Today, Dan and Jordan prepare to dismount from Alex Jones's 2020 content. In this installment, Alex lies about Covid-19 a bunch, discusses his feelings about Wonder Woman 1984, and is visited by a pair of Journalist Babies.
My new favorite pastime now is catching them in some sort of pose, taking a picture and then marking it up on my phone, and just drawing a fanciful little picture around it.
So, this report that Alex is citing that Trump tweeted out is not what you would call a report.
That term's being used real loosely.
In reality, it's a video about how the election was stolen, created by a guy named Seth Holhouse, who runs a website called Man in America.
I wanted to learn a little bit more about this guy, so I went to his website and I noticed a few things that I thought were interesting.
Two big things popped up about his URL, which is mia.news.
All right.
The other thing that popped up was this guy had a.news URL, and pretty much the only people I've ever seen getting.news pages are Infowars Associates.
I'm sure some other people are doing it too, but it's become something I associate so much with Alex and his crew that I instinctively...
Yeah.
100.
It might have been slightly unexpected that this video went as viral as it did after Trump tweeted it out, because according to an article by Will Sommer in the Daily Beast, some interesting things started to happen recently.
In particular, it appears that references online to Whole House being a member of the Falun Gong movement began to be erased, including a mention of his appearance at a 2007 Minnesota conference on the website Clear Harmony, and all mentions of him on mingwhai.org.
This is not an individual who made a news report that's super powerful.
It's the product of a longtime employee of a deeply right-wing...
Propaganda media outlet that essentially deifies Trump.
The removal of Whole House's name from those websites is kind of telling, and the most likely explanation for why it happened is because the propaganda video featured him as the narrator, and it doesn't work nearly as well as if you know that he's the member of a spiritual movement that reportedly views Trump as a critical ally in the coming Judgment Day where communists will be sent to hell.
This kind of reminds me of that advertising dude who created the Frank Bates persona to sell survival food and prepper supplies to conservatives because he knew that the pitch would sound more attractive coming from a normal, everyday kind of fellow like Frank, even though he didn't exist, compared to the reality of it being a...
You know, just bullshit, being resold to them by an affiliate marketing billionaire who lives like in New York.
Anyway, I bring this up to remind everyone that Alex Jones considers this a news report.
What he's doing is just desperately chasing the actual new alternative propaganda media.
Folks with associations with like Epoch Times or OAN and Newsmax until like a week or two ago when they admitted that Biden won the election.
It appears that Alex really didn't want to work on this episode because other than introducing that special report, he doesn't get back into the studio until 20 minutes into the episode.
I can tell that he's going to be mad at callers if they're mad at Trump about it, though.
I can tell that for sure.
They're just trying to get Twitter brownie points, man.
Another thing that I was struck by listening to this is, like, we're almost 30 minutes into the show, and granted, Alex wasn't on air for most of it, but one of the lead stories isn't the Christmas morning bombing in Nashville that he interrupted his holiday to declare an almost certain false flag.
Shouldn't there be a follow-up on that?
Like, Owen hosted the show on Sunday, so Alex didn't cover it then, so it seems like now would be a good time to do this a little bit more responsibly.
This is just kind of sad, because just imagine, as anti-Bush as Alex pretends to be, just imagine him arguing in support of Al Gore squatting in the White House because the 2000 election was stolen.
Earlier in this episode, Alex said that even if Trump was a horrible bad guy, the election was still stolen from him, so we have a responsibility to fight to overturn it.
I know that he said that the 2000 election was fraudulent, but somehow I just can't imagine him working up this passion to support Bill Clinton's vice president getting into office.
We elected President Trump in one way or another, either by overturning the election and showing it's a fraud and getting Congress to act on January 6th and not certify it for Biden, or whether we end up impeaching Joe Biden or getting him arrested as a CHICOM agent, one way or another he will be removed.
And that's what I said in my speech a few weeks ago in D.C. that made national headlines claiming I said, kill Joe Biden.
Really, why haven't I been arrested?
