Today, Dan and Jordan regroup and discuss the bizarre week that was on the Alex Jones Show. In this installment, Alex discusses being too drunk to meet with the Secret Service at the RNC, tries to make Joe Rogan's Spotify contract about himself, and lets two dullards fill in for him. Also, Dan becomes drunk with power after uncovering a few new drops.
And it turns out it's also not the first time this has happened.
This happened a couple months ago, and the landlords and building managers said that they had fixed it with some tuck-pointing work or whatever outside.
In that dark moment, the fact that it's like, well, I'm preparing to do a show I really enjoy doing, and there's some really funny stuff that we're going to be able to talk about, and people enjoy it.
And finally, I gotta give a very special shout-out to somebody who's sporting on a level just unfathomably supportive and generous, and we appreciate their support so very much that I feel we need to install them into the realm of the raptor princesses.
Thank you so much, Anthony H. We appreciate it very much.
Yes, thank you very much, Anthony H. If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I enjoyed the show, I'd like to support what these gents do, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show.
Or if you'd like to take that generosity and send it to a local charity in your area that helps people who are in need, that would be wonderful as well.
So apparently Melinda Gates, about a week prior, had been on Good Morning America or something, and she was wearing an upside-down cross, and Alex is really pissed off about it.
There is a firestorm of galactic proportions going on, of truly colossal proportions, gigantor proportions, that every video about Bill Gates on YouTube is 99%, if not 100%, I read probably 300 comments this morning about his wife on a Today program where she's wearing the upside-down cross, and I could not find one person supporting her.
So, in addition to complaining about jewelry, Alex has a new study that he's found that he wants to talk about that proves something or other about the coronavirus.
Austrian study finds a sign of human intervention in coronavirus.
And that is an Infowars.com report that links to the mainline Australian news and university.
And they talk about the gain of function and the HIV delivery system added on to the coronavirus.
A study led by Nikoli Petrovinsky, a vaccine researcher at Flinders University.
The scientist and his team discovered that the coronavirus is optimized for penetration in human cells rather than animal cells, which means that the theory that it emerged from an animal market and jumped into humans is naturally unlikely.
Quote, however, the study led by Nikolai Petrovsky, which Alex bungled, professor of medicine at Flinders University, has not yet been peer-reviewed and remains inconclusive.
I mean, I look forward to some of these conclusions being challenged and looked at in the peer review process, and then it'll be fun to have Alex ignore that and pretend that the globalists are pressuring them to retract it or something.
This study is not definitive, even in the claims that Alex is pretending that it's making, and it's not been peer-reviewed yet, so let's pump the damn brakes.
Some of the stuff he's saying is just completely made up, like the stuff about this study involving his HIV narratives, which is nowhere in the study.
Also, just because it's fun, the researcher who led the study, Petrovsky, said in a statement, quote, So, the guy who authored the study said, because certain things are not present...
So you have this guy, this Nikolai Petrovsky, who put out this study, who is very explicitly saying that there is not signs of artificial inserts, which contradicts Alex's other narrative.
So if he wants to choose one of these things to push, he's going to have to choose one or the other.
And the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation threatened their money, threatened India, who's, by the way, banned their foundation, but they still have money there, through front groups.
U.S. authorities are not yet seeing spikes in coronavirus cases in places that are reopening, but it was still too early to determine such trends, Health Secretary Alex Azar said on Sunday.
Given the progression of how the viruses seem to spread and given the fact that we're still not in a good place with on-demand testing, you wouldn't see a spike this quickly.
We're going to have to wait and see what happens down the road.
And for Alex to report the first part of the story while ignoring the part where Azar says it's too early to say anything definitive is journalistic malpractice.
So this is about, like, coronavirus tests all being positive.
Sure, sure.
So this is an interesting story, because it's one of those fun instances where Alex should be reporting this story in the complete opposite, based on everything he stands for.
There's no indication that this lab in Seattle was putting out tests that give 100% false positives or even any higher false positive rate than any other test.
It was heavily funded by Gates, though, so Alex gets a little pat on the head for not making that part up.
This was a lab at the University of Washington which was running a program called the Seattle Coronavirus Assessment Network.
Basically, what they did was send out tests to whoever wanted them, people swabbed themselves, and sent the sample back to be processed.
