Today, Dan and Jordan discuss Alex Jones' very weird last week. In this installment, the gents find Alex encouraging his audience to go bother doctors at abortion clinics and announcing that the end may be near for his career. Also, PJW manages to outdo himself in terms of lazy journalism.
Because we do essentially no promotion whatsoever, the only reason that we've grown to the point we have is because people who listen have shared it and have been very, very supportive.
We've grown now to the point where we could pursue doing ads on the show.
Leadership that's positive is doing things you know are right that you know are going to end up hurting you but end up in the end being proven right and launching whole new human systems of success and empowerment and enlightenment.
As humans ascend and become closer to God, that's leadership.
Sabotaging culture, learning how to manipulate people, engaging in deception is cancer.
It's knowledge of evil.
It's a virus.
It manipulates systems that already existed and causes entropy and collapse.
Have you ever looked into a clear blue sky laying out on a green hill in the fall and just laid there for hours on a blanket and then watched the sun slowly set?
You can see the diamond lattice of the universe, God's handiwork in the firmament.
There's a real feeling that I had going through this episode and preparing it.
He's saying a lot of extremist shit that we'll get to.
Stuff that is so fucking crazy.
And I'm sitting here and I'm like...
Oh, no, no, Alex is talking.
We have become so inundated with his behaviors, whether it be from a bigotry standpoint or from a disgusting performance-based, like, I'm going to say that all of our enemies want to kill your children and I'm the only one who can stop them and now you need to give me money.
I just think it's pretty interesting, you know, the way that you got this framing of stuff being much more consistently put into the terms of like, we're better than your church.
So one of the other things that's upsetting is that there seems to be a trend, along with Robert Barnes being on all the fucking time, there's another guy who seems to be coming up a lot more frequently, and that is that guy Tom Papert.
If you recall, he is a guy who runs a station out of Wichita.
So he comes on and he talks about how the Infowars audience has responded to times when they have, like, his TV station has a power blackout or something like that.
They have an interruption of service.
And I think that if you listen to how he describes the audience, he wants to put it in terms of them being very into the programming.
I'm pretty sure my church, when I was growing up, was not revealing post-birth abortion, because that doesn't exist.
They were not telling us all about all of the other bullshit that he's lying about, but I'm pretty sure the pastor would be pissed off if somebody was like, no, no, no, don't tie it to the church, tie it to the...
and what you get into alex is really the intelligent part of this because they're doing less intentionally it's not by accident that we have the u_n_ trying to destroy western countries it's not by accident that we have been doing Okay, Tom.
So, this is in the middle of a tirade that Alex is on about how the commies and the ANC were horrible anti-whites, but not only that, they forced the Zulu, the indigenous people of South Africa, to live in a tiny section of the country called Zululand.
The first misconception Alex seems to have is that Zulu only live in Zululand, which is actually called KwaZulu-Natal.
Zulu people live throughout South Africa and elsewhere, but if you just see Zululand on a map and you're stupid, you might get the idea that, hey, that's where all the Zulu are.
When the British arrived in the late 1800s in South Africa, they immediately got into a bit of a fight with the Zulu, who by that point had a monarchical system in place.
Britain demanded their subjugation and surrendered a British rule, which the Zulu were not.
The British eventually conquered the Zulu nation and divided the kingdom up into 13 substates, which I assume is most likely because it would be much more easy to manage things that way.
The Zulu king, Dinozulu, made an alliance with the Boers and declared Zululand its own independent country a little while after.
This worried the British, since that alliance would give the Boers access to a port which could hurt British trade dominance in the region, so the British just annexed Zululand.
Yeah.
unidentified
The most important thing to remember is that the legacy of Zulu being forced to live in KwaZulu-Natal is not the legacy of the ANC.
When apartheid was still in place, hundreds of thousands of Zulu who lived outside KwaZulu had their land taken and they were forcibly relocated to KwaZulu.
It's not really all that different than any other formulation of white nationalism you hear, where you want non-whites to go somewhere, but on the off chance the place you send them to has a bunch of resources you want, you still want to be clear that you're in charge.
Due to the displacement of thousands and thousands of Zulu to KwaZulu in the years of apartheid, the distribution of Zulu population does skew pretty heavily towards KwaZulu.
But it's not the ANC or Nelson Mandela who did that.
It was the white apartheid government.
The way Alex is presenting this is very blatant and completely irresponsible.
He's pointing to a direct consequence of the brutal apartheid system and then blaming the consequences on the people who were subjected to said brutality.
Pure and simple.
This is an expression of overt white nationalism, and that is the prism through which he's looking at the world.
Rwanda, where the small Christian tribe that only got Christianized in the last 400 years ended up having 90-plus percent of the wealth.
And then the UN and the globalists came in because they wanted the people that had all the land in control, and they killed the Christian minority with the animist.
That, you know, just one group was Christian, when in reality both were mostly Christian, or similarly Christian.
And you have one group that was Christian, and therefore they became really rich, and then the UN wanted their stuff, so they sent these animists after them.
When it comes to trying to defend the unborn, when it comes to believing in America, these churches tell you how moral they are all day, and I guarantee you those preachers aren't.
They're probably down at the gay bar giving blowjobs right now.
He claimed that they were planning to put people in re-education camps who didn't give up on capitalism and that 25 million or so people would need to be killed.
And, of course, Alex confronted Weather Underground guy, Bill Ayers, about this.
And Bill Ayers explained to him that Larry Grathwold was a weird snitch who hung around.
No one trusted him, and he just made up a bunch of people.
And Alex has decided not to take that under advisement and still believes that everything Larry Grathwald said is 100% true.
And so Alex talks about that a little bit.
And then I think that Tom Papert got trolled and he thinks it's real.
Because this is a crazy attempt to launder just, I guess, a fucking dumb internet joke into being like, these people are sincerely planning on the jobs that they're going to have with the Red Army.
So some of those concerns that I had about Tom Papert having these white tendencies, let's say, were really elevated by some comments that he makes in this next clip sort of about countries.
