In Knowledge Fight’s #339, Dan Friesen and Jordan Holmes dissect Alex Jones’ March 29–April 1, 2013 broadcasts, where he falsely claimed Kim Jong-un targeted Austin, misrepresented Eric Haroun’s Syria arrest as a CIA "crisis actor" stunt, and peddled debunked conspiracy theories like Sandy Hook being a false flag—backed by Steve Pieczenik’s manipulative, Confederate-sympathizing rhetoric. His April Fool’s gun control endorsement, baseless torture claims in video games, and Fox drama smear further exposed his pattern of self-aggrandizement and misinformation, reinforcing how his conspiracy-laden narratives isolate followers while dismissing real-world harm. [Automatically generated summary]
So, Jordan, today we got a fun episode of Alex Jones to go over.
I do not really particularly care right now about the present day.
I may get back to it for Friday.
I'm not entirely sure.
Might do an episode about it then.
But based on our Monday episode where we discovered the arrival of Steve Pieczenik back in 2013, coming in hot, throwing Sandy Hook crisis actor talk all over the place, I realized, like, I've got to stick around here.
And before we get to that, though, all the confusing and fun and informative and frustrating things, I'd like to say thank you to some people who have signed up and allow us to create that frustrating and informative thing.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I like what these dudes do, you can support our show if you'd like to by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show.
So what that's about is that he was driving into work that day, and a piece of plastic came off of a truck and apparently blocked his windshield for a while.
And I just had this weird thought when I was talking about because you know we make fun of him a lot and it's viral and people see it all over the world that he's probably watching the show.
You will die someday, you little coward.
Just like your degenerate father and his degenerate mass murdering father.
Okay.
You little piece of trash.
And of course, Austin's such a military target.
I got a gut feeling that the little turd watches this show, and that's good.
So the leader of North Korea is going to bomb a United States city solely to get rid of Alex Jones, which will almost immediately end his country's existence.
So Alex is responding to a post on NK News, North Korea News, with the headline, quote, North Korean photo reveals U.S. mainland strike plan.
I've read this article, and I have to say that from the blurriness of the photo that's included, I don't even think it's a fair assessment to say that Austin is even one of the targets.
There is a line on the map, supposedly a missile path, which appears to end in central Texas.
But the problem is it's unclear if the path itself stops there or if that's just where the picture of the U.S. map is blocked by one of the North Korean soldiers' hats.
It's a problem.
Because of this unclear image, even the NK News article said, quote, a composite overlay appears to show San Diego, Washington, D.C., Hawaii, and possibly Austin as being primary targets in a North Korean attack plan.
They had to make a composite overlay where they superimposed the map over the soldier's hat and then guessed where that line ended.
His hat also covered the entire southeastern United States.
That line could have ended anywhere.
But it's probably Austin because Alex has been talking shit about Kim Jong-un.
The other thing that's important to point out is that this image was not information that North Korea released to the world to threaten people.
It was published in NK News after they found an image in Rodong, the newspaper of the Korea Workers' Party.
The folks at NK News believe that this is indicative that the message was intended for an internal North Korean audience, not the world.
John Swenson Wright, senior lecturer in East Asian international relations at the University of Cambridge, said to NK News, It seems reasonable to suppose that the target map is designed for home consumption and to create an impression of war readiness for the DPRK citizens that is part of a wider policy of strengthening national resolve.
This was a piece of propaganda meant for an internal audience, for a dictator to both scare and reassure his people.
It's so wild to me how Alex can take something like that, give it half a second's look, and decide that the real story here is about himself.
There's no evidence that Austin was even one of their targets, but Alex sees that shit, and his immediate angle is: Kim Jong-un must listen to the show.
This is deeply troubling because the only two explanations I can see are outrageous levels of narcissism to the point where he actually believes that Un listens to his show and is gunning for him.
Right.
Or an almost unbelievable level of comfort knowing he can say something that stupid and his audience will just believe it.
Or like it'll be, it's to me, so much of this has to be like water off a duck's back for so many of his listeners, where it's like, it's almost like they stroke out unless something applies directly to them in the same way that Alex can't pay attention to anything without applying it directly to himself.
Like he says all this narcissistic shit and his listeners are like, okay, all right, back.
So your experience of listening to him, even if you don't take that in and fully internalize it as like something important, it still gives the appearance that like, well, I mean, dictators want to take Alex out.
