Today, after too long a time since Part 1, Dan and Jordan get back on track with trying to follow the path of Bill Cooper's coverage of the bombing of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City. In this installment, the gents gain some extra insight into Bill from his biography, learn about one of Bill's listener's relationship with their dad, and reveal what Dan learned that made him dance around his apartment.
Yes, if you're out there listening and thinking, hey, I enjoy the show, I'd like to support what these gents do, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show, we would appreciate it.
But I figured that that would not be really enough for us to really bank on being an episode by the time we need to get to recording.
So, we'll save that for Wednesday, and today, I'd like to start off this episode with an explanation.
About a month ago, we started covering Bill Cooper's coverage of the Oklahoma City bombing, which I had sincerely intended to become a running weekly investigation.
I was so confident that we were going to keep moving forward that I teased that I'd found something that made me dance around my apartment, which to this point has not been revealed.
And I'm sorry that people have had to live in that confusion.
I promise that that mystery will be solved today.
The issue was that the very next week from when we started that, we learned that Project Camelot was going to a subscription model.
And as such, I felt an obligation to check in on that.
Camelot's been a large part of this podcast's history, and it's been an important pressure release, as well as an interesting case study in how so many of these different fields of weird conspiracy share a ton of DNA.
So Camelot filled the next week's open slot for a non-Alex episode.
And then that was the week that the police murdered George Floyd, sparking protests and an important movement that runs directly counter to what Alex Jones wants to see in the world.
It felt critical that we keep a sharp eye on the present day of his show, and I know that you and I had conversations about how it would feel bizarre to do an episode and it not be about Alex's take on the evolving situation, the protests, all of that seemed like it was important to chronicle it, even if Alex's response to it was not necessarily as interesting as you might have expected.
And also, through those couple weeks, I was trying to move, which took up a ton of my time.
Our episode from Friday about Owen's dumb push-up contest was the product of multiple influences.
The first was that Alex had been out of studio all week.
The second was that I really needed something kind of light to discuss since we were recording just a few days after I moved, and I was still working on settling into this new place, and Owen's dumb push-up contest fit that bill amazingly.
I would probably have rather done a Bill Cooper Oklahoma City episode.
Like I even said on the episode, this isn't the kind of meaty thing I want to be doing.
But I just couldn't swing it, for a couple of reasons.
The first was a time issue.
Cooper episodes are dense, and they require a lot more prep time.
The second issue is probably more important, and that was that I needed to finish reading Bill Cooper's biography, Pale Horse Rider.
Our show focuses on Alex Jones, who doesn't have a biography written about him yet, so the idea of reading one about another person we were covering seemed strange to me.
It almost felt like cheating.
I really enjoy the process of discovery that comes from having no idea what's going to come up, and we're diving in and learning as we go.
That works alright with Alex or these space weirdos, but I realize that with Bill Cooper, not consulting that text is essentially missing a big part of the story.
There are important pieces of context in that biography that I wouldn't ever have gotten from just listening to the hour of the time, and those pieces of context are pretty important.
So I felt it would be irresponsible for me to move forward and do another episode about Bill Cooper without taking in that biography and really sitting with it.
This leads me to what I would want to give as a Sort of sizable clarification.
We were wrong to give Bill the benefit of the doubt as it relates to him being a gigantic piece of shit.
The problem is, we're dealing almost exclusively with tremendous monsters.
So we're so far below the Mendoza line of just general being a fair human being, that simply because we speak about you on our show, chances are you should assume that they're the worst human being in the world.
I would like to now, knowing this stuff, make it an apology for not being aware of this earlier.
Overall, I think that book, Pale Horse Rider, does a really good job of demonstrating how much of a liar Bill Cooper was without outright making accusations.
Beyond these things, there was one piece of information in that book that's very relevant to our current exploration about Oklahoma City.
Which I highly doubt I would have learned about from listening to Bill's show.
