Today, Dan and Jordan discuss the day prior to and the day of Roger Stone's conviction, and how things played out on The Alex Jones Show. In this installment, Alex seems to reach point of exasperation with Trump not helping his allies, and another familiar face returns from the distant past.
So today, Jordan, of course, on Mondays, we're generally back in the past, going over 2013, seeing how Alex has progressed after the Sandy Hook shooting and the Boston bombing now.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I enjoy what these gents do, I'd like to support the show, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show, we'd appreciate it.
They want to basically railroad Roger Stone, as we all know.
And once they set the precedent for that, they think they're going to railroad everybody else.
And it's real tyranny.
And it's woken a lot of people up.
And I've learned a lot of really horrible things about the trial from the Stone camp last night and this morning.
And from some reporters that are going to be joining us.
And this whole thing is a lot bigger than Roger Stone.
This is about due process in this country being flushed down the toilet.
Because once due process is gone, if you think there's already tyranny in this country, well, wait, we'll get as bad as North Korea, probably a lot worse, because we tend to do everything real big here in America.
I'd like to point out that yesterday on his show, Steve Pchenik was on talking about how due process doesn't work in the United States, and it's a joke.
And that's the next phase is the Democrats are now calling for there not to be a trial in the Senate.
Just if the House votes that impeachment proceedings have initiated, well, they already had the trial they're claiming, though that's not how it works with this show trial.
And so the Senate doesn't need one.
What?
unidentified
Because if they have a real trial, Trump will be totally and completely exonerated, just like Roger Stone would have been.
So, Alex goes on with his prediction here, and as you can see, very conveniently sets up the whatever the case, even if he's guilty, he's not guilty, narratives.
I am predicting that Roger Stone will be found guilty.
On all six counts, probably, by the rigged jury.
And believe me, is it rigged?
Remember, we exposed, it was in the news, that a major Democrat The official from the Obama administration, his husband worked at the Mueller probe, was selected for the jury.
When we exposed that and said you shouldn't have Obama or Hillary or anybody else that worked for him at a high level on the jury, they said I should be arrested for jury tampering when all I was doing was expose to corruption.
Of course, it turned out it was all totally legal.
But now we know that there are a bunch of other Obama officials and Hillary officials and spooks from the CIA are indeed...
On that jury, one juror clearly was supporting Stone.
She fell down yesterday and hit her head and was replaced by an alternate juror, as they call them.
It's really easy for Alex to come up with whatever disparaging thing he wants to say about some of these jurors because it's in D.C. So the odds are, in the jury pool, there are going to be some people with a history of civil service, perhaps.
And given that the last eight years prior to 2016 was during the Obama administration, it makes sense that some people might have some of that in their resume.
And they all had Trump bumper stickers on their trucks.
So, there's no indication that I can find that there's any foul play in the jury with Roger's trial, but it doesn't matter.
Alex made such a huge prediction and production out of trying and failing twice to identify the potential juror who worked for the Obama Office of Management and Budget, so now that narrative is firmly in place.
That woman didn't make the jury.
Alex was completely wrong about everything in that story, but because he established it as a clear indication of railroading, all he needs to do to prove to his audience that Roger was set up is to yell about that person who didn't even end up as a juror.
It's real flimsy work, but it does work, apparently.
I can't find any evidence that an elderly woman juror who was pro-Roger fell down and hit her head, which I'm sure Alex is bringing up to suggest was an inside job.
There's no reason to think that person was even a potential juror, let alone an actual one.
I would say it's probably impossible they made the jury considering they collapsed and received medical attention on the day the jury was being selected.
So if that's what he's trying to bring in, I'm not sure.
This is an incredibly important point in human history right now.
And I can tell you that when Roger is convicted, and I'm almost always right, maybe a miracle is going to happen.
You know, I talked to him last night and he said only a miracle of God right now is going to stop this.
And he said he wouldn't talk about what happened inside.
He's not going to give the judge any reason to nail him even harder.
So I talked to people who were in the courtroom, and they said that the jury shakes with hate at him and stares at him like they want to kill him in their virtue signaling to the media and to all of the intelligence agency operatives and Obama and Hillary officials that are in there staring at Roger like they want to kill him.
Imagine if I could guess at human behavior, assuming that most of these people don't have a wide breadth of knowledge regarding Roger Stone that we do, rather than shake with hatred, they probably all just kind of rolled their eyes a bunch whenever he talked, they were like, That's obviously bullshit.
How are you going to defend yourself when you have these text messages that you sent to Randy Credico where you're telling him, prepare to die, cocksucker.
Last night and this morning, and I've talked to a lot of the reporters that were in the trial yesterday where the closing statements of the defense and the prosecution ended at 10 a.m. Eastern about two and a half hours ago.
They began deliberations.
Now, Roger hasn't violated his gag order getting into the case with me.
He just said that he leaves it in God's hands and that he's praying for a miracle.
And then I talked to reporters like Joe Biggs, Jacob Ingalls, and others.
Not reporters.
And as soon as the verdict comes out, you're going to get to learn about what is undoubtedly...
The fakest trial I've ever heard of in U.S. history.
That might be like a poorly kept secret or whatever, but I've never heard about it, and Alex is the first person to bring it up to me, so I feel like he's revealing secrets.
I don't know.
But the truth is that the globalists just hated stone.
And so that's why they got enraged by Stone and were obsessed with him was because he was giving the president great advice.
Because they go back 44 years now.
And Stone used to be Trump's wingman, dating, and Trump's beard.
And again, Trump is not having a beard for homosexual sex.
Beards go the other way, too, where your buddy goes out with you and your girlfriend when you're famous so people don't know that you're out with your girlfriend.
They think it's their girlfriend.
And that's what Stone and Trump go way back in, is originally sometimes dating the same women.
I really wish the mainstream media would twist this story and so I could get a fantastic chyron of just Stone and Trump Eiffel Towered same woman and just moving it on.