So we have another guy who's an actor in Alex's mind.
So who he's talking about is a guy named Eric Haroun, who is an American citizen who was arrested in a very complicated situation back in 2013.
There's a version that Alex is putting forth, which is that he was an American soldier who decided to start saying Al-Qaeda was great, most likely because he's a paid actor, and then the government had to stage an arrest to cover things up or something.
Obviously, the globalists paid him to pretend to support Al-Qaeda because he's part of a larger psyop to make you think that white people can do bad things like terrorism, which Alex would tell you is impossible.
Beyond that, just kind of being a dumb conception, his version of this story is painfully oversimplified.
Haroon had been in the army, but had some bad behavioral issues when he was enlisted.
According to the New Yorker, a fellow soldier who served with him said that he was, quote, about a week away from receiving a full-blown dishonorable discharge, which was averted when he was a passenger in a drunk driving crash, which led to him suffering from a skull fracture.
He got a medical waiver and an honorable discharge, thus ending his formal fighting career in the U.S. services.
In the years that followed, the New Yorker paints a picture of a really fucked up guy discussing his stalking an ex-girlfriend, which ultimately led to him shooting himself in the abdomen when she wouldn't take him back.
The article also says he was arrested twice for DUI and just had a real troubled path that led to him going overseas and staying in hostels and meeting people and getting interested in freedom fighting.
In all the interviews I've read, including a pretty in-depth piece in foreign policy, it's abundantly clear that Eric Haroun was not an al-Qaeda sympathizer.
He was a committed anti-Zionist who joined up with rebels in Syria because he wanted to help overthrow Assad.
And in the process, he allegedly accidentally got mixed up with Jabbat al-Nusra.
He had joined up with a separate group that was ostensibly aligned with the United States.
But after a skirmish in the ensuing chaos, he got a ride in an al-Nusra truck away from the fighting.
And he ended up embedded with them for about 25 days, which you could kind of believe is a mistake, considering that Haroun didn't know Arabic.
Due to his linguistic confusion, there's even some doubt that he was actually ever even with Al-Nusra, as opposed to the possibility he was with a group like al-Nasar, and he just didn't know the difference.
When his father says that he was working with the CIA, as Alex discusses, it most likely doesn't mean that he was in Syria because he was working with the CIA, but that he was negotiating with the CIA to be able to return to the United States.
In the foreign policy article, Haroun describes the CIA when he's dealing with them about trying to not get charged with war crimes, terrorism and war crimes.
It's a little more complicated, though, because according to that New Yorker piece, in 2008, Eric had reached out to the CIA about a recent trip he'd taken to Lebanon.
And he'd received a reply from a guy named Wayne, who appeared to be operating a dummy email account.
Wayne did appear to act as a bit of a handler and was trying to get Eric to spy on a local mosque.
But from all available information, it doesn't appear that that relationship continued, nor did it have anything to do with Eric's later adventurism in the Middle East.
It does seem like it explains why he would approach the CIA when he realized he'd gotten mixed up with a terrorist group, however, which is exactly what he did.
It makes a lot of sense for him to think that he'd got goodwill built up from interacting with this Wayne guy and trying to help him get information on this mosque, and that if he just went in and was upfront about the situation, they wouldn't charge him with the war crimes that it appeared he may have been involved in.
Whatever the case is about it, what motivated him, whatever the case is about whether or not he deserved to go to jail for his actions, those are issues I can't really settle for you or the world.
What I can say is that there's no credible reason to believe that Eric Haroun is an actor.
That's just a completely insane argument, but it fits very neatly with how Alex is beginning to incorporate actors in so many of his narratives.
Eric Haroon died in April 2014 of a drug overdose, which I'm going to guess Alex would say is actually just a globalist hit to take him out since he played his part in the Grand Deception and he wasn't useful anymore.
In reality, Eric had struggled with addiction his whole life, going to rehab for heroin in 2011 and being hospitalized for an overdose about four months before his death in December 2013 when he was found unresponsive on a bathroom floor.
It's hard not to imagine that the six months of solitary confinement he was subjected to, which ended in September 2013, could have played a role in his relapse and eventual death.
This is a tragic story of a complicated person who did some probably unwise things, possibly motivated by actually wanting to help oppressed people in Syria.
It's entirely possible that he slapsticked his way into the Taliban, you know, or al-Qaeda, that kind of thing, where he's just like, oh, this dude's offering me a ride.
