Today, Dan and Jordan discuss the end of the last week on the Alex Jones Show. During this span of time, Alex went from being not-banned from a few social media platforms to being super-banned from them, so the gents discuss how Alex took the news, and what clues he may have given about how it went down.
Yeah, generally speaking, I don't like to have any advanced knowledge of Alex Jones related news, but when the fucking president tweets that Alex Jones should be back on Facebook, I'm out.
It's so weird to read that stuff now, like, compared to before we started this show, reading all of these articles now about Alex Jones, and I'm just going, like, you guys have no fucking clue.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I like this show, I'd like to support what these gents do, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking that button that says support the show, we would appreciate it.
So, Jordan, today, like I said, we're going over May 2nd and 3rd.
There's some fucked up stuff in here, there's some stupid stuff in here, and there's some weird trends that I'd like to try and disentangle.
I think my favorite part, though, somehow, is the over-editing, where they're cutting it so quick, and you're like, is he coming at me from, like, eight different angles?
That clip is only acceptable if it's a one-take situation, where it's like, huh, okay, I get that you're getting weird, but you only had a minute to shoot the commercial.
The fact that there's editing means there must be like 15 minutes of him rambling about fish oil.
So this is all nonsense, and these are just some of his junior varsity narratives that he's kind of let slip in favor of just yelling generally about the CHICOMs?
Looking for Trump's tax returns and then extracts them and then passes them to whatever the new WikiLeaks happens to be and they start being unraveled and disclosed.
unidentified
Nothing wrong with that.
I mean, if you're going to let Russia get away with what they did and are still doing, according to Christopher Wray, the current FBI director who said that last week, they're in our election systems.
We're worried about 2020, he said.
So, hey, let's have a great power contest and let's get the Chinese in on the side of somebody else.
Just saying that shows how absurd the situation we find ourselves in.
He very intentionally never plays that last part, which is just saying this shows the absurdity of the situation that is laid out in the Mueller report.
She's not in any way saying, hey, Chinese, come, Chinese government, come help us out.
So the reason this is important to me and the reason this is worth mentioning is that Alex never stops talking about how people use edited clips of him in order to misinterpret his words.
I think he thinks that the rest of it makes it worse.
Except for the end.
And I think that there's something to that.
I understand that you would hear that and say it's pretty clear what she's saying.
But a normal InfoWars listener with Alex's guidance through what she's really saying, what the context is, I think everything except for the end could be used.
So earlier we heard Alex complaining that the Chinese government, the Chinese communist government, the Chi-Coms, they own and control all the movies and movie studios in the United States.
I sent people, and I'm just going to leave it at this, two major film festivals.
Because I already knew this was going on, but they were in the meetings with these individuals this year at Sundance, you name it, where they said, We get money to demoralize.
We get money to make the most depressing, horrible, anti-American stuff we can, and that is our job.
And they're openly all competing with each other about who can be the most horrible and be the most evil, and they know their mission.
Right, and it's at an independent film fest, so a lot of those tend to have that kind of Oscar-baity theme to them, and everybody knows that the Oscars love somebody to torture themselves.
Then I remember being out in Hollywood in some movies and TV shows and things back when I even cared to be in them, like 15, 16, 17 years ago, and they'd say, you know who's buying up all the movie studios?
It's...
The Chinese government, they tell us what we can say and what we can't do.
Well, now that's all mainstream news the last five years.
So, Jordan, in this episode here on the May 2nd, like I said, later in the episode, Alex gets the news that he's been kicked off Instagram, kicked off Facebook, and we'll discuss the ban when it comes.
But in this next clip...
Before any of this has become public, before any of the news broke, Alex, I believe, gives us a hint as to what happened behind the scenes.
They're shipping in millions of people, hundreds of thousands of which have serious diseases.
And then if you link to medical reports put out by the CDC and even the Border Patrol, they put up notes saying it's fake news and block it on Facebook.
That happened to us yesterday.
I'll be showing you that.
I was just linking to ABC News and medical reports, saying that it's not unvaccinated, that's a hoax, it's the illegals.
So you have to understand, folks, they are demoralizing.
But he says that he got a warning of some sort that he was going to have these things, like this story was going to be taken down, or this post was going to be taken down because of the erroneous nature of the...
Okay, let's say, course of action, you've researched this.
What does the president need to do?
I mean, a very quick thing to do is, because they did start to fight, and they are criminals, and they are globalists, and we're the American team, is that Trump would decapitate, what, about a thousand of them in one day?
unidentified
I don't know if we want to decapitate, but we can certainly...
