Today, Dan and Jordan check in to track Alex Jones' ongoing coverage of the news of the day. In this installment, The Health Ranger declares that humanity as a whole is finished, and Alex gets some therapy from an old friend who likes to hide in bushes.
I don't know it to be a fad, but I do know that I had pretty decent success with not cutting out all carbs, but limiting it, exercising a bit, more water.
I lost a good chunk of weight whenever I went on the I'm-only-going-to-eat-one-frozen-pizza-a-day diet, which, yeah, that cut down my calorie intake quite a bit.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, humanity's done, but I like this show and I'd like to support what these gents do, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show.
Reading all the news and all the information, this is probably one of the first times that I just physically could not go on air at the start of the broadcast.
There really just comes a time when the world's just going to have to be judged.
If I tell you what I really think about things, it's because I respect you.
But we're not going to get away with aborting billions of babies and not valuing human life and watching China, the model of where people don't value human life, and watch that become the global standard for multinational corporations who are beyond solace and not have a total Collapse of civilization.
And now they're driving around in China with giant fumigators pumping out chemicals hoping to kill the virus and the government is using it for a police state authoritarian enforcement drill.
And, you know, really the big takeaway from this is Infowars, analyzing the globalist program.
Because absolutely, with films and articles and guests and PowerPoint presentations, thousands of times detailed exactly what you see beginning to unfold in China with the coronavirus.
And the fact that Bill and Melinda Gates...
A few months ago, I had a big drill for something similar to this that would kill 65 million people starting in China.
So, first things first, I want to reiterate and stress that nothing I'm going to say is to imply that this is not a serious health issue that should be a high priority.
All I can do is go on the word of experts, and this does seem like a situation where there's a potential for things to go pretty badly.
But even with that said, it's so wrong for Alex to be doing this doomsday preacher shit.
I understand that that's his bread and butter, and without panic, he doesn't really make money, but this is the sort of subject where coverage like this could really get people hurt, whether it's from discouraging people from taking appropriate health steps or from feeding into a generalized panic.
The director general of the World Health Organization gave a press conference, and according to them, quote, this is an emergency in China, but it has not yet become a global health emergency.
It may yet become one.
I feel it's important to keep things in perspective and express our concern for the people of China and demand action to protect them as best as possible while taking steps to keep the odds low that the virus does become a global health emergency.
Another thing that's important to point out is that at the time of Alex's episode, the death toll from the coronavirus was at 17. And the World Health Organization has commented that most of those deaths, quote, occurred in patients with pre-existing health conditions.
This isn't to say that it's no big deal, but it is to say that there's a lot of uncertainty right now.
And using out-of-context numbers can be a really irresponsible thing to do, especially when you're driving people towards conclusions like what Alex is doing.
So in response to the outbreak, China put the city of Wuhan, where the virus is believed to have originated, on lockdown.
That city alone is home to 11 million people, and this lockdown was later extended to surrounding areas, and at the time of the writing of this episode, the preparation, it was covering an area of about 56 million people.
The World Health Organization and representatives of Human Rights Watch have made some comments about this not being a great thing to do.
We've discussed in the past how it makes intuitive sense that quarantines would be what you do, but most experts will tell you that it's an ineffective way to deal with public health.
Particularly when you're dealing with large geographic areas or large groups of people.
It turns out that it's nearly impossible to quarantine on a large scale effectively.
That being said, there isn't a whole lot that the World Health Organization can do if that's the strategy that China has chosen to pursue.
Another thing to keep in mind is that in recent days, the number of reported cases has jumped considerably.
Which has caused some people to lean towards panic.
However, to quote the Associated Press, Also, China is not the most trustworthy player in the game, so it does make sense to maintain a position of skepticism, given their government's cover-up of the beginning of the 2002 SARS outbreak.
But it's important to keep that as a position of skepticism, not a blind confirmation of the worst-case scenario possible.
What I'm trying to get at is there's a lot of real complicated elements to this in terms of, yes, there's a lot more cases of it, but that could not be a bad sign.
That could be a neutral sign.
China could be...
Giving false numbers.
They might not be, but they could be.
And if that's the case, what does that mean?
You don't know what that means.
Alex doesn't know what that means.
Even people commenting on it who have backgrounds in this don't necessarily know exactly the conclusions to draw.
So it's important to keep whatever you want to do.
If you want to approach this with a China, they're a bunch of liars, it's got to be worse than this.
You can have that Or you can have that suspicion, but it doesn't merit leaping to whatever conclusion of, like, we're all going to die.
No, and that conclusion is actively harmful, because now so many people are going to experience any kind of symptom, and they're going to go and they're going to fill up as many hospitals as possible with panic.
There was a video that made the rounds on Twitter of a vehicle driving on the street, supposedly in Shanghai, spraying, quote, disinfector.
I have real difficulty with this because I can find that video on Twitter, but I have no idea when it was shot, if this was actually Shanghai, who shot the video.
It's very difficult to tell at all what's going on.
The Washington Examiner mentions this video, and even they have to say that it, quote, purports to show workers spraying sidewalks and parks with an unidentified disinfectant.
I'm really not sure what to do with that video, but I definitely understand how the optics of it are right in Alex's wheelhouse.
I'm not surprised to see him making a huge deal out of it instead of reporting responsibly.
Initially, I had no idea what Alex was talking about with the Bill and Melinda Gates drill.
I have to assume that it's just kind of made up, or at least I did at the first, because I couldn't find anything about it anywhere.
