Parenthood existing causes hurricanes, except if you embrace the worldview that we're living at the whim of a vengeful god who's decided that reproductive health care is immoral and the punishment for immorality is a hurricane.
That's the only way that Robertson's shit even makes sense from a grammar standpoint, but the same is not true for the conversations that people have about the side effects of climate change.
It's really amazing to see this kind of equivalence being made and realize that there's actually, you know, it's probably how Alex's brain works.
These two things probably do feel about the same to him.
He just thinks that Robertson's claims are closer to reality.
And we've talked about this before, but we exist in multiple different...
Time periods simultaneously.
Like, it's weird to understand the main factors of climate change and how they swirl around in a global sense, which is...
Incredible.
In such a short period of time, too, like relatively speaking, we've gone from believing that witches cause all of our problems to understanding what those problems come from on a scientific and real level.
And at the same time, people still believe that witches cause our problems.
And the sort of hinge point of it is Alex seems to think that the conversations about these potential new diseases that we will come in contact with as animals get displaced, as climates change, is something that is intrinsically about humans being bad.
And that's not at all a meaningful conversation that I've heard anyone having, except Alex.
It's a straw man in order for him to make this somehow an equivalent of Pat Robertson saying gay people cause hurricanes.
So Infowars quotes Acting Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Troy Miller as saying the following during a media call on March 10th.
Quote, we're seeing a dramatic increase in fentanyl seizures this fiscal year, more than 360% higher than this time last year.
Now here's a fun game.
And this is why disinformation is almost impossible to get rid of, ever.
Alex can use that to argue that there's so much more fentanyl coming into the country than when Trump was president because Biden has signaled to the cartels that it's open season.
Of course, this doesn't really explain why the police are seizing all of it, but who cares?
Now, imagine that Miller, the acting Customs and Border Protection commissioner, what if he had reported that seizures were way down from last year?
What do you imagine Alex's narrative would be at that point?
So the actual facts or information that come out don't matter in cases like this.
The argument is that Trump's approach to the border was good and Biden's is bad.
So no matter what details get provided, they get filtered through that lens and the predetermined argument is made.
That's all that's going on.
As for Biden's advisor admitting that Trump's policies work, Alex is just reading an Infowars headline that fails to capture the real story.
This was about the Southern Border Coordinator Roberta Jacobson discussing how there may be a relationship between the ending of Trump's inhumane policies and a spike in people heading towards the border.
Quote, there was a hope for a more humane policy after four years of pent-up demand, so I don't know if I would call that a coincidence.
But the idea that a more humane policy would be in place may have driven people to make that decision, but perhaps more importantly, it definitely drove smugglers to express disinformation, spread disinformation, about what was now possible.
This is not what Alex is reporting, because it's just a little bit deeper than the surface appearance level, and he can't really handle that kind of material.
So, it's entirely possible that people were like, oh, the president doesn't actively want to murder us, so maybe now would be a better time than it was a couple months ago.
And as long as we don't give up, they're going to run out of time.
They're going to fall apart.
And no matter how much propaganda or election fraud they've got, everybody's going to know you run from Democrats, you run from communists, you run from socialists, you run from leftists, you run from liberals, because they're monsters.
They're part of a criminal syndicate.
And most of the people that serve the left are idiots being used and destroyed themselves.
Alex's branding in his earlier career really relied on him pretending to not be extremely right-wing.
He was making arguments that were straight out of the John Birch Society and putting forward ideas that were far to the right of the GOP in the 90s, so in order to mask that and expand his potential audience beyond the weirdo militia people, he had to lie.
The essential lie of his career is that he's above the party system and that he's opposed to Democrats and Republicans equally.
He's not, and he's never been.
He likes extremists and only the Republican sort.
When liberal-leaning people got tricked into thinking that he was just an iconoclast, truth-telling kind of guy, what they were actually being tricked into is supporting his right-wing extremist ideology, though they thought that they were being sold as just an alliance against the man.
This was done because on its face, Alex's shit is weak and dumb, and people would see right through it and reject it if it was delivered in any way other than in a Trojan horse.
As for that thing about the Pentagon at the end there, Alex is just covering something Tucker Carlson is whining about.
On his show last week on Tuesday, Tucker went on a little jag about how the military is too feminine, and considering the needs of soldiers who may not be male is, quote, a mockery of the U.S. military.
So naturally, a lot of folks in the services were offended by these comments and spoke out about it.