The reasoning was that many people who were sick were likely not sick enough to go to a doctor, and this would allow people to have a better sense of their situation.
The lab was told early on that they needed an emergency use authorization from the state in order to run a program like this where they would give test results to people who submit for testing.
In March, the state of Washington gave them approval, but now the FDA is saying they need federal approval as well.
I'm not sure where I land on this.
I assume there's probably some benefit to nationally coordinated responses which make the needing federal approval make sense.
I'm not sure I understand all the details, so I'm going to stop short of having a solid position.
However, Alex Jones is Mr. State's Rights.
He absolutely should not be into this lab being shut down by the federal government when the state government already approved what they're doing.
His beliefs and pretend principles are meaningless.
Anyway, Alex's spinelessness aside, this is just a temporary hold that the lab has until they can get some details ironed out about the authorization to release results to people.
Alex is completely making up details of the story to make it sound more nefarious because he's a liar.
Yeah.
It's really just about the clearance to give people results as opposed to like, oh, everything is positive.
People need to start realizing the situation here.
When the federal government is doing whatever they want and saying, okay, well then fucking sue me about it, now is not the time to pretend that you have to follow anybody's rules.
Tell them to fucking sue you.
That's kind of the situation.
At this point, crime is legal.
I'm advocating everyone commit every crime they can think of right now.
Why would you throw an upside-down cross in people's face like that?
It's called lesser magic.
Is it?
The occultists believe that if you show it in a model first and show people and they don't understand what's happening, that you get even more power over them when you actually carry out the act.
So Alex spends a lot of time in this episode complaining about Melinda Gates wearing this upside-down cross necklace, which he's determined is satanic and lesser magic.
In that clip, Alex asks why someone would wear an upside-down cross, so I figured I might help him understand that.
Maybe they're Catholic.
The upside-down cross is the symbol of St. Peter, who is the forefather of the Pope.
As the story goes, Peter was crucified upside-down because he was too humble to be killed in the same manner as Jesus.
And thus, the upside-down cross became his symbol, an important one for the Catholic Church.
There is no satanic root to the upside-down cross in real life.
That's just something from movies and imagery that's used by metal and punk bands.
The fact that Alex goes on and on about this and never once mentions the cross of St. Peter really leads me to believe that he has very little familiarity with Christianity.
I haven't been to church in years, and I know that stuff.
Legitimately, everything else he talks about comes from movies, so why shouldn't we be surprised to learn that a lot of these religious ideas do, too?
As discussed in a profile on him in the week, part of the inspiration was the naval semaphore flags.
The flag code for N and D combined to form the peace sign, which was meant to stand for nuclear disarmament.
The other part was, quote, I was in despair, deep despair.
I drew myself, the representative of an individual in despair with hands, palms outstretched outwards and downwards in the manner of Goya's peasant before the firing squad.
I formalized the drawing into a line and put a circle around it.
It was ridiculous at first and such a puny thing.
The symbol was adopted by the anti-war protesters and hippies and we all know where it went from there.
The most popular Norse symbol for death is the Valknut, which is three triangles intersecting, and it literally looks nothing like a peace sign.
Alex is probably thinking of Yggdrasil, which is the Norse symbol that involves a tree in a circle.
This does not symbolize death, however.
It symbolizes the connection of all things, and it's sometimes called the Tree of Life.
Also, it doesn't really look like a peace symbol.
Honestly, this is just kind of sad.
Alex is just making shit up, which is nothing new.
But he's being a stupid blowhard about symbology.
It's just the most pathetic direction to take your fake expertise in.
I am going to spend the time on my show right now that I could be using to get the news out to you by just telling you that there will be a documentary that I am thinking about doing but have not done yet and probably won't ever do.
And I was at the RNC, and the night they tried to approach me, I had been drinking, and I didn't even meet with them because I'd been up all day and I didn't do it.
And they were kind of insulted.
So then they approached Joe Biggs.
And Biggs was like, yeah, she's got a black ambulance.
She's having seizures every hour.
And they say, we've got reporters.
We've got to follow.
And I go, Biggs, I believe you.
But I said, I want to meet with the Secret Service.
And they said, well, you didn't go to the meeting or whatever.
And I said, okay, man, I was tired.
It was like nine at night.