Because that's not what I said.
The Secret Service hasn't called me.
The last thing I want is for Joe Biden to get assassinated.
That's how they can turn lemons into lemonade.
That's how they can make that guy a victim and a good guy when he's a bad guy.
Then we'll have Kamala Harris, probably worse.
The Secret Service knows I'm on record.
Not once, not twice, but three times getting crazy people arrested who were actually stockpiling weapons and planning to kill presidents.
These crazies have sent us letters and called us before and said, I'm going to kill George W. Bush.
I'm going to kill Obama.
You know what I do?
I pick the phone up and I call the Secret Service.
If we said, hey, some people said we're going to kill the president, we called the FBI and they got taken care of, people would be like, yeah, good job!
You know, I'm sure Joel would have made time to talk about this possibly being a false flag, but he had more important things to do, like tell you you've got to live an hour outside of town if you want to survive.
That sounds like when I was six and my friends and I were building a snow fort and we drew up, like, there's going to be parapets here and there's going to be turrets and we're going to make sure that there's going to be murder holes.
And I found that two pardons went to John Tate and Jesse Benton, the two Ron Paul campaign members who tried to bribe an Iowa State rep to switch his endorsement from Bachman to Ron Paul back in 2012.
You might think that Alex would support both of those pardons because he's excusing the crimes of people who are on the same side as Alex, but you'd be wrong.
Alex hates Jesse Benton.
He's indicated in the past that he feels like Benton has worked to keep him on the outside of things, and...
That Benton weaseled his way into the Patriot movement by marrying Ron Paul's granddaughter.
But something like that does give a real middle finger to the idea that anyone in the rest of the world would treat us like we're operating from any kind of place of good faith.
I think it was interesting the first time we watched it, because the juxtaposition of a gruff, ostensible newsman just being like, and Watchmen's stupid, is very funny.
And now we're on movie 300 of him being a child, and you're like, alright.
I kind of just get the sense that he was overwhelmed by the visuals and stuff and didn't understand the movie, and so he decided to call it Brainwashing.
The whole theme is, there's an end-of-world event coming.
And we're the ones making it happen because we want too much, because of our desires.
We've got to give our will over to something else to stop it.
But it tricks you.
Your will has been given over to this Antichrist character, but then you've got to denounce him but give your will to another collective that is the goddess Diana.
But you've still given your will over.
And men are bad.
Women are going to lead us out of this.
And that's what the Carnegie Endowment was set up to do, was to end the human species as we know it.
Not just going to end men, they're going to end women as well, and make us corporate creations that are patented and controlled, and the globalists are God.
But I was guessing that there's some sort of a villain that tricks people into supporting them, and then Wonder Woman gets their support, and that is how she's able to be successful.
You've been brought up that America's bad, America's terrible, it's the worst place on earth, we're the most oppressive people anywhere, and statistically, it's actually the opposite.
But we're never taught about the evils and corruption that goes on in other places where tyranny is in charge.
But when you look at historical tyranny through the last few thousand years, and then current tyrannies, and tyrannies the last hundred years, every form of tyranny, every form of abuse, every form of oppression, and really nasty stuff, and the worst people being in charge, He's in the UN, he's in the world government, he's in the corporate governance, he's in the communist Chinese.
I mean, I guess you could go with China, perhaps, but the UN leading that sentence is tough.
The way you make that sentence work is you just pretend that the world government is everything you don't like, and that the UN is actually also the League of Nations, and it's also every government that has ever existed throughout Europe, and, you know, whatever.
I think it's really funny that he absolutely cannot bring up a very obvious one in Russia with just being like, well, Putin has declared himself president for life and any crimes that he commits are retroactively impossible to charge him for.
He just attempted to kill the only person running against him for leadership.
That sounds a lot like stuff Alex wants Trump to do.
According to the CDC, there were 2,839,205 deaths total in 2019, a rate of about 867 per 100,000 population.
We don't have the total data for 2020 yet, and reliable figures won't be available for months, but the AP reported that scholars estimate the number will be over 3.2 million.
