Today, Dan and Jordan check in to see how Alex Jones is doing with the beginning of Trump's impeachment trial. In this installment, Alex gives up on covering the impeachment, attempts to launch a bird-brained conspiracy about the Coronavirus, and warns of shrinking genitals.
I think this is an interesting thing, because one of the things that is really keeping us in the present day is the fact that the Trump impeachment is beginning.
Yep.
There's these flare-ups that keep happening, like Alex declaring a civil war was going to break out on Monday.
So there's these sorts of things, but the impeachment hearing and the trial is really what, I would figure, is the most compelling, most interesting thing.
Alex should have an angle on it.
So that's what I was mostly looking for here in this episode.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I enjoy this show, I'd like to support what these gents do, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show.
If you're a dad with a huge Johnson and you look down at your son and you're like, wow, even though you're a full-grown adult and this is a weird thing to be doing, I know why.
Every reporter and the crew and the security people has just done a 100% job.
Everything fell into place.
And everything we did was wildly successful and game-changing.
And national news, taking over deep state narratives that gun owners were going to cause a giant murderous bloodbath, turned it around on them, educated the folks about how the governor was trying to cause a false flag and coming for people's guns.
Same thing happened with the Women's March, how it's run by Soros, how it's meant to divide the family.
We totally took that over and got the majority of the coverage.
But I think this offers us a really interesting window into seeing how Alex views the world.
Like, in his mind, the globalists are saying that all gun owners are evil, and what he did was hijack that narrative and show the world it isn't true.
But in reality, no one really was saying that gun owners are all evil.
They were saying that the sensational way that certain extremist gun weirdos were building up that rally in Virginia was having the effect of attracting unstable and very dangerous people, and that could be a recipe for trouble.
The thing, though, is that Alex isn't really responsible for demonstrating that the globalist positions are wrong, because he was responding to a straw man.
However, he was partially responsible for the sensational coverage of the rally and how it was going to be the site of a globalist false flag to kick off the new race slash civil war.
He was part of creating that atmosphere where extremists like the members of the base felt the rally was a prime target to create an event that would advance their accelerationist agenda.
Alex is part of the problem in the real world.
In his head, he's created an imaginary problem, which he is the solution to.
I think what's interesting about the rally is the more statistics and everything that they put up, it makes you realize that responsible gun owners are, by and large, very responsible.
What was it?
80% of gun owners supported every single one of the gun control measures passed?
And the only problem are these fucking thousand gun weirdos who are absolutely out there looking for danger.
But it's the rhetoric that surrounds it that involves like, okay, yeah, they want you to only be able to buy one gun a month unless you have the concealed carry permit because the concealed carry permit is the way they can track you to come and take your guns.
There's that insinuating voice of his again, like he did with the caller who was talking about the shooting hoax around the time of the Virginia Bills.
We're in a bit of an interesting situation currently as it relates to what's being called the Wuhan coronavirus.
This novel strain of coronavirus that's come out of China.
At the point we're recording this, a lot of the basics regarding the spread and scope of the virus are not entirely clear, but it's definitely something that merits attention and should be taken seriously.
Most of the people who've come down with the virus are believed to have caught it when they were in Wuhan, a travel hub in China.
Or it's thought that they were exposed to a fish and seafood market that might have had infected animals at it.
At this stage, it does seem like there has been some human-to-human transmission of the virus.
But passing it along still would require transmission of bodily fluids.
So according to available information, it's not like something where we need an extreme panic surrounding this.
I'd really like to say more about this, but honestly, according to the information I can find from the CDC and other official sources, we most likely won't know the extent of this outbreak for a little while, at least.
It's being said to be a serious concern among the elderly, babies, and people with compromised immune systems, but it seems like for most people, you might just end up, even if you get it, with a bad cold.
The ambiguity and the uncertainty that's surrounding the situation right now, it should lead people to approach it with some caution with their reporting, but that's not how Alex and InfoWars play it.
They come out swinging with sensationalism and fear porn, the likes of which I haven't seen since the last time Alex was yelling about Obama trying to sneak Ebola into the country.
Normal outlets like CNN are quick to point out that even though there have been deaths from this strain, that the rate is lower than SARS or MERS, two similar viruses that have come up in the recent past.
Infowars instead ran an article about how Imperial College of London professor Neil Ferguson was quoted as saying that this could have a similar death rate to the 1918 Spanish flu outbreak, and then they editorialized that could mean that 195 million people could die from this.
Okay, so you're saying that some media outlet took...
Noted experts in tire phrasing and wording and answering questions wherein basically he counseled everybody to be cautious about making this a ridiculous, sensationalized thing.
