Today, Dan and Jordan discuss Sunday's episode of Alex Jones' show because he couldn't make it in to work on Monday. In this installment, Dan finds a new rival based on vocal patterns and Mike Adams finds a new fake miracle drug.
Last man standing matches are very difficult because what you have to do is you have to beat up the other person to the point where they can't stand up within 10 seconds.
We were talking after the show one night, and you were like, what I'm looking...
The Fiend has a habit of pulling out people's old past characters and bringing them to the fore, and then I read the next day about Dr. Thuganomics, and I'm like, okay, well, Dan knows what's up.
Because throughout it, the character of Bray Wyatt is sort of guiding John Cena through these realizations that he's the bad guy.
And he gives him chances.
To recognize, like, this thing about himself, and because of John's ego, he can't recognize it, which leads to the ultimate conclusion of John being destroyed.
It's the difference between, do you want a goofy 80s thriller action movie or horror movie, or do you want some tense psychological thriller that also gets a little cornball every now and again?
That's kind of the difference, and that's just more my taste.
So, if you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I enjoy the show, I'd like to support these gents too, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefait.com, clicking the button that says support the show, we'd appreciate it, or you could find a local charity in your area to help out with folks who need some help.
The United Nations has released guidelines written by the Melinda Gates Foundation that no one will be allowed to leave their homes or go back to work under the new worldwide martial law until you've been forcibly inoculated.
So I did not find any evidence of any of that stuff, but that's the headspace Alex is in, so that should tell you a little something.
So, on some recent episodes, we've seen a trend sort of coming into existence that is, whereas Alex was comparing the coronavirus to the flu in the past, he started to really get more interested in talking about it as a cold.
While we get into all this, I'm not joking around.
Coronavirus.
UK says 3.5 million antibody tests coming in days.
And then you learn you've had the common cold in your life.
Well, we've all had it.
So, see, everyone they're testing, and I've got medical doctors coming on the show about this, everyone they're testing who dies of cancer or lung problems or other diseases, or they're old, they have a heart attack, they're telling them you died of COVID-19 to create more hysteria.
So, I understand Alex's desperation to come up with a conspiracy here, but what he's suggesting does not make sense.
Partially because it's just scientifically dumb, but more importantly because he seems to be ignoring a very relevant statistic.
It's probably safe to say that literally everyone on the planet has gotten the cold.
Most people catch colds at least once a year, sometimes a couple times in a year.
If it were the case that the coronavirus tests were just creating false positives for people who had the cold, you'd expect that you wouldn't see so many of them come back negative.
How does Alex explain that there have been almost 2 million tests done in the U.S. and only a little over 370,000 of them have been positive?
If it were really just catching the common cold, that number would be much higher.
In order for Alex to credibly even suggest this conspiracy, I'm going to need for him to deal with that gigantic problem in the theory.
Which he won't do, because he's just pulling things out of his ass.
So he has now based this, he's established this narrative that there's a lot of false positives, just people who have the cold, and he gets into predicting a future where anybody who dies, they'll say it's coronavirus.
So one thing that's really fun about this narrative, this thing of the vaccine already existing, is that it started when Alex began covering the internet conspiracy about the Peerbright Institute, which held a patent for this vaccine for chickens, which was completely misrepresented just because it involved a coronavirus.
This is fun because that conspiracy before Alex picked up on it, it all traces directly back to Jordan Sather, who's a big QAnon guy.
Alex is in the middle of this supposed war against QAnon, but he can't even recognize or accept that a bunch of his information and narratives come directly from the very people he's attacking as idiots.
So, I was watching Alex's show from Saturday, like I mentioned, and he had Francis Boyle on the show, where they discussed this Gates patent situation.
In that segment, they addressed the fact that the Pure Bright patent is for chickens.
But then they claimed that there are other patents.
The only other patent Alex shows on air is a filing from the European Patent Office, number 1575-0093.5, which again is just the Pure Bright's chicken vaccine.
Alex has nothing, but I will grant that he has a whole lot of nothing.
COVID-19 tracking bracelets and a Bill of Melinda Gates MIT plan to put a digital tattoo that takes five minutes for a needle to stitch nanotech chips into you that can't be seen with a naked eye but under a black light that have your medical records on them that they scan on.
You can't cut it out because it's now in your flesh.