So Iceland has been very historically Icelandic, ethnically speaking.
That hasn't been true lately, though, largely because of big economic upturns in the Icelandic economy, which has the effect of drawing people in who are looking for opportunity.
In turn, Iceland has the incentive to welcome immigrants in because their economic success is aided by an inflow of labor which the immigrants provide.
The image of Iceland in the head as someone like Alex or Tom Papert is a homogenous place where everyone is white.
According to a 2017 census, 10.6% of the population of Iceland were first-generation immigrants, up from 4% in 1990.
One of the great difficulties about immigrating to Iceland is that it's a big island 900 miles away from Norway.
Getting to Iceland is a difficult feat for someone trying to immigrate.
And for many years after the 2008 financial crisis, it wasn't a hugely appealing option.
And in fact, a ton of native-born Icelanders took that as a sign to leave the country.
As the economy has diversified and the tourism sector has skyrocketed, Iceland is a place that looks a lot more appealing as a destination for someone trying to find a place they can survive.
Iceland is a country with a relatively small population, and it was starting from a place of very low immigration.
Switzerland is an even worse example for Tom to use.
Switzerland is consistently ranked very high on the list of countries with the highest proportion of their population being foreign-born, with a number sitting at around 23%.
Compared to the US, at approximately 14. A lot of these immigrants are from EU countries, but make no mistake about it, it's not like all the people who Tom would call Western, those are the only people who are immigrating to Switzerland.
There's a large population of Tamil people who fled the civil war in Sri Lanka, who have resettled in Switzerland.
There are large numbers of people from Croatia and Serbia who have made Switzerland their new home, as well as Filipinos and Pakistani populations that are particularly large.
What Tom is saying is categorically not true, but it feels right to people who yearn to live in a white ethnostate.
They want it so bad that they have to pretend that their imagined enemies have created these pure enclaves without immigrants, that they're just hogging for themselves.
Because even these globalists who preach all day about multiculturalism secretly know that you've got to just be surrounded by your own race.
They know it.
They know it, and they're keeping it to themselves in Iceland and Switzerland.
Also, tax rates are an insanely complicated thing to compare across countries, but if you just look at the highest and lowest tax rate brackets, there's very little difference between the United States and Iceland or Switzerland.
There doesn't appear to be too much to what he's saying, other than what feels true to him, namely that these countries are ones that he associates with whiteness, and they're better because of it.
When the volcano erupted and shut down travel from the UK to the United States, Iceland was non-stop on there and their tourism jumped the next year by like 70%.
It was crazy.
And since then, of course, more people are showing up and all of them are from a lot of different places.
So there you go.
Maybe a hundred years ago you could say that Iceland was very...
So, Alex gets into talking about, I can't remember his name, that Democratic donor who would bring African-American dudes into his home and then inject them, like overdose, allegedly.
Well, there's something about black people, and I'm not a Satanist, I don't know it, but like the Rolling Stones just came out, sacrificed a black kid at their house in New York.
It's very hard to find it, but it was in the 70s.
Dead kid at their house, yeah.
They really tried to expunge it, but the point is, is that, yeah, there's a favorite of Satanists is killing black kids, and they like to kill all kids, and little girls especially, but they love to kill black kids and drink their blood.
The first thing is likely the killing of 18-year-old Meredith Hunter at the Rolling Stones concert at Altamont.
That was a young black man who died in the proximity of the band.
I think Alex is taking that and he's combining it with another element, which is the death of Rolling Stones founding member Brian Jones back in 1969.
Jones was found dead in his pool and the circumstances surrounding the death have been the stuff of conspiracy theory and conjecture ever since.
Occam's Razor tells us that he was a completely insane drug addict rock star in the late 60s who was on a path of increasingly self-destructive behavior.
And him getting fucked up and drowning in his pool accidentally isn't that surprising as a possibility?
But you have the fact also in this case that someone made a deathbed confession that they drowned him.
And all sorts of other side theories about satanic rituals and feuds with Keith Richards and Mick Jagger fly around all over the place.
All of it's fascinating stuff, but ultimately it's not a story I can really disentangle for you.
Except to say that I think this is what Alex is combining with Altamont to turn it into a story about the Rolling Stones killing a black child at their home.
But this is, you know, we've already seen shades of pretty white nationalist, white supremacist-ass thinking, and now we have this wrinkle of, like, real Christian supremacy.
Like, he's indicating in some way that there is a substantive difference between you the minute before you become a Christian and after from a, like, And he doesn't even bother with the whole baptism angle of, like, you go down under the water and then you come back up smarter.
I would suspect he even made up this Fantasy Island story in order to allow him to make this cover story for his racist outburst along with his wife while hiking.
And then the city council decided to amend a city ordinance in July, saying it's now legal to camp out on the city sidewalk, poop on the city sidewalk, sleep on the city sidewalk.
The left doesn't just cater to it and make money off of it and skim the cash.
These higher-level demons don't materialize until their gremlin force is there.
So it's like for each major demon possession that happens, I think, they have a certain number of gremlins, humans that carry lower servant demons.
So I think that's why the left brings all this in and celebrates it, is to get the servant demons into position so that they can bring in a heavy hitter.
Well, especially in abusive ways that are so reductive and especially blaming people for their experience of homelessness when largely there have been a lot of studies that have been done about systemic reasons that a lot of people are in the situations they're in.
So Alex has a personal grievance, and I think it's not true, but he is very creative.
I'll give him that.
His big thing that he is pushing for towards the end of this episode is, look, you know, the globalists are bringing in the homeless people to shit on the street in downtown, so why don't we send them to the city council members' houses?
Now, this is all good and well to sort of joke about, but what Alex is describing is a targeted harassment campaign, which is kind of what he's getting sued for right now in the Sandy Hook situation.
I don't understand.
The way he conceptualizes this, and the fact that in this next clip he will say, I'm going to pay homeless people to go to their houses, could get him in trouble if he pursues this plan.
I think we should find where all the city council members that voted for this, and I think we should encourage and go online, because the homeless are all on iPads and phones they're given, too.
