Today, Dan and Jordan explore some issues related to the end of last week on The Alex Jones Show. In this installment, Joe Rogan says that Alex is lying about his move to Spotify, Alex indicates a lack of awareness about the country's founding documents, and reveals that he may be communicating with Trump telepathically.
This seems like a cheap thing to do, and maybe it's not fair, but my bright spot in the last couple days has definitely been preparing for an episode that we're not doing today.
And so we're sticking on Alex Jones, but I was preparing for a Bill Cooper episode, and something happened in that episode that I was marching around the apartment, doing, like, fingers up in the air kind of celebratory.
I heard something in an episode that I never would have expected.
I probably should have guessed.
I hate to be teasing like this, but I think we'll do it for Wednesday.
And we'll get down to business on that, but before we do, let's take a moment to say thank you to some folks who have signed up and are supporting the show.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I enjoy the show, I'd like to support what these gents do, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button to support the show.
We would appreciate it.
Or if you'd like to, you can take that generosity.
Twist it around and throw it at a local charity in your area that helps people.
I'm trying to find different ways to say it, Jordan.
And Joe told me about his plans, and I told him, I said, this is hardcore, man.
You really want me to tell people this?
He said, yeah, no, I want you to go on air and tell everybody this.
And so...
Joe's always tried to stay politically neutral, and he tried to get along with the left, and they have acted like total monsters, and he's done with them.
And this is an important point because Alex Jones made some crazy video after our conversation that I had with him yesterday.
Where he was saying that I'm going to war against censorship and a war against YouTube.
I'm not doing any of those things.
I made this deal with Spotify.
I made the deal with Spotify because it's a great company and it's a great deal.
And I'm excited to be in a partnership with a company as opposed to a company that I just put my stuff up on their platform, whether it's Apple or YouTube.
I don't like that YouTube censors things.
I don't like that they do that with those doctors in Bakersfield.
So he then gets into talking about how the position that YouTube and all of these companies find themselves in is something he doesn't want to have to make those sorts of choices that they are in the position of making.
He took whatever the conversation was that the two of them had, and maybe it was Joe saying something like...
You know, I don't think that it's great that YouTube is taking some of these things down.
And Alex is like, he's on the warpath.
That's a really shitty friend.
That's really bad.
Alex is a terrible, terrible person.
So, I was listening to this episode with David Pacman and Rogan, and I thought, like, well, I could do a whole episode on how stupid fucking Rogan is.
Like, he just believes some really stupid shit, but to his credit, I guess, because I can watch these things critically, he does say, like, No one should listen to me.
Yeah, and I think some people do still take him seriously, but in terms of really critically deconstructing...
Like, some of these things that he says that are stupid, it's like, well, you know, the rebuttal to that would be like, Joe says not to take him seriously.
It's crazy when you go back and listen to Bill Gates' TED Talk in 2015 talking about the possibility of a pandemic and wiping everybody out, and then five years later you see it happen, and you're like, nobody listened.
I was watching this video from Huntington Beach where all these people are protesting free California and they're running around and this guy's got a megaphone and he's like, Bill Gates is the devil!
has happened that Bill Gates, this philanthropic billionaire who's literally like made toilets in Africa and spent millions of dollars to try to get people education and millions of dollars on all sorts of great social goods.
No, but I mean, the obvious answer to that is the far right has created a propaganda campaign in order to paint this guy as a villain in order to accomplish their own ends because it's easier to do that.
It's like conspiracy and larger one-world government and anti-vaccination communities.
have demonized him for a long time and the right wing is picking up on that and amplifying it and running with it in a way that they might not have or they might have recognized or like, let's not do this at other times because of the normalization and mainstreaming of conspiracy as a whole.
Now here's the last clip from Rogan and it's this one really I love and it's because Rogan is talking about how like, you know, like, hey, you know.
It's no good that there's a profit motive in vaccines, right?
But, but, but, but, but, he is still pro-vaccination and everything, but it is fucked up that we have that, which would lead you to believe that what he's actually supporting is public subsidization, which is nice, but then he kind of runs right into a brick wall.