We'll get to that down the road and also the thing that made me dance around my apartment as we go through this.
Bill's on shortwave and he does a better job of censoring himself than Alex does.
It's pretty remarkable.
So there's such an interesting phenomenon that seems almost entirely consistent, which is that when there's terrifying, seemingly random tragedies in this country, people flock to whoever is most loudly calling it fake.
Alex got a huge surge out of 9-11 denial, and we've seen him explicitly discuss how his traffic increased in the days after the Boston bombing when he was yelling about it being a false flag.
We've also seen him discuss lately how his COVID-19 denialism led to an increase in viewership.
This makes some sense, but it also says something really sad about people.
It's scary to process things like a bombing or a virus outbreak, and we crave easy answers.
A pandemic is terrifying, and there's no easy fix to it, so it becomes very appealing to listen to the person saying that the virus itself is no big deal and that all the actual problems could be solved by killing the globalists.
A random bombing carried out by domestic extremists is super terrifying, because no matter how much the police might try, they'll never be able to uncover and stop every possible plot people may come up with.
It's just a reassuring thought to believe that, you know, there's an evil cabal of globalists who are orchestrating all of these bombings, and if they're just taken care of, the bombings will magically go away.
Yeah, if you had to grapple with the reality that ultimately no one knows what's going on, the world is complete chaos, and really you can bully a lot of people who think they're powerful into doing whatever it is you want them to do.
In times of crisis, these kinds of narratives are an attractive crutch to reach out for, and I'm depressed but not surprised to see that people were behaving the same way back in the times of Bill Cooper.
It's unfortunate for the listeners because all they get is junk food narratives that mean nothing and go nowhere, but it's also bad for people like Bill and Alex.
They learn the wrong lessons from this kind of reinforcement.
They learn, whether consciously or not, that denying tragedy is something that draws, which definitely has been a lesson that screwed Alex over more than once.
I think it's really interesting just because deep down, regardless, you can hate authority or you can love authority, whomever may be in power at any given point in time, but what unites most people is just that I want to believe somebody is in charge.
I want to believe there's an adult in the room.
There needs to be an adult in the room, and there simply aren't.
You need to speak authoritatively about things you have no business being authoritative about, and that will give people the false confidence that they need to put aside those feelings of fear and uncertainty.
Somehow they think that's worth losing all their liberties for.
And, of course, the promise that if they're really good and do what they're supposed to do and echo the Marxist-Socialist party line, that they might get to have a retirement check someday.
Goring immediately informed Hitler and Goebbels, this is a communist outrage.
One of the communist culprits has been arrested.
Wow.
Talk about speed.
Remind you of anything?
They're talking about people vaporized in Oklahoma City, yet they found immediately enough parts of a truck to identify those who rented it and make absolutely accurate photographic sketches and get them on the wire service.
So, like I said, he's in the middle of reading basically an essay one of his listeners wrote about the Reichstag fire, and he's editorializing here to compare that, how that unfolded to the current situation with the Oklahoma City bombing.
You provide him content, you get a pat on the head.
So, Bill seems to bring up two specific complaints.
One is that a suspect was identified too quickly for his taste, and two, it's absurd that they found an axle which led to the rider truck that Timothy McVeigh used for the bombing.
The story about the axle is actually pretty interesting, and you can find corroborating information about that find pretty much wherever you look.
There's an indie online piece from earlier this year where they interview Dennis Muntian, a firefighter who was a responder to the bombing, looking back on it 25 years later.
Muntean was 19 years old when he assisted in the response to the Murrah building, and if you read his account, you'll find this.
Quote, Muntean recalled, on his walk to the bombing site, he pointed to a truck axle in the middle of the road.
Twelve hours later, as he walked back to the bus, investigators were circling the axle and studying it.
He later learned that it was from the rider truck loaded with explosives.
This firefighter had seen the axle, which he didn't think was necessarily meaningful at all.
Could have been from another car in the area or whatever.