I'm really surprised how much I'm worried about Roger Stone.
I mean, I like the guy.
I know the guy.
He's a man.
I'm a man.
He knows the business he's in.
It's a dangerous game fighting these tyrants.
But just to watch them systematically rig the media, rig the indictment, rig the jury, and to learn the judge laughing and snorting and cackling and not letting him have any of his witnesses.
But it's really good for the court of public opinion.
It's really good for Alex that Roger didn't take the stand and didn't call any witnesses because externally you could look at that as the judge didn't let him take the stand.
unidentified
If only Roger could have got up there, he would have been Jack Nicholson and a few good men.
Ladies and gentlemen, I've got a message to you from Roger Stone, who's got a gag ball in his mouth, politically right now, and who is facing certain conviction, in my view, any minute now, at the hands of a true kangaroo court.
And the railway that Judge Jackson has built from the federal courthouse directly into federal prison for Donald John Trump's longtime wingman.
He's trying to stress it because of, I think he wants to really play up the idea that they're trying to attack Trump's support network personally, as opposed to it being, Roger did things that are illegal, and he's going to be punished for it.
I get the sense that this is teasing for the sake of trying to build anticipation, try and get people to tweet about it, get more audience, get more eyes on it.
He is such a rangy, unpredictable player with this sort of stuff that a normal, rational human, I would see that behavior as an indication that this isn't real.
First things first, Alex is doing one of his old tricks here.
He's taking a story that was published in a shitty right-wing blog that never gets any stories right, like True Pundit, and pretending it's a story in an outlet that has editors and operates by some standards, like Rolling Stone.
This is just a story on True Pundit, and like most of the shit on that site, it can just be ignored.
But, this story is actually really interesting.
If you read the article, it says that Schiff was dressed in ancient Egyptian garb, and the FBI is probing him as part of his routine presence at Ed Buck's meth parties.
Since the story is being reported, you might expect a law enforcement source.
You might expect someone with the FBI giving a comment.
You might expect a supporting story out of literally any media, maybe a local news outlet.
Beyond the sourcing problems here, this article is just horribly written.
Given that Schiff was said to be dressed like an Egyptian, the article literally says, quote, we can make a leap here that partygoers were likely worshipping pyramids of meth.
This is a perfect demonstration of something Alex does a lot.
One of his associates, often someone like Larry or John Rappaport, will go and they'll lie to another media outlet that has zero journalistic standards.
That outlet will publish Alex's friend's claims with sensational headlines and no scrutiny.
Then Alex gets to turn around and report this as if it's solid objective reporting that is completely independent from him.
It's an interconnected web of liars, but it's very interesting to see Larry Nichols getting back into the game.
I haven't seen hide nor hair of him on Alex's show since September 21st, 2017, when he threatened to blackmail Congress on air.
But it would make sense for him to start getting more active now.
Clearly, Alex, and he's not alone in this, is trying to create the narrative that Hillary is secretly running in 2020, and if you need someone to smear people in Clinton's orbit...
There are a whole lot of very legitimate critiques that you can make about Clinton's work in Haiti.
And it would be nice if Alex were interested in any of those.
But he's not.
Most of them are difficult to understand.
And he likes to keep those sorts of issues to a minimum.
It's just so much easier to yell about dumb conspiracy theories about elites kidnapping children to drink their blood.
Way less work goes into that.
What Alex is talking about with that Clintons in Haiti case, it was a case involving an organization named New Life Children's Refuge, and specifically the group's founder, Laura Silsby.
On January 12, 2010, there was a gigantic earthquake in Haiti.
At least 100,000 people died as a result of the quake, and the number is suggested actually to be much higher than that.
Silsby was arrested, attempting to cross the border between Haiti and the Dominican Republic with 33 children, many of them who were not orphans, though they were heading for a makeshift orphanage.
She was arrested along with nine other missionaries she was working with, but charges against them all were dropped.
Only she remained in prison, though when she received a trial, the charges were dropped from kidnapping to, quote, arranging irregular travel.
She was found guilty and released, having served her sentence already while awaiting trial.
This story is an offshoot Pizzagate narrative.
When that whole thing was getting going, it was decided by internet sleuths that this is how the Clintons got kids that they would then use to harvest adrenochrome and their blood-drinking rituals in the non-existent basement of Comet Ping-Pong Pizza.
So he teases it again, and you kind of get a sense of what could be the delay.
He says that Roger said to make this announcement after the verdict.
So that could be why you push back.
But Alex does not wait.
He doesn't wait until after the verdict, because when he comes back, this is about three and a half hours into the show, he just goes ahead and makes the announcement.
And that message is, your basic liberties, your basic freedoms, and due process is under attack.
And if Roger Stone can be found guilty on any of the six counts against him by this kangaroo court and this Obama-appointed tyrant, So now, what you have there is editorializing.
And he said to me, Alex, barring a miracle, I appeal to God and I appeal to your listeners for prayer and I appeal to the president to pardon me because to do so would be a action that would show these corrupt courts That they're not going to get away with persecuting
people for their free speech or for the crime of getting the president elected.
If we don't do that, it will embolden their criminal activity.
Now, there is a press release and an article on newswars.com and infowars.com that has the number to the White House on it.
And even when he is convicted by this jury, it is vital that everyone share the information graphic posted.
At InfoWars.com and NewsWars.com with everyone you know on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, by hand, you name it, and that everyone who can in the area of Virginia or Maryland or West Virginia or all over the country travel to D.C. any time for the week after this conviction and encircle the White House with bullhorns demanding President Trump take action.
This is the tyranny, and this is a warm-up for President Trump, and President Trump hasn't gotten Assange out of jail.
He could, when he told Assange to release the WikiLeaks.
That's a big black mark on the president.
And if he doesn't, pardon Roger Stone.