Obviously, they were going to make Hillary a dictator.
And thank God that we got Trump in, who is not a dictator.
But...
Clearly, they're not stoked about it, so what we should do is install Trump as a dictator and have him do what Hillary was going to do to us, to them, and then we'll take a vote.
So while she's come back, she's come back from taking care of family members who were ill and what have you, and I don't really want to get into her personal life at all.
It is what it is.
To the extent Alex is going to bring it up, it may come up here.
But one piece of her personal life that I do find particularly interesting is that in this next clip, Alex says that she hasn't read the news in a year.
She's like Rip Van Winkle if that story was about a guy who fell asleep for a hundred years and everything was this same when he woke back up.
Because InfoWars is, I mean, it's similar.
So, in this next clip, before Leanne comes in, because he's just sort of promoting that she's going to be in studio, Alex gets the news of his banning.
And I actually think that this is pretty smart.
His immediate response is exactly what he needed to do.
He just knows that people are talking about the fact that he's been kicked off stuff.
He's like, fuck, we've got to get ahead of this.
I need Drudge.
I'm not going to comment on it until the fourth hour, but I'm still going to fucking talk about stuff that's clearly related.
Like in that last clip, or not the last clip, but a little bit earlier when I told you he gives these indications of what was happening behind the scenes.
He said that he got a warning about this post about the idea that immigrants bring diseases in.
And like I said, I waited a little bit while longer and Alex got even more overt in this clip and it tells me everything I need to know.
He said literally that he was told that they might take down his pages because of his coverage of immigrants and how he was blaming immigrant populations for spreading disease and causing outbreaks.
Alex tries to defend himself then in that last clip by saying he was just covering a story out of ABC News.
So why is he being so pilloried for reporting true news, the reality of the world?
Why?
In fairness to Alex, there was a story on ABC News from February 6th, 2019, with the headline, quote, Patient Zero in measles outbreak is a foreigner, which is common as a way outbreaks start.
Based solely on that headline, Alex probably feels like he's reporting things fairly.
Clearly, this measles outbreak started with a foreigner, as the headline says, so it must be one of these refugees coming from Central America.
Those are the imaginary diseased masses that Alex obsesses about, after all, so it must be.
It's said foreigner.
If Alex had read the actual article, he would be aware that the main point of the story is not that.
Daniel Salman of Johns Hopkins University, quote, stressed that the foreign individuals involved in the U.S. measles outbreak are not illegal immigrants, but rather, quote, it's people who have enough wealth to travel.
There's been ongoing measles outbreaks in Europe for years, and it's largely because of vaccine refusal.
There's also, right now, a bit of an outbreak happening in the New York Orthodox Jewish community.
And the source of that actual outbreak was traced back to an individual who caught measles while visiting Israel, which is a super common thing.
Not catching measles in Israel, but catching interesting diseases while on vacation.
There are websites dedicated to helping people navigate exactly this sort of thing, providing travel alerts specific to whatever country someone's heading to so they can get the right shots and take necessary precautions.
Like, you just went to Mexico.
I'm sure you had some warnings of, you know, get this.
It's not a perfect system, this warning people, travel warnings and stuff like that.
And it's not like the government can enforce that sort of preparedness.
So sometimes people go to a foreign country, catch something, and unknowingly bring it back to the United States.
That's what this ABC News headline is discussing, which Alex is then intentionally misrepresenting in order to create his propaganda that immigrants have to be stopped from entering the country lest they infect everyone you know.
This is why social media companies would issue Alex a warning.
What he's doing is very, very dangerous.
This is nativist propaganda designed to dehumanize immigrants as diseased hordes that need to be repulsed.
Well, when you reflect on the early stages of Nazi propaganda that led up to World War II, one of the things that deserves to be discussed more, even if it's discussed every day, which it's not, but it could be, and you still need to discuss it more, is the fact that one of the primary goals of the propaganda was not just to elicit hatred of the Jews and Nazis' other targets, like homosexuals and the Roma.
It's far more important, or it was to them, as an early step to make the public not care about them.
To quote from the Holocaust Memorial Encyclopedia, During periods preceding new measures against Jews, propaganda campaigns created an atmosphere tolerant of violence against Jews.
The goal was to encourage passivity and acceptance of anti-Jewish laws and decrees as a vehicle to restore public order.
Propaganda that demonized Jews also served to prepare the German population in the context of national emergency for harsher measures, such as mass deportations and eventually genocide.
