In Knowledge Fight’s #382, Alex Jones and guest Steve Pieczenik (a self-proclaimed ex-spy chief) push wild claims—Epstein’s survival via "ear discrepancies," Rabin’s assassination as a "depression-related coup," and Texas/Florida seceding despite $506B in federal funds. Jones frames Trump’s enemies as Satanic pedophiles, demands Stone’s pardon before his Feb. 7 sentencing, and urges callers to chant violent slogans while monetizing their rage via Infowars merch. Richard Reeve’s absurd "flag expansion" fantasy (adding Uruguay or Australia) underscores the show’s blend of conspiracy theater and financial exploitation, leaving hosts Dan Friesen and Jordan Holmes to warn of its real-world dangers—fueling QAnon-style violence without accountability. [Automatically generated summary]
So I would say about the first 20 minutes or so of this episode is just Alex trying to stress that the audience, to the audience, that without them, he can't do anything.
He keeps using this metaphor that the audience is the gun and he himself is creating bullets for them to shoot.
These bullets are useless without guns, and he really needs you to shoot people with his information.
It's something that Alex says a lot, but there seems to be a particular focus on this episode of this idea that, you know, it almost feels like there was a meeting behind the scenes where they decided that they really need to focus on raising engagement.
Alex also promises a big report on the evils of vaccines set to drop on Christmas morning, which you can then post all over social media and hopefully ruin everyone you know's holiday.
The war on Christmas isn't saying happy holidays, it's producing nonsense anti-vex social media content for everyone to put all over the place.
You wake up, you're like, what the fuck?
unidentified
Yeah, yeah, that makes Christmas lunch so much better.
Well, when he talks about it being a real victory that all these people are awake to the power structure and what have you, he compares it to a different victory that happened historically.
And I do feel like he's comparing that victory unfavorably to the current victory.
So I don't know if you want to, like a couple days before Christmas, particularly want to be talking about how when Jesus died for your sins, that was a victory.
It does seem to be just based on sentence structure that Alex believes somehow 30% of the population believing what he believes is a greater victory than Jesus dying for our sins on the cross.
Yeah, I think there's a piece of it that's certainly offensive to the Revolutionary War, but I think I'm more interested, a little more interested in denigrating what should be a pivotal moment in history for him.
But here is Michelle Wolf in her latest event on stage in front of a couple thousand people cheering, talking about a mother killing her baby so that she has power and plays God.
There's never been a more satanically pure statement made.
This is the definition of Satanism.
Here it is.
unidentified
You know, we talk about it so negatively that you feel like you should have this sense of shame after you get an abortion.
Well, you can feel any way you want after you get an abortion.
Get one.
See how you feel.
You know how my abortion made me feel very powerful.
Like, Alex in the past, the very recent past, has made a huge deal out of being one of those free speech types, especially as it relates to comedy.
All the people complaining about racism are just uptight SJWs.
PewDiePie is just joking when he has people hold up signs and say, kill the Jews.
It's totally a fun joke how Count Dankula taught his dog to seek Heil.
It's comedy and encroaching on comedy is an attack on language and the First Amendment.
But now Michelle Wolf has made a joke he disagrees with, so it's pure Satanism.
This is just sad.
And more to the point, it's lazy.
It's lazy as hell.
Alex provides no cogent argument for why this joke Michelle Wolfe made is normalizing something, and the other jokes he's defended that offended other people are not.
The exact same line of attack he's taking here applies equally well to Count Ankula's supposed joke.
He's normalizing Nazism.
Here, Alex is embodying the very behavior he claims to hate so much in the left.
And if I were Paul Joseph Watson, I would make a video complaining that he's virtue signaling.
All over the world, civilizations are discovered that had plenty of water and plenty of food when they collapsed.
And there's not even signs of disease, but they're all gone.
And you know what they always find?
Giant masses of skeletons that have been eaten.
Just a few months ago, archaeologists in Germany found a town in Germany that's about 8,000 years old.
And they found tens of thousands of skeletons that had been butchered and eaten.
And the scientists studied it and found out they were people from all over Europe, some of them over 2,000 miles away that had been taken there to be eaten.
I meant to cover that story on air.
You can just type it in.
Stone Age town found in Germany was based on cannibalism.
At this site, archaeologists have found 12 burial pits that appear to go back to the first century BCE.
One of the things that they're saying is really notable about this find is that the people there were buried using different types of funeral rituals.
