Today, Dan and Jordan stick around in the past to continue their investigation into what Alex was up to in 2013. In this installment, they find Alex thinking that Kim Jong Un is specifically trying to bomb him, and inviting Steve Pieczenik to come back on the show and double down on his theory that no one died at Sandy Hook.
But based on our Monday episode where we discovered the arrival of Steve Pachanek back in 2013, coming in hot, throwing Sandy Hook crisis actor talk all over the place, I realized, like, I've got to see what's going on.
It feels like there's momentum, and I have a real sincere interest in following that thread.
So today we're going to be going over March 29th to April 1st of 2013, and there's going to be some interesting developments which confuse me and frustrate me.
And before we get to that, though, all the confusing and fun and informative and frustrating things, I'd like to say thank you to the people who have signed up and allow us to create that frustrating and informative thing.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I like what these dudes do, you can support our show if you'd like to by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show.
So what that's about is that he was driving into work that day and a piece of plastic came off of a truck and apparently blocked his windshield for a while.
So the leader of North Korea is going to bomb a United States city solely to get rid of Alex Jones, which will almost immediately end his country's existence.
Alex is placing himself, his radio show, those two entities, on the elevated pedestal of being geopolitically relevant as a target.
I can't believe someone would listen to his show and not be concerned about his well-being after saying something like that.
Or, this guy is so full of shit, he's fucking around.
That kind of a thing being expressed by someone, you'd just be like, either you're crazy or this is completely unreliable bullshit.
So Alex is responding to a post on NK News, North Korean news, with the headline, quote, North Korean photo reveals U.S. mainland strike plan.
I've read this article, and I have to say that from the blurriness of the photo that's included, I don't even think it's a fair assessment to say that Austin is even one of the targets.
There is a line on the map, supposedly a missile path, which appears to end in central Texas.
But the problem is it's unclear if the path itself stops there or if that's just where the picture of the U.S. map is blocked by one of the North Korean soldiers' hats.
It's a problem.
Because of this unclear image, even the NK News article said, quote, a composite overlay appears to show San Diego, Washington, D.C., Hawaii, and possibly Austin as being primary targets in a North Korean attack plan.
They had to make a composite overlay where they superimposed the map over the soldier's hat and then guessed where that line ended.
His hat also covered the entire southeastern United States.
That line could have ended anywhere.
But it's probably Austin because Alex has been talking shit about Kim Jong-un.
The other thing that's important to point out is that this image was not information that North Korea released to the world to threaten people.
It was published in NK News after they found an image in Rodong, the newspaper of the Korea Workers' Party.
The folks at NK News believe that this is indicative that the message was intended for an internal North Korean audience, not the world.
John Swenson Wright, senior lecturer in East Asian International Relations at the University of Cambridge, said to NK News, quote, it seems reasonable to suppose that the target map is designed for home consumption and to create an impression of war readiness for the DPRK citizens that is part of a wider policy of strengthening national resolve.
This was a piece of propaganda meant for an internal audience, for a dictator to both scare and reassure his people.
It's so wild to me how Alex can take something like that, give it a half a second's look, and decide that the real story here is about himself.
There's no evidence that Austin was even one of their targets, but Alex sees that shit and his immediate angle is, Kim Jong-un must listen to the show.
This is deeply troubling, because the only two explanations I can see are outrageous levels of narcissism to the point where he actually believes that Un listens to his show and is gunning for him, or an almost unbelievable level of comfort knowing he can say something that stupid and his audience will just believe it.
To me, so much of this has to be water off a duck's back for so many of his listeners, where it's almost like they stroke out unless something applies directly to them.
In the same way that Alex can't pay attention to anything without applying it directly to himself, you know?
Like, he says all this narcissistic shit, and his listeners are like, okay, all right, back where he's yelling about something else.
Even if you don't take that in and fully internalize it as something important, it still gives the appearance that, like, well, I mean, dictators want to take Alex out.
So Alex has another headline that he wants to get into, and this is another thing that I believe is indicative of Alex's pattern of saying that everybody in various situations are actors.