So that was when he was entering the scene, and it wasn't until later that that item was seen as significant.
It's not weird at all, really, that a destructive bomb could discharge something like a truck axle and have a completely different effect on other matter surrounding it.
In the real world, this axle was found and traced to a rider truck, which then led to a specific location that the truck was rented from.
The employee of the truck shop gave the FBI information and a description to make a composite sketch, which they then took around to all the businesses in Oklahoma City, ultimately finding a hotel where the staff recognized him and put a name to the face.
It went pretty quick because this was a crime that required around-the-clock work by all available agents.
Timothy McVeigh had already been arrested at this point.
He'd been pulled over by a state trooper 90 minutes after the bombing, approximately 80 miles north of Oklahoma City, which is about where you'd expect a guy to be if he was fleeing.
McVeigh was missing a license plate and was found to have a concealed weapon, so he was arrested.
And while he was being held, the word went out that the FBI had put a name to the sketch, and it was this guy.
It's pretty remarkable how quickly a suspect was determined, and it's a weird quirk that he'd already been arrested for a seemingly unrelated charge, but none of that proves anything nefarious.
The timing and causality of these events makes total sense, so I'm going to need to see stronger arguments here from Bill to be convinced that this is a New World Order plot.
You can yell about, like, oh, they found a guy so quick, it's like the Reichstag, how they fingered the commies, and it's just like...
Hitler controls some 250 seats, not a clear majority.
If he could wipe out the critical 100 communist seats, he would win his battle for power.
Nazi authorities had already raided the Karl Liebknecht House, headquarters of the Communist Party in Bland, but they had failed to incriminate the Communists in a revolutionary conspiracy as a pretext for silencing them.
They had to think of something else, because the date for a national election was fast approaching.
And so Hitler burned the Reichstag.
Blamed it on his political enemies and seized control of Germany and you know the rest.
Yeah, it's the result of desperately straining to make connections between historical events and present circumstances.
It's one thing to say that Hitler blamed the Reichstag fire on communists in order to solidify his power and demonize his enemies.
But it's a completely different thing to claim that it's the same thing going on with Oklahoma City.
Bill Clinton became president in 1992 and was up for re-election in 1996.
After the 1994 midterm elections, the Republican Party had control of both the House and Senate, so presumably what Bill Cooper is trying to imply...
Is that Bill Clinton was trying to blame the OKC bombing on the right-wing extremists to take control of Congress in the 1996 election.
This did not happen, as the Republicans held on to their majorities in both the House and Senate, as well as their majority of governorships around the country.
Yeah, it's always nice to remember, when you look at our political system today, that once we were allowing Newt Gingrich to roam the earth with power, which is a terrible idea.
Narratives like the one Bill is putting forth here sound good if you're looking for a way to blame your political enemies for everything bad that happens, but at a certain point, you have to take a step back and recognize how none of the things that should happen if Bill Cooper is right ever happen.
The Clintons didn't use OKC to bring in a socialist dictatorship, and they didn't even win Congress the next year.
If he's painting the Nazis as a socialist regime with, as he would call it, a Marxist socialist doctrine, why is Hitler trying to get rid of the communists instead of allying with him?
He considers Marxism and socialism to be equal and the same, I suppose.
So why is it that Hitler hates the communists in his worldview, wherein Hitler is also a communist?
Wouldn't it be possible to just wrangle him in and be like, hey, we're getting a communist system, and they're like, well, we don't like fascism, and he's like...
Or I'll kill you and they're like, we love racism!
You know, enter these people's minds to understand the logic and the thinking, and I don't know.
I think I could answer from Alex's perspective, but from Bill's, I don't know what he would say.
He would say that the communists and the Nazis are not actually of the same ilk, but they're being controlled by the same people to be against each other.
So there's no mistake, and I'm not making this up, he clearly says, ladies and gentlemen, I don't care what the government says, these are clearly two separate and distinct events.