I'm being totally haunted by everything right now.
And I don't drink that much now.
A lot of times I quit for months and months, but I did get a little sauce that night.
So, Alex at the Secret Service want to meet with him around the RNC, but because he was partying, he was too drunk to meet with them, and they were offended.
So the Secret Service calls up, and I invited him over.
They said, yeah, we might come over, but they didn't.
And they just said, can you send us where these threats are being made?
I'm like, are you joking?
You don't know Phil Mudd threatened.
So the guys at Foggy Bottom are going to go after Trump.
The government's going to kill this guy.
He goes, no, he really said that?
And I said, yeah, I'll send it to you.
So I did.
I don't know if those guys got Secret Service visits, but if you're like an auto parts salesman and you say you're going to kill the president, you get a visit.
So one of Alex's big narratives about the motives for the globalists releasing this bioweapon was that there was unrest in places like China.
There was momentum growing around like the yellow vests.
Because the globalists are scared of this stuff, they enacted this lockdown to make people unable to protest, according to Alex's very stupid, childlike mind.
This is a dumb theory, and the reason it's so dumb is because Alex believes that everyone's convictions are just as flimsy as his own.
All of his political positions are completely changeable, depending on what he needs to support that day, so he just assumes, consciously or subconsciously, that everyone else is the same way.
Any evil group worth their salt would know that that plan would really only work in the very short term and it wouldn't be worth the trouble.
No villain would consider that plan.
So now we have Alex reporting that numbers from Spain that the government is not popular have come out, which seems to run counter to his narrative that the lockdowns were meant to crush dissent.
Instead of considering that maybe he just made that narrative up and it's based on nothing except his imagination, he reports it as proof that the globalist plan is backfiring.
And this is a really good demonstration of why this pattern of thinking has no way out.
Things that prove or disprove your arbitrary narratives can be used to support your narrative.
It's basically the same thing as Alex predicting globalists are going to kill Trump in the next few weeks.
And then when it doesn't happen, he can claim he stopped it, presumably by telling the Secret Service about a CNN interview.
I think it might be interesting for him to go so far in anti-immigrant baiting that he actually does what I would recommend, which is shop locally and avoid mass-produced products that take advantage of labor in other countries.
Whatever the case, Alex doesn't have the story right here.
This is about a lorry driver who'd gotten stuck under a low bridge.
A woman in her 70s helped guide him out of being stuck, and after he got out, he approached her and kissed her on the cheek.
A lot of people online were making fun of the Derbyshire police's tweet about it that said, People were saying, this is the police state!
Can a man not kiss a lady on the cheek anymore?
And of course, the police released a statement that made the situation very clear.
Quote, The incident left the woman, who is in her 70s, very distressed, especially at a time when close contact with strangers is to be avoided.
She reported it to us, and in the law, it falls under the Sexual Offenses Act of 2003.
The police would straight up not give a single fuck about this if the woman had not reported it.
She felt violated by the gesture, and the police were just taking her report seriously and trying to handle the situation.
Like, think about this.
Who exactly is Alex making fun of here?
That's important to remember, because he thinks he's targeting the police here, like they're overreacting and offended by a cheek kiss, but in reality, when he's covering a story like this this way, in effect, he's mocking this 70-year-old lady.
To Alex, she doesn't have the right to not thankfully accept the kiss of a stranger.
Alex is lying about what the story is in order to make people mad about it, but if they do get mad about it, the thing in the real world they're mad about is this 70-year-old woman having boundaries.
That's the real-world part of this, that any anger directed towards this story is funneled towards in reality, because the fake version of it doesn't exist.
Paul Joseph Watson, his videos are surprisingly low in views, but that's just because he's still on YouTube, so his fan base doesn't need that dumb site.
Alex recently gave David Icke a channel, and that doesn't seem to have been taken off nearly as well as expected.
Most of his videos are sitting under 25,000 views.
There's exactly one video I could find with more than a million views, and it has 1.4 million.
This is not something Alex made.
It's just something that he took from someone else.
I mean, the numbers aren't bad if you're like an indie creator trying to get some steam going, but Alex is a multi-millionaire on year 26 in the media industry.
This is pathetic.
But, I guess congratulations to Alex for reposting someone else's documentary and getting a million views on it.