That isn't super shocking since Poland is in the middle of an area where there's a rich archaeological tradition with very old sites from various Germanic tribes being found fairly regularly, but it's still not like why that's the case is not a completely answered question.
Like, why are there so many different styles of burial in the same site?
So the varying funeral traditions, as well as the presence of trinkets from pretty far away, are both aspects of the site that make it a very compelling one for researchers.
But literally, nothing I can find about this story involves cannibals.
There's no indication that anyone was brought to this town from far away to be eaten.
There are no archaeologists who are studying the actual site or saying any of this kind of stuff.
Quite frankly, unless there's some stories that I'm missing, and I've read a number of them, so I don't know.
Maybe there's some weird one that I missed.
I'm inclined to say that Alex is literally making all of this up.
I have two possible explanations for what I think might be going on.
The first is that he might be making this up because I know that he never reads stories, just he reads headlines and then riffs on them.
The headline in The Express about the discovery of this site is: quote, Archaeology Shock: Gruesome discovery of mass graves and mystery urns stuns archaeologists, which you could see Alex turning into a story of finding the remains of a cannibal community.
And none of that's based on anything except his fucked up head.
The other possible explanation is that Alex is taking details from this new dig site and combining it with details about Herxheim, a very famous grave, mass grave site in Germany that was discovered in 1996 and definitely showed signs of ritualistic cannibalism taking place at the time of about 5000 BCE.
A 2009 study of that site, Herxheim, did strongly suggest that the inhabitants there practiced cannibalism based on particular cut wounds found on bones.
But that's not really a consensus among the academic community.
Some believe that it's more likely that the dead had rituals performed on them where their flesh was removed from their body before being buried, which isn't historically or archaeologically unheard of.
I can't even find anything close to the data that Alex is using here.
I have no idea.
Like, nothing I can find comes close to the contention that 60 to 70% of young people are opposed to all abortion.
In fact, all the credible data I can find on this issue is the exact opposite.
The most recent polling from Pew Research from this summer had support for all or most abortion being legal, standing at 61%, which is the highest point that question has polled at in over 20 years.
The only groups that have levels of opposition to abortion that are close to what Alex is saying are white evangelicals at 77% and Republicans at 62%.
Every article about the next generation is either they are leading the charge in the fight to make the world a better place or they're destroying craft breweries.
Those are the only two types of article about the young people.
And ironically, now I can say because an Israeli operative died, I was involved in a coup, which Israelis did not know, the assassination of Rabin.
This is the first ever heard of because I had interviewed Rabin and I found him to be exceedingly depressed.
I related to one of BB's right-hand man, and in turn, Rabin was assassinated, not for the Oslo agreement, but because he was so depressed he could not function.
I don't even want to play games where I start taking anything Steve says seriously, but it's fun that he's now announcing he was involved in the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin.
Maybe it is part of his mythology that he was there under Clinton, but either way, there's no evidence he was there past 1979, so I don't believe any of this shit.
Alex really wants Steve to talk about Epstein on this episode.
For one, the picture of Epstein alive that they use for the comparison was taken 15 years ago.
The only facial features that are supposedly suspicious and being different in the pictures are the nose and ears, which are made of cartilage and change in appearance over time, sometimes significantly.
This is some super flimsy, super dumb conspiracy clickbait shit that Alex is now using to help prop up the mad ramblings of Steve Pieczenik.
In the past, I've talked a lot about how Alex keeps getting fooled by Steve into believing stuff that gets him in trouble.
But honestly, I've seen it happen enough now, and I keep seeing Alex do it to himself.
I don't know if he thinks that what he's doing is playing Devil's Advocate, but in reality, Alex is just talking himself into believing Steve, which has been a huge disaster.
If you believe Steve Pieczenik, you have to believe that he has set in motion literally every important thing that has happened in the geopolitical scene for like the last 50 years.
Between him and Leo Zagami, we have everything from prior to and post 9-11, including 9-11.
Yeah.
But Alex is always trying to like, like in that clip, you know, he's like, okay, well, you said something that sounds crazy, but you know, when you think about it, the ear didn't look the same.
So I suppose, you know, that part of your theory is correct.
The other part is the impeachment part, where Nancy Pelosi is basically the joker in this movie, where in her own mind, she thinks she's wonderful.