This is a trend that's running counter to Alex's Sandy Hook path, and this is the path where we've seen him say that some people in the Aurora shooting were actors, the G20 person who was arrested was an actor, and now we have another example.
American terrorist in Syria was working for CIA, says, Father, well, I saw the videos the guy put out going, I'm a former Marine, but now I fight for al-Qaeda, and al-Qaeda's good.
So who he's talking about is a guy named Eric Haroon, who is an American citizen who was arrested in a very complicated situation back in 2013.
There's a version that Alex is putting forth, which is that he was an American soldier who decided to start saying al-Qaeda was great, most likely because he's a paid actor, and then the government had to stage an arrest to cover things up or something.
Obviously, the globalists paid him to pretend to support al-Qaeda because he's part of a larger psy-op to make you think that white people can do bad things like terrorism, which Alex would tell you is impossible.
Beyond that just kind of being a dumb conception, his version of this story is painfully oversimplified.
Haroon had been in the Army, but had some bad behavioral issues when he was enlisted.
According to the New Yorker, a fellow soldier who served with him said that he was, quote, about a week away from receiving a full-blown dishonorable discharge, which was averted when he was a passenger in a drunk driving crash, which led to him suffering from a skull fracture.
He got a medical waiver and an honorable discharge, thus ending his formal fighting career in the U.S. services.
In the years that followed, the New Yorker paints a picture of a really fucked up guy.
guy, discussing his stalking an ex-girlfriend, which ultimately led to him shooting himself in the abdomen when she wouldn't take him back.
He was arrested twice for DUI and just had a real troubled path that led to him going overseas and staying in hostels and meeting people and getting interested in freedom fighting.
In all the interviews I've read, including a pretty in-depth piece in foreign policy, it's abundantly clear that Eric Haroun was not an al-Qaeda sympathizer.
He was a committed anti-Zionist who joined up with rebels in Syria because he wanted to help overthrow Assad.
And in the process, he allegedly accidentally got mixed up with Jabhat al-Nazra.
He had joined up with a separate group that was ostensibly aligned with the United States, but after a skirmish in the ensuing chaos, he got a ride in an al-Nusra truck away from the fighting, and he ended up embedded with them for about 25 days, which you could kind of believe is a mistake, considering that Haroun didn't know Arabic.
Due to his linguistic confusion, there's even some doubt that he was actually ever even with al-Nusra, as opposed to the possibility he was with a group Lusra.
like al-Nassar, and he just didn't know the difference.
When his father says that he was working with the CIA, as Alex discusses, it most likely doesn't mean that he was in Syria because he was working with the CIA, but that he was negotiating with the CIA to be able to return to the United States.
In the Foreign Policy article, Haroon describes the CIA when he's dealing with them about, like, trying to not get charged with war crimes.
It's a little more complicated, though, because according to that New Yorker piece, in 2008, Eric had reached out to the CIA about a recent trip he'd taken to Lebanon.
And he'd received a reply from a guy named Wayne, who appeared to be operating a dummy email account.
Wayne did appear to act as a bit of a handler, and was trying to get Eric to spy on a local mosque.
But from all available information, it doesn't appear that that relationship...
Yeah.
It does seem like it explains why he would approach the CIA when he realized he'd gotten mixed up with a terrorist group, however, which is exactly what he did.
It makes a lot of sense for him to think that he'd got goodwill built up from interacting with this Wayne guy and trying to help him get information on this mosque, and that if he just went in and was upfront about the situation, they wouldn't charge him with the war crimes that it appeared he may have been involved in.
Whatever the case is about it, what motivated him, whatever the case is about whether or not he deserved to go to jail for his actions, those are issues I can't really settle for you or the world.
What I can say is that there's no credible reason to believe that Eric Haroon is an actor.
That's just a completely insane argument, but it fits very neatly with how Alex is beginning to incorporate actors in so many of his narratives.