And again, that's a reference to the quote: quote, the very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference.
We've gone over this before, but again, it's essential to point out that this isn't even a fake Thomas Jefferson quote.
This is a fake George Washington quote that traces back to an editorial in a hunting magazine from 1926.
It's essential to keep highlighting this, even if it is a running joke, because it shows how little Alex cares about the supposed history he claims to be an expert in.
And that's why they're running around buying all the weapons they can while saying we shouldn't have weapons, that we murdered the children at Sandy Hook, which was a clear false flag.
I also think if you listen to that clip, what you hear is a couple of examples of some of the arguments that Alex uses later in defense of the crisis actors No One Died There.
Guy Caught in the Woods, Bloomberg seemed to have advanced knowledge.
He has these narratives that he's putting forth, these pieces of information, these inconsistencies, which he will later blame on people like Wolfgang Helbig.
Fox drama, constitutionalist work for terrorist serial murders.
Well, actually, they are serial terrorist murders who are very impressed that they're constitutionalists because that's the dirtiest, nastiest thing on earth.
You can be.
It brings a big smile to the chief killer's face.
And so everything is now a Southern Poverty Law Center ADL script brainwashing the poor, hapless public.
And I just hope to point out to people that a free society does not have this type of full metal jacketed tyranny being sprayed out by the globalist media.
So Easter is one of the biggest holidays in the Christian religion.
And here we have Alex not taking the day off to be with his family or go to services.
I don't say that to shame him.
I just want to point out this is how he celebrates and recognizes the day when Christians worldwide somberly reflect on how Jesus died for their sins and opened up a possibility of a new way of living, free from the bondage of sin.
Some people have Easter egg hunts for the neighborhood kids.
Some people make a nice meal and commune with their loved ones.
And people like Alex get on a nationally syndicated radio program and complain about Fox drama shows.
The show that Alex is talking about here is the following.
So at least it's an actual show that was on air, unlike other times he's complained about pilots that never got picked up as if they're like, oh, this is so bad.
I went and read the article on InfoWars about this from Kurt Nimmo that Alex is reporting on, and it starts out weak.
Or actually, it starts out too strong, I would say.
Well, yeah, the article starts out way too strong, but it's also weak work.
Quote, Fox, the entertainment network founded by Rupert Murdoch and Barry Diller, is working with the federal government and the Southern Poverty Law Center in a concerted effort to demonize Americans identifying themselves as constitutionalists.
No, the article is mostly just a bunch of copy and paste snippets about the MIAC report and how AMC was trying to put a pilot of a comedy show on air called We Hate Paul Revere.
And they don't mention that it just was never actually even a show.
It's just all that standard bullshit.
But the bigger issue here is that this isn't about the entire series.
It's just about one episode of the following.
And this gripe that he has, that Kurt Nemo has, is fucking hilarious.
Quote, in the above clip featured during InfoWars Night News on Thursday, two recruits are asked if they're ex-military.
They respond by saying they were raised in a militia and are, quote, constitutional extremists.
First, you got the name of their own show wrong.
It's the Infowars nightly news, and no editor caught that.
Two characters mentioned that they were constitutional extremists, and the response is to just lie and say that this is a gigantic SPLC federal government-run plan to make people like Alex look bad.
These are the same people running around calling people snowflakes all the time for not putting up with racist and sexist bullying.
These are the same people who are into the free exchange of ideas and free speech absolutists.
And yet, here, Alex is legitimately saying on his show that in a free society, a show like the following wouldn't exist because it makes his extremist buddies feel bad.
Oh, no, it's the shitty, it's a shittier version of the 24-hour Fox Machine where the morning show has a guest on and they say, oh, I think that Obama's.
And then the evening news is like, some people are saying that Obama is.
Quote: Alex Jones told Infowars.com today that the violent patriot and constitutionalist narrative runs through numerous mainstream television shows.
Jones said his wife reports witnessing repeated instances of constitutionalists portrayed as violent criminals engaged in terrorist activity on hospital and police dramas.
Where he's saying that his wife has no I don't have time to watch TV, but my wife tells me that constitutionalists really look bad all the time, so I'm just going to take that as truth.
So if you're keeping score, Alex is on his radio show reporting on an article on Infowars.com written by Kurt Nemo that's sloppy as hell, and he is one of the primary experts that they consulted about what shows his wife watches.
