Today, Dan and Jordan dip back into the past of the Alex Jones Show to explore how he behaved in the days and weeks after Sandy Hook. In this installment, the gents uncover a really important development in Alex's path toward calling the victims actors, and in the process find three interviews completely unrelated to Sandy Hook that can only be described as "trash."
Jordan, today got an interesting episode to go over, but before we get to it, we've got to give a shout-out to some people who have signed up and are supporting the show.
So first of all, I'd like to say thank you to Jim.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I like this show, I'd like to support what these guys do, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show, and we would appreciate it.
Why are they getting you ready for trips on the streets and TSA checkpoints?
I mean, down the street from me, on the road, searching people.
Illegally.
Violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Tenth Amendment.
Ninth Amendment.
Why are they doing this?
Ladies and gentlemen, because they're criminals, they're collapsing the whole society, and they know they're all going to jail if they don't totally take over and arrest their opposition.
They've stolen tens of trillions, the derivatives, the people running things make Ken Lay look like a choir boy, an angel.
The reason that I did that game that didn't go at all how I hoped it would, but the reason I did was that content of what he's saying is almost identical to things he's expressing at the present.
The guess was when you heard it, obviously it was in the past.
So it was either 2013 or I thought it might be a time travel episode and you were going to be like, hey, no, it's actually from 2009 or something like that.
I mean, it is nothing but them playing us off like two different Indian tribes, two different Native American tribes.
Early on, the Natives outnumbered settlers at some points 100,000 to one, you know, when there's like 15 settlers.
You know, estimated, you know, however many natives on the continent.
But during some of the biggest wars, 10 to 1, 20 to 1, 30 to 1. But it wasn't even the superiority of arms, because there were the French and others constantly always selling armaments to the natives who were very proficient with them very quickly.
It was that the natives were always fighting with each other.
Well, they live across that river.
They all look the same, act the same, had basically the same culture.
But it didn't matter, because...
The British intelligence and others could come in and manipulate them off against each other.
I really don't think he should be allowed to talk about history, period.
Or maybe he should talk about it more, because any time he tells us about what he thinks history was, it is a fantastical, ridiculous twisting of certain...
So that came in the context of Alex beginning this episode and what I would describe as a protracted rant about how he can't stand that people are calling him and his friends racist because they won't turn in their guns.
He has this conception that's like, I don't want to turn in my guns.
Let me tell you more about American history where all Native American tribes looked the same and basically had the same culture, but you could still trick them into fighting each other.
I don't believe that anyone is actually making the accusation that Alex...
Alex is a racist because he won't turn in his gun.
Seems like a classic straw man that he likes to play.
On the other hand, Alex is a huge racist, completely independent of his unwillingness to turn in his gun, so I get that someone might be accusing him of that, and he's just misunderstanding what they're saying.
The way he discusses Native American tribes in that clip clearly illustrates how much of a bigot he is and how bigotry informs his worldview.
The context of that clip is that he's been trying to say that the globalists are trying to trick us into fighting with each other.
His side loves their guns, but the left has been tricked into thinking that him and his friends are racists because the globalists want to demonize them to make it easier to take their guns.
Thus, the globalists are trying to play Alex and the left against each other.
The first problem that jumps out is that Alex is trying to present the plight of the Native American tribes in early American history as being the result of them being gullible and stupid.
There were so many more of them than the whites, but they were so easy to dupe into fighting with each other that the crafty whites were able to get the upper hand.
The second problem, where his real bigotry is on full display, is when he says of the tribes, quote, they all looked the same, acted the same, had the same culture.
This is absolutely nowhere near true, but it's true to Alex because he gets most of his information about Native Americans from F Troop reruns.
When Christopher Columbus arrived, thinking he'd reached the Indies, he called the people he encountered Indians.
To quote Herman Viola, curator of the Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History, quote, a fundamental mistake that persists to this day is to speak about, quote, the American Indians as if they were one people.
Despite their small numbers, the Indian peoples of North America were as dissimilar from each other as they were the peoples of Europe.