I looked through the Infowars website, I didn't find...
You search for Bill Gates on there, nothing comes up.
It took me a while to get to the bottom of this, but it turns out that this is something that Alex found on a blog written by a guy named Michael Snyder.
There's also an article written by Kellen McBreen on Alex's site about this, which was pretty difficult to find because his site is unnavigatable.
Right.
But that article by Kellen McBreen is basically just a copy and paste job from Snyder's article, and it came out the day after the Snyder blog post about it.
The name of his blog is The Economic Collapse, and I should tell you that Michael Snyder is a bit of a nutjob.
He used to be a frequent guest on InfoWars, but now you can more commonly find him on the Jim Baker Show.
In fact, he has even hosted his own show on Jim Baker's network.
This should give you the first clue you need to deduce that Michael Snyder is a dude who's super into ranting about the end times.
His website, the Economic Collapse Blog, includes a set of links that tell you everything you need to know about this asshole.
In addition to the standard survival food sales companies and gold and silver sales, he also has a link to Jack Chick's website, where you can buy all of the Chick Tracts, which, if you don't know, are little cartoon books, little comic books that are designed to terrorize children into fundamentalist Christianity.
Snyder's got a list of failed predictions way too long to get into right now, but suffice it to say, he's a guy who's really leaned into pretending he hasn't been wrong a million times.
And so has Alex.
Despite this dude's constant doomsday shit failing to come true, Alex still considers him a worthwhile source, which is not surprising at all because Alex has no standards.
So...
This story here out of Michael Snyder's website has the headline, quote, A high-level exercise conducted three months ago showed that a coronavirus pandemic could kill 65 million people.
Before I get into what's actually discussed in the article, it's important to point out that the article also contains this paragraph.
Quote, I find it quite interesting that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was involved because they're also financial backers of the institute that was granted a U.S. patent for an attenuated coronavirus in November 2018.
This article is using the hoax story about the Peerbright Institute in terms of building up their article, which is indicative of a lack of quality in the work here.
It's really just indicative of an operation devoid of standards just trying to push some propaganda and cause panic.
It took place on October 18th and simulated a coronavirus outbreak.
And it was meant to explore various responses.
Alex said that their simulation involved a virus starting in China.
But, according to Michael Snyder, who is absolutely his source, the virus in the simulation started in Brazil.
This is trademark Alex.
He can't stop himself from lying.
He can't stop himself from massaging details to make things fit his narratives more closely.
It's not enough that this drill just happened and simulated a coronavirus outbreak.
It has to have started in the same place as the coronavirus originated in the real world.
If the simulation matches the real world, it strengthens the perception that the simulation was the plan for the real world, which is why he lies like this.
So, honestly, beyond that, I don't think there's anything suspicious about this event 201.
It was a get-together of people with different expertises, which was hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.
These experts basically had a symposium where they discussed their reactions to hypothetical pandemic event.
That they had set up.
They represented people from business fields, governmental organizations, and NGOs, the latter of which is why there was a representative from the Bill and Melinda Gates organization who was involved.
You can go to the website for the Center for Health Safety and watch the entire thing.
I watched most of it last night.
It's really just people talking about the implications of a developing emergency and how they feel to be inclined to respond.
I watched a bunch of it, and I gotta say, I like this stuff.
If you take away the fact that there is a real-world health crisis going on right now, this would be fun.
A lot of these people are not really into roleplaying or anything, so you can see the clear discomfort in them trying to pretend the situation is real.
And then the expert will still respond, in a situation like this, we would.
It's like, no, no, you're supposed to be in it.
Anyway, if you go to their YouTube page, you can find videos of their past exercises like this.
Like in May 2018, when they did this exact same exercise with a slightly different hypothetical disease.
You can also find plenty of other videos of conferences where these sorts of issues are discussed in a slightly different presentation, just like speakers giving lectures.
A lot of it comes down to discussing questions that may not come up in your normal thought process, but would if you're role-playing an outbreak with a bunch of experts from different fields.
Like, you bounce things off, like, oh, I hadn't considered what the business response, like, your field has thoughts and concerns that mine doesn't.
We can better help a coordinated approach if we get together and pretend.
In the past 18 years, there have been two major outbreaks of coronaviruses, with SARS in 2002 and MERS in 2012.
The host of the event, when she's giving a speech setting everything up, even points out that they wanted to create a scenario for the experts to discuss that was realistic.
And if that's your goal, a coronavirus is a great candidate to base your hypothetical disease on.
And honestly, from the perspective of the conspiracy theorist, that detail doesn't even really matter.
The fact that it's coronavirus.
If they'd used Ebola as their hypothetical disease, Alex and his ilk would just be advancing the same narratives about them having a planned meeting for a pandemic.
It probably sounds like I'm doing a bit of hand-waving here.
Like, who cares?
But honestly, this doesn't rise anywhere close to being above the level of coincidence for me.
This is a public health organization that was holding a panel discussion that centered around a hypothetical pandemic.
That's what they do.
The hypothetical pandemic they chose is a coronavirus, which makes sense as a candidate for them to use.
According to discussion in their exercise, the World Health Organization deals with approximately 200 outbreaks every year, many of them small and localized to the point where we never even hear about them.
They're able to do that work effectively and save people's lives because they train.
Because they do things like this exercise to test their preparedness for larger, more dangerous situations.
All that is just...
I mean, I know this sounds like, I don't know, a cop-out, but this is just timing.
So the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation didn't say that their planning was to bring in world government.
