Today, Dan and Jordan check in with Alex Jones in the present day and see how he's taking the news that Trump tweeted about a hypothetical civil war. How does Alex balance telling his audience that an actual civil war is inevitable with his calling his audience to "legal and lawful" action? Poorly, it turns out.
The more we keep putting up with it, like, they're the authorities and they're the bosses.
The worse it's going to get, because we're in this stalemate now where most people don't believe them and hate the establishment, but they're still in charge, except populists are getting elected everywhere, so now they're taking over elections, speeding up election fraud, speeding up intimidation, bullying, and we're on a collision course.
So I'm going to talk.
At the bottom of the hour, believe me, you want to be here, about how we defeat this and how we stop this, and I have a plan.
There's an article up on Infowars.com that deals with all of this, and we've proven we know how to take action, and you know how to take action and stop these globalists, but it's going to have to be in the streets.
We've got to hit the streets in a big, meaningful, aggressive way.
This is why they wanted us off air ahead of 2020, because they don't want us, as the modern Paul Revere's, to raise the alarm.
The president has said, we'll play the clips again, I played them at the start, you may have missed them, that we're in a war.
Who are we at war with, though?
And that these people are evil and want to overthrow the country, because Trump represents the people in our best interest.
Well, and also, I mean, Stefan Molyneux just put out a video where he's talking about how the deplatforming and stuff that he's experienced has led to a disruption of the inflow of people, and that's critically hurt his ability to make money on his hustle.
He theoretically started his career aspiring to do comedy, but he very quickly realized the power of right-wing media in terms of taking shortcuts to popularity.
And he played Classroom Boy in the 2007 fucked up David Duchovny movie The Secret, where David Duchovny's dead wife's soul takes over his daughter's body, and most of the film is sexual tension between a father and daughter.
But if you really take a look at how things were going for him, his career as an actor was dead on arrival.
If over the course of 12 years you aren't really able to get any juice, any momentum going, it's probably an indication that you weren't really cut out to act.
Stephen probably realized that that was the case because in 2009 he embarked on a new career, one of being a low-level functionary in the right-wing media.
He was an emcee at the CPAC in 2011, presumably because he was one of the only people they could find who had any kind of performance experience.
To give you a reminder that Trump is just part of the problem, here's a list of some of the speakers at CPAC 2011.
Crowder produced videos that would be aired on Fox News during this period, and a couple years later, he really made his mark with a particularly distasteful report that he filed.
In December 2012, Crowder was in attendance at a Michigan Right to Work rally, where he was on video mixing it up with a bunch of union protesters.
A lot of the window dressing for his reports and all this stuff is really unimportant, so I'm just going to cut to the chase.
Stephen ended up getting punched by one of the union guys, and immediately started parading the video around right-wing media, making appearances on Hannity, with his video becoming a fixture of Fox News in that news cycle.
This clearly demonstrated that union protesters are violent, painted them in a completely negative light, and in effect demonized the cause that they were out there protesting for.
Crowder challenged the union guy who punched him to a fight, and he was well on his way to becoming a new shining star in the right-wing media landscape.
And then it came out that the tape he'd been showing, which showed him being sucker punched out of nowhere by this union guy, was manipulatively edited.
The version that backs up Crowder's story specifically cuts out a part where someone knocks the union guy to the ground, and when he gets up, he hits Crowder, clearly acting in self-defense.
The guy had been attacked, and it's unclear by whom, because the camera isn't focused on the right spot, but the important thing is that this wasn't an unprovoked attack, as Crowder had been portraying it.
After this, Steven didn't need to take roles like Classroom Boy anymore, and he's been working the right-wing grift ever since.
He started his show Louder with Crowder in 2015, and since then, he's done his fake, edgy, comedy bullshit shtick quite successfully.
By making his content incredibly stupid, but also sophomorically offensive, he's able to Trojan horse conservative talking points into content that's super attractive to teens, which is really the place that he lives in in the marketplace of ideas.
It's the only reason he's a worthwhile commodity to the right and why he's part of Glenn Beck's network, The Blaze, now.
Over the years, his guests have run the gamut from shithead conservative types to dangerous radicals.
Noted overt anti-Semite Owen Benjamin used to be a regular on his show, but has since come out against him.
In his YouTube videos, sometimes Benjamin will take a break from blaming Jews for everything that happens in the world to accuse Crowder of being gay, possibly with his assistant, who goes by the name Not Gay Jared.
Uh...
That's kind of the level of humor we're talking about here.
So I went back through his podcast section on his website, and you might be surprised to find out that the second post in that section on his website is titled, quote, Moderate Islam is a Myth.
Dave Rubin, Lauren Southern, Ben Shapiro, Kurt Schilling, Tommy Robinson, Dinesh D'Souza, Stefan Molyneux, Blair White, and of course, Owen Benjamin.
This is a show that's tailored towards the youth, and the idea that you would have someone like Stefan Molyneux on a show whose demo is under 18, that should be a crime.
You're enabling a psychopath to prey on your audience, and it's not like...
All along the way that he was having these overt, over-the-top bad actors and liars on his show, he also had access to people who were supposed to be legitimate politicians who came on as guests.
People like Governor Mike Huckabee, Rand Paul, Dan Crenshaw, and Ted Cruz.
There's a reason that this brand of politician would still go on a program where the regular roster of guests is littered with extremists.
Among them, outright cult leaders, fascists, gang leaders, felons, and Holocaust deniers.
Steven Crowder is useful to them, and he has been since he lied about that union guy punching him.
Along the way, Crowder's made a name for himself by posting up on college campuses with signs making declarative statements like, there are only two genders, and insisting students change his mind.
He interestingly never really tried to pull off a stunt like this with adults, preferring to just befuddle unsuspecting undergrads who saw his table on the quad while killing time between classes.
Along with Dave Rubin, Crowder is famous for being the sort to yell, debate me, and we want to exchange ideas that everyone but mysteriously refuses to even talk to Sam Seder.
So, anyway, what Alex is talking about with this post Crowder recently made, that he's learned that they're blocking him and stuff.
There's a post, and there's screenshots that seem to imply that his channel is being shadow banned or some dumb shit.
He posted that if you search for him or someone else in league with him, YouTube doesn't show you any of their videos, just videos from other channels, and this is a conspiracy.
This is all explained by the fact that the search he was showing was filtered and had the video option selected.
There may be some other complaints that Crowder is raising, but I don't really care all that much.
His career has shown him to be an unreliable source for just about anything, and this "they're blocking my content" thing is such a constant and fraudulent refrain from these right-wing con men, so I don't really want to take too much time up trying to sort out, get to the bottom of any of this.