In terms of languages, clothes, lifestyles, militancy, and religion, the tribes in different parts of North America differed greatly from each other.
Native American tribes only appeared to look similar, act similar, and have the same culture if you don't.
you don't pay attention to them and see them not as people, but as things.
It's one thing for someone to say that in the late 1700s, but man, it is a real sign of severe bigotry in the mind for someone to express that in 2013.
It's fucked up.
It's different forms of government, different languages.
Look, if France and fucking Spain are the size of Indiana and Illinois right back to back and they have completely different languages, why would you imagine that Native Americans in a vast expanse geographically larger than Europe would be one monoculture?
It's kind of like that comic you know who gets a big gig and talks about it for five years.
That's kind of the feeling I'm getting with Alex.
He's insulting Piers Morgan and talking about how stupid and shitty and a globalist he is, but at the same time won't stop fucking talking about being on his show.
So you really start to get the sense of the way Alex's mind works in that last clip, with how much he needs to insist that him being a little gun baby on Piers Morgan's show was a gigantic media event, in quotes.
Even his own telling of it here, he didn't accomplish anything.
Piers Morgan is still an asshole.
His precious guns are still in peril of being grabbed by Dianne Feinstein.
Discourse hasn't been advanced, and we've gotten nowhere.
The way Alex is phrasing this is correct, and it's so weird.
I decided to think back on 2012 and January 2013 to see if Alex's claims stood up to scrutiny, that his appearance on Piers Morgan was one of the biggest media events of that time period and has been rated as such.
I'm going to consider all media coverage to be relevant to my calculations, so I'm not just considering overtly manufactured media events, although there may be some in this list.
Here are some of the things that happened in 2012 that people certainly remember way more than Alex yelling at Piers Morgan.
Putin became president of Russia again after years as prime minister.
The murder of Trayvon Martin.
The Curiosity rover landed on Mars.
The whole Mayan apocalypse thing.
Barack Obama got re-elected, so there was that whole 2012 election in the primary season.
That dude, Felix Baumgartner, live-streamed jumping out of space from that Red Bull balloon, becoming the first man to break the sound barrier without a vehicle.
And, of course, that year saw the deaths of Whitney Houston, Andrew Breitbart, Dick Clark, MCA of the Beastie Boys, Rodney King, Ernest Borgnine, Neil Armstrong, and Michael Clark Duncan.
Oh, and, of course, there was the fucking Aurora and Sandy Hook shootings.
I'm going to ask you to put your mic down because I think you're going to end up laughing and screaming during this commercial because it's absurd.
unidentified
Hey there, Frank Bates here.
Have you heard about the weird device that could wipe out 280 million Americans?
This is really scary stuff.
Defense experts warn that this odd device poses the gravest threat we've ever known.
In fact, just a few weeks ago, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich wrote an op-ed piece for the Washington Post warning about this deadly threat.
I can't believe that more people aren't talking about this.
It may be because the liberals and the government are trying to cover it up.
That's why my friend just created a free video at weirddevice.com that exposes this threat and blows the doors off the conspiracy.
Go watch the shocking video at weirddevice.com right now to discover exactly what it is, plus discover the number one way you and your family can survive this deadly attack.
I'm not sure how long this video will be online, so go to weirddevice.com before it's gone forever.
If it's 280 million people, then you assume that the only people who wouldn't be affected by knocking out of the power grid by an EMP would be people who live deep in the woods.
So since we started back in this late 2012, early 2013 time period, I've been hearing that commercial for the weird device, and every time I've had to suppress the urge to figure out what it's about.
And thankfully, it wasn't too hard, thanks to a great investigative piece by Zach Beauchamp on ThinkProgress, which a lot of this information comes from.
The weird device is but one of the advertising campaigns put out by a company called Four Patriots.
It's a company that sells survival food, seeds, and all sorts of other stuff you'd suspect a patriot-oriented company to sell.