This is her Swan song, but this is the Swan song to the entire House of Representatives, because in a time where we really don't need representatives in an arcane model, we are working with the internet.
We're not a democracy.
If we had a democracy, as Ross Barrow said, we would be punching our computers and just voting constantly on our own.
So basically, the representational government will decrease in importance to governors in the South.
And Alex doesn't seem to at all recognize that what he's talking about is pretty much complete deconstruction of a lot of the structure of government that is in the Constitution.
When you get a movie like The Irishman, which costs $180 million and it's junk, I vote for the Academy Awards and I'll vote for a movie like Harriet that costs $3 million, but $180 million for Robert De Niro, who doesn't even serve our country, who shoots his mouth off against the president, a man who's never had a formal education, a man who went to the Red School, which is a communist school, never really could articulate anything or write anything decent,
I could kind of believe that maybe if he, but I don't know if any of the movies that Tom Clancy's had made are ones that Steve has anything to do with.
So I think that Steve is super, super naive about what it would look like for either Texas or Florida to secede from the United States.
For one, they would then become independent countries and they'd have to work out trade arrangements with the rest of the United States as well as other countries, which would be pretty difficult, particularly without being able to enjoy the weight of the rest of the U.S. economy that really helps create those trade relationships.
Pretty sure he is assuming that they do not even need those and that they can become self-sufficient nation states, obviously, because they have all the resources they need.
Sure, there's some resources, but not probably enough for a fully sustainable economy.
Geographically, neither Texas nor Florida is what you'd call in an optimal position.
Florida is basically a peninsula of the United States, and Texas wouldn't even be able to block off transit to and from South and Central America since there's the New Mexico and Arizona borders to consider.
So it wouldn't even be able to create some sort of a blockade or whatever to create essentialness for it to be involved in a trade rule.
In the past year, Florida received over $237 billion from the federal government, or the equivalent of $2,187 per resident of the state.
Texas took in about $269 billion.
These are the second and third highest totals of any state in the country.
So sure, good luck.
Keep yelling your dumb, dumb shit that the South has risen again and get your fan base excited.
But make no mistake about the reality of this.
The reality of what Steve is saying and what he's suggesting would be a complete disaster for the people of Florida and Texas.
And with all due respect to Florida and Texas, which I, you know, I care about the residents of both of those states, it would only be a relative inconvenience for the rest of the United States.
A lot of this sounds like to people like this guy sounds crazy, all these exaggerations, but I've actually looked at the history books.
You did run the Camp David Accords, the only successful deal.
You were involved with the pole pot stuff.
You were involved in the Soviet Union.
You've done all this stuff because you actually do work instead of sit around and talk about how you're an intelligence hop and sit around in a bar bragging and patting each other on the back.
I think you should all get together within your own groups and start writing letters and, you know, sending Twitter or however you want to communicate to Trump that we support him, but we need to have a tougher approach in the next administration.
Like, I don't think he wants his, like, you know, most people, when they dream of a utopia, it's like, oh, people are holding hands and shit like that.
Well, InfraWars has been around a long time, and it's very rare when you have a man like Alex Jones who can predict four months or six months before 9-11 that we were going to have 9-11.
And when I heard that, I said, God bless this individual.
So Alex takes the break on the 24th, 5th, and 6th, and he comes back on the 27th.
And I'm going to say he's coming in hot on the 27th.
He claims that it's just because he hasn't been on air for a little while, so he's got ahead of steam.
But in reality, I think it's because Trump had given a press conference where he was asked about pardoning Roger Stone, and he said he hadn't really thought about it.
Over the Christmas break, the two days we took off, President Trump had a press conference, and he talked about Roger Stone, because the question got raised to him.
He said, oh, I haven't really thought about that.
Which means he's not ready to make a statement on it.
Formality, and that's not ground I'm gonna cover it again.
I know you all know that, but this speaks the whole issue.
If Trump won't start indicting these people and these rogue government agencies, these bad cops, as he calls them, well, then what does it say if they're just left alone?
It says it's open season on anybody that supports Trump and say, Okay, Sean Hanney's ready to lose his job.
So Tucker Carlson.
Alex Jones has got him trying to put him in prison, speaking to third person and suing the hell out of me, and lying about my family, and paying former employees to tell huge lies.
So I'm going to have to sue so that other people know they can't just lie about me.
But that all takes money.
So I'm going to get into this and Trump in a moment.
And I love Trump.