One thing that's important to point out is that Bob Dylan is a poet, and it's probably foolish to take a statement like this literally.
When it comes to Alex and his interpretation, another Dylan quote comes to mind.
Quote, Sometimes it's not enough to know what things mean.
Sometimes you have to know what things don't mean.
The comment that's why he's deep.
The comment Dylan was making is not him saying that he made a literal deal with the literal devil to get where he got in life.
There's a common metaphor that people use to describe having to make sacrifices and give up things in life in pursuit of your overriding greater goals.
The deal with the devil is that Bob Dylan got to become one of the most important songwriters possibly in American history.
But in exchange, he could never live a normal life.
For an artist, life is never really normal.
On the path to success, if there's to be success, their focus has to be so squarely on their craft that they don't often get to experience parts of life that everyone else does.
They can live in poverty, so they can dedicate tons of time to getting good at what they're called to do.
They keep completely different hours than people with normal jobs, essentially around everyone but apart.
And then, if they're lucky enough to succeed and become a famous musician, for example, their life will never be normal after that point.
From then on, they'll never really be sure if anyone in their life values them for themselves or for who they are in the world.
Social interactions become distorted, and whatever alienation they felt before as an impoverished, nocturnal performer is only elevated now that they've reached the goal that they were shooting for.
I don't know.
When I hear Bob Dylan say something like this, expressing that he doesn't stop performing or making music because he's keeping up with his end of the bargain, what I hear is him expressing that he made a deal with his own talent.
He committed to be this musician to the exclusion of so many other human comforts that he swore he would never stop creating, and he's not going to stop now just because he's old, rich, and famous.
This is embarrassing, satanic panic-level shit that Alex is doing.
He's basically saying that pretty much every famous person, every celebrity you may enjoy, someone who might appear to be doing good social work, none of that shit matters.
By definition, if they're successful, they made a deal with the devil.
He's just trying to paint everything that isn't involved with his version of right-wing extremism, even things that may seem benign, as intrinsically evil and a threat to his audience.
It's sad on one level, but it's also the sort of thing that doesn't seem like it has anywhere to go in the future other than violence.
Like, once you paint everyone who doesn't agree with your dumb bullshit as being literal Satan worshippers who want to take your kids and kill them and put you in a slave camp, how does that narrative play out?
Is there some point...
And, you know, I think Alex...
Probably has to be aware of that.
Once people are willing, Satan-worshipping child killers, are you going to negotiate with them?
Or I guess the literal devil is forcing Bob Dylan to keep making music because that was the condition of a deal they made to get the times they are a-changing on the radio.
But the reason I get into this a little more, where normally this might be something I just like, who gives a shit, is because this is a clear editorial decision.
No, I mean, let's not try and disentangle this because I think Occam's razor tells us that the easiest explanation for this is Alex is in a severe panic.
I know that if you as an audience do this, and if I go out as an example and do this as well, I know that we're going to turn things around, and I know we're going to absolutely put the Globals back on their heels and defeat them.
Speaking to a big crowd of people, I don't get butterflies.
You know, trying to pick up a hot chick when I wasn't married or whatever.
I don't get butterflies.
I'm about to get in a fight.
But when I see destiny, and when I know it's in my hands, and when I know that if we don't win, true evil is going to run absolutely rampant, and it's our responsibility to fight as hard as we can, and then God will take us the rest away.
When I know something's destiny, well, just like that, I started sweating about five minutes ago, as you can see if you're watching on television, because the responsibility of this is so powerful.
And it's almost like if I just come on air and say, here it is, I haven't done a good enough job.
I need to drumroll and build this up with some ceremony because people won't think it's important unless I do that.
I don't want to be teasing this reveal of what his suggestion is as if to imply that it is, like, let's go beat people up or something like that.
It's not like that, but you've got to understand why, if you're listening to this, you're a little bit like, uh-oh, this could be anything he's going to advocate his listeners do.
And then when he says something like this, it makes it even more like, what are you going to suggest?
You stand up like Martin Luther King or Muhammad Gandhi or Jesus Christ, the model of those men, could go into the money changers' own dens and who would expose the corruption of the system.
Time for Americans to hit the streets, counter the leftist coup by bringing truth to their events.
Our forebearers are willing to fight an empire that's never been defeated, the British, and win.
We don't have to physically fight.
We've just simply got to go to their events, get up there, Buy the microphone and then start getting key points out about the globalists and about their crimes and about how they're trying to crash the stock market and the Federal Reserve admits it and how they're trying to break our borders and how they're saying America was never great or how Hillary and her corrupt server or Uranium One and the Russians or Joe Biden and his son and the $4 billion gas company and the board of directors.
We've got all the points that we recommend you shout out at them or you can do your own.
All I'm saying is...
Take action.
They wanted us off the air because they fear you taking action.
But when he says there at the end, we've done it before, he's specifically talking about the Bill Clinton is a Rapist contest that he had, where he paid people to go yell at Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton events.
That he has to keep reiterating, don't commit crimes.
Because I know...
My audience, that's an assumption that I know that you guys want to commit crimes.
And unless I'm very hyper-specific about do this legally and lawfully, you might end up bombing the UN like you suggested his audience might want to do back in 2013.
So, the last half hour of Alex's Sunday show is just special reports.
He straight up just leaves.
He spent 90 minutes talking about how the Democrats are the devil and how people need to get into the streets to fight back, and I gotta say, I admire how he walks the walk.
I literally have no doubt that he left his show and got his ass out there and did some meaningful direct action.
Either that or he met with some lawyers about the millions of lawsuits he's mixed up in currently.
This didn't have big backing behind it, this movie.
According to the director, Jim Mickle, he wanted to have a theatrical release, but he couldn't find funding, since the movie would be too expensive for most indie studios and too weird for a big-budget outfit.
it.
unidentified
Also, the movie isn't quite being adored in the way that Alex seems to be pretending that it is.
On the surface, it would appear that Alex has no idea what he's talking about and he's just talking shit.
But if you know how Alex operates, it's pretty easy to see what's up here.
Alex is so averse to white people ever being portrayed as being even capable of terrorist acts that when a fictionalized white nationalist group does a bombing in a movie, he has to whitewash them as just good upstanding patriots trying to fight globalism.
The reality behind this is that Alex, deep down and probably not so deep down, knows that one of his first sponsors, Larry Pratt, was at the Rocky Mountain Rendezvous, along with Aryan Nations, the Klan, and tons of extremist militia figures.
He knows that most of his anti-communist heroes came out of the failed presidential campaign of segregationist George Wallace, which also spawned William Luther Pierce, the Turner Diaries, and the National Alliance.