So, like, when someone looks for a conspiracy and they say something like, Bill Gates, he just wants a profit on the vaccine, you can't say no one ever profits on vaccines.
So that's a stupid idea.
You go, well, how much is a vaccine worth and how much profit is there in vaccines?
Then you look into it and you go, whoa, there's a lot of profit in vaccines.
Shit!
I wish there was none.
I wish, you know, they're making them just for the greater good of mankind.
But it's funny to me that people don't have a problem with that with capitalism.
But the same people that would vote right and don't have a problem with capitalism, maybe be anti-regulation, are angry that people make money off of vaccines.
But they're also angry because we're cynical and we wonder, okay, if they're making money off vaccines.
Would it be possible for them to incentivize doctors to vaccinate people more, or if they got more people involved, they would make more money?
That is a problem in just human nature, when you can make more money.
So, that episode as a whole isn't something I would do a whole episode breakdown about, but the point of really bringing home that Alex completely lied about this, and Rogan has brought it up on his show.
You know, somebody took our private conversation, twisted it, changed it, and ruined it, and turned it into a propaganda tool for his bullshit without my knowledge or consent.
So we're going to get to the 22nd, but there's another thing that I came across that I felt needed to be talked about, and that was an episode of The War Room.
Not a full episode, but a clip that Owen Troyer put out.
And I just want to put this down on wax, as it were, and bring it to people's awareness that Owen Troyer is putting stuff like this out into the world.
But he decides he's going to joke around here about how what it really is is a rally to spread the virus.
Because then what they can do is they can say that we're trying to spread the virus, but then when no one gets it, it'll all blow up in the media's face.
We don't want things reopened, so we're going to have a massive spread rally in Austin, Texas, this Saturday at the Texas State Capitol in Austin at...
12 noon, when the sun is at its peak, so that we can spread this virus massively.
And it is pastors 66 days into total martial law lockdown saying you under the First Amendment have no law, have no right to tell us that we can't be open.
Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
The first words in American government documents, once a government for, of, and by the people was established, was Congress, the lawmakers, shall make no law.
I wonder if at any point in that constant repetition of saying Congress shall not, I wonder if Alex realized that Congress has nothing to do with any of the stay-at-home orders or business closures.
No, that stuff's being done on the state level, with Congress not being in the mix at all.
The only person who's walking into dicey constitutional territory right now is Trump, when he threatens to override the state governors who don't go along with what he wants.
That is, in theory, a violation of the Tenth Amendment, something that Alex used to yell about a whole lot back in 2009.
It's all a bunch of nonsense, though.
Trump knows that he legally can't make the governors open up anything.
It's all just posturing and yelling to his base.
I don't know.
Could get dangerous.
But that said, this is a pretty big embarrassment on Alex's part.
He's Mr. State's Rights, and he's supposed to be a constitutional scholar.
But even just the very basic things he's saying don't make sense.
If the Constitution says that Congress shall not make a law about religion or prohibit its free exercise, that isn't relevant to bring up when Congress isn't making laws or prohibiting anything.
Alex is saying that the Declaration of Independence begins we the people, and that is not true.
We the people does not appear anywhere in the Declaration of Independence.
What Alex should have said is, quote, when in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and nature's God entitle them.
A decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
That's the beginning of the Declaration of Independence.
Alex legitimately seems to not know the difference between the preamble to the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, which is a massive problem, considering he's supposed to be an American patriot.
What's an even bigger problem is that Alex seems to think that the amendments are the beginning of the Constitution.
He's saying that as soon as we got ourselves a country going, we're all like, alright, let's start with amending a blank document, which is not the case.
The Constitution begins at the preamble, which is, you know, it's just saying that we're trying to form a more perfect union, and this Constitution guides the country.
Then it starts with Article 1, which lays out the structure of the legislative branch.
Then there's Article 2 for the executive, and Article 3 for the judicial.
There's seven articles in total in the original document before the amendments were ever added.