And then the media outlet grabbed the one hypothetical where he was like, well, it could be bad.
And a reality of these sorts of situations is that oftentimes what you see is it looks really bad.
And then when you find that there are, I don't know, 10,000 additional people who had the virus and didn't even know they did because they just got a cold, you realize, like, okay, it's not as deadly as it appears immediately.
That's the gist that I got from Ferguson's comments that were mysterious and conspicuous in their absence from the InfoWars article.
I can't tell you what's going to happen with this virus, but I do think it's repugnant for Alex to behave the way he is.
No matter the scale of the eventual outcome, this is a public health issue, and people should be given the information they need to best equip themselves to keep themselves and their families safe.
In a situation like this, there's no place for sensationalism, but honestly, Alex doesn't have any other guidelines All he has is insinuation.
In a position that is equally knee-jerk as it is uninformed.
That this virus is a globalist attack as opposed to just a reality of life in the modern world.
Every virus and condition is unknown until it's not.
People who work on this stuff understand that dynamic perfectly well.
But Alex, he has a piece of information that blows this whole thing wide open.
A month and four days ago, this virus was patented for a vaccine or whatever.
Which definitely proves that this is a globalist attack.
I can find no evidence of what he's saying.
This would be December 18th, 2019, that he's talking about, and there's no indication that I can find that he's not just making this up.
On December 20th, 2019, Merck announced that they'd gotten FDA approval for an Ebola vaccine called Ervebo.
This is huge news, but it has nothing to do with the Wuhan situation.
As best as I can tell, there's a conspiracy running around that there was a patent put on this virus to make a vaccine prior to the outbreak being reported to the World Health Organization.
But I've reviewed the arguments and basically it all boils down to these online dum-dums not realizing that the word coronavirus is not unique to this outbreak.
It's an umbrella under which there's tons of specific viruses, including SARS and MERS.
I can find conspiracy theorists talking about a prior coronavirus patent and how that's suspicious, but I can't find anything about December 18th and that shit that Alex is talking about.
Infowars has posted tons of articles, but I need to be very afraid, but none of them have anything about this mysterious patent.
I have searched natural news as well, and I couldn't find any information on it.
I have no idea at this point what Alex is talking about, but maybe a little bit later in the episode, Alex will reveal.
And at that point, we can figure out whether or not he's making shit up.
On the other hand, I have no idea why he's surprised by what's happening.
Alex has absolutely supported Bolsonaro up to this point, when literally everyone who knows anything has been shouting warnings about his repression of the press and his authoritarian leanings.
Alex knows nothing about the country.
He doesn't even know the dude's name.
It was never important to him.
He was just Brazil's Trump, and that was good enough.
In his campaign, Bolsonaro called the media trash.
Reporters Without Borders sounded a very serious alarm, noting that after the first round of elections, he had said he planned to, quote, put a final stop to all forms of activism in Brazil, which is the sort of thing only a dictator would probably say publicly.
He later qualified his position that the media was trash, tweeting, quote, when they cover the facts without political activism and partiality, the media fulfill a valuable role of informing people.
The rest of this is in all caps.
Quote, we are against any type of social control of the media and internet.
Reuters reported during the campaign that, quote, the Brazilian Association of Investigative Journalism has identified more than 60 instances of physical violence or its imminent threat against journalists during the campaign.
This probably explains why Bolsonaro tweeted in all caps, really trying to overstress that these attacks aren't the natural result of his rhetoric.
What we're seeing now with the targeting of Glenn Greenwald is terrible, but none of it should be surprising.
In the campaign, Brazilian journalist Miriam Lieto was aggressively targeted and threatened by Bolsonaro supporters for an article that they wrote about the threat that he posed to democracy.
Reporters Without Borders covered a female journalist who cannot be named for security reasons, who worked for any.
10 news she was hit in the chin and arm by bolsonaro supporters who threatened to rape her and said quote when the commander is president the whole press will be killed bolsonaro himself attacked and threatened to remove any government advertising from forad to sao paulo uh the newspaper accusing them of being fake news When a closer examination reveals he was probably just mad that they ran critical coverage of him and ran a story, quote, affirming that he had threatened to kill his ex-wife.
His constant and aggressive attacks on the media have created a very hostile and very non-free environment for the press and the country, and it's exactly what everyone who cares at all has been warning about since he was campaigning.
All that time, Alex is not given a single shit.
He supported Bolsonaro because nothing matters to Alex other than optics.
This guy was being called Brazil's Trump, and he was acting a lot like Trump.