But his biggest failure is that he can't get the Justice Department to do their damn job.
Illegally spying on a candidate, doing it once they're president, lying to Congress about it is illegal.
And I've got CIA hearings and Defense Department hearings.
It's not the military coming after me.
It's all the Ivy Leaguers that have these intelligence clearances, literally calling me an enemy agent and talking about how they're trying to shut me down.
That means shuts you down.
And I'm pissed.
I'm an American citizen being run over by a bunch of America-hating scum that openly say they hate this country.
And then they sit there in Congress and I'm not in those hearings getting to challenge them.
Like, if he goes and starts protesting at Trump rallies, all it is is promotional stunts for himself.
That's really all it is.
But who cares?
Alex complains that, like, you know, he did bring up the Department of Justice not doing their job.
And a big part of that is they need to fucking put Biden in jail.
It's open and shut.
So Giuliani was on TV talking about how he's going to, if he just had two people and they put him in a position where he could do it, he could prosecute all these dirty actors.
He's very convinced that the case against Joe Biden will be open and shut because, like a classic globalist, he went all over television and confessed to his crimes.
He bragged about them.
It's in the white papers.
You know, the deal.
If you pay close attention, though, you'll notice how Alex Jones engages in narrative sleight of hand.
He's so worked up in his feelings that the rant moves and flows smoothly.
But he's very intentionally inserted a lie in there that's meant to support the very passion that he's expressing.
Biden didn't want that prosecutor fired because they were investigating his son.
But the rest of the stuff that Alex is saying is true, inasmuch as Biden did give a speech where he told the story of threatening to hold up money to Ukraine if they didn't remove that prosecutor.
But this truth is only there to mask the presentation of the lie, which is that Biden's motives were personal and corrupt.
This is a pretty important trick for propagandists and conspiracy theorists.
Most of the time, an audience like Alex's probably wouldn't even notice, or most of them are probably, they already believe that that narrative is true.
By intertwining lies with real things, you create a situation where you can just play a clip of Biden saying that they had until he got on his plane to fire this prosecutor, and your audience will experience it as if the motive part, the part where he was trying to stop an investigation of his son, that's what's being proven by the clip that doesn't show that.
You can prove the true part, but the lie is a lie.
Connect the truth to a lie, then demonstrate the truth, and plenty of people will accept the lie as part of the demonstrated truth.
On a super basic level, this is kind of what Alex does all the time with headlines.
He can prove the headline by flashing it up on the screen, but he can't really prove all the nonsense bullshit that he riffs about the stories.
So when he tries to establish something he says is true, he just references headlines.
As an example, consider Bill Joy's article in Wired called Why the Future Doesn't Need Us.
Alex has said a thousand times that that article is about how Bill Joy went to a conference of high-end tech people who they debated whether to kill off humanity or turn us into a dumbed-down massive blobs sucked into video games or some shit.
But what he is doing, he's taking these sensationalizing things about it because he knows that it's very popular with people online and he's using it to draw attention to his products.
I don't want to get too deep into this, so I'm just going to give you a brief sketch of what Alex is talking about here.
He thinks he's cracked the case and discovered that Epstein's operation is still up and running because he just found out about a company called Aviloop.
This is an aviation branding and like flight school classes operation business that's run by a woman named Nadia Moroshenko, who she definitely has ties to Epstein.
I have no idea about the larger picture of her involvement with him, nor do I know if Aviloop has anything to do with his crimes necessarily.
But I do know that she was a figure who was questioned about this matter as far back as 2010.
So Alex isn't really breaking new ground on the subject.
The Aviloop aspect of the story isn't really even new either.
Heavy published an article that discusses her weird commercials, the ones that Alex is calling brothel commercials back in August.
Legitimately, the only thing Alex here is doing, he's taking kernels of things that actual outlets have already covered and adding a layer of conspiratorial, they're going to kill me for covering this bullshit to it.
Alex put out a special report that was a little over an hour on Christmas that he teased as being an interview with a whistleblower, like he mentioned on the 23rd.
It was just a guy who'd done some digging into the Epstein story from a pretty conspiratorial angle and insisted on being filmed in the shadows.
It's just a guy mumbling through suggestive information about Eviloop as if it's breaking news and also weirdly laughing a couple times while trying to get through his script.
Not like that laughing, but like, okay, I don't can't quite tell if it's like nervous laughter or what, but it's very strange and it's uninspiring.