The conclusion of the exercise wasn't even that there should be world government.
Fuck, that Kellen McBreen article Alex is reading doesn't even say that.
The conclusions reached by the exercise were largely around government and international business, recognizing the need to work together to avert crises.
I know Alex thinks that any kind of international collaboration that doesn't involve Trump doing something weird counts as world government, but this is just weak shit.
Oh, also...
One of the goals they recognize as being important in the exercise is, quote, governments and private sectors should assign a greater priority to developing methods to combat mis- and disinformation prior to the next pandemic response.
I spent a lot of time with that pile of shit film, and I can tell you conclusively that not only did Alex not prove a damn thing in that movie, but also the bioweapons were almost not mentioned at all.
There is a lot of talk about depopulation.
That was mostly in the context of him misusing quotes from people like Bertrand Russell and Margaret Sanger to attack vaccines and abortion rights.
He did talk about race-specific bioweapons very briefly, citing the Project for a New American Century document as proof that Cheney wanted to use them.
Far be it for me to defend Dick Cheney, but that PNAC document mentions the use of bioweapons of that variety as one in a list of hypothetical threats the country could face as a justification for rebuilding America's defenses, which coincidentally is the actual name of that document.
Beyond that, the documentary, in heavy quotes, is a bunch of bullshit.
It's just fake quotes and a lot of people yelling about a road.
It's a horribly shitty documentary, and it honestly is embarrassing to look back at.
The idea that Alex is sitting here and pretending that it's somehow demonstrated or proved that the globalists are going to use a bioweapon to bring in a one-world government is just sad.
It's just sad.
And I was wondering why is he getting reminiscent about this, because it doesn't really make sense.
My favorite part of his bibliography was in the section where he was providing a citation for his claim that the Rothschilds funded both sides of all major wars.
It just said, insert Rothschild funding both sides of wars.
Alex is in a situation where you have this coronavirus outbreak.
He's been building up the narrative of using this chicken vaccine patent and then now this Center for Health Safety exercise as being all evidence that this is a globalist Like, great, you're good to go.
It was in the Wall Street Journal, though, so at least it's a real thing.
Alex is a little off on the details, though.
He says that the films are taken off Amazon Prime for violating community standards, but that's not what the article says.
It says he violated, quote, company policy.
And it goes on to say, quote, the company, Amazon, their content policy focuses on issues pertaining to sexually explicit content, violence, and copyright infringement.
But it gives Amazon leeway to disallow anything it deems inappropriate.
Prime is Amazon's streaming service, and apparently their rules are that you can upload your own stuff if you want to, but they also can take down anything they want to.
Seems like this went exactly as it should have.
Alex slid under the radar for a while and made some revenue from Amazon.
Then Avengers Endgame came out and a bunch of people accidentally watched his documentary, got confused and complained, at which point Amazon took his shit down, probably because they didn't realize it was there to begin with.
Also, Alex seems to forget how bad Endgame was.
Or what it's even about.
When he's saying that the film is just the globalist's own words, I can think of at least two completely fabricated quotes that he used in that film.
And tons of times he used quotes completely out of context, making them mean different things than what they actually meant.
Anyway, this is why Alex is talking about Endgame.
It's because they just took it off Amazon Prime, and he's really pissed off about it, and he can use it to weave into, like, his narrative that, like...
Yeah, they're taking it down because they're doing this bioweapon release.
So see, you make a film, it inspires a movie by the same name, and it inspires Dave Mustaine albums and everything else, and then it gets taken down for a thought crime.
And we've been having experts on, like Mike Adams and many others, and playing in historical clips of the co-inventor of the polio vaccine, admitting that they knew it had SV40 in it that causes cancer.
Second, when Alex says that they put SV40 in polio vaccines, he's lying.
Between 1955 and 1963, approximately 10-30% of polio vaccines were contaminated with what's known as SV40, or simian virus 40. The reason for this was that at the time, vaccines were made using monkey kidney cell cultures, and unbeknownst to the vaccine makers, some of the vaccines were contaminated.
Obviously, that's not good.
However, according to the CDC, quote, there has been some concern that the virus could cause cancer in humans.
However, most studies looking at the relationship between SV40 and cancers are reassuring, finding no causal association between the receipt of SV40 contaminated polio vaccine and the development of cancer.
Animal tests have shown that it can cause tumors and hamsters, but the tests for people have been inconclusive.
So Alex can't even prove that basic piece of his argument, which is what he's getting at.
They gave it to give everyone cancer.
In the history of medicine, it's one where you can find a ton of whoops moments.
And if you don't really want to concern yourself with details, and you just want to attack the medical field, maybe because you make all your money selling dumb supplements, it's really easy to pretend that all of these moments were actually secret attacks on the public.
According to a paper in the Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine from December 2006, an estimated 15% of all human cancers worldwide may be attributed to viruses.
A 2016 release from the National Toxicology Program from the National Institutes of Health puts the number lower, saying, quote, about 12% of cancers worldwide are linked to viruses.
A 2013 article from the American Society for Microbiology carried the headline, quote, percentage of cancers linked to viruses potentially overestimated.
This was specifically about some research from 2011 out of the Karolinska Institute in Sweden that theorized that 40% of cancer is linked to viruses, at which point scientists began to test that theory and found it was not good, and that the number was much lower, closer to 10%, which is right in line with that 12, even the 15 is in the ballpark of what...