So what happened was he recorded that on Friday, and he didn't know what special guest they were going to replay, what interview they were going to replay.
And so he teased that, and they just recorded that like five minutes on Friday or whatever, and then he took the weekend off.
So I started to listen to this episode, and I started to feel like this is so familiar.
I was like, I have heard this episode before, and I knew for sure that I had heard it before when it got to Alex starting to tell a story about how over the weekend he got yelled at by a globalist in a hot tub.
What I did was, in my preparation for it, I went back and I listened to every April Fool's Day because I thought that maybe Alex would do a joke show or something.
And so I heard this.
We didn't use it for the live show, but the next episode after that, I had found the Globalist in a Hot Tub story.
So if you want, you can go back and listen to our April 1st and 2nd episode, where it's mostly about Alex running into an authoritarian globalist who is into white genocide.
Yep.
Who yells at Alex in a hot tub.
Apparently, this dude points at Alex for 20 minutes.
I went back and I listened to that episode, and I realized that, like, all we mostly covered in that was the Globalist in the Hot Tub.
And there's more going on here.
So what I'm going to try and do is I'm going to look at the other stuff.
The Globalist and a Hot Tub stuff, that's in the other episode.
We will take a look at all of the other stuff that's important for our continuing investigation in 2013, but unfortunately will not involve the Globalist in a Hot Tub.
I don't think that that's an actual Thomas Jefferson quote, as I can find literally no evidence Jefferson ever said it.
Searching through sources ranging from quotation websites to Moticello's Jeffersonian archives, this doesn't appear in any recorded statement or speech given by Jefferson.
Granted, it doesn't sound too off-base for something Jefferson might believe.
It's just that there's no evidence he did say it.
However, it does sound a lot like a boiled-down version of someone else's words.
Quote, find out just what a people will submit to, and you've found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them.
And these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows or with both.
The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.
This was said on August 4th, 1857, by noted radical abolitionist Frederick Douglass.
This is wild to me because obviously Alex likes the sentiment of this quote, but for some reason he doesn't know that he's reciting a quote specifically about the ending of slavery, which is something his family members literally fought to maintain.
I'm not speaking loosely or making assumptions here.
The next line of that speech are, quote, in the light of these ideas, Negroes will be hunted in the North and held and flogged in the South so long as they submit to those devilish outrages and make no resistance, either moral or physical.
Men may not get all they pay for in this world, but they must certainly pay for all they get.
If we ever get freedom from the oppression and wrongs heaped upon us, we must pay for their removal.
We will do this by labor, by suffering, by sacrifice, and if need be, by our lives and the lives of others.
Most of the time, Alex's fake Jefferson quotes are just kind of dumb.
They're examples of him seeing a meme on a Patriot message board and assuming it's real.
This case feels grosser, as if what's going on is an attempt to steal Frederick Douglass's words and attribute them to someone it's cool with your audience to quote.
Maybe I'm reading too much into this, maybe more than I should.
And maybe it's just Alex being stupid like usual.
But whatever the case, his streak of not knowing anything about his favorite subject in American history continues.
And then I'm talking to all these different former high-level people in government and current ones, and they tell me that they go to CFR meetings and they go to Pentagon meetings.
And most of the people there are listeners and are all upset about what's happening and they don't know what to do.
You don't know what to do?
You listen to my show and you're just, quote, glad I'm there?
Glad I'm here?
I'm going, hey, pirate ship, it's firing on us.
And you're all going, yeah, you're right.
Ben, Alex, you're great.
You recognize the pirate ship right as a cannonball takes off somebody's head.
I listened to this shit, this terrible show where it flies to legitimately on Easter cover an article that you're the primary source for about 10 seconds in a Fox show where you allege that the SPLC and the federal government are running drama content.
You're running that kind of a joke of a fucking show.
And you believe that world leaders get the fuck off.
This is Alex being dumb and old, but also knowing that his audience is gullible and old.
When I hear a guy say that all the top video games are about teaching kids to torture patriots, all I really hear is a guy indicating that he knows that his demographics don't include people under 40.
The more I think about it, the more I think there's a very good chance that Alex would have been the sort of guy back in the day who would have been like, there's satanic messages hidden in rock and roll.
I mean, maybe one of the Fallout series could have some kind of, you know, there are some narratives in the Fallout games where it's like, look at where nationalist propaganda will get you.
I don't know enough video games to be able to pinpoint what he's probably talking about.