Eric Haroon died in April 2014 of a drug overdose, which I'm going to guess Alex would say is actually just a globalist hit to take him out since he played his part in the grand deception and he wasn't useful anymore.
In reality, Eric had struggled with addiction his whole life, going to rehab for heroin in 2011 and being hospitalized for an overdose about four months before his death in December 2013 when he was found unresponsive on a bathroom floor.
It's hard not to imagine that the six months of solitary confinement he was subjected to, which ended in September 2013, Oh, do you mean something that the UN would describe as torture could play a role in a drug addict's death?
This is a tragic story of a complicated person who did some probably unwise things, possibly motivated by actually wanting to help oppressed people in Syria, possibly, but also motivated clearly by some vaguely anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist ideas.
No, not gun control over the people who are the source of liberty and justice and wherever firearms are found, evil is restrained, as Thomas Jefferson said.
Quote, the very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference.
We've gone over this before, but again, it's essential to point out that this isn't even a fake Thomas Jefferson quote.
This is a fake George Washington quote that traces back to an editorial in a hunting magazine from 1926.
It's essential to keep highlighting this, even if it is a running joke, because it shows how little Alex cares about the supposed history he claims to be an expert in.
He knows nothing about these founding fathers.
He's just memorized a few fake quotes from Patriot message boards that he pulls out whenever he needs to impress dullards.
So, on our last episode, we had the arrival of Steve Pchenik, and Steve made the argument that no kids died at Sandy Hook, there wasn't even a shooter, it didn't happen, it's all bullshit.
And that's why they're running around buying all the weapons they can while saying we shouldn't have weapons that we murdered the children at Sandy Hook, which was a clear false flag.
I also think if you listen to that clip, what you hear is a couple of examples of some of the arguments that Alex uses later in defense of the crisis actors, no one died there.
Guy caught in the woods, Bloomberg seemed to have advanced knowledge.
He has these narratives that he's putting forth, these pieces of information, these inconsistencies.
Which he will later blame on people like Wolfgang Helbig.
Fox drama, constitutionalist work for terrorist serial murderers.
Well, actually, they are serial terrorist murderers who are very impressed that they're constitutionalists because that's the dirtiest, nastiest thing on earth you can be.
And so everything is now Southern Poverty Law Center, ADL script, brainwashing the poor, hapless public.
And I just hope to point out to people that a free society does not have this type of full metal jacketed tyranny being sprayed out by the globalist media.
So Easter is one of the biggest holidays in the Christian religion, and here we have Alex not taking the day off.
To be with his family or go to services.
I don't say that to shame him.
I just want to point out this is how he celebrates and recognizes the day when Christians worldwide somberly reflect on how Jesus died for their sins and opened up a possibility of a new way of living free from the bondage of sin.
Some people have Easter egg hunts for the neighborhood kids.
Some people make a nice meal and commune with their loved ones.
And people like Alex get on a nationally syndicated radio program and complain about Fox drama shows.
The show that Alex is talking about here is the following.
So, at least it's an actual show that was on air, unlike other times he's complained about pilots that never got picked up as if they're like, oh, this is so bad.
I went and read the article on Infowars about this from Kurt Nimmo that Alex is reporting on, and it starts out weak.
Well, yeah, the article starts out way too strong, but it's also weak work.
Quote, Fox, the entertainment network founded by Rupert Murdoch and Barry Diller, is working with the federal government and the Southern Poverty Law Center in a concerted effort to demonize Americans identifying themselves as constitutionalists.
This is a devastatingly terrible lead paragraph, and any decent writer would never write this, and any website with an actual editor would never publish it, and here's why.
It's biting off way more than the article can chew.
That paragraph is explicitly saying that this article works We'll report that, one, the SPLC is working with Fox.
Two, the federal government is working with Fox.
Three, these groups are specifically working with Fox on issues related to content.
And four, the work they're doing is specifically to demonize constitutionalists.
Do you have any idea how much work that dum-dum Kurt Nimmo is going to have to do to actually make this article match that lead paragraph?
