Today, Dan and Jordan discuss the week that was on the Alex Jones Show. In this installment, Alex attempts to take credit for Trump's executive order about social media, accuses Democrats of killing people in nursing homes, and the gents discuss Alex's response to the evolving situation in Minneapolis.
But before we get down to business on that, Jordan, we had to take a little moment to say thank you to some folks who signed up and are supporting the show and do a disappointing seltzer report.
But if you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I enjoy this podcast and their literary references and I'd like to support what they do, you can do that by going on.
Go to our website, knowledgefight.com.
Click on the button that says support the show.
We would appreciate it.
Or, if you feel so inclined, please take that generous spirit and apply it to a local charity in your area or in some sort of a field that you feel passionate about to help people who are in need.
So, Jordan, like I said, disappointing Seltzer Report.
We're just going to get it out of the way real quick.
So I'll go to the store, and I'll end up getting a bunch of the loose bottles of seltzer, and then they're in my fridge, and periodically, throughout a long period of time, I can grab one, and that allows me to keep adding to the list without having to go to the store over and over again.
Yeah, and so what ends up happening is I have a number of them in the fridge.
I have been trying to find this apartment and so I've been really busy with that and going to like a couple of viewings and I haven't really stocked up on seltzer in a bit.
Ones that I've already had before that I had to buy a six-pack of.
So there's like a couple that are in my pantry that I've just been like, I'll just put these in the fridge for later so I don't drink that coconut garbage.
But in addition to me being sick of Alex's bullshit, and not that I generally pull punches, I'm not pulling any punches today, but in addition...
I feel like I would like to offer a little bit of a window into the creation of one of these episodes.
And so along the way, I'm going to give a couple of little notes that can help people understand exactly the process that goes into some of this.
I know I've gotten a lot of questions about that, and it's really difficult for me to answer the question without doing some of it illustratively through the show itself.
You've seen the meme that, oh yeah, a great white shark attacked a lady and they called it COVID-19.
That meme is a joke, but where it comes from isn't.
This is just in the news today at NationalFile.com.
We're going to post this article on Infowars.com.
Gunshot victims count as coronavirus deaths in Washington State.
This is some real original reporting.
Freedom Foundation Reports did a Freedom Information Act request, and they admitted gunshot wounds, car wrecks, suicides, and then they test you.
With the Bill of Melinda Gates UN testing kit that the FDA shut down for fraud, and the kit finds almost everyone is positive if you've had the flu or a coronavirus on average the last decade.
No, look, every organization that we talk about with national freedom, patriotism, all of those very trustworthy because you can tell they're focused on freedom.
So Alex absolutely has not read this report past the headline because he's just making stuff up about the freedom of information requests and stuff like that.
He has no idea what this actual report was saying.
In the report, they were looking at Washington State death figures and trying to parse out how many of these deaths were directly caused definitively by the virus and which might have been people who have the virus but unrelated to that have died.
Outside the hands of conspiracy theorists, this isn't a bad question to be asking, since the more precise data we have, the better we can respond to the situation in front of us.
However, in the hands of conspiracy theorists, audiences will just hear headlines and made-up conclusions.
The Freedom Foundation's first piece about this came out on May 18th, and it hypothesized that the state's, quote, reported COVID-19 death total is inflated by as much as 13%.
This number was taken from Washington's Department of Health data that showed 13% of deaths which, quote, involve persons who had previously tested positive for COVID-19 but did not have the virus listed anywhere on their death certificate as either causing or contributing to the death.
This is not definitive.
But if you read the report, the Freedom Foundation clearly has an angle on this.
Oh, no!
Such as to imply that most of these aren't coronavirus deaths.
So on May 21st, they reported an update on the story, which included reporting on a telephonic press briefing that the Department of Health had held.
The DOH statistics manager, Katie Hutchinson, was quoted as saying, quote, This is the image that people like Alex will latch onto and make their big story.
But I have some very serious concerns that this report in the Freedom Foundation is not giving the full picture about this press conference.
Luckily, I got my hands on the audio of this press conference, and I can play for you some of the parts that are conspicuous in their absence from the original reporting, which naturally means that by the time this is getting re-reported by Alex, the story is absolutely no connection to the primary source material.
So this first clip here is Dr. Katie Hutchinson explaining that there are some non-COVID deaths that get listed.
So when we talk about near real-time information, similar to our case identification, we have been releasing death information within one day of being aware or notified of a death.
So particularly for deaths, releasing this preliminary data this rapidly is really not our normal practice.
Our normal process releasing final death data, which I'll explain in a few minutes, takes up to 18 months from start to finish.
We also found that in the early stages of the outbreak, medical certifiers were really not aware if their patients had COVID-19 and did not have a clear understanding of how to complete the death certificate accurately for COVID deaths.
So because of this, we implemented some processes to connect data from multiple data systems to try to identify deaths to COVID cases as early as possible.
And to work with certifiers and local health jurisdictions to understand which cases were dying.
Over the course of the outbreak, we have been very aware of a small number of deaths being reported on our dashboard that end up not being due to COVID.
I will describe these deaths more specifically in a few minutes, and we will be removing them over time from our death count.
This is part of our regular process for reporting preliminary information.
We know that the quality of information naturally improves over time and that will allow us to improve our death count.
So here Hutchinson is saying, That this kind of fast turnaround in reporting is not business as usual for the Washington Department of Health, and naturally, the process wouldn't be without some hiccups.
We don't have time to maintain our high level of quality standards, so in order to get the best possible estimate out as soon as possible, that happens.
These firmly definitive sort of death certifications can take up to a year, and by that point, you are out of the window where this information would be actionable.
For us right now.
And so there are going to be little things that come up along the way, and these few cases that she's talking about are included in what you would call those hiccups.
So there were a few cases that are something like a gunshot death was labeled as COVID-19, but as the process refines itself, those cases will be removed from the tallies.
This is the only thing that people like Alex will hang their hats on, because it's what they need to create the narrative that all deaths are probably a fraud, as opposed to this being part of a system working far outside its normal operations, where serving the needs of the moment can often lead to a few mistakes.
Earlier, we heard Hutchinson say that she was convinced that the state's numbers were actually undercounting actual COVID-19 deaths, and she says more about why in this next clip.
Early on in the outbreak where a death certificate might have something like pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome and the certifier was unaware that the person could have been COVID positive.
So it's unclear.
We currently in our system, we have about 3,000 death certificates that indicate symptoms similar to COVID-19.
It's unclear whether any of these could be COVID-19 related.