Alex doesn't know that much about the Constitution or American history.
And the amendments are the enumeration of things that the government can't do and would give him justification to fight the government.
That's all he cares about.
Anyone with a familiarity with U.S. government, like, I don't know, let's say you took a class in high school on it, would clearly see that Alex has no idea about the things he's talking about.
And if there's one thing he damn well should know about, it's this.
And so this is the prime movement, the prime initiative of the globalist is to end your right to either believe in a God or not believe in a God and make the state God.
So in terms of opening up churches and stuff, there's actually a bit of difference of opinion on the question, even among the Christian community.
Reverend Lou Peel wrote an op-ed in the Baltimore Sun, arguing that the church building itself could not be the focus of the question, or it shouldn't be at least, because the people themselves are the church.
The people are essential, whereas the building itself is important but not essential.
As long as there's a virus spreading that's killing people, it's more important to protect them than to go to a building.
He cites other folks, like Pastor David Yule, who said, quote, What are the essentials God would ask for the church?
We developed a series called Essentials and guess what?
Our building wasn't on them.
The greatest church is a healthy church.
Or there's Pastor Zach Eswine who said, quote, we don't prove our faith by defying orders in order to shake the hand of another Christian.
We prove our faith by denying ourselves so that we can clear the throat of a neighbor who can't breathe.
Obviously, there are plenty of folks who come down on the opposite side of the issue, but to pretend that there isn't a voice within the Christian community that believes that the suspension of in-person services is appropriate is a little bit dishonest of Alex.
The Guardian reported in early April about a suburban Sacramento megachurch that didn't take warning seriously.
And at least 71 congregants ended up testing positive, and at least one died.
In late March, NBC News reported on an Arkansas church that held an event despite warnings, and the result was at least 34 congregants catching coronavirus, including the pastor and his wife.
The pastor made a statement, quote, Maybe you assumed that it couldn't happen to you, just like I did.
Please adhere to the social instructions that you're receiving locally and nationally.
And then there was Bishop Gerald O. Glenn from Richmond, Virginia.
He was defiant about continuing to hold services, quote, unless I'm in jail or the hospital.
He said, quote, I am essential.
I'm a preacher.
I talk to God.
Glenn caught COVID-19 and is now dead.
His wife also tested positive, and it's hard to imagine that there aren't some other churchgoers who have as well.
Glenn's daughter said, quote, it becomes very real to you.
I just beg people to understand the severity and the seriousness of this, because people are saying it's not just about us.
It's about everyone around us.
There are more stories like this, but I think you get the point.
And they're all about the same.
People not taking the risk seriously, then when the consequences come, they say, I should have listened, please take this seriously.
The goal is to hopefully never end up in a position where you have to tell people to not be like you and to take the situation seriously.
That's what these people whose lives have been horribly affected by the virus are trying to communicate to the rest of us, and it would be wise to heed their words.
I think everything that I've read, though, even most recent polls are like, the overwhelming majority, even among Christians, even among Republicans, even among everybody, is let's stay inside and get through this shit.
But the signal boost...
From every possible journalistic outlet towards these ridiculous protests, it makes it feel like, holy shit, the entire right wing is doing this, when it's just a small vocal minority that keeps getting every bit of press they possibly can.
Yeah, I've seen some of that data, but I haven't looked too deeply into it, so I'm not entirely sure, but yeah, that was a sense I'm getting, that pretty consistent polling is showing people not wanting to rush this.
The reasons why churches would be a serious vector for virus transmission is pretty clear to anyone who thinks about it for a second.
There's an almost ritualized environment of shaking hands, of hugging, and when you consider the close seating that's almost universal and the donation basket that gets passed around, these things could be a big problem.
I understand and I empathize with the people for whom going to church is a cornerstone of their lives.
For a lot of people, the physical church is the center of their social and emotional lives, and for that to go away is really challenging.
I would never want to minimize that, and I do want to respect it, but at the same time, when there are such serious stakes involved, there are other ways that those needs can be met, and plenty of ways that the spirituality and religion of your choice can still be practiced.