Both of the same magnitude and the same duration, parted by ten seconds.
Ten seconds.
He clearly shows us how to read this.
He shows us a train that passed close to the sensor.
He shows us normal traffic, heavy traffic, and then the two events.
Two separate and distinct explosions, not echoes.
The source is Dr. Lusa of the Oklahoma Geological Survey, Starkey Energy Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, and we received this information on the 21st.
And from the article in the Oklahoman, quote, Luza said the second event recorded on the seismograph could have been a secondary reaction, which he referred to as a refraction effect, from the explosion at the federal building in Oklahoma City.
He said the reading could have also come from a quarry blast.
Lusa described the waves detected in Norman as surface waves.
He said without seismographic readings from two other locations, geologists cannot determine where the waves came from.
This piece of information that Bill has latched onto as proof of multiple explosions is not true.
The foundation of his conspiracy is something that he's misunderstanding, and he's reinforcing his misunderstanding by misrepresenting the comments of an expert.
Yeah, if an expert says two things, refraction and I'm going to need the confirmation from two other sources, that means the government is fucking lying to you, Dan.
I'm going to tell this person who listens to Bill Cooper's radio show and emails him constantly that I can tell you definitively the government is lying.
How can someone who pretends to be a just-the-facts kind of investigator get on his show and report that an unspecific number of senior supervisors for an unspecified agency weren't at work on the day of the bombing without substantiating that at all, then use the insinuation to assert that someone must have warned them not to come to work?
Even if we go ahead and assume that an uncommon number of supervisors were not in the building when the bomb went off, how can Bill prove that someone had to have warned them?
Is it not possible that some of them might have been in the field or on assignment?
Is it not possible that some might have called into work sick that day?
There's a ton of possibilities that Bill's just completely ignoring because the conclusion has already been reached in his mind, and the process of reporting on this story only exists to serve the goal of solidifying that conclusion.
Bill Cooper basically cosplays as a guy who's looking for the truth.
Sometimes it manifests in good ways, like when he scolds his listeners for bringing up unfounded nonsense, but in reality, those are not instances of him caring about the truth.
When Bill scolds his callers for bringing up rumors, that's really just him expressing his authority over the audience.
It's good research when he passes along rumors, but it's abhorrent and stupid when the listeners do the same thing.
It's basically cult leader stuff, where it's a sin for you to do something that's a virtue for me.
And this brilliant explosives expert, who planned and carried out one of the most terrible crimes in the history of the country, speeds away in a car with no license plate, and he is expediting the speed limit to the point where he has to get caught.
And the officer stops him, notices he doesn't have a license plate, and begins writing a ticket, glances inside the car, and sees a concealed weapon?
And the fact that Bill's going down that road is kind of embarrassing.
It's an indication of how weak his position is, and he's just trying to cast doubt and make the arrest suspicious.
There's something interesting going on here with Bill's claim that, you know, it's weird that he didn't try and kill the police officer, that Timothy McVeigh didn't try to kill him.
Six years after the bombing, a right-wing media figure would tell a story about how they had met with Timothy McVeigh and an associate before the bombing.
The meeting ended with them telling him to, quote, watch Oklahoma City.
But one of the topics of conversation was what should McVeigh do if he's pulled over by the police?
Quote, just take the ticket and go on your way, was the advice McVeigh was given, to which he replied, quote, you don't think I should shoot them?
This was rebuffed, quote, why would you shoot someone over a ticket?
When Bill Cooper saw the sketch of Timothy McVeigh and saw that he was the main suspect for the Oklahoma City bombing, he had to have realized that he'd met that guy and he was pretty fucked up.
Bill had to realize that he'd seen McVeigh in possession of a bunch of copies of the Turner Diaries and that he'd been told to, quote, watch Oklahoma City.
So McVeigh and his associate had been traveling on I-40 when they decided to stop in at Surplus and Stuff, the owner of which was a friend of Bill Cooper's named Tim Lesperance.