Really a strong indication that things are working out in-house for Infowars.
I have never seen a more clear-cut, etched in stone, teaching moment to show complete, crystal-clear fraud.
A Rosetta Stone, a skeleton key.
A masterclass.
A masterpiece of on its face lies, treason, arrogance, deception, and rejection of ignorance and superstition and fear of ideas and fear of communication, which the universities have now been inverted from the pentacle of empowering humanity to the pentagram of inverting silencing debate.
So Alex makes a few points there that I'd like to address.
He says that hydroxychloroquine is one of the only known treatments that works for respiratory illness.
So I consulted RT Magazine about this claim, which does not stand for Russia Today.
It's actually respiratory therapy.
In their article, quote, pharmacological treatment of respiratory disorders, you may be surprised to learn that neither hydroxychloroquine nor chloroquine comes up.
There are so many medications that are used to treat respiratory illnesses, and those two are not on the list.
Just think about all the inhaler-based things like albuterol, and then add some corticosteroids and all sorts of other meds, and you have an idea of the different strategies doctors have to deal with respiratory conditions.
It is true that hydroxychloroquine is prescribed for lupus under the name Plaquenil.
That's really one of the big reasons why it's a bad idea to cause a run on this medication, because it's only going to hurt people who need it for their conditions.
But Alex doesn't seem to understand or care about that dynamic.
Either way, antimalarial drugs are only part of the approach towards managing lupus.
Treatment and management of lupus is a complicated game, and if you go to lupus.org, you can read up on the various medications that are used to help people with the condition, including steroids, anti-inflammatories, and anticoagulants.
Alex's claim that hydroxychloroquine is one of the only treatments for lupus is painfully reductive and a pretty strong indication that he has no idea what he's talking about.
He then goes on to assert that there are hundreds and hundreds of studies that show that the medication is perfect in its effectiveness, provided that it's taken in the early stages after catching the coronavirus.
There aren't hundreds of stories about chloroquine and coronavirus, period.
He's just making that shit up.
Most of the recent studies show that it is not effective at all and possibly dangerous.
A few days before Alex recorded this episode, two new studies were published in BMJ, which, quote, found that when compared with standard treatment, the use of hydroxychloroquine did not increase the likelihood of virus elimination in Chinese patients with mild to moderate COVID-19, nor did it have any effect on reducing admissions to intensive care or death in French patients with more severe illness.
Both studies found a higher rate of adverse events in patients treated with the drug.
I understand that it's Alex's job to run Trump defense whenever he says something stupid or dangerous, to pretend that there's some kind of hidden reality wherein Trump is actually right and the people criticizing him are the stupid ones, but this is too much.
Trump straight up went on TV and said he was taking hydroxychloroquine, which is just madness.
He's either lying, which is absurd and very hard to guess why a person would do that, or he's telling the truth and either has COVID-19 or thinks without any evidence that taking it will protect him from getting infected.
There's nothing I can say about this.
Trump is throwing around weird claims that if people, you know, they take his lead, could lead to them getting hurt or killed.
And Alex is right there, licking the boots and coming up with completely nonsensical rationalizations for why Trump said that stupid thing, and it's actually secretly smart.
So, as I understand it, there are some hearings that are happening right now about the government's response to the virus, but I don't think I've heard anyone say that it's leading to impeachment.
I think Alex is conflating this stuff and the House's ongoing investigation into the instances of possible obstruction of justice that were in the Mueller report.
There is no impeachment coming.
But we've now reached the point in Alex Jones' career where he's cheerleading for the president of the federal government, telling his followers that it's a good idea to take a medication that's been in no way proven to be effective and is possibly dangerous.
I really thought this guy hated the federal government and was intrinsically distrustful of a singular executive.
So weird how his career is shaken out.
Almost like he never really believed any of that shit.
He yelled into a bullhorn.
I will say that he's super lucky that his audience is too dumb to realize that that switch happened, because to anyone who's paying attention, this is fucking ridiculous.
I'm just so terrified that Trump is going to wind up killing himself via his own stupidity, and then the right wing is going to turn that into he was assassinated, and then we're all going to fucking die in a civil war.
Like, that's my fear now.
My fear is Trump is so stupid, he's going to die and kill us all.