And the diets, injections, and injunctions line is something that Alex just takes out of context.
We've talked about this a bunch.
Bertrand Russell was talking about what would have happened if the Nazis had won World War II and had become a scientifically run system.
And he's saying that were that to be the case, had the Nazis won, which is a bad thing, he didn't want to happen, and they became a scientifically run system, diets, injections, and injunctions would control the population.
This is not them saying, haha, this is what we're doing, suck it.
Okay, I would say that if you're a God-fearing person, I don't know why Alex thinks that extermination of the population is warranted because people are lazy and dumb.
I think that it is ludicrous, and also very fun-slash-scary, that Alex is now coming around to this, like, fuck it, the global should exterminate everybody.
Because what that entails or what that portends is like him being way more fine with mass death.
There's a difference between the sort of moments of despair you might have of, like, we are not going to make progress.
Those are tough moments of reflection, much like me before WrestleMania Night 2. And then the darkness comes right before the dawn.
Well, maybe not.
But there's a difference between that and being like, for long times I have prophesied that my enemies would exterminate everyone and I've dedicated my life to fighting against that.
I don't know who these rich, famous super megastars are, but I do love the idea of, like, I don't even want to fucking talk to you unless you'll come on my show.
Great.
Thanks for telling me I'm right, but if I can't get any PR out of this, I don't give a shit.
Another great site that Papert heads up, and that is NationalFile.com and the great work they're doing.
And he's done a big story breaking down the fact that Fauci and others that you see up there on that stage every night have big money ties to Bill Gates.
Fauci got $100 million in just one grant from Bill Gates.
The Epoch Times is not one of the best newspapers out there.
It's a rabidly conspiratorial publication that Alex just likes because it's ferociously pro-Trump and super anti-China.
It's run by the Falun Gong religious movement.
And according to reporting from NBC News, Former practitioners of Falun Gong told NBC News that believers think the world is headed towards a judgment day when those labeled communists will be sent to a kind of hell and those sympathetic to the spiritual community will be spared.
Trump is viewed as a key ally in the anti-communist fight, former Epoch Times employees said.
You can kind of see how Alex would really be into that kind of editorial position.
So, on October 17th, 2009, the founder of the Falun Gong movement spoke to the staff of the Epoch Times, and the message that was sent was a little messed up.
It's very clear that the newspaper is an extension of an apocalyptic religious belief that looks forward to an ultimate clash with communism, particularly in the form of China.
From the speech, quote, The additions of the Epoch Times and other languages are crucial as well, for Dafa disciples are the sole hope for salvation for the world's people, whatever corner of the earth they may inhabit.
It wouldn't work if I, Li Hongzhi, who serves as the master to the disciples of Dafa, took on this work as well.
It's something that you must do.
My involvement will happen later, after the Fa rectifies the human world.
Before the time of the Fa rectifying the human world, you must save more people and allow more of the world's people to remain.
In the process of clarifying the truth, validating the Fa, and saving sentient beings, you are enabling people to survive the great catastrophe.
And only this portion of the human race will be worthy of seeing during the stage of Fa's rectification of the human world.
The true picture of the cosmos and all that has occurred since the world's creation.
After that will I commence far rectification of the human world.
Many things need to be done if this plane of existence is to be kept, for human affairs are really not so simple.
Saving sentient beings is something that has to be done by you, and during this period you are given this path so that you may establish mighty virtue with your righteous thoughts and actions.
So anyway, the point here is that this is not a good news source.
It's an anti-communist propaganda depot run in the service of a religious mission that believes it's heading towards an apocalyptic standoff against demonic communists.
And believe me, I know who's financing the lawsuits.
I know who's after us.
My God, again, Bill Gates, if you don't know, like The Good Doctor and all these shows are paid for by him where they attack me, they say it's meant to attack me, he finances documentaries where they name me, and he's behind it all because he knows I'm on his ass.
So Patrick jumps in, and man, look, I gotta be honest, I don't like this guy, but what you gotta give up to him, I mean, you gotta tip your hat to the fact that he's good at saying he has sources.
I have been briefed by insiders about what's really going on here, and what's really going on is a proxy war that's playing out between President Donald Trump and Bill Gates.
And I'm sorry to have to report to the President that Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx are stooges for Bill Gates.