He was friendly with Trump.
He used the same words like fake news.
How the fuck are you supposed to criticize him without being very clear that you're fine with the same thing from Trump?
Alex has now entered the place and the period where criticism about Trump for not freeing Julian Assange has become normalized.
So now he can feign some kind of concern about Greenwald's situation without jeopardizing losing his audience of Trump dum-dums.
This is all just very sad and a clear demonstration of how little Alex cares about any of this shit.
If he cared, he'd know Bolsonaro's name.
If he cared, he would have noticed the very clear pattern of attacking the press in Brazil for a long time already.
If he cared, he would take a look in the mirror and realize that he would absolutely lock up Brian Stelter if he had the power to do so.
What I'm getting at is that if I were Paul Joseph Watson...
I'd probably accuse Alex of virtue signaling here about caring about the press.
The guy who revealed Operation Car Wash was a giant corrupt bullshit scam.
The guy who revealed that they illegally ousted Silva in order to...
Or not Silva.
No, it was Silva.
They ousted her in order to install it to mayor, even though they...
That was illegal, and he wasn't even allowed to fucking run.
And then because Lula was in prison at the time, again, illegally, for no reason, if he's a political prisoner, he wasn't allowed to run, even though he would have won by a fucking mile.
And instead, Bolsonaro is in with a fucking absolute stranglehold on power.
I don't know why they would go after Glenn Greenwald.
What they don't want is people tuning in to see the impeachment feed on a Breitbart or an Infowars or a right side or a judicial watch.
Because see, in the modern age, everybody's figuring out, wait a minute, I can just pay a couple hundred bucks to C-SPAN?
Or to Congress, and they'll just give me the feed, and then I can carry it?
And CNN is always behind the censorship.
You know it was Oliver Darcy or one of those guys called up YouTube and said, because they've got the contacts at the top of it, and said, what are you doing letting Judicial Watch run this?
And they've had their streaming capabilities taken away by YouTube previously due to a breach of community standards.
It seems believable to me that they were in violation again here and had their streaming suspended again.
I don't care.
As for Judicial Watch, they're a ridiculous right-wing propaganda outlet who have received YouTube strikes recently for things like revealing the alleged Ukraine whistleblower's name.
It seems very believable, again, that they were not just providing some kind of commentary on the impeachment, but might have been operating a bit outside YouTube's rules.
This was specifically a YouTube thing.
Judicial Watch's stream of the impeachment continued on their own website.
It was just something about their stream was not appropriate for YouTube.
I've been doing this show long enough not to care about Judicial Watch, and I cannot possibly believe anything that Right Side Broadcasting says.
So, if you're listening and you're paying attention, what has just happened here is Alex said that, hey, this coronavirus was patented for a vaccine a month and four days ago, and then there was an outbreak.
Hey, isn't that suspicious?
I'm not saying that the globalists are doing this, but sometimes bananas are yellow, bats hang upside down, and two plus two is four.
He doesn't go that far as to imply that his products are going to help you with this situation, but there is, like, the commercial that he plays is that one about, like...
If one of them, of the group that I don't care much for, said, I'm not here to talk, and then Jordan Kleber's like, oh, I'm gonna fucking dominate this person.
Pretty sure you still have to sign releases on broadcast TV.
Apparently on InfoWars you can just be like, I'm going to bitch at this person for a while, inexplicably thinking that he's going to dominate anybody in an argument.
He couldn't dominate a nine-year-old in an argument.
unidentified
So here's the truth about Trump's impeachment.
They're claiming that Trump's impeachment is for Ukrainian quid pro quo.
The only problem is Nancy Pelosi, who advanced the articles of impeachment, to the Senate admitted that they started this inquiry before Trump was even president.
So how can they impeach Trump for something he did as president?
You know, when Infowars tells you something's bombshell news, we're not hyping it.
There's a lot of bombshells, though.
This is a war.
The future of humanity on this planet and beyond.
Infinity and beyond, as Buzz Lightyear likes to say.
But I just got a call, oh, the producer did, Daria, two minutes ago, saying Owen just got out of court.
It's bombshell news.
They're trying to put him in jail for going in there at the kickoff of impeachment and saying who needs to really be impeached is the Democrats and the deep state.
Now, we can't find cases where the Democrats, other than the fact that they got physical sometimes, sometimes they've gotten physical, they've actually been indicted.
But when the Democrats take over live events, they don't get in trouble.
They might get arrested, but they're throwing the book at Owen Troyer.
You can find tons of left-wing protesters and activists who are nonviolent who've been arrested for demonstrating and faced consequences and had to go to trial.
