In the Knowledge Fight episode covering Alex Jones’ February 6–8, 2013 broadcasts, Jones weaponizes a Wired article on cosmic rays to push his "God as programmer" simulation theory, ignoring scientific skepticism. He boasts of GCN’s inflated radio reach while promoting a militarized "Come and Take It" shirt, then pivots to the Christopher Dorner shooting spree, accepting it despite the shooter’s left-leaning views clashing with Jones’ usual conspiracies. Mocking Carl Rove as a "Twinkie" 80 feet long, he later shifts tone on an asteroid warning, exposing erratic, self-serving patterns. Dan Friesen and Jordan Holmes critique his performative outrage, political contradictions, and potential role in inciting violence through unhinged rhetoric. [Automatically generated summary]
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I like this show, I'd like to support what these guys do, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com.
Her and Caitlin Bennett are both going out to, like, Pride events and trying to trick people into signing petitions where, like, Trump supporters go to concentration camps.
Major scientific institutions have come out, and they've cross-referenced each other's research, and it appears that...
Light waves and other matter is in some type of ordered format that appears to be coded, coded, and appears to be a simulation.
That's why so many top scientists who were atheists got into the 96% of the DNA, and we've done reports on this, that they thought was junk and found all the coding in there and got religion very, very quickly.
It is a simulation of the mind of God, but we are creations with free will made in the image of God.
And imagine, we are genetic expressions but endowed with a spirit by God.
Who are able to then decipher the coding, we've now gotten to that point where the scientists are saying there is no God, and they're deciphering the coding and going, this whole thing's a simulation.
It shouldn't surprise us, though, at all, the idea that Alex has figured out that some people believe the world is a simulation and that he's turned it into proof of his version of God.
I'm not really sure why he's bringing it up now, because most of the stuff he's talking about is from an article that came out in Wired.
So even this is months old stuff.
And that article was discussing some recent research into cosmic ray particles.
The researchers studying the particles found that they had a limit to how much energy these particles can have.
And that limit appeared to be arbitrary, which the article presents as possibly representing evidence of built-in limits in the physical universe that are part of the parameters that we're a simulation within.
So it also points out, quote, it could be, though, that we're incorrectly interpreting evidence of certain fundamental laws that we are as yet unfamiliar with.
It's really fun to imagine that we live in a computer simulation and the matrix is real, but more measured analysis has to include the possibility that we just don't know anything about the things we're studying yet.
Scientists often include this restraint, but it's a real deep human tendency to take something that could be suggesting some new finding of science and act like your interpretation is supported by the scientists'work.
When I hear Alex talking about the This article, that's all I really hear.
He wants to believe the world is some kind of a simulation.
So he takes this article as mainstream proof that it definitely is, intentionally ignoring the part about how it's totally possible these are just rules of cosmic particles that we don't understand.
Scientists and research firms and universities have done huge computer Computer breakdowns on cosmic rays, light rays, you name it, and are finding the same signature of encoding or that it is a simulation.
The DNA has it in there.
They found out it's not 96% junk.
It is an incredible crystalline antenna system with DNA sequences of all sorts of other...
Life forms in it, and that's why so many people that are atheists, and what does atheist mean?
It just means you're closed-minded.
And you're sick of seeing fake preachers up there with limited spectrums or fake religions trying to interpret the true spirituality of the universe, which just means we are aware of things being much larger and that we don't have all the answers.
And some Bible-thumping Christians will say, what?
You're not subscribing to some Southern Baptist interpretation?
I'm a radio talk show host who happens to have a relationship with God through Jesus Christ.
But the issue here is, if you didn't beat people over the head, they would become spiritual, which is the first step in awakening.
One of the quickest ways to awaken.
You can wake people up politically, and then...
They tend to wake up spiritually, and that's really my goal.
I didn't do that on purpose, but now I'm a little bit more wise than I used to be and understand why God has used me as a tool.
Well, I believe one example of him losing the thread is basically what he said is that atheists watched all those bad preachers and were like, there's probably no God.
They just don't know that our DNA is a crystalline transmitting machine.
And if they knew that, then we would never have atheists anymore.
I'm not entirely sure what he means by a crystalline network of antennae, but I did hear him say that there's other life forms, which leads me to believe he thinks there's alien DNA that's mixed in with our DNA, which is...