If you replace Jew with immigrant or Muslim or drag queen storytime participant, Alex Jones' propaganda is indistinguishable in intention and formula from the early stages of the Third Reich, and his tone and rhetoric is getting way scarier.
The fact that these platforms gave him a warning speaks volumes and indicates strongly that they were giving him a very undeserved benefit of the doubt.
They were trying to warn him that he was expressing ideas that mirror rationalizations for past atrocities and was doing so by misrepresenting an actual story, imagining that he might have done it by accident.
My suspicion is that he was given the opportunity to make a correction about his misreporting, and when he didn't and showed that he wouldn't, it became clear that he was intentionally engaging in a demonization campaign.
Regardless of the efficacy of banning someone from social media...
Alex deserves every consequence he's experiencing, and probably more.
All of those theories about Alex having an affair with Leanne, him hurting her, any of those sorts of things, that being the reason that she's gone, no one who criticizes InfoWars other than us know who Leanne McAdoo is.
I'm saying that I've observed message boards and places like that.
And the people who talk about the sort of stuff that they're complaining about are all InfoWars fans or former InfoWars fans who think that Alex dodges the Jewish question.
So, yeah, I mean, she's way off base in terms of who she's pointing the finger at, but the fact that a finger should be pointed to people's lack of empathy, I'll go with you on it.
I'll go with you halfway, but you need to look in the mirror and see what...
Had InfoWars not created a rabid fanbase of conspiracy theory-loving lunatics who go off at the drop of a hat on a message board screaming about all kinds of different violent actions that they want done, if they didn't have them...
Then would InfoWars employees not be harassed by them?
An InfoWars employee leaving to go take care of her ailing family members wouldn't be seen as something suspicious, except in that environment that you have been an active participant in creating.
But they know that I'm one of the hottest figures for decades attacked on the Internet by anti-Semites who are mainly leftist-funded who want to control the narrative.
At the time, he was completely denying the fact that his ex-wife, or his now ex-wife, had any Jewish heritage at all.
Now, he's totally fine with that being a big part of it, and decrying that people are talking about the idea that his kids are part Jewish.
And, I mean, you pointing out the right of return thing is sort of poking fun at the idea that that was a piece of Alex's own rhetoric.
It's silly to see how completely Inverted.
It is now.
And it's not because he's in the pocket of Israel or anything like that.
It's convenience.
He is looking for something simple, and this is an easy way to let himself off the hook for all of the, well, let's say...
Deeply anti-Semitic trends that go throughout his rhetoric and worldview.
Even if he doesn't say, I hate Jews or something like that, that doesn't mean that most of his ideas of who the globalists are aren't based on archaic anti-Semitism.
That doesn't let you off the hook for those sorts of things.
If we were able to, like, back in the day, you know, people were able to see the sky like that, it would really put how small we are in perspective and how the little trivial stories that they're forcing us to be really angry about.
These little people are making us focus on them and make them gods instead of just looking at the larger universe.
And by the way, I remember being in Monument Valley, Utah, when I was like 10 years old and staying up almost all night and drinking coffee with my dad because you could see satellites.
And you can also see, like, craft, whatever they were.
And it's like, whoa, this is, like, incredible.
We have to transcend realizing Hillary Clinton's not in charge.
Leanne is complaining about the idea that there are these stories about Alex Jones getting banned, and there's nuance in the story, but people are just going to read the headlines of the stories about Alex being banned and then believe bad things about Alex, which is crazy.
Your boss, who you're sitting next to, is the king of just reading headlines.
And has already said on this episode that Facebook gave him a warning about a story he was misrepresenting because, most likely, he was operating entirely off assumptions he'd made about a headline.
I mentioned a little bit earlier, in the past, these social media bans have been really big duds.
They've been really easy for Alex to get around, in part because he has a dedicated staff of employees who could keep making vaguely named pages whenever one of his main ones got taken down.
As Alex has said in the past, when they cut off one of my tentacles, three more grow back, which is definitely imagery that makes him sound like the hero of this story.
This particular ban may prove to be more effective.
As it's pointed out in an article out of Wired, Facebook and Instagram say that, quote, All their personal and professional accounts, or any accounts that appear to represent them or their organization, are no longer permitted on either platform.
The, quote, any account that appears to represent them part is going to be devastating for Alex, I believe.
I have zero faith in social media outlets to protect their users, and I have zero faith in them following their own rules.
We'll see what happens.
But it takes a little more than this for me to say Alex's days are numbered.