He knows his heroes in the John Birch Society were fascists.
He knows that his primary source on Bilderberg worked for a publication that denied the Holocaust, which was run by neo-Nazi Willis Cardo.
Alex knows exactly where he comes from, and he knows damn well that he's going to stop making money if he gets on air and says that he's mad that this Netflix movie made white nationalist terrorists look bad.
That's what he wants to say, because he doesn't think they're bad.
But he can't, so he calls them patriots fighting globalism.
I resist calling this a Rosetta Stone, since Alex does that all the time, but I do think that if you understand this dynamic and what's going on here, it should lead you to question the broader application of his use of the word patriot.
I'll go ahead and leave that there as something for people to chew on as sort of a discussion question for the class, lest I get into a doctoral thesis about Alex's word games and how he hides his true intention behind facades.
So you've got this movie that is about someone traveling back in time in order to avert a terrorist bombing carried out by a white nationalist militia in order to provoke a civil war.
And Alex has turned this into a narrative about a movie about someone coming back to kill conservatives and patriots in order to stop them from fighting globally.
So Alex is saying that the, quote, production house that made In the Shadow of the Moon is a, quote, production house that's largely owned by the Chinese government.
Alex is just making this up, and I could tell you that without looking into it, since he said, quote, production house.
In reality, the movie was produced in partnership between three companies, 42, Automatic, and Nightshade.
42 is a privately held company, meaning the Chinese government does not own it.
It's based in London, and in a press release in Deadline announcing Netflix signing a first-look deal with 42, all the partners in the company are listed.
They are Ben Pugh, Rory Aitken, Kate Buckley, Kathy King, and Josh Varney.
Automatic is run by three guys who used to work at Creative Artist Agency who decided to do their own thing.
There's literally no indication that they're even pardoned by the Chinese government.
It seems like just a...
Production outfit.
Nightshade Studios is as close as Alex is going to get, but he's still way off.
I say that only because a part of their mission statement is to introduce independent movies into foreign markets, including those in Asia.
But there's literally no indication they're even partially owned by the Chinese government.
None of this matters.
Alex has zero idea who even produced this movie.
He doesn't know about 42, Automatic, or Nightshade.
It doesn't matter, because the reality is not important.
He's built up a narrative that the Chinese government owns Hollywood and they're using it to attack the noble patriots of America and that narrative has to move forward.
It's so crucial to protect the narrative that Alex is willing to take a movie about stopping white nationalist terrorist groups and make it into a movie about stopping patriots from fighting globalism and then lie about the production house that made the movie being mostly owned by the Chinese government in order to make it look like the Chinese government wants to make movies that are about killing patriots.
unidentified
Yeah, I can see why he had to leave for the last half hour of the show, man.
Let's talk about The Hunt, though, which is the most ridiculous thing for Alex to be complaining about.
That movie never got released because of right-wing backlash and a tweet from Trump decrying the movie, which, I should point out, he had not seen.
That's really fucked up on its own, but it's also probably not entirely accurate.
Some reports I've seen have claimed that it was actually all the mass shootings that kept happening that led to the movie being shelved, but it tends to get conflated with the right-wing backlash really easily.
I can't quite say for sure what caused it to not come out, but either way, the right-wingers definitely tried to get it not released.
And that's pathetic.
Because the movie is really just a retelling of the story, The Most Dangerous Game.
The middle Americans, called deplorables by their captors in the movie The Hunt, are kidnapped and hunted by evil liberal elites.
They're the heroes of the movie.
They're the people who you see the movie through, you experience their story, and the audience empathizes with them.
It's literally their story of survival that's being followed.
The film was produced by Blumhouse, the same studio company that made Jordan Peele's movie Get Out.
Peele has said that his intention when making Get Out was to confront white liberals with their own contradictions.
He told Variety, quote, It's a pretty fair assumption to think that the same studio that made that might be interested in producing a film like The Hunt,
where the audience is faced with the dehumanizing attitudes many liberals may hold towards rural people, middle Americans and conservatives, much like my friends had about Moose or L.A. Monte in younger days.
From literally everything I can tell, that's what this movie was about.
But because the right-wing media is so completely out of control, stupid, and sensitive, they refuse to even engage with satire that's meant to bring people together and encourages liberals to explore their unexamined biases.
Like, it's crazy to me, this complete disconnect with anything.
So, Alex, also, one of his chief things here, now that this impeachment thing didn't go away after a day, one of his things is preemptive damage control.
Because he needs to instill in his audience's mind that anything that happens...
Is a setup.
So any whistleblower that comes out and says something, that's a plan.
Anybody who accuses Trump of, let's say, sexual assault, that's all a plan.
He needs to inoculate them to the idea that there are going to be some fucked up things that end up coming out.
And say that when Trump says, you try this, it'll cause a civil war, that he's trying to invoke a civil war, trying to intimidate them.
When all Trump's doing is pointing out what's going to happen.
Now, when Trump means a civil war, he means a big, bloody, millions dead.
Because believe me, once the venerous civilization peels off, and once a shooting war starts, there's been a lot of Santa Clauses that have been making lists and checking it twice.
No one who's naughty and nice and all the meth-head devil worshippers and congresspeople and globalists, I mean.
He's essentially saying that he and a lot of his weirdo militia friends have made kill lists of their enemies that once things fall apart and it starts, there's going to be some targeted assassinations being carried out by his right-wing buddies.
So in this next clip, this is where I think really we get to see a pretty clear picture of why even if Alex Jones hides behind all this, like, I don't want violence, all this stuff, all of his words are meaningless.
Like, it does not matter because the larger worldview that he is perpetuating necessitates violence.
They understand that the clock is running out on them and that they've committed all these crimes and that they're going to be defeated.
And so like a giant squid trying to take its prey to the bottom of the ocean with it, it's wrapped around us like a face sucker from Alien and is not going to go down without a fight.
And I really think that everybody needs to carefully consider exactly what he's saying.
Alex is saying that in the span of three years, the Civil War rating has doubled, whatever the fuck that means.
His imaginary Civil War scale is a ludicrous trivialization of the serious topics he's discussing, but I'm going to go ahead and leave that aside for a second.
What's important is that he's saying that this thing has escalated very severely, and that if it goes up one more notch, that's the shooting war starting.
Bubbling over.
He doesn't want a shooting war, he says.
And then he wants to solve things peacefully, which is great!
What a relief!
Alex wants to resolve things peacefully.
And then he says, but.
That but is his whole career.
That but is the mask that he uses to cover up his extremist leanings.
He pretends to advocate for nonviolent solutions, but.
After that but, he clearly explains that there's no chance of nonviolent solutions, because the globalists are a squid trying to take the patriots down under the ocean, and that they're not going to go down without a fight.