Four Patriots is a company that was started by a guy named Alan Baylor, a Harvard graduate who was bored at his corporate job and decided to get into affiliate marketing.
This is the sort of thing where a person is aiming to drive traffic to a seller's website, so they create their own website, ostensibly as a resource on products like the one the seller is marketing, with links to the seller's website.
The internet is littered with websites like this, where a page is like a write-up of the importance of humidifying air, they have a bunch of essays with the right words, the keywords in it, and then at the end there's an Amazon link.
To a specific humidifier that is what they make money off of.
The goal is to get the affiliate website situated in a prime position with SEO so you funnel people to where the seller wants them to go.
Then the affiliate marketer gets a cut of all the purchases that come from clicks of that link.
Around 2011, Balor stumbled into how lucrative and easy to market to the conservative community are and began focusing on them specifically.
He began a company called Reboot Marketing, the parent company of all the various four patriot initiatives, and by all accounts, he created Frank Bates to appeal to all the little things that are catnip to conservatives, which all basically boil down to rank paranoia.
In 2012, the company brought in $11.8 million.
To quote Beauchamp, And one of the places he decided to take his advertising model to?
As I understand from that article in ThinkProgress, there may be some buying a ton of stuff from one of these companies and then seriously marking it up.
The affiliate marketing side of it is one place.
That's where it started.
But it appears that the business may have grown to the point where...
So it's interesting to me that one of the only things that Alex can really pull from memory that James O 'Keefe has done is going to Acorn dressed as a pimp.
And here's why that's interesting to me.
There's no reason to speak positively in 2013 about what James O 'Keefe did with ACORN, which is the Association of Community Organizers for Reform Now.
The videos that O 'Keefe made were not an investigation.
They were conceived of, planned, carried out, and edited specifically with the explicit purpose of smearing acorns set in stone from the jump.
And I say edited for a reason.
Those videos were manipulatively edited to such an absurd extent that the one thing Alex remembers about the video isn't real.
James O'Keefe didn't go to Acorn dressed as a 70s pimp with a girl dressed like a prostitute.
They showed up and talked to people in what you might call business casual attire, but later edited in footage of them dressed as a pimp and prostitute in order to make the viewer think that all the interviews, as they were happening when they were talking to the Acorn worker, they want you to think that they were dressed as a pimp and that this person was engaged.
Yeah.
As absurd.
It's a false framing of the videos, and it's the only detail that Alex remembers.
We know that he asked leading questions and edited together the Acorn employees' answers to make them look bad, because O 'Keefe was forced to release all the unedited footage in order to avoid being charged with illegally recording people without their consent, which is a crime.
And when all the video footage came out, it was like, oh.
This is clearly, you are leading them down roads, and it's nonsense.
They had to close up shop because they were unable to raise sufficient funds to continue their mission, especially with the defunding of government grants and stuff.
The right makes shit up and the left is like, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, we can't touch this anymore, and then all the normal people lose their fucking lives.
James O'Keefe didn't care about possible human trafficking or voter fraud when he made this video.
His goal was to make ACORN unable to do the work they did because it was a threat to the right wing.
His actions constituted an intentional and malicious attack on voting rights, but in the process he also managed to shutter a group that helped people receive fair wages for work, receive a quality education, and protect themselves from predatory loaning.
Ultimately, James O 'Keefe Ultimately, the legacy of James O 'Keefe's work is crippling a group that existed to help the poor.
So congratulations to him.
The Acorn videos were a big success as propaganda, largely because of the involvement of Andrew Breitbart, who discovered O 'Keefe and amplified his work and put him on retainer, basically, for Breitbart.
It's really hard to look at the sort of, all the failed stunts that O 'Keefe did before this, and how consistently his stings completely fall apart after the point of Breitbart's death, and not think that Andrew's sensibilities and knack for propaganda really had a ton for this Acorn campaign succeeding.
I don't think that Andrew Breitbart liked Alex Jones.
There was ample opportunity for him to be a guest on Alex's show before he died, and he never did come on.