No, the article is mostly just a bunch of copy and paste snippets about the MIAC report and how AMC was trying to put a pilot of a comedy show on air called We Hate Paul Revere, and they don't mention that it just was never actually even a show.
It's just all that standard bullshit.
But the bigger issue here is that this isn't about the entire series.
It's just about one episode of the following.
And this gripe that he has, that Kurt Nemo has, is fucking hilarious.
Quote, in the above clip featured during InfoWars Night News on Thursday, two recruits are asked if they're ex-military.
They respond by saying they were raised in a militia and are, quote, constitutional extremists.
Two characters mention that they were constitutional extremists, and the response is to just lie and say that this is a gigantic SPLC, federal government-run plan to make people like Alex look bad?
These are the same people running around calling people snowflakes all the time for not putting up with racist and sexist bullying.
These are the same people who are into the free exchange of ideas and free speech absolutely.
And yet here, Alex is legitimately saying on his show that in a free society, a show like The Following wouldn't exist because it makes his extremist buddies feel bad.
Alex Jones told Infowars.com today that the violent patriot and constitutionalist narrative runs through numerous mainstream television shows.
Jones said his wife reports witnessing repeated instances of constitutionalists portrayed as violent criminals engaged in terrorist activity on hospital and police dramas.
The article is taking Alex as a primary source where he's saying that his wife has seen shows.
So, if you're keeping score, Alex is on his radio show, reporting on an article on Infowars.com, written by Kurt Nemo, that's sloppy as hell, and he is one of the primary experts that they consulted about what shows his wife watches.
So I started to listen to this episode, and I started to feel like this is so familiar.
I was like, I have heard this episode before.
And I knew for sure that I had heard it before when it got to Alex starting to tell a story about how over the weekend he got yelled at by a globalist in a hot tub.
And I realized that, like, all we mostly covered in that was The Globalist and the Hot Tub.
And there's more going on here.
So what I'm going to try and do is I'm going to look at the other stuff.
The Globalist and the Hot Tub stuff, that's in the other episode.
We will take a look at all of the other stuff that's important for our continuing investigation in 2013, but unfortunately will not involve The Globalist and the Hot Tub.
I don't think that that's an actual Thomas Jefferson quote, as I can find literally no evidence Jefferson ever said it.
Searching through sources ranging from quotation websites to Monticello's Jeffersonian archives, this doesn't appear in any recorded statement or speech given by Jefferson.
Granted, it doesn't sound too off-base for something Jefferson might believe, it's just that there's no evidence he did say it.
However, it does sound a lot like a boiled-down version of someone else's words.
Quote, Find out just what a people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them.
And these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows or with both.
The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.
This was said on August 4, 1857 by noted radical abolitionist Frederick Douglass.
This is wild to me, because obviously Alex likes the sentiment of this quote, but for some reason he doesn't know that he's reciting a quote specifically about the ending of slavery, which is something his family members literally fought to maintain.
I'm not speaking loosely or making assumptions here.
The next line of that speech are, quote, In the light of these ideas, Negroes will be hunted in the north and held and flogged in the south, so long as they submit to those devilish outrages and make no resistance, either moral or physical.
men may not get all they pay for in this world but they must certainly pay for all they get if we ever get freedom from the oppression and wrongs heaped upon us we must pay for their removal we will do this by labor by suffering by sacrifice and if need be by our lives and the lives Most of the time, Alex's fake Jefferson quotes are just kind of dumb.
They're examples of him seeing a meme on a Patriot message board and assuming it's real.
This case feels grosser.
As if what's going on is an attempt to steal Frederick Douglass' words and attribute them to someone it's cool with your audience to quote.
Maybe I'm reading too much into this, maybe more than I should, and maybe it's just Alex being stupid like usual.
But whatever the case, his streak of not knowing anything about his favorite subject in American history continues.
And then I'm talking to all these different former high-level people in government and current ones, and they tell me that they go to CFR meetings and they go to Pentagon meetings.
And most of the people there are listeners and are all upset about what's happening and they don't know what to do.
