Today, Dan and Jordan get back to the past to continue looking into what Alex Jones was doing in the days after Sandy Hook. Not a whole lot to learn about Alex's opinion on the shooting this episode, but the gents do get to talk a bit about Alex planning tax fraud with his neighbor, "the Illuminati card game," and Alex recommending a book that Timothy McVeigh liked even more than the Turner Diaries.
Today we are back in the past, and we'll be going over January 15th and 16th, 2013, in an attempt to find out how Alex Jones behaved in the aftermath of Sandy Hook.
Although, weirdly, in our last episode, covering the 14th, he did get mad at a caller who wanted to say that Robbie Parker, one of the parents of one of the children who died at Sandy Hook, was an actor.
Alex got mad at him and responded, I'm not going to...
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I'd like to support this show, I'd like what these guys do, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show.
In that way, it's also a more innocent time in that on this January 15th episode, Alex has introduced articles of impeachment against Barack Obama and then spends most of the rest of the beginning of the show doing a supplement infomercial.
So, Alex Jones runs, in the more recent days, he's had Infowars Life, which was private labeling a lot of products that were created by Dr. Group and the Global Healing Center.
But before Alex got involved with Dr. Group, He had another sponsor and that is this Dr. Wallach who also is not a doctor.
He is a veterinarian.
He made the Beyond Tangy Tangerine and all sorts of other products that Alex promotes, and he plugs.
And like I said, I've made the point before, so I don't want to focus on it too much, but he's not a human doctor.
He's a veterinarian, though he did get his veterinary degree from my alma mater at the University of Missouri, so I'm pretty sure that means that he's cool enough to give humans medical advice.
Back in the 1980s, Dr. Wallach was treating cancer patients with a substance known as latriol, which it should be pointed out definitely contains cyanide.
Doctors who have studied latriol as a possible cancer aid have been pretty clear in saying that it should not be used.
There's a considerable risk of serious adverse effects from cyanide poisoning after latriol, especially after oral ingestion.
The risk-benefit balance of latriol as a treatment for cancer is therefore unambiguously negative.
The drug is most memorable is one of the things that Steve McQueen tried in his unsuccessful fight against terminal cancer, paying a quack doctor approximately $40,000 a month for latrial treatments that did nothing.
In 1991, Wallach claimed he was nominated for a Nobel Prize, which is impossible for him to know since the Nobel Committee keeps nominees' names confidential.
In 1995, it was reported that Wallach was using chelation therapy to treat heart conditions, which is absolutely not an appropriate medical treatment for heart conditions.
He got into a little bit of trouble when a family member of one of his patients complained that their relative had died after Wallach told him not to go see a normal doctor and that his chelation detox routine was effective.
Chelation therapy for heart disease treatment has been condemned by the NIH and "every scientific medical organization that has reviewed it." A few years prior, Mohamed Kakvan, a doctor in Houston, was ordered to pay $2.15 million in damages to the family of a patient who died in his care in very similar circumstances, with chelation being used to treat heart disease.
It's unclear why Wallach didn't end up in a similar situation, but it might have something to do with the fact that Wallach's victim's wife never pressed charges and, quote, is also a disciple of Wallach's ideas and health care and had the body cremated.
Wallach's entire thing that he preaches now, and sells on Alex Jones' show, his whole idea is that everyone is secretly minerally deficient, and they don't know it.
So his mineral-rich supplements are all they need to cure all manner of illness, and in theory, live to their natural lifespan that they should be living to, which is 120 to 140 years of age.
So Wallach claims that even though there are these studies and stuff that show that he's full of crap, he claims that he studied five distinct cultures that have lifespans that he calls natural, which again is between 120 and 140 years.
Joel Wallach is a dangerous lunatic, and his appeal to people is so in line with what Alex Jones does that when you really think about it, it makes complete sense that he's an early sponsor of the show.
Wallach exploits two things to sell his products, and they're very similar to what Alex exploits, hope and resentment.
Wallach offers a simplistic and completely unproven explanation for everything that ails you.
Everything that's wrong with your health has an easy fix.
It's all just minerals.
You just gotta buy his pills and you'll be good as new.
This is false hope.
Alex does the same thing with politics.
By distilling very complicated situations with many different perspectives and interests, he turns that all into a battle between good-guy patriots and evil, overpowered globalists.
Each of them hijack the part of your brain that yearns for an easy answer for a hard question and gives you hope that it could just be that simple.
Wallach also harnesses resentment to sell his wares.
Most people don't love the medical field.
Almost everyone's had some sort of a bad experience with a doctor or at a clinic or have a loved one who had some sort of a medical complication or something like that.
So it's pretty easy to suggest that your bad experience, you know, it wasn't coincidence or bad luck.
It was actually the medical establishment being too dumb or too corrupt to even care about treating you.