Alex is completely making up the idea that none are in order to exaggerate and fuel the right-wing victimhood that animates his business, turning Owen Troyer into some kind of a martyr.
Although, I do think this is really interesting because this isn't news.
On the 22nd of January, Owen Schroer disrupted that impeachment hearing in early December.
He's just had to go to a court date.
And this makes me realize why he's still in D.C. covering the impeachment.
So, Alex has been teasing this coronavirus thing, and it really was me hitting my head against a wall, trying to figure out what the fuck is he talking about.
I have no idea.
This is really absurd.
Then finally, here, at this point, Alex uses a specific.
There is a Pibrite Institute, if I'm pronouncing that right, that's a shadowy, you know, secretive group like a lot of these big foundations and where they get their money.
I guess a lot of it's probably Bill and Melinda Gates.
But they've been working on trying to create a vaccine for this.
People are working on it, but it probably won't be ready for a while.
I have literally never heard Alex bring up the Hybrite Institute on his show before, and he's obviously unfamiliar with them, being as he isn't sure how to pronounce their name.
But now, here he is, reporting on them as a shadowy organization that's up to no good.
He's making insinuations about them as if they're a long-time bad guy on the show, but this is all new shit.
Also, point of order, he's completely making up that they're funded by Bill Gates.
It's entirely possible that some funding for that foundation does exist from Bill Gates, but Alex is absolutely just guessing and making that up.
He has no reason to suggest that, other than to make the Hybrite Institute look evil by connecting them to an established bad guy in his cinematic universe.
Now that I have some information, I can get to the bottom of this.
And if this clip's pathetic rambling didn't already tell you this, this is complete bullshit.
There is no article on InfoWars.
Nor News Wars, nor Summit News, nor Natural News that include the words Hybrite Institute.
Alex appears to be getting this information about the Pyrebrite Institute and how they got a vaccine patented in December from Jordan Sather, noted QAnon weirdo on Twitter, and a guy who recommends people drink bleach for healthcare.
From the patent, quote, A serotype that is not related to the vaccine used, posing a risk to the poultry industry.
Further, there's a need in the industry to develop vaccines which are suitable for use in OVO in order to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of vaccine programs.
This is the problem with people not reading things.
If you read over this patent, you'll find a dead giveaway when they're talking about clinical indications from the vaccine, and the main side effect they're talking about and they're concerned with is snicking, which is a respiratory condition in chickens.
There's no conversation in this patent at all about human use because it's a vaccine for fucking chickens.
And I need to stress that this story Alex is talking about is complete bullshit.
But the sliver of sort of reality is that the Pure Bright Institute does study animal diseases that have a potential to possibly spread to humans.
Like in the case of the coronavirus in chickens.
But that's not all that they do.
They're primarily an animal health organization, as one might learn from looking into some of their other research, like their recent breakthrough related to foot and mouth disease, which only affects hooved animals, which humans are not.
Jordan Sather tweeted out a fucking patent for a chicken vaccine they're presenting as being the same thing as this Wuhan coronavirus outbreak and now it's proof that the globalists are attacking everybody.
It's blind trust in people like Alex and Jordan Sather.
Those types of people who don't do any work just throw spaghetti against the wall for sensational effect.
People just need to not trust them and go and read these things.
The people who are tricked by a lot of this stuff, they know how to read.
They just don't do it and don't confirm these things.
Like with Alex, if any of his listeners went and actually read the Texas Domestic Terrorism Threat Assessment, it would puncture the entire world that he's creating.
What he's saying is that the Pierbright Institute patented a vaccine for the coronavirus that is now being treated in Wuhan as a possible issue, but it's for chickens.
And that's why they want us off the air, because Right Side Broadcasting and Judicial Watch are carrying feeds that they paid for off the government and C-SPAN feeds.
You can buy it from the government or C-SPAN.
They're in a partnership with Congress.
It's very inexpensive.
A couple hundred bucks last time we did it to pay for a feed.
Now we just have the satellite feeds here and subscribe to them.
Jack Dorsey, Oliver Darcy, Oliver Darcy calls up and says, that's his job.
You've got an extremist.
Oh, YouTube blocked it.
That's in the news right here.
So that's the level.
They don't want us on air.
They don't want us being able to cover any of this.
They are the masters.
They are the controllers.
They're the ones that are going to suppress the American people, but they're not.
So now it's become, Alex is implying that it's in the news that Oliver Darcy and CNN were behind getting right-side broadcasting and judicial watches streams on YouTube taken down.
He has nothing to base that on.