It might be another matter for a couple other people involved, namely Milo and Laura Loomer, who were banned along with Alex Paul Joseph Watson and Infowars, and Paul Nalit, that white supremacist anti-Semitic dude.
The two of them, Milo and Laura Loomer, may actually be at the end of their respective grifts.
And really, the reason becomes clear in circumstances like this.
Their only skills are agitating.
If they're really journalists, a social media ban wouldn't impede their work, since they could write a devastating piece on their own website or blog.
And if they're actually any good and sourced and based on accurate information, it would be shared and picked up by at least a number of independent places.
You could get something in The Intercept if you were actually doing some sort of good work about this.
If they were concerned about the stigma...
That they might have with their name, they could use a pen name, like actually blacklisted writers did in the McCarthy era that they coincidentally think didn't go far enough.
They're supporters of the McCarthy era.
Without the help of these tools of immediacy, like the idea of live streaming and things like that, people like Loomer have nothing, and they know it.
I empathize with her freaking out, and everybody's making fun of her, and spoiler alert, we are going to talk a little bit about that towards the end of this episode.
I don't want to make a mockery of someone who may very well be having a mental health episode.
But make no mistake, what's behind the freakout that she's having is not, oh no, the globalists are winning.
It's, oh no, my scam doesn't really work without Periscope.
The panic comes from the recognition that this is the end of the road for her con.
And also, for anyone concerned that we, as a podcast, are going to somehow be affected by this ban, have no fear.
Facebook said that, quote, users will be prohibited from sharing Infowars videos, radio clips, articles, and other content from the site unless they're explicitly condemning the material.
I think our condemnation has been pretty explicit up until this point.
So they're using, and it's not an automated algorithmic tool, but what they're doing is anybody who posts, like, people who appear to be representing them, disseminating their content, just taken down.
Alex is running an organization that at this point is primarily motivated by inspiring white Western terrorism and apologizing for it when it does happen and making excuses for it, and also deceptively selling fish oil.
So if a private company is deciding to treat him correctly, then good.
Fuck him.
This isn't a free speech issue in the least.
And ultimately, the irony of the situation is the only way that Alex can argue to reverse the decision is to try and get Trump to help him with executive orders.
For years, he's screamed bloody murder about an overpowered executive branch and the evils of the federal government encroaching on businesses.
And now, possibly his only hope to stay afloat as a propaganda machine is to advocate for the federal government to step in and dictate what speech is or is not allowed by a private business.
Alex would basically have to argue against free speech in order to save his supposed right to be on Facebook, which should be fun to see him bend himself into a pretzel to see.
No, we gotta kill free speech now, and then we'll save it later, when we all get angry enough that we don't have free speech, that we're like, okay, Trump, give it back now.
I just realized, because you framed it that way, it's basically an episode of House.
In order to save his patient, House has to kill her for a minute.
But, alright.
So...
I guess to put it briefly, because I think that the things that I said there might sound a tiny bit contradictory or a little bit all over the place.
I would distill it to say this.
I think that Alex has the resources at his disposal currently, whether it be the employees and the built-in infrastructure of being able to have people take his stream and broadcast it super easily.
I think he has those things at his disposal that will make a ban incredibly difficult to stick.
However, the fact that they're saying that they're going to treat this like a way that they could knock down these dummy accounts and treat it like a terrorist organization, I think that that's inspiring in some ways.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
We'll see what happens.
Not super optimistic about it.
I think Milo and Laura are completely fucked.
I think they're done with whatever hustles they've been on.
Because Milo relied entirely on Mercer money, which went away as soon as he got kicked off a bunch of stuff, and he wasn't an effective mouthpiece.
He had no infrastructure.
He was only being able to publish his books and disseminate them because of that funding.
So without that, and now without Instagram, I don't see...
Alex has found out that him and PJW were kicked off the social media, and it starts to dawn on him that maybe he's done.
unidentified
So is the crew ready to get laid off for me to go about this close?
Well, I feel like you've built up the operation enough that you have really great people on this team that would be able to allow you the time to recharge.
I mean, what you have here, I think that this is really important as a piece of this.
Alex is so unhinged as a person, and so unmoored from any kind of bearing, keeping him in place, that over the course of this show, you do hear him screaming about decapitating his enemies, and then a little bit later being like, well, you know, I'm talking about, who does war games in here?
And then once he gets kicked off social media, it's a whole different animal.
Now they're deploying what the Associated Press is calling today human rights committees into every major corporation like MasterCard, like a bioethics board that decides who lives, who dies.