If you have an interest in the less than five deaths that were miscategorized as COVID, shouldn't you be way more worried about the possibility that there are 3,000 more deaths that aren't listed as the virus but totally could be?
I refuse to believe any sincere person could hear this press conference and come away with the impression that the less-than-five deaths is the headline, unless they were cherry-picking, and their whole goal is to provide cover for shameless hacks like Alex Jones to yell about how the whole virus is a hoax and everyone needs to go back to work.
And thus, it should come as no surprise to literally anyone that the Freedom Foundation is a free-market think tank that's almost entirely bankrolled by conservative billionaires.
They're big recipients of money from the Cokes, from the Donors Trust, as well as from the Bradley Foundation and the Scafes.
They're little more than an anti-union, anti-worker agitating policy house, which is paid by the super-rich to argue against them having to pay their workers more.
For instance, in 2014, they released a policy paper arguing against mandatory sick leave rules for employees.
That same year, The Guardian released a fundraising letter that the foundation put out that said, quote, The Freedom Foundation has a proven plan for bankrupting and defeating government unions through education, litigation, legislation, and community activation.
They've also been militantly opposed to raises in the minimum wage laws.
The Freedom Foundation is exactly the sort of place you would expect to hear this kind of shit from.
They're bought and paid for mouthpieces of the people who aren't worried about the virus except in terms of it keeping people home from work.
I know I don't need to spell this out for you, but to make things perfectly clear, these people are paid by billionaires to make everyone else's lives worse.
They write things like this COVID-19 Washington story, not because they're uncovering some truth about these less than five deaths, but because it helps shift the conversation and it gives cover for politicians to put workers at risk.
The dead giveaway is their funding, but also the fact that their article doesn't mention the 3,000 death certificates that aren't listed as COVID but might be cases.
The omission of that information is proof positive that they took what they wanted from the press conference and ignored the part that was inconvenient for them.
They produce this seemingly professional piece with a snazzy headline, and then Alex and Rush and Hannity can report on the headline, and that's all anyone will hear.
They won't go find the actual press conference and listen to it.
So this is Alex's defense and sort of support for his other prong of the narrative, which is this Washington five deaths or whatever narrative.
I suspect that Alex is taking this story from the Washington Times, since that's a favorite source of his, and they seem to have an article about this.
Alex seemed to miss this part of that article, though.
Quote, Mr. Haynes' name was later omitted from the newspaper's dramatic front-page list of nearly 1,000 names under the banner headline, quote, U.S. deaths near 100,000, an incalculable loss.
The New York Times issued a correction, and they fixed this before the late edition went out.
These sorts of mistakes and oversights can happen, and the Times did what they're supposed to in that situation.
They owned up to the error, made a statement to correct their mistake, and published an updated version.
Something tells me that this was a solitary error in their list because I have a hunch that conspiracy sleuths probably googled every one of those names to see if they could find things to yell about and they got this one.
Anyway, the point here is that the Times made a mistake and they responded appropriately.
I'll take Alex seriously about this complaint about other media outlets making errors once he issues a correction properly.
Maybe about the whole FDA closing down the lab story that he mentioned earlier.
That's why 80% in the United States of COVID-19 deaths are over the age of 85. Look it up for yourself.
It's the same thing in Europe.
It's the same thing everywhere because it's a fraud.
You die when you've got all these other diseases and kidney failure and liver failure and lung cancer and bone cancer and brain cancer and they come in and stick a test in you that's designed to be a fraud when you croak and they say it's COVID so you can scare the living Daylights out of the public.
The total at that point with their data set was 62,613 deaths, which would make the population over 85 represent 32.3% of the COVID-19 deaths, which is just shy of the 80% figure.
That age group is the highest overall individual group, but the 75 to 84 age group represents 27% of the deaths, and 65 to 74 is 21% of the deaths.
The numbers drop off from there, but the population between the ages of 55 and 64 is still 12%.
Anyway, my point here is that Alex is making up numbers, because the actual numbers are contradictory to his narratives.
Also, if Alex is to be believed, there's a very important question that he needs to answer.
He's alleging that these evil globalists are just taking everyone who's over 85, who gets sick and dies of natural causes, and they call it COVID-19 to scare everyone.
This seems to be him leaning closer to the deepness.
There is no virus.
But leaving that aside, he now has to explain why there are so many more people dying this year than usual.
If it was just a thing where they're just classifying natural cause deaths as COVID-19 to scare you, then you'd expect the same number of deaths as other years that'd just all be COVID deaths.
And that is not what you're seeing.
The CDC put out a report on May 15th which calculated that just in New York City, from March 11th to May 2nd, there were 24,172 excess deaths compared to long-term averages for that period of time.
It's really hard to get a clear picture of things right now, but some of the indications are looking like when the dust settles, we'll be looking at larger numbers than we're seeing now.
But even without nailing out precise specifics, I would like Alex to explain those excess deaths.
Anyway, Alex believes that the COVID situation, all of this, all the masks and, you know, business clothes and what have you, it's to make us not stand up.
Every grocery store I go in, every gas station I go into, every restaurant I go into now that they're reopened partially, when the waitress walks up, I say, you can take that mask off.
Well, we were ordered to, and I say, but you know they're counting every death.
And he's going to build on it and try and create a narrative that the Democrats are trying to ship young people with COVID-19 into nursing homes in order to kill off the old people.
And so, oh, if the whole nursing home gets COVID-19, that's 13,000 smackers per person.
And then, woo, lordy, lordy, lordy, when a bunch of the Alzheimer's patients that are 90 years old on average, when they get that COVID, they said, the UN set the standards.
Snake a tube down their throat, intubate them.
39,000 sweetsies.
But you got...
To put the poison in.
So, it's hard to get people already in a nursing home sick, so you find people in the community that have it, you get them tested, and then you ship that weapon like the British troops giving the Native Americans smallpox blankets that had smallpox on it.
So, according to Alex, this young man, this 20-year-old guy in Detroit, you know, he was in the hospital because he tested positive for coronavirus, and that's not really true.
This is meant to imply that he tested positive, and then he was sent there intentionally to infect elderly people so the doctors could scam Medicare or something.
Obviously, Westwood Nursing Center cannot release this guy's medical information, but they did comment that he was a temporary patient there to quote, undergo rehabilitation and recovery.
There are more specifics, but if you combine that with what his family has said, like that he has the mental state of a 12-year-old and suffers from mental illness, it seems very likely that he was there for rehabilitation on one of those grounds.
According to Fox 2 Detroit, he'd been in a mental health facility in Ann Arbor, but was diagnosed with COVID-19 and was, quote, supposed to be taken to another facility to be quarantined.