He just made it up earlier in the show, and now he's repeating it as if it's fact.
He injected one little bit of citizen truth into it, and he's been arrested, and he's now been in court.
He's going to pay for a lawyer for committing a thought crime.
The Democrats come in and take over those events with Code Pink all the time.
They don't get charged.
Again, it's unequal weights and measures.
It's selective enforcement, and they're trying to...
Push Owen.
They're trying to bamboozle him.
They're trying to Shanghai him.
They're trying to Buffalo him.
And yes, Owen's been sued by the deep state.
I've been sued by the deep state.
InfoWars is fighting all of that, and that's why when you buy the coffee, and that's why when you buy your good fish oil from us, you buy your good troubics from us, an X2 that just came back in.
You see the transmutation here of the victimhood, the exaggeration, the lies about, like, there's a complete selective enforcement.
These Democrats who disrupt don't ever have to deal with any consequences, but people like me and Owen, who are up against the deep state and so brave to do this fight, we are attacked.
And please, by the way, Buy my coffee.
It's how the victimhood gets translated to a call to action for sales.
The left never gets any consequences for that, except for the government trying to put you in jail for the rest of your life for keeping people from dying.
And so they talk about this a little bit, and Alex gets a little weird.
unidentified
They pay protesters to come out here that have no idea what the impeachment is even about, but oh my gosh.
If you're one lowly peon, if you're one tiny little ant, one little citizen that dares stand up for your rights, that dares stand up to the hated Trump...
You know, this happens here on air and in the interest of total transparency.
I was already going to play this later in the fourth hour.
I'm going to play it now because it's so important.
And we've got so many incredible clips.
From what happened in Virginia, that during a short break, trying to decide again which ones we're going to play, because they're all so powerful, and then other people come in the room and ask questions.
It's not a problem.
We're just an open newsroom in here.
We're too few people doing too much.
I'm not complaining.
Then I get angry.
And I've learned, instead of getting angry, just say, hey, I'm going to pick what I think is one of the most important reports, and just play almost the whole thing.
And it seems to me that there's a possibility that when Alex gets really mad, the only way he can really allow it to get out is to yell about Islam and to complain.
So he starts doing that a little bit here in this next clip.
French government admits there are hundreds and hundreds of no-go zones in which French cannot go.
You can be black, you can be white, you can be old, you can be young.
a Muslim you're gonna get your ass attacked and if you're an American rapper and you fight back in France or Sweden they're gonna lock your ass up till President Trump gets you out of jail Imagine a bunch of big black dudes are walking down the street and a bunch of little Islamics come up and literally start attacking them.
Black guys fight back, they're Americans, and they go to jail.
That's how Europe has rolled out the red carpet of the Islamics, and I have a big stack of news on that front.
Generally speaking, I try not to pay too much attention to things like celebrities getting into fights, particularly when there's some ambiguity to it.
I don't care about celebrities, and I'm not impressed by fights, so it's just not really my thing.
With the A $AP Rocky situation, I have no idea what happened, but it's literally nothing like what Alex is describing.
There's a video of the fight, and it's not a bunch of black guys walking down the street only to be attacked by little Islamics, as Alex puts it.
This is gaslighting, because whatever the reality of what started that fight is, documented reality is not what Alex is describing.
The 19-year-old who ended up getting beaten up didn't get charged by the Swedish government because it was determined in court that he only acted in self-defense.
Also, even if Trump did push to get Rocky out of prison, it's hilarious how stupid his attempts were.
To quote an article in Reuters about it, quote, That's an issue.
Ultimately, Trump didn't get Aesop Rocky released.
On August 14th, 2019, he had an appearance before the Stockholm District Court where he was found guilty, but the court decided not to give him a sentence, deeming time served to be sufficient, as well as an order to pay for his victim's medical costs.
Trump really didn't do shit in that case, other than act publicly pretty embarrassingly.
I don't think that Alex is right to claim that the French government is admitting that there are no-go zones, hundreds and hundreds of them, but I think I understand where this story is coming from.
He's reporting on a Breitbart story that uses a story in a French paper, Le Journal du Dimanche, as its source.
There's a little bit of a slippery translation here, I think, where the story is saying that a classified document allegedly says that 150 districts in France are held by Islamists.
This document is referenced, but the article in the Journal de Dimanche also says that a quote has not been disclosed.
So it's not clear even what this document says.
But the article does go on to discuss polling numbers in Mauberge.
Where the Union of French Muslim Democrats got a 40% approval in a poll.
So it seems to me like there's a decent chance that what this is about is that there's a Muslim political party that's popular in communities where there are more Muslims.