We should invite everybody and say we're going to have free barbecue at their house, and then we should give them money to camp in front of their houses.
That's it.
That's it.
That's the operation.
We will bring the scum of the earth to their house.
And doing research on this whole kettle of fish that has been the Taliban invited to Camp David, and then did Trump cancel it, or did somebody else cancel it?
The word is that Mr. Bolton, Likes to leak stuff to the press.
And that is why he is out.
The man is a neocon.
The man is a warmonger.
The man has serious issues.
And I respected the president enough that I've not made a huge issue out of it because the president overall has had good policies and obviously wasn't listening to Bolton who would have us in World War III if he could.
We got Roger Stone popping in to give us his take on Donald Trump's new National Security Advisor, Mr. Bolton, who a lot of people really don't like, including myself.
Because he still pushes the failed Iraq war and other things like that.
But the word is on Bolton, he knows all the connections, he knows all the players in the State Department, in the UN, in the Pentagon, and that he will be an apparatchik or a tool, an effective munchkin, to use his words.
To carry out the policies that the president once carried out, and then he won't sit there and leak information.
And so we get to see that all over again, kind of.
And Alex gets to pretend that...
Because, I mean, okay, if you want to talk about, like, the strictest interpretation of things, Alex did say negative things about Bolton when he got...
Of course!
But he also He overcame those bad things because of Roger.
So now he gets to pretend that, like, hey, I said those negative things about him back then and pretend that he didn't try and make it okay that Bolton was being nominated.
He's having his cake and eating it, too.
So now we learn in this next clip that Trump has a temper, which is not something that Alex has talked about all that much in the past.
And I can tell you that Trump is screaming at people.
Screaming at them.
Which, believe me, that goes on behind the scenes at the White House.
A lot of screaming.
It looks very composed and very together out in public, but behind the scenes, Mr. Volcano.
He's either super slick and nice and friendly, or he starts screaming at people and telling them they're idiots and they're morons and they're incompetent, and that's what Trump does.
Alpha male characteristic, not obviously fun for those around it, but Trump really is trying, really does care.
That's exactly the way he describes Hillary Clinton in private.
She yells at people.
I do understand, but it's so funny to me that he can go and just for years, he's been screaming about how Hillary Clinton yells at people behind the scenes, and he can turn around and be like, you know, hey, with Trump, it's one of those things.
Yeah, and I think there's actually, there's something a little bit worth pointing out in this clip.
I don't want to belabor this since we talked about it when he's covered it a bunch of the past, but I do think there's a slightly side issue that's important.
In major newspapers, like the Wichita Kansas Eagle, they're like...
Oh, local parents, when they take the kids on the field trip in elementary school to the library to sit on the lap of drag queens, they want background checks done.
That's homophobic.
We're not going to do background checks, is the question.
They won't even do background checks when the law says everybody else at the library has to have it.
You see?
And it turns out a large portion are convicted pedos.
Of course they are.
The two running, the Houston one, were both convicted child rapists.
One raped a six-year-old brutally, another an eight-year-old.
The story that Alex is talking about is naturally being presented, like the Wichita stories, being presented with zero context.
And honestly, I think what he's doing kind of is close to something that could be legally actionable as slander.
So the Wichita story involves a library floating the possibility of specifically running background checks for sex offenses only on participants in the Drag Queen Story Hour.
Now, this obviously is an issue for a number of reasons.
The first is that any real background check they would be doing would turn up sex offenses.
So this is kind of redundant and targeted framing of the issue.
By publicizing that they're specifically running background checks for sex offenses for participants, the outcome is that people couple the idea of drag queens and the LGBTQ community as a whole as being related to sex crimes.
It's my understanding from looking into this a bunch, since Alex won't stop talking about it, that most library systems do routine background checks on people who are running events for children.
And I think that's probably an appropriate thing to do, regardless of who the person is running the event.
If it's a drag queen story hour or a Second Amendment reading shoot nanny, as long as the policy isn't selectively enforced and used as a means of marginalization, it feels like it's the library's right to do that.
It doesn't feel like that is what the policy is about in Wichita, however.
This does feel like it's selective and meant to target the LGBTQ community, as evidenced by released library minutes from a meeting reflecting that this proposal was brought to the table by a noted anti-LGBTQ pastor named Craig Coffey.
He seems to be interested in the targeting and marginalization side of this possible policy.
This is not a man who's concerned with whether or not the drag queen's telling stories or sex offenders or not.
He wants them to be gone from society, or at least to stay in the back alleys, seedy porn houses, and dark closets.
He's against their existence, particularly in public, and their inclusion in a larger society, so he wants to create as great a campaign against them as possible.
That's the motivation behind a campaign like the one he's engaged in.
Stir up a bunch of shit about sex offender background checks about these people and whether or not you find any offenders, you will have succeeded in associating the story hour participants as being sex offenders.
This is really shady shit, particularly when the motivation is so clearly just to make members Absolutely.
Coffee runs a church called the Refiners Family Church in Derby, Kansas, which is 12 miles outside of Wichita.
So, I mean, it's pretty cool that this out-of-town preacher is making what a library in a city he doesn't live in his business, but I guess that's the culture war.
So, from there, what you've got is this guy who has a clear anti-LGBTQ stance and is against them, puts forth this motion in the library meeting, and from there...
If you read what Coffey is suggesting to the library board, it's very clear that he's a gigantic homophobe and someone who's worried about the, quote, gay agenda.
So it would make sense that if you're on that board, you might not want to go along with everything he's saying.
If the board is at all resistant to his message and his demands...
It's so easy for the blogs and shithead websites to frame the situation as something like, quote, Kansas Library Board divided on whether to let sex offenders present to children.
Ultimately, the reality is if this were a Bible reading or Second Amendment book shoot nanny, none of these people would even suspect or be concerned about the possibility that one of the presenters might be a sex offender.
They're only concerned because of their pre-existing bigotry towards the LGBTQ community.