From all indications that I can see here, what happened is likely a complete breakdown of responsibilities.
It seems entirely possible that there was a failure in communicating between facilities about his diagnosis, and further, his father has said, quote, had I known he was there, I would have never consented to it.
Anyway, the point here is that Alex can in no way back up his claim that they're sending young people with COVID-19 to nursing homes to intentionally infect the elderly so someone can make money off Medicare.
That's an example of him taking some of the details of this story Twisting them and writing them into a grander plot that he's pretending he's uncovered all over the place.
And it's going to get even worse once we realize...
Something down the line that would preclude them from behaving this way.
But, you know, Alex is really swinging for it.
I mean, this is just really dangerous stuff because there's a, you know, I don't know what the odds are, but there's a possibility that people in Alex's audience have lost family members, maybe even have some family members who are in nursing homes, that kind of thing.
We don't need to go over that too much, but I keep this clip in because he freaks out like a little baby about it, and then he tries to focus on the stories about how there's all these fake diagnoses of COVID-19, and I think you'll very quickly realize that he's not prepared to even do his own show.
Because we're going to put an engineered cold virus out that we own.
And we're going to kill a bunch of people and a bunch of other people that didn't die, that died in car wrecks and gunshot wounds and stabbings and cancer and heart attacks and dog bites.
We're going to count them all as COVID-19, baby.
Look at these articles.
Gunshot victims count as coronavirus deaths in Washington State.
Sixth name on New York Times' list of coronavirus victims is...
27-year-old man who was murdered.
Then you go deeper and the whole list is just full of people.
I mean, they'll put you on the list if you died in a car wreck or a gunshot wound.
And here's another one.
Gunshot victims count as coronavirus death in Washington State.
So you can kind of see there at the end how Alex operates.
Obviously, the thing he planned to rant about today is the whole idea of gunshot victims being countered as COVID deaths, and that's all good and well, but he doesn't do any prep work, and it's painfully obvious there.
I have no doubt that he shows up to the studio ten minutes before the show, sees a couple headlines, and is like, I can work with that.
He has a narrative built up in his head where he has all the proof, but when the rubber meets the road, this is what you have.
You have two headlines, complete fabrications about both, and then reading the same headline a second time without realizing it's the same story.
Alex just has absolutely zero familiarity with the topics he's covering past the surface headline level, and it shows.
And it's just a bummer.
I would say that he should retire so some hungry, competent conspiracy weirdo could come in and take his place in the pecking order, but I don't think there's anyone to do that.
He still should probably retire, though, because this is getting depressing to watch.
The default position is keep infectious patients away from the nursing homes and Democrats in unison and globalists from Europe to Australia to the United States.
I've been really pissed behind the scenes because I hadn't been really telling you what I really thought.
These people are murdering us.
And I tell you, we sit there and put up with them killing these unborn babies and these little kids and keeping these babies alive and taking their organs and killing all these old people!
We deserve whatever the hell we get.
And let me tell you, we're going to get it.
But man, I look at the eyes of that governor.
That woman's the most evil-looking person.
She's more evil-looking than Hillary Clinton.
People say, if you have any discernment, you see the evil.
Some people go, watch Joan C. and Brian Stelter that looks evil.
Are you joking?
Pull up the governor of Michigan, just a random photo of her on screen with those crazy eyes.
You watch her, you think, oh, that's just a crazy photo.
Or like how we make fun of some of these ads that he does, but if I point it out every time, it's like, well, that'll end up hurting the quality of our show.
We can't never talk about it.
So every now and again, I gotta throw in something like this so you can be like, holy shit, this is what the show is like.
So anyway, Alex has the story about Gretchen Widmer a little bit wrong.
The Michigan governor didn't demand that COVID-19 cases be sent to nursing homes.
However, she did sign an executive order in April which, quote, mandated that nursing homes with less than 80% capacity create dedicated isolation units for COVID-19 affected residents.
An MLive article about this from April 15th makes it clear that what the order was seeking to achieve was to create safe, separate areas in long-term care facilities where it was possible.
And in cases where it was not possible to transfer patients who tested positive to, quote, a facility in the region that has one, which would be a dedicated unit.
These facilities where people who tested positive for COVID-19 would be sent to be, quote, regional hubs that will only provide care to residents who have tested positive for the disease.
Alex is trying to twist that wording into being that they were, you know, to become regional hubs for anyone who tested positive, which isn't the case.
Sure.
unidentified
This was about nursing homes being required, if possible, to set up separate areas to treat residents who tested positive who still need specialized care.
It's an idea and an approach to a challenging problem.
I've read the executive order, and if their goal was to actively spread the virus in the homes, they put some roadblocks up.
For one, the executive order, it makes it so any employee at any long-term care facility who as much as displays, quote, one or more of the principal symptoms for COVID-19 should remain in their homes or places of residence, and that their employers shall not discharge, discipline, or otherwise retaliate against them for doing so.
Seems like you wouldn't offer that to workers if you were just looking to spread a virus.
Like, it would be easy to leave that paragraph out.
All that's going on here is that Governor Whitmer is someone who Trump has targeted in the past, so she's one of the big villains for Alex right now.
I don't know what I think entirely of the executive order, because fully evaluating it is far beyond my pay grade.
But what I can say is that nothing in it is about sending infected persons to nursing homes to intentionally infect people.
That's just some bullshit that Alex has dreamed up to make himself mad.
If I had to guess, I would assume that Alex just recently read a headline about how Whitmer amended the order to give facilities more flexibility, getting rid of the 80% capacity rule to allow places to be like, well, we can set up a unit.
Well, we can't.
Okay, that's fine.
You can set one up here.
I think he probably just heard about that and just got mad about it.
And I think he's just looking for ways to escalate something.
And this is where I want to give the second glimpse into the creation of these episodes.
At this point, you know, we had that whole thing at the beginning about the Freedom Foundation, and Alex is freaking out a bit here, but until I heard this next clip, I wasn't sure if we had an episode.
You know, some thug gangbanger goes and kills an old person in their house for $1,000 of jewelry.
And, man, we send their ass to the death chamber.
We send them to the lethal injection, and we should.
But, boy!
When the government and those corporations and the Democrats roll up their sleeves and go to town on some old people to make fifty-something thousand dollars off of everyone they murder!
They're killing people all over the damn country, hundreds of them a day, to jack their numbers up.
These people aren't a political party.
They're a group of satanic demons who've promoted worse and worse people into power positions where you now watch a Democrat event and men, women, black, white, old, young, they're all up there going, I mean, they're like a movie where gremlins attack and they all run out with evil guns.