In 2019, they announced starting in Vegas and starting in places like that because they know you're going to Vegas to have fun and so you'll put up with whatever they want you to do.
Face scanning.
But there was a backlash to standing there and being face scanned.
And of course, they're going to let the illegal aliens in, anyways.
Illegal aliens are allowed to hit and run, rob, steal, kill.
Right off the bat, it should be pointed out that driver's licenses are given out by the state, not by the federal government.
So the rules in each specific state will vary a little bit.
What I'm going to lay out is not like it's generally true, but there might be slight differences state to state.
That said, at no point will I gloss over a major anomaly.
There are currently 15 states where undocumented immigrants can apply for driver's licenses.
And there will likely be more added to that list soon, as a number of states have bills in the works surrounding the issue.
In most of these cases, all that was really done is to allow a piece of foreign identification to be substituted for the regularly required social security card as a form of ID needed to be given a driver's license.
I did not know what the breakdown is on this state by state, but from everything I can tell, this works exactly the same as if you and I were to apply for a driver's license, just with slightly different document requirements.
Know that in some states you don't have to retake the driving portion of the test if you're applying for a license and your old one hasn't expired or if it just recently expired.
So I assume there may be some states that allow that in these cases too.
Like if you have a current driver's license from Mexico, let's say, you might not have to retake the driving portion.
Maybe, but I feel like circumstances like that aren't the norm.
One of the main arguments surrounding these measures in favor of it is that some research has indicated that licensing immigrants who were previously unauthorized to drive improves safety greatly.
One obvious reason is that they're required to pass the test.
Yes, that usually, which Alex is just pretending isn't the case, but he's just making that up.
Sure.
Another reason that this is important is that if they have license, they can get car insurance, which makes things way safer for everyone.
Most of the metrics you'd really want to focus on are improved by issuing licenses to undocumented immigrants.
State revenues increase, overall safety improves, people are able to pursue work opportunities more easily that aren't connected to public transit.
The only real way to be against this is if you really want undocumented immigrants to be miserable and ultimately gone, which is clearly where Alex is coming from.
That seems to be all that's going on.
So you remember at the beginning of this episode, Alex was mad at Trump.
And that's why they're all going to be indicted next week.
Everything's fine.
As we one go, we all go.
In fact, you Q guys are welcome to call in too next time when I get the number out.
Tell me.
Tell me how I'm wrong.
Tell me about the magic, the power, the insight.
Q made this new video exposing Epstein that's on Bandai video.
Do you know Q did that?
Yeah, absolutely freaking lutely.
Q was up here on Christmas Eve.
Thank God for Q.
We salute you, Q. Thank you for two weeks.
they're all indicted two weeks they're all indicted two weeks they're all indicted two weeks they're all indicted two weeks they're all indicted two weeks they're all indicted all i've heard is talk so far so So I want to talk about all that too.
But I'm going to get to the president's press conference.
And now I honestly also feel like even beyond that, that angle is the like, it's the same sort of thing as like, if only he'd listened to like Max Kaiser way back when he was telling him to get into Bitcoin, he could have made millions on it.
And if he would have just gotten on board with Q in the right way, he probably could have made a killing off it.
And I think there's that missed opportunity that like the opposite of buyer's remorse that he probably feels.
And like you see all of these accounts all over Twitter with huge, massive audiences that are all fake that are not retweeting them.
So you can't let criminals keep doing what they're doing.
Like, oh, we're going to let them try to rob a bank again the last five times they got stopped.
But you didn't lock them up.
You let them go organize again and try to rob the bank again and come in and point their guns at us and pull all these scams and ride rough shot over conservatives and Christians and bully everybody.
I'm tired of it.
And I'm not going to sit here and take it.
We need action, President Trump.
All right, I'm going to give the number out.
I want to get your take on what Trump needs to do in the new year.
It's, I don't know if it's infuriating to watch so many of these guys like Alex and just come so dangerously close to realizing that they've been scammed, that they've been grifted.
They don't, they just can't cross that line.
He's so close to realizing what everybody knew in 2015, what he knew in 2015, which is that Trump was grifting them.
So Alex comes back after the break, and he's talking about, you know, earlier he said that he was trying to brainstorm what to name this clip to get Trump's attention.
And I think he realizes that whenever he gets mad at Trump, he gets Trump's attention.