Perhaps the ultimate irony is that all of these people are right-wing, anti-state people, and they're demanding that the state run background checks on people, which I believe I've heard called tyranny when it's done in related to gun purchases.
This is the same group of people who are like, white male Christians are being specifically targeted and harassed and they're being treated as a minority and they're trying to kill us all.
At the same time, I would like everybody here to target this minority and treat them like the awful people that they are and so on and so forth.
So we've gone over this, but the case in Houston that everyone relies on to be like, there are sex offenders.
And Alex is exaggerating, too.
There have been tons of them.
As far as I can tell, there are these two in Houston.
It was a situation where background checks are already required for all people who hold events at the library, but the library didn't follow their own procedures in this case.
The only real angle of outrage that you should have is be upset that the library didn't do their job.
And in this case, again, the publicity surrounding the event was not led by people who were concerned with whether or not these people are sex offenders.
It was led by a group called Mass Resistance, who are an aggressively anti-LGBT group as a whole.
And their goal wasn't to make sure that the library is a safe place for children.
It's to marginalize a community.
The fact that these events have been going on all over the country for a while now, and this Houston situation is really the only one these people ever point to as justification for the contention that there are tons of pedophiles in the direct.
Queen story hours it you know it's all a big plot to get your kids that kind of leads me to believe that they're wrong yeah You have aggressively interested parties like mass resistance and tons of anti-LGBTQ organizations pouring over criminal databases and sending out FOIA requests.
So you'd definitely be seeing way more stories if they found anything.
The issue for Alex, where I think that he's getting himself into trouble, possibly, legally, is that he's speaking in specifics that don't really match reality.
The leaders and organizers of the Houston chapter are Trent Lira and Devin Will, and neither of them are sex offenders.
And in fact, they've discussed the revelations that people who had volunteered for their event had concealed their past actions from them candidly.
It was devastating for them, as they obviously didn't know about these convictions, and they'd followed the library's policies, and the library were the ones who failed up to hold their end of the bargain.
One important point is that when this story is covered, right-wing sites don't just use pictures of the drag queens.
But also, let's not forget to be very clear that people like Alex and all of these people should go straight up fuck themselves for their duplicitous actions in this case.
Now, granted, you still have to sort of like understand that the only reason that conversation is even happening coming from this guy is because of his preexisting feelings and bigotries.
But, you know, like I said, most of the libraries that I've looked into that are related to any of these stories already have this rule in place.
If there is a library I think that's a good idea.
Then, absolutely, there should be a conversation that it should be.
It's kind of gross that the conversation is being spurred by this, but I think it's probably a very small number of libraries that don't already have this in place.
Whatever the case is, it's all dishonest framing, and it's all fucking stupid.
So anyway, we move along, and in this next clip, Alex, he's on some gun paranoia shit, and he lies quite a bit.
My specialty is being particularly convincing in my nonsensical, disconnected, disjointed worldview.
So this is legitimately bullshit.
What Alex is lying about is a new article discussing breakthroughs regarding post-traumatic stress disorder.
One of the difficulties with PTSD diagnoses involves the stigma that comes along with the condition.
Often patients are unwilling or resistant to disclose their symptoms for fear of being labeled crazy, which really only makes things worse.
A group of researchers set out to see if there were any indicators that they could find that would prove as an effective screen for physical markers of people suffering from PTSD, and their findings were recently written up in the latest issue of Molecular Psychiatry.
They found 27 chemical signatures, which, when combined with heart rate readings, were found to have an accuracy of 81% distinguishing whether a person had a pre-existing diagnosis of PTSD.
It's very clear, however, that, quote, the results aren't diagnostic, but instead serve to screen someone for how likely they are to have PTSD, which is to say that just testing positive with their set doesn't qualify as indicative of a diagnosis, just a sign that it's maybe something someone should explore more.
And his first thought is that there's a blood test they're going to use to try and force everyone to take so they can get my guns.
And that's just abhorrent.
People who suffer from PTSD are living in a certain kind of hell.
And anything that can be done to get them the treatment they need to be able to live again is something very positive for them subjectively and for society objectively.
Alex doesn't care about alleviating the suffering of people who are truly experiencing something awful.
He doesn't give a fuck because his overarching paranoia doesn't allow him to.
That is monstrous shit.
I have nothing more to say about that other than boo.
I can definitely understand why Alex is trying to deflect this story about Trump's Scotland Hotel, the Trump Turnberry Resort.
If he dealt with it critically, it would really expose how much of a bootlicking hypocrite he's become.
The issue with Trump's hotel goes like this.
There is a refueling stop that could be made at the Prestwick Airport, which no one is claiming Trump owns.
However, he does have a hotel nearby, and if military or government personnel are more frequently stopping at that specific hotel without other good reason, it does tend to indicate that something corrupt is up.
No, it's because he, as the president, he cares so much about the military and the Air Force that he gives them free room and board at his hotels, right?
In 2015, the military stopped at this airport for refueling 95 times.
So far this year, they've stopped there 259 times, and the increase doesn't seem to be related to an uptick in travel that would explain the rise.
Making matters more concerning, in 2015, there were only 40 overnight stays for personnel at that location.
Not the hotel, like at that airport.
Overnight stays required.
That number jumped when Trump was elected, and this year there have been 220 overnight stays logged, which is an over 500% increase in overnight stays at the airport that happens to be near one of Trump's properties.
But it's not like Trump had a business arrangement with Prestwick Airport, because that would be crazy.
I regret to inform you that Donald Trump does indeed have a business arrangement with Prestwick Airport.
The Guardian, among other news outlets, have reported that Trump and Prestwick entered into an arrangement where Trump's resort offered cut price lodging for people flying into the airport.
And Trump would try to steer business toward Prestwick by way of making his resort a tourist attraction.
Both the airport and resort were losing money previously.
And what do you know?
Now they're not.
This is a case where it doesn't even really matter if Trump knows what's going on or is directing the increased traffic to Prestwick.
It legitimately doesn't matter because the appearance of impropriety is strong enough that this needs to stop.