Speaking to reporters, Pentagon spokesman John Kirby expressed revulsion with Tucker's comments, and as reported by CNN, quote, said the military still had a lot of work to do to become more inclusive, more respectful of everyone, especially women.
We pledge to do better and we will.
What we absolutely won't do is take personnel advice from a talk show host or the Chinese military.
Maybe those folks feel like they have something to prove that's on them.
Tucker went on his show and whined about how the Pentagon was attacking him, and it's an outrage.
Now Alex is reporting on Tucker's whining.
This is a game for people like Alex and Tucker.
They say something that they know is offensive and demeaning, then people respond that what they said was offensive and demeaning, and then they pretend that they're victims of being oppressed by people expressing that what they said sucks.
Yeah, it's a clunkier version of the exact same word as dystopian, since both are adjectives that connote something being similar to a dystopia.
You can find some really interesting debate among amateur linguists on message boards about whether or not you should ever use dystopic instead of dystopian, and the general consensus is that there's no real good reason to.
But also, who cares?
Alex did not come up with this word.
The earliest appearance of the word in Google's archive of printed works appears to be in 1903.
But interestingly, the frequency of its use jumps after the 1960s.
I found an interesting article on the website Daily Writing Tips that offers a potential theory for why Alex has this as his preferred word or a word that's in his head.
The author of this site was discussing how they use the word dystopic and then wondered if it was actually a word.
Quote, I think my use of it in an article may stem from frequent reading of film criticism.
They then go on to give some examples of instances where the word is used generally in the discussion of pop culture science fiction.
I suspect Alex is so entrenched in and so influenced by pop culture science fiction and thinking that it's real that he's probably encountered the word dystopic in that context quite a bit and now I guess he just thinks he coined the term.
Whether my theory is right or not, this is just some embarrassing time wasting that Alex is engaging in here.
I think it's okay to be skeptical about a vaccine that was developed as quickly as these ones were.
That's fine.
When you find yourself feeling skeptical, the appropriate thing to do is to look into the source of your skepticism and see if you can resolve that skepticism.
Chronic skepticism isn't really healthy, and whenever possible, you should transfer your skepticism in the direction of finding a concrete position if you can.
This is the kind of sleight of hand that Alex likes to use a lot.
When he's actually advancing a pointlessly and aggressively anti-vax position, he hides behind the illusion that he's just being skeptical.
Is it so bad to be skeptical?
When he's pushing narratives to his audience about how various victims of gun violence are actors and the whole events were staged as an excuse to take his guns, he's actually telling his audience that.
But when he gets called on it, he hides behind the illusion that he's just asking questions and examining things from all sides.
What's so wrong with asking questions?
Alex does this because on some level, he knows that his bullshit doesn't stand up to adult scrutiny, so the only way for it to fly at all is for him to preemptively give up on his own narratives as opposed to be forced to defend them.
It's easy to criticize him, but it's very hard to criticize being skeptical or asking questions about interesting topics, and that's why he plays the game that he does.
Alex is lying about Marvin Hagler, and he doesn't even have the conspiracy timeline of Hank Aaron's death right.
Now, as for that other issue in Germany, they are just temporarily halting the rollout of the AstraZeneca vaccine, quote, over a small number of blood clot concerns.
There weren't people in Germany who ended up with blood clots, but there were a couple cases reported in Denmark and Norway, so Germany decided to halt things as a precaution.
There have been 37 reported cases of blood clots in the population of over 17 million people in the world who have received the AstraZeneca vaccine, and according to the company, quote, there is no evidence the vaccine carries an increased risk of clots.
It's entirely possible that that number of people out of 17 million would have gotten them anyway.
Italy halted the use of the vaccine as well, quote, as a precaution and temporarily after there was concerns that one man in the country died after getting the shot.
But it's not clear that the death is related to the vaccine.
This is all just countries being hypercautious about the vaccine rollout, and it isn't any evidence that it's killing anyone or everyone or the vaccine's dangerous.
When I brought up Alex's fake and false skepticism, it's important to realize that these are the first three stories that he comes up with to justify that skepticism about the vaccine.
This is bad work, and it's the level of shit that he's bringing to the table.
It would be wise for everyone to recognize that Alex has not succeeded in justifying his skeptical position here.
His opposition to the vaccine doesn't rest on facts and reality.
Yeah, I was thinking about why it is, you know, like, this vaccine was developed so fast, and I think part of the reason that we are skeptical about it is because it's almost utopic.