Typically you would expect a consistent rate of death to produce between 20,000 and 50,000 extra deaths each year as the population ages and also increases in just total numbers.
You know, like, my family is what they are, but my little sister and her husband both tested positive not too long ago, and I just, like, the possibilities for damage to them that we aren't even considering, like, fine, I get it.
You don't think that you're gonna die.
That's great.
Like, have you not seen long COVID symptoms?
Have you not seen people's psychosis manifest?
Like, how do you not understand how terrifyingly dangerous this shit is?
But one guy calls in and wants to talk about how diverse Trump rallies.
unidentified
I feel like the fake news media and fellow NPC Americans, they're expecting a specific archetype of Trump supporters to be there in D.C. But I feel like they'll be greatly shocked at the intellectual diversity that will come crashing through in D.C. on January 6th.
What I think is interesting is the inability for Alex to hear diversity and not immediately jump into defense mode about the clear lack of diversity at these...
These rallies from that standpoint.
Intellectual diversity, I guess, means that some people want to shoot people and some people want to...
Some people are Mies Institute libertarian types, and some people are outright fascists.
So, you know, you've got a lot of people on different sides.
Also, not for nothing, Trump got like 8% of the black vote in the last election, so it's definitely better to report that as like, oh, record black support, instead of just saying, hey, this party that I support has never gotten over 10%.
We need to keep exposing the fraud, keep showing the evidence.
And then no matter what happens, Trump is still our president.
And I think he should have that talking point because it's true that the power structure and the system has occupied America and put in their puppet and that Trump should then travel around the country rallying legislatures, state houses, and others.
And he should have a nightly TV program where he'll have more ratings than Fox.
Yeah, he should have a nightly show where he pretends to be the second president and the rightful president of the United States because there's an occupier in the house.
We took all the blessings and threw them out the window because we had a game of tennis to play or golf to play or we were going to go act cool with our friends and get drunk again.
And so who cares?
Let somebody else handle it.
Okay?
Everything will be taken from you now.
Everything.
And they're going to do it in increments where you join along, you'll be taken care of, and then, oh, it gets a little harder, but you still join, and you still keep complying while you're being strangled.
Yeah, I just hear that stuff and it's just like, hey, you could keep, you know, getting along, going along to get along, but that's how you're going to end up in submission.
You're going to end up in shackles unless you blow something up.
I'm talking about the way a Pharisee brain works is very one-dimensional-like.
You say the mask are a fraud and cause bacterial pneumonia.
You say they don't protect you.
You say they're a symbol of slavery.
Then what are you doing selling masks?
Well, when we launched them, I made the decision to print it with Infowars.com so if you're on a plane or in a restaurant where it's a private place and they're making you do it and you need to go there for whatever reason.
You wear it to fight back and then use the abuse like a judo move.
They attack you.
You use their momentum to throw them through the wall.
We understand that he's selling these masks in an attempt to encourage his audience to be oppositional, defiant to people in public, and hopefully cause a scene big enough to go viral and get some free press for InfoWars.
The thing that I think is fascinating, though, is that Alex can't grasp the critique that's coming from the other side, namely our critique.
I would say that it's strange.
That, you know, you think that this is a sign of slavery, but that somehow this sign of slavery is okay if it's a branded sign of slavery that Alex can profit off of somehow.
Whether by selling it or the free press that comes from it, or the potential new audience that gets exposed to your product by other people wearing it.
It's weird.
It's strange that a sign of slavery would somehow become acceptable if you benefit from it.
If Alex spent even a minute looking into the history of how enslaved people were branded and mutilated to signify that they were enslaved, he'd probably feel pretty bad and maybe a little bit petty complaining about having to wear a mask to go to Kroger.
It seems like he's probably rich enough that he has a pretty comfortable TV in his living room, I would assume, based on how many goddamn movies he talks about watching.
You'd think he's got a pretty cushy setup, maybe even an in-home theater setup.