Well then, I mean, I gotta tell you, no matter how many good things Trump does, doing this to Assange and letting Stone hang out to dry, if he does this, I just don't know what I'm gonna do.
We need to call the White House right now.
202-4...
5-6-1-4-1-4 and tell President Trump to pardon him.
Don't let him get their hands on him.
They'll put him in solitary confinement.
God knows he'll do to his food.
These people mean business and they mean to kill him.
put tom delay in jail till he got it out on appeal it's so funny to remember that alex's big documentary endgame literally ends with a shot of alex bullhorning rick perry's house late at night accusing him of being a globalist stooge and all they did was uh try and get him arrested for something they made up his main documentary that he says proves all of his claims leaves the viewer with a shot of him attacking rick perry but now This dude's so spineless.
This is what we talked about on a recent 2013 episode where Rick Perry was trying to force a Democrat DA out of office by defunding her office if she refused to resign, which is not cool.
He was indicted for that, but the charges were dropped after he appealed when he was out of office himself.
I don't know what it's like to have a kid, but that moment I imagine of you having told this child over and over and over again the same thing and them never learning and then eventually them coming up to you and being like, you know, I realize that this guy really doesn't like me and isn't paying attention to me.
And thinking that that's something that they're coming to on their own when you're like, I've been screaming that at you for four years, you idiot!
One, if that retelling of events is true, which I'm almost certain it's not, then if I were Trump, I wouldn't talk to Alex again either.
That retelling is clearly an instance of Alex lying to the president in order to get a racist authoritarian pardon for crimes he was absolutely guilty of.
Two, the documents Alex had were from Dennis Montgomery.
We did an entire episode about that bullshit titled The Dennis Montgomery Investigation.
You can go and listen to that if you want to understand it fully.
None of these documents were real, none of them proved Trump was being spied on, and none of them were from the DEA.
Why would the Drug Enforcement Agency be involved in any of this?
That should be a good dead giveaway that Alex is just kind of making shit up.
Three, the reason that Arpaio was going to prison was contempt of court.
That is true, but that doesn't really get to the heart of the matter.
Arpaio had been the subject of a very thorough investigation, and it was found that his police department in Maricopa County operated in ways that violated citizens'rights.
His department had a flagrant pattern of racial profiling that, quote, reached the highest levels of the agency.
And it was so severe that the department was stripped of its ability to legally identify and detain suspected undocumented immigrants.
Due to many lawsuits involving his inhuman treatment of detainees, the court told Arpaio that changes had to be made to his department.
Arpaio refused to do what the court said he had to do.
He was given many warnings.
Then in January 2015, years after he had every reason to understand that the way he did business violated civil rights, he was held in contempt of court.
The case went on until July 2017, at which point he was found guilty of criminal contempt.
But that charge is not just some minor charge.
That guilty charge is the front-facing mask that's covering up years of racist and abusive police practices that Arpaio refused to change.
I know it goes without saying, but the contempt of court charge means nothing to Alex.
The reason Arpaio got a pardon from Trump, the reason that Alex fought so hard to protect him, was the racist, abusive policing that characterized his career.
When they defend Arpaio, that's what they're defending.
Not some kind of bullshit, a judge can't send you to jail nonsense.
You don't need a jury to hold someone in contempt of court, because a jury already decided the case that contempt is based on.
Alex knows this.
He just doesn't care because he needs to make his white identity beliefs look like a defensive rule of law in order to make it marketable to a larger audience.
That's all that's going on here.
So fuck this.
Fuck this nonsense.
Another bad example for him to tie to Roger.
So now we get to the point where Alex announces Roger has been convicted.
And I thought, when they convict Stone today, probably when I'm on air, I'm going to wear that 1776 hat.
And right before I went live, I said, hey, I left it in my bathroom.
You'll get my 1776 hat.
And right as they walked in and handed it to me, they go, Roger Stone convicted.
Now, that's not some psychic event.
That's like watching somebody in a bullfight get run over by the bull and the bull's horn go right through the matador's heart and blood spray everywhere.
It regrows mitochondria in the brain cells that nothing else can do.
So your damaged brain cells, 50% of people have massive damage in the mitochondria and the brain cells.
I mean, Alzheimer's, everything.
They will not tell you about this, though.
And it's all here.
So 50% off.
It's the one thing everybody should give themselves.
Anybody above 40 should be on it.
But young people should take it as well because it has the PQQ, the CoQ10, and then it's got all of the other things known as the fountain of youth by the Japanese, the reishi mushroom.
Yeah, that was three minutes of his show he dedicated to talking about this DNA force in an infomercial way in the time when he would be most likely to have the most eyes on his show.
If I were looking at this cynically, I would say that's an intentional decision.
unidentified
No.
laughter laughter He just got the news that Roger's going to prison.
Right, but it's interesting because the misconception, I suppose, around that, and granted, I haven't looked into the dynamics of this year's march, but as it related to Stefan, he was going to whitewash that because the year prior...
There had been a bunch of people with Nazi signs and what have you.
And that was outlawed.
So he went to the sanitized version in order to create the appearance that all the reporting about the year prior's march was all bullshit and the left being out of control.
I don't know what this year's was.
I don't know what Paul's doing there.
If he wants to just go to a Polish Independence Day parade, I don't care.
But I do see it as signaling.
Because of Stefan going and making a big deal of endorsing white nationalism after going to Poland, it has become a bit of a thing in this community.
So what's going on here is that the way that Alex behaved on the November 14th show could be argued to indicate that Roger had broken his gag order through Alex.
So that is what the prosecution was saying in terms of holding him right after the verdict, which the judge didn't decide to go along with, but did continue his gag order until sentencing, which makes sense.
But what I find amazing about that is that this lawyer is contacting Alex, apparently, who knows if he's making this up.
I don't know if he's making it up because the phrasing of it is so, like, what someone would say.
But the guy is telling him, be careful about what you say about private communications.