Now, Bill Gates says these vaccines might not come out for another 18 months, by which point the American economy is going to be toast, by which point we're going to be hauling dead bodies through the streets.
This is the agenda.
And you know what?
President Donald Trump threw a wrench into all of this because he discovered hydroxychloroquine.
a very cheap anti-malarial drug that has been around for years.
And now we have people fighting hydroxychloroquine.
How prescient that today on Fox News, on the quizling Chris Wallace's show, he had the nerve to have Bill Gates on and also the governor of Michigan, Gretchen Whitmer, who tried to shut down chloroquine in her state.
She restricted it, just like Andrew Cuomo.
And I'd like to know if Andrew Cuomo's brother, Chris Cuomo, who says he's having hallucinations, I don't know how that's any different than his usual content on CNN.
I don't know if he's on chloroquine.
What kind of drugs are the elites getting that the people are not getting?
Like, if there were actual good human trials that had been done that showed that hydroxychloroquine was effective, I don't think that anyone would be against it.
If we accept the hypothesis that Alex knows he's lying about this, then it is hard to take his opening statements of, everybody's fucking stupid and cheap, and I guess maybe they do need to get rid of as being anything other than him talking about his friends.
And he loved chloroquine when Obama was president.
He had a MERS coronavirus outbreak.
But now, all of a sudden, he doesn't like it so much.
He's pushing a nationwide stay-at-home order.
And I refuse, Alex, as a longtime listener of you and as a reporter, to watch our freedom get taken away and tyranny imposed on us by this little Napoleon complex man and the dark lady, Deborah Birx, who was appointed by Obama.
So, Anthony Fauci's history as it relates to the HIV crisis is simultaneously a complicated one and a not-so-complicated one.
According to many of the HIV activists who worked with him back then, Fauci was initially exactly the sort of government bureaucrat kind of guy that you might expect.
But he was receptive.
He listened, and eventually he became an important ally in that public health crisis.
An article on The Body Pro discusses how, quote, He dramatically loosened HIV drug clinical trial requirements so that a far greater number of desperate patients could try new compounds, an approach called parallel tracking.
He expanded research on HIV AIDS and its treatment in underrepresented women and or people of color and gave activists and people living with HIV seats at the table of the planning committee of the AIDS clinical trials group.
The article quotes Jim Igo, who was an activist with ACT UP, who said, quote, Fauci was a sparring partner with us, then a friend.
They also quote Ann Northrup, another ACT UP activist.
Quote, I would say that at the beginning of his encounters with us, he was a pretty typical bureaucrat, making excuses for the slow pace of drug investigations and approval.
I still give him credit for turning into someone who listened more to the activist point of view and eventually became more of an ally.
There are definitely plenty of criticisms that can be made of his and any government entities handling of the HIV crisis in the 80s and 90s, but it's a little much to say that Fauci was involved in this cover-up or something.
And that's especially rich coming from Alex, who constantly has John Rappaport on his show as a medical expert, considering that Rappaport is an HIV denialist who sells DVDs of his lectures on the subject, despite a complete lack of medical qualifications.
As for the question of chloroquine and Merce, that's a completely different matter than what we're dealing with today.
For one, what Patrick is probably referring to is an article in NBC News from May 20, 2014, titled, quote, Merce Cure?
Lots of drugs might fight virus, study finds.
Chloroquine was one of the drugs that were included in that lots of drugs.
And here's what Anthony Fauci said back then.
Quote, it's a good start.
You try to stay ahead of the game.
There's a host of things we're doing.
Hopefully we will never have to use any of them.
I would need Patrick to provide stronger evidence than this to back up his claim that Fauci was all about chloroquine back when Obama was president, but now he's against it because Trump likes it.
And also, what does Patrick mean when he says that Deborah Birx was appointed by Obama?
True, she was made the U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator by Obama in 2014, but that wasn't her first position in government.
She was the director of the CDC's Division of Global HIV and AIDS since 2005, which predates Obama's presidency, and she was working at the NIH since 1986.
It's easy whenever your head guy, whom you love so much, your dear leader, has never held a position in government for you to convince your listeners that nobody else has either.
Obviously, I think in the episode where we talked about Alex's response to the Ebola stuff, we talked about how these travel restrictions don't really work.
They can slow things down a little bit, but they don't really work.