So, in this next clip, he talks a little bit more about that, and I really think that you can get some strong indications that all he's really interested in in this simulation theory narrative is using it as a jump-off point to preach his version of Christianity.
unidentified
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Science is increasingly showing that it is the case that we're probably living inside an artificial...
Well, the universe was void, and then God spoke it, thought it, and it was made.
And that's what they find in every discipline now, is that it's designed, and the human word computer isn't even proper in all of this.
There is a governing structure.
They can see the modulation.
And off of the projection of the time-space continuum, off of just one of the readings, these cosmic rays, they continue to see particles that should be flowing at different rates and modulations with an overall modulation, and they can tune it and begin to see the structure of the containment system.
And it's contained within the thought process of the creator, of God, of the great architect, as the Illuminati calls it, but that's actually a biblical term, which they've stolen.
And so it is the construction, and what does the creator tell us?
You are made in my...
You are creators as well, but small creators.
And so it is literally the consciousness and the will of God creating all of this, but then giving us free will, which is then flowing forth a whole new level of creation.
By his own count, he's only on like 200 radio stations at this point.
We know that he offers completely free syndication.
So why would those 1,100 other stations not air the most popular show on the network if it costs them nothing?
The oldest snapshot you can find on the Wayback Machine of the GCN affiliate list is from October 14, 2014, and the number they're claiming is substantially smaller than the one Alex is claiming.
They allege to be working with 641 radio stations, of which Alex is on 100.
Weirdly, still consistent with that one-sixth number.
Fun trivia, Joel Wallach, the veterinarian who pretends to be a human doctor, has a radio show on GCN, but it's only on 12 stations.
Peter Glidden, that fake doctor that we talked about on the last episode, has a show, too.
It's only on three stations.
Also, Webster Tarpley's show, World Crisis Radio, similarly, only on three stations.
No, it's Free Talk Live, a libertarian-leaning call-in show.
That's cool.
Huh.
GCN would go on to cross the mark of being on over 1,000 stations by August 2018.
But what's fascinating is that if you look over these affiliate lists, the network itself is expanding, but it doesn't appear that Alex is doing the same.
He's constantly hovering around the 100 to 120 stations mark, even as GCN had added 400 new stations.
It really appears that the growth that the network is seeing is around other shows, not Alex's.
There's a very...
Real possibility that he reached his potential already in 2013, and networks weren't even interested in airing his show for free.
The second possibility is that advertising might cost a ton more on his show.
So even though it airs for free, the syndication is free, finding sponsors that would be willing to buy ad time during his show on your network might be prohibitive from a cost standpoint.
You can air my show for free, but good luck paying the ad buys or whatever.
So there's a lot of possibilities, but it turns out he's not the biggest thing at GCN, which kind of blew my mind a little bit.
I always really thought, and I think he probably was way back.
Yeah.
Early 2000s that Free Talk Live started and I think maybe had a little bit more, maybe they're less toxic, you know, less abrasive, less baggage to them, but still libertarian.
I mean, it's a big, color-formatted, glossy magazine.
The first issue was newsprint, and it's got a big poster.
It's got the poster in the middle of the AK-47 saying, The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed with the words inside the gun and the come and take it.
That is great to hang up at work or the office.
You know, to put in legal and lawful areas and public commas where people hang up posters.
Look at that baby.
I love how this Texas symbol of come and take it is becoming more popular than even the Gadsden flag.
I wish I would have cut these clips, but I don't know why.
I didn't think to.
He's doing free bumper sticker giveaways, and it's like, well, it sends you 50 bumper stickers, but you've got to promise not to put them on other people's cars.
unidentified
Can you not distribute a bumper sticker without getting a waiver?
And it gets like this more and more every day, but today is a particularly, absolutely jam-packed, absolutely crammed, loaded, stacked broadcast.
On so many fronts, we're going to report it all.
The reported cop killer of these three police officers out in Southern California, former Navy veteran and police officer they ran out of the force a few years ago.
Who they claim has put out this manifesto saying he's going to go after their families.
I've read both of his manifestos, if they're real.