But even if he proves that there's one game that's similar to what he's talking about, he still has failed to prove his thesis that it's all like, there's so many of these games.
It's all about it.
It's in the culture.
You have 10 seconds of an episode of the following you're complaining about.
As we go through this stretch of time, we're noticing a lot of different trends.
One of them is the heightened prevalence of Alex saying that things are actors.
Another one that I'm noticing quite a bit that troubles me more, maybe even than his Sandy Hook shit, is a lot of callers seem to be calling in, expressing alienation with the people around them because of Alex.
And we've seen him respond pretty badly to that in past episodes.
That is, it does seem like there is a piece of it where it is very possible to interpret, like, as long as you have the veneer of martyrdom to whatever people are doing to you, it is still possible for someone to destroy your life and you still see it as a positive.
So earlier, I heard Alex say that all these high-level government people are listening to his show, and I believed that it was Steve who was telling him that.
So like I said, Alex is coming off this globalist in a hot tub situation.
And he's pretty depressed about it because this guy, you know, he really shook him to the point where he was having nightmares.
And Alex is really depressed.
And that's not good because Steve Pieczenik, for whatever crazy he is, for however much he is probably exaggerating a lot of his resume, he definitely is someone who understands psychology.
I think if you are somebody who has a good amount of training in the field, you probably recognize little cues in the way Alex is behaving and provide stimulus that leads him in the direction that you want him to go.
And I'll say, on our last episode, his big piece of evidence that Sandy Hook no one died there was that Susan Collins, the writer of the Hunger Games, is from the city of Newtown.
In this episode, he starts off with a slightly different approach, and that is to express that.
Let me see if I can explain this because it's dumb.
But what happened, and this is why I'm very impressed, Alex, and I think your audience should be impressed.
What happened is that because the defense lawyers did not do well, and they broke what we call a gag order, the same way the president of the United States broke a gag order on Sandy Hook, which he should never have done if, in fact, there was a killing, but there was no killing at Sandy Hook, the president would have been indicted for a federal offense of the gag order.
So what happened in Aurora is not only an indictment of the criminal Case Holmes, it's an indictment of the false flag of Sandy Hook.
So for me, this is a very important day that your audience has to understand.
Well, let's limit it just to Sandy Hook because that's very important.
That was literally where the president took his ground and made it a, he put a line in the sand and said, this is where I stand.
These poor kids who were never killed, who were never present.
And he created a total absurd scenario which made no sense, had no credibility, was inconsistent, used all these theme executives who've been in Texas, in your area, Mr. Gene Rosen, Susan Collins, who wrote 100 games and is worth 600 million, who wrote this type of scenario.
This is the beginning of the end of the false flags, the theme of the CIA and others.
But my issue is specifically, as being somebody who has basically covered false flags and worked in the government as an expert on this, what you're saying that tells you that no one was killed.
Because in my experience, if I do false flags, why not kill some kids?
So that seems to be, like I said earlier, the biggest stumbling block that he has is like, why?
So it appears that someone like Steve is pretty fucking smart and manipulative if he's able to come up with a compelling reason for Alex to believe it would be easier for them to not kill, even though they love to kill and have fun doing it, then that would resolve any of the rebuttals that Alex is putting forth.
And he allows Steve to hold court for long stretches of time and talk about how the base of America is entrepreneurship.
It's just like pontificating about a whole bunch of nonsensical ideas.
But there are ideas that Alex really is into.
There is a lot of packaging his argument about Sandy Hook with a lot of window dressing about the return of small business, the end of the era of false flaggery.
I was talking to Dr. Steve Pachinik during the break, and I was asking him specifically why he thinks Sandy Hook had evidence of being a false flag, and I'd like him now to repeat that information to you.
Then I want to look at the geopolitical ramifications from his geopolitical perspective and his context on what's really happening in the world right now from Cyprus to North Korea and China.
And he's also worked in the financial sector, so you can comment on that.
So, Doc, what is your take on Sandy Hook?
Is it just all the clear scripting and how they were ready minute one, and now it's come out that Bloomberg was ready months before, and then all the people that look and act like actors?
She's written all the Hunger Game movies and the Hunger Game Good books.
And literally, it comes out of her script.
The assassination of children in schools, assassination of children in a dystopic society, the fact that she had no comments, the fact that this almost came out of her own books on children in war.