Folks, they have people under criminal investigation or SWAT teaming medical doctors that give patients vitamin C because they don't want you to know that it's a disease of vitamin deficiency.
Zinc, D3, vitamin C. Major Yahoo News AP last week admitted it.
They did a huge EU study and found everyone that died of COVID-19 was...
For one, I'm not sure what he thinks is an EU study.
I don't know what that means.
But there was a study that came out on May 7th from Northwestern University which analyzed patient data from 10 countries and found that, quote, patients from countries with high COVID-19 mortality rates had lower levels of vitamin D compared to patients in countries that were not as severely affected.
The head of research of Vadim Backman said, quote, While I think it's important for people to know that vitamin D deficiency may play a role in mortality, we don't need to push vitamin D on everybody.
This needs further study, and I hope our work will stimulate interest in this area.
The data also may illuminate the mechanism of mortality, which, if proven, could lead to new therapeutic targets.
The theory that Backman has is that having higher levels of vitamin D could reduce the risk of complications, but that a lot of people would still be dying from the virus.
Nothing in this study demonstrated that everyone who died had vitamin D deficiency.
Alex is just making that up.
There are some other studies on this subject, but they're even further from what Alex is talking about, so I assume that's not what he's pulling from.
I have no idea.
This is an interesting area to be looked into, but that study is not even peer-reviewed yet, so we will see what comes from it after further examination.
Either way, literally no one is saying that vitamin D could be an effective treatment for this.
That there may be a correlation between lower vitamin D and higher complication probability.
That's the essential piece in this.
Alex is translating that into everyone who died had vitamin D deficiency.
The doctor who got arrested that Alex is talking about is a guy named Charles Mock.
And he ran a Detroit clinic and literally claimed that high-dose IV vitamin C infusions would protect people.
Sure.
According to a Daily Beast article about his arrest, quote, This is not so much a problem about a doctor giving people vitamin C. It's more the fraud aspect that the courts are concerned about.
That's weirdly so often the problem with Alex.
He misses the forest for the trees.
No one cares about a doctor giving someone vitamin C. They care if they do it in a fraudulent way.
In the same way, no one cares if you kiss someone on the cheek, so long as they want to be kissed on the cheek.
Alex seems incapable of understanding context, which makes sense.
To go, oh yeah, the study's saying the doctors tell me this hydroxychloroquine's great because it loads the cells.
You don't need it, folks.
You take 10 times the daily allowance.
That's safe.
I looked into it at doctors on the show.
Long term, not good for your kidneys, but during this, you take 100 milligrams of zinc, you're in like Flynn if you've got the D3 and the C. But they can't get in the virus.
Viruses cannot get into cells and cannot replicate when you have zinc load.
That sounds pretty bad, considering that we all know that Alex sells zinc supplements.
So the A to B on this is pretty obvious.
Even if Alex isn't saying the shit in the same time as he's plugging the real red pill, it's still a reality that he sells zinc and has marketed these products as...
Things that have zinc.
And he's literally said on the show that right now that if you make a dose on zinc, you won't get the coronavirus.
According to a 1990 study in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, quote, At low intakes, but at amounts well in excess of the recommended daily allowance, which is parenthetically 100 to 300 mg of zinc per day versus the RDA of 15 mg,
evidence of induced copper deficiency with attendant symptoms of anemia and neutropenia, as well as impaired immune function and adverse effects on the ratio of low-density lipoprotein to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, have been reported.
So there are issues with just the amount that Alex is describing, and not necessarily long-term taking of it.
You could get anemia.
You could get copper deficiency.
Your immune function could be impaired based on the 100-milligram dose of zinc that he's recommending.
He has no business making these kind of recommendations.
Alex is telling his listeners that it's totally cool to do something that's potentially dangerous and maybe possibly lethal in order to convince them that he has the answer as to how to avoid getting the coronavirus.
It's really hard for me to imagine anyone acting more irresponsibly than this.
So, halfway through the first hour of the show, Alex just starts playing a video about Bill Gates being evil that was made by this guy named James Corbett.
Just as draconian as the problems that they think that they're solving.
And again, it's like you just type in supervillain, you know, go find some lists, top 25 supervillains of all time or whatever, and just read through what their plans are.
And they all sound exactly like Bill Gates' plans.