I haven't really looked at Trump's Twitter account in quite a while.
So I decided to check and see if he tweeted out any of Alex's stuff lately.
Holy shit.
What a mistake.
That Twitter feed is just drowning in stupid memes and retweets of obviously fake accounts.
This would be really upsetting as a feed if you just saw it from anyone, let alone the president.
It was not a fun glimpse.
And I realized really quickly why I tend to ignore his feed as well as pretty much most of social media.
It was a disaster area.
But it's my journalistic duty to at least scratch the surface of these things.
So I went back to see if Trump really did push Alex's stuff after Alex got mad at him.
I figured that the time that Alex said Trump had committed treason and maybe working for the literal devil would be the best recent example of that.
And that happened on December 4th.
If Alex's premise is correct, then you'd expect to see some Infowars around that time.
I did see two tweets where Trump was retweeting the Trump organization's promotional tweets about Mar-a-Lago opening for the 2019-2020 season with the caption, I will be there in two weeks.
I saw plenty of Infowars type information flying around, but I didn't see any direct evidence of Trump tweeting out Infowar stuff or other people's stuff.
I think Alex just perceives that Trump throws them a bone whenever he starts getting mad, but I don't know if that's true.
When the mafia goes and harasses, say, all the cleaners in a certain part of a city and tells them if you don't pay us protection money, something bad's going to happen to your drivers that are picking up laundry.
Those are famous cases.
And then when they don't, somebody firebombs the laundry or the grocery store.
The FBI goes and they arrest the members of the mafia that came in and threatened the store owners.
That's why mafia like that never took off in places like Texas.
Because if you walked in to a dry cleaner's in Texas with a Texan owning it and you said you're going to give us money or something bad is going to happen to your business, you would be killed right there.
You would be killed.
I mean, my grandfathers were just normal Texans, nice guys, super, went to church, helping.
If you came into their business and said, we want money or we're going to kill you, they'd pull a gun out and shoot you dead.
Everybody knew that.
That's why you didn't do that.
They'd kill you just like that.
People that I grew up around, the last group of Texans, would kill you just like that.
Nothing that Alex is saying is true, but it feels true to him because how he's mythologized the Texan.
His ego is so wrapped up in this legendary character that it seems impossible to him that any Texan would be shaken down by a criminal.
That's just his feelings.
He has no idea what he's talking about.
And it makes no sense.
Shouldn't he know that there was mafia in Texas based on his JFK conspiracies about Jack Ruby and his associations with Sam Giancana and Joseph Campese?
Trump and the Republicans are going to go to war with the deep state and they're going to remove these devil worshiping scum or Trump needs to be removed.
Period.
And we need to get somebody in there that'll do something about all this because I'm done.
And it turns out all Trump would need to do to stop all civil unrest in this country is bust some Antifa leaders because then you'd find their contracts like the one he found on 4chan and it would lead all the way up to the I refuse to believe that he says this.
Planning to violate citizens' civil rights to keep people from having their speech and to trigger race riots that target local government police departments to overthrow city governments and install globalist over cities in blue cities that aren't under their total control and some red cities.
I mean, if I remember my Shelly correctly, I do believe the townsfolk, upon being confronted with Frankenstein's monster, decided to hold a free and fair trial and let him out on bail, made sure that everything was.
Look, the funnier thing is Alex's take on the N-word tape thing.
Yeah.
Because if you recall, what happened there was someone trolled Paul Joseph Watson by sending him a Twitter direct message and saying that they were a producer with the ABC, CBI.
We are now about three and a half days out from this historic event taking place.
And Paul Watson wrote a big story yesterday concerning an NBC source.
And it looks credible.
I'm not saying the report's credible.
I'm saying that the source, it looks like, is at NBC.
We have quite a few sources.
I'll just leave it at that.
But there's a tape compilation going back over the 14 seasons or whatever of The Apprentice with him sitting in the chair saying things like his son's retarded and making dirty jokes.
I mean, and supposedly the N-word.
You know, the thing about Trump, whether this is true or not, is to talk to people that have known him for a long time is he does like to basically tell dirty jokes, anything that a comedian would do.
And he doesn't even do it that often, but almost like a stress reliever or a way to break the ice.
He will sit there and a lot of times actually deprecate himself as well.
you think that trump doesn't say the n-word you're insane to me i mean if you that's crazy if you look at the decisions he's made about like uh renting his apartments the central park five i think you'd be yeah you'd it's be It's beyond credulity to imagine.