Owen's court hearing is in about 20 minutes if it's on time in D.C. So I would guess the next hour we'll have Norm Pattis, my lawyer that's there with him, and Owen on the broadcast arrested for wearing tape across his mouth inside the Senate foyer.
Everybody else was allowed to hold up signs and do stuff and yell and scream, but he can't because, well, they ordered the police to arrest him and they follow orders.
At one point, a cop goes to put him in cuffs, and the cop Owen's been talking to says, no, he gets a warning, to which Owen replies, quote, no, arrest me in front of all these people so they can see censorship in this country.
The whole game here is that the pro-impeachment protesters didn't get arrested, but Owen did.
The goal is to reinforce the right-wing victimhood narrative that drives this entire worldview.
Crucial to this game is to never recognize what you were actually doing, why it's wrong, and what you got arrested for, which was the advertising.
Back in March of last year, someone who works with the artist Robin Bell was arrested for a similar thing.
When they projected the words, discrimination is wrong, on the Capitol building.
The issue there, I think, it may have been that the projection also included a hashtag, which could be deemed advertising.
Speaking to WAMU, Bell even said, quote, the main thing is as long as it's not an advertisement, we were pretty much told that it looked like we were able to do this.
So even there, clear that you can't advertise in the Capitol.
It's really hard to say whether Owen and Infowars knew that they were advertising in the Capitol building and that they would be arrested and that they could make it look like they were being oppressed, or if they're just too dumb to even check out relevant laws before doing their dumb shit.
Alex keeps talking about how the people who made the polio vaccine knew that there was SV40 in it, and they didn't care.
They wanted to give people cancer.
A number of times he says that this guy who worked with Jonas Salk had said as much, kind of implying that he had the guy on the show, which just isn't possible.
In that clip, it became clear that he's talking about how he played a clip of something out of context where someone talks about the SV40 virus being in the polio vaccine.
I found the full 10-minute piece that this came from, which apparently originated years ago on Mike Adams' website, and you can tell from the context that it's a doctor discussing the discovery of SV40.
Which, when presented in a certain way, makes it look a little bit more nefarious than it actually is.
This is a clip of Dr. Maurice Hilleman, who is one of the leading virologists in U.S. history.
Like, he invented so much shit.
The interview that Alex plays out of context is Hilleman discussing how he discovered SV40.
Not that he discovered it in the vaccine.
He literally discovered it when he found that some polio vaccine was contaminated with it in 1960.
It was previously unknown.
Jonas Salk developed the first polio vaccine but he had a bit of a rival in the field.
Yeah, yeah, You had people in iron lungs.
The public was really not into dealing with this crisis any longer.
And ultimately, Salk's strategy won the day and he was successful in making the polio vaccine.
Later, Albert Sabin would produce his own oral vaccine for polio that proved to be very effective.
His vaccine was being tested between 1955 and 1961, during which time Hilleman identified the SV40 virus.
And theorized that it could have a negative effect on people, and ultimately found it in the vaccines, because they were using monkey kidney cells.
The clip Alex plays of Hilleman includes him talking about how he and Sabin joked about how the Russians would have a worse shot at the Olympics due to having a bunch of tumors.
But since that was where the primary testing of Sabin's vaccine was being done, was in Russia.
I kind of would chalk this up to dark humor on the part of Hilleman, and I think it's pretty clear from the context.
More to the point, Also, because subsequent tests have shown that there isn't a strong causal connection that can be drawn between SV40 and human cancer, they're obviously, they don't know that it does.
He's talking about stuff that happened in the late 50s, these conversations that they were joking around about.
They didn't know.
So to assume that he knew that this was going to cause cancer is absolutely...
So the idea is this guy discovers a virus that has heretofore been unknown in the vaccine, did not know what its results or effects would be, simply cataloged it, and then as a bit of dark humor that I imagine a virologist would have to entertain if you're dealing with potential millions of lives being in your hands kind of thing, then he just goes...
I hope the Russians don't get cancer, essentially.
And more to the point, what Alex is describing is not accurate, even to that edited piece he played on his show.
The joke is about the Russians not doing well in the Olympics.
Not that there are too many Russians.
No one says, but we killed Americans too.
And Hilleman doesn't do that gross laugh that Alex is claiming.
Like, he's just creating a supervillain out of this that isn't even fair to the fake source.
Not fake source material, but devoid of context source material.
Also, Jonas Salk has nothing to do with Hilleman's comments.
This was all about Albert Sabin.
And Alex doesn't even know that.
He literally has no idea of the surrounding context of these topics he's covering, but he tries to pass himself off as an expert, and it's embarrassing.
Like, he's saying that this guy, who he can't even remember Hilleman's name, he's like, this doctor guy was talking to Jonas Salk.
It wasn't Salk.
It was Saban.
Like, you don't even know anything.
Like, why should I trust you, Alex, on the grand parts of it if you don't understand the basics?
This man is a dude named Leonard Horowitz, and he is a real career dum-dum.
Horowitz is a dude I've started building episodes about and repeatedly lost interest in the middle a couple times.
It's something that I've been meaning to do and I don't give a shit.
He's been on Project Cam a lot, he's been on Alex's show, and he has a real lunatic pedigree.
But he's also pretty boring.
His big claim to fame is his theory that the Rockefellers forced musical artists to use the 440 hertz frequency to make music, which makes people depressed and spreads evil.
Horowitz promotes 528Hz music, which is healing and is linked to the divine creation.
Horowitz claims that John Lennon started to make music using the 528 hertz model, and so the New World Order had him murdered since it would be too powerful and it would ruin their plans.