The president has a pre-existing arrangement to help increase traffic to this airport and now that he's president, the military is stopping there way fucking more than it did before.
Whether this is the result of a coordinated corruption activity or not, it does not matter.
This is a consequence of having someone in office Jimmy Carter got rid of his peanut farm.
This is in the Constitution.
The document Alex professes to love so much.
And his actions here are directly working to subvert that.
He knows that Trump is profiting off being president, whether he's directing corrupt behavior or not.
And Alex doesn't care.
He supports it.
He claims the media covering a story like this is them lying about Trump, which is such through-the-looking-glass authoritarian propaganda that it's hard to even express what a fucking loser he's become.
He's carrying water for the president to be able to profit off his being the president.
Like, it's insane.
While still screaming all the fucking time about, Oh, the Constitution!
The people who love the Constitution most, the people who have a copy of it, a very small copy in their back pocket at all times, are watching the President shit on that Constitution, and they are eating it up.
But it's just, like, it's one of those things where we should probably rewrite that constitution if it's so easy to shit on it and force people to eat it.
But I think there's something really important that we need to talk about at the beginning of that clip.
Alex couldn't make it more clear that he's a white nationalist unless he just started screaming, I'm a white nationalist.
When he's talking about the idea that Democrats are going to have the numbers by 2024, he's not talking about some kind of political phenomenon.
He's explicitly signaling to the ethnic demographic anxiety crowd.
Most of the fears about whites becoming a minority are framed as being about the year 2045.
That's the year that's constantly cited as the point at which white people will make up just slightly less than 50% of the U.S. population, which of course is a fate worse than death to these people.
Some of this traces back to work put out by the Brookings Institute, who made this exact prediction in a report published last September.
The 2045 date is a big talking point, but if you look at the graphs of their projections, 2024 is also a very important point for people who are super invested in white identity.
That's the year that the white population will have an annual growth rate of 0%, meaning the birth and death rate will be equivalent.
This is an essentially important date for white nationalists because it's the turning point after which the white population will begin decreasing, which again is something that they don't see as a natural phenomenon in open societies as much as they see it as a prong in an international plan set out by evil globalists.
That sounds right.
This rant is about nothing except his demographic fears.
This is white panic embodied.
It's scary and sad on one level, but it's also kind of hilarious on another.
He's so afraid of white people not being the majority in the country that he completely flips out and starts screaming about how his rich relatives don't give him money.
It's the embodiment of pathetic, entitled bigotry.
So, the entirety of psychiatry is based off of telling people who are either poisoned, genetically inbred, which, tell me more about genetical inbreeding, Alex.
Or possessed by demons.
So they tell those three groups, if not all three in the same person.
Especially considering it sounds like somebody told him he had some sort of schizophrenia and he decided that he was actually just poisoned or possessed by a demon.
The two of them get into a conversation about how the globalists were really just trying to buy time because they knew they needed to steal the 2020 election and all this shit.
Sure, sure, of course.
This is some hot bullshit, and it leads to one of the crazier things that cannot possibly be true that I've heard Alex claim.
And that's why he's accelerating action now, because he realizes their whole endgame was just to buy time, then get to 2020, manipulate 2020 to get the outcome they want, and then they don't have to worry about this anymore.
And that's why we harp on it, because if we don't have real communications, people aren't going to know that they're teaching six-year-olds, and I'm not joking, in library books, in public schools now, to go with men at parks, the bathroom, and have sex with them.
Now, obviously, they're not going to get away with that if we're on air to expose it.
You can make whatever argument you want for or against the curriculum.
You can say that it's an important public health information.
I'll agree with you.
You can say that you'd rather teach your child that stuff at home, and I'll respect your parenting.
None of that matters.
Because the bill is very explicitly...
And the fact that it includes a provision where parents can opt their children out of the curriculum.
You don't want your child learning that stuff in school?
Problem solved.
This is a non-issue.
I read an article about this, and I assume what Alex must be talking about is some of the curriculum involves education about domestic abuse and sex trafficking.
So I imagine that he's taking a lesson or something in a book about how you shouldn't go to the bathroom with a stranger and arguing that it secretly is a way of trying to get children curious about going to bathrooms with strangers.
So I assume this is what Alex is talking about since complaints about the curriculum are making the rounds a little bit in the right-wing spheres.
So it makes sense that he'd seen a misleading headline and decided to report it even more misleadingly.
But here's the larger point.
This is his first example he can come up with for why the world needs him to be on air.
If it weren't for him, no one would know this completely fake thing about a book telling kids to fuck strange men in park bathrooms and how it's evidence of the globalists trying to steal your children.
Alex is actually making a very compelling argument for why society needs him to not be on the air.
It needs to be, ideally, I would like him to go back to a Gorka type or someone that has populist, nationalist, realistic, realpolitik instincts in that space, to give him practical, strategic advice that is consistent with and consonant to his values.
So Alex now goes to a call and he asks this caller, or actually I think the caller just brings it up on his own.
He's got another suggestion of who needs to replace Bolton.
And this is interesting because it spirals super out of control really fast.
Alex is really excited about this idea.
unidentified
What I'm going to talk about today is what I think we need is a constitutionally and very strict on that note based Oh, You know, somebody like Bill Benny who understands the Promise software, the Pegasus malware.
Well, that's what they did to clean up some of the third world countries, is they create a special military unit that the president and the attorney general support, who then goes and roots out the corruption.
It happened three years ago that they were about to pass a law to ban partial birth abortion in Texas.
It didn't pass.
And hundreds of women showed up in business suits and began going, hail Satan, and sticking their tongues out like demons, and going, I mean, we'll play the video.
So, you have to understand, this is real.
And the devil wants children, and these people get spiritually high as a kite when they get possessed.
And you've got these dead, empty followers out there, and to them, this is the most alive drug they can get on.
And it's a drug.
It's not just for the elites digging out the pituitary gland and the adrenal glands out of the brain, out of the stomach.