If only they'd listened to Dr. Wallach and given you his minerals, then you wouldn't have had that bad experience.
He uses that to tap into people's resentment or their bad experiences in order to convince them to come to his side.
Alex does the same thing with the government.
We all have some complaints about the government.
It's very natural, since the government does a lot of shitty things.
The problem is that Alex takes those feelings and uses them to push people towards his own goals, as opposed to allowing them to feel their disappointment and resentment towards the government and let that grow into whatever form of civic action they feel is appropriate.
It again is a hijacking of normal, fairly universal feelings for exploitative purposes.
So, it makes total sense that he's here on Alex's show doing this infomercial.
It's weird that it takes up so much of the show, though.
Yeah, it's very strange to me that we've had this progression over time of his show from the day of Sandy Hook into just gun extremism, wall to wall.
Then Alex goes on Piers Morgan's show, and then it's a just navel-gazing festival of I'm so awesome, nobody can stop talking about how great I am, I'm the biggest story in the world.
And then I also found this, which made me not want to listen to his interview on our show.
unidentified
Hey, guys.
Hey, Young Jeopardy family in Las Vegas.
You know, it's me here, Theo.
Your guy.
Rip the Lakers.
You know, running up and down the floor trying to get this championship.
It's great to see you guys.
I'll be here with you guys.
And sorry I can't be there in person, but, you know, hopefully this message, you know, is a good message for you guys.
And, you know, just want to say thank you for all the things you've done in my life.
To help me continue my career and continue to be an energetic person and have this great product to be able to go out and to just introduce people to something that's healthy and something that can give them the energy that they need constantly throughout their life.
He uses that as sort of defense for his argument that he did all these autopsies, and he's like, oh, everyone who dies of natural causes, it's really just a mineral deficiency.
I mean, I was always naturally kind of an aggressive guy.
I'm angry some of the time and stuff, but not in a bad way.
Why, when I take Beyond Tangy Tangerine, essential fatty acids, and things like Rebound and stuff, why does it make me bounce off the walls and have so much more energy?
unidentified
Well, because your testicles, Alex, God love them, require all 90 essential nutrients to make testosterone.
So if you're eating four to six eggs a day, you're taking the Alex pack twice a day because you're a big guy, you're going to produce enough testosterone to make an elephant happy.
And so you don't need to do any doping here.
You don't need to take testosterone patches and all that kind of stuff.
You just give your body what it needs, and you will make enough testosterone that you will be a man's man.
In the intervening two and a half years almost now that we've been doing this podcast, We've never heard him explicitly tell us another time that it is time to pray.
So that's all we got on the 15th, because largely, most of the show is that Dr. Wallach infomercial, and then Alex banging the gong for his impeachment articles.
Well, he crows a whole lot about the idea that the Founding Fathers set up the government in such a way that citizens write the articles of impeachment and then the politicians can pick them up and run with them.
But we get into the 16th, and on January 16th, 2013, Barack Obama has a press conference where he talks about gun control, and he has a bunch of the children around him, and he discusses...
Common sense gun reform that he would like to push through and like to work on.
And Alex plays a bit of the press conference.
And lo and behold, he can't stop interrupting it.
You can't even hear it over him being combative and yelling.
So that's, you know, he's sort of saying that, like, if we could turn this country around, you got that to look forward to, which I think is probably the best incentive to turn this country around.
It goes back to the age of chivalry in the 15th, 16th, 17th century.
If you were rude to someone, and it all came out of the Enlightenment and people becoming free, it was, I don't care who you are.
You insult me.
You be a lord.
You be anybody.
You're going to get in a fight with me.
I'm going to call you out, and no one's going to associate with you ever again if you don't pull your sword or walk your 20 paces, and we're going to fight to the death right now.
Okay?
You just insulted me.
You just acted like a tough gangbanger.
Get out in the street.
Somebody's going to die right now!
An armed society is a polite society.
And if you're watching me on TV today, if you're watching the radio streams on TV right now, you notice I'm wearing...
We've talked a bit in the past about the death of Socrates, so again, I don't want to get too in-depth into that right now, but suffice it to say that he had only himself to blame for the situation he was in.
The Athenians were primarily concerned with him being blasphemous and harassing people in the public square, and they put him on trial for it.
When he was found guilty, he was given the chance to choose his own punishment, and he said that he should be given free meals for life, at which point they were like, all right fuck it we're gonna kill you yep even after being sentenced to death it was very clear that they didn't really want to kill him and they would be totally cool if he just left town since the main issue is that he was harassing everyone with his lectures since he believed so strongly in the rule of law and of athenian democracy socrates refused to save his own life by leaving since his death was what the law decided was his own punishment
As for Aesop, the only things anyone even knows about his life come from fairly unreliable sources that border on legend, existing most likely entirely as oral tradition for about 600 years before they were ever written down.