His children may not be strong enough to resist the wiles of the subliminal messages that are in Wonder Woman 84. Wonder Woman did get an R rating for its subliminal messaging.
And you could make a similar argument that renting the movie at home would still be giving money to the studios and, you know, he doesn't support them.
These two dicks, so it's Tom Papert and Patrick Howley, and they both work at National File, and they are just like, I can't look at them and not think that they're babies dressed up like adults.
Then if they have a senator agree, the two chambers break off and go meet and discuss the allegations of fraud, what they should do, whether they should strike.
These electoral votes, what the proper thing to do.
And in all likelihood, Nancy Pelosi's house will say, no, Arizona's Sharpie ballot markers were fine.
That was just how elections were meant to be, according to the founding fathers.
Meanwhile, if the Republicans have a spine, which we'll see if that happens, that's the big question, they'll come back and say, no, Arizona must be thrown out.
It's then entirely up to Vice President Mike Pence.
As the presiding officer of the Joint Session of Congress, he gets to decide what to do with that information.
So Mike Pence can say, alright, I'm siding with the Senate on this one.
We're going to toss out Arizona.
He can do that.
Or Pence can do the safe thing, the expected thing, and he can say, there's no agreement.
If they find some Byzantine way where they're like, no, no, technically, I mean, I'm sorry, but according to legal code 206.C54, Trump is going to be president for the next four years.
So, if this happened the way that Papert is discussing here, these objections would have to be brought up in the January 6th Joint Session of Congress, and then it would require a senator and representative to have signed on.
Then, each house would meet separately and debate the matter.
So each objection, each state would have to have an objection with a senator and a representative signed on.
So each House of Congress would then vote, and they would require a simple majority for the objection to stand.
The objections would literally never pass the House, so you could just forget about that.
And it seems nearly impossible for me to imagine that it would end up in a 50-50 tie in the Senate, which would be the only time when Mike Pence's vote would matter.
I find it really difficult to believe, even as craven and ghoulish as some of these GOP congresspeople are, I can't imagine Mitt Romney voting along that line.
Even if you do this and you somehow get the objection to stand in the Senate, it still doesn't stand in the House.
It doesn't matter.
These statutes are really clear that in order for things like this to fly, there needs to be agreement in both houses of Congress.
When there's an alternative slate of electors offered from each state and the houses, they disagree on which to accept, quote, the statute states that the votes of the electors whose appointment was certified by the governor of the state shall be counted.
The only outcome this is going to result in is like, they're just going to draw this shit out.
Like, the process is just going to get dragged out.
They're going to stall any government operation, and they're going to further radicalize and agitate the right-wing elements who just can't accept that Trump lost.
Tom Papert's out here creating this fantasy world for them to all live in, and then when that world does not materialize, it's just gonna drive the audience deeper into the hole of resentment and insisting that the system is broken and can't be fixed.
Like, if these magical fantasy plans don't work, what hope does the actual process have?
Once you've exhausted all of your magical plans, then everybody who's believed that the magical plans could happen eventually has to go, nothing we do works.
Well, Alex, first of all, I want to make clear, because I just got a text, you know, nobody's considering replacing Mike Pence in the short term as a strategy, but mark my words, that was looked into, that was researched.
unidentified
Absolutely no one has a free pass if they're going to go against President Donald Trump.
There is no loyalty except loyalty to Donald Trump.
There is no love except love for Donald Trump.
There is no laughter except the laugh of triumph over Antifa.
There is no art, no literature, no science.
When we are omnipotent, we shall have no more need for science.
There will be no distinction between beauty and ugliness.
There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life.
All competing pleasures will be destroyed, but always, and do not forget this, Winston, there will always be the intoxication of power, constantly in Christmaston, You get where I'm going with this.
Here's what's going to happen on January 6th is great independent media like Tom and Alex Jones are going to show the world in real time all of the evidence that the courts have not been making public to the people and the Supreme Court won't even hear.
unidentified
And I know Matt Gaetz is going to fight and I know we can drag it out for hours upon hours upon hours and create a maximum pressure scenario.