And let me tell you, if they're not real, the person deserves a Nobel Prize for Literature because it sounds exactly like the MO of these mental patients that the system is now tracking and looking for and sifting through who think it's celebrity to be a cop, who are into the power trip.
How much he loves Biden, Obama, how he fantasizes about Hollywood, how he wants us to turn our guns in, but he's going around saying he's going to kill innocent patrol cops.
I mean, he's going to kill people, which I'm not saying he should do.
Go after the guys he says did something to him.
No, he's just randomly shooting patrol cops, reportedly, allegedly.
And I've been studying it since yesterday afternoon.
Just in a snapshot view, it looks like it's a real shooter.
So Jordan, certain patterns have developed about Alex's personality in the time that we've been watching him.
Not only his personality, but his style as a broadcaster.
You can get a sense for the sort of stories that he prioritizes, what sort of angles he'll take on said stories, and what stories he knows that he's better off just leaving alone and staying away from.
This story that he's talking about is the story in the news about Christopher Dorner, who was a guy who killed some police officers, and there was an ensuing manhunt.
That is squarely in Alex's wheelhouse as a story he would cover, and one you would expect he would make the biggest deal out of.
For the entire time since Andy Hook that we've been covering, Alex has been so consistent in his claims that the globalists are about to pull off another huge false flag to take away his guns.
He's interrupted his own broadcast multiple times because there were school shootings that he thought he could make fit that mold.
So here we have someone who's systematically murdering police, which you would definitely think would be something he could work with.
But how does Alex respond?
This episode is from February 8th.
At that point, police had been searching for Dorner for five days, and this is literally the first time I've heard him bring that story up.
He was on vacation for one of those days, but, yeah, it's crazy.
There is no reason for this not to be on Alex's radar.
The first killing was on February 3rd, and by the 4th, that manifesto had been posted online.
But listening to Alex's show on the 6th, he's just yelling about the world being a simulation and talking all this weird shit about God and joking around with collars because he's so angry.
What makes this even more insane is that what happened after the shootings began is almost exactly what Alex yells about all the time.
The L.A. Police Department was very desperate to resolve this manhunt, considering you had a dude who had extensive military training and a willingness to shoot at civilians, so in their desperation they made some mistakes.
On February 7th, the morning of February 7th, so this would be after Alex had started his research, police shot at three people they misidentified as Dorner, which is an underhand pitch if I've ever seen one.
Alex could knock that out of the park so easily, yelling about the police state and how they've manufactured this shooting in order to have an excuse to shoot at civilians, to train people to know that they're sheep or something.
He spent all his energy over this month and a half trying to make shootings look suspicious, but it's not even an issue for days.
And when he does bring it up, this is the one that he thinks is real.
That's crazy, but I think it's pretty easy to see why.
For one, like you pointed out, Christopher Dorner is a black man.
Alex's business model is about making excuses for white terrorism, so I don't feel like he feels the need to get out of his way and get too invested when he doesn't have to.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
But I don't think that's the whole story.
I mean, I kind of do, but I think there's more subtlety that's not captured within that broad explanation.
The people that Alex insists are not actually shooters in these situations whenever we have these mass events are always white, right-wing, gun weirdos, or fans of his show.
It's one of those groups is what he needs to defend.
So when one is accused of one, it's the globalists setting up a patsy or a cutout or whatever to make it look like they're part of one of those groups in order to demonize that group.
When the perpetrators of a crime aren't in one of those groups, he doesn't have anything to run with, regardless of how closely their actions match up with his beliefs about what the globalists are up to.
And that should be very fucking suspicious.
Dorner is not white.
He expresses enthusiasm about Hillary winning in 2016 in his manifesto, even back in 2013.
Oh boy.
He supports reasonable gun control measures and applauds Dianne Feinstein for her efforts at getting an assault weapons ban going.
And he is definitely not a fan of Infowars, as he explicitly goes out of his way to say he supports Piers Morgan's points, but thinks he'll always have a problem winning gun enthusiasts over because he's British.
Using Alex's twisted logic, if he were to say that this shooting and manhunt were staged, he would be tacitly saying that the globalists were doing it in an attempt to demonize themselves?
And if Alex takes that leap, the narrative completely Yeah, that's bananas.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
It's very interesting the way Alex's mind works vis-a-vis false flags.