It's said that he was thrown off a cliff in Delphi, having been accused of stealing a cup from a temple.
Other sources say that the reason he was killed was because he got really mad at the crowd in Delphi at a speech he was giving when they didn't give him any money, calling the Delphians, quote, slaves of all Greeks.
Because of this great offense to the dignity of the city of Delphi, and worrying that if he left the city, he would bring great shame to the reputation by talking shit about them wherever he went, some have suggested that the priest in the city planted a cup in his baggage to set Aesop up.
When the Delphians took Aesop to the cliff from which he was to be thrown, he recited two very insulting fables to them, and called on the Muses to avenge his death, and then threw himself off the cliff to his death.
So other versions of the story involve him insulting the religious traditions of Delphi, calling their ritual sacrifices greedy, which led to him getting charged with blasphemy, being stoned to death, and then his body thrown off a cliff.
Whatever the case, there's some sort of mythical reality to these stories, but no real reality.
A large piece of how this story was used was to create an explanation for subsequent famine and violence against the citizens of Delphi.
Within the oral tradition, these events were not just bad luck or an isolated war.
they were the consequences of Delphi immorally killing Aesop.
The entire affair takes on a cosmic importance in a poetic narrative.
When you study oral tradition, you find a lot of this sort of thing.
Stories transform to fit stereotypes and archetypes, and you see it in the story of Aesop's death as it becomes the story of a scapegoat that explains...
Alex doesn't understand any of this stuff, but it's really funny just to see this little glimpse and see that he believes that lore is true throughout all of history.
It's so weirdly consistent how unable he is to get out of this little framework of just thinking, well...
You know, that is kind of fascinating in the way that because we know he can't read and hates the written word, his belief naturally leans towards the oral tradition.
Anything that's said he believes, anything that's written down terrifies him.
We've got to hit them with the info war, the truth.
Now I give you James David Manning, a chief pastor at the Otla World Missionary Church, reaches millions of people every month online in a big church there in town, and has a huge soup kitchen program that's non-government run for the citizens of the area.
He's completely transformed his narrative over the course of a few weeks.
So now, without a fair amount of context and understanding, which we're able to have because we've spent the time looking at it, it would be easy to not even recognize what he's done.
After Sandy Hook, Alex wrestled for a little while with how the shooting was probably staged by the globalists, even dipping his toe into they were actors there kind of waters.
He needed the event to be suspect, because if the globalists are behind the shooting, then that goes a long way towards proving that Alex is right, that this only happened as a justification to take his guns.
So the narrative pivots, and his show becomes nothing short of a gun paranoia, doom porn kind of thing for weeks, with every person who comes on the show being people like Larry Pratt and Stuart Rhodes.
They show up constantly to lend credibility to Alex's screaming about how the big one is coming.
This pageant culminates with Alex doing a huge publicity stunt, starting a petition to get Piers Morgan deported over gun issues.
Of course, that was really just the opening volley, because Piers played along, and the real culmination is Alex going on Piers Morgan's show and yelling at him about how you're going to take the guns in 1776, blah blah blah.
That narrative played out exactly as it was supposed to.
Alex has penetrated the mainstream news, and everyone making fun of him is just more proof that he's actually right.
That is now fully implanted, so the narrative has to pivot again.
Instead of treading water in the gun paranoia bucket, Alex is able to build further upon the block that he's created in order to get to his next step.
This is a classic game of what I would describe as if this is true, what else must be true?
If the globalists stage Sandy Hook, it must also be true that they're doing that to come for Alex's guns.
If they're coming for Alex's guns, what else must be true?
It must also be true that the only thing that we can do is impeach Obama.
This show feels completely different now in these couple of days.
And you see it with these completely different guests and an obsessive focus on Obama and getting him out of office with banging the drum of the impeachment, screaming over his press conference.
When Alex needs to push gun paranoia, he can call Pratt or Ted Nugent.
When he needs to push financial collapse narratives, he can call Gerald Salenti or Peter Schiff.
And now that the theme of the show has changed from We Love Guns, Get Ready to Use Your Guns, to We Should Impeach the President, he has a disgusting attempt at a publicity stunt with the Obama phone lady, and now he's called in the most anti-Obama person around, Reverend James David Banning.
This is very interesting, the way that these narratives build upon each other.
And he knows well enough to jump off and pivot before it becomes stagnant.
It's very interesting to me.
I've been waiting for Manning to come back up on the show, because since the last time we talked about him, he's found himself in a little bit of trouble.
When we did our episode covering Manning, we discussed a leaked tape of him sexually harassing a former student at his Otla school while alone in a car with her, someone who was conservatively 50 years younger than him.
She was 18 when the tape was recorded, but in it, Manning discusses how he started having sexual feelings for her when she began at his school when she was 14. He talks about wanting to pull up her skirt and says, quote, you've got an incredible body.