Because if you have these cases that are identified in China, you shut off travel from China, some of these cases might already be outside of China.
So you could have someone from Russia, neighboring country or whatever, who comes over.
You don't have a travel restriction there.
It can still get in.
There might be some slowing down of progression that you can do, and maybe there's some value to that, but the consequences of it are...
So it's a complicated picture, but it's the only thing Alex cares about.
But I understand the idea that Patrick would agree with that.
The fact that he's just like, yeah, when Alex is saying that anybody who tests positive for antibodies to the cold, any kind of coronavirus, is being called COVID-19.
Exactly.
He doesn't have anything to base that on.
He gives no citation, no evidence of that at all.
I don't see any reason to think that he's not just making that up.
Joe Biden, the very guy who in 2005 asked John Roberts in the Supreme Court confirmation hearing, can a microscopic tag be implanted in a person's body to track his every movement?
There's actual discussion about that.
Now, I haven't seen anything in the King James Bible about vaccines, but I have seen something about the Mark of the Beast.
And I know that these people are drawing us into something very sinister here.
All these dumb, dumb conspiracy theorists like to trot out this quote from Joe Biden during the John Roberts confirmation to claim that Biden wants to microchip everyone and bring us into the mark of the beast or whatever.
This quote that they always use, as Patrick did in a recent post on National File, is, quote, we'll be faced with equally consequential decisions of the 21st century.
Can a microscopic tag be implanted in a person's body to track his every movement?
There's actual discussion about that.
You will rule on that.
Mark my words before your tenure is over.
Can brain scans be used to determine whether a person's inclined for criminality or violent behavior?
You will rule on that.
This sort of quote is one that is begging for surrounding context.
Why don't we take a look and listen to what Biden was actually saying?
Like the founders, I believe our Constitution is as big and as grand and as great as its people.
Our constitutional journey did not stop with women being barred from being lawyers, with ten-year-olds working in coal mines, or black kids forced into different schools than white kids.
Just because the Constitution, in the Constitution, nowhere does it mention sex discrimination, child labor, segregation.
It doesn't mention it.
Our constitutional journey did not stop then, and it must not stop now, Judge, and we'll be faced with equally consequential decisions in the 21st century.
Can a microscopic tag be implanted in a person's body to track his every movement?
There's actual discussion about that.
You will rule on that.
Mark my words before your tenure is over.
Can brain scans be used to determine whether a person is inclined toward criminality or violent behavior?
You will rule on that.
And judge, I need to know whether you will be a justice who believes that the constitutional journey must continue to speak to these consequential decisions, or that we've gone far enough from protecting against government intrusion into our autonomy, into the most personal decisions we make.
Biden was actually bringing this possibility up as an example of something he wanted to take Roberts' temperature on because he thought it would be government intrusion into our autonomy.
Well, it's one of those things that you shouldn't...
I mean, you can almost always make that assumption, and you'll almost always be right.
But, you know, erring too much on the side of I assume you're wrong, therefore I won't take anything you say as being plausible.
Can be just as destructive of a view.
Now, granted, from my experience of constantly looking into all of these things over and over again, I will say that almost never is something above board that's put out by almost anybody who's an associate of Alex Jones.
You shouldn't be in a position where you're conveying information to people if you are not curious about what that information means in its appropriate context.
We are bending over backward to serve globalist corporations who will leave us in two seconds when the mass immigration policies that they lobby for give us a permanent Democrat socialist majority.
We have no reason to cater to these people or bail them out with our money.
I don't know how it's admittedly a globalist operation.
I don't even think any of those things you're saying are accurate.
Now, the thing that I think is really interesting about this is Patrick Hawley is clearly furious at these companies for encouraging immigration because he believes it will lead to a democratic socialist voting bloc.
Anyway, the distinction is very weird because he wants these businesses to fail as some sort of a punishment because they encourage immigration in his mind.
President Donald Trump is trying to scale this back and thank God that we have a Republican in there who's looking at the stock market numbers saying, we need to get back to work.
We are going to race against the clock to try to get treatment here.
If we had a Democrat in there...
This could very well be the one.
And we all know what we're talking about.
The one.
We've been wondering, is it going to be a fake alien invasion?
Are they going to bring out some kind of fast-moving cylindrical disk that they've used Hollywood to predictive program us to think it's an alien invasion and we have to cast off nationhood and form a one-world government if the aliens are going to embrace us?