And then Alex is repeating this private communication.
And the fun thing about that, though, is that this is him not being able to understand in real time.
Like, that's really interesting.
If that is genuine...
Then he's even turning a genuine, ostensible ally's words into the conspiracy theory reality, as opposed to Roger Stone's lawyer being like, hey, be nice to your friend.
The other thing I'm reading, Alex, is that normally people would get about six months prison time for this, but Roger Stone faces up to 50 years, which is basically a death sentence.
Paul Joseph Watson just came back from Europe where the awakening is accelerating, and I predict this attempt to intimidate the American people will backfire.
We'll see what this country's made of.
As for me, full speed ahead, no surrender, victory or death.
So the most serious charge that Roger was convicted of is witness tampering, which is the result of him trying to threaten and intimidate Randy Credico into pleading the fifth.
Generally speaking, people don't tamper with witnesses unless they know they're guilty and looking for a way to subvert justice.
It is true that sometimes people only get six months in prison for witness tampering.
That's fair.
A lot of it has to do with the context of the underlying crime.
For instance, Ted Clout was a GOP member of the South Dakota House of Representatives.
In 2007, he was arrested for sexually abusing his foster daughters, among other charges.
He ended up getting a pretty steep sentence, but in addition, he got 10 years added for attempting to tamper with witness testimony.
That's a super serious offense, so tampering with witnesses in that case is a huge deal.
In contrast, there was a case in 2015 where a husband and wife got a six-month sentence for witness tampering, but it was surrounding a drug arrest.
Whereas the tampering was still serious and needs a consequence, it was not nearly as serious as a former state representative abusing foster children.
So the court deals with the witness tampering Roger's case falls on the more serious side, seeing he was trying to subvert a federal investigation.
Alex can make all the arguments he wants about how Roger did nothing wrong and all that, but if that really were the case, I don't think he would be trying so hard to get Credico to stay silent.
Roger did that for a reason, and the only plausible explanation that comes to mind is that he felt that Randy Credico talking would be bad for him.
So, I don't know.
The six-month thing, yeah, I mean, it's technically fair, but that is also just, it's intentionally obtuse about the way these charges are added.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So, whatever.
And that's the most serious one.
That's the one that carries a possibility of 20 years, as I understand.
Yeah, and I think that this is indicating, like, that behavior also runs in line with me thinking that he's becoming aware that he has a big audience right now.
And a lot of folks that are supporters of Trump, and you're in the arena, you're out there, but you're not in the arena like I am.
Or Matt Drudge is.
Or others.
Who I guarantee you have been harassed.
I don't even need to talk to Drudge to tell you they've harassed the hell out of him and everybody else.
And Trump doesn't do anything about it.
Well, he has all the damn power and is in the right to do it.
And so here's the deal.
I love Trump a lot, but it's like, my back's broken, I'm being eaten alive in a pit, I can't get out, and Trump's up there at the top of the pit, not getting me out.
And we bring up such huge news here all the time that it all just kind of gets lost in its intensity.
It's like a log jam got broken up and just thousands of huge stories are coming down the pike here.
Used to, 20 years ago, we'd take one story and dissect it for months.
I mean, now it's hundreds of stories a day.
The story that's confirmed of what went on in court today should terrify everyone in America and the world that if we don't get control of our government and our judiciary and our legislative very quickly, we are going the way that all other nations go when they end up declining and falling.
I think what he's trying to do is capitalize on all the larger number of viewers here by increasing his ads and all of that shit, when that's not really going to do it.
What he should be doing is taking this time, now that all these people are watching again, to really fucking hammer, like, crush this shit.
Give the best free Roger Stone performance that anyone has ever given.
Because of the terrible Roger Stone political prisoner conviction of all seven counts facing 50 years in jail at the hands of the Obama hanging judge who let Hillary Clinton off the hook for Benghazi and the clear stand down of the deaths that happened there.
She railroaded Manafort and others, but Manafort had actually done some of the things that the claims and Obamas do with the offshore accounts, which you could argue were illegal.
Still, he was targeted for political reasons.
Stone did nothing wrong.
DrudgeReport.com is top-linked to our story and our live feed where we're breaking all of this down.
So, while it is true that Amy Berman Jackson, the judge in Rogers' trial, was also the judge in the case of Paul Manafort, that is true, but that doesn't necessarily mean anything nefarious is up.
There are only 15 judges in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, and it's entirely possible that this was a coincidence of timing.
Alex would need to do better than just to say Obama appointed her to prove any kind of concrete conspiracy here.
That's a pretty serious accusation to make about a judge.
If you look up Judge Jackson's history, Alex's picture of a leftist judge towing the liberal line just doesn't really seem to square with reality.
For instance, she presided over the sentencing of Jesse Jackson Jr., who was a Democrat member of the House and the son of Jesse Jackson, when he stole about $750,000 of campaign money.
You'd think if she was a damn hatchet person, she would have thrown out his sentence, but instead she put him in jail.
As it relates to Hillary Clinton, she didn't do anything crazy in terms of Benghazi.
All she did is dismiss a wrongful death suit against Hillary because it would have been illegal for it to continue based on the Westfall Act.
The Westfall Act is a 1988 law that made it so the United States itself is to be substituted as a defendant in cases where a government employee is sued for something that was the result of something that they did in their official capacity in their job.
This act explains a lot of questions why government officials and figures aren't being constantly sued.
It's because they have a form of immunity in terms of their official business.
Alex can say that this judge was protecting Hillary, but to do anything other than what she did, Judge Jackson would have violated a Supreme Court ruling and a law passed by Congress.
It would have been very illegal for her to allow that lawsuit to continue.
Now, interestingly, in looking into Judge Jackson, I found a website that I have become fascinated with and I might have spent way too much time on.
Even in the conservative community, there are people who would say that Snowden was absolutely a traitor, and there are plenty who would say he was absolutely a patriot.