Now, the centerpiece of Alex's abortion arguments that he's making, and really the pièce de résistance, is a new report that Paul Joseph Watson put out.
So I found the source for what Paul Joseph Watson is reading here in his very powerful special report.
It's a year-old post on Reddit's r-sex board.
It's weird how he managed to find this post if he wasn't specifically looking for something to make a big deal out of and connect to a larger editorial decision to make 9-11 about abortion, which Alex is clearly doing.
Seems weird, considering the post is a year old, it only got 18 comments and was 50% downvoted, so there's no way it would ever pop up if you were just scrolling through Reddit.
The reply comment that Paul is reading only got one upvote, and it's pretty far down the thread.
So he'd have to be selectively choosing this one to discuss because the rest of the comments could be summed up as, this is messed up, or I'm not sure I believe this story because people on Reddit make stuff up all the time.
Around the time they posted this question that Paul is reading about their friend who's into breeding, they also posted this gem.
If you're on birth control and let's say four to five males come inside you vaginally around the same time, does each male increase my likelihood of getting pregnant?
Or as far as you're on birth control, it doesn't matter how much.
I personally have a copper IUD, but I'm unsure if it's aimed at one male or also multiple.
So make no mistake about it, this is a real fetish, just not the getting tons of abortions part.
Like if Paul Joseph Watson did some deeper research on the scholarly website reddit.com, he would have found an Ask Me Anything thread from a girl purporting to have this breeding fetish, and she explains that she's on birth control.
Which is very common.
From the people that I've seen talking about it, they're able to imagine the situation as being one that leads to pregnancy and role play it a little bit.
But they aren't so irresponsible that they would get pregnant just for the sexual rush they'd get out of it.
And people have different reasons for enjoying the fetish, too.
If you look at the people who talk about this online...
For some, it's about a submissiveness.
Some see pregnancy as taboo, given their life circumstances.
Some men just really like how pregnant women look.
It's a big old world out there, even within just this one kink community.
This is a larger group of people who indulge in this fantasy, and for the most part, it doesn't seem like they're harming anybody.
Is it possible that there's a very, very small segment of the population that recreationally gets abortions?
There's one case specifically that seems to be brought up a lot when people try to make this argument, and that goes back to a 2009 ABC News story about a woman named Irene Villar, who was a self-described abortion addict, who wrote a book called Impossible Motherhood.
However, to define her as just an abortion addict is a very unfair portrait.
Velar was the granddaughter of Puerto Rican nationalist Lolita LeBron, who stormed the U.S. House of Representatives with a gun back in 1954, which put her into jail for 25 years.
LeBron was sterilized as part of a program in Puerto Rico when she was 33, and that trauma lingered in her family as sort of a ghost that hung over everyone's reproductive life.
Her mother would go on to commit suicide when Velar was eight years old, leading to her going away to boarding school.
She then went to college at Syracuse and began an emotionally abusive relationship with a 50-year-old professor who was specifically opposed to children, saying having them kill sexual desire.
Most of the abortions that she got were during this period where she was in a relationship with this abusive professor.
The way Villar describes her abortions is a form of self-harm.
And if you look at the larger portrait of her life, it's very easy to see that this is a person who suffered trauma in a very specific form that took this outlet.
It has very little to do with the larger picture of abortion access, and it's not indicative of a group of people who are serial abortion getters.
Outside of this one person, I can't really find any evidence of people who get a bunch of abortions compulsively.
Like, the idea that this is a large community of people who do.
Nor is there anyone from Planned Parenthood or any similar organization advocating for that.
This is a straw man that Paul Joseph Watson has created out of a year-old Reddit post that he's dug up and pretended is news, specifically for the purpose of attacking women's rights to control their bodies and medical decisions.
This is a pathetic display of journalism, because you've got to assume if he had something better, he wouldn't be using an obviously fake year-old Reddit post to make his argument.
Also, his boss has admitted that he's paid for at least ten abortions with different women, some of whom didn't want to get abortions, something that strangely doesn't seem to be unpacked in this weird diatribe.
Some employee at Planned Parenthood would absolutely talk to some journalist and they'd be like, we see Louisa every three, every six months, you know, or three months and it's been going on for 30 years.
Paul Joseph Watson and Alex spend all their fucking time talking about how they're the real news.
And they're the ones who are getting really to the bottom of it.
And Alex's big pageant that he's putting on for this 9-11 abortion spectacular, the centerpiece of it is Paul Joseph Watson's report that the primary source of for his argument that there is this new fetish that's coming around that involves everybody getting abortions is clearly fake shit that's a year old on Reddit.
So this comfort room narrative is circulating in the right-wing media right now because a woman named Jill Stanek recently spoke in defense of the Born Alive Act.
And her words are being used by right-wing activists to fuel their campaign to get rid of women's rights.
She described these comfort rooms where pregnancies had been terminated, usually due to complications or genetic conditions that would leave the child unable to survive should it have been born, came out technically alive but not viable.
What's interesting to me is that these articles about Stanek's comment, they generally include this line.
Quote, this incident prompted Stanek to end her employment at Christ Hospital.
Which obviously gives you the impression that she saw something horrible and then quit because she couldn't be around it.
That's not true.
Jill Stanek was fired by Christ Hospital after she allegedly took pictures in areas that completely violated patient privacy and then, quote, misrepresented the hospital on television.
I probably sound a bit flippant, but that's probably because her comments kicked off a little bit of drama, and the Illinois Department of Public Health ended up doing a formal investigation into her allegations and found that there was no wrongdoing on the part of the hospital.
She's someone who made a fantastical claim 20 years ago.
Then all these claims were looked into and found to be inaccurate.
She was fired by the hospital on the merits.
Then she started working for WorldNet Daily.
I'm not sure this is a source that I find to have much credibility, but Alex does, of course, because it works into what he wants to present.
He doesn't even deal really with the fact that this is like 20-year-old That's insane.
There's a thing here that in the context of talking about this article about Jill Stanek's comments about things that she talked about 20 years ago, there's a real cruelty and brutality to what Alex...
is expressing towards the parents, or the would-be parents.