You don't know what to do?
You listen to my show and you're just, quote, glad I'm there?
Glad I'm here?
I'm going, hey, pirate ship, it's firing on us.
And you're all going, yeah, you're right.
Ben, Alex, you're great.
You recognize the pirate ship right as a cannonball takes off somebody's head.
I listen to this shit, this terrible show where it flies to legitimately on Easter.
Cover an article that you're the primary source for about 10 seconds in a Fox show where you allege that the SPLC and the federal government are running drama content.
You're running that kind of a joke of a fucking show.
unidentified
And you believe that world leaders are listening to this show.
So I found a top 100 list of video games based on sales from 2013.
And I'm not sure I'm seeing the same thing Alex has seen.
The top-selling game of 2013 was Grand Theft Auto V, and I could definitely see Alex taking issue with that game from a puritanical standpoint, but it definitely wasn't about training kids to tear out Patriots' teeth.
I mean, maybe one of the Fallout series could have some kind of, you know, there are some narratives in the Fallout games where it's like, look at where nationalist propaganda will get you.
I don't know enough video games to be able to, like, pinpoint what he's probably talking about.
But even if he proves that there's one game that's similar to what he's talking about, he still has failed to prove his thesis that it's all, like, there's so many of these games, it's all about it, it's in the culture.
You have ten seconds of an episode of the following you're complaining about.
Another one that I'm noticing quite a bit that troubles me more, maybe even, than his Sandy Hook shit is a lot of callers seem to be calling in, expressing alienation with the people around them because of Alex.
And we've seen him respond pretty badly to that in past episodes.
Well, I mean, you know, that is sort of indicative of Stockholm Syndrome, named after Stockholm Europe.
Yes, absolutely.
That is...
It does seem like there is a piece of it where it is very possible to interpret...
Like, as long as you have the veneer of martyrdom to whatever people are doing to you, it is still possible for someone to destroy your life and you still see it as a positive.
If you get a bunch of calls from people who are saying, like, what you have made me believe has really made it so no one can communicate anymore, you should take a look in the mirror.
One of the reasons you and I get along so well, and I do respect you, is number one, you do talk about the truth, but I can understand why you're feeling depressed.
I think if you are somebody who has a good amount of training in the field, you probably recognize little cues in the way Alex is behaving and provide stimulus that leads him in the direction that you want him to go.
And I'll say, on our last episode, his big piece of evidence that Sandy Hook, no one died there, was that Susan Collins, the writer of The Hunger Games, is from the city of Newtown.
But what happened, and this is why I'm very impressed, Alex, and I think your audience should be impressed, what happened is that because the defense lawyers did not do well, and they broke what we call a gag order, the same way the President of the United States broke the gag order on Sandy Hook, which he should never have done if in fact there was a killing, but there was no killing at Sandy Hook, the president would have been indicted for a federal offense of the gag order.
So what happened in Aurora is not only an indictment of the criminal James Holmes, it's an indictment of the false flag of Sandy Hook.
And that was literally where the president took his ground and he put a line in the sand and said, this is where I stand.
These poor kids were never killed.
They were never present.
And he created a total absurd scenario, which made no sense, had no credibility, was inconsistent.
He used all these female executives who'd been in Texas in your area, Mr. Gene Rosen, Susan Collins, who wrote 100 games, and there's, what, 600 million who wrote this type of scenario.
This is the beginning of the end of the false flags for FEMA, for CIA and others.
But my issue is, specifically, as being somebody who has basically covered false flags and worked in the government, as an expert on this, what you're seeing that tells you that no one was killed.
Because in my experience, when I do false flags, why not kill some kids?
So that seems to be, like I said earlier, the biggest stumbling block that he has is like, why?
So it appears that someone like Steve is pretty fucking smart and manipulative.
If he's able to come up with a compelling reason for Alex to believe it would be easier for them to not kill, even though they love to kill and have fun doing it, then that would resolve any of the rebuttals that Alex is putting forth.