Anyway, point is, Alex needs to do better than this if he wants to smear a judge just because he's going to send his friend to prison.
She had no legal reason to not dismiss the case against Hillary, and it's entirely possible it's a coincidence that she got both Roger and Manafort's cases.
There are clear counterexamples in her judicial history, like that of Jesse Jackson Jr., that tend to hurt the theory that she's a biased, set-up kind of judge.
You can really tell, though, he knows that more people are listening now.
He's trying to sound real smart and focused, and I think it's cute.
And I talked to some other journalists that are scared to come on about what was said this morning in the trial when they tried to put Roger in prison until the February 6th sentencing that the judge has done and what happened there and what was said about Roger.
And myself and you, the listeners of this show.
It's about you.
And I'm not building up the suspense of it.
I'm getting some documents, doing some research, collating those.
And I'm going to write a statement during the next break so that I get this precisely the way it is because they want to arrest me and they're saying it in the court.
You've seen them in the news last week trying to get me arrested and lying about me.
To my knowledge, Larry Nichols has not been on Alex's show in over two years.
I can't say with absolute certainty, but I know that I haven't heard him on the show since September 21st, 2017.
Which I remember very well, because that was the day Larry threatened to blackmail Congress and Mueller if they didn't stop investigating Trump, which is a big old crime.
There's something going on here, and I think it's something that I've been sensing for a while now.
When Joel Skousen started making increasing appearances on the show, I thought it was possibly an indication of Alex shifting things a little bit in his show.
Skousen had made it very clear that he doesn't think much of Trump, and actually called him an idiot many times on Alex's show.
After the 2016 election, when Alex was at the high point of his Trump infatuation, this led to them not seeing eye to eye, and he really wasn't around too much as a trusted source.
But he's coming back on the show now, which is interesting, more regularly.
Then, on November 14th, I'm sorry, on the 13th, Alex had Steve Pachanek back on the show, after him being gone for over a year.
And now, here we have Larry Nichols, brought back from the dead, after a very long absence.
I think these three reappearing are very interesting, and I'll tell you why.
Alex lost a lot more experts than just these three when he went full Trump.
Webster Tarpley hates Trump, and he would never talk to Alex again at this point.
Wayne Madsen hates Trump, and now views Alex as some kind of a shill, most likely for Israel.
These were dudes that Alex built narratives on.
Webster Tarpley was like one-third of the Obama deception documentary.
These were central figures in the Info War.
Skousen, Steve, and Larry were important too, but they're guys that Alex has who don't hate him for what he's become.
Steve and Larry are into Trump, but obviously for their own reasons.
Steve wants to install a dictator, and Larry just hates the Clintons.
Skousen doesn't like Trump, but he still respects Alex because of their shared insane anti-communism.
These are the three experts from days past who Alex could credibly bring back into his roster while transitioning away from Trump successfully.
In that period, Skousen could be presented as an expert who was regrettably right all along, that Trump embodied a great promise for them but wasn't competent enough to follow through.
Steve can make up stories about how Trump could have saved everyone, but the counter-coup was just too strong.
Larry can connect any stories about any Democrat to the Clintons and whisper ominously about witches.
I accept that I'm probably way overthinking this, but from where I'm sitting, the timing of this stuff seems very suspicious.
Skousen's been reintegrating, and then on the day of the impeachment inquiry starting the hearings, Steve is back.
And now the day Roger is found guilty, Larry is back.
It could all be a coincidence.
I'm totally fine that that is a very fine possibility.
But these dudes were regulars on the show for years, and just a few years back.
They were the people who were replaced by the Gavin McGinnises and the Mike Cernovich crowd.
For them to be making a resurgence feels like it means something.
But I want to stress that I could just be drawing conclusions that aren't necessarily there.
Another reason that I think this maybe might not mean anything too big is that Alex is in the middle of trying to pretend that Hillary is secretly running in 2020.
So why wouldn't he call Larry Nichols?
He's trying to run an imaginary anti-Hillary campaign, but he doesn't have Roger this time.
So it makes sense that he would resort to whatever he remembers from last time.
Thus, the Pizzagate narrative is coming back and Larry Nichols' dumbass showing back up, too.
It makes some sense, but it does also fit a pattern of what you would do if you were trying to save what you could.
Yeah, I agree with you, and it's difficult to tell how much of it is some sort of a plan like that, but it feels like, I mean, we're hearing these indications of Alex being like, Trump doesn't, he's not going to protect us, and he's not going to pardon Roger, I don't know what I'm going to do.
You have simultaneously the recurrence of these people who are, The people from his past that have drifted for various reasons that he could reintegrate and work with.
The problem with that is I don't see any way that it...
Because if you're going to stop, if you're no longer carrying water for Trump, and if you're no longer defending all of the shit he says, Then you've only got the anti-Hillary stuff, and there's really nothing there.
So all you've really got left from is just calling for more out-and-out violence.
And Skousen, Larry, and Steve are great tools to have for him in terms of furthering that goal, getting back to what works, as opposed to sycophantically...
And hey, I'll probably get destroyed in the process here in the next few years.
Maybe even sooner.
But you know what?
That's what men do.
They stand up.
Because the example...
They make out of me they think it's going to intimidate you.
I think it's going to inspire you to not go along with these people and to take our government back legally and lawfully.
And we're in the process of it now.
But the missing link in all this is the Justice Department and Trump.
Because the government's so full of these people that are arrogant and entitled and insolent that they really believe I should be in a jail cell because that witch war criminal Hillary didn't get in.
We're going to go to Larry Nichols.
I apologize for getting him on late.
Huge breaking things this segment and the next.
Also, we'll have him back soon so we can really get into all this.
Please remember, we're Lister Supported.
The big thing they try to take away is money to fund ourselves.
So what Alex is talking about there in that clip, and it's basically just the big news that he had to deliver that he keeps teasing, is that he thinks that the court wants him arrested.