And this is being translated and reported as no-go zones.
I think that there's a possibility that that's what this is about.
So I looked into the Union of French Muslim Democrats a little bit.
It seems like Alex and his ilk should really be in favor of them.
Also, to be clear, just so you know, off the top, like that party has fielded candidates for office that are not Muslims.
It's not a uniquely strictly Muslim party.
Right.
an article in Deutsch Well from 2015.
The UFMD is an attempt to combat Islamophobia by encouraging young Muslims to get engaged with the political process.
The article spoke to a 28-year-old woman who's involved in the party who stressed that getting involved in this sort of activity is an important part of, quote, showing that we are not like them, referencing ISIS.
In the article, a sociologist named Pietra reflects on the party and notes that there's little chance of them making real strides in regional elections.
But, quote, the fact they embrace their attachment to secularism and the French Republic can help in de-demonizing Muslims.
As their people appear in the media and get better known, they'll be seen in a different way.
I don't know how much this article proves that the government is admitting that there's hundreds and hundreds of no-go zones, but it definitely doesn't appear that that is the thrust of the article.
It feels like this might just be the spin that's put on it by Breitbart and then exaggerated by Alex.
And in reality, I think that there's probably just bigotry behind this.
I mean, I don't know what the secret classified document says, and Alex doesn't either.
But the article, when talking about these areas that are quote-unquote held by Islamists, it then immediately talks about this union of French Muslim Democrats.
So it seems to me that there might be some sort of a connection between the definition of held by Islamists and...
The UFMD pulls well in this place.
It seems like there might be a connection from the text.
I'm not entirely sure.
I don't trust Breitbart or Alex's spin on these sorts of issues.
I don't believe a single part of this story, and here's why.
For one, Alex seems to be trying to come up with a story here, and his brain isn't so fast, so he's just randomly cobbling together some bullshit.
Second, he has no video of this, yet his team was surrounding him with cameras the whole time he was in D.C. Third, he says that Muslims were messing with his wife because they know not to go frontal and mess with the man, but not ten seconds prior.
He just said that Muslims repeatedly threatened to conquer him while he was in D.C. So what is it?
Are they so bold that they openly threatened to conquer the big strong Alex, or are they so sneaky that they dare not confront big strong Alex but instead mess with his wife?
This shit is so incoherent, but it makes total sense.
If you look at it as just random bullshit Alex is making up to demonize Muslims because he hates Muslims.
But by making it the world religion, everyone then must submit to it.
And that's what the globalists have chosen.
And the Antichrist is going to try to enforce in the future a weird globalist, secularist system that is allied with Islam where it will be able to persecute whoever it wants.
And that you'll have to bow to it and to the beast at the same time.
Everything with Satan is a fraud and a contradiction.
You can see the whole thing coming clearly, clearly into view.
You gotta fight back against it and just do something.
Alex can't.
But I think part of that is because he knows how flimsy all of the thousand of news stories that he needs to cover are.
He can't get in any greater depth.
On that vaccine story, because he knows that as soon as he does, it becomes clear that this is a chicken vaccine.
He can't get in any greater depth about his complaints about the impeachment, because if he does, he then has to address the fact that this is the Democrats' opening statements portion of it.
He can't get in any greater depth about how Owen is being singularly persecuted, because if he does, it opens up the possibility of recognizing that left-wing people do get punished for this sort of thing.
He can't get in any greater depth about the no-go zones in France, because if he does...
This primary source that he's going back to doesn't necessarily prove what he's talking about.
He can't.
He has to get overwhelmed by the amount of news because all he can deal with is this surface.
I mean, what he could really do is, instead of having too much news to cover, he could take a few subjects and really make up some good bullshit about it.
So, Alex is wrestling when he gets back from commercial about how he maybe said he was going to take some calls or talk about news, but he hasn't done any of it.
There's more information that's needed to assess the realities of it and all that stuff.
You can't behave like this in issues of serious public health issues.
It's bad.
The Trump and Greta stuff, who cares?
This is nonsense.
Alex's only point is that she's not complaining about China.
And the issue is that with her advocacy, through the UN, filing a complaint on behalf of the children of a number of countries, she can't complain about China.
They're not signed on to that treaty.
So that kind of...
Falls apart the complaint of like, why isn't she singling out China as opposed to these countries that she has listed?
So, Alex, he has to address something because it's something that Tucker Carlson talked about on his show.
Otherwise, Alex would probably just fucking ignore this because he doesn't want any part of it.