And you're like, this is ridiculous.
So, I don't like being under them.
I don't like being their slave.
And let's just say it.
We're all caught in their thing right now.
I don't like it.
I don't like the fact that these Lilliputians are tying me down and tying you down.
That kind of ridiculous performance that leads straight into, like, I've never heard an ad pitch where he's, like, mentioning a sail through gritted teeth.
Wherever Islam is in control, and outside of that is the house of war.
And so it's non-compatible.
But in Europe and in now the United States to a great extent, except for Trump, and especially in the UK, they're accepting the most cancerous forms of Islam.
And so here's...
An Islamic call to prayer broadcast on loudspeakers in Great Britain that's been celebrated as political and spiritual diversity.
Imagine if I bought a building in the middle of London and put a...
So, what's going on here is that because it was Ramadan, and a number of cities, you know, they'd granted a permit for mosques, which are closed due to the coronavirus.
They could broadcast their call to prayer over loudspeakers.
This was not something that just, like, went through the entire city of London or anything.
It was more localized to communities of people living near mosques.
There was only nine mosques involved in London, which is a bigger city than can be overwhelmed by nine loudspeakers.
Our fan, Abraham, told the Metro, quote, Because the mosque is such a focal point, especially this month, not being able to go is very emotional.
For my parents at home, they were in the garden and heard it, so at least they could listen to it and hear it coming directly from the mosque.
It meant a lot for them that the mosque is still there and serving its purpose.
Hopefully this will be over very soon and we can get back to some sort of normality.
And really, ultimately, Alex is just trying to scare his audience with the image of non-white, non-Christians taking over the West.
This is essentially white nationalist agitation wrapped in the comforting blanket of victimhood.
Like you mentioned, church bells ring through American cities all the time, and if Alex really wants to play fucking games, I'll play games with him, and I'll tell him to go down to State Street here in downtown Chicago.
I used to work downtown, and literally every day on my way to the red line, I would have to pass this one asshole standing there with his own microphone plugged into an amp.
Every single day, I would have to walk past him yelling at people that they were going to hell, calling women who dressed in ways he found ungodly whores, and saying all kinds of homophobic shit.
This guy out on State Street harassing people, he's out there so much that he has his own Wikipedia page, specifically because he harasses people with such regularity in Chicago.
After Trump canceled his rally in Chicago back in 2016, the right wing was going on about how Chicago doesn't care about free speech.
In response, people started posting a meme with the state street preacher and the caption, quote, Anybody thinking Chicago denies freedom of speech doesn't know this guy.
In the biggest, busiest section of one of the country's biggest cities, a bastion of evil globalist leftist demons, this guy has not only been preaching into loudspeakers for decades, He's also been harassing people hatefully, pretending that's preaching, and no one has shut him Yeah.
And I will continue to yell about the things that I find abhorrent about your treatment of the Uyghurs whenever I need to make points about you, but do your thing.
Anyway, there's also something interesting to add to this story that Alex could have covered if he wanted to, and I would like to hear his take on, because I'm sure it would be stupid, but...
One of the folks that was doing this gesture in solidarity, a guy named Ian Manning, he wasn't the guy in that video, but he's another guy who was involved.
He was planning to do this fast for Ramadan, so he woke up in the morning and he tweeted a picture of his breakfast pre-fast, which included bacon.
I wish Alex would have talked about that because at least it would be interesting as opposed to his just blanket whoever is nice to people I don't like.
Okay, we're going to finally make a solution available to your listeners that are now going to experience the hardest money ever in the history of humankind and escape the fiat money prisons.
Listen, when I said I like currencies outside the system, Just not even for their speculative value, but so you could actually get across the border with money that's yours and to take care of your family.
So when I told you I like, I get the concept of Bitcoin, I don't like the speculation, the wars, but this is what I'm talking about.
You're on the show, and I knew you probably plugged Bitcoin, but now promo code Alex here, they're going to have the damn FBI coming out of black helicopters in probably six hours over this.
So, Alex, in this next clip, they come back, and they're talking like he doesn't kick Max off the show, and I think he starts to come around on it a little bit.
But the problem that Alex has is he's not getting paid.
unidentified
I'm trying to fix the problem by offering a solution out of fiat money.
By the time this interview wraps up, it feels like Alex has come around on it, but is also telling his audience, like, hey, this is bad news, but I'm okay with it.
But just separately, moving away from that, and we'll put out the URL you wanted to put out for folks that want to get $10 of free Bitcoin, which I think as long as you take it as that, you know, cheese on the mousetrap, that's fine, folks, a little bit of a test.
You know, it's kind of like going to a random whorehouse, but no, no, no, seriously, I'm going to stop hitting me.
There are five states in the United States that conduct all of their elections by mail.
We're talking Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington, and Utah.
Studies have been done about their elections and there's no indication of any increased fraudulent behavior.
California, Nebraska, and North Dakota all allow counties to decide if they want to do mail-in ballots for their elections.
There's a bunch of other places that allow varying degrees.
This entire talking point from the right wing is exclusively about trying to suppress the vote.
If there's a pandemic going on and people have to go to crowded buildings to vote, you're going to convince at least a portion of them to stay home.
And this election in particular seems to be one where neither side is necessarily going to convince anyone that their candidate is right.
It's just about who has more folks come out.
In that environment, if you're looking to win, the best strategy is to suppress voting.
There are ways we can handle doing this election safely, but they're going to have to include some of these remote voting strategies and possibly allowing voting over a week instead of one day to spread out the number of people at polling locations.
There's a number of ideas people have floated.
You can expect Trump and his mouthpieces to resist all such measures or suggestions as being inherently fraudulent.
And please do know that their concerns aren't sincere at all.
CBS News reported last week that White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany had, you know, she's been one of these people who's been out there attacking mail-in voting.
She herself voted by mail in every election since November 2008.
It's not a fraudulent system when they use it, but it is when you do.
And the word is Ivanka and Jared, who have nothing against them, personally, are so far up Google's ass, excuse my French, that, well, let's just say this, their lips and their asses are touching.
So, if that is what you believe, then you have to believe that Trump is fine with having them be high-level advisors and have Google up their ass or whatever.
So a couple things to remember in terms of nursing homes.
One thing is that they house a particularly vulnerable population, so you would expect number of cases.
The second thing is that because we all understand that dynamic, there are much more stringent testing thresholds for people living in long-term care facilities.
than for the general population, which would also lead to an increase in statistics, because it's really important to know if they are sick.