I ended up editing that portion of our episode out at that point because I couldn't find any sources that I would consider credible that were reporting on the tape.
So I thought that there was the smallest possibility that it was someone doing a really, really good Reverend Manning impression.
Since then, the Huffington Post did an extensive investigation of Manning's at-law church, and the verdict is in, it is fine for us to talk about this.
And the picture of it is much darker than it appeared, even when we covered it.
Even as dark as a 70-year-old man impotently flirting with one of his former students absolutely is.
That's very dark, but the reality is much worse.
I don't...
Speaking to many former attendees of Manning's school, which is an offshoot of his church, a picture firmly forms of a lunatic cult leader who, because of his position, wields an unbelievable level of power, which he's more than happy to abuse.
The first thing to consider is that parents who would put their kids in his school are almost certainly members of his church, and if that's the case, then they almost certainly think Manning is the most godly person in the world and humanity's only chance.
He's created a messianic thing about himself, and we've seen that demonstrated pretty clearly.
Like in all the clips we've played where he yells from the pulpit about how he's immortal, for instance.
The student wasn't allowed to eat on the first day and said that his thoughts drifted to suicide as the minutes dragged on in the dark, alone in the basement.
Incidentally, what that student was being punished for was dating a girl and being sexually active.
That girl didn't get punished, but it's probably just a coincidence that she was the one who later recorded Manning telling her she had a great body and wanted to see her breasts.
The dynamics you read about in this HuffPost article are terrifying.
These kids are being abused, whether it's through the kinds of allegedly biblical punishments he employs or through Manning's use of his own YouTube videos as curriculum for their education.
And the kids can't leave because their parents believe that the school's headmaster is infallible and he's made a practice of convincing parents to disown their children when they question him too much.
Just think about the situation that puts these kids in.
They can either put up with literally whatever Manning wants to do to them, or they can risk being disowned and expelled and immediately becoming homeless and a high school dropout.
And that's not a hypothetical either.
That's literally what happened to multiple students who believed that the tape of Manning sexually harassing his former student was real.
And it happened to Joshua Farr, who Manning baselessly accused of being gay, who was then kicked out of the school and became a homeless high school dropout, and then later also to that guy's brother Isaiah.
Then Derek Mills was kicked out for refusing to end his friendship with Isaiah.
Inevitably, Manning always makes the abuse he inflicts on these people their own fault.
After he kicked the students out who believed that that tape of him was real, he said this from the pulpit.
Quote, Sharif Hassan, that's the guy who got locked in the basement, and, yeah.
Hassan's friends have been led down a path to destruction by following him, and perhaps even believing him.
Many of you tonight do not have your children with you because of the lie perpetrated and false and doctored tape perpetrated by Hassan.
He goes on to call the students who he had expelled and made homeless, quote, demons.
The HuffPost article includes this image which I find endlessly terrifying.
Quote, The former students watched on their computers and phones, horrified at the idea of their parents and siblings sitting in the audience intermittently participating in claps and cheers, as Manning calls their children demons.
It's terrifying.
Also, in one article I read, I can't confirm that this is the case, but in another article, they said that they spoke to former church members who said that Manning asked them to shit in bags and leave them at gay-owned businesses.
I would question whether that sodomite ever sent him a bucket of poop, or if it was him projecting about what he was doing.
This is gross cult leader shit.
And I guess that the only positive is that the HuffPost covered it, and hopefully word is starting to get out that this man is a dangerous lunatic who's abusing his congregation for his own enrichment.
Four former congregants told HuffPost that, quote, Manning decided a few years ago the congregants weren't donating enough of their income to the church.
That's when he started imploring followers to give him access to their bank accounts.
He told them they didn't know how to manage their money and that he would take better care of it than they could, which is something that cool pastors do.
What makes all this extra scary is that in 2016 we got a glimpse into how Manning might respond if his grip on his flock was ever truly threatened.
He owed about a million dollars in utility bills and back taxes, and his church was in danger of being foreclosed on.
Manning did not deal with that well.
In a moment of apparent desperation, Manning made a video threatening to barricade himself inside the church with kids from the community.
He said the standoff could turn violent, even worse than wounded knee.
It's unclear if he was imagining himself as being the U.S. Cavalry or the Lakota in that analogy, but whatever the case is, it's clear that he was sending a message that if anyone tried to come take his building, he was perfectly fine using the children of his congregation as human shields.
That takes on particular importance on today's episode.
Alex Jones spends a lot of time talking about how Obama is using these children at his press conference as human shields when he's talking about gun regulation.
It's a gross way for Alex to attack the idea that there are youths who are affected by gun violence and are in favor of gun control, but it becomes even grosser to realize that the guy Alex called to help him demonize Obama happens to be a guy who is literally threatening to use children as human shields just a few years later, and at the time of this interview, this recording, he was actively traumatizing students at his bullshit school.