They were working for similar propaganda goals so that they would appear to be natural allies.
But I get a strong sense that Andrew Breitbart didn't want anything to do with Alex.
And that can explain why in the 2009 period when the Acorn videos were hot, O 'Keefe wasn't on Alex's show either.
His bread was buttered by Andrew Breitbart.
But now it's nine months after Breitbart's death, and here is O 'Keefe spreading his wings a little bit, appearing on Alex's show.
Of all the people we run into on this show, I think I have the least respect for James O 'Keefe, if only for how much work he puts into doing absolutely nothing.
His goals are always destructive towards vulnerable communities, and his plans almost always fall apart.
But he has to put in way more effort into these scams than someone like Alex does with his work.
Alex just has to pay a staff to write headlines, and then he riffs on air, often drunkenly.
There are people who are eviler.
But somehow the fact that James O 'Keefe tries as hard as he does singles him out, in my mind, for a particular level of disrespect.
Because we're trying to track what's going on in this 2013 period, but specifically it's about trying to figure out Sandy Hook stuff.
And James O 'Keefe's appearance is not really about that.
And it's just about Alex screaming about James O 'Keefe being great and being a real journalist.
And we don't need to hear that.
But there is one point that I thought was really interesting, and that is this next clip where James O 'Keefe talks about something that he got in trouble for in the past, and he's completely lying about this situation.
You were talking about how they're authoritarians, how they're always wanting you arrested for exposing their activities.
unidentified
Exactly.
There have been a number of occasions where I've been subpoenaed.
Most famously, there was a huge story where I was in New Orleans investigating Senator Mary Landrieu, and she was not answering her constituents' phone calls during the health care debate in 2010.
Went into the federal building with a camera, a recording device, and as you pointed out, one-party consent states, so it's legal to do it in Louisiana.
But I was in a federal building, I was arrested, and they were going to let me go as a journalist.
Oh, you're just there to ask questions.
And then they found out that I was the acorn pimp.
I went into acorn posing as a pimp and hooker, and they said, well, you know, based on the senator and these other situations, we're going to have to keep you overnight in federal prison.
unidentified
And then I wake up the next day and I find myself charged with some ridiculous felony.
So he claimed that a bunch of people had told him that they weren't able to reach Landrieu, who was then a U.S. Senator in Louisiana.
Landrieu claimed that people were having difficulty because the phones were, quote, jammed, which makes sense.
There was a hot-button issue in terms of health care being discussed at that point back in 2010, which would obviously lead to an increased call volume.
O 'Keefe decided to interpret this explanation of the phones being jammed as actually meaning that Landrieu had said that there was a problem with her phone system.
He and three friends then decided to dress up like telephone repairmen and lie their way into her offices, which is super illegal.
That's called entering a federal building under false pretenses.
Once inside, according to the FBI, they quote, manipulated the telephone system, which led some to believe that their true intention was to bug her phones.
O 'Keefe denied that that's what he was doing, but ultimately it's hard to see what the goal of this stunt would have been.
She said her phones were really busy, so they dress up like telephone employees and mess with the phone system to prove the phones aren't receiving a higher call volume?
Their actions don't really make a lot of sense in that context, but they make a ton of sense if their goal was to illegally tap her phone.
If they were trying to tap the phones, it wouldn't have just been her phone.
While they were there on their quote-unquote sting, they tried to access the entire building's phone closet, which would have probably given them access to many of the phone lines in the building.
And remember, this is a fucking federal building.
Other officials, government organizations, and judges had their offices in that building.
It's pretty fucked up to consider what they could have possibly been up to.
Ultimately, O 'Keefe pled guilty to entering a federal building under false pretenses and was lucky to avoid some kind of, like, espionage charge.
Alex earlier said that the Piers Morgan thing was the biggest media event of the last year, and he's got a media guy on the show now, a great journalist by the name of James O 'Keefe, and so he's got to know what James O 'Keefe thinks about Alex's appearance on Piers Morgan's show.