I am going to play this clip of him talking about the thing where he forgets Margaret Sanger, after all, because he deserves us to actually look at some of his ideas.
Otherwise, we're just going to be laughing at how...
Less poverty, less starvation than we ever have had before.
Of course, if we'd followed their suggestions back in the 1950s, The crop technique that allowed people to be fed and allowed the population to grow, maybe they would have never been born.
You just can't manipulate the human race in the way these people think that you can.
So, the stuff about predictions for population growth is a really complicated thing, and it's never really just about population.
It's also about resources and all these things.
I don't really want to get into it.
I don't think he has a handle on the topic.
Also, apparently Harrison didn't get the memo that Alex is really trying to play up caring about hunger in the developing world, so it might not be a good idea for him to come on the show and say there's less starvation than ever.
Now, it's funny that he forgot Margaret Sanger's name.
That's hilarious.
But the reason I remembered that I wanted to pull this clip is because it shows me how weird this dork Harrison Smith is.
I think what put me over the edge is his theory that population control measures, like family planning or birth control, might make it so the guy who invented some crop technique may never be born.
This is so weird on a bunch of levels.
For one, it implies a belief in hard predeterminism.
One person was destined to make that crop technique, and because their parents used a condom, now no one gets that crop technique.
This is a super weird way to look at the world, and it only makes him even more of a bummer, kind of, if you think about it.
He was predestined to be the eighth banana at InfoWars as the ship sinks.
Everything in his life was meant to lead to him being the guy even I will forget about six months after Alex goes out of business.
The second part of this that's super weird is that to be totally sure that we don't miss out on any of these people being born who are predestined to come up with these crop techniques, what should we do?
Should all contraceptives be outlawed?
But what about masturbation?
One of those sperms might be the crop technique guy, you know?
If you take Harrison's weird thoughts to their logical conclusion, no one can masturbate, you can only have sex to procreate, and people need to be pregnant as much as possible.
Either that, or he doesn't actually care about that crop technique guy getting born as much as he's pretending he does.
My guess is this is just standard anti-abortion thinking being delivered by a very, very weird dork.
So, we know from a, I hate to call it this because it sounds very navel-gazy, but a legendary episode of our podcast that Alex has a very interesting interpretation of the Watchmen.
It's interesting because you're talking about these supervillains and it's making me think of The Watchmen, which is a great movie.
I never read the comic, but I really enjoyed the movie.
And I can't think of the villain's name in that.
I think he named himself after an Egyptian pharaoh or something like that.
But the character that was trying to expose the plan, Rorschach, was sort of painted as a low-life villain scum.
As if the message of that movie that I thought when I watched it was, Was keep your mouth shut and don't try to expose this because it's a necessary plan.
So, to answer these gentlemen's questions, I will start with Greg Reese's concern.
There are two possibilities.
It could be that the people he's talking about were abbreviating R-naught to R for the sake of brevity and smoother conversation.
I wouldn't be too surprised if that was the case.
However, it's also possible they just met R. R-naught is the basic reproduction number for an illness, which is to say that it represents the average number of infections you would expect to be the result of one infected person.
If R-naught for a condition is two, then each person infected will likely infect two additional people on average.
This is a concrete number that is characteristic of an infectious disease, and it is not affected by the development of treatments or preventions.
It's just intrinsic to the condition.
R, on the other hand...
is the variable that's used to describe a disease's effective reproduction rate.
This number takes into account that some people are immune to conditions, maybe because they're vaccinated, so a proportion of the population won't end up getting infected even if they're exposed to a sick person.
You calculate this by taking R0 and multiplying it by the proportion of the population that is able to come down with a particular condition.
In the case of the coronavirus, it doesn't seem like we have any good idea about large swaths of the population who are immune, so it kind of looks like R and R-naught are basically the same thing here.
I know everything is a conspiracy at Infowars, but this one's a fucking dud.
As for Harrison's question about whether or not he missed something, he did.
When someone says they can't definitively nail down the value of R, that's not to say that they can't get a pretty good sense of it from available data.
With better data, as provided by things like increased testing, we could get an even better sense of the reproduction number of this new virus that we're really just playing catch-up with.
Also, R0 is not the most useful metric for understanding the evolving situation with the virus.