For some comparison, in Massachusetts there's a 90% threshold that's required to be met for testing in these facilities, whereas in the general public there's no requirement.
Obviously, I'm not trying to minimize the issue.
The fact that a lot of people are dying in these nursing homes is a horrible tragedy.
I only want to provide a little context for Alex's bullshit.
Also, I'm not sure about his statistics about the ratio of deaths in nursing homes.
According to a May 26th release from the AARP, approximately 16,000 people who are in nursing homes, either residents or staff, have died from a number of deaths in nursing homes.
I'm not entirely sure.
I found a couple of things that were...
I think one of the things that was getting twisted or getting lost is there are some states where the number is much higher.
The percentage of people who are in nursing homes is like 50% of the deaths in the state.
And then in New York, it's like 13%.
And I think that what might be getting mistranslated is not weighting these numbers correctly.
I think, I'm not entirely sure, I don't want to say for sure, but that AERP thing is pretty recent.
They're in the business of knowing things about retirees.
I don't even particularly care to get into the stupid conspiracy about Democrat states intentionally infecting people at nursing homes, because honestly, it's nuts, and one of the more dangerous possible things Alex could be advancing as a conspiracy theory right now.
There's no excuse for this kind of thing, and he has absolutely no proof anything like this is happening outside of an executive order Governor Whitmer signed that he hasn't read.
His theory is that they put all these COVID-19 cases into nursing homes so they could infect everyone and thus make a lot of money by scamming Medicare to treat these new patients, and then the stake is power or whatever.
This theory is stupid, but it gets even stupider when you consider that on March 4th, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services released a memorandum that put into place additional regulations related to screening and infection containment protocol at nursing homes, which, if not followed, could result in disqualification from participation in Medicare and Medicaid.
If people were behaving in the way Alex is claiming they are, there's a memo here that makes it clear that they would be ineligible to collect the money Alex thinks is one of their main motivations.
So let's get into the documents, because I just spent 45, 50 minutes on this.
Let me just show you.
Here's the Daily Mail.
New York Health Department website quietly deletes controversial coma order that forced nursing homes to admit coronavirus patients led to 5,000 deaths.
Now, under federal and state law in New York and federally, that's a crime to officially delete a document out of a database.
Oh, and you know, Alex Jones always shows you the proof.
1663 U.S. Code, justice.gov, protection of government property, protection of public records and documents, updated in 1974 with the Freedom of Information Act, also explaining it's a felony.
And that's what they just did.
Oh, but it's okay, because you're the mafia, Don, of New York, and we're all so scared of you.
Alex is reading a statute that's completely unrelated to removing something from a website, and this rings hollow for me, considering how many things Trump's administration has taken off websites, and Alex hasn't cared about that at all.
In this Daily Mail article, a Cuomo spokesperson said that this was just a situation where there was updated guidance that built upon the original declaration, so they replaced the original guidance.
The thing that Alex is failing to understand is pretty much, without exception, all of these situations that he's talking about with these Democrat governors and all this.
These orders are about making explicit that health centers could not discriminate about which patients they would or would not accept based on their COVID status.
This isn't about creating risks within nursing homes.
It's about ensuring patients' rights to care.
So there are even rules in place that if places, quote, cannot accept patients if they are unable to provide adequate care, including staff screenings, PPE, and infection control measures.
So even in the original thing that was taken down from the website to be replaced with proper updated guidance, if these places aren't up to the task of housing and giving adequate care to patients who have tested positive, then they can't accept these patients.
And people who are in, particularly in these long-term care facilities, have specialized needs that may not be able to be helped at a normal hospital or just a regular run-of-the-mill hospital.
There might be a particular reason why they need to be taken care of by specialists.
And denying people health care based on their condition...
It could lead to really negative consequences for people who would be refused to care.
And so that's primarily what these things in New York and Michigan were about.
And Alex is misrepresenting that, twisting it around, because of course it is.
Of course he is.
And that's where he's getting into this, like, they sent these people in with coronavirus in order to infect these people.
And now he's getting to the point where he's straight up accusing all these doctors of premeditated murder and kind of insinuating that you should go show up at hospitals.
Yeah, so he does these things, and we've seen potential consequences.
We've seen the patterns of behavior that are facilitated by people encouraging this, and let's hope people don't start showing up in hospitals thinking they're going to free elderly patients who are being intentionally infected.
That's why the allegory that came on the last hundred years or so of a zombie, that was based on old African lore and old European lore, and every culture had the lore of a zombie.
It means a brain-dead, crazy person that's out of their mind that will eat flesh.
If I were a dishonest actor, I would have cut that right before he said, no, that would turn them into martyrs, because, you know, the rest of that is very clearly insinuating that any good American would kill these governors.
And I don't think that that part at the end really actually takes away my problem with his entire thing.
I mean, that's just the same thing as I'm going to kill them politically.
You walk away from that with the exact same impression.
It's just like, yeah, there would be some downsides to killing them, but maybe you should, or maybe not.
And it's the last clip because the third hour of the fucking show is him interviewing that libertarian former Satanist priest guy whose name I've already forgotten.
Twitter fact-checks Trump on mail-in voting fraud.
Yeah, you've had mail-in ballots around the world be totally fraud-written, but currently there's no proof that the 2020 election was stolen because it isn't happening for 159 days.
So technically it's unsubstantiated.
It's like saying, there's a rattlesnake I saw crawl in that hole.
It has now officially come out, not just in Australia, not just the UK, but now the US has come out, the State Department, and confirmed they knew they were doing bioweapons development of coronaviruses at that lab.
Now, that's old news.
Now it's confirmed mainstream.
You know what that means?
That means the deep state's losing their war against America.
And you can see that humanity of somebody begging for air for eight minutes and then dying, and all of us feel for that man.
I don't care if he's black or white.
There's been similar cases of white cops sitting on top of white guys' heads while they beg and say, I can't breathe.
It's terrible footage, and the officer's an idiot.
He doesn't have this knee on the guy's head.
He has it on his carotid artery.
You block just one of those, you kill somebody.
It's torturous, by the way.
One is open.
He's getting air on this artery, but the other side's not getting it.
That's why you talk about eight minutes of torture.
That guy's like, man, I can't breathe.
One side's locked up.
You're out.
The other side's getting you blood.
Man, that is painful, I'm told.
So, yeah, watching somebody tortured to death, if you have any empathy, you don't like it.
Kind of like all the people dying in nursing homes with tubes down their lungs, blowing their lungs up.
Black, white, old young being killed.
Crazy COVID patients that are black beating up white patients and vice versa.
It's all going on because we're an evil, fallen country.