But Tucker has brought it to the mainstream consciousness, and that is the fact that Trump and his Environmental Protection Agency are rolling back restrictions and regulations on atrazine, which, of course, is the chemical that is turning the freaking frogs gay.
But Trump is loosening those regulations and restrictions which will have the effect of leading to more atrazine being in the water which will make more frogs game.
So, like I said, atrazine's the chemical that's behind the moment that most people probably know Alex for.
The turning the freaking frogs gay rant.
Obviously, Alex doesn't understand the science behind the effects of atrazine pollution, but we've gotten into that in the past, and the more important thing here is that atrazine is not a chemical that's good for people to be exposed to in large quantities.
It's not going to turn people gay, like Alex might suggest, and all the available evidence seems to suggest that he's overblowing the dangers of it, but I feel like no pollution is good pollution, so whatever.
All agree that we should regulate the hell out of these pesticides and herbicides so they're only used appropriately.
This chemical is a gigantic part of Alex's career.
And now his hero, King Trump, is presiding over an EPA that wants to loosen regulations that experts say could increase atrazine contamination in waterways by up to 50%.
Another interesting move on the EPA's part is that they adjusted the amount of the chemical that's considered safe for humans to make easier for pollution to go unpunished.
The amount they decided on is taken straight from the primary manufacturer of atrazine, Syngenta.
Much like Bolsonaro attacking the press, this is bad, but shouldn't be a surprise for anyone.
Of course, Trump would sell out the safety and protections enjoyed by all the little people in the country to benefit a large business.
That's what he's into.
He's made it super clear.
But Alex can't ignore this one.
Tucker Carlson talked about it, and Atrazine is Alex's turf.
And for his hero to be doing the opposite of fighting against it, well, that's a problem.
Trump not further restricting atrazine would further imply to Alex's audience that he doesn't know or doesn't care about this chemical, which I guess is the angle Alex is going with?
And that seems like a really sad spin.
The best Alex can do is say that the Democrats are pushing regulations on a ton of stuff, so Trump didn't even look into the things that they were regulating and just set about undoing all of it.
That's what a child would do.
Alex is describing an idiot being in charge of the country.
And not for nothing, Alex is also being very clear that the Democrats were the ones who were doing what he wanted, which is to limit atrazine use.
This is true, going back to the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, which Bill Clinton signed into law.
That was about creating safety standards for pesticides, particularly aimed at protecting children's health.
So yeah, here we have a chemical that Alex believes is a part of a giant globalist attack on the public aimed at feminizing the men so they can't have Western civilization or whatever.
And what do we find?
We find Alex's big enemy, Bill Clinton, signing legislation to restrict its use.
And his hero, Trump, pushing to roll back these regulations and expose more people to it.
And the best Alex can come up with is that Trump is just exposing everyone to dangerous chemicals because the Democrats didn't want him to.
This is pathetic.
This is pathetic.
Even as a propagandist, this is just the weakest shit ever.
The Trump years and the last Obama year really changed.
For too long during Obama's years, I defended him.
Why didn't he close down Guantanamo Bay?
Well, these are the political realities of the time, and he's got to spend his capital this way.
And this whole thing with Trump and looking at Alex turning into this fucking weak, toady bullshit, I just realized that, no, there's no defending the president.
Fuck him.
If the president is doing some bullshit, then it doesn't matter what team you're on.
I just meant that it is a smart idea for us to have a baseline adversarial relationship with our government, regardless of whether or not it is the one that we have voted in.
They need to be held to the fire at all fucking time.
The last 70 years or so, atrazine in the water, the genitals, this is a uterine deformity that happens in the uterus.
During development of the fetus, where males slowly are having their genitals waste away until soon, men are going to have genitals the size of a woman's clitoris in about two generations.
So I looked into it a little bit and there are some instances of like genital malformation that can be attributed to or potentially attributed to atrazine exposure.
But what I think Alex is mistaken, because it's not a giant issue that is noted from Atrazine, I think he's mixing up congenital and genital.
Because all the phones are tapped and all the rest of it, and when they open up the criminal investigation of myself and Stone, I've been under criminal investigation as a Russian as well.
I don't need Trump to have other journalists contact me and say the president wanted to thank you and really appreciate you and appreciate what you're doing.
I don't need to be patted on the head like I've told Trump when he calls me.
I need action from the president.
We've already seen bold action.
But we need to get on the offensive and we need to indict the deep state.
We need to indict big tech for racketeering and suppression and just every crime you can imagine.
And I know you're giving us action on so many fronts.
I'm just simply telling you it's what the people want.
It's what's right.