I'm well known around these parts for giving Alex Jones the benefit of the doubt.
When everyone was complaining about his battle rifles comment, I was clear that I thought he was stupid, but he wasn't advocating violence necessarily.
It was more a fucked up fantasy that he had where he got to kill people in self-defense, which is super common for him.
I point these things out, but I generally don't think that he's crossed some sort of larger line.
I think that last clip is crossing a line.
He's telling his audience that we're mere steps away from a hot civil war, and there's literally no hope of any kind of peaceful solution.
If you're listening to shit like this and you believe him, why are you going to wait for the globalist squid to take your children to the bottom of the ocean?
If you believe Alex, the declaration of war is inevitable.
No matter how many times he pretends he doesn't want violence, when you portray the supposed enemy as being a rampaging squid that will kill you unless you kill it, you're advocating violence against that squid.
Alex is probably totally fine legally, at least according to rulings like Brandenburg v.
Ohio, which decided that the government can't punish people for abstract calls for illegal acts.
But I'm less concerned with the legal side of this.
I'm more interested in the moral and ethical side.
What Alex is doing is turning the temperature up on his rhetoric, and that is a troubling sign.
When Trump is referring to a possible civil war, and people like Rush Limbaugh are following that lead and normalizing the idea through more supposedly mainstream right-wing media, Alex has nowhere to go.
He has no reason to exist unless he's a little bit past the horizon.
And when the horizon is discussing a cold civil war, that means Alex needs to talk about the hot one.
This rhetoric is particularly unnerving on the heels of Sunday's episode where he rallied his audience to get to the streets.
The solution to all the globalists meddling on Sunday was go yell conspiracy theories at them.
And here on Monday, he's talking about a civil war with millions dead being inevitable.
This kind of disjointed messaging, this kind of escalation, all it does is make it more likely that someone listening will be convinced that the war is coming, so why the fuck should I wait?
All I can do is hope that that does not happen.
But if it does, be very, very aware that Alex did everything in his power to make that outcome more likely.
That is all he's doing here.
And like I said, I don't think it's illegal, and I don't think he has any punishment that's coming for it, but don't be naive to the fact that he knows that he's playing with fire.
He's playing with a gullible audience that's willing to believe clear misrepresentations that he makes about literally just about everything.
And he's saying the inevitability aspect of this.
He talks about that all the time.
Don't get me wrong.
I'm not saying that this is a unique feature of his rhetoric.
The idea that the globalists aren't going to go down with a fight or whatever.
All that stuff's all good and well.
We now have the president tweeting about civil war shit.
I just think it's more precise to say that the way they're characterizing things and the way this is being discussed, and especially Alex Jones, what it does is raise the tenor, it increases the temperature, and makes those sorts of things more likely.
And if you want to express it as they're killing people, then I understand why.
It was part of the speech that Douglass gave against slavery, which I should point out is an institution that Alex's ancestors fought the last civil war to uphold.
These are a bunch of people who have had power for a long time intergenerationally who just don't know what they're doing and just can't stop and can't back down and they want to be caught and they want to be destroyed and they're just power men.
It's called megalomania.
So what are we going to do?
They're not going to stop.
They want to fight.
It's existential.
They believe they must dominate us.
They must absorb us.
They must mount our head on the wall to finally be successful.
How is it that people don't look at South Africa as just a big, like, you can make a deal with the worst human beings on the fucking planet because it's either that or you turn into goddamn genocide machines and that's not how we should live.
When you study history, you look back at all the huge wars and the hundreds of millions dead and the horrible, corrupt, evil groups that would rise up and try to take power.
And you would then burn across the planet's surface like a plague of locusts and then finally would be met.
With the gift of hindsight, that's not a period I would call coming back to God and trying to make the world a better place.
Black Americans really suffered a lot, and the former Confederates were treated with a policy of leniency, so actually, Alex might look at that differently than I do.
But then, hey, let's consider the two big world wars.
In the aftermath of those wars, people did strive to make the world a better place, kind of.
At least I would argue they did.
After World War I, there was the creation of the League of Nations, and after World War II, the United Nations.
I would tend to see those organizations as at least attempts to make the world better and make human annihilation less likely.
Alex, however, sees them as globalist plots to take away his guns, so this doesn't quite work for what he's saying.
Looking over the history of wars, I don't think that his argument makes sense.
But it kind of feels right.
But like everything that comes out of Alex's mouth, it's utter bullshit.
Or he thinks the League of Nations and the UN were attempts to come closer to God.
One of the two.
I'm not sure exactly, but based on his own...
Entire world view.
The two biggest wars in modern history have not led to coming back to God.
They've led to the League of Nations and United Nations, which he thinks are attempts to destroy the world.
So, I don't know.
I don't fucking know what he's talking about.
He's talking shit and trying to encourage people towards a fucking civil war.
So one of the big essential pieces of this in order for it to fly is that Alex needs to paint all of his enemies again as satanic, which he's been working on since the 29th, the previous day.
It's a very major piece of this move.
He needs to make sure that you understand that everyone who you hate and who's trying to keep the Patriots down, they're all willing participants with Satan.
And so he takes a shot at Jack Dorsey, and this is kind of sad.
With his tweet from 2006 by Jack from Twitter, making the good pasta, reading through some amazing parts of the satanic verses, the golden threads begin to intertwine.
The title of that book is an allusion to a group of verses in the Koran that some have suggested are not divinely inspired, but said to be said to Muhammad by pagan goddesses.
But the word Satan is in there, so boom!
Alex is able to use it to prop up his dumbass satanic panic he's trying to whip up.
Something that I find particularly interesting is that this tweet is fucking old news to anyone who travels in conspiracy circles.
And that's because it was already subject to intense scrutiny during the whole Pizzagate affair, since Jack says the good pasta.
There's internet bullshit on this going back to November 2016, but the thing that I think is funny is that Alex is trying to reintroduce this and use it to call Jack a child-killing Satanist, but also pretending he's not like those other Pizzagate people who tried to use this tweet to call Jack a child-killing Satanist.
You understand, listening to this, I'm jostling between feelings of real sincere concern about the escalation of violence in Alex's rhetoric and his complete incompetence as a propagandist.
If anyone listening to this show googled the satanic verses, they would immediately see that Alex is either lying about it having anything to do with Satan, or he has no idea what he's talking about, yet he's making it a big part of the information he's disseminating.
What I'm saying is I'm deeply concerned about what Alex is doing, but I also see how easy it would be to get out of his trap, you know, if you were trapped in it, because his skills are so completely deteriorated.
And I really sincerely hope that people are able to see their way back to reality, because...