If Harrison wants to put on this incredulous act about not understanding statistical estimation, and Greg wants to accidentally reveal that he doesn't know what R is, and he probably only knows about R0 because he overheard the health rangers say it, then I hope they're having a good time doing it.
This video was actually tweeted out by Michelle Malkin, and she tweeted out saying that the account that originally posted the video was deleted off Twitter, and the video is quickly deleted off Twitter.
So, figure, hey, if Twitter's deleting this video, it's probably something that our audience would want to know about.
But right now, the overarching narrative is that the globalists are desperately trying to shut down any real information that's getting out, so anytime anything gets kicked off anything, it has an increased market value at Infowars.
I had no idea what this video is, so I decided to check out Michelle Malkin's Twitter, and oh boy, nothing but red flags.
There's a video of a recent interview she did with Gavin McGinnis, then a retweet of a VDARE video where they're doing an interview with Cassandra Fairbanks, and then an interview that she did with Laura Loomer.
So I found this video, and the account that posted it is still up, as is the video.
It's just a group of like 40 people in Ireland in the middle of what appears to be a field holding up signs against vaccines.
Honestly, more of their signs seem to be anti-media, like things like quote, the media is the virus, and quote, RTE is the virus, which is a channel in Ireland.
The video has not been removed, nor is the account.
But by pretending that it was, Harrison can pretend this is somehow threatening to his imaginary enemies, which is just sad.
I've been so busy fighting the globalists and working on some inside baseball stuff that I'm taking off the next few days to work on the Bill Gates film and to get a bunch of other projects completed and major investigative journalism.
And so I've been so busy, we haven't had time to come up with a new special.
We have to end this big mega-sale in a couple days.
We've extended it because a bunch of our best-selling items are selling out.
Vitamin Mineral Fusion, by the time you watch this, will be sold out.
So while these guys have been on air, or while that video was playing on this episode, Alex recorded this shot of him saying, I'm taking some time off, and also here, buy this shit.
So this plays, and I realize it's another hour of Greg Reese and Harrison.
The information we're about to cover in the next four hours is the most important information ever revealed on air in the history of human communications.
No, he had to because he knows that no one's going to watch if those two are on, but if he sells it as the most important communication of all human history, maybe they'll stick around for that dumb, dumb, boring old asshole.
Particularly the way that YouTube is starting to become more of, you know, there's a lot more advertiser demands that are being made.
I think you hear this from a number of channels, that they're having difficulty relying on YouTube to be like a rock for them.
Some things are getting demonetized, some things are...
Just not as lucrative as they were.
And that's just a piece of YouTube's business changing its focus from where it was in the past.
And I think if you're Rogan, that is where most of your shit is.
It's a really smart decision to, instead of having this vulnerability to the possibility of ad revenues going down, you just get a payday out of this deal with Spotify, and now you're set.
There have been other podcasts that have gone to exclusive deals in the past and have lost a considerable amount of their fan base.
I know that the last podcast on the left, there was some backlash to them going Spotify exclusive because people don't like the idea that you have to get an app in order to get this content that you become acclimated to getting.
I think That Rogan has a big enough base that he can probably handle some loss, but you might end up seeing a pretty serious diminishment of his audience, and you might see a backlash from some of them who resent the idea of, like, I gotta download this app from this other business in order to get your content?
Fuck you, man!
Because, at the end of the day, quite honestly, if you want to take a cynical view, what has happened?
Is that over the last decade, or however long Joe's been doing the podcast, he has built up an audience on a free, openly available platform that has grown to the point where he now sees he can sell them.
Whether or not it's the premium accounts or not is kind of irrelevant.
You now are a Spotify consumer.
And if you want to listen to a show without ads interrupting all the time, you've probably got to get premium.
So there is like this, the way I look at it as a creator, I kind of do look at it as you created this audience and now you're selling them to this company.
But I think a more generous version of it could, and also looking at it as a creator, the struggle that Joe Rogan would be in with the uncertainty of like...
He makes millions of dollars on that podcast.
The idea of that going away because of changes in YouTube's structure or whatever is ridiculous.
He is in a position where, take that fucking $100 million deal, we're probably doing what you need to do.
But it could be destructive to him, and it also could set a precedent where a lot of other podcasts feel like they can do this.
And it could actually have an erosive and corrosive effect on...