According to Pale Horse Rider, quote, Lesperance asked them if they'd ever heard of Bill Cooper.
That sounds Alex-y.
That's how the meeting came to happen.
Eventually, investigators learned that another man named Michael Fortier had been aware of the plot to blow up the Murrah Building, but had dropped out of the conspiracy before it came to fruition.
Pale Horse Rider includes a passage from an interview that Michael Fortier did in August 1995 with an outlet called The Outpost of Freedom.
Quote, what led to the bombing?
Hunt asked Fortier, who had backed out of the Murrah Building plot halfway through and later served as the state's star witness against his former compatriots.
Well, Fortier sighed, I can't say a whole lot, but we heard a lot of tapes and saw videos and read things.
There's this guy with a radio station in Arizona, Phil Cooper.
He kept calling people sheeple and was mad that they ain't doing anything to change things.
Well, we got to thinking, that's right, things need to change.
Tim really responded to that.
Bill's work of trying to build up a conspiracy theory that gets Timothy McVeigh off the hook is sloppy and desperate, and possibly on some level that could be motivated by a recognition that he knows fully well he's part of what inspired the bombing.
This is basically the same behavior that we see from Alex Jones all the time, and it's an important thing to understand.
While this is certainly not a universal thing, a lot of conspiracy theory operates as a way to cover up the unpleasant and damning parts of one's own community that you don't want to recognize and accept are real.
Alex constantly comes up with conspiracy theories to minimize and ignore white supremacist violence because he knows that his show operates on a white identity level that has a possibility of inspiring such acts.
Similarly, he knows that his extremist, gun absolutist rhetoric requires him to come up with conspiracy theories every time there's a mass shooting.
The reality of mass shootings and white supremacist violence are threatening to Alex's worldview, so it's important that those things be denied and explained away with conspiracy theories.
It's the globalists doing it.
They juiced somebody up.
It's mind control.
In the same way, Bill Cooper's entire thing is very threatened by the idea that someone who was directly inspired by his show and ideology could have bombed a federal building and killed tons of people.
It's the ugly conclusion of the rhetoric that he's put out, and Bill knows that, so this requires a conspiracy.
Bill wouldn't tell his story of meeting McVeigh until a few years later, but even here, mere days after the bombing, you can see the ripple of Bill's influence.
Timothy McVeigh could have shot the cop who pulled him over, and he might have gotten away.
But he didn't, because he was just pulled over for missing a plate, and as Bill Cooper had allegedly told him, why kill someone over a ticket?
And here on air, Bill is baffled by the decision that he very well might have advised Timothy McVeigh to make, and is using that decision as proof that McVeigh couldn't be the bomber, because if he was, he would have tried to kill the cop.
Larry Nichols on the Jazz McKay Show, WWWE, at 11 a.m. in Cleveland, identified one of the suspects from the artist's drawings as either Brown or Boyd of Mena, Arkansas.
And speaking of Mena, Arkansas, Hillary Clinton will be indicted.
My information is that she has already been indicted in secret, and it will be announced to the public sometime within the next week.
So I know we've been sort of wondering where the worlds of Bill Cooper and Alex Jones would intersect as it relates to Larry Nichols, and here we have it.
Part of me had hoped that Bill would be smart enough to not trust Larry, but as it turns out, if someone hates Bill Clinton, you just go ahead and believe whatever they say.
Also, like what you were pointing out, that thing about Hillary is fascinating, mostly because this is a meme that's recently been resurrected on social media and spread around by dum-dums.
The Clintons at the time were in the middle of the Whitewater scandal, but Hillary wasn't set to be indicted, nor was she secretly indicted.
According to a 1995 article in the Washington Post, this theory was spread by a guy named Sherman Skolnick, a contributor at the Conspiracy Nation newsletter.
Skolnick was, quote, convinced that either Clinton's financial supporters or someone in the government ordered the bombing to obscure the fact that two days earlier, Hillary Rodham Clinton was indicted on two felony counts in the Whitewater probe.