This is taking the form of a really destructive worldview.
Like two years ago, he and Roger Stone said that Trump's Diet Cokes were being poisoned with a slow-acting sedative that's also addictive or something.
All of this shit is the same stuff he's been saying for three years now.
They're making their move.
They're going to try and kill him.
There's nothing new about this.
And that's the thing that I guess maybe is more my point with how irresponsible this stuff is.
When the world is in hot...
Not a hot civil war.
When tensions are really high, the same sort of things that Alex does all the time take on completely different looks.
They become so irresponsible.
In other times, go fuck yourself.
But when tensions are rising and people...
I don't know.
You can't take this out of the context of the time it's being said.
And it makes it...
It makes what would normally just be, like, ignorable and, like, go keep rambling, Alex, into, like, yeah, you could get someone to do something bad with this kind of talk.
So that clip didn't sound right to me, so I decided to check what he's talking about.
There's a page on the ADL.org, their website, in the resources section titled, quote, Who are Antifa?
It's kind of a description.
It's just a description that Antifa is a word that's used to describe a collection of individual groups who are connected by their willingness to confront extreme right-wing street action.
But it's also not all positive.
From the page, quote, The article goes on, Additionally, violence plays into the victimhood narrative of white supremacists and other right-wing extremists and can be used for recruiting purposes.
This is what you might call a middle-of-the-road take, far from celebrating Antifa and saying that anyone who opposes them are automatically Nazis, or what have you.
What Alex probably takes issue with is that the ADL resists the urge to make moral equivalences between Antifa, even if you think their violence is not great, and the people who Antifa are protesting.
That said, it's important to reject attempts to claim equivalence between Antifa and the white supremacist groups they oppose.
Right-wing extremists have been one of the largest and most consistent sources of domestic terror incidents in the United States for many years.
They've murdered hundreds of people in this country over the last 10 years alone.
To date, there have not been any known Antifa-related murders.
This is not a document that's celebrating Antifa as much as it is recognizing that those individuals are responding to a real problem, but the ADL doesn't like some of the means in which they're doing so.
Yeah.
Alex's main gripe is that the ADL added some new entries to their database of hate symbols, reflecting that certain things had been adopted by far-right extremists as a way to signal to each other.
The bowl cut and OK sign were on that list, as was the use of anti-Antifa images.
If I had to guess, the reason that they added this anti-Antifa images to their list of their database is that the only people who really hate Antifa enough to circulate images about them are far-right extremists.
The ADL argues that these images, generally the Antifa logo of two flags within a red circle crossed out with a slash across it, it's just an updating of the white supremacist iconography that was used against Sharps, the group of anti-racist skinheads.
Nothing about this says that if you don't like Antifa, you're a Nazi or anything like that.
All they're saying is that right-wing extremists and white supremacists are using anti-Antifa imagery as a means of spreading their message.
I don't think that's a debatable point.
They're definitely doing that.
That is...
means that the ADL thinks anyone who says keep it 100 is signaling that races shouldn't mix.
This is an intentional misrepresentation by Alex in order to demonize the ADL?
Indicative to me of a lot that white supremacists have adopted a piece of slang that is 15 years old in the black community as a way of confirming themselves.
It's like, it's a little bit, you're showing your cards there a little bit.
Well, I mean, if you look at the ADL's list of symbols, it includes a whole lot of things that are just, like, the number 12 is included, because 1 and 2...
A and B, if you make the letters, Aryan Brotherhood.
12 is a number that's used by those Aryan Brotherhood people.
It's not to say that the number 12 is fucking racist.
So we need to classify Antifa as a gang because they show up to demonstrations in a uniform carrying weapons and are almost a militia.
By that logic, I have some bad news about how we would then classify all the people Alex likes who show up to demonstrations dressed the same, carrying guns, and are actually a militia.
I mean, good luck coming up with a metric to justify classifying Antifa as a street gang that doesn't also ensnare all of your right-wing dumb-dumb friends.
And so Trump comes in and he did fire all the lobbyists.
Now he says his staff secretly become lobbyists and run their own scams.
That's been a big problem.
Because just because Trump won't do it makes his own decisions.
It doesn't matter because the people under him are running all sorts of scams.
So a lot of them are bought off.
A lot of them are paid off.
A lot of them take money.
Then they can be compromised and they're told, you better go in and take out Trump.
You better find some reason or we're going to burn you and put you in prison.
And it's because Trump's never gotten full control of the Justice Department that they're making this move right now because they've still got some of their people in there.
But he has to do that, because Trump does hire and has employed a lot of lobbyists, and one of his...
Primary complaints, as we learned from listening to the time when Obama was elected, one of his first things that he said is he's filling the place with lobbyists.
So since that was his critique of Obama, it's a huge part of the Obama deception, that documentary, in quotes.
He has to try and depict the reality of Trump's administration as being like, he's the opposite, and that's not the truth at all.
That list includes Chad Wolf, the Chief of Staff for the Department of Homeland Security, Andrew Wheeler, the Administrator of the EPA, Reed Rubenstein, the Senior Advisor to the Department of the Treasury, Patrick Pizzala, the Acting Secretary of Labor.
In line with demonizing Antifa and what have you, he's now making...
Making it so he's predicting at the Joker, the movie, the premieres, Antifa are going to shoot up a bunch of people and they're going to blame Alex for it.
And hitting theaters this weekend, ladies and gentlemen.
The Joker about a guy living in his mom's basement who's the leftist, washed-up comedian.
Who goes out and commits mass shootings and bombings and all the rest of it.
And I told you, it's Taylor funded to trigger mass shootings.
And two weeks after I did a big report on it, the Pentagon came out and said, we've got intel that there are groups planning organized mass shootings dressed as jokers.
And they've got mentally ill methods ready to do it, and they're loading their social media with Trump and Alex Jones support right now, and they're going to march into those movie theaters, and they're going to gun people down, and they're going to blame you, the gun owner.
It's preemptive damage control because I think Alex is keenly aware that the people who are more likely to commit an act like that are also more likely to...
They know in all the studies that when you hype mass shootings, it causes mentally ill people to go out and commit mass shootings.
And they know these are all trench coat wearing, white male, incel devil worshippers that can't get a girl.
Texas, the last three times, trench coat devil worshippers can't get a girl.
Ohio, trench coat devil worshippers can't get a girl.
Florida, Parkland, trench coat devil worshippers can't get a girl.
Sandy Hook, trench coat, devil worshiper, can't get a girl.
Harrison Kleibold, the original beta test, trench coat, incel, devil worshiper, can't get a girl.
And then the media hypes it and hypes it until it becomes an option.
Don't commit suicide.