Representative Steve Toth joins us and he's made national news coming up with a legislative plan to battle back against this and for the state of Texas to not recognize unconstitutional federal laws.
Number two, he won his seat in the State House of Representatives in Texas in an election with no Democrat running.
He only was up against a candidate from the Libertarian Party and naturally won easily.
That was in the 2012 race.
In 2014, he decided to give up his seat in District 15 and seek election to the Senate.
the state senate in the 16th district but lost ultimately showing that the support he was receiving most of which came from the tea party wasn't enough to get him back into a possibly more important office elevated office sure He then ran for the U.S. House of Representatives seat in 2016 and lost in the primary.
In 2018, Toth put his tail between his legs and ran once again for the very seat he'd given up back in 2014, the Texas House District 15 seat.
He won the seat and ended up right where he left off, which is kind of hilarious considering how high the rate of re-election is for state House of Representatives and how they don't have term limits.
He literally just wasted everyone's time and money because of misguided ambition, only to end up in a position he couldn't Might not be.
Of course.
Hardline anti-immigrant, anti-choice, and anti-Islam groups paid a lot of money to make sure the conservatives who won seats in that election were not the types who, like Joe Strauss, would be against Trump's Muslim ban or the bills flying around that dictate who can use what bathrooms.
These political action committees wanted warriors, and Steve Toth was willing to be that to get...
One of these groups is the Texas Right to Life, which gave Toth $17,500 for his campaign.
In that same election cycle, Texas Right to Life received a ton of criticism for turning on anti-choice candidates they'd supported for a long time in favor of new options who were crazy far right.
Quote, Texas Right to Life has kind of lost their way.
It's unfortunate they are not doing what they started out to do.
That's a quote from Paul Workman, a former representative of Texas's 47th district.
Workman literally championed legislation that would require women to get a sonogram before receiving an abortion in hopes that making her experience that would change her mind.
He supported every anti-choice bill ever introduced, including one that would increase the licensing requirements for women.
The political action committee that donated $17,500 to Steve Toth thought Workman was too middle of the road on abortion.
In 2014, the Texas Freedom Network wrote a piece about how Steve Toth was too extreme even for Texas Republicans.
They discussed how he led a completely fabricated crusade against the Texas School District's curriculum management tools, complaining that their lessons were "anti-American" and "an anti-Christian and promoted Marxism and Islam.
Also, the article includes this, quote, "Toth also tells a ridiculous story to promote his opposition to sex education that includes information about birth control.
During the 2013 legislative session, Toth said his wife knew two unmarried teens who got so hot and bothered at a Planned Parenthood sex education class, which included information on contraception, that the guy couldn't get a condom on before he impregnated his girlfriend in the car later.
He used this bullshit argument and things like that to justify legislative budget cuts that gutted the Texas Women's Health Program and led to tens of thousands of low-income women losing access to family planning services.
I actually had a super hard right sex education teacher who told me that having sex without a condom was like putting your hand into No, glove on your hand when you put it into a fucking thing of toxic waste.
It's him realizing that the way he's been living his life has been completely wrong and that doing things for others is actually a much better way to live and then he gets to go to the next day finally once he grows through the despair and the futility of killing himself and all this.
If Alex really feels like he's living Groundhog Day, I would advise him to consider the message of that movie.
I think it's fascinating that along with his inability to differentiate truth and fiction, he also has no idea how to engage with the message of fiction.
Okay, interesting thing is this card game started out as an online game.
Okay?
Running on what we would call an Illuminati server, I guess, which was a DBS system.
So the game started on a server, and then Steve Jackson's game was raided by the Secret Service, and they confiscated the server and the data that was on that server.
The game was never supposed to get out, according to Stephen Dollins, said to be an ex-Satanist high priest, who exposed the game.
So the short version of how this goes is, it goes like this.
Illuminati is a card game that was created by Steve Jackson Games in 1982.
The goal of the game is to take on the role of a secret society which goes on to take over the world.
It was a very successful game in the circles that played massively complicated card games in the early 80s, and it spawned expansion packs that have been released over the years, the most recent coming out in 2010.
The concept of the game started out with Steve Jackson considering creating an adaptation of Robert Anton Wilson's Illuminatus trilogy, but deciding that that would be too convoluted and way too confusing.
So what Steven Jackson realized he could do, while he couldn't adapt the Illuminatus trilogy, he could take the basic ideas of the trilogy, like the notion of grand conspiracies being behind everything, and use that as...
the central concept of his game.
That proved to be a viable jump-off point, and after Jackson did a ton of research into conspiracy theory worlds to gather some specific details, Yeah, I get it.
So it's important to remember that the Illuminatus trilogy is a work of satire.