I really enjoyed this quote from Reverend Peel's op-ed.
Quote, The new normal, or at least for the moment, may put more emphasis on our personal relationship to our God and how each one of us chooses to worship.
Maybe, just maybe, the new normal will be a positive thing.
It's like, yeah, all these circumstances, we can get through them, and they don't have any effect on what's supposed to be the cornerstone, which is our own connection with the divine.
Yeah, there's nothing I know more than that Christianity will, of course, be stamped out and wiped out if we have to wear masks and not go to church for a little bit.
Christianity is not a very strong religion whatsoever.
How old is it?
It's never survived anything like this before, Dan.
I don't know about what he's talking about in Europe necessarily, but I looked into the specific one in the U.S. I'm not positive that that church was burned down by a goody two-shoes who watches TV, but unfortunately it is a real story, and he's fairly close to accurate on the details, at least as they're currently available.
This is the first Pentecostal church in Holly Springs, Mississippi.
The church had defied local stay-at-home orders, and last Wednesday, someone set fire to it and left a spray-painted message.
Bet you stay home now, you hypocrites, spelled H-Y-P-O-K-R-I-T-E-S.
There's some investigation that needs to be done to nail down the culprit and all that, but based on first appearances, it looks like this was an arson committed by someone who was mad that they were defying stay-at-home orders.
If that's what it turns out to be, then that's horrible, and it's counterproductive to the aims that the potential or alleged arsonist seems to be motivated by.
Burning down the church isn't going to stop them from renting out another space and continuing to hold services.
It's an act that's pointless, wrong, and probably counterproductive.
It's interesting to think about this, though, and compare it to the other instances of crimes like this and how Alex responds to them.
Whenever there's an incident of someone spraying swastikas on a Jewish person's home or any of that sort of hate crime, Alex will immediately and without proof say that the whole thing is fake.
Some leftists spray-painted the swastika in order to make it look like there's actual Nazis around.
In this instance, they haven't caught the culprit yet.
We just have some graffiti that indicates that the person that did this did so because the church was defying stay-at-home orders.
Because this incident works for Alex's narratives and grants his side the status of the aggrieved party, Alex doesn't question this at all.
There's absolutely no consideration of the idea that this could be a false flag.
If Alex was a sincere actor, he should be speculating about the possibility that some right-wing stay-at-home protesters started the fire and left that message so that arson would be blamed on the folks who were in favor of the stay-at-home orders.
The speculation and conspiracy doesn't apply in cases like this because they don't need to.
Speculation and conspiracy for Alex are tools of right-wing, gun, and white supremacist apologia.
And to be clear, I'm not saying that Alex should speculate that this church arson was a false flag.
I don't think it is.
And I'm mostly just pointing out how weird it is that he's not playing that game here, but he does in other instances.
That's, you know, if I were writing a syllabus of how to study Alex Jones, one of the things I would be like, pay attention to the way he engages in similar stories that target different groups.
Pay attention to that, and you should learn almost everything you need to know.
When he just pulls up in the park, up on the curb, up in the middle of the park, like he's the king of earth.
If I pulled up in the middle of the park, over the curb, and parked in the middle of the park, the cops would show up like that and go, uh, are you mentally ill?
Why are you parked in the middle of the park?
Why are you out of the parking lot?
I mean, it's like, and he's got his coat with his chest out, and he's acting like, you know, he's a billionaire superstar or something, messing with the police.
This footage that Alex has of Ahmaud Arbery is from 2017, and it's not like he drove his car into a park like you might imagine, like right next to the jungle gym or the bars or whatever.
It's a patch of grass next to some train tracks.
When the police say why they're talking to him, they don't say that it's because of him driving on the grass.
They say it's because that's an area that's known for drug activity.
This is just part of Alex's white identity-based propaganda work.
It's really important for Alex to make excuses for and form conspiracies about any incidents that appear to be racially motivated violence carried out by white people, because his entire worldview centers around white victimhood.
The actual killing looks pretty bad, so Alex and his ilk have decided what they need to do.