But I think if you watch how he deals with this, you get a sense that it's super important that he needs it as a defense.
Or it could be that Obama did this by using one of his own supporters as a patsy in order to make it so the next time when it is a right-wing person, it wasn't set up.
Because it's like, oh yeah, we fucking did that one too.
But, lest you think he's someone whose opinion matters about anything, this next clip blew my mind.
Because he jumps off...
Look, whatever he's talking about here doesn't matter.
The context of this does not matter.
Because Alex accidentally says something that I really think he should spend maybe an entire show talking about because I really need to hear more about this.
So, of course, it's a day on Alex's show, so there's a new gun fear about some sort of bill that's going through.
So he gets into that here in this next clip, and I don't remember exactly what it sounds like, but according to the name of this clip, he does a dumb voice.
But first things first, that gun bill that Alex is talking about was vetoed in October 2013 by Jerry Brown, the Democrat governor of California, who said, quote, I don't believe that this bill's blanket ban on semi-automatic rifles would reduce criminal activity or enhance public safety enough to warrant this infringement on gun owners' rights.
But I thought the left was just out to get your guns and they hated the Second Amendment.
Why would a Democrat governor veto the legislation that could have easily been made law with just a signature?
I think that last clip is perfect as a representation of how Alex has set him up to be in a position to have his cake and eat it, too.
As it stands, he's decided that the Dorner shooting spree is real, so he's framing this gun bill in terms of disarming the citizens so they can't protect themselves from Dorner.
In essence, the government wants you to be the victims of his real crime.
Now, let's imagine a scenario where Alex said that, you know, let's imagine that the shooter was a white right-winger.
If that were the case, Alex gets to play the angle that the manhunt is fake and only exists to terrorize the public into agreeing to take away the guns.
The only thing that I just realized from this clip is just how easy it is.
You know, like, you know, you can almost take away his agency because there's no bad choice.
Yeah.
You know, like, I kind of still considered it as, yeah, as long as he was like, when he was coming up before Trump, he was making good choices and being successful.
Whereas in reality, it's kind of just like, you can't lose if there's a black president and you're a crazy white racist screaming, you know?
And it doesn't always boil down to that, but, I mean, if it were Clinton, like if Clinton was in office before Trump, let's say, like Hillary or Bill, whatever, the game would have played the same.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
The culture got much uglier because of people's feelings about there being a black president.
Right, right, right.
But I think Alex would have been able to do exactly what he's doing.
You know, on our last Modern Day episode, it's like, as long as his hatred and conspiracy and anger and focused outrage is directed at the power structure, there's not really all that much that's that difficult to deal with.
The idea of somebody who had military training on the loose, who had an axe to grind with the police department and felt that they had been wronged by the police department, unjustly terminated, and were willing to take this route as a way of clearing their name.
Yeah, so there's that stuff going on, and I think all that's interesting, but there are two things that happen on this episode that are far more interesting to me, and here is the first one.
I think Alex slips up a little bit at the beginning of this clip, and then overcompensates by trying to do some bits towards the end.
FreedomWorks is not perfect, and I don't really trust Dick Army, but they actually have done some pretty good things.
Even though Glenn Beck's associated with it, I will tell you, it is a lot better than Carl Rove.
You know, on the scale of things, it's like they say in Ghostbusters, you know, imagine, you know, it's like, imagine paranormal activity, each one of these ghosts being one Twinkie.
Well, imagine a Twinkie, you know, 80 feet long and weighing about 30 tons or whatever they say.
He goes, that's a big Twinkie.
I mean, you know, I have to use the scatological stuff.
We're talking about Karl Rove.
He's really obsessed with that, and all he talks about is poop all day.
You didn't know that.
His nickname is Turd Blossom by George W. Bush.
Karl Rove is like a 80-foot long, 20-ton turd.
And then Glenn Beck is like, you know, he's like a porta potty that's been at the Super Bowl.
I mean, it's fully loaded, like a fully loaded, you know, baked potato.
I always just always watch Glenn Beck prancing around.
Trying to act manly and just the whole thing.
Because some guys who are really tough try to act gentlemanly and effeminate.
It's the opposite of like some British fencer that'll kill you in five seconds and slit your throat and turn into a demon and climb around on top tables.