Because I'm not sure if we're ever going to actually do an episode about him, I should tell you that in preparation for doing an episode, I decided to only listen to him.
So anyway, that's the guy who edited together this sloppy piece about Dr. Hilleman, devoid of all this context, that was funneled through Natural News and Mike Adams, and now Alex is further embellishing and lying about in order to perpetuate the idea.
They knew there was SV40.
Not so much even that they knew, but they put it in there in order to give people cancer, which just isn't true.
The reason he's in a bad mood is that there are people on Facebook, people on other platforms that are taking misinformation surrounding this coronavirus outbreak pretty seriously.
And so he's getting some pushback and might have people...
Writing letters to the people who host his servers.
So he might be in a bit of, like, a pickle about the fact that he's putting out, and has, as a career, put out dangerous misinformation about health issues.
Yeah, and of course, because it's finally catching up and people are taking what you do seriously, it would tend to feel like, well, this is the big one.
Personally, I've been studying this situation, so I've got a lot for you here.
Let me just get right into it.
Number one, realize that the globalists, They know that the most likely fatalities in their simulations of 65 million people dead will be liberals in cities.
So the globalists are willing to massacre their own leftists, which, by the way, is consistent with that Project Veritas video documenting that Bernie Sanders supporters who said they want to mass-execute liberals.
So understand that any time you release a bioweapon, an engineered virus like this, it's going to impact the cities.
This probably doesn't come up enough, but this clip is a nice reminder of how the word globalist doesn't mean anything.
Or more accurately, it just means people we don't like.
Mike Adams is saying that the globalists released this coronavirus as a bioweapon, which is not something he can in any way prove.
And the result is going to be that a ton of liberals in cities are going to die.
Thus, the globalists are willing to kill their own people.
So liberals in cities are the globalists' own people, then.
I thought that the globalists were an evil cabal that were like multinational business heads bent on world government.
I thought they were the CFR and the Trilateral Commission, not a pro-choice activist in Portland.
You have to understand how this sleight-of-hand trick works.
You start by doing some over-the-top demonization of your shadowy, vague bad guy, and then once that's in place, you can apply that demonization however you want.
Whereas Alex used to pretend that he was above the left-right paradigm, you can pretty clearly see now that that mask has dropped.
And it's clear that the Infowars line is that liberal and urban living equals globalist.
There's not a distinction anymore.
It's just a pejorative term that could be applied to anyone they disagree with as a way of attaching them to the big bad guy demon that they've built up for years.
So Mike Adams has some more dumb things to say, but before he gets down to business, because Alex, what he ends up doing is just like, Mike, take over the show.
I have been the subject of deep state attacks that are next level.
And I was asked by the FBI.
And folks with the Central Intelligence Agency, at this point, to not get into this on air.
There's different factions in both groups, obviously.
You heard John Harmon earlier talk about years ago, the head of the Kissinger group, on the phone with me during break saying, join us, world government's good, you're going to be part of the elite, you're already the elite of this.
And then, you know, the Pentagon people doing it over the phone.
I mean, that's just what he's heard on the phone, okay?
On the phone.
You ought to see it behind the scenes.
They basically told me, you stop now or you're dead.
Sure.
And this isn't just like a death threat over the telephone.
It's like, listen, you need to do this.
It's the best thing for your family.
This is the way it is.
Now, the only reason I bring that up is you're going to see incredible lies in the media about me in the next few days.
And it's going to be horrible.
But the good news is nobody buys it like when they planted the child porn on us.
Spock's stronger than a human, so he can handle radiation longer, but he's dead already.
And Captain Kirk's trying to go, and they go, you're not saving him, he's dead already.
And I don't say this in a victimology.
I'm proud of what we've done.
But nobody else can handle this.
We knew this was coming.
We built for it.
We've handled a bunch.
But we're dead already, okay?
You just need to understand something.
That the fact that they're doing all of this right now...
Means they're going for broke against the president and everything else, and this is for real.
So, and the coronavirus obviously is a prepared simulant for a cover for other stuff, because they always have something else that's really doing, and they got the virus.
I mean, you can see all the stuff going on, but it means we're now game time.
The second wave of the pandemic begins when the coronavirus vaccine begins being administered, and we will come to learn that that vaccine contains live virus.
There will be live virus in the coronavirus vaccine, and it will set off a firestorm of the second wave.
This has already been planned, already engineered.
Mike is just making this shit up, and what the effect of this language and this rhetoric is, is to make people less trustworthy and less willing to engage with public health.
And that will make it much more difficult for them to help and to contain and treat this emerging public health situation.
I understand that there's probably very little effect that Infowars has anymore, but worst case scenario, the only outcome of this is either neutral...
Or people get hurt.
There is no positive outcome other than Mike selling more shit, more of his supplements and stuff.
You could have a plan in place and execute it quite well, and then some random variable could make an outbreak still occur.
You can prepare and do your best to mitigate the damage done by natural phenomena, but the idea he seems to have about the level of control these groups he hates have is absurd.
Mike is also playing fast and loose with the classification of outbreaks used by the World Health Organization.
He wants the audience to think that the higher the number of the stage, the worse things are, but that's not entirely accurate.
The WHO uses a six-phase scale to describe the stage at which we currently find ourselves with a particular disease from a public health standpoint.
Phase 1 is that there's no animal-to-human transmissions.
Phase 2 is when there's a virus that's known to have affected humans circulating in animal populations.