Secret indictments are kind of a standard trope of conspiracy, as you can see from the present and from the mid-90s.
They're an appealing angle because there is such a thing as a sealed indictment, so you can craft all kinds of theories about them that feel like truth to people.
It's fair enough to point out that people in this country are innocent until they're proven guilty.
The issue comes down to the fact that it's pretty obvious that Bill will consider these guys innocent long after and despite the fact that they've been proven guilty of the bombing.
He's just using the idea of innocence until being proven guilty as a way to insist that they are, in fact, innocent.
It may be the case that Timothy McVeigh was not a formal member of a specific militia, but that doesn't mean he's not a creature of the same world of militias.
There's been reporting that shows that Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols attended meetings of the Michigan militia.
Their then-leader, Norman Olson, told the Associated Press, These people were told to leave because of that kind of talk of destruction and harm and terrorism.
This naturally is the kind of thing that makes sense to say after someone bombed a federal building.
However, you may sound a little different beforehand.
Michigan Live pointed out that a year before the bombing, Norman Olson told a recruitment meeting, quote, if this country doesn't change, armed conflict is inevitable.
You bring in disaffected, angry young men with talk of armed conflict, then deny that you had anything to do with them when they follow through with those words.
This is a pattern that you see in right-wing propagandists pretty much across the board.
Infowars interviews Jack Posobiec about how scary Comet Ping Pong Pizza is, then they pretend they never got into Pizzagate stuff after someone shows up at Comet Ping Pong with a gun.
This is how it works.
On a more meaningful level, the fact that McVeigh may not have been officially in a militia is meaningless.
His beliefs lined up almost entirely with the beliefs of right-wing militias at the time.
He was largely motivated by the government's actions in Waco, which was a galvanizing point for pretty much all right-wing militias.
It's weird that Bill is bringing up this idea that McVeigh had a chip implanted in him, because this sort of thing apparently wouldn't require any research for him to know about.
From Pale Horse Rider, Then the withdrawn McVeigh spoke up plaintively.
He also had a computer chip implanted in his body, he said.
Cooper could touch it if he wanted to.
It was in his right butt cheek.
He really wanted me to confirm it was there.
"I declined for obvious reasons," Cooper said, suddenly turning sympathetic to the executed bomber.
"But I wish to this day that I had not been so squeamish and had personally checked his buttock to see if there was something there." According to Bill Cooper's own telling of the events, Timothy McVeigh himself Yeah.
So there are two possibilities here.
One is that Bill is reporting things that he got directly from McVeigh, and he's lying by omission by not telling the audience where that information came from because he knew that it would probably raise more questions than he'd like if it were known that he'd met with the Oklahoma City bomber who was in the process of, you know, he's in the middle of creating a conspiracy to defend the guy.
And listen, my buddy Timothy McVeigh over here, he was telling me that he had a computer chip in his ass and I wouldn't touch his ass because obvious reasons.
Michael Fortier's interview, where he discussed how Timothy McVeigh really responded to Bill Cooper's talk about how people needed to actually do something, that's information that's not filtered through Bill, and thus it can be taken a little bit more seriously.
Bill may or may not have actually met Timothy McVeigh, but he definitely inspired him.
That's the conclusion that you really can't shake.
So we get in here, or we're about to jump to the 26th, but like I said, this episode on the 25th is just Bill rambling about how great militias are.
And it honestly has no connection to the present day or the bombing, really, outside of it being intensely defensive about people suddenly being a bit curious about what's going on in these militias.
I found myself zoning out almost entirely as Bill went on and on about how if you're an able-bodied person in Arizona between the ages of 18 and 45, you're a member of the militia whether you want to be or not.
It was all just stuff that I couldn't get myself to care about because even if that's technically true according to the Arizona Constitution, who cares?