And that's why what we're doing is going to really make an impact.
So, that was showing a few too many cards, I think.
Patrick Hawley knows that the only thing they're going to achieve is this big dum-dum publicity stunt, and they're going to extend the process by however long they can to maximize profits.
Unfortunately, according to the U.S. Code, each objection that gets made is limited to two hours of debate, with no congressperson being allowed more than five minutes to speak or question the matter.
You can do the math if you want, but according to the law, there's only so much they can drag this way.
It's a collection of psychopaths who have figured out that they can leverage blackmail, extortion, bribery, everything you can get to keep a seat in power no matter what country is the global hegemon.
If it's the United States, that's great.
If it's China, who cares?
I think that that is the globalist.
They are power drunk, they are sick, and they have no loyalties to anything but power.
unidentified
Well, they might have loyalty to Baal, to Moloch.
That's true.
And, you know, these are baby-killing Satanists.
They are overseeing a genocide of little babies.
They're sick people.
They have a religion.
They believe that they're, you know, descended from the Nephilim bloodlines.
I'd love to see in the future your show maybe focus on, or a new show maybe focus on how we start setting up new systems and societies to get outside of the mainstream society.
We should all just be focusing on communities, neighborhoods, towns, organizations, free association groups.
Where we want a pro-human future, where we want traditional values, where we honor life, where we honor children, where we honor goodness, because they've overtaken the churches and control most of those.
And so we need something that, I don't want to even use the word secular, but something that's just human and saying we reject death.
As you know, there was this supposed leak from the Supreme Court, which I'm a little bit doubtful of.
Stating that John Roberts, you know, had a yelling and screaming session threatening conservatives into not taking up the Texas case for fear of rioting in the United States if we ever, you know, allow Trump to be re-elected.
Well, the Supreme Court came out the next day and said there was no such yelling match because the Supreme Court justice haven't met in person for weeks because of COVID-19.
Everything is done by Zoom meeting.
It's very possible they did meet in person because John Roberts wouldn't have wanted to put this on Zoom, which is not a secure form of communications.
It could have been tapped and leaked to the American people what he was saying on that.
So I think there's good arguments in both cases.
But this much I do know, Alex, that John Roberts is a controlled individual by the deep state.
I would guess that any communication between Supreme Court justices is not something that anyone would want to leak, and therefore this meeting would not be different or special from any other meeting.
It's so much a desperate attempt to trick people into thinking he's prepared at all because it visually looks like he might have.
There's so much paper out here.
I would be more impressed if he had nothing.
But it's all just a magic trick.
Anyway, Alex, apparently the story is another level of deep COVID denialism that, again, was the kind of thing that I just had to walk away from, breathe a little bit, and just be like, oh, fuck you, man.
So again, they're like, oh, we're turning people away.
Well, that's like saying one restaurant is full, but there's 10 more next door that aren't.
That's how they statistically manipulate it.
But I'm not just going to tell you that.
We're going to show you where you can go directly into the CDC's own numbers and see what every hospital in your town or city has because the COVID cases are all reported, because they're all incentivized to call it COVID to get money, and most of these people don't even need to be in the hospital.
But Travis County is at, as of last night, 9% COVID capacity.
There are 77 people in hospitals in Austin, in Travis County, That supposedly have COVID.
We're talking millions of people, 77 in the hospital.
Alex is desperately trying to spin the news stories that have been coming out about how hospitals are going to have to start talking about rationing care because they can't handle the load of patients with the surge of COVID-19 cases.
Obviously, this is something that people have been warning about for a long time and everything Alex has stood for has been the exact things that people warned would cause the need to ration care and turn people away from hospitals.
The fact that we've reached the point we have should be a sign that people like Alex Jones have been a cancerous influence on the public information space.
And that his recommendations have led exactly where everyone knew they would.
So it's super important for him to act like all this is imaginary.
Or something.