To where they're going to surveil with AI your purchases on MasterCard, and if they don't like what you're buying, they'll turn customers' cards off now.
It's not take MasterCard away from Alex Jones, or take it away from Laura Loomer.
That's already happening.
It's take MasterCard from you.
You're like, well, I'll go to something else.
No, they're buying it all up.
It's here.
Mark of the Beast, folks.
Whether you believe in God or not, it's happening.
And these people are reading Revelation, the last book of the New Testament, and they've decided that it's an owner's manual, that it's an operations guide, that it's a blueprint for something they're building.
And they're doing it.
They're manifesting it.
They're building the system.
And the churches won't say a word because they like all their digital stuff.
I love the mental image of somebody, like there's a room in MasterCard where they're all sitting around with the Book of Revelations going like, alright, so we got the first seal open.
The story, as I understand it, is that MasterCard is putting these, or they're at least having conversations about these human rights commissions as part of their board.
It wouldn't turn off your account or anything.
It would be reject transactions to places that were like ISIS.
I mean, not ISIS specifically, but you know what I mean.
If you're going to donate to the Proud Boys, they would just cancel that transaction.
And so the second one that he's putting forth is that now, if you're on this bad boy list, they're also trying to make it so you can't use phones and text people anymore.
And this is something that he's basing off a clip of Oliver Darcy being interviewed on CNN about his Alex's and all these other people's bands.
I've got bug eyes like Cookie Monster, so it's okay.
And now he says they shouldn't be able to use telephones.
That's right, text messages.
It's coming.
unidentified
And banning from Facebook and Instagram, correct?
Yes, Facebook obviously owns Instagram, and so someone like Alex Jones had been banned from Facebook a while back, last year in the summer, but he was still having a presence on Instagram, and that had drawn a lot of scrutiny from people who were saying, hey, you know, you guys banned him from one of your platforms, why are you allowing him to have a presence on Instagram?
And so, yes, now Facebook is going to be banning Alex Jones and Infowars from not only their main platform, Facebook, but also from Instagram.
I checked in also to see if these people would be banned from...
WhatsApp, which is also owned by Facebook, and a spokesperson cannot say immediately because it's, I guess, unclear whether some of these people have WhatsApp accounts, according to the spokesperson.
In that interview, he's not calling for Alex to be kicked off WhatsApp, because there's a really decent chance that Alex isn't breaking the terms of WhatsApp's use.
I've been on air 24 years, and I think that Israel's a better nation than a lot of those other nations, and there's no reason to turn it over to the Islamics.
They'll blow it up.
They'll fight over it, like they always do.
But the point is, to say that I'm anti-Semitic, it's in all the news.
It says Jones Band, Washington Post, New York Times, everywhere, for anti-Semitic posts, and he's anti-Semitic, is really sick.
So back in March, Alex posted a piece of art on Instagram that played on a whole bunch of anti-Semitic protocols of the elders.
Zion-style tropes with the hashtag WakeUpAmerica.
The email chain that was discussed in an article on Business Insider had to do with the very clear messaging of that piece of art and the way it was being presented and posted on Alex's and Infowar's Instagram account.
And the discussion was whether or not the post itself broke their community standards.
One member of the policy team clearly pointed out, quote, this image is widely acknowledged to be anti-Semitic and is a famous image in the UK due to public controversy around it.
Because Jeremy Corbyn had commented on it and then got a lot of blow...
And he was like, I am so sorry.
I did not look closely.
That is fucked up.
I blew it.
That post was taken down.
The one from about a month ago.
But that has nothing to do with the current issue Alex is dealing with.
And we know that's the case because on the last episode from May 2nd, Alex said that Facebook gave him a warning and that it was his pushing of the immigrants bring diseases narrative that were the problem.
This has nothing to do with his very real anti-Semitism.
But that's an issue that he can muddy the waters about very easily.
The anti-Semitic issue is so much easier for him to manipulate than the very idea that I got a warning about this, my behavior, and I refused to acknowledge that I was wrong and correct my behavior.
You can't rally people to your defense if the truth is I got a warning about a dishonest and clearly fucked up story that I was pushing.
I was trying to demonize migrant populations and intentionally misrepresented the story.
I got a really gracious...
I offered to correct what I was putting into the world, and I said, go fuck yourself, and then they kicked me off.
It's really hard to garner any kind of support from the president, from mainstream conservatives, those sorts of folks.
It's really tough.
It's much easier to say, I'm being accused of anti-Semitism, and I'm not.