It's meant to kind of make fun of and mock the patterns of reasoning used in conspiracy theory, and Jackson's Card Game is an extension of that.
So while the imagery is pretty similar to what you'd see with 9-11...
The game was made right after the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993, so it might not be as crazy as it seems just on first glance.
Conspiracy theorists use that card and a couple others to make the argument that Steve Jackson knew it was coming and that this game is proof revealing in advance lesser magic tricks.
The original deck came out in 1982, but the one that included the terrorist nuke card came out in 94. So when conspiracy theorists talk about these cards, they usually talk about it having a...
The game is a parody of conspiracy and to some extent even takes shots at itself.
One of the cards in the deck is Trading Card Games and features a suspicious man opening his trench coat to reveal cards inside that he's clandestinely selling.
I've never played it, but all the reviews I've read make it seem like a really fun game that uses interesting strategy elements, and it's won at least four Origins Awards, the first of which was being the Best Science Fiction Board Game Award.
So it's not like this is some kind of a secret thing that accidentally got out, like that guy is trying to suggest, the racist South African caller.
So it's hard for me to think that this is anything more than a coincidence.
It could be a winking joke on Steve Jackson's part, because the card, like I said, came out in 1994, and at that point Alex was on Austin Local Access, and Jackson does operate out of Austin.
So it's possible...
That he would have been aware of Alex and it would be a winking joke.
But my problem is that the card looks a lot like later day Alex and not a lot like 94 Alex.
And he's talking into a mustard bottle as a phone.
As for Steve Jackson games getting raided, that had nothing to do with this Illuminati card game.
Like I mentioned earlier, that game won the Best Sci-Fi Board Game Award in 1982, and the raid didn't happen until March 1st, 1990.
The decks involving all the cards that conspiracy theorists point to were still four years away from being made when the raid went down itself.
The issue was that Steve Jackson Games hosted a bulletin board for users to interact on called Illuminati.
One of the operators of that board was a hacker named Lloyd Blankenship, and the Secret Service had tracked down a stolen document with proprietary information about Bell South's 911 system to that bulletin board and another one run by Blankenship.
The court documents reflect that agents based a search warrant on the fact that, quote, Okay.
which was way more the sort of thing that the Secret Service would be investigating.
Yeah.
unidentified
However, when Agent Foley arrived at the Illuminati message board for Steve Jackson Games, he saw this greeting and got the wrong idea about it.
You've entered the secret computer system of the Illuminati, the online home of the world's oldest and largest secret conspiracy, fronted by Steve Jackson Games Incorporated.
Because he didn't understand the humor of the site, Foley thought that this was an indication that this message board, run for game enthusiasts, was wrapped up in the 911 document and malicious hacking, with the game company being a fake front business.
The fact that Blankenship was an employee of Steve Jackson Games didn't help.
And with that, the game company got included in the raid and their computers and materials were seized.
From there, everything went to shit.
The investigators had created a mess because they'd failed to do their homework.
They quote, knew or had the ability to learn that the seizure of the Illuminati bulletin board included private and public electronic communications and email, the seizure of which was not within the scope of their warrant and was a breach of the Privacy Protection Act.
By the next day after the raid, Steve Jackson had requested his stuff back, which experts estimated should have been able to have been copied if needed and returned to him in hours and no more than within eight days.
He would not get his things back until late June 1990, approximately three and a half months later, which was a huge problem for him running his business because they had confiscated What the fuck?
The objective was this stolen 911 document, but even if they were able to establish that Blankenship had stolen it, which I'm not sure they ever did establish, taking this to trial would be a fucking nightmare.
Also, just to be totally clear about this, the caller has his timeline completely messed up.
At the time of the raid, Steve Jackson Games was working on and about to release a role-playing game called Grupp's Cyberpunk, or Grupp's is an acronym for Generic Universal Role-Playing System.
It was a way that you could play RPGs on bulletin boards with this guidebook, this Grupp's Cyberpunk.
The Grupps, the generic universal role playing system was a response to the idea that a lot of these games are really fun, but they only could be played in certain environments.
So this is all bullshit, but I find this stuff so interesting.
Like, whenever there's these sorts of kernels of, I guess you'd call it conspiracy lore, there's almost always a better story behind it that these conspiracy theorists are completely missing in order to make their fake story.
So this is also part of that narcissistic aggrandizement.
This idea of these people just hounding me non-stop to have me on their shows.
It goes along with the, you know, the government's targeting me as soon as I put out this Obama impeachment thing.
It's kind of a way of focusing that same energy of the navel-gazing, I was on Piers Morgan stuff, and using it to facilitate the anti-Obama narrative, or the Obama impeachment narrative that is the current theme of the show.
So remember how I told you that Steve Toth Did some really damaging things to women's health in Texas because of his bullshit story about people fucking after a health class.