Phase 3 is when there's small clusters of people who have been infected by animals, but human-to-human transmission is uncertain.
Things get a bit more serious in Phase 4, where sustained human-to-human transmission is taking place.
Phase 5 is when confirmed human-to-human transmission has caused the condition to reach at least two countries in one region of the globe.
Phase 6 is, quote, characterized by community-level outbreaks in at least one other country from where it originated.
The avian flu situation met the criteria of Phase 6. The World Health Organization didn't classify it that way to scare people.
It was just an accurate classification.
After this phase, you enter the post-peak period, where activity and transmissions decrease.
Though health organizations keep an eye out for second waves, once things return to normal levels, the post-pandemic period begins.
Monitoring continues and the evaluation of the response that organizations had commences.
And honestly, like from all of my understanding about Where we're at currently with this coronavirus may not reach that level.
And the reason the World Health Organization would be cautious to give the classifications are from lessons learned from past circumstances.
So I don't find anything suspicious about that.
Also, I think Mike is mixing up the bird flu and the swine flu.
In June 2009, the World Health Organization declared a public health emergency internationally about the H1N1 epidemic, and through focused efforts and use of antivirals, we reached the post-peak pandemic phase by November, so within a few months.
This was something that was right to call a pandemic at its peak, since it did kill over 14,000 people in 2009, and the transmission of the virus was fitting of Phase 6 qualifications.
Currently, the Wuhan coronavirus does not appear to meet all the criteria, though if the confirmed facts about the outbreak do end up meeting them in the future, I'm certain that the World Health Organization will classify it thusly.
More importantly, this oppositional position towards public health organizations is very stupid and very dangerous.
It's one thing to be skeptical and to recognize that no human organization is infallible, so it's best to be cautious.
It's an entirely different thing to say that whatever said organization says, the opposite is true.
Particularly when you run a business selling dumb supplements and pseudoscience.
And there's a potential for people who are entranced by these narratives, let's say, or they're beholden to them, to recognize that the people who are disseminating these narratives to them are liars.
Just to follow billions of dollars to vaccine companies.
We were told that that was huge.
We were told, I mean, do you remember a couple of years ago?
We were told that babies were going to be born with shrunken heads all across Florida and Louisiana and Mississippi, the hot, humid regions of the southeast United States.
Babies were going to be born with shrunken heads.
You remember those news stories?
That was all over the media because of the Zika virus.
And we all better run out and get Zika vaccines, and we better have emergency Zika vaccine research.
And sure enough, Congress, if I remember correctly, they approved, I think it was $2 billion for Zika virus vaccine research.
with shrunken heads in the South was that in areas where there were Zika outbreaks, particularly in Brazil, they were accompanied by highly increased rates of microcephaly.
The reason the states he lists might have been discussed is because Zika is transmitted by mosquitoes and those states have climates that are far more hospitable to mosquitoes and therefore it would be a higher risk of Yeah.
Anyway, the issue for the U.S. and Zika was that it wasn't as huge of a threat for us, but it was for people around the world.
We have the public health infrastructure to deal with it better, in so much as we have prevalent air conditioning and screened windows, which cut down drastically on the ability of mosquito-carried diseases to spread.
It was proposed that Congress allocate $1.9 billion to Zika, but they ended up actually just funding $1.1 billion.
And a lot of it was aimed at funding local and state agencies to put mosquito control initiatives into place, not all directed towards a vaccine.
And the big picture here is Zika was not a made-up virus.
This is a representation of how Mike Adams doesn't believe that people in developing countries around the world deserve health.
The concerns that people had about how Zika could possibly affect the United States did not come to pass.
But other countries absolutely suffered dire consequences from the virus.
And in that sense, the World Health Organization was absolutely correct to call it an emergency.
No, it's a weird solipsistic nationalism where it's like, if it doesn't happen, and not even that, it's like, if I don't get Zika, then they just made it up.
This is a crass and disgusting sales pitch, pure and simple.
Mike is claiming that the food is running out in Wuhan because he wants the listener to buy his and Alex's survival food buckets.
That's the game they're playing here.
I can find no evidence that there's a food crisis in Wuhan.
Obviously, there's going to be some sentiment of concern from people under a quarantine about food, but all the articles I can find about this are about how the government understands that this is an issue and are stepping up their deliveries of food to the city.
According to the South China Morning Post, shipments of various food items were coming in from neighboring provinces regularly, and that there is a stockpile of 11 million pounds of rice and 10,000 tons of pork and beef at the ready.
In addition to the regular deliveries of food.
The same article discusses how some residents are stockpiling food, and that does make some sense as a human behavior.
But it also doesn't demonstrate that there's a food crisis, just that people behave that way sometimes.
This is sensationalism aimed at Mike's domestic audience.
He doesn't care at all what people around the world are going through.
I mean, it's clear from his talk about Zika.
He knows that this is an opportunity to heighten his doomsday narratives to sell these food buckets.
That is literally the underlying theme of his sensationalism.
It's that kind of person that is so stupid and so incompetent that they assume that everybody else is more stupid and more incompetent in order to make themselves feel smarter.
So that idea of like...
We're all going to starve to death!
It's like nobody could possibly think ahead for this type of shit.
Nobody but me could ever realize that in this circumstance there might be food worries.
So obviously all of these people have no idea what they're doing and we're all going to die.
Right.
No, I mean people, look, it sucks, but people know.
If you sprayed surfaces with bleach, like a bleach-water mixture, and put it in a spray bottle, you could spray down the surfaces, and it killed Ebola virus.