Is it going to be climate change, this hoax that Greta Thunberg is pushing?
So on the one hand, he wants all these big businesses to fail.
And then on the other hand, he's worried that the stock market is going down.
So people got to go back to work.
This just seems incongruous.
And these are things that are said within like a minute of each other.
We need Trump to save these big businesses on the stock market by making people go back to work and risk to their own personal safety and each other's safety.
But also, fuck these big businesses.
They should go out of business because I hate immigration.
There's nobody that I want to support more than somebody who looks at hundreds of thousands of people dying across the world and thinks, thank God we have a Republican president who's willing to look at the stock numbers.
So one of the things I think is really funny there is Alex is like, I don't know if I want to bring this information that I am presenting as really important health information to you because I know that I'm going to cause a run on a product and I want to make sure I have some myself.
So Alex is making a completely incoherent argument here.
If you track his logic, it breaks down like this.
He loves this gun because it gives protection, but it can also be used to hurt.
In the same way, Alex would love vaccines if they gave protection, except they're being used to hurt.
The proof that vaccines are bad is that, quote, they lie about them being safe, which I don't know what he means by that.
In my experience, the lies about vaccine safety that I've encountered have almost entirely come from Alex's side.
Doctors and public health experts don't say that vaccines or any medication are totally safe.
They generally are pretty clear that almost everything comes with potential side effects, but that the incidence of those side effects are almost negligible compared to the benefit derived from vaccines.
Also, Alex and his friends constantly lie about various side effects that they imagine from vaccines.
The vaccine courts are not secret.
Outside of people's identity being kept private because that's confidential medical information that can't be released without invading patients' privacy.
We've talked about it a bunch in the past, but these payments are made not because the courts definitively prove that negative experiences possibly related to vaccines were caused by vaccines, but because if the system were set up in any other way, medical progress would be completely stalled and these people would end up losing almost all of these cases in normal courts.
The burden of proof is actually way, way lower in these vaccine damage courts than they would be in any other venue, mostly because very few of these people could ever make their case in an actual court.
Now, comparing this to the situation with people being shot by guns is interesting, because the folks that receive coverage by these vaccine courts, who are protected by them to an extent, are the vaccine manufacturers.
They have a certain amount of liability protection that the state assumes because of the gigantic public health benefit they provide, which would be stopped by having to deal with frivolous or just iffy court cases all the time.
But gun manufacturers are even more protected.
You really can't sue a gun manufacturer if one of their products is used in a murder of one of your loved ones.
The Supreme Court decided in November 2019 that Sandy Hook families could attempt to sue Remington, which is something to watch, but historically, that's not been something that's worked out, because how someone uses a product isn't the responsibility of the product's maker, generally speaking.
Alex understands that concept as it relates to guns perfectly well, and he yells about it all the time.
At the end there, he says that giving a kid a vaccine is like shooting them with an MP5, which it's not, but let's imagine that it were.
In the case of the kid being shot with an MP5, Alex would scream bloody murder if someone tried to sue the gun manufacturer, or the NRA for promoting guns, or anybody except the person who did the shooting themselves.
But in the case of vaccines, he wants to put the entire system on trial, as opposed to just the doctor who administered the shot, which seems weird.
To be clear, I think all of this is stupid, but I only bring any of this up because Alex is trying to use a metaphor that absolutely does not work, given his belief set.
Unless he's willing to accept that gun manufacturers should be opened up to liability for damage done by their product, it doesn't make any sense for him to be advocating that kind of thing for vaccine manufacturers.
If you want to talk about someone who's hurt by malpractice that involves a vaccine, that might be the same as accidentally shooting somebody.
Yeah, there's an intrinsic problem with the way he's relating to this.
And the only reason I think it's actually interesting at all is because he went out of his way to put a gun on his desk in order to make this metaphor that's poorly thought out and contradictory to what he believes.
And so what you got here, there was a study that came out recently in the journal Antiviral Research.
It was released on April 2nd.
It was reporting on some research that was done about the antiparasitic medication ivermectin and its possible effect on the coronavirus.
Their findings taken simply show that ivermectin could decrease the viral load approximately 99.98% in 48 hours, which sounds pretty exciting.
But it's important to recognize that this is not conclusive and that there are caveats.