It had been my intent, my dream, my purpose in doing all that I have done and subjecting my family to all the suffering that they've been subjected to and spending all the money that we've spent upon this instead of upon ourselves to try to prevent any of this from ever happening by waking enough people So
that by sheer weight of numbers of educated, awake, intelligent, smart people could prevent all of this.
I have this overwhelming sense that somehow I failed.
It's interesting, because we just recently saw Alex getting into this mode as the coronavirus, as the COVID-19 stuff, started to become more outside of his narratives, I guess.
More real than his narratives.
A lot of talk of...
We've lost this.
The globalists have won.
That kind of thing.
You're seeing the exact kind of similar response to Bill after realizing, yeah, Timothy McVeigh is going to be proven to be guilty of this.
It's so interesting to see after a crisis point, after a really big thing that is maybe beyond your abilities to spin or to make all right, you realize, I've failed.
It's strange because it's kind of their way of taking responsibility for it by absolutely not taking any responsibility for what happened and instead taking responsibility for something that is 100% fictional.
So, one of the things that I've come to realize as I listen to more and more of Bill's show is that his information gathering process is almost entirely just messages that he gets from listeners.
From our station chief on the scene in Oklahoma City.
Did I dream that I heard this?
Did someone else say it?
Please find someone else who listens to National Public Radio's All Things Considered evening show today, and make sure that I am mistaken about this.
I hope I am wrong.
I thought I heard a professor from George Washington University, when being interviewed about the explosion of hate, say that we would have to choose between keeping and expressing our freedom of speech.
This is such a great manifestation of how bad this operation is.
Like, Bill fancies himself to be the head of an intelligence operation of the Second Continental Army of the Republic, and as such, he has the Citizens Agency of Joint Intelligence, or CAGI, which serves as his data-gathering team.
That's just his listeners who have paid him dues, sending him emails that he calls intelligence reports.
And here you can see the quality of the work that's being done by his station chief who has emailed Bill to complain about something she thinks she heard on NPR.
So Bill's Oklahoma station chief and his source for a lot of his bombing reporting is a woman named Michelle Moore.
She had no training in journalism or intelligence gathering, being a ballet instructor by trade.
Moore liked Bill Cooper, so she paid her dues and signed an oath of allegiance to the Second Continental Army of the Republic and was named a, quote, second lieutenant of the intelligence service under Bill.
Moore would go on to write a 640-page book called Oklahoma City Day One that Bill thought was going to be his masterpiece.
It was going to definitively prove all these conspiracies based on thorough documentation of media lies on the day of the blast.
Bill insisted on expensive binding for the first edition, which he charged $60 for.
He sent for an initial printing of 500 copies, and he couldn't even sell that.
In Pale Horse Rider, one of Bill's friends says he, quote, still has several untouched boxes of the limited and signed first edition piled up in Cooper's old storage unit.
Anyway, Michelle Moore is Bill's station chief in Oklahoma, who is where he's getting a lot of this information from, and, quote, in recognition of her tireless work.
Hey, maybe you could have figured out what the seismograph readings meant if you weren't spending your time dicking around talking about your station chief's dad.
Yeah, you're seeing a family break, I mean, who knows how accurately she's portraying things, I have no idea, but taken at face value, you're seeing someone feel alienated from their own parent, where they're saying treasonous things because they believe the communist news network.
Now, what they're doing is that they're taking information that they got from the crematorium person and applying it to news reports of people being vaporized.
And then they're saying, like, well, if one happened, then the other can't.
And I don't think that that's fair.
Because the issue comes down to force.
Depending on where the bomb was in the truck, it's possible that the axle could have been sent flying with the complete outward force from the explosion.
Simultaneously, someone standing near the truck might have had the force of the blast hit them and drive them, let's say, straight into a wall, which could lead to their body being essentially vaporized.
What Bill is doing here is creating a false contradiction.
He's implying that one thing is true and therefore another thing cannot be true, when in reality both can be.
to physics, it totally could.