And in this next clip, I think he just crosses a line that is unbelievably unacceptable.
Complete with a first photo machine if parents wanted professional pictures of their aborted baby, baptismal supplies, gowns and certificates, foot printing equipment, and baby bracelets and mementos, and a rocking chair.
Because you didn't want it!
So you took it and fantasized it, but it's all the creeping death.
Yeah, I wonder if he thinks that footprinting or memorializing their lost child is a behavior that anyone would engage in if they weren't taking this decision very seriously and making an emotionally difficult choice.
Does he legitimately think that anyone would do this shit for fun?
What he's describing and mocking is a part of grief.
It's mourning and honoring a child you never had.
There's a long history of this sort of thing cross-culturally.
Like, I remember in a religious studies class I took in college reading a book called The Haunting Fetus about rituals some people in Taiwan would carry out to provide food and care towards pregnancies that had been terminated, honoring the fetus ghosts.
In Japan, it's not uncommon to hold Mizuko Kuyo ceremonies to honor and recognize the spirits of children lost to miscarriage, stillbirth, and abortion.
These are not historically uncommon things because people need to process emotionally resonant occasions.
And even if you're making a decision to terminate a pregnancy, that doesn't automatically mean that it's not going to affect you.
And sure, that's not always the case, and some people don't have an emotionally impactful experience with terminating a pregnancy.
But I find the idea of Alex mocking the idea of people grieving to be so fucking disgusting.
They're literally proof that everything he believes about abortion, namely that people are all just going around getting them for fun, is complete bullshit.
Because he can't wrestle with that, he has to mock this and act like it's the most insane thing ever, when in reality, it's his callous position that is insanity.
I imagine that what Alex is describing is a fantasy scenario where I guess Trump is in power forever and they outlaw abortion and then they kill everyone who works at Planned Parenthood.
That is not politically being opposed to a woman's right to choose.
That is...
I mean, I know.
He does his little bullshit about, we're going to legally and lawfully execute you.
This is encouraging violence towards people who work at abortion clinics, who are Planned Parenthood employees, who are people who advocate for women's health.
This is sincerely one of the most dangerous ways he could be acting on 9-11!
It's more insane because you could argue that 9-11 was the single, was like the flashpoint that led to America cannibalizing itself over the past 20 years.
Sure.
unidentified
Like, you could argue that 9-11 is going to take down the entire...
You know, I don't know if you could draw a straight line, but I think you could make an argument that a lot of the ripple effects of it have been things that have led to the state we're in now.
You get around abortion clinics and you'll see people walking in going, I mean, whatever you want to call it, killing babies all day ain't good for you.
I thought they loved it.
We're going to roll video where the doctors walk in going, and they'll go, planet serving us.
One of the trends that you see there is you've got to see it.
That's a bad suggestion.
Because what he's doing is sort of telling his audience that you should go to abortion clinics, you'll see their demons, and we will rightfully and lawfully execute them at some point.
And he makes it even more overt in this next clip.
In about the last three, four months, we passed a demarcation line, a point of really no return, where I am selling product that I have.
And I'll be able to continue for a year at our current even slight expansion rate.
But then when all of that product is sold out, there'll be no money because I won't be reordering.
And so now I've reached the point where I can actually count it.
I think we're going to have a countdown to the shutdown of InfoWars.
365 days?
I mean, really, that's true.
And I don't like the enemy to know this, but they've already got moles and they spy on us.
I mean, they're fully aware.
But all the things they've done to us, you know, having to pay a higher rate for just merchant accounts and having to pay for all our own bandwidth and having to have 24-hour security up here, you know, armed, trained security, and to have it at my house.
Because it is definitely in line with the trends that we've seen from Alex.
He constantly talks about wanting to quit, wanting to be a farmer, and shit like that.
He has been kind of checked out for a bit now.
His legal fees have got to be exorbitant.
There's no way he can keep up with all of the expenses of this stuff.
And we heard, I don't know, was it a couple weeks ago, maybe, he was talking about having to have a decision about whether or not to order more product.
But I think he's also been doing these money bombs a lot in these marathons, and I think there's diminishing returns to it.
Well, of course.
I have to assume that that's part of the calculation that they've made.
It's like, okay, yes.
This amount of money that you can get from selling all of the stuff in the warehouse will get you so far.
But at that point, you're fucked because you don't have the money now to reorder and keep the business going.
You have the money for either.
You can do one of them.
So basically, he's in a position where, let's say it costs $5 million to run the operation for a year, and it also costs $5 million to order the product.
He could spend that $5 million now for the product and hope that more sales will come, but then he's running on nothing for the show, and he couldn't pay bandwidth fees, all that other shit, legal fees.
Or he could afford that $5 million to run it for a year.
At that point, he has nothing left in order to reorder supplies that he could be using to sell.
That's the framing that I see it as kind of being where he's at.
I don't know if that's accurate.
He could be full of shit, but I've not heard him speak this specifically and this morosely.
And then I don't want to sit here and plug all day on air about the great products we've got.
I'm just going to tell listeners that I'm not going to dial things back.
I'm not going to lay a bunch of people off.
I'm just going to go 100% into the election, and I'm going to spend everything we've got, and I'm just going to put everything on the front lines and go all in to reignite Americana, to expose the globalists, and to ignite populism worldwide.
And I'm not going to just fizzle out and trail out here.
Now, if you want to listen to that call and go buy a bunch of products and sign up for Autoships, you don't forget, and if you want to tell others about the show and you want to really get aggressive to support the Infowar, that'll be wonderful, and we'll go into the election year and get the funding we need.
But I'm currently selling out of products and discounting them to sell them where I cannot fund the operation and buy more product.
So you understand that.
It's kind of like you're on a mission, you've got fuel, and you've got to get to a certain place.
But when you get there, there's no fuel to come back.
You understand?
And I'm not going to sit here and just dial back and cut people's pay and then just kind of wobble on to the future.
I'm going to 110% pedal to the metal, work as hard as I can.