But I would have loved to go to the Sidwell School, where David Gregory's kids go, and offer them to put a sign up that says, But see, that's your First Amendment right.
Well, you guys haven't done that, so I guess you don't care that much about your principals.
Now, I want to say that with or without going to the school, this conversation on the show does all that that stunt would achieve, which is put focus on this school.
And it's really fucked up to hear these dudes say that sort of thing and act like all they're doing is some kind of acceptable gun rights advocacy.
Even if school shootings weren't a very real issue, and even if there were an actual movement happening to take away people's guns, what they're joking about is making a public spectacle of a school where children are just trying to learn.
Sidwell School is not just a little house where Obama and Dick Gregory's children get private instruction.
It's a place where over a thousand kids get an education, with classes from preschool through high school.
Even if you don't cause someone to view the school as a target for an attack by these sorts of conversations and supposed hypothetical actions, by singling it out and creating a media storm around it, you are hurting children.
Because here's the thing.
That school is already a target.
And going through with a stunt like what O 'Keefe is describing is only playing into that and exacerbating the issue.
On October 18, 2012, Sidwell School was evacuated after receiving an anonymous threat by phone.
On October 2, 2014, the school was evacuated after the discovery of a suspicious package coming on the heels of a man scaling the White House fence armed with a knife.
Beginning in the 2008 primaries, if not way before, Obama and his family have had to live with constant death threats.
A large portion of these threats did not limit themselves to just the president.
They were about killing his family.
And for James to pretend he's not aware of that is pathetic.
Mere months before this interview, Sasha and Malia's school was evacuated over a threat to the student body's safety.
And now O 'Keefe is on air casually joking about planning to do things that would obviously lead to that happening a bunch more.
But he's saying, like, hey, I'm going to put this school here, or this sign here saying there's no guns, but I'll probably be arrested by Secret Service agents.
You will be in a pool in the running to have Infowars.com and our news operation finance your film to then put it out, not just on the Internet for free like I've done with all my others, but what we've seen Dinesh D'Souza and others do, putting them in theaters.
Now, I've always known how to do this.
And it's not that I shrink from work.
It's just that I know the model.
I have a lot of Hollywood contacts, as people know.
And so that is going to be the plan.
Now, they may shut everything down by then, but regardless, $100,000 sounds like a lot of money, and it is.
I would rather do the Doritos contest, quite frankly, than get in bed with your dumbass.
So I can't prove this as it relates to every Alex Jones contest, but in this case, I can confirm that Alex did actually name a winner in this contest, and presumably did pay out that $100,000 as a prize because I can find out who this person is, and I would assume they'd be crying bloody murder if Alex reneged on the deal.
This is not an episode of Gunsmoke, so it might not be as satisfying for me to describe the plot to you.
But here goes.
The short film begins at a meeting of the Homeland Security Department, where a guy is giving a briefing to a group of like eight people who have unspecified jobs.
He's giving a description of the situation that the DHS is facing that basically reads like a script written by Alex Jones, imagining what DHS and their meetings would be like.
Every time someone in the meeting expresses disapproval of what's being said, the speaker whispers in German to his assistant as if to imply that they're Nazis.
She offers to meet up and buy him a beer, and he's a bit skittish about it, but they agree to meet up at a children's soccer game at night, presumably for safety.
He spouts a ton of Federal Reserve talking points at Agent Robbins and red pills the fuck out of her.
To anyone not trapped in the Infowars delusion, he sounds like a raving madman.
But in the film, he's a prophet.
All of his ramblings end up coming true, and the rest of the movie plays out pretty much exactly like a dramatization of one of Alex's rants.
The extremist who's actually right about everything, he gets a heads-up message from Agent Robbins saying they're coming, but she misspells there as T-H-E-I-R.
I'm all for free speech and artistic expression and all that, but I would be remiss if I didn't point out how fucked up a fictional short film is like this when it exists on a platform like InfoWars.
This isn't a fiction to the InfoWars audience, so when the things reach their natural conclusion and people in the short start murdering the Department of Homeland Security people, it's hard not to imagine that his audience would see that as a happy resolution to the story.