Versus people that really are Nelly like that.
And it's not bad.
I mean, it's okay, Glenn.
Anyways, the point is, well, he has fantasies about me and Charlie Sheen.
Have you heard those?
I'm not joking.
He constantly on air fantasizes about gay sex and stuff with me and Charlie Sheen.
Hey, dude, Charlie likes women.
I'm going to give you a little newsflash.
Believe me, I've probably stayed at his house 15 times.
Talk about a conspiracy theory.
Excuse me.
I'm sorry.
I'm going to stop right there.
I have now entered the twilight zone.
I think it's good therapy for me to go out and shoot the.50 cal.
In this next clip, this is where I got the sense that he doesn't really even want to be doing his show, and that's why he keeps just fucking riffing on stuff.
Now, what we're going to do is I'll just take phone calls for a couple segments because that little piece of news sent me off into a bad place mentally, a good place, where I don't want to focus on all this.
So Alex is, he's talking about that, you know, like the cops are aloof, they're bad cops, you see it in their eyes, and a lot of this is to reinforce his ideas that the Dorner shooting is real.
On the day that he decides to start covering a targeted murder spree of police officers and police adjacent people, it's weird for him to use that ongoing story as sort of an example of, hey, this could be worse for you if you try and take our guns.
They're now saying in the London Telegraph and ABC News that there were racist police, and that's why he has to go out and shoot white officers.
And people are saying, well, could it be staged?
They're not going to stage something where somebody's out killing people and then saying he loves Obama and Biden.
If somebody faked these manifestos, they have super advanced knowledge that I don't really think very many people have of the mindset of the minion enforcer class.
Okay, this person deserves a Nobel Prize in literature if it's fake.
And it could be.
It could be.
I mean, you never know.
They may have killed this guy, and this is some psyop, but there's dozens of little points that say it's not.
And we're going to be talking about that.
And what does the government think if there's a civil war and the cops aren't out on motorcycles and they're hiding out with one guy?
I mean, you know, in the real world, the guy who wants to kill cops is going to kill cops.
You just have police ready, and when somebody gets killed, you vector in on that and get the guy.
And he's all, your tabletop exercises won't help you and all this stuff.
I mean, he's playing soldier.
He was trained to be a soldier and then to be a cop, and then that didn't work out, so now he's targeting you.
That's why you don't want police who play soldier against the citizens.
Soldiers go and burn down cities and kill the enemy.
He talks about it in these vague terms of this really sophisticated writing of this manifesto that mirrors.
But all he ever says specifically is he wants gun control measures passed.
He supports Obama.
He likes Piers Morgan.
That's about it.
And if that's all that your qualifications are for a deep psychological profile of a real shooter, this is woefully stupid.
This is simplistic and fucking awful.
But at this point, Alex jumps back to the asteroid party because he realizes he hasn't covered this news in the way that something that could be world-ending deserves to be covered.
And thankfully, last time he was sort of being sarcastic about Godzilla and all that shit.
Thankfully, this time, he decides to approach the issue with class, aplomb, and very sincere, serious coverage.
Space Command has dispatched a spacecraft, and the asteroid is on a collision course with Earth, and they're hoping to take it out with some boosters.
They're going to fire at it and have mount on the side to direct it away, but they've got to get the booster rockets up to the speed to be able to come up against it at 17,400 miles an hour to land, to then thrust it out away from the Earth.
I mean, I'm actually happy that he went to Space Invaders or Asteroids or whatever it was for his reference, because I felt like the Armageddon reference was right there.
That's why they came up with the guns don't kill people, people kill people, is because they're like, well, it's our people don't kill people, you know?
Because if he's saying that this is real because it doesn't fit the gun grabber agenda, which he has decided what that is, he's created the parameters of what that is, the definitions, everything.
I think it's good the police have shot up two people's vehicles who were innocent.
They didn't even look like the suspect's vehicle.
I think all Californians should arrange themselves at the end of the block for the police to drive by and shoot them and their families for their safety.
But that's exactly what he cries bloody murder about all the time.
He's like, they say we're right-wingers, they're saying all of us are guilty by association.
But yet here he cannot stop bringing up that this guy is an Obama supporter and that means it's a real shooting as opposed to the fake ones that are done by people who like what I do.