People are noticing I'm more focused.
I'm more on target.
Because we're going into a critical crossroads and we're going into 25 years of InfoWars.
Will it make it 26, 27 years?
Can you imagine the victory the globalists will have if we're not here?
I make it really easy to get the products.
I mean, we go out and go, what's the best-selling skin cream?
unidentified
Well, it's hyaluronic acid with vitamin A. See, that's why I don't necessarily believe this.
This is such a perfect thing for him to do in order for him to get people to cover it and be like, hey, Alex is going out of business and then he'll come back and be like, I am not.
Okay, well, there's feces everywhere and homeless people and trees falling down in front of cars to rob them.
And what, tourism's down 80%?
I mean, why the hell would they be doing this?
unidentified
Right.
Tourism is down heavily in cities like Paris, Stockholm, London, and tourism is up in other countries where things are much safer and where there aren't that many migrants.
Cities like Dubrovnik, Croatia, Split, Croatia, Krakow, Poland.
So Alex is kind of twisting Macron's words just a little bit.
From what I can tell, he said that Africa is the continent of the future, which is a little different from what Alex is presenting.
It also makes sense for a French president to say something like this, because a large portion of Africa is part of what's known as Le Mans Francophone, or the French-speaking world.
Places like Côte d 'Ivoire, and there's 18 other African countries where French is the official language.
Anyway, that's a small point compared to something far more important.
The things that Alex and Dan Lyman are saying here are not true.
According to the local out of France, in an article from April 2019 about their tourism industry, quote, France has just enjoyed a record year for visitor numbers.
Connection France has an article from August 2018 discussing how France is the, quote, champion of the world in tourism.
There's some truth that tourism took a little bit of a dip in 2015 in the wake of those two high-profile terrorist attacks.
But that was just a temporary setback, and things are going really great in the tourism sector now.
The UK is seeing a slight dip in tourism numbers, something around 3% this year compared to last year.
But there's no reason to say that immigrants are the reason that number is low.
If you ask the UK tourism organization Visit Britain, their story is a little different, as they told The Independent.
Quote, we've seen a slowdown from Europe with our research showing concern on the impact of the uncertainty of Brexit is having on visitors from the EU.
According to Macro Trends, this is part of an upward trend where 2016 saw a 12.89% increase in tourism, and then 2017 continued that trend with an 11.29% increase in numbers of tourists that came to visit.
There's no truth to what Dan and Alex are saying here.
They're making shit up based on their feelings about these cities and how many videos they see of scary brown people in them and YouTube.
That's all they're expressing here is that they don't want to visit these cities because of how many immigrants are in them, which is undeniably racist.
And then with Croatia, he's just making shit up there, too.
Allow me to read to you from a July 2019 article in Total Croatia News.
Quote, After several years of growth at unrealistically high rates caused by external factors, the We have to prepare ourselves well for these new circumstances and be prepared to fight for each and every guest, said Franco Palma of the Croatian Chamber of Commerce.
Oh, yeah.
Who knows?
The argument these guys are trying to make is that bringing in immigrants has crushed France, Sweden, and UK's tourism industries, and places like Poland and Croatia are on the rise because they have no immigrants there.
They're further asserting that the people in charge must have known that bringing in immigrants would have this effect, so they must be doing it for a reason, probably because they wanted to crush the tourism sector to destroy the economy.
If you take a step back and look at the numbers, it's easy to see that both of these arguments aren't based on anything other than Dan and Alex's feelings about immigrants, namely that they hate them.
What stings the most to me, because I feel like it's a microcosm of that nationalist worldview, period, is when they say things that are not just not true, but...
Where their perceptions about these countries are completely molded by these sensational videos that they see posted and taken out of context and reporting from people like Paul Joseph Watson, who sees fit to use a year-old Reddit post that's clearly bullshit as evidence of something.
So they're already that...
So when you talk like this, you can lie about whatever the fuck you want.
And it's better for you just to use your feelings.
According to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees report for 2015, China definitely does have a low intake of refugees, but Alex is still being completely unfair and lying.
A vast majority of the refugees they accept in China are from Vietnam.
However, that year they also let in 182 Somalians, 86 Nigerians, 52 Iraqis, 45 Liberians, and 362 people from unspecified countries.
These numbers are very low, but it's also unfair for Alex to say they don't accept a single person.
I know Alex is really pushing hard for Trump to have an immigration policy that's tough and is designed to, let's say, quote, promote economic development and national security while maintaining social stability.
So it's really super ironic that Alex spends all day yelling about China and pointing fingers at them while really actually wanting our country to be more like them.
When I hear him say that China doesn't let in immigrants, it's easy to hear him saying that if he thinks it's bad that they don't.
In reality, it's a baby throwing a tantrum, saying China can do it.
And then I like the protein bars because they're a good sort of intermediate snack.
So when you want something to eat between sort of lunch and dinner or between dinner and a late snack, and you don't want it just to be, you know, Little Debbie's or Swiss cake roll.
But one thing I've looked for over the years is when I was in law school, they had something they called two-way, which allowed me to have sort of peak mental ability during law school exams.
And the only side effect was when you crashed, you crashed.
But there was no other major side effect to it.
Turned out there were some illegal products in it, so it's no longer available.
I had that speed that I took back when I was in college, and I've never found anything that was quite as good as that, but now I found Brain Force, and it's just like speed.
Well, at the same time, not having the single moment of clarity that he should have had, which is, it turns out I was taking something that I didn't know what was inside of it, and it was speed.
So this is the 9-11 episode, and he does not get into 9-11 until about the third hour of the show.
He just plays a clip of Trump being interviewed on TV on 9-11, but he mysteriously edits out that part where Trump brags about now how he has the biggest building in the city.
I don't care about the little bit that Alex talked about 9-11, because it's kind of the standard bullshit you always hear him talk about, and it's just too...
It's too unspecific and stupid.
Yeah.
Like, his version of all...
What he sounds like is someone trying to sound like an expert, but who's forgotten all of his curriculum.