Not everybody, but in general.
And so you can look at those images and then look at all the idiot images of people burning down targets and beating up old white ladies because they're white.
It's all stupid.
It's all ignorance.
And the people perish for lack of knowledge.
Burning down Target and beating up an old white lady isn't going to bring that guy back.
We have to transcend this or the globalists are going to win and they're coming after everybody.
So there's a lot of problems with this, but like I said, this is about what I have come to expect from Alex.
So in this case, the victim was a black man and the cop who killed him was a white man.
And thus, instead of it being a brutal act of horrific violence, it's a cop who doesn't know what he's doing.
Just the very initial framing of this is indicative that Alex's angle on this is going to be to minimize the murder and focus on the public backlash to what was felt to be an inadequate response.
Alex does not give a fuck about this story or George Floyd.
It's just gotten too big for him to ignore.
I can say that pretty comfortably, considering that this is the first time any of the story has come up, and this is the Thursday episode.
Floyd was killed on Monday evening, and the video of it would be released soon after.
Alex could have easily brought this up on the show on Tuesday if he was concerned about the cops' actions, but he was too busy minimizing the coronavirus and getting back to explicit Islamophobia.
Large protests took place on Tuesday, where police responded to protesters with percussion grenades and tear gas, which is a very stark tactical difference from the way the police responded to armed militia weirdos invading state buildings to complain about Starbucks being closed just a few weeks ago.
If Alex cared about this story, he could have covered the protests that took place on Tuesday on his Wednesday show, but he was too busy lying about Democratic governors trying to intentionally infect nursing homes with coronavirus for profit and interviewing a satanic libertarian weirdo.
The protests were in response to the police department just firing the officers who were involved instead of charging them with murder, and they were met with force.
On Wednesday night, there were more protests, and again, the police used tear gas and flashbangs to try and disperse the crowd.
There was property damage and a lot of chaos, but it's hard to look at the ensuing events and not understand exactly how this happened and how it could have easily been completely averted.
This situation is still ongoing, and I do not, at the time that we're recording, feel like I have enough information to fully grasp a lot of the intricacies of things.
I've been trying to keep up as best I can, but I feel like it's very difficult for me To fully understand the bit-by-bit pieces.
Yeah.
And considering the fact that we're recording here on Thursday towards the evening, and there's...
I don't know what's going on as we've been recording.
If this were reversed, so to speak, If this was a white protest, and they had done what they had done, Alex would immediately be like, this country was started because of property damage.
The Tea Party damaged property, and that's because when you try and peacefully protest, then they don't listen, then you have to get louder, and the only way to get louder and make them listen is with property damage.
So I don't know, I don't...
I don't give a fuck what any of these right-wing dum-dums have to say.
I don't give a shit.
I don't know everything, but these people should shut the fuck up.
So what's going on here is that Alex wants to take the initial inciting event, a murder of a subdued man in police custody, and say, well, that's a shame, while yelling his lungs off trying to scare his audience about scary black people looting.
He can pay lip service to the initial event only so far as it allows him to connect to his existing narratives about the nursing homes and about the 20-year-old who beat up that elderly guy in one of the nursing homes.
Even in the way Alex connects these stories, he's taking this little concession that George Floyd shouldn't have been killed and then following it up by pointing out that the 20-year-old in that nursing home video is black.
He can't deal with the story without saying, hey, black people did some bad things too, which tells you all you need to know about where he's coming from.
So it's imperative for Alex to find ways to refocus the story of the murder.
Of a defenseless black man by the police into a story that's really about white victimhood.
And the way he's done that is to equivocate, you know, bring up instances of unrelated bad things that black people have done, and to reframe stories, you know, discuss the looting and the protests in such a way as to center white people's victimhood stories as the main thing to really worry about, like the woman in the wheelchair he's talking about.
This is supremely unsurprising, and it's exactly what you'd expect from someone like Alex, whose primary existence is wrapped up in being entirely about white.
Especially compared to his rhetoric from the 26th and 27th where he's like, they're literally murdering people!
And then you look at the racial disparity in not just police violence but in the way that COVID is attacking people and it's hard not to think there's a passive genocide going on and then an active one.
And I'm glad people have some humanity when they see somebody pinned down, begging for their life, dying, and somebody callously, ignorantly killing them.
Because I guarantee you, that cop didn't know he was killing them.
Alex is willing, he's guaranteed that the cop had no idea that he was killing Floyd, but this is kind of hard to square with what Alex said literally seconds before that.
If you go back to the beginning of that clip, his exact words were, quote, I think you can see how this doesn't come anywhere close to passing the smell test, and Alex isn't making sense.
So, what Alex does in situations like this is he takes any real meaningful blame away from white aggressors against non-white people.
We saw this recently in the case of Ahmaud Arbery, where Alex made it okay to shoot and kill Arbery because the guys thought he was suspicious, and after they chased him down, he defended himself.
This is a way of softening the way in which the murder is discussed, and Alex is doing the same thing here.
The cop is only responsible for this to the point where he didn't know what he was doing, according to Alex, which is kind of a cowardly position.
The Daily Beast reported on May 28th about a man named Ira Toles, who was shot by the same cop who killed Floyd back in 2008, and there's a number of other incidents in
So one of the things that he wants to do, though, is to take those very natural human reactions, the empathy that you feel, the concern, the outrage, and funnel them to his use.
Now, I want you to take what you just saw, and I want you to think about the 56,000 people that were black, white, old, young, but mainly old, in hospitals, being murdered.
by them bringing in COVID-19 patients on purpose and then sticking a hose down their neck and blowing their lungs up to get money.
Alex only played the video to use it for his predetermined points.
He's hoping to take whatever rightful response you have to seeing the police kill a defenseless man and redirect that anger away from being focused on issues of police brutality or racial differences in policing and point it squarely at his narratives.
It's an attempt to basically take over the story by way of minimizing it and co-opting it, which is really shitty.
But that's the game he plays, and it's So Alex is seriously focused on doing this.
Shifting the narrative thing, or using this for his narratives, and also insisting the cop didn't know what he was doing.
When I was listening to this clip, I had some very visceral flashbacks to other things that we've covered on this episode, and I'll explain myself on the other side.
So, like I said, when I was listening to that clip, I had a visceral flashback.
I felt sick, and I realized that the way Alex was talking about this current tragedy and trying to funnel it into narratives about abortion, it was exactly what he did the day after the Charleston shooting.
Here's how Alex opened his show on June 18th, 2015.
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you so much for joining us.
Very tragic events have taken place in Charleston on the East Coast.