This is neither true nor is it big news.
I was trying to find a clip to cut of him talking about this, but honestly, the delivery of it when he gets around to it is so rambling and incoherent that I felt like we could just talk about it.
On his show on the 14th, Alex purported to have that message from Roger.
That message was largely that he felt like he was going to be found guilty and he wanted Alex's audience to pray for him and for Trump to pardon him.
This was unfortunately wrapped in messages from Alex that if Roger got found guilty, everyone needed to go surround the White House and bullhorn them, and that it was the end of freedom and all those other things that got caught up in it.
Is that they talked about in court that Alex might have been responsible for breaking the gag order.
So, ultimately, you know, holding Roger after the sentencing, I think that might have been, or after the verdict, that might have been a bit excessive, but that's not what they did.
I think that the fact that they retained the gag order is something that is very responsible to do.
So, while under the gag order, Roger posted an image of Judge Jackson with, like, a crosshair on it.
Alex has a habit of targeting people for harassment, and that behavior has been particularly bad lately.
With his two botched attempts at guessing Roger's potential juror names, particularly notable.
Plus, the case Roger was being tried for involved witness tampering and intimidation.
Putting him under a gag order is like suspending someone's driver's license when they're awaiting trial for a DWI.
He's shown that he can't be trusted to behave responsibly.
More importantly, you can hear with Alex this frustration that's growing with Trump.
He and his buddies are out here on the front lines and either doing everything they can, but Trump refuses to act or support them.
Alex is teased turning on Trump so many times that I can't really even trust anything he's saying.
But I think that his petty feelings about being abandoned are the most plausible thing that will cause Alex to jump shit.
...is that it turns out that Adam Schiff, folks, wrote the script.
This whole script they're going through now, it's a subpoena trap.
He did it back when they figured out that the Mueller case was going to end up going nowhere, which was about halfway through the Mueller investigation.
Now, I didn't know this until the host I was doing researched it, but as it turns out...
And then, I don't know if you can make more sense of this than I can, but Larry literally says in the middle of this clip, Adam Schiff went to these parties at Buck's house dressed like an Egyptian because he's a screenwriter.
The answer is going after the ringleader's crimes and exposing them and that's what Larry Nichols is doing with its confirmed mainstream news that Adam Schiff leading the fake impeachment.
His good buddies with Buck is there at least 16 times at bizarre sex parties where they did ritualistic mock human sacrifice.
And that's in some of the diaries of some of the victims that died, at least three black men.
Some of them crawling, begging as he would plunge needles filled with methamphetamine into them as a form of sacrifice, reportedly.
Larry Nichols, getting back to what you were saying, longer segment coming up.
In the short one, please continue with the hobby of Adam Schiff and what your sources are saying.
Nothing I'm saying or any takes on this story that I have should imply that I have any interest in defending Ed Buck.
I hope his case is thoroughly investigated and he's punished to the full extent of the law.
I think it's good for people to talk about that case as long as they stay grounded in reality.
However, I don't think that's what Larry is doing.
Larry's been pushing this Adam Schiff narrative since at least October 11th, when he made a startling allegation on the YouTube show Crowdsource the Truth.
It's pretty complicated to describe what that show is, but I think it might be fair to say it's a bargain bin Infowars, where Alex's guests go when Alex is too busy.
Like, when you get kicked off Twitter, you go to Gab, it's kind of the same thing when a guest is no longer welcome on Infowars, but still has an itch to lie to people.
They end up going to crowdsource the truth.
Jerome Corsi and Larry Nichols are two of the show's regular guests currently.
The host, Jason Goodman, has also welcomed to his show some of the more unsavory characters who've popped up on Alex's show over the years.
There's Robert David Steele, the guy who told Alex that globalists are taking kidnapped children to Mars bases.
I do think the two of them have had a falling out, though.
There's Larry Klayman, who recently sued Alex, along with Jerome Corsi.
There's Jack Posobiec.
There's also a weird Project Camelot overlap, in which Jason has had Carrie Cassidy on at least once, as well as her big false flag expert, Ole Damogard, who's someone who we haven't covered because those episodes are not Project Camelot fun.
But he's on Project Camelot a lot to talk about false flags.
Along with...
Jim Fetzer, sometimes.
The guy who wrote the book, No One Died at Sandy Hook.
I hate so much that if Adam Schiff, and I don't even care if it's true or not, but Adam Schiff likes to write screenplays in his off time, and that's evidence that he's some sort of evil whatever it is.
But Carrie Cassidy tried to write screenplays, but...
She's the only one who's exposing the real truth now.
So hilariously, the thumbnail image on one of the videos of this crowdsource the truth that was interviewing Ole Damogard is just the Illuminati card game cards.
Honestly, I've considered covering that show as a Wacky Wednesday option, but every time I've tried, I just find the host so boring and the content very unengaging.
With Larry coming back into Alex's life, I might have to reconsider, but I probably won't.
Jason Goodman himself has been at least featured on David Knight's show, but I'm not sure he's ever made it to the rarefied air of being on with Alex.
He also sometimes talks to people who Alex doesn't ignore, like Mike Adams and Owen Schroyer.
Also, Jason Goodman was one of the journalists who attended Alex's weird press conference back in April of last year.
It's a show that traffics in all the real dumb, cool conspiracy theories like Pizzagate, Seth Rich, the Las Vegas shooting.
He's even down with the dumb Dennis Montgomery bullshit.
My point here is that this is basically a junior varsity Infowars, and it's not a good show.
That's where Larry Nichols started putting this information out, after which point it gets repeated ad nauseum in the fringe right-wing media.
It's really easy to get this narrative cooking.
Larry's a lunatic who has a 20-something year record of making shit up for attention and money, but he can just go on a dumb YouTube conspiracy show, say some stupid shit, then sites like True Pundit will re-report it, while breathlessly calling Larry a consummate Washington insider and Clinton confidant.