The first is that this study was done on human cells outside the body, or what's known as in vitro.
So to take these findings and just assume that they depict exactly how the body would react to the drug if you took it is pretty reckless.
It indicates a little bit of a lack of understanding about how the body works, which is what these dudes are about to engage in wholesale.
You can get one result in isolated cells outside the body, but these cells, when inside a human body, don't exist the same way they do in a petri dish.
They're components of a larger system that has complicated inputs and variables that could completely change the results of any in vitro study you might do.
Now, this isn't to say that this test or this sort of thing is worthless, but that the results of a test like this are things that should be taken as a stepping stone.
It's a sign of a possibility, but not something that's proven.
Whatever the effect that this ivermectin has on these human cells could be undone by some biological process within the body when these cells aren't isolated.
You don't know.
It's interesting.
It's compelling.
It almost demands further study, but it is not something that you can say gets rid of 98.98% of...
So it is, like what I was saying, this is interesting, and it's not something in the same vein as the chloroquine, because those studies were pretty flawed.
And from what I can tell, as far as I know, I don't know this, because I certainly would be in no position to know this.
But from what it said on the website of this journal, this antiviral research journal, this is peer-reviewed.
But that's even reflected in the study itself, which concludes, quote, altogether, the current report, combined with known safety profiles, demonstrates that ivermectin is worthy of further consideration as a possible SARS coronavirus 2 antiviral.
The study shows that more research should be done, and not that this should be promoted as a cure.
What Alex and Mike are doing and getting ready to do is deeply irresponsible.
They just jump from one unproven miracle cure to another because they can't do anything else.
Their worldview and narratives have no depth to them, so they just have to keep moving and keep crafting elaborate and exciting things to distract their audience from realizing they're full of shit.
And also, another element to it is I think that they have to do stuff like this because the alternative is the stuff that Alex was doing on the last episode that ended up getting into...
Cause for war with China.
If you pursue that path too far, you're going to get tons of people killed through street violence against Chinese Americans.
You have to do something like this to make it so the focus isn't all on saber rattling.
And that's sad, because there's another way to do this, which is do neither.
And he's running away from the cops and he knows he can't go to a real hospital so he has to go to his veterinary friend who still knows how to sew people up and pull the bullet out and he's like, thanks man, I can only trust you.
So this study doesn't show any of those things that Mike is claiming.
It references other studies that have indicated some promise for ivermectin as a broad-spectrum antiviral, but Mike is really overselling this thing.
Also, as it relates to dengue, the study literally says, quote, ivermectin was the focus of a recent phase 3 clinical trial in dengue patients in Thailand, in which a single daily dose was found to be safe, but not produce any clinical benefit.
There may be something worthwhile here, but from the information that's available, this kind of talk from someone pretending to be a health ranger is fucking premature.
They are over-hyping this to an extent that's just deeply irresponsible.
Now, his complaint about this is dumb, but what makes it worse is then he goes on to name, him and Mike go on to name multiple drugs that are used for different things.
The process is very important because If we didn't have that process, there would be people taking all sorts of fucked up things that will kill you and don't actually work.
You get away from them, and you take some hydrochloroquine, and some ivermectin, and some fucking zinc, and you fucking hole up and go back to work at the same time!
So that's why when you talk about this good news, a single dose of common anti-agricultural drug found to essentially eliminate all viral material, that's a major study.
That you're linking to.
And people think, oh, well, they go, well, this is a new virus.
It is like people who are of the opinion that like, oh, all it will take for humanity to really come together is a threat outside of humanity that we can all unite around.
And it's like, no.
Alex Jones would be like, one, Independence Day is bullshit.
And a lot of the primary direction that this seems to be going on this episode, and I mean, obviously, anti-vaccination narratives have gone throughout.
Like, Alex's fear of imagined forced vaccines and stuff.
China, I predicted this in early February, they would try to export the virus to infect as many other countries as possible so they could shift the blame away from China.
And that's exactly what's happened.
That's all this is.
They're just trying to make sure they can rewrite history and blame, you know, Trump instead of...
Well, yeah, again, it's the anti-American hatred that's been put in place because China, you know, the social engineering propaganda is what precedes war.
China is going to attack the United States in more ways than just this biological weapon.