And then what happened back then?
Well, the media and the government, they said that, oh, don't talk about natural cures for Ebola.
I think Mike Adams is trying to pretend that he didn't post an Ebola cure on his website, Natural News, that involved putting a sample of live Ebola and some booze into a bottle and mixing it up real good.
Whenever he's losing his mind, he just grabs some oven cleaner while he's sick, and he's like, if you can clean an oven, you can clean me, and he drinks it.
But I think he does recognize that the climate that we're living in now with people taking propaganda and these bad actors more seriously, it's going to lead to some backlash.
When this pandemic gets large in the United States, there will be takedown orders and censorship orders to take offline and ban any account of anybody who talks about a natural cure for coronavirus.
Why is that?
Why will that be happening?
Because they can't have people curing themselves.
They can't allow people to survive the onslaught.
They, the globalists who engineered this, who funded it, who ran the laboratories, they want to kill as many people as possible.
And you posted a fucking Ebola cure on your website.
So get the fuck out of here.
Like, it's an issue of you're going to get people killed if you behave in the ways that, like, let's say you did surrounding the Ebola.
Like, let's say there is a possibility that someone could have gotten their hands on some live Ebola to prepare the cure that Mike posted on his website.
I understand there's issues with free speech and what have you, but I also recognize that people who are acting in ways that are specifically going to further a public health crisis I might be fine with, let's say, Facebook deciding we don't want this on the platform.
They don't want people healing themselves naturally.
Like, whenever I say that the cure for this coronavirus is finding an airborne sample of smallpox and injecting it directly into your bloodstream and then spitting and sneezing on everyone around you.
The government doing it, I think, opens up another box.
I have no evidence that the government is doing it, so I don't even care to have that conversation.
It would be a little bit different, but if these platforms are just like, go fuck yourself, you're putting people at risk, then I think they're well within their right to do that, and I support their decision.
So, anyway, this isn't all just about killing people with this coronavirus.
Well, we know that part of the agenda here is indoctrination training and also quarantine training.
So whether or not this is the big kill virus or some other future virus is still unknown.
The death rate, fatality rate from this virus is not yet high enough to kill a billion people, but it could kill tens of millions as projected in the software.
But it will most certainly provide the precedent for a total police state lockdown of the United States and every major city in America.
Like, say whatever you want about how China's responded to the outbreak.
It's kind of irrelevant to the point Mike is making here.
You could say that their lockdown of Wuhan is shocking and a police state, and I'm not going to argue with you.
It's also China.
Mike is making the argument that the U.S. will use this outbreak to set the stage to enact martial law, but this raises the question, why didn't they do this after other outbreaks?
In the mid-1980s, there was a giant measles outbreak.
That didn't lead to martial law.
Instead, it led to greater public health practices.
The polio crisis of the early 1900s didn't lead to martial law.
Diphtheria killed around 15,000 people in the U.S. between 1921 and 1925, and that didn't lead to martial law.
Some estimates claimed that as many as 57 million Americans caught swine flu in 2009, and that didn't lead to martial law.
There were over 5,000 confirmed U.S. cases of Zika in 2016, and that didn't lead to martial law.
The public health systems that we have in place are very competent and due to exercise, like the one carried out by the Center of Health Safety at Johns Hopkins.
They consider complicated response variables to better enable them to react to changing situations fluidly.
The editorial position of InfoWars is that everything is a conspiracy, and the ultimate end goal of everything is to get to martial law.
Because that has to be the end point of their theories, they often have to say completely stupid shit like this in order to work in that direction.
Honestly, the only thing that makes me at all worried that there could be some elements of martial law pop up in response to this outbreak is that Trump is president, and they fully support Trump.
He's the sort of president who doesn't trust science or experts, so it would be easy to imagine him overreacting and quarantining a U.S. city.
But to be totally clear, I do not even think that that is a likely series of events.
He said that the software projections say that this could kill tens of millions.
He's referring to the Center for Health Safety exercise, which was not simulating the situation that's currently unfolding.
It was just using a hypothetical coronavirus outbreak as the context for the discussion.
The actual variables are very different, from the specific characteristics of the virus to the context of its origin, that it's wildly irresponsible to pretend that the simulation has any predictive value in the real-world situation.
Mike is pretending that this is the case because he wants the audience to believe that the simulation was exactly like this actual situation because the globalists planned it all out.
The minute, just like a soldier or an officer gives an order to kill men, women, and children, the soldiers turn their guns.
The default by the human resistance, because the computers didn't get put...
What I'm saying, folks, is the biggest secret ever.
Now the military human element realizes they're being replaced and the default without any orders coming down is they're going to kill all the globalists the minute they kick this off.
And that's not a bluff or a threat.
I mean, we're going to have 90% decapitation within days of them pulling this off, Mike.
On one level, Alex is a child living in a bizarre fantasy world full of espionage and ins and outs.
And to that extent, this is the sort of rhetoric you should just ignore and move along.
More than anything else, it's just another example of his big boy violence fantasies.
However, there's a real danger to this kind of thing, particularly in times of elevated anxieties, like you might find at the beginning of uncertain stages of a virus outbreak.
The coronavirus is not a bioweapon being deployed by the globalists.
However, there is a possibility that things will get worse before they get better.
As tensions rise and Alex and Mike whip the audience into a frenzy saying shit like it's over for humanity, the odds of one of his listeners taking him seriously might rise.