The way he chooses to do it is by covering the story like a fifth grader doing a book report about a novel he's only pretending to have read.
There's a couple of details that he got from reading the back cover that he's hitting really hard in order to fake like he knows what he's talking about.
A December 28th article in the Austin Statesman reported that the ICU occupancy in Travis County rose 62% in just the previous week.
The county has a maximum ICU availability of 200 patients, and they were at 132 on Monday night.
There are 422 hospitalizations in the county linked to COVID-19 as of the time of the writing of that article.
I was trying to get a sense of what Alex would possibly be talking about because the numbers that he's using are just completely out of sync with anything I can find reported anywhere.
I looked at the Austin COVID-19 surveillance dashboard and I think I figured out where he got the 77 number from.
I think that was the number of people listed as on ventilators at the time that he looked By December 31st, that number was up to 81, but it seems like the number could have possibly be close to what he was saying at the time that he read it.
And I actually found a Statesman article from earlier this week that cited that the number of people on ventilators was 77 in Austin on Monday when this episode was recorded.
So I'm pretty sure that sounds about right.
What's outrageous about this, if this is what he's going off of, like this misinterpretation, is that right next to the ventilator number on the COVID-19 dashboard is the hospitalized figure in twice as large a font, which is much higher.
If Alex actually had looked to find these numbers, it would be literally impossible for him to miss that one and see the other one.
It kind of heavily implies that either he's just repeating something that someone told him, which is inaccurate, or he's willfully passing along inaccurate information in order to minimize the public health risk posed by COVID-19, which stands a very good chance of getting extra people killed.
Also, in terms of deaths, the city of Austin put out a press release on December 30th announcing that COVID-19 was the third highest cause of death this year, behind only cancer and heart disease.
The number is at least 548 this year.
If you do a little bit of math, that's north of one a week.
Ladies and gentlemen, I'm about to lay out for you the absolute proof of total criminal fraud by the hospitals, by the media, by the CDC, because they go on the news and they say, we've got to lock down the economy.
You can't leave your house for a few months.
We're going to have 2.5 million dead in just a few months.
So what's going on here is that Alex is upset about an article he didn't read in NPR where they had some links that I guess he's certain no one followed.
I'm certain that Alex didn't do any original research on this, nor do I believe that he went and looked at the raw data because I'm certain he would be unable to read the Excel spreadsheet.
It's...
It's a lot of rows.
He's talking about the data visualization that NPR posted, which does show that Travis County has 9% of its known inpatient beds used for COVID patients.
The problem with that stat on its own is that it's meaningless.
For instance, if Alex looked a little bit deeper into the data, he'd see that 9 out of 15 Austin hospitals are not included in the data set.
So it's a little incomplete in terms of getting the full picture.
But even beyond that, the problem isn't that all the beds are being taken up by COVID patients.
It's that with a rise in COVID patients, the hospitals will reach their capacity and have no beds left for anybody else who might need treatment.
That's why a more than surface-level analysis of this data is important.
So let's take St. David's Medical Center in Austin as an example.
They show 7% of their adult inpatient beds being taken up for COVID patients.
That seems like nothing.
A drop in the bucket at 7%.
However, if you look at the next column, you'll see that 93% of their total adult inpatient beds are occupied.
So any increases in COVID patients would be a disaster for them.
You see this in many of the included Austin hospitals.
Ascension Seton Medical Center has 13% of its beds taken by COVID patients but 90% total occupied.
Dell Seton Medical Center at UT Austin has 23% of its beds taken by COVID patients but 94% are occupied total.
For North Austin Medical Center, 10% are COVID patients, but 94% total are occupied.
This is the pattern that is the important piece.
Yeah, the concern is definitely partially that there are a lot of COVID patients that need to be treated.
But the larger picture has to take into account that hospitals have a certain capacity.
And even beyond that, they only have a certain amount of human attention that can be provided to patients.
You can't magically create doctors and nurses in a 3D printer.