They don't even give any proof of it.
It's all just because I'm a conservative and I support Trump.
It's just all demonization.
They hate my free speech.
It's so much easier to play that game.
And if Alex hadn't have accidentally slipped on this episode, he didn't know the ban was coming, so he said that he got warned about this exact same thing happening.
If he hadn't have said that, I probably would have no idea.
Every time there's a lawsuit, there is undoubtedly...
Some sort of a please stop.
We know in the case of the Sandy Hook case, there absolutely was a please stop that he just didn't give a shit about and ignored.
I'm certain, and we know that James Oliphantus and Hamdi Ulukaya, even though those lawsuits did progress to a certain extent, they did still give him a chance.
He has been given every opportunity to do the right thing, and he never does.
These are just the consequences of the way he does business.
So they say if he could be designated a hate figure, we could ban him.
And then a month later, they get it all packaged, all ready, and roll out with an anti-Semitic angle in their press release but never show proof because it wasn't there.
So see, this got countermanded by mid-level managers.
A month ago.
But then it went up the flagpole and folks said, just go ahead and go with the plan.
They go, well, he never said anything that we could lie about.
So, Alex is saying that a month ago he had this brouhaha, this little dust-up with Instagram because of this very notoriously anti-Semitic painting that he posted with the caption, Wake Up America.
So in this next clip, I just kept this in largely to reinforce how willing Alex is to use his kid's Jewish heritage now because it's convenient to him, whereas before he pretended that they were not Jewish.
I want to be clear, because I think it could be, not easily, but it could be misconstrued that I think it matters in some way because we're talking about it, and I do not at all care.
I think they should live their lives, and I think they deserve every ounce of privacy about who they are, their identities, all that stuff that children deserve.
I am only interested in the way Alex uses...
I don't know.
I don't know.
mental breakdown.
I do not believe that from the evidence that I can see that That she is having a sincere mental breakdown.
If I'm misreading that, I empathize with what she's going through and I apologize for making fun of it.
But based on what we're about to listen to, I think she makes it a little bit too clear that she's just mad that she's not making money anymore.
Like in this first clip, I really think that she's being too overt that this is about money.
Is anyone giving me money to fund my lawsuit in which I'm suing Twitter and CARE because CARE, which is a designated Islamic terrorist organization tied to...
Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood lobbied Facebook and Twitter to ban me.
Like, do people not understand that those of us who have been silenced have actually taken legal action?
See, but the thing is, these lawsuits aren't real.
They know that they're not going anywhere.
So, like, they can do these sort of performative aspects of hiring sort of shifty lawyers in order to make it look like they're going for it, but they know that they don't.
I don't have anywhere to go.
This is a hustle in and of itself.
The lawsuit hustle is something where it's like, hey, give me a ton of money and I will pretend to fight the people you don't like.
And in the intervening time, I'll continue to garner attention towards whatever I do through periscopes where I handcuff myself to the door of Twitter or go to the lobby of Facebook.
Demand someone see me?
So, Laura Loomer there in that last clip says that she's suing CARE, the Council on American Islamic Relations, and she says that they're designated as a terror organization.
Now, when you hear that sort of a statement, the obvious first question any right-thinking person should ask is, designated by whom?
In November 2014, CARE was designated a terrorist organization by the United Arab Emirates in a move that caused experts from all over the world to say, what the fuck?
UAE's former, or their foreign minister, Abdullah bin Zaid al-Nayan, admitted and explained when asked about it that, quote, our threshold is quite low when we talk about extremism.
They go ahead and just designate just about anybody as a terror organization, and you know why?
Because of accusations that UAE was wrapped up in the financing of 9-11, and allegations that they were trying to open an embassy for the Taliban back in 2013.
The UAE has been incredibly gun-shy about the idea of being associated with terror groups, so that kind of informs their terror group designations.
So the rest of the world has been very opposed to the designation of CARE as a terrorist organization.
Well, I should say the rest of the world, not including Ted Cruz, who has unsuccessfully lobbied for the U.S. Designate CARE as a terror group multiple times.
The fact that Laura Loomer is intentionally misleading people about this should tell you all you need to know about her intentions.
Her saying that they've been designated as a terrorist organization without pointing out that it was in 2014 by the United Arab Emirates and the context surrounding that means that she doesn't give a fuck.
Now, it's been said that CARE has an association with Hamas, but it's important to know the details there, lest Laura Loomer be allowed to run a propaganda game on you.