The definition of who is a globalist is completely arbitrary at this point, but you have the major figures Alex yells about all the time, ranging from the Clintons to Soros to Brian Stelter.
As the natural progression of the coronavirus plays out, Alex runs a very serious risk of his rhetoric being understood by the more unhinged in his audience to go ahead and kill people he's labeled as the enemies of humanity.
Alex has set a condition for when these people are to be killed, which is super vague.
He says when they try to kick this off.
But what the fuck does that mean?
There are already tons of cases of coronavirus in a number of countries, and Alex has literally said earlier in this same episode that the ball had been kicked off.
So that seems to imply that the time has already come.
This game Alex is playing is profoundly dangerous.
It very well may be that his audience is too small and disengaged at this point, where there isn't anyone listening who will take him up on what he's advocating.
But to me, that's a secondary point.
He's more or less riling up his audience to kill his imagined enemies.
The way I hear this is just Alex being clear that he's on his last legs.
He isn't bringing in any money.
Anyone who's getting radicalized into conspiracy theory shit, there's way too many free options of the same kind of content he's providing.
So there's no real prospect of him growing in the future.
He's hitched his wagon to a president who's impeached and who just loosened restrictions on the chemical Alex has been yelling about for a decade.
So that's kind of embarrassing.
His once remarkable conspiracy kingdom is dust.
And his anger and resentment about it is being expressed by a sharp increase in the violent rhetoric towards his imagined enemies and blunt conversations about their murder, which is not surprising.
I think people should be...
I think it's worth taking at least a little seriously.
Yeah, you know, it is kind of dangerous when people who've spent their entire lives propagandizing projections of basically themselves onto imaginary figures, when they start...
Projecting the end of the world because their own careers aren't going so well.
We know that there's some knowledge of us, but the only thing that I want to come of that is just for John Rappaport to finally hang up that fucking picture.
He starts rambling a bit, and this leads into a conversation about how the globalists, what they do is they trick you into thinking that all good is evil and all evil is good.
Like, rap ports out here trying to blow people's minds, saying the globalists tell you everything good is bad and everything bad is good to invert things.
So it's kind of like if you spent all of your time screaming about this chemical and how it's going to destroy you, and the government then says, no, actually it's good for more of it.
like wait that's bullshit too so it's okay so you're telling me that there's been a massive conspiracy that has lied to me my entire life and everything that I believe is actually the inverse and you are telling me this why would I believe you it's a means by which like you can maybe create an opening that you can get people in sure But it's not accurate.
But you've got to do it immediately.
Why would I believe you?
Because I have your best interests.
Well, they say that they have my best interests.
Yeah, but you can believe me because you have to cut in there.
Incidentally, Jordan, I should tell you that the flu of 1957 that he's talking about, the Asian flu, had killed between one and two million people worldwide.
It was a very serious situation.
By the summer of 1957, it had reached the United States, and in March 1958, an estimated 69,800 people had been killed by it in America.
Rappaport decided not to get a vaccine, and he got lucky that he didn't catch that flu, but his experience holds exactly zero importance in terms of science.
This is his backstory that he's presenting when he's called a leader in the field of denying vaccines.
He was a dumb-dumb in college who didn't want to get a vaccine.
He didn't catch the flu, and other people did.
That's not how science works.
That's a really bad style of thinking to hear from someone pretending to be involved in the field of science.
This is how a dumb, dumb undergraduate who thinks they're already a genius thinks, not somebody who studied the actual subjects.
All of these guys, Alex, Rappaport, Mike Adams, you scratch beneath the surface on them just a little bit.
Isn't that the fundamental misunderstanding they have of science?
And they're like, no, science is all about skepticism and all that stuff.
And it's like, yeah, but it's not about skepticism because you know a guy who one thing happened to one time or because you personally didn't get a vaccine one time and you turned out fine.
You look at these guys on the screen, and they're superheroes throwing hammers all over the place, and then you talk to Chris Hemsworth in real life, and he doesn't want to say shit about...
It shows you your soul and says, I will give you your soul if you follow me.
When that great vision it's giving you is the potential you already have that if you give it to Satan, you lose.
You're already made in the image of God.
You're already divine in God's will.
You already have all this potential.
And it's tricking you to give it power to control you because you believe.
That it's given you that vision and that power when God made you that way.
Didn't give it to you, it made you.
You're free will.
You're made.
Like, you're there.
You're a made man, you're a made woman, and they're trying to steal that power.
And that's the most frustrating thing, is watching people shine away their birthright and everything they've got to these midget gremlins that are older than us, and they're there and placing themselves in front of our vision.
So there's a trend that I see throughout a lot of John Rappaport appearances, and I've talked about this in the past, and that is that Alex often seems to have breakdowns whenever Rappaport's on.
God is free will, so how do you open yourself up to God, but not to bad stuff, and just say, because if people open yourself up to God, I can instantly just connect to it.
I'm going to be arrogant here on air and do it, but the point is, I can instantly be in that place the most high that David talks about in the Psalms.
How do people begin that journey?
I guess not going to a fake church that knows they're seeking God and sucks them in.
It's really weird because I remember that being something that I'd theorize.
There is some sort of a weird connection between these two and interviews do sometimes tend to veer towards Alex needing help and Rappaport being there to help him.
And I also think he's hypnotizing him.
But there is...
Just, it's so weird.
This episode is just so weird.
Like, there's more lies and hoaxes about the coronavirus.
You know, I normally end this with these aliases, but I feel like in honor of Alex's love, we should probably end this by saying, go fuck yourself, John.