Don't have suicide by cop.
Don't jump off a bridge.
Go kill people at a school.
They're disarmed.
And the demon in them directs them to do it.
And then disarm the American people so the Red Terror can have its way with us in a full, long, protracted civil war where America finally has its will broken.
Not going to happen.
Because we've got the jump on you.
We've got the jump on you, ladies and gentlemen.
We're going to defeat the globalists together.
We're going to go to break, come back with some good news about everything they're doing falling on their face, their minions being exposed from Trudeau to...
Thunberg, and then we'll take your phone calls.
But this is the big push by the globalists.
This is the big fight.
This is history.
Please don't forget that we don't have globalists or Soros funding.
So if you follow that, the theory is that movies and TV shows are hyping this sort of thing in order to precipitate Shootings that are actually false flags in order to take away Alex's guns, which will trigger a civil war so the Chinese can take over.
I was down in the break room getting a little cup of coffee during the break, and I just was standing there waiting for the coffee to finish making because somebody started a new pot.
So Alex decides that he's going to take calls for pretty much the rest of this episode on the 30th because he wants to know what his audience thinks we should do, which is usually a bad sign.
We're going to go to break, I promise, and come back with Javon and Brandon and Josh and Lillian and Frank and Jack and Kirby and Kim and Peter and Lillian.
I'm just going to move the person and move the next.
What do you think about their move to impeach Trump?
Are they going to try to kill him?
What should we do to counter this?
Because I don't want to just sit here like a spectator while history's happening.
Don't just go to live Democratic events and legally and lawfully take them over in a peaceful way.
We've got to get the message out that we know the corporate media is a bunch of liars and this country isn't a civil war.
But the people running the Civil War are anti-Americans that say our country shouldn't even exist and our president's bad for saying it shouldn't even exist.
But what are your other ideas?
What do we do now to not be spectators?
Before this gets pushed into a physical Civil War and we wish we would have worked back when we had a chance to fix things peacefully.
That's to excuse the likely outcome of the rhetoric that he's putting into the world, which is shootings and bombings.
They're planning to do that to blame us.
But, hey, you can't blame me for that because I keep saying legally and lawfully as if I have some reason to believe that my audience is inclined towards non-legal and non-lawful behaviors.
You wouldn't think that you have to say legally and lawfully in the same way you wouldn't be like, why did you need to say you weren't going to read my diary?
We need to get Trump to do more televised address, not just little two-minute things or minute-long things or 45-second-long things from the Rose Garden.
He needs to absolutely let the globalists know that we're taking action.
And you know what he is?
They wouldn't be saying, oh, Barr's a traitor, he's compromised, the Attorney General must step down, if they didn't know the indictments are coming.
Trump did it.
He didn't blink.
The indictments are there.
It's confirmed.
They don't have the Deputy Attorney General say no to stopping prosecution unless they've greenlit it.
It's done.
You want somebody to take action?
He's doing it.
And he's got all these cowards under him that are scared to implement it.
All these people surrounding him, lying, leaking, blocking.
I'm surprised he didn't get anything done.
All he can do is put the info out, be stalwart, and stand while he's surrounded, just like InfoWars.
That is funny how so many people who would describe themselves as rugged individualists are suddenly at a loss for what to do the moment a fictional being no longer gives them fucking...
I don't have posts on a message board to tell me what to Google anymore.
Oh, no!
So Alex, like, but I think the most important piece is that Alex is just, like, on QAnon level in terms of this, like, there are all these indictments waiting to go, and that's why they're panicking, and that's why...
So Alex gets these calls, and he wants to find out some solutions, and here's one of them.
unidentified
I just want to thank you for waking me up.
I do want to plug the products, but I honestly think the best thing that anyone can do right now in this sort of hysterical situation is get a Trump t-shirt, get a hat.
Go out there and represent, no matter where you're going.
And that is absolutely not a corrupt God that we are worshiping at all if our best way to support him is to purchase things that personally enrich him.
So, Alex, the hat thing is kind of like, I guess you could be overly generous to that suggestion and be like, well, what that would do is show Congress that there is rampant support for Trump because of all the hats.
You could say that because, Alex, I think that he believes that that would solve an essential problem that he has, and that is that Congress is too weak.
The shooter who attacked the baseball practice was not stopped in one second.
There was an approximately 10-minute shootout with him before he was taken down.
Alex is completely making that up.
And in the process of that shootout, he also shot a police officer, congressional aide, and a lobbyist, who by Alex's definition probably had no business being at a congressional baseball practice, but oh well.
None of the people that Alex names were at that practice, like Jim Jordan.
The only person who was there that Alex has a lot of love for is someone he doesn't really champion anymore, and that's Rand Paul.
Jeff Flake was also there, but Alex really doesn't like that dude.
What is true is that the perpetrator of that crime was a left-wing extremist.
It's kind of illuminating, though, to see the different responses and the way people handled that news.
Of particular note was how Bernie Sanders responded to news that the man had volunteered for his 2016 campaign.
Quote, I have just been informed that the alleged shooter at the Republican baseball practice is someone who apparently volunteered on my presidential campaign.
I'm sickened by this despicable act.
Let me be as clear as I can be.
Violence of any kind is unacceptable in our society, and I condemn this action in the strongest possible terms.
Real change can only come through nonviolent action, and anything else runs counter to our most deeply held American values.
There's no attempt to pretend that the dude didn't work on his own.
I find it hard to believe that Alex would respond similarly if, I don't know, let's say a couple of his listeners ended up killing three people in Las Vegas back in 2014.
Nope.
Alex thought that was a false flag to make him look bad.
Also, Alex thinks that the shooting of Gabrielle Giffords was a false flag meant to take away his guns, so I don't think he has any fucking ground to stand on with this bullshit.
As for that train situation, Alex is a real piece of shit.
What happened there was that on January 31st, 2018, a train carrying a bunch of Republican Congress members was en route to a retreat in West Virginia when it collided with a trash truck.
No one on the train was seriously injured, but Alex seems to forget that one person who was in that truck that was hit was killed.
For someone who seems to pretend to care about humans so much, seems to forget about a lot of them.
All the other people who were shot at the baseball field, this guy who died in the truck.
Yep.
unidentified
The National Transportation Safety Board conducted a full investigation of that incident and decided that what had happened was that the truck driver...
Truck's driver tried to go around the lowered safety gates to cross the railroad thinking there wasn't a train coming, and they believed, based on a minute-by-minute breakdown of the event, that it tended to indicate that the driver was impaired.
This was a tragic accident, which was immediately transformed into, they're trying to kill the GOP, as a narrative really quickly.
There was ultimately no truth to that at all.