I obviously don't think it's going to lead to a world war, but in terms of the rhetoric that he's putting forth, you're getting to that point where it's like, well...
What you seem to want to happen is that.
You seem to want circumstances that would lead to no other option than open war between the United States and China.
And that is a hellscape.
That is something that I can't imagine anybody wanting.
And the ultimate irony, too, is that what he seems to want, or the path that his rhetoric takes you down, is much closer to that lockstep scenario that is in the Rockefeller document.
That is the summation of his entire career, as we've learned in the past three years, is scaring people and terrifying them of something so much that they work to bring it about.
This reminds me of, I don't know if you saw this press conference, but this one was not as widely circulated, but Dr. Fauci was like...
You should not take hydrochloroquine just yet, because we don't have all the evidence about it, in the same way that when I was in college, we used to butt chug, and it didn't turn out that that made us get drunk any faster.
I don't know if there's any truth to this, but I tried to look into it, and I did not find any evidence that some sort of electrifying voltage makes you drunk faster.
Speaking of blood draws, by the way, what Governor Abbott announced for Texas, you know, when they test your antibodies, they're going to track your DNA, too.
So this is also a way to just secretly steal everybody's DNA without permission.
Same thing with the nasal swabs.
When they get a little bit of virus on that nasal swab, that deep cavity swab, they're also getting your DNA.
So this is a way to create a DNA database of everybody.
So now they're trying to make everyone scared of testing.
Alex has already tried this contaminated test narrative, which is curiously absent in this episode.
I don't know what happened in the days, couple days since then, but he was crying about China sending out contaminated tests and now is not even bringing it up at all, which is super suspicious.
Now Mike is trying to make everyone scared of getting tested because they're going to take your DNA and put it in a database.
Do you not think that any time you've gotten any kind of blood drawn or anything, they could do that if that was the intention?
They need to run a different method with lower pressure and just support the lungs absorbing oxygen, not take over the lungs by forcing them with higher pressure that causes tissue damage.
So, this doctor in question is a guy named Cameron Kyle Sedell.
And he put out a YouTube video claiming that he's seeing things that indicate that this is not a pneumonia-like disease, and his recommendation is changing the settings on the ventilators.
I'm not sure if there's good data to back this up, but Alex's comment at the end there is really stupid.
Like, there is an article in, like, the New York Post and other outlets about this guy's video and what he's bringing to the table.
Discussing, is there a possibility that there is a better treatment than what we've been using?
It's an interesting perspective, but Alex thinks that this dude's going to get a ton of pushback because Alex gets a ton of pushback for his irresponsible shit.
I don't know what to make of this doctor and what he's bringing to the table.
I don't know.
I can't possibly know.
But the response that I've seen from non-InfoWars outlets isn't like, Fuck this guy.
Because it's not him telling you to take dewormer.
It's someone saying there's a possibility that there is a better treatment.
And people are like, is there something to this?
I don't know.
We don't know yet.
But Alex thinks like, no, Soros is going to shut it down.
No.
People hate you.
People hate you because of a very different behavior.
One of the other things, in terms of trends that I've been seeing a little bit, one is the flu to cold pivot, in terms of discussing the coronavirus as the cold as opposed to as the flu.
One of the other things I've been noticing a lot lately is Alex seems to be getting really fucking prophet-like lately.
Look, I know you've lost your jobs, but you gotta tithe to me because the Lord seeds and so on and so forth and Paul the White Cane should be the president.
I've got the George Soros people breathing down my neck.
I'm not giving you medical advice.
As if they weren't breathing down his neck, he would say, take 250 milligrams.
It's dangerous.
It's dangerous, but doctors are telling me, hey, look, dude, if you're not giving medical advice, don't do this.
Don't have this conversation at all.
It's useless.
There is no point to have this conversation outside of...
some sort of insight you're giving your audience.
Yeah.
unidentified
And the insight that you glean from this is like, if you trust Alex as a source of information, he's talked to doctors who are like, hey, look, this will cause damage, but you should take tons of zinc Because this is a higher zinc needed time.
And one of the things I think is really interesting about this episode in particular, and one of the reasons I decided to do an episode about it, is that you have the development of the hydrochloroquine narrative into the ivermectin narrative, and it's better in terms of some reality.
It's closer to reality, but it's still the same behavior.
It's still the same reckless and responsible behavior.