And again, this is almost a perfect case study in Alex's racism.
When you want to understand what makes Alex such a flagrant bigot, all you have to do is consider the differences and how he covers a case like this, where two white men chased down an unarmed black man and killed him, and how he covered the case of Kate Steinle, where a white woman was accidentally hit by a stray bullet that Rick and I had to do.
We found on the ground wrapped in a rag.
When white people are the victims, it's an anti-white hate crime.
When white people are the perpetrator, the victim wasn't so great themselves and they probably had it coming.
This is how this works.
Again, it's about the differences.
You compare things that are You know, hey, your coverage goes this way one time and this way the other.
Yeah, and so this proceeds, and Alex, what he's doing is essentially trying to build a shitty case as to why you shouldn't care that much about Ahmaud Arbery's death.
Let me just tell you, I pull up in the middle of a park in the grass, I'm wearing a fur coat with jogging pants, and I'm waving arms and cussing at people and telling them F you, and then they caught him with marijuana.
Which I say they should decriminalize.
Fine.
But the point is, they didn't arrest him!
Because they were politically correct, ladies and gentlemen.
So the police in 2017 didn't catch Arbery with marijuana.
Ahmaud Arbery didn't allow them to search his car, and the police suspected that he had weed in his car, but that's not proven, nor would it matter at all in terms of the bigger conversation that's being had here.
Alex literally says that weed should be decriminalized, yet he's here using a lie about the police catching Arbery with weed to paint a picture of Arbery as being someone whose death is not that big a deal.
Also, the argument about citizens' arrest is fucking absurd.
There are rules about the use of force in terms of putting someone under citizen's arrest, and I don't think anyone could make the argument that the circumstances here justified lethal force.
I would fucking love for Alex to try and make that argument, especially in court.
That would be fun.
The whole story Alex is telling about seeing a white person in a hoodie on his morning hike or whatever, it's absolutely a fake story that Alex has just concocted to allow himself to say horrible things about Arbery, like that he, quote, looks like a thug.
Alex gives himself permission to make these very clearly racially coded attacks on a murder victim by fabricating a white person that he's also applying these labels to.
By using this term to apply to both a real black murder victim and imaginary white guy Alex saw this morning, Alex can pretend that what he's doing isn't outrageously bigoted, but it's a really transparent thing of what he's doing.
I'm sitting is, Alex just wants to say that Ahmaud Arbery deserved to be killed because he was a black guy doing something suspicious, but he knows that that would be too explicit.
He probably doesn't want to deal with the consequences of expressing those opinions.
And so in order to make this a little bit more compelling, his angle on it, he sort of reports on it alongside another story where a black youth beat up a guy in a nursing home, which is not really related at all.
And it's in the same segment where he goes from talking about Ahmaud Arbery to talking about this story as almost sort of a way to be like, look, black people beating up old white people.
So, I don't know what Alex is trying to prove here, although that is a facetious statement.
I know exactly what he's trying to do.
This story is about a 20-year-old man with a history of unspecified mental illness who was a patient at the Westwood Nursing Center.
It's awful, and I'm not making excuses for this kind of thing.
It's never okay for someone to assault another person, but in this case, it does appear that there are some side issues that are relevant to consider.
The first is the history of mental illness that was the reason this man was in the hospital to begin with.
The second is how much of that history was the staff of the hospital aware of and were they negligent to their monitoring or their care for him as a patient.
Also, in the video, the man is clearly saying that this guy he's attacking was in his bed, so it's unclear if it's appropriate to ascribe a racial motivation for this beating.
It very well may be the case that this guy wasn't in his bed and he was just mad at white people.
That's possible.
I'm not sure.
I guess.
But here's the thing.
That guy who is hitting is still alive, and the attacker is facing charges for the beating.
There are tons of stories in the media you can find about this case.
Earlier, Alex was saying that the whole thing, like, no one's talking about this because it's a black guy beating up a white guy.
That's a complete lie.