Alex's narrative is particularly stupid because there's tons of pictures of the aftermath of the accident and they've been published.
You can see that the train is still on the tracks after the collision.
It would be so easy to produce evidence if the tracks had been blown up and there's no evidence of that at all.
There's plenty of evidence that defends the version of the story that I have just told you.
The only thing backing up Alex's version is Alex said it.
Do a mass attack and blame it on us combined with the you need to protest legally and lawfully to back to they're going to false flag us and blame it on us to take our guns right back to do this but legally and lawfully is such a consistent like I am doing everything in my power to have documented evidence that I tried to not get this shit.
You're watching a WWE event, and there's a bad match, but you can tell from the way they're shooting it that it's clear that this match, the optics of it, are meant to be played in a sizzle reel for something later.
So there's some image that's meant to be iconic within this, even though the actual match...
Right, right, right.
That's what I hear here when he keeps saying legally and lawfully over and over and over again.
That's to defend Infowars and the off chance that someone gets up close at one of these rallies and does something.
It doesn't indicate anything like he knows something's coming or anything like that, but it's just fucking insane how consistent this is and how weird.
What it actually, I think, illustrates and demonstrates is that Alex is smart enough to understand that the trends...
In the actual world, are lining up and dovetailing with his rhetoric in such a way that it's very likely that someone is going to do something fucked up.
And so, this is preemptive damage control on the off chance that someone does.
Now, hopefully no one does, but Alex needs this in order to protect Infowars as a business, as an entity.
That's what he's doing here, while at the same time continuing on in the same path that makes these sorts of things, these tragedies, more likely.
Because if they do, then he's going to get a lot of publicity.
To me, and I don't want to believe that he's that much of a psychopath, so I don't think that he would do that on purpose.
But it really does seem like if somebody did fucking do something and they've got an InfoWars sticker, then InfoWars is going to be all over the fucking news, and he already has the legal and lawful defense prepared.
Well, on our last episode, when we were talking about the day of the Boston bombing, we heard him be like, oh, I hope they don't blame me, wink, wink, wink.
I don't want to believe that he would, and I'm not saying he's doing it, and I don't want to believe that he would ever do it consciously, and so I won't.
It's a weird feeling because I know how bad these people are and I'm really mad at myself for not fighting hard enough and not doing enough.
I mean, we're dealing with absolute pure evil in the way we've all just been desensitized and put into this comfort zone to live right next to it.
And then, quite frankly, I think about other options than Infowar.
And on every path with the brainwashing they've run, that'll only turn that against us, even though it's spiritually right at this point to physically remove these people from power.
So he goes to calls again, and he gets a caller who brings up the remnant, which is sort of Christian identity code for the people who will be left after there's like a big culling.
And if you understand that stuff, you can hear the code and the discussion that's going on on that level.
And then she has a solution for what people should do, and it's stupid.
unidentified
Also know that Christ said, God said, that it would be a remnant that would be sold out to him.
But that's okay, because he only needs a remnant that will stand up.
To this evil.
This evil has been, this deception has been going on since the beginning of the time, starting with Cain, and it will continue until Jesus comes back again.
And so my suggestion of how we can really make a difference in fighting this war is if every single person...
That is a regular listener to your show would commit to give just $5 a month faithfully every month until this thing is over.
And again, it's not going to be over until Jesus comes again.
But if they would commit to just giving $5 a month, let's say there's 2 million of us faithful listeners out there.
If you multiply $5 times 2 million, That would be $10 million a month that Alex would be getting in that he could count on.
You always, every show, you mention our God and Savior and Jesus Christ as our only solution.
You should, you're obligated, Alec, to ask for contributions that would be graciously given if you would set up an organized way so that we, your listeners, millions of Christians around the world, Jesus Christ.
unidentified
Those that are conservative, we would support you.
He doesn't take many calls, because he never does.
And two of them are overtly religious extremists.
Who are calling in, and their main suggestion, one of them is millions of Christians should give you money, and the other one is a more concrete, all of your listeners should give you $5 a month so you have $10 million a month.
I think that when Alex is getting on air and he's talking about solutions and how do we avert this civil war, the idea that two people would be overt religious weirdos and they would both come up with the idea of monthly donations for Alex, which already exists, it seems strange to me.
But they have a little conversation, and I don't really care, but they say one thing in it that I think is worth pointing out, and it's this.
unidentified
You know, a lot of these things, this is scary, right?
We have New York City this week coming out and saying you're going to get fined $250,000 if you call someone an illegal alien, if you ask them to speak English.
And by the way, I totally forgot to cover that the last three days, and I went and read it.
I thought, oh, this is a fake headline.
It says if our hate board of leftists decide in any way, and they gave examples, if you kick illegals out because they didn't pay the rent, $250,000 fine.
They always misrepresent situations where vulnerable communities are provided with protections and portray them as creeping moves where the state will punish you, a private citizen, if you dare breach their guidelines about political correctness.
So, this is something that was done aggressively in terms of motions that were made to protect LGBTQ folks.
Notably, the 2015 human rights guidelines released in New York and Canada's Bill C-16 of 2017.
They were constantly decried by right-wing scam artists as being about a ploy to lock you up if you dare to use the wrong gender pronoun.
Trans and non-binary people would immediately become overpowered beings who, if you offended in any way, they would send you to prison or the poorhouse.
In reality, the Canada bill was about housing and employment discrimination and added gender identity and expression into the category of things you're not allowed to discriminate on in terms of public service.
Luna, I want to discrimi- This is the same thing with the New York guidelines.
They were about workplace discrimination and protecting LGBTQ individuals from being the target of unsafe working conditions.
Now, here we have Alex, a noted promoter of white identity beliefs, and Andrew Torba, the owner of Gab, which is the place where bigots and Nazis go when they get kicked off normal platforms, talking about how New York has introduced $250,000 fines if you call someone an illegal alien.
What do you think this story is really about, Jordan?
It's about workplace housing and public accommodation discrimination.
The new guidelines laid out by the New York Commission on Human Rights mostly has to do with how, if you're in a position like you're an employee or a landlord, you can't treat someone differently because you assume they might be an immigrant.
For instance, you can't ask if they're a legal resident because they have an accent unless you ask everyone who doesn't have an accent the same question.
The same goes for discrimination based on English proficiency or anything that would...
any kind of stereotyping you might have of non-American natives or whatever.
The document also clarifies that, quote, the use of the terms illegal alien and illegals with the intent to demean, humiliate, or offend a person or persons in the workplace amounts to unlawful discrimination.
Alex is trying to create the perception that people like undocumented immigrants are above the normal rules that his brave and noble white friends are subjected to, because it helps to feed his victimhood complex, without which he wouldn't have ever made a dime on this show.