CARE co-founder Nahid Awad voiced support for Hamas in 1994, which predates Hamas's designation as a group associated with terrorism in 1995.
After that point, CARE has condemned Hamas pretty consistently, with Awad saying in 2006, quote, I don't support Hamas today.
Right, so she's using a smear, or not even a smear, I guess it's accurate to say that the co-founder supported Hamas, or voice support, in 1994, but pretty consistently the organization has not.
As for the Muslim Brotherhood stuff, as best as I can tell, that's just a catch-all conservative attack.
Whenever there's someone a right-wing propagandist doesn't like who's at least vaguely Middle Eastern, they generally say that they're associated with the Muslim Brotherhood.
I've seen this play out over and over again with Alex, and I can't find any credible sources that link care in the Muslim Brotherhood, so I just got to assume that Loomer's soft bullshit is more of the same.
So the lack of any real credible source of a connection with that, the idea that the connection with Hamas is so deep in the past and something that's very understandable and not...
Something you could really introduce into court to make them look like a terrorist organization.
The fact that you would have to sue them in the United States and they're not recognized as a terrorist organization in the United States.
The fact that she knows that that's only in UAE that they're designated that way.
When I hear in the same interview that this is like, I need people to fund my lawsuit, send me money, because I'm suing CARE, who's a terrorist-designated organization, she knows damn well that lawsuit's never going to work out.
Where were all the conservatives the other night when I projected your name and Infowars and everybody who has been banned onto the home of Jack Dorsey?
I assume they don't want to be involved with your gross publicity stunts, like when she went and hung out in Nancy Pelosi's front yard.
All this stuff is like, she doesn't understand that maybe some of the people not supporting her is, I mean, part of it's substance and part of it's style.
It's a little bit of both.
Her argument is bad, but the way she's making it is also something that you don't want to be involved with the girl who She handcuffed herself to one door instead of two at Twitter, and then the cops told her, like, eh, you can stay, you know, if you want us to come unlock you, we'll come, you know, whatever, just give us a call.
And then she just stood there and was like, oh.
And, like, all the employees could still get in and out of the door.
I don't, like, I think that we've gone down such a strange world with, like, in terms of, and road, in terms of what's acceptable, that, like, that becomes, like, huh, I wonder, is that not okay?
Yeah, and I don't think she deserves any sort of treatment.
I don't think anyone deserves...
Targeted harassment of any kind.
I do believe that she's probably been the recipient of some of it.
In the same way that Leanne McAdoo and Alex have been the target of spurious rumors, I would argue that a large portion of the attacks that she get probably come from her own side.
But some from the left, too, and I think that's inappropriate.
But larger, and much more importantly, the ruined life portion of it, Comes from her work.
There was a time when the con man could come to a town, do a con, and then disappear, and cut their hair, or if it's a guy, he can grow a mustache, change your name, no one knows.
Now in the days of the media, as it is, and social media, you can't.
You are screwed.
In a lot of ways.
And I do feel bad for Laura because she is 25. And I believe if we go back to the first time we ever talked about her on the podcast, one of the things...
I saw it in your face, and I felt it when I listened to this.
It's uncomfortable to listen to someone behave this way.
The two things that I think are worth it and why this is uncomfortable, and I know it is, and I'm sure people listening are experiencing it as uncomfortable.
The reason that I think it's important to still listen to this and still discuss it are two things.
One, What you're hearing is the scam fizzling out.
When someone is at the end of their rope, what they do is yell about how the people within the movement and everybody else isn't supporting them and they need to send them money instead of being like, well, I had a good run.
I guess I'm going to lay low for a year and then come back as Lauren Lumiere or something like that.
It's the bitterness and the anger of Recognizing without accepting that you are at the end of the con.
And I think there's something interesting there.
And then secondarily...
It's super interesting to see how little Alex gives a shit.
This sincerely empathic response to Alex's bullshit is so mirrored by Alex's lack of empathy towards Laura, who needs him to have some kind of, like, we're going to get through this, or like, you know, hey, I know it feels dark.
And he's giving a little bit of that, like, it's a war.
What she's embodying there is that, what you were talking about.
No one cares that I can't make money anymore and I've tarnished my reputation.
I have a degree.
I deserve.
Your work has not...
Your own principles are being very, very contradicted by your...
What you feel you're entitled to and especially when like these these folks and info wars entire thing is like hey I know all you scientists have degrees, but you're wrong about global warming.
But the best she could have received in terms of an actual journalism education is to have a minor in journalism, which Barry does offer.