Adam Lanza, the Patsy, or whoever he is, the whacked out of his mind, the cover of a Hollywood movie about mind control, same look in all these guys' eyes, on psychotropics, under psychiatric care.
They fought like a devil to keep that from coming out, but his family's on record now.
He tried to buy a gun five times and couldn't get one.
I mean, obviously, you go in a gun shop, plus his mental illness was in the health record.
It got filed.
And he looked like he was whacked out of his brain.
I've been at gun shows with private dealers, you know, somebody selling off their collection.
They don't sell to people that look like they're illegal aliens.
So one of the things that I think is important to point out here, other than Alex just being completely narcissistic and making everything about himself intentionally, because it works for the theme of what he's trying to do.
And that's why he cut off the part of the clip before he got to the part where Obama said the only way we're going to make progress is if these people's followers and listeners and constituencies understand the issue.
I think he could probably rebut that by saying, like, the reason that I thought of those people is because they're the people who are demonized and the enemies of the globalists or something.
But even though Glenn Beck is generally a globalist shill, according to...
I don't know.
Yeah.
I know what you mean.
I think...
I think it's actually correct.
I just don't think it would be a nail in the coffin for Alex.
I think it would be easy for him to wiggle around that.
They cannot stand the fact that I got up there and said, you want to take our guns, you want to enslave us.
That was the number one story in the country for two days.
They were talking about Alex Jones first and foremost.
That's why we need your prayers.
Because they go, oh, you're discredited.
You're yelling at us.
You're calling us criminals.
That's not a real debate.
You're not a real person having a real debate.
You're not like my neighbor coming over and going, Hey, we don't have enough land to have an agriculture exemption, but if we combine together and get an agriculture exemption, we can get off on our taxes.
You know, if we put honeybees on it or maybe a cow or two, how's that sound?
You want to do that?
Man, that's a really good idea.
Yeah, that'll lower our taxes massively.
You know, I've been so busy, I really haven't had time to go talk to you.
I'm glad you reached out to do that.
Yeah, let's do that.
I waited so long, the neighbor went ahead and just bought some more properties.
They could do it, but they're still nice enough.
I'm going to talk to them to let me merge in with them.
But the point is, that's a negotiation.
That's a good faith.
You know, talking to my neighbor.
Hey, how you doing there?
Jesse?
Or whoever the neighbor is.
How are you doing today?
Let's talk about, as regular people, nice, calm voices.
So, Jordan, the first thing I want to make note of here is that if Alex is considering converting his land to agricultural use to skirt property taxes, he's got to be talking about acres of land he's working with, because otherwise that wouldn't make any sense.
Secondly...
He's absolutely talking about a conversation he definitely had with his neighbor Jesse about committing tax fraud.
The land must have been devoted to agriculture or timber production for at least five of the past seven years.
Unless Alex has been running a stealthy boutique honey business he's been failing to plug for the last half decade, it seems like he's 0 for 3 on the criteria required for an agricultural tax exemption.
Alex seems like he's just talking shit here, and it sounds like he can't get his shit together enough to actually get this plan in motion with his neighbor, but if he did, that is definitely a tax crime.
Absent any evidence that he's actually followed through with this, I'm just going to leave this here as an example of Alex being very, very stupid.
But I do want to point out that when he has to come up with an example of a straight-up good-faith negotiation, his mind goes to conspiring with his neighbor to defraud the IRS.
Because tax dollars go away that need to be made up somewhere else, and it can be passed down to all other consumers.
and then also other people who rely on agricultural tax provisions.
So Alex is really only hurting the people he pretends to support with that sort of a move.
But again, I don't know if he actually followed through with it, and I don't know how I would ever find that out, short of leaving a blind item or like an anonymous tip with the Texas comptroller.
So he is the main center of the group of people that the president is responding to and afraid of.
Partially, undoubtedly, I mean, if you believe all of these things together, it's because Alex has entered impeachment articles on his website that the website gets attacked as soon as Obama gets up for the press conference, the press conference wherein he specifically is talking to Alex.
This is one of those things that if this wasn't coming from someone who standed to gain a lot of money by creating the perception that the president was responding to him and all this, if that wasn't the context we were hearing this in, I would see this as a mental break.
So I think the giddiness is more a reflection of that than it is him actually sincerely believing that Obama is directly talking to him through the TV.
It's scary either way, but it's, I mean, scary on like a uh-oh, uh-oh kind of way, as opposed to a scary what he's bringing into the world kind of rhetoric.
And they've taken the country over by fraud, and now they don't want us armed to ever be able to get our country back because they're planning real tyranny.
They want those guns so bad because they're in a race before everything collapses.
Because if it all collapses, they'll use it to be able to take over and get control.
But if we have guns and fight off the roving hordes of welfare people burning things, that won't play into their hands, will it?