Podcasting in general.
I'm not entirely sure.
We've got to see how things play out.
It could be a blip and it could be nothing, but it could actually have some negative consequences towards other people who have cottage industries of their own.
So anyway, Joe has said that he might move to Texas, and it turns out there's some other people who are talking about moving to Texas, and these people are thought leaders, right?
This is bigger than Joe Rogan, the number one podcast in the world.
It's about free expression, and it's about the dominoes falling, and it's about the fact that Dave Rubin, Joe Rogan, Elon Musk, they're all moving to Austin.
And they're classical liberals, not leftist authoritarians, and they're trying to escape the left.
And with thought leaders like that, we could get the left to finally wake up to a great extent about what schmucks they are.
So Alex's whole thing is that Joe Rogan is getting picked on by the YouTube people who are telling him he can't say things, and he's seeing these doctors get censored, and so that's why he decided to go to Spotify, as opposed to probably just legitimate good business concerns.
Joe's always tried to stay politically neutral, and he tried to get along with the left, and they have acted like total monsters, and he's done with them.
Anyway, Alex gets to talk about more inside baseball, and it turns out that Joe is apparently making the same amount of money that he was before, but now he's free of YouTube, and it's against the New World Order.
And then, Mike, down for this, because I want to see if you have the same feeling that I have about what Alex is describing.
The details of Joe's deal, he's making the same amount of money, folks.
He's making Spotify an extra $5 billion, $4.5 billion since this deal happened, and it's a big success, and that's great because it's in his contract.
He has free speech, but see, that's about making the industry know.
If you block people's speech, you take the evil out of YouTube, or the, you know.
You out of Facebook, if you take the people out of it, we will just exit us.
And as other companies see this, the investment will come in very quickly because the speed of scalability of technology and overnight everyone is going to move to these other platforms and you'll see Alex Jones back on Spotify.
So, when one of us is treated unfairly, we all withhold our labor in order to pressure the person who is wronging our brother, our brother, our sister, from being able...
But the thing is that, Alex, instead of doing any kind of organizing, which someone could have done at any point, like get the big creators together to stand up for people who were wronged, or something like that, you could do that easily.
Instead, they just yell about it and talk about Trump needing to take on big tech.
And granted, I don't know, I don't think you could ever do that.
I don't think it would work with YouTube, because there's so many creators that they don't really, like, Rogan leaving is obviously a hit, but there's other people who get just as many or more views as him.
Like, food videos, like the Bon Appetit videos get millions of views.
pretty much every single thing they put out.
Sure.
unidentified
So YouTube isn't going to be hurting from Rogan leaving.
But he better not be, because if I were Joe, I would consider this to be a gigantic breach of some kind of trust or friendship.
The idea of, like, hey, I got this giant $100 million deal, and Alex immediately, like, the night of, he went on Robert Barnes' show and talked about it, about how it's all about him, basically, and Joe, like, standing up to the cruel censors of YouTube.
And it's like, if he's going, if Alex is trying to say that he's going to war with YouTube, why, I read an article about this, and his content is still going to be on YouTube.
And I couldn't find the clip of this because of the house issues really getting in my way.
I would have found it if I had the time, probably.
But I specifically remember that there was a clip of Joe Rogan after Alex's last appearance on the show, talking about how Alex lied to him about what he said about Sandy Hook.
He said that he went back and looked at the things Alex said about Sandy Hook.
And Alex had lied to him to his face about what his coverage of Sandy Hook was.
The exact opposite of what Alex is presenting here about Rogan said that I went back and I looked at the things you said and they lied about what you said.
Rogan has said that Alex has lied about them lying about what he said.
Or Alex is just desperately trying to get attention, and this is the way he's doing it, by piggybacking onto Rogan's stuff, which is his normal standard behavior.
I think a lot of this is just trying to attach himself to the story because he knows that it's getting a lot of press and he does know Joe Rogan, so it does seem like there's more heightened credibility to it.
I don't know.
I think it's a load of bullshit and Alex is...
Yeah, he's just probably desperately trying to get attention that he can funnel into his revenue streams.
So I'm looking over this, and I don't remember exactly where we left off, but I'm going to say, look, dude, this is going to be real standard and basic.
But I decided to take a little dip into the Perrier world.