And secondly, you had a whole group of actors, Gene Rosen, who came out of the Crisis Actors Group.
I always referred my readers to IS42 Social Media Emergency Management, the official course launched in summer by Emergency Management Institute, which you and I pay for.
It has how the public proceeds, community, key organizational.
In other words, there's a whole school on how to create disasters.
And these children are also taught how to create disasters.
Gene Rosen was not only not a psychologist, but he was also president in Sandy Hook as a theme advisor, and also in Texas.
Plus, you have kids who were in the various acting schools before.
You also had the frontline ENCODE people like Vengeli, Flynn, Penn, Frank, Chapman, who were written about in the New York Times, and gracefully in the New York Times, it kind of implied these were absurd.
These were Irish cops who I haven't known in Connecticut because I worked at Greenwich, Connecticut, so I know Sandy Hook very well.
It's a white, very wealthy community filled with guns and alcohol.
But there is no evidence of a murder or a killing.
And in fact, what you had is a violation of a gag order, which is the prosecutorial evidence.
And everyone violated the gag order in contrast to Aurora, where the president respected it, the prosecutors respected defense attorney.
And here you had a scripted story about some kid who had Asperger's, by the way, which is not a psychiatric disorder, which does not have to be the killing, which did not have any history other than the fact that he had guns and his mother gave him guns and alcohol.
Absolutely absurd, inconsistent, irrelevant, and very dangerous for us to do.
And when he starts talking about Sandy Hook seeing all the signs that it was totally staged, it just blows me away because, you know, I can't prove it either way.
There's a lot of suspicious signs there and a lot of issues, but I also see that on the Aurora front.
I just know this.
They know that guns have made violent crime go down 49%.
So that's kind of indicative, too, of his depression that he's in in this episode, that those long pauses and trying to process this stuff.
He's not operating well.
All that needs to be resolved for Alex to take up the theory that these kids didn't get killed are someone explaining to him that in a controlled environment they can do this much better.
They don't have to worry about it going wrong if they're not actually killing people.
They can stage everything.
That's super easy for Steve to do.
And then it's easy for him to resolve this other lingering concern about Aurora.
Like Steve could just be like, all right, yes, that was fake too.
Yeah, I mean, what you see, I think, at least what I see from all of my experience of Alex's psychology and how he comports himself, how he covers stuff.
He's on the edge.
He's teetering on the edge.
And all it takes is resolving a couple tiny little thoughts that he has in order for him to get on board.
I think he's so primed.
And now that you have a fucking psych warfare guy involved, you're just asking for it.
Because he doesn't know how to work with Alex's psychology.
Steve does.
Steve knows that what you need to do is put sugar around the pill.
You need to sweeten Alex up with compliments, flattery, evoking your history together of like, yeah, we get into conversations, we fight sometimes, and it's because we respect each other.
You need to frame any possible disagreement as just like, well, we're both really smart.
You know, when you're talking about a sculptor, the statue is already there.
I'm just breaking away the marble, man.
That's what's going on.
I think when I said anybody could push him over the edge, I think what I meant was any policy walk could, if they put their minds to it, they could take the lessons learned from this show and convince Alex of some bullshit.
So we only have a couple clips left here, and it's just some indications that Steve is not a good dude.
I think that when you see the, obviously, Steve Pieczenik is somebody who's up to no good and is meddling in Alex's life for whatever reason he has.
But there's also things outside of even just convincing him that no one died at Sandy Hook, convincing him that the Las Vegas shooting was a false flag or whatever the fuck.
So what I come away from this with is I am more convinced than ever that Alex is being softly led down this path to Sandy Hook denialism by Dr. Steve Booth.
And so what I think based on that is that it might be a good use of our time for our next episode to forego going back to the present day and checking in on whatever dumb shit Alex is saying in 2019 and possibly taking a closer look at some of the things that Steve Pieczenik has been involved in.
So I guess, in effect, because on Monday's episode, we stumbled into Steve Pieczenik showing up in the past.
And then on this episode, we see he comes back a couple days later and is very clearly putting forth an aggressive Sandy Hook No One Died There argument.
So, what you do, you go there, you order two drinks, even though there are four people sitting around the table.
Only order two drinks.
That's the symbol.
That's the not symbol, the signal.
Then the waiter is going to come out, bring to you a small drive, one of those stick drives, hand it to you, put it on the table, walk away, leave the restaurant, don't pay for a goddamn thing.