But they don't offer a major.
even used in Barry University's page of available undergraduate majors is in the descriptions of how their philosophy, English, and communications programs are kind of related to journalism.
Gotcha.
unidentified
She apparently might have also attended Mount Holyoke College at some point.
I've seen that on a couple websites, but I don't know if that's 100% true.
unidentified
But that School does have a journalism program, but it's a journalism program that they run as an independent study program that students can enter with a faculty sponsor.
But even if she did go to that school, which I'm not entirely sure she did or not, she didn't graduate from there.
Ergo, she doesn't have a journalism degree.
She wasn't in a journalism program for her to be at the top of her class in that she graduated from.
Also, when Laura was in college, she was already working with Project Veritas, which anyone who studied journalism probably would be adverse to doing.
While at Berry, she attempted a stunt where she tried to trick the school into starting a, quote, humanitarian pro-ISIS group, where she went around and talked to, you know, professors at the school.
And because of that stunt, she was suspended from the school, and one of the professors who she filmed without permission filed a criminal complaint against her.
If she'd ever taken any real journalism classes, that whole dust-up probably could have been avoided.
So, like, the freak-out that you're seeing is there's a part of it that's kind of real, and that part is something that I don't want to belittle, and I don't want to mock.
But so much of it is just, I don't have a money stream anymore because my scam is ruined.
Line for me to walk in terms of what I want to make fun of and what I want to just point out.
Like, she's clearly lying.
This is all just about her scam blowing up.
And it's difficult as an external observer to really know exactly what's going on.
You know, like, I recognize that there's a decent chance that she does feel like her life's not worth living without the notoriety, celebrity, cash flow that social media offers her.
Because it's much easier than doing real work.
I recognize that there's a possibility that she does feel that way, and it is a real mental health issue.
At the same time, I also recognize that she sucks, she's terrible, she says really fucked up things, and it's equally possible that she's saying that to make people think that this is an extreme situation and they should rush to her aid.
I don't know.
I don't know.
If it's sincere, then I hope she gets help, and I would not mock someone actually struggling with things.
When you hear someone appear on Infowars and make it so much about how, like, no one's supporting me, everybody needs to give me money so I can do this bullshit lawsuit against this group that I've demonized because they're Muslims and I've decided that they're terrorists.
And then she ends with, like, I don't want to live the rest of my life because I have to worry about being killed by leftists and Muslims.
It's entirely possible that my bias is coming in and I'm not able to empathize with her the way that I would be if it was somebody else.
Maybe I'm far less willing to give any kind of actual...
I would say, like, time and effort into truly empathizing and trying to figure out just based on her performance, which is currently what I think it is.
If there's a mental illness aspect that drives Alex to do what he does, how much should we calculate that into our assessment of it?
I do think that it's appropriate to empathize with the struggles that people go through, even if they're monsters.
You know, you shouldn't mock somebody for human struggles, even if they're someone that you disagree with and you think does bad things.
If it's mental illness that's leading Alex and Laura Loomer to go down these roads, as they do, and they continue to do so unapologetically and don't seem to give a shit about that aspect of it, how much are we required to care?
We got Trump elected, and all the parasites came in.
And just remember, it's better than Hillary, but I understand.
Well, keep doing it.
Let's get you back on soon.
Let's get back on tomorrow about what you're doing next, how folks support you, and we'll track this as it unfolds.
But I know being called an anti-Semite.
My Zuckerberg and all of them is painful, and I know it hurts, and I know it's a lie, and I know you feel alone right now, but it's always darkest before the dawn, Laura.
Because, like, I'll grow 100 feet tall and take these guys on, but, I mean, that's literally, when you give us money and you spread the word, I get stronger, they get weaker.
But if you want, you know, I think it's always interesting to look at these things as they happen because Alex gives clues as to what's going on.
He accidentally reveals pretty much most of the stuff that's happening.
And when you look at this, it's clear that he was given a chance to not be banned and he did it because it reinforces that message of persecution and helps him.
with the same scam that Loomer's running.
With her pretending that she's going to sue Care, Alex can do the same thing with Business Insider and Facebook.
all these fake lawsuit hustles.
You bring in tons of money from people by pretending that you'll be their champion and fight their perceived enemies, when in reality you're probably just pocketing it or using it to fight the lawsuits that you're being sued.
So, I don't know.
I think it's all a load of bullshit.
I mean, that's basically where I stand.
I support Alex being kicked off whatever platforms decide to kick him off.
I stop short of calling on anybody to kick him off because I think it