True Pundit posts articles with headlines like, quote, Clinton whistleblower, feds investigating Adam Schiff's disturbing behavior at Ed Buck's meth sex house.
With no confirmation or evidence other than Larry saying it.
Then, sites with real smart-sounding names like Global Intel Hub get to re-report on the story, linking to the True Pundit story saying, quote, officially Schiff is under investigation.
This story gets at the added flair of credibility because there are pictures of Schiff and Buck at events together because Buck was a huge political donor.
And because of that, of course Buck's crime deserves particular attention.
I don't disagree with that.
And Schiff or any other politician, if they turn a blind eye to Buck's actions because of financial support, then they should be held to account for that.
But the simple fact of Buck donating to Schiff or Schiff being seen with Buck at a public event, that doesn't prove anything on its own.
What Larry and Alex are doing is completely unacceptable because they don't care about Buck's crimes except how they can be used to further their political ends.
And I find that shitty.
If any of this stuff can ever be proven in any way, I'm fine changing my position.
But for now, I have a standing position of not believing a damn thing Larry Nichols says, unless it can be confirmed by someone who isn't a career liar.
He's remembered the narrative he was supposed to push, and that is that now they're trying to get these prosecutors in in rural areas in order to tamp down rural dissent.
I'm going to say that Larry thinks that there's no way Hillary's going to run.
What she's trying to do is orchestrate the actual candidate, and then when the candidate wins election, she will kill the candidate and assume the role of president.
She needs to be the head of it, and she plans to be the head of it.
So I will not be surprised at all if she's not in that race in a month.
Now, we don't have time today, but as I've done in the past, if you have me on again, I'll be glad to tell everybody exactly what they're doing and what they're doing next.
And you know, Alex, we had a hell of a good track record.
Let's flash back to when Larry was saying that Obama was going to run again in 2016 and then declare himself a Muslim and turn America into a Muslim country so he would be the king of global Islam.
You remember when Larry was saying that they were going to launch a FEMA provisional government in a state of emergency because when the Clintons do that, If they're in charge, they become king.
If you're the president, when that goes into effect, you become king.
And there are no senators or congress members who are coming out and telling you the truth because when that shit goes down, they become dukes.
So, like, when he says she sees that it's going down, that's what he's talking about, is, like, whatever government where we get kings and dukes is about to start, and she better be in charge of that.
And so I can say it, but he did have people reach out to him from the system to turn against Trump.
They'd leave him alone.
And, of course, he didn't do it.
And so he got a SWAT team raid.
And I've had the same stuff as well.
And, you know, they're off-record discussions.
And I've had to sign nondisclosures and things like that.
And I want to be able to meet with these criminals occasionally so I don't ever break those deals because that's not criminal to meet with the criminals.
But, you know, I've had meetings with these mafia people's representatives.
And they're basically like, hey man, we're going to kill you.
And I'm like, well, just go ahead.
Because you're going to get it after that politically.
That's what this is all about.
If I need to go down at the Alamo jackasses, I will.
You understand?
Just remember, you're going to get it.
You see how you're already getting your ass handed to you?
You already see how long you're losing it?
I'll be just like Gandhi when you take that club and split my head.
And he would talk about it specifically more, but he agreed to confidentiality surrounding this.
And he doesn't want to break that confidentiality because he still likes to take meetings with these globalists so they can threaten to kill him and he can yell at them.
unidentified
And he doesn't want to jeopardize that because that's good fun.
It doesn't seem weird to me because the level of incompetence is established at such a high level that it's like, man, they just don't know how to change the track.
Anything corrupt or evil that I was ever into now is a joke and I'm pulling away by light years away from the devil.
Accelerating away.
Satan's behind me.
And I just want to take my children and your children and all these wonderful spirits that are good, gentle creatures with us into the universe forever and justice and freedom and away from these fallen, twisted entities.
I'm really tempted, but I need to spend some time with the family.
I've got a lot of big projects.
I'm up here working tomorrow already on projects and plans and big things to fight the globalists.
And I'm excited about all this.
I'm getting ready to sell my house so I can fund these projects, which I'm glad to do.
That's what that energy is stored up to do.
But I want money because it's a weapon system and it's because I can block these enemies' attacks with it and then I can carry out operations against them.
So, for a long time, Alex has said that if he has to, he's willing to sell his house to fund the Infowar.
But this is literally the first time I've heard him talk about it as something he's actually doing.
I don't know if I believe him, because Alex is a liar, and it's in the middle of him doing an ad pivot, so it's possibly, pretty likely, that that's just him trying to create more incentive for people to give him money.
But assuming that that's not a lie, this is a very, very bad sign for Alex.
There's no way that selling his house could provide enough capital for him to run Infowars for very long, so this would just be a matter of him trying to buy a few months at best.
The reason I say that is because Alex has made it clear that it costs tens of millions of dollars to run Infowars each year.
It's a complicated business, with a gigantic studio where rent is not low, tons of bandwidth costs, an entire supplement business with a warehouse and distribution connected, a bunch of lawyers working on a ton of cases.
I don't know if tens of millions, that figure, is correct, but I feel like it could be close, given how many moving parts Infowars has.
The most expensive home sale ever in Austin was a gigantic mansion that went for $21.8 million, and currently the most expensive house on the market has an asking price of $14.9 million.
Alex obviously has a nice house, and I bet it's worth a lot, but it's nowhere near the top end of Austin's luxury property market.
If I had to guess, I would be surprised if his house was valued at more than a few million dollars.
Alex has said that his family owns some land.
But I have a hard time imagining that his parents, who are still alive, would allow him to sell off acreage that's been handed down generationally just so he can keep paying the legal fees that his radio show has racked up.
Plus, I think if that's what he was saying, he might phrase it differently.
Ultimately, I don't know what to think here.