A deranged, classically mentally ill-looking young man has bussed into a church last night and basically sat there for an hour before...
Shooting and killing execution-style nine black people on a white-on-black racial attack.
And this is one of these events that I call a Rosetta Stone.
There are a lot of them that are.
But you can take this event and look at every angle of our problems through it and learn a lot.
Number one, I don't mean this sarcastically, Dylan Roof, who's now in police custody, Who walked around and posted to Facebook in places himself wearing South African apartheid attire and patches,
should have gone and gotten a job at Planned Parenthood, or gone to medical school to be an abortionist, and then he could kill tens of thousands of black people in his career and be called a great member of society.
This is one of Alex's big strategies for minimizing violence against non-white people.
If you ever find yourself caring about an unarmed minority being murdered, step back and think about abortion, which should help you to stop caring so much about that individual murder and will preclude you from ever considering the things we could do as a society to stop things like that from happening again.
You never, and I mean never, hear Alex deploy this strategy after there's a crime against a white person.
Can you imagine him responding to the Kate Steinle shooting by saying that it's terrible and sad, but consider all the abortions.
Of course not.
He used that death for months to argue against the U.S. allowing in any immigrants.
This is a technique that Alex wants to look like it's an act of broadening the scope of the story.
It's like, oh, take this and consider.
But in reality, what he's doing is he's trying to shift focus.
Stories like these two are very threatening to Alex, so he can't really handle talking about them.
The best way to avoid that is to pay lip service to the very clear reality and then try to argue that the real story is abortion.
Why get bogged down in bickering about one death when there are so many babies?
That math never gets deployed to distract from white death.
It is, in reality, his way of minimizing non-white death.
So as for this vaccine story, this is just anti-vax propaganda that's being put out by Robert Kennedy Jr.
The headline of the story is, quote, another Gates vaccine bites the dust, which Alex is interpreting as a story about a vaccine not working out, but in reality, the entire story is just misrepresenting the results of preliminary trials.
This Kennedy article is about two different vaccines that are in the process of development.
One is from Moderna, which is, of course, Spanish for mother.
So that one, the article claims is going terribly, but then the source they provide is a Moderna press release titled, quote, Moderna announces positive interim phase one data for its mRNA vaccine against novel coronavirus.
The other is a different vaccine, which is being tested on macaques.
Kennedy, in his article, writes, quote, all vaccinated macaques sickened after exposure to COVID-19.
The link they provide is to the pre-publication data, and it goes to an article in the University of Oxford's Immunology Network website.
If you read it, you'll find this line, quote, A SARS-CoV-2 challenge, 28 days post-vaccination, led to clinical symptoms in 5 out of 6 vaccinated animals, but improved disease progression compared to non-vaccinated animals.
It seems to be saying that not all of the animals got sick, which is what Kennedy reported in his article.
He's either lying about this paper or he didn't even bother to read it, and honestly, I don't even give a shit which.
He's an asshole, and he's not a source to take seriously on this issue, but Alex is more than happy to blindly accept his narratives because they help attack vaccines.
Man, it's wild that the son of a guy who's transformed into a bit of a progressive hero in many people's fantasy book on creating a better America turned into such a shitbag.
But that was about the Moderna vaccine in Kennedy's article, and that appears to be a human trial, so I don't know how that connects.
And also, if you go to the link they provide to the Moderna press release, which is what this is supposed to be sourced from, you don't see 20% or even a related fraction anywhere in the press release.
I honestly have no idea where that number is coming from because it's not in the source, nor is any indication that there were high incidents of adverse reactions in the press release that they link.
It really seems to all just be made up.
Anyway, no one is suggesting giving anyone that vaccine or any vaccine with a 20% negative reaction rate.
If that number were actually reflected in the data, that would be one thing, and because I'm not a fucking idiot, I understand that what would happen next is figuring out what went wrong and adjusting things before doing more trials.
This seems like nothing.
And it's honestly, I found it offensively petty and pointless.
Like, there's serious stuff going on right now.
Why am I wasting my time reading Robert Kennedy Jr.'s nonsense about vaccine trials that appears to be made up?
Now.
I think that almost any other issue than what's going on in Minneapolis is probably small potatoes in terms of importance, relevance in terms of what's going on in the world right now, what I would hope Alex would talk about so I could attack.
So, he's talking about Trump's executive order about social media stuff.
Now, let me walk you through this.
According to that last clip.
Alex paid a number of law firms to draft up some plans for Trump to use as the basis for this executive order against social media that he apparently signed today.
I don't believe any of it's real, but if we pretend it is, let's consider some ramifications of this admission that I don't think Alex realizes he's saying.
If what he's saying is true, Alex Jones is no longer a fake journalist.
He's no longer a broadcaster.
He is explicitly a lobbyist.
Paying lawyers to argue for specific desired legislation is basically the definition of lobbying.
And guess what?
If Alex did do what he's saying and he didn't report the money he spent, he could get arrested for that.
Assuming that he's not making this up, he's admitting to a federal offense on air.
According to the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, If you employ lobbyists and you're not a non-profit, you have to register with the Secretary of State and the Clerk of the House of Representatives.
You don't need to register if you spend less than $11,500, but Alex said he spent a lot of money on this, and it's the top three firms in D.C., so if he's not making shit up, he spent way more than $11,500.
People who are in the position Alex is pretending he is in are required to fill out quarterly reports of their lobbying activity, and failure to do so can lead to a fine of up to $200,000 and up to five years in prison.
There's an additional problem, too, that comes with this in terms of rules regarding lobbyists, and that is that Alex's show is no longer an independent platform if he's paying money to lobby Trump.
If Alex is paying law firms to lobby to Trump, then it could be interpreted that the positive coverage that Alex gives Trump is a form of donation in kind, which could be considered a gift to Trump.
That sycophantic exuberance Alex has for everything Trump does could be reconsidered as an illegal donation to try to sway the person you're paying to lobby toward in terms of enacting legislation, or in this case, an executive order.
Which could make this a much bigger crime if someone were to investigate this and find that Alex had actually done this, which I still don't necessarily think he actually did.
I think what this is, it's just his normal blowhard, narcissist, braggart self.
He can't stand to not make himself the center of every story.
But if he's not lying, he better have reported that shit.
Like, I searched the U.S. Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act database, and nothing came up for Alex Jones or Alexander Jones or anyone associated with Infowars or free speech systems, but I can see that he could have some fake business name that he's hiding things under.
That's possible, but point is, Alex better be lying, or he better fucking hope that no one decides to investigate this, because this could get you jammed up.