All right, I was talking to Dr. Steve Pechenik during the break, and I was asking him specifically...
Why he thinks Sandy Hook had evidence of being a false flag, and I'd like him now to repeat that information to you.
Then I want to look at the geopolitical ramifications from his geopolitical perspective and his contacts on what's really happening in the world right now from Cyprus to North Korea and China.
And he's also worked in the financial sector, so he can comment on that.
So, Doc, what is your take on Sandy Hook?
Is it just all the clear scripting and how they were ready minute one, and now it's come out that Bloomberg was ready months before?
And then all the people that look and act like actors.
And literally, it comes out of her script, the assassination of children in schools, assassination of children in a dystopic society, the fact that she had no comments, the fact that this almost came out of her own books on children in war.
And secondly, you had a whole group of actors, Jean Rosen, who came out of the Crisis Actors Group.
I always referred my readers to IS42, Social Media Emergency Management, the official course launched in summer by Emergency Management Institute, which you and I pay for.
It has how the public proceeds, community, key organization.
In other words, there's a whole school on how to create disasters, and these children are also taught how to create disasters.
Gene Rosen was not only not a psychologist, but he was also president in Fannie Hook as a FEMA advisor and also in Texas.
Plus, you had kids who were...
in the various acting schools before.
You also had the front line ENT people like Vengelly, Flynn, Penn, Frank, Chapman, It was written about in the New York Times and gracefully in the New York Times that kind of implied these were absurd.
These were Irish cops who I haven't been known in Connecticut because I worked at Greenwich, Connecticut, so I know San Diego very well.
It's a white, very wealthy community filled with guns and alcohol, but there is no evidence of a murder or a killing, and in fact what you add is a violation of a gag order, which is a prosecutorial evidence, and everyone violated the gag order in contrast to.
Aurora, where the president respected it, the prosecutors respected the defense attorney, and here you had a scripted story about some kid who had Asperger's, by the way, which is not a psychiatric disease.
disorder, which does not have any history other than the fact that he had guns and his mother gave him guns and alcohol.
Absolutely absurd, inconsistent, irrelevant, and very dangerous for us.
So that's kind of indicative, too, of his depression that he's in in this episode, that those long pauses and trying to process this stuff, he's not operating well.
All that needs to be resolved for Alex to take up the theory that these kids didn't get killed are someone explaining to him that in a controlled environment they can do this much better.
They don't have to worry about it going wrong if they're not actually killing people.
They can stage everything.
That's super easy for Steve to do.
And then it's easy for him to resolve this other lingering concern about Aurora.
Like Steve can just be like, alright, yes, that was fake too.
Yeah, I mean, what you see, I think, at least what I see from all of my experience of Alex's psychology and how he comports himself, how he covers stuff, he's on the edge.
He's teetering on the edge, and all it takes is resolving a couple tiny little thoughts that he has in order for him to get on board.
I think he's so primed.
And now that you have a fucking psych warfare guy involved, you're just asking for it.
Because he doesn't know how to work with Alex's psychology.
Steve does.
Steve knows that what you need to do is put sugar around the pill.
You need to sweeten Alex up with compliments, flattery, evoking your history together of like, yeah, we get into conversations, we fight sometimes because we respect each other.
You need to frame any possible disagreement as just like, well, we're both really smart.
I think when I said anybody could push him over the edge, I think what I meant was any policy walk could, if they put their minds to it, they could take the lessons learned from this show and convince Alex of some bullshit.
I think the Northern Invasion part was pretty clear where your sympathies lie if you say that Abraham Lincoln was a tyrant and John Wilkes Booth was right on.
And so what I think based on that is that it might be a good use of our time for our next episode to forego going back to the present day and checking in on whatever dumb shit Alex is saying in 2019 and possibly taking a closer look.
At some of the things that Steve Pchenik has been involved in.
So I guess, in effect, because on Monday's episode we stumbled into Steve Pachanek showing up in the past, and then on this episode we see he comes back a couple days later and is very clearly putting forth an aggressive Sandy Hook, no one died there argument.