If he's saying that he's selling his house when he's not, and it's just a crass and manipulative marketing ploy, I think that's possible.
If he's actually selling his house, then his show is not going to make it another six months.
It's not like Alex is just in a tough patch and he needs to get through it and then everything will be fine.
He's fucked in the long run, whether he makes it through this crunch or not.
His reach is non-existent.
His best friend, who he changed his career for, is going to prison.
He's crawling back to Larry Nichols and Steve Pchenik.
His attempts to dodge the Sandy Hook lawsuit are all failing.
The president he's made the center of his career is getting impeached.
Those aren't little obstacles in the road.
There are major problems that $6 million is probably not going to solve.
Again, I still think he's probably full of shit.
But if he's not, he's in serious trouble.
And I would probably advise him against selling his house.
Scaling back and seeing if you could regrow a little bit somehow.
I think that's probably his only real ploy.
Dumping money into Infowars at this point, short of finding an angel investor who will give you millions of dollars, millions and millions of dollars, to keep doing what you're doing is a fool's game.
So Alex, at this point...
It starts to speculate about Trump.
So when I was talking about this stuff and Alex bringing these guys back in seems indicative of a move away from Trump, it was a feeling that I was having.
And when I got to this point in the episode, I really feel like maybe it's more than just my feelings.
And I'm going to take a few calls now, but I'm going to briefly, at the start of the next segment, have a message for President Trump, because I know what Trump's doing, I know what he's being told, and I know the calculus.
What's going on in his brain about Roger Stone?
And this is a lot bigger than Roger Stone, obviously.
And that calculus is not good.
Roger Stone is not a fart in church that we just try to pretend didn't happen.
Trump needs to run towards this and pardon Stone and point out how it's all fiasco, just like the fake impeachment.
He had a press conference and we went and checked.
Reportedly, he didn't talk about Stone.
Just like he doesn't talk about Julian Assange anymore after he told Julian Assange to release the info.
And that's a lack of loyalty.
And it's not good.
You know, we've been right about everything we told Trump.
In Running Man, written by Stephen King, turned into a movie, the government can show one person that really killed somebody, but then put somebody else's face on it with computers.
In my mind, here's what he thinks is going to happen in court.
He's going to go to court, he's going to play that video, and then he's going to play the video that was superimposed on it, so you can see both of them playing side by side, and it'll prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that, of course, this one time-stamped from 30 years ago could not be the same video, and the jury will be like, nope, looks the same, guilty!
God says there's a time for everything, and we've been legal and lawful, and look what it's got us.
God put Trump in to give us a second chance.
Has he done good things?
Yes.
But he has allowed people like Roger Stone and WikiLeaks and everything else to go on for us to have our hands tied behind our backs while we think we're in a fight.
Well, we're losing.
And it's time to get hardcore and it's time to get extreme because we're losing our country.
I'm predicting Trump will be impeached because look what they've done.
They've silenced...
I've been banned from Facebook and Twitter multiple times.
Roger Stone has been convicted.
Everything is falling apart.
Trump has not stood up for the Internet censorship.
We cannot speak anymore.
We've lost our country.
As you've said today, we live in clown world.
Now is the time to make a stand, because if we don't, Alex, I'm afraid we're not going to have a country to come home to.
This is the part where it's really interesting, because I think that there is a dichotomy at play, and I don't know how Alex can possibly work with it.
And that is that there is this element of his audience.
They see Roger being convicted, and it's like, well, it's time to get our guns.
There is no hope.
Trump isn't going to do it.
Therefore, it's time to shoot.
And I don't know how you suppress that urge in your audience, Alex, because he's built it up over time.
Like, hey, Trump is our last hope.
If it doesn't work out, then we have to go to the gun.
Like, that sort of thing has been a mainstay of his rhetoric for a long time.
But simultaneously, you start to see, like, I don't think that that's what Alex is experiencing in his transition.
Because if he goes away from Trump, it's not necessarily, at least what I hear in this episode, I don't hear him being, like, calling for, since Trump didn't do it, we gotta fucking start a civil war.
I think that his His attempts to focus on Hillary, his attempts to sort of re-maneuver what he's doing, it could lend itself to more info war.
So you have that, and then you have this element of the audience.
I don't know what you can do with it, but it doesn't seem good.
And that's one of the things I think is most troubling about the possibility of Alex turning on Trump is it will radicalize further a certain segment of his audience.
And the direction that they're going to go is kind of expressed by this cop.
That is, I mean, it's very predictable, this going down, the way it has.
When you figure the...
Power structures in the right wing have always been attempting to co-opt the lower classes by distracting them with race and cultural issues and so on and so forth in order to do all this shit.
And by being able to channel that rage, they've been able to exist in a state of minority rule for fucking forever.
And now the rage is kind of getting out of their control and they don't know how to react to it because half of them are that rage.
You know, the power structure used to just be people controlling it.
And now half of them are just as crazy as everybody else.
And it's troubling to think what could happen as a consequence of Alex turning on Trump if he doesn't do it right.
And I honestly think that bringing back Steve and bringing back Larry and having Joel Skousen have a more prominent position in the show, if that is Alex trying to maneuver getting away from Trump, I think is incredibly responsible.
I guess the biggest problem I have is just the way that they had to portray it against Hillary with it being like our last hope and so on and so forth.
It's very much that.
Everybody gets disillusioned with the political process.
Everybody winds up thinking that politics is going to be able to do something and then it fails you in some way or another.
That's the system.
It's designed that way.
But whenever the guy that you have touted as the last guy turns out to disillusion you, why bother with the next election?
That's how disillusionment becomes despair, almost.
And despair in the hands of people who are, let's say, inclined towards militias and the worldview that is expressed by these anti-communist propagandists.
The legacy that includes the Turner Diaries and Siege and all of this.
We are on Facebook, and if you'd like to download the show, please go to iTunes or other podcastual apps and download it from there, and then tell your friends and so on.