Unsurprisingly, according to IMDB, the director, Michael Dorman, seems stuck in the corner of show business you might describe as Infowars-adjacent self-produced short films.
Now, has the DHS tried using the first part of that strategy where they call up all these guys and go, hey, tell me more about yourself and what you want to do.
I'm part of the DHS and they're doing an...
Odd and evil investigation into you guys, and then they'll reveal themselves, tell all their plots, and then we'll catch them.
No, not a possible outcome, but definitely a possible fantasy that would be created by, I don't know, free speech, make whatever kind of art you want to make, but shame on you.
So at the end there, I don't know if you caught that whole thing.
It's like China wants to start controlling parts of the United States as collateral for the debt, and they're going to take over, and that's why they need to take the guns away.
First of all, Cloward and Piven has never been enacted by anybody.
That's nonsense.
And the Cloward and Piven plan, we talked about this way back.
So it bears maybe reminding people in case they haven't heard these old episodes.
It was a plan that a couple of sociologists suggested, and the motivation for it was the realization that there are tons and tons of people who are living at poverty levels that aren't taking advantage of social safety programs.
For a long time, I was probably eligible for food stamps, and I didn't take advantage of that program.
So what they were suggesting was people being made aware of programs that they qualify for so that they would sign up, and so it would become a very large problem.
problem.
unidentified
The reason for this was not to bankrupt a state or bankrupt the country.
So I'm going to come back and get into the shootings.
And how he recommends people are able to phase off of serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
Because going right off of them, the inserts tell you, that'll make you even go more daffy duck where he bounces around and shoots off into the atmosphere or over the horizon.
That advice that Alex is giving, while very nimbly skirting legal rules about giving out medical advice, is so fucking irresponsible.
On the one hand, it's definitely better to wean off a medication than to go off a cold turkey, but even tapering off it isn't safe unless you're under the care of a doctor.
This kind of flippantness is super dangerous and could jeopardize someone's health or even their life.
The person that he's talking about, because he said he, we'll talk to him, the person he's talking about in that clip, you might assume that it's a doctor or a licensed psychiatrist.
But that assumption would be wrong.
It's a pharmacist by the name of Ben Fuchs.
Why is Alex interviewing a pharmacist, you ask?
Easy answer.
Because Ben Fuchs is a board member of Longevity, the supplement company run by veterinarian Joel Wallach, who is one of Alex's main sponsors.
Oh, also Ben Fuchs hosts a show called Bright Side on the Genesis Communications Network.
Talk about synergy.
It's important to point out that though Ben Fuchs is a licensed pharmacist, or at least he was at one period, he doesn't have a doctorate or any kind of advanced degree in the field or in any other field.
He has a Bachelor of Arts in Broadcasting and a Bachelor of Science in Pharmacy Science.
And I'm taking that information from his own bio on his own website.
You shall also know this.
In 2011, the Accreditation Council for the Pharmacy Education in America, the organization, it changed its policies and made it so a postgraduate degree in pharmacy studies is required for someone to be eligible to take the North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination.
So based on current standards, Ben Fuchsia's education doesn't even qualify him to try to be a pharmacist.
Because a doctorate of pharmacy degree is required to take the test to become a pharmacist, schools in the United States don't even...
So to sum it up, Ben Fuchs got a degree in 1986 that doesn't exist anymore.
It doesn't even qualify him to pursue a career in the field of being a pharmacist.
This man has zero qualifications to be dispensing medical advice, and he has at least two conflicts of interest with doing so on Alex's show.
But that's the thing.
He's not here to give medical advice.
He's here to sell longevity products.
And he doesn't give a fuck about the people who might be hurt by Alex using him to advocate that his listeners go off their meds.
In the most full-throated way I can possibly express this, fuck you, Ben Fuchs.