Alex is covering the story the way he is because he feels that this is his trump card for people saying that the Ahmaud Arbery killing was racially motivated violence.
I find that offensive.
Whatever the case is with this 20-year-old guy, even if he did beat up this guy because he was white, that has literally nothing to do with the fact of the Arbery situation.
Also, you can just hear in Alex's voice how much more passionate he is about a story like this.
Change the course, but right now he's going to lose for sure.
That Carvel monster is up there saying that fat ass is going to lose the rest of it.
That's the election fraud.
They're blocking everything.
They've got targeted tens of millions of brainwashers to go knock on doors under PR company names, violating campaign finance law.
Trump let the globalists censor everything.
And unless Trump...
Can get the Justice Department, if there's good people there, to indict some major globalists on the offense and rolls up some of their main opposition right now who are engaged in political crimes with the Chinese government.
Unless Trump does what he's supposed to and scares this outside globalist force to make them turn and run, Trump's going to lose.
And it's because I wanted everyone to have a taste of what this episode was like, and I thought that this was the most entertaining and also vapid stretch.
And it's that nexus point between free will and God's consciousness that God could make perfect robots all day long that carried out whatever task God wanted.
Have you ever heard that Godspeed, You Black Emperor song?
They've got this overlay of an interview with the Sovereign Citizen guy, and he's just going over and he's like, and I got this ticket, and I went to the court, and I went to the judge, and I said, listen, I'm not going to take your shit!
And all the while playing underneath it is just some swelling, Godspeed you, Black Emperor music.
And God, it would be so much better if it was Alex.
So, on the very day he's doing this episode, May 22nd, Lancet published a paper that looked at the fatality rates across six continents of people who were taking hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19.
According to a Guardian article about this paper, quote, The death rate among all groups taking the drugs was higher than among people who were not given them.
One in six of those taking one of the drugs died, while one in five died if they were taking chloroquine with an antibiotic, and one in four if they were on hydroxychloroquine and an antibiotic.
The death rate among patients not taking the drugs was one in eleven.
This wasn't a formal study, so there aren't variable controls in place.
So the differences in death rates may not be as big as those numbers suggest.
But, quote, the U.S. authors of the study say allowing for these differences, there was still higher mortality among those taking the drugs.
More and more evidence is mounting that this is not a good drug to be boosting for COVID treatment.
And yet Alex is still on that hill.
He's so desperate to defend the stupid things Trump says that he's willing to support an unproven treatment that could kill people rather than just say, hey, look, Trump is off base on this one.
I don't know what he's doing.
It's really sad.
It's really sad.
He's like, for someone who's like, you know, I'm a free thinker.
He's making stuff up in order to try and make it appear like this isn't a contradiction of his, like, really extreme Tenth Amendment shit from back in the earlier days when Obama was president.
That's all that's going on here.
Like, it's just a shitty, shoddy rationalization of a complete flip-flop on his part.
In order to, you know, serve at the boots of Trump.
It's just normal operating procedure for vaccine development to use animal trials, but it's not the law.
From an article in Stat News, quote, regulators require that manufacturers show a product is safe before it goes into people, and while it isn't enshrined in law, researchers almost always check that a new concoction is effective in lab animals before putting human volunteers at potential risk.
Alex is just making up that there's a law, but it's definitely uncommon.
These are uncommon circumstances we're in right now.
And I'm not going to sit here and deny that there are potential dangers that could come from skipping any kind of step in normal processes.
And I'm not sure.
I'm certainly not in a position where I have enough awareness to understand what kind of calculus people are making.
Like, what could we learn from the animal trials that we might not be?
They ain't got to add in how cruel are animal trials, period.
What should we be doing to factor those out as a whole, possibly?
I don't know enough.
But I know that from reading a number of articles on this, there's no law.
Alex is making that up.
And people who have familiarity with the topic understand, or at least they're expressing that if you go the normal route, it'll be 10 years before there's a vaccine on this.
But this one is particularly awful because the way in which he's being a bad boss is actually kind of, it kind of undercuts some of his beliefs and love for this country.