What Bill is doing here is also mixing up what vaporized means in different contexts.
He goes on to give a long diatribe about the temperatures at which things like calcium vaporize, which he's trying to use to prove that any part of the rider truck would have been vaporized as well if a human body was vaporized.
This isn't what people mean when they say that a body was vaporized, generally speaking.
There's a definition that scientists would use to describe the chemical processes, and then there's the sort of vernacular.
The third definition in Merriam-Webster is, quote, to destroy by or as if by converting to vapor.
This sentence is, you know, that they use to demonstrate it in a sentence is, quote, a tank vaporized by a shell.
Because when you say vaporized, if you mean it in a destructive way, the way that these guys are talking about it, they're talking about there should be nothing left.
From the stories that I was able to find, both about the Oklahoma City bombing and also the World Trade Center, typically the ways in which vaporized was being used generally had to do with people who died in ways that you couldn't get identifiable remains.
If someone's body is exploded to a point where it's not recognizable, it seems like there are instances where that's just called body was vaporized.
It's not a technical term, and I think that what Bill is doing is seeing that word being used in some media coverage and then implying...
Or pretending that what they're actually saying is that everything was so hot that the body became vapor.
And I'm not convinced that that is the truth.
I'm not convinced that that's what those news stories were saying.
Ladies and gentlemen, the time is brought to you by Swiss America Trading.
If you're interested in getting your hands on some real money before the proverbial buffalo chip hits the fan, and I'm telling you it's not far off, then you better call our sponsor, Swiss America Trading, and talk to them about what real money really is.
And that's why they blew up in the building in Oklahoma City, because I'm telling you right now, it was the government intelligence community that did it.
It would have to be a response to this first shot, and therefore completely justified.
That's the implication of what Bill's saying, but he would never say that, because then the game's over.
This is one of the things that I see as just proof that these people are full of shit.
If you think you've proven that the New World Order blew up a federal building and killed tons of people, and that isn't enough for you to say that it's time to take up arms against them, where is that point?
There is no point, because you know that when you cross that line, you're not making any more money, and you're probably going to jail.
He said that Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols were not patriots, but he since learned that they were in the military, so he's sorry he said that they weren't patriots.
That's amazing!
None of the other stuff in his career requires retraction, but this does.
The first chapter of his book was based on a fraudulent document, The Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, but he's not apologizing for that.
Behold, a pale horse contained a full reprinting of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
Do not absolutely denigrate our military men, even though technically, in my worldview, they are controlled by the New World Order and they will be used to destroy us.
So there's something else that Bill is a little bit upset about.
He's got a little bee in his bonnet, and that is that Bill Clinton went on 60 Minutes, and they had an interview, and Bill has decided that he has condemned Timothy McVeigh to death.
...can believe that the conduct of those people at Waco justifies the kind of outrageous behavior we've seen here in Oklahoma City or the kind of inflammatory rhetoric that we're hearing all across the country today.
It's wrong.
What is he talking about?
No patriotic American in this whole country ever said that those people at Waco justified anything that happened in Oklahoma City.
I'm going to ask that every American gather evidence and proof and begin an investigation to find the culprits, the perpetrators, and help bring to justice the murderers of Oklahoma City and the murderers of Waco, Texas.
These were both despicable acts.
And we are going to find out who did it.
And we are going to raise a fund that is going to ensure that somebody comes out and talks.
And I hope you all participate.
This is going to come back on you, Bill Clinton and Janet Reno and FBI and BATF and whoever and however Did the bombing in Oklahoma City.
I cannot believe that this nation has sunk so low, or that we have someone of the despicable character.
Such as Bill Clinton in our White House.
It does not speak well for America.
And we're going to have to change that in the next election, and the way to do it is to join the Constitution Party.
You'll find a forum to do that in the next issue of Veritas, which, by the way, you should all be subscribing to, because it's the only place that you're ever going to read the truth.