So they've got to get guns demonized so they can have cover to wage their homeland security war on gun owners, and that's the plan.
Also, why are you creating this bizarre nonsense about impeaching the president if you keenly are aware that he's just a front man for the fucking globalists?
So in this next clip, Alex gets a call from a guy, and much like that racist South African, I think he's a bad dude.
unidentified
I think regarding the Second Amendment, we could clear up all the confusion of terms, intent, and reason if everybody would just go get a copy of Unintended Consequences and read it cover to cover.
Unintended Consequences is a 1996 book written by a guy named John Ross.
The book is 800 pages long and pretty hard to get a copy of.
It's super expensive to find online since it's been out of print for years.
So I wasn't able to read it just to discuss this caller's very strange comment, but I did the next best thing and I read a whole bunch about the book online.
A bunch of reviews, a bunch of essays about it.
Unintended consequences is militia porn, pure and simple.
All you really need to know about this book is that the consequences that are unintended are that middle-aged white dudes are going to start another civil war or terrorist incident.
if they get unhappy with the government's meddling.
It's sort of half book, half threat, and 100% Alex Jones, Jack material.
The novel tells the story of Henry Bowman, a normal, everyday, peaceful gun lover who runs afoul of some shady ATF agents.
He does this by pulling a gun on an FBI informant at a gun show who pees his pants in fear, and the public humiliation drives him to get revenge on Henry.
The ATF somehow gets convinced to set Henry up, but because Henry's very smart, he gets the jump on them when they're coming to case out his house.
So when they show up, he ambushes them.
And from what I've read, the book is very graphic about how he...
Henry forces one of the agents to record a confession video, which is definitely a false confession in reality, but in the world of the book is probably meant to be Henry getting proof of how wronged he was.
So Henry then burns their ATF van and shoots some helicopters out of the sky before meeting up with his buddies to discuss how they should start a war against the feds using a leaderless resistance model.
So they decide they're going to start this war against the feds using leaderless resistance.
They post a false confession video, that one they got before they decapitated the cop, in order to agitate the militia community.
And people begin doxing ATF agents.
And what do you know?
Henry makes a declaration that all ATF members, any judge who upholds gun laws, and all cops or elected officials who are against their interpretation of the Second Amendment is guilty of treason and subject to execution.
Multiple Congress members are murdered, one by Henry's friend Cindy, who was a victim of sex trafficking, but met Henry at an AA meeting and decided to start prostituting herself to pro-gun control people and killing them for Henry after he very likely killed her pimps.
And keep in mind, those murders happened before his run-in with the ATF, so the idea that up to that point he was some kind of a peace-loving gun enthusiast is bullshit, which kind of hurts the entire conceit of the book, which was that he was a good man who was pushed too far by an oppressive government, when in reality he was actually already a mass murderer.
The rest of the book is largely about these gun-loving patriots systematically killing, ultimately concluding with the patriots meeting with the president to negotiate, at which point they force him at gunpoint to read an executive order getting rid of all gun laws.
The plot is grossly childish, and more than that, just gross.
There's a lot of...
In a lot of the reviews I've read, it seems like he really graphically describes the murdering of these cops, seems to relish it quite a bit.
So here are a couple of interesting pieces of the book that I think are worth discussing, outside of just this simplistic, childish, militia porn angle.
Over the course of the story, Henry and his friends live through some real-world events, like Ruby Ridge and Waco, and less tastefully, the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising of 1943.
In the text, these events happen in the way that they're discussed in militia communities, not as they actually happened.
So there's a weird historical revisionism thing that's happening that blurs the entire narrative structure.
The story happens in our world, clearly, because there are events that happened in our world, but the Patriot Funhouse mirror of reality is the only point of reference.
In many ways, it's kind of like this book exists in the reality that Alex Jones creates on his program.
And that leads me to my next interesting piece of information.
This book literally, and by name, calls out support for Gun Owners for America and Jews for the Preservation of Firearms, two gun groups far more extreme than the NRA who were both early sponsors of the Alex Jones show.
I don't think you would, but your intention is something that is fucking violent.
A thread on an AR-15 message board asked if people had any recommendations for books similar to unintended consequences.
Pretty much all the responses are to read Enemies, Foreign, and Domestic, a trilogy of books written by regular Alex Jones guest and fourth-hour host Matt Bracken, who predicts a race war.
Although one thing that is fascinating to me, and it keeps coming up in my mind, and it never comes up on the show because it's the absence of something in his rhetoric, he doesn't talk about Muslims really at all in 2013.
He hates them so much now, I don't hear him complaining about Muslims at all.
The only times I've really heard it come up were a guest.
But I know from context clues, when he's talking about people who don't get sold guns at gun shows, he's specifically talking about Central American and South American immigrants.