There was an article in the Daily Beast that I was reading that was talking about the roots of this, and I can't remember the guy's name, but they were saying that this was mostly cooked up by someone from the Heritage Foundation.
Alex is claiming that he paid law firms a ton of money to lobby the president to do something that would get him back on social media because being on social media is very profitable.
Or, you know, like if Alex Jones agitates people about a satanic cabal eating children in a pizza place, Twitter isn't responsible for him posting those things.
If these platforms have to take responsibility for the things that individuals post, they will not exist anymore.
It's the equivalent of them, like, breaking a toy that someone won't let them play with because it's, you know, the other person's toy and the last time they played together, you punched them in the face.
Because if these rules are broadly interpreted, that'll have an effect of basically disabling all manners of message boards or online community.
Once a person running a place has to assume responsibility for everything anyone posts in their space, it's no longer worth it to open spaces up for communication.
Also, a whole lot of people are really only still on social media because the individual companies aren't responsible for what they post.
If anything, removing that protection will only result in way, way more strict content rules than we have now.
This will backfire like crazy, but also, it will never stand up in court.
Alex says that China is going to move in on Hong Kong, which he is against.
And I wonder, does he not know that the Trump administration just certified that Hong Kong is no longer considered autonomous from China?
Does Alex not realize that Mike Pompeo came out and just declared that this Wednesday?
Is Alex really that unaware of the real world that he doesn't realize that his team has already signaled that they view Hong Kong as part of China, most likely as a way to ratchet up tensions with China and put in sanctions?
So in this next clip, we get back to some of Alex's feelings about the killing of George Floyd.
Now, one of the things that I wanted to bring up is, first of all...
The way Alex pivots the narratives and brings up, like, consider the abortions is something that is explicitly and specifically done on his show in order to minimize non-white victims of violence.
That is one thing that is very important and I think is essential that we highlight in terms of this coverage.
The point is, though, that the natural instinct when you see somebody begging for their life...
And they're killed for no reason is to go out as a military and say, well, what is it I see?
Well, it's uniforms.
Or these are white people.
That's at least the first step to understanding the New World Order.
I'm not endorsing anybody.
I think it's terrible.
But at least the first level of fighting back is there.
And if I can get that first level and point it at the real enemy that's engineered all of this, and if people politically stand up and say no and...
Verbally stand up and say no and aggressively put the type of energy into politics in life that it takes to go burn down a building or attack the police?
Well, our problems will be over very, very quickly.
You see someone do something really bad to an innocent civilian, and what you do is you respond to these markers about them like they're white or they're a cop, but what you need to do is focus.
See, it's good that you get mad about that, but you need to focus that right at the globalists.
He absolutely doesn't encourage people to look past the race or position of the perpetrator when there's a situation with a white victim and a non-white person to point the finger at.
In those cases, he's very much about seeing who did something and indicting an entire group.
When Kate Steinle died, Alex created an entire imagined storyline about an evil immigrant who saw her and her dad and then killed her because he thought that the dad was her boyfriend and he was jealous that he couldn't be with this beautiful white woman.
Alex covered this story dishonestly and racially for months, despite evidence coming out in trial that completely contradicted his made-up version of the story, and at no point was the point to look past the identity of the person being blamed for the death and focus on the globalists.
When Alex was covering the story, he was doing so to agitate specifically against immigrants, documented or not, and he used the entirely fabricated version of it that his perverted mind dreamt up as a weapon against a vulnerable community.
It's important to understand this.
Alex sounds so conciliatory and like he's above the fray when he's here on air saying that it's sad that Floyd died, but we need to not get bogged down in who did it and focus on the evil globalists.
That's part of Alex's trick.
It's a misdirection.
And it's so obvious when you consider how these stories get covered.
To refresh your memory, here's a little clip of Alex covering Kate Steinle's death, making up details and editorializing like crazy.
There is just a structural difference in the way these things are presented.
And make no mistake, in that episode, back when he was covering that death, Alex was singularly focused on the identity of the man he had decided was guilty, complaining about how no headlines about the case brought up that he was an undocumented immigrant.
When there was a single popping sound in the air, we don't call this Son of Sam murders and top story anymore, because Son of Sam, he was a white guy, or he was Jewish.
He just pretends to be, because that tricks idiots into thinking that he's coming from some place of a moderate mind and reasonable ideas, which helps him indoctrinate them into extreme right-wing racist ideology, and more importantly, his supplement line.
This is part of the gigantic trick that Alex plays, and when you think about how much mileage he got out of people being like, yeah, man, sure, sure, he hates Obama, but he hated Bush, too.
It's like, okay, what you're trying to imply is that he's somewhere in the middle and he calls out everybody.
No, he hated Bush because Bush wasn't far right enough.
If you understand that difference, it goes a long way towards understanding the way that Alex builds his content and how he hides the true character of what he does, what he believes, and what he wants his audience to.
It's bad, but it was really illuminating to go through this again and really have the hindsight of going through the Kate Steinle situation and going through The Charleston shooting with Alex's coverage to be able to compare these things to.
And I think that when you do look at those sorts of situations, you start to see things in a more robust way.
Okay, so what's going to happen is one of those decoy helicopters is going to create just enough wind to start a chain reaction of dominoes that are going to gradually get bigger.
Have you ever seen the ones that start real small and then they get all the way up to the big ones?
Well, rarely does an adaptation on a cover surpass the original, but I have to say, Sunglasses at Night, song by Canadian singer Corey Hart, has been eclipsed by Media Bear.
In the annals of giving improv partners, like scene partners that you really want to have who will make you look good, we're talking about, you know, like a Paul F. Tompkins.
I mean, the worst thing I had a bit all the way back in 2015 about...
I thought it was very funny, and it turned out to be absolutely true, but it was the idea of, like, it used to be one scandal would take you down, but the trick is, if you do a new one every day, nobody can catch up to you.
And it seems like Alex has that kind of thing going on for him, too, where it's like...
Sure, he committed a fucking felony two weeks ago, but he's already on some new bullshit.
I probably should have mentioned this at the beginning of the episode, but I forgot because of issues.
But I think it would be important for us to point out this.
There was a resolution in his bankruptcy case that we brought up, and it turns out that the court ruled that Alex was entitled to summary judgment.
In dismissing the involuntary bankruptcy.
And the reason for that, given in this, is that the amount that he owes his ex-wife, which is about $786,000, according to what the claims are, is less than the amount that is the value of the property that is backing That amount that he owes her.
So it's secured by this property that is worth more than that amount.
And for that reason, you can't force someone into involuntary bankruptcy because what's securing the debt could cover that.