It's what we need to see happen.
But I know who can take action.
And that's the listeners and the viewers of this broadcast.
We are the voice and the heart and the soul and the spirit of Americana.
The fusion of the Republic in 1776 with real Christianity.
Not fake, in-your-face Pharisees, holier-than-thou stuff.
Just I love God.
I want to take action.
And I know you do, too.
Let's do it together.
And that's why funding us and buying products, InfoWarsStore.com, and signing up for AutoShip to be able to, you know, recurring support us and get great products at the same time is so critical.
I don't have to apologize to corn farmers to tell them that you notice that farmers in those areas have a lot of cancers, a lot of problems, and your daughters can't have children, and your sons basically can't have sex because they don't have genitals.
Now, I mean, you heard, that's putting it lightly, that the testicles don't descend on a lot of people.
But, you know, if dad's wondering why he had a good-sized Johnson and his son basically doesn't have a penis, it's because atrazine, okay?
It's not a lot of matter.
And, of course, those cancerous sons are going to get.
So they need to ban atrazine, and they've got a lot of other pesticides that don't do this.
Still not good for your liver.
But atrazine bioaccumulates.
table and it stays there for years.
I'm going to tell farmers something.
And yeah, I'm going to try to fund ourselves at the same time.
If you live and get municipal water or you've got well water or you live anywhere near farming, you are insane if you don't use a gravity filter that takes out all the bad chemicals but leaves the good minerals in.
And that's the Alexa Pure Breeze, the highest rated filtration system you're going to find out there for anywhere near the price.
This is a perfect example of a situation where it appears like Alex's content on the show is actually being informed by what he sells.
The reason for this is that he doesn't appear to be saying accurate things about atrazine in order to make his farmer listeners scared of their water, then offering them a solution for a price.
All the stuff Alex seems to be getting about dick shrinking, like I said, I think it's, if I had to guess, it's him not understanding what congenital means.
I think he just is misunderstanding words and then ranting about them.
From the data I've seen from the NIH, there are some very small indications of possible genital deformations connected to atrazine exposure, but it's nowhere near the top of concerns.
Like heart-related issues, for example, are far more common.
The big giveaway that Alex is talking shit here is that he says that atrazine bioaccumulates.
This is not true.
According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, a division of the Department of Health and Human Services, if humans take in atrazine, it is, quote, primarily excreted in the urine.
And, quote, some atrazine and its metabolites might enter the organs or fat tissue, but they do not bioaccumulate or build up or remain in the human body.
Well, from the same report by the ATSDR, in their section about atrazine and the environment, quote, atrazine does not tend to bioaccumulate.
Another report put out by the ATSDR found that it doesn't bioaccumulate in fish and, quote, little food chain accumulation of atrazine has been observed.
it does not tend to bioaccumulate.
unidentified
A 2014 paper put out by the Journal of Environmental Science and Pollution Research showed some promise of...
Antrazine is a chemical with a fairly short half-life, between 14 and 109 days in the atmosphere.
When it's in the human body, it's only detectable for approximately 48 hours, since it's flushed out really quickly.
None of this is to say that it's perfectly safe or doesn't still pose a risk, particularly in utero, but the story that Alex is telling is specifically not true.
Atrazine is a chemical that researchers have found is not prone to bioaccumulation.
He's saying that it is, or as I call it, lying because it creates a problem for his listeners.
These listeners will then have a reaction of getting scared of their water and how it's going to make their sons have no dicks.
And there is Alex with the perfect solution, this giant water filter that he sells.
Alex talks all the time about the globalists using the Hegelian dialectic, where they create a problem to cause a reaction in the public so they can be there with a solution to the problem they themselves have created.
It turns out that this is also a very apt way to describe Alex's own business model.
And when I say this, this is going to be incredibly obvious.
Oh, wow, Alex, that's...
Tell us the grass is green next, but of all the reasons they keep this impeachment going and the fake investigations going and all of it is, first and foremost, to change the subject from what losers they are and how their cities are collapsing and how corrupt they are and how evil they are and to keep Trump on the defense and to hog up all the time and energy and to be the center of attention.
But the reason they've got to keep the impeachment going as long as possible...
It's almost even more damning just to listen to the Republican defense of it, just because what could they possibly have other than it's a deep state conspiracy?
Right, and that's right in line with what Alex wants to cover.
Basically, all I hear is him just abdicating any kind of responsibility to address points that are brought up by non-Nunes, Trump's lawyers, Jim Jordan types.
He doesn't want it.
He doesn't want to address any kind of thing that's not already implicitly and intrinsically on his side.