We've got to go to break, but from my research, because you're the big pharmacist and the expert, but other experts have told me, after you've been on these drugs a while, though it burns you out, then they put you usually on more, then you're in a hyper-awake form of sleep.
You're in a dream state or daydreaming state, but hyper-awake, having a hallucination, and that's why people then go and use a meat cleaver to chop up their one-year-old baby and drink the blood when the woman was a Sunday school teacher.
Like, this is your radio show now, because I'm actually going to turn off the microphone and walk out of the room, because this gets me so angry and so excited that I'll start cutting into you.
In the rest of this segment, get into the tryptophan.
And the fact that they don't, you know, what's in meat, they don't want us getting that.
The thing that is so disgusting is even while he's saying, like, oh, you should go talk to your psychologist, but they're not really physicians, and they're going to tell you maybe you should stay on it.
If you read Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8 of the Constitution and several other clauses that we have posted up at Infowars.com and PrisonPlanet.com in the Federal Government Declares Itself Royal video, and under it I have links to these areas.
It is a felony and an impeachable offense when the president or anyone in the federal government or with a federal commission takes a title of nobility.
But we've had sitting presidents become knighted.
By the way, a lot of stuff comes with that.
That's a huge payoff.
No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States, and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them shall, with the consent of the Congress, accept any present ammonium of office or title or of any kind whatsoever from any king, prince, or foreign state.
They all take giant speaking gifts, million-dollar speaking gifts by the Saudis, by the Emperor of Japan.
It's hard also not to hear this shift coming only a couple days after.
They had James Tracy on and recognized the profitability, the 10.6 million views, and also a few days after Alex did that terrible display with the Lone Star college shooting.
It's really hard not to see this video, this CNN Anderson Cooper video, as being more of an excuse than it is actual evidence to Alex.
It does feel a little artificial.
So, Alex is still a little bit ambivalent.
You can tell that something's changed, and the direction of his content is going to be towards that Hector's idea.
So those are real sources that he has that he's talking to, which is important to remember, because on this 27th, Alex gets a caller towards the end of the show, and...
This guy might be someone who Alex thinks is a real source now.
So this caller is trying to seed this information with Alex, that there are these documents that are proving that a false flag is coming in Syria, and the information is from 4chan.
Nothing is really all that different back then, really.
It's weird.
The more you look at it, the more pretty similar it is, even though some of the external appearances of things have changed quite a bit.
So the case of this information is actually really interesting.
The caller is saying that the documents have come from a hack.
He goes on to explain this, that they came from a hack of a group called Britam Defenses.
And it is apparently true that that firm was the victim of a cyber intrusion.
Much of the information that was leaked afterwards was legitimate.
They ended up getting put out.
Even the stuff that was on 4chan.
A lot of the documents that came out were legitimate.
However, experts who have studied the leak are certain that the document about a pending false flag in Syria is fake, was fabricated specifically to be put in this leak, and was planted there.
So the fact that this fake document was planted into a legitimate leak of hacked documents really calls into question who it was who carried this out.
It doesn't seem like it would be some random person or low-skilled hacking group since Britom was penetrated as part of the operation.
The only real motive for inserting the false document, which is the one that was publicized using the other documents as support, like people weren't talking about the other documents.
It was this specifically fake one that was the one that got all of the media push.
It's what this caller is calling in to try and sell Alex on.
The only motive is to make any chemical attacks that Assad might commit immediately be suspected as false.
Why don't you scan those in, put them up to YouTube, and again, 4chan is just, you understand, anonymous can be good, it can be bad, but a lot of times it's government sock puppets.
Do you understand that?
unidentified
I understand that, Alex.
Look, I'm sending it to you at showtips.infowars.com.
Now, what I thought was interesting was, I heard that, and Alex being like, now, you know, there's good information, there's bad information that comes out of anonymous sources, you know, a lot of government sock puppets.
I heard that, and I immediately, I don't know why, but I immediately was like, he's gonna fucking report this as a story.
Like, I just knew.
I had a hunch.
And so I had to listen to the 28th because I was like, I'm positive he's going to report this.