So even if you add a ton of beds or put patients who should be in the ICU and non-ICU, This is the sort of context that Alex deprives his audience of because he thinks that he has a slam dunk with the optics of this 9% statistic.
He can yell that 9% all he wants, but it doesn't change the reality that it's far more complex than surface-level faked book reports.
I feel like I might be saying this a lot, but this shit's disgraceful.
Again, those are the hospitals that we just discussed.
He's not taking into account the larger picture, and he's gloating about missing the point, which is kind of like exactly what Alex does.
I mean, it's perfect.
I'm going to cut out this next clip because it's pointless, but I just thought it was pretty funny that Alex claims that he fact-checked Johns Hopkins.
The actual UN document where they admit it's all a hoax and for power and control, bigger than the Great Reset.
It was first in a Canadian document.
They tried to say, well, we're not sure what's real, but we were able to search the document and find other documents from other countries that confirm it is real.
You know, judging by the number of times it came up in cartoons when I was growing up, I assumed you would be able to solve most anti-reality problems with a frying pan to the side of the head.
You know?
Like, if this happens, if somebody says something like that...
Because we've heard Ivan Reiklund before, and basically his interview is no more interesting than Trump should use the emergency alert system to fuck with people.
I'm not entirely sure, but I was listening to this and I'm like, I'm gonna get mad.
I don't like this.
But then I realized, I'm not gonna get mad.
I'm gonna feel really sad for these people.
I mean...
Look, no I don't.
But at the same time, I feel gross.
Maybe that's what I feel.
I'm not sure.
I need to talk to my therapist to figure out exactly what I feel about this.
unidentified
We need more help, Alex.
We need everyone to go to FreeKaiUSA.com.
Kai was subjected to an outrageous, excessive, unconstitutional $2 million cash bail amount.
We raised those $10 million.
We put the cash on the barrel head.
We got him free.
We set him free.
He's with his family.
But we need a lot more resources.
This is going to be a long, hard, Every American, every Democrat, Republican, Independent should care about this because they're coming after Kyle Rittenhouse now, and they're going to come after you next.
Like, if he didn't defame people, then he wouldn't be getting sued for those things.
If Kyle Rittenhouse hadn't shot people, or even, you know, been at this protest with a gun that he shouldn't legally have had, like, there's a number of issues that, you know, like, it's not like globalists want to just turn people into symbols or whatever.
There's actions that precede those.
Lawsuits or arrests that generally are what caused them.
Because if the left has turned her son into a criminal and a murderer, then they should be putting him on a pedestal based on her saying that they take criminals and put them on pedestals.
Whenever the one kid goes to jail and his mom winds up sleeping with the corrupt, evil Northern Irish police chief to get him out, and he's like, Mom, what did you do?
What did you do?
That's infinitely better than if you find out your mom sold your face on a bikini.
And then the lawyer comes in and says this, and I got even worse vibes off this dude.
unidentified
There has been a long march through the institutions over the past few decades.
It's very similar to the...
The Maoist Revolution in China and the Chinese Communist Party, their tactics are very clear.
They attempt to destroy everything sacred in a society.
They tear down statues.
They try to destroy history.
They try to destroy our faith in God.
And they try to capture the key cultural elite institutions, such as the media, such as academia, such as the financial institutions, and today, such as big tech.
And they've been pretty successful on that front.
But I'll tell you, Americans are waking up now, and we're going to fight back, and it's not going to be pretty for those who are attempting to take our freedom.
This is like when you're 17 and they're like, when you go to college, you need to get a good humanities education and then you can kind of start getting into your specialty.
And you're all like, nah, I don't need, what is all this humanities bullshit?
My major is pre-law or whatever.
And it's like, this is why you need a humanities education.
This is why you need to read anything other than law.
Also, any political system where you think it's a good idea to be able to write get-out-of-jail-free cards, like one-free-murder cards preemptively, that's a bad system.
Where you saw a few months ago they got the Canadian document about the next lockdown's coming and then there'll be the strain too and then we'll never unlock things until the communist takeover happens.