Yeah, and I don't think that being taken aback by the circumstances of the world, particularly the last year has been so insane and adjustments are so complicated and difficult that people have had to make, that I think that you can have a reaction that is in some way skeptical, whether it's worry, anxiety-based, awe-based, whatever it is.
But you do have resources that you can go to explore that skepticism and resolve it.
And if you behave like that.
like Alex does and throw out stupid headlines that mean nothing and don't take into context the actual circumstances, then what you're going to do is you're going to end up staying in that skeptical place or retreating into a dumb position that was where Alex wanted It's not healthy.
It's also a little hard to believe that we can manufacture a vaccine so quickly at the same time as half of Republican men believe in witches causing our problems.
But that was what Al Gore said was going to happen while he bought oceanfront property 20 years ago and while Bill Clinton bought oceanfront property 30 years ago and while Obama bought oceanfront property 10 years ago.
And, of course, the seas aren't going up.
It's all lies.
They show you a polar bear with its cub on an ice floe and go, look, they're dying.
The illustration that that classic picture of a polar bear and cub on an ice flow is not so much that they can't swim.
It's that when the ice recedes, the polar bear loses its ability to hunt.
Polar bears don't just hunt swimming around in the water.
They hunt from the edge of ice protruding into water where they can catch fish.
As ice disappears or becomes less stable, they have to cross longer distances or be left to try and fish on the shore, which is a less fish-plentiful area.
The result of this is that we're likely to see collapsing polar bear populations in the not too distant future if ice continues to disappear.
Alex has one image that he thinks he can mock that's a counterpoint to all climate change arguments, but in reality it's a straw man he's built so he can win a fake argument.
As for people buying oceanfront property, I don't know if they did or did not do that, but if they did, who cares?
Not all property near the ocean is intrinsically at high risk due to rising sea levels.
None of this means anything.
It's nonsense.
Also, one big problem with Alex's idea about Avatar being pre-programming to wear masks.
Humans don't have to wear masks on Earth in that movie.
They wear masks on Pandora because they can't breathe the air on that planet.
I think this might be convenience for Alex that he found a scene in a movie where some people had face masks on, and he just decided this is predictive programming and decided to ignore the rest of it.
So Alex gets to taking some calls here at the end of this episode here on the 15th, and this one caller that he takes, he talks to him for a very long time, and there's some very serious problems with what he's bringing to the table.
There's no way that his patients could be dying after getting the AstraZeneca vaccine because that vaccine is not approved for use in the United States.
It's still in phase three clinical trials, and though the U.S. has purchased a lot of doses of the vaccine, it's not looking like they're going to be able to get approval to begin using them until spring.
It's pretty embarrassing for Alex to not even know what vaccines are approved for use in the United States, but for this alleged doctor to get that very critical detail wrong, that's fucking disqualifying.
Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars is a completely fraudulent document that was pushed by Bill Cooper in his book Behold a Pale Horse.
We covered it in great detail on episode 381 of our show, so if you'd like to hear more about why that's bullshit and why it's embarrassing for Alex to be referencing it as a real Pentagon document, then go ahead, give that episode a spin.
The article that Alex is referring to, looking forward to the end of humanity, that doesn't discuss how great it'll be when humanity isn't around.
It's an easy misrepresentation to make of the headline, but the text of the editorial article doesn't say what Alex is telling his audience it does.
The essential game that Alex plays is to make really scary claims that attempt to defend them by pointing to evidence that might appear to support the argument, but is actually misrepresented or a completely fake thing.
You could sum up most of his career just with that one sentence.
Okay, I gotta stop right there, just because, like, I'm listening to this, and I'm like, Irishman1776 wrote this, and you're sending it to, like, your contacts in the media?
But first, just long and short of this, Politico isn't celebrating infertility in the end of people being able to reproduce.
They had an interview with a doctor who is theorizing that we are running into fertility problems in the next couple decades because of some chemicals.
And the answer to that, I guess, would probably be regulation of business or industry byproducts.
So, the problem with assigning these kinds of things like Alex is doing to anonymous screen names is, I have no idea who Irishman1776 is, and I don't know if he's the same person who uses that screen name on Reddit.
If he is, then he posted this message two years ago in an Oklahoma-based Reddit board.
Quote, I'm 22 and I'm trying to lose my virginity.
Ladies, hit me up.
Obviously, you need to be 18 or older.
Aside from that, I don't care about age.
I don't care about race or looks.
I don't care about your marital status.
No idea if that's the same guy or if he ended up losing that virginity, but you can see the problem here.
It's kind of silly to base your reporting on anonymous internet comments.
Also, this is really funny to see Alex trying to get this comment on his website sent out to people like Tucker Carlson and make it into a chain email that your grandparents could send to you.
Because the user, the 1776 Irishman, didn't write it.
If you Google the text of this post, you will find that Irishman1776 is just reposting a meme that I can find being posted on Facebook as early as at least January 31st.
I looked around a little more and I found the exact text of the Irishman's comment being tweeted out by an Indian actress named Pooja Bedi on January 15th.
There's a number of responses to her tweet indicating that this was a message that had been circulating previously on WhatsApp and Puja had just copied and pasted it from there.
This is an old anti-vax meme that Alex didn't bother to look into and is pretending is the work of some sagely analysis that one of his anonymous viewers conducted.
This is outrageously sad, whether or not this is the same guy trying to get laid on Reddit.
Yeah, I think I want to reach back to something he said on the previous episode, which is that many people on the left are just useful idiots who are destroying their lives.
I think about something he said on the previous episode, and that is that all the bigwigs and the higher-ups and the anti-globalist world are like, Alex, you're such a genius.
I can't believe that you're in communication with Irishman1776.
One of my favorite things in the world is things that are so important that Alex will reference them but have to resist getting into them until tomorrow.
So, in fairness, Crimson Contagion was a real thing.
It was a series of exercises undertaken by the Trump Department of Health and Human Services which took place between January and August 2019.
The New York Times reported on the exercises last March in a conversation about how dreadfully Trump and his administration dropped the ball in terms of dealing with the novel coronavirus.
There was a report that was completed This report, based on an exercise testing response to a novel influenza outbreak, is full of lessons we learned after the coronavirus outbreak.
Things like, quote, The current medical countermeasure supply chain and production capacity cannot meet the demands imposed by nations during global influenza pandemic.
So this report also highlighted that exercise participants were confused about which organizations, Oh, boy.
sure fucking was everybody whenever the federal government decided to kill us all this document is a really huge problem for someone like alex because it basically demonstrates that the trump health and human services department was asleep at the wheel when it came to implementing the changes recommended by this exercise they did this study that revealed things that were clearly a problem then trump did nothing and the public paid for it yep That's basically it.
This exercise is a strong indicator that had Trump run an efficient, effective, and competent government, we could have avoided so much of the pain and misery that's come from COVID-19.
This is something that was reported on over a year ago in the mainstream media, but I guess Alex just heard about it, so he's got to come out and do some spin.
Because it so clearly shows that Trump's government had every reason to be aware of where some of the difficulties would be in the case of a pandemic, Alex has to make this exercise itself part of the globalist conspiracy and the plot.
Alex claims to be tomorrow's news today, but in reality, his last year's spin being half-assed tomorrow.
One thing that is a little bit fucking me up about how we deal with this is we do talk a lot about, rightfully, all of the people that the Trump administration has sentenced to death.
All of the people that have been crippled by the response.
And at the same time, we don't talk about...
It's also their fault that we were trapped inside for a fucking year.
I'm not here to go to bed for Zbigniew Brzezinski or any of, like, I'm not defending any specifics about his foreign policy, but I'm looking at this claim that Alex is making.
And the quote is real.
I mean, part of the quote is real.
There's a short clip of him that gets passed around a lot where he says, quote, In earlier times, it was easier to control a million people.
Literally, it was easier to control a million people than physically to kill a million people.
Today, it's infinitely easier to kill a million people than to control a million people.
It was hard to find a full transcript of the speech or any concrete citations of what else was said, and I'm certain from the jump that Alex is making all this shit up.
What Brzezinski is saying here is kind of just true.
Like, weapons development have been such over the past hundred years that it's technically easier to kill a million people than it is to control them.
That's descriptively accurate.
I can see no indication from that clip that gets passed around that he's saying that it's good to control or kill people.
It's where the disagreement with Alex comes in.
It doesn't seem like this has any moral indications.
So this quote comes from a November 17, 2008 speech at the Chatham House.
The rest of the clip that goes around that you can find has to do with the fact that there was a political awakening happening around the world.
So I found it interesting that when I was looking around, the next thing I found was a December 16, 2008 op-ed that Brzezinski had published in the New York Times titled, quote, The Global Political Awakening.
The article is basically making the argument that the U.S.'s leadership role in the world was severely tarnished by things like the Iraq War, and Obama was coming into office with a very serious need to recover international legitimacy.
The issue that compounded things was that countries like China, Japan, and India were taking a more prominent role in the global stage.
Brzezinski had this to say.
Quote, The only alternative to a constructive American role is global chaos.
The New York Times op-ed was an incomplete text of the speech, but the full version was published in the January 2009 edition of the journal International Affairs.
If you read the In its full context, in the actual article, what Brzezinski is talking about is the ending of American colonialism, the need for which is demonstrated by the Iraq War.
These major world powers, new and old, also face a novel reality.
While the lethality of their military might is greater than ever, their capacity to impose control over the politically awakened masses of the world is at a historic low.
To put it bluntly, in earlier times it was easier to control one million people than to physically kill one million people.
Today, it's infinitely easier to kill one million people than to control one million people.
That insight bears directly on the use of force, particularly by societies that are culturally alien, even if technologically superior.
As a result, in the current post-colonial era, it is too costly to undertake colonial wars.
That is a reality some recent American policymakers failed to assimilate to America's detriment.
It's very clear that the context of what he's saying has to do with the gaffes.
To pretend that Zbigniew Brzezinski, in that article, or in that speech, which is just a transcript of the article, I'm sorry, a transcript of the speech, to pretend that what he's saying is, it used to be easier to control a million people than it was to kill them.
Now it's easier to kill them, so we should just kill them.
And also, Zbigniew Brzezinski had some ideas that you should take issue with.
But it's going to be difficult for you to wrestle with some of the interconnected realities that Zbigniew Brzezinski was dealing with that Alex is pretending don't exist.
And so I looked that guy up, and apparently there's like a broadcaster in the UK who got in trouble for making some offensive comments about Black Lives Matter.
Okay, we are legalizing crime in the United States of America and villainizing anybody who expects the protection of the police, anybody who backs or supports law enforcement, and anybody who just wants to get up every day and enjoy the sanctity of a nice, quiet neighborhood and go to work.
If you are a white, God-fearing, patriotic, Christian, conservative specifically, you are destined for the gulags.
You're going to hell, period.
You're the criminal, and you should watch your six because there is not anybody at the higher ranks of law enforcement or the government that truly has your back.
All these institutions that we were raised, Alex, trying to be taught, these are the people that we can trust, are exactly the ones that are coming after you.
And so when I hear him, you know, bring up something like straight, God-fearing, white conservatives are heading for a gulag, I'm like, I gotta go, man.
I can't stand these people because this is the type of shit where you're like, One, in a certain sense, this is a benchmark of the progress of the conservative right.
Because you could grab that exact dude, put him in the 60s, and he'd say the exact same shit, but he'd be more explicit.
Take him, put him in the 30s, he'd be saying the exact same shit.
Well, you know, I don't have exact up-to-date numbers.
Here's what I do have.
And, you know, I only stopped chasing fugitives just weeks ago after 18 years of doing this.
And so it was my job, you know, in writing and staying proficient in these numbers to understand what's really going on in every single community that we serve.
Because regardless of whether or not we're cops, we're doing a job where we're arresting people, taking people to jail.
And it's a very real probability I've been shot at.
I mainly deal with people of color, with black folks.
and I don't know why that is, but that's what the facts are.
And the facts are that last year, when we look at the cops and the black people and this big theory of systemic racism, and I'm looking at it right here, nine unarmed black people were killed by cops last year.
Nine.
Nineteen.
White unarmed people were killed by cops last year.
More officers are killed every single year than unarmed blacks.
So the question is, when does the Blue Lives Matter?
So I can sort this out for Stu really fast if he's actually interested.
The reason more cops are shot each year than unarmed black people is because they're cops, and the job comes with a heightened likelihood of encountering criminals with guns.
It's not good that cops are shot, but it's also an understandable aspect of that line of work, an element that they don't share with people who happen to be black and unarmed.
As for the discrepancy between 9 unarmed black people and 19 unarmed white people being killed by cops last year, this is another one that's really super easy to sort out.
I have no idea if his numbers are even accurate, but let's assume for the sake of argument that they are, because that's what he's bringing to the table.
According to the U.S. census data, in 2019, the most recent numbers that he could find, the U.S. population is 60.1% white and 12.5% black.
Assuming Stu's numbers are correct, even though there are more total white people who are shot by cops, it's still wildly disproportionate when viewed in terms of the population sizes.
If the country were 50% white and 50% black, then his numbers might mean something, but the demographics don't look like that, and his numbers are nothing more than props that he's using to mask the We should care about police killing people, regardless of other variables involved.
But even Stu's own numbers illustrate that there's a much higher likelihood of an unarmed black person being killed by police than an unarmed white person.
Basically, this clip is a perfect encapsulation about how I feel about Stu Peters.
He's either too stupid to know that the stats he's using are meaningless, or he understands exactly what he's doing and he's trying to minimize issues related to race and policing.
If he's this sloppy with something like that...
That in theory has something to do with his primary field of expertise since he was a bounty hunter.
If he's that sloppy there, I'm not going to listen to him on any topic that he's not conceivably an expert in.
I don't want to know what this guy thinks about COVID-19.
He has a story about a guy who has an interesting perspective.
I don't fully understand it myself, and it would be kind of silly for me to try to pontificate about it.
But he is a guy who's trying to make an argument that...
A vaccine, it works on individual levels, but there may be some negative consequences from applying them broadly across the population when there's already an outbreak.
As I understand, that's the argument that he's putting forth.
Of course, all the things that you've been talking about and your guest, Alex, which is boost your immune function, make sure you have good nutrition, get plenty of rest, and avoid vaccinated people.
Because they are the virus shedders.
They are the mutant factories.
And then get educated and try to educate the people around you so that they learn before they run over and try to get vaccinated.
Because if you vaccinate yourself as an ignorant, uninformed person, you are sacrificing your life.
I think the idea that he's trying to put forth is that people who get vaccinated will end up causing mutations of the virus, and then they will give you...
But I think that the function of this narrative, in terms of the larger sphere of Infowars talking points, is I think that they recognize that, historically, we've seen outbreaks of...
vaccine preventable conditions in non-vaccinated communities.
A lot of times anti-vax clusters Sure.
End up having a resurgence of things that are preventable.
They're going to push the mass panic in the second wave.
And then say that this justifies gunpoint vaccinations.
So at that point, they will be able to have the political power to unleash now the woke military to go door-to-door in cities across America, confiscating your guns and vaccinating you at gunpoint.
All the things we just mentioned, take care of your immune system, take care of your health, avoid the vaccine at all costs, and avoid other people who are vaccinated.
Secondly, we've got to continue to build out our independent platforms like you have done, like I'm doing.
We've got to continue to expand our reach.
You know, the mainstream media is collapsing in terms of its viewership, and yet more and more people are viewing independent truth media, even though the censorship has never been worse.
But we are winning.
To those people who are willing to live.
Those who want to commit suicide and die, we can't help them any longer.
Pray for them, wish them the best, but wave goodbye to those people because many of those people, millions or even hundreds of millions may die.
But for the survivors, educate, inform, and connect.
And that's how we can rebuild society after this vaccine holocaust is unleashed upon our world.
And that's what it is, Alex.
It's a vaccine holocaust that will kill maybe a thousand times.
They're butchering the Bill of Rights and Constitution.
They're purging the military.
Biden says he's going to confiscate the guns.
They're coming out with forced inoculations.
The borders are wide open.
Yes, by any historical yardstick, we have every right to declare 1776 Part 2. I just instinctively look at that and realize how they've set this up politically.
And how they want a civil war so China can take over, and I'm really trying to get the governors and the political system moving to stop this.
You may be right that there's no way to fix it, or is there a way to fix it?
Because, you know, they're claiming you want violence, they're claiming you want offensive stuff.
That's not the man I know.
But at the same time, if we're attacked, we have a right and a duty to protect ourselves.
So we far pass the Declaration of Independence point.
Nobody can deny that.
There's plenty of cowards in the government that are going to keep appeasing the system forever.
But there is a point at which the globalists are going to push where there is a breaking point.
I don't want that breaking point, but it is approaching.
unidentified
Well, we're now on the same path the founders walked, and we need to look at their wisdom and do the same thing they did.
Well, I mean, that clip of Alex was just multiple times saying we have every justification for starting a revolutionary war, but I like talking to governors.
But yeah, it's just justifications for why a revolutionary war and offensive violence could be set off, which isn't actually offensive, it's defensive.
But if you're Stuart Rhodes, how the fuck do we even respond to that?
Their murder fantasies have gone so far from the original ones that we used to listen to where they're like, if somebody tried to kill my family, I'd get to shoot them a bunch of times, which I don't want to do.