Alex's take on this person who was trolling him on Twitter was to say that he looks credible without looking into it at all and then do damage control.
Dan, are you telling me every fucking how do they how does it still happen?
Isn't that it's bonkers to me?
The idea that you would trust the guy who's currently in government any more than the previous guy in government to bring the Marines in to get rid of their enemies.
Right.
Even if that even if that's real, it's always used to turn everybody into addicts.
Trump said all these things and talked a good talk while he was out on the campaign trail talking about you being locked up when Hillary said that it's a good thing his people with his temperament aren't allowed into law enforcement.
We're done waiting.
We're done sitting here on our hands being told next week, next week it's going to happen.
The indictments are coming down.
We're done.
We're done with the talk.
Like you said earlier, with what Mar said, let's fish or cut bait.
Let's do it.
We're done, waiting.
We're done sitting out here trying to rub two teams together to pay our bills while people are here making millions and billions off of positions and political offices that they've got and they've given it to their children.
We're done.
I don't know about you guys, but in Oklahoma, the good old boys up here, we're about done.
We're done with the talk.
We're done with the waiting.
We're gonna make something happen.
Whether that be good, bad, or in between.
What tyrant has ever given up that power peacefully?
What tyrant has ever walked away without there being bloodshed?
There will be blood, and there's some of us who are ready to shed it.
Well, Casey, I would say that they've gone way past the point of where people don't have a right to take action physically.
The problem is they've set it up where they make us the villains at that point.
That's why it's critical to put that violence into action politically, viciously in free speech.
You got a great spirit and great voice there.
And just imagine how much energy you can expand waking people up and letting Trump know that you want action ahead of having to use that type of energy in violence.
They want to start an offensive operation.
You just heard the last caller, and he was dead, dead right.
They want to false flag us.
Obviously, we never target innocent people at a Walmart.
Obviously, we wouldn't just target the police.
Obviously, no, no.
I don't want to target anybody, but people like Nancy Pelosi, people like her son, people like Hunter Biden, all these criminals that think they're above the law, thumbing their nose at us.
Why are they the ones that are never the targets of political violence?
Why is it always a church?
Why is it always innocent people?
Because most of it's staged.
It's anti-foot posing.
They've been caught as patriots carrying out violence.
So I hear your anger, Casey, and God bless you.
But put that anger into action.
Go to a Trump rally peacefully and just wait till he pauses and then say, Pardon Roger Stone, Infowars.com.
And they'll know you're friendly.
They'll agree with you.
And they start saying, InfoWars, InfoWars.
And I bet the chant gets picked up.
And that sends a message to everybody.
And it puts a giant target on my back.
Hey, it's already so big, just make it 10 times bigger.
When you create a really highly intense thing and then give expectations of, hey, the thing that you're really angry about is going to come and this guy is going to deliver it when you know full well that's not going to come.
Eventually they're going to get to the point where they're really fed up and feel like they're devoid of any other outlet other than this anger and this violent expression.
That's what this caller is manifesting.
It's the logical endpoint of a certain amount of people who get sucked into things like Q. Yep.
So he's expressing this and like, I, you know, there's going to be blood and I'm ready to shed it.
That is, that is like if you have whipped people up into that much of a frenzy, if he had been in public saying that to all of his fans, they would have booed him roundly.
There is no way.
You don't whip up a mob frenzy and then go, and now, whoa, whoa, whoa, you guys are acting all crazy.
He's trying to transmute this violent anger that is the natural end point of the disappointment of these aspiring authoritarian followers.
And he's trying to take that and be like, how can I monetize this?
Instead of recognizing it as a really dangerous sign about what the community that he speaks to is like a very high percentage of these callers are deeply disturbing calls.
And I've never found his calls to be great or healthy.
No, it feels like for the past, what, 13 years, the right-wing media machine has been edging 18 to 35-year-old men with the white mouth violent guns with all these guns and then just never let giving them that release.
And now it's really coming to the point of a boil.
Yeah, I mean, like, all Alex is doing there is, I mean, it is an extension of what Richard is bringing, that there should be expansionism, bring back the days of colonial empiring and whatnot, which probably isn't a good idea.
And then at the same time, the third element of it is this input from callers is growing to a point of really scary input that mirrors some pretty scary things Alex is saying.