The guidelines clearly lay out ways that tenants, of any documentation status or nation of origin, can be evicted.
If you're a landlord, you just can't try to evict someone by intimidation, for instance, by threatening to call ICE.
This extends to ignoring tenant complaints or attempting to intimidate tenants into not complaining about property issues by implying or threatening to call ICE on them.
Here's how I know that Alex and Torba are gigantic bigots.
They would be discussing these guidelines as they actually exist, instead of trying to create straw men to attack.
They know they can't do that, though, because to oppose these guidelines is to advocate that employers and landlords should be able to demean their employees and create abusive working environments just because they think they're undocumented immigrants.
They would have to advocate for legitimate systemic racism and xenophobia, where if you weren't a white person, you just had to suck it up and live with whatever shit people in positions of authority did to you.
And here's the thing.
They do want to advocate for that.
It's the situation they want to have in the world.
But they're smart enough to know that if they came out and made those arguments sincerely, they'd run the risk of being seen clearly.
And then this whole facade of free speech disappears, and donations from non-racists completely dry up.
I was going to say, if we want to take the lawsuits that Alex's own former employees have sent against him regarding his treatment of them, it's like...
Yeah, he does want to be able to threaten and bully people with whatever bullshit he wants to.
And create unsafe working environments for minorities and women, yeah.
So what they do is they try to find a way to attack these guidelines without making it look like they really just want non-white people to have no protections in society.
They create the straw man that this is about destroying free speech.
And if you, some random white man on the street, call someone an illegal alien, you'll be fined a quarter million dollars.
And just like that, they can turn their audience's opinion against these human rights protections without having to say why they really take issue with them.
This is one of the very elementary tricks Alex does all the time.
And it's often appealing to pretend that he's just stupid and he doesn't know what he's talking about.
hasn't read the statute, blah, blah, blah.
But this pattern is too consistent.
He knows what he's doing, and what he's doing is whitewashing attempts to attack societal protections against systemic harassment and abuse of non-white persons.
And he can go fuck himself.
Yep.
unidentified
This is all just coded white supremacy that he is expressing.
These people know we're kicking their ass, and they want full control for authoritarianism.
You think stuff's bad now?
I'm physically in total fight mode.
I'm not going to do anything physical.
But intellectually, my brain has done the math, I've looked at it, and I can't help my brain now not going into combat mode.
Doesn't mean I'm going to do anything I'm not.
They're starting combat mode because they're losing the info war.
But I'm here to tell you, folks, I've been on here 25 years, and you could take 25 of the years they didn't compete with what's happening now energetically.
Like a complete admission that your show has a problem.
And that is that if you don't say twice in 35 seconds, I'm not going to do anything, people are probably going to assume you're saying you're going to do something.
I mean, it's fair that maybe some people are definitely far too stereotyping of southern people and also far too stereotyping the other direction of people in the north.
I can't do a show without somebody coming up to me afterwards looking both directions and being like, how do you feel about jokes like, and then insert minority, you know?
And this next clip doesn't help any of the feelings that I'm having about these two dudes.
unidentified
I mean, if you're a Christian, if you're a straight white male, if you're, you know, someone who's off the plantation or the Democrat plantation or thinking for yourself, you know, you're going to get attacked, you're going to get smeared, and we are the great oppressors.
But, you know, the reality is that we're the ones that are speaking the truth, right?
We're speaking truth to power, and we're winning.
And again, like I said earlier, we have God on our side, so no matter what happens, we can't lose.
I mean, he's expressing that, you know, Christian, straight, white men, we're always painted as the oppressors, but we're the ones speaking truth, and we're winning.
And I have to spend all this time coming up with ways to argue against human rights protections for people and make it look like it's actually about oppressing me.
If you have real complaints, you wouldn't have to go out of your way to misrepresent this protection for folks in New York.
You just wouldn't do stuff like that.
You would spend your time on valid criticisms.
You wouldn't misrepresent a Netflix movie.
You wouldn't spend...
Half of one of your shows talking about Bob Dylan selling his soul to the devil.
You wouldn't misrepresent a Jack Dorsey tweet from seven years ago about a fucking Salman Rushdie book.
You wouldn't do any of this stuff if you had real complaints.
This is all misrepresentation in service of justifying the victimhood status that you have, which only serves to justify why this inevitable civil war is coming and you're right for it.
That's all that's going on.
Now, Alex, in these last two clips that I have, I think that these are bad.
And they're again coming back to this violence, nonviolence, back and forth.
And I think that Alex is trying to convince people, whether he's making the argument clearly or not, that nonviolence is not an option.
We have to swarm D.C., but instead of always swarming, you know, the mall and the nobody covers it, the halls of the Senate and the House, you go right through, you go right to their damn offices.
Get in there and get in their faces in a legal and lawful way.
He needs to constantly say, Don't worry, guys, guys, guys, guys, guys, I'm serious.
I know that everything I'm saying about how they're the literal devil and that they're going to try and kill, or not just try and kill us, they will commit extermination against the great, noble, white, Christian patriots of this country if left to their own devices.
I'm saying don't commit any crimes.
Everything I'm saying, my entire worldview, everything I'm screaming about leads you to the conclusion that these people must be destroyed.
I mean, we're in literary device territory now, where it's like, by turning legal and lawful into a refrain, you're turning it into a winking aside that you don't want legal and lawful activity.
I think that there's all sorts of interpretations you could make of this, and none are very good.
But, I mean, the bottom line of this is I don't think it's illegal, but, like, one of the things that I feel so...
Like, I don't think that this is a good episode of our show, even.
Because I think that there's so much, like, eh, ooh, eh, on Alex's part, that I don't think that there's much to deconstruct outside of, like, well, here's what he's saying.
At the same time, I think this is really important because what he's saying is leading towards a negative outcome.
So I hope nothing happens.
I sincerely hope nothing happens that is a national tragedy.
But should something happen, Alex, his entire career at this point in 2019 exists to normalize that, to make that more likely.
And he can say do things in a legal and lawful way all he wants.
It doesn't amount to a hill of beans.
Because the overriding piece and the overriding sense and the feel and the rhetoric, everything else, is a contradiction of that.
He can say that to keep himself in legal safe territory or to defend himself should something bad happen.
I know it's been way too long since we talked about space weirdos and had something that was a little bit lighter and a break from this shit, because I think we definitely do need it.
But it's such a...
Bad timing of coincidence that these 2013 episodes are at this really high tension point, and at the same time, in 2019, we have just crazy bullshit going on.
I promise we will get back to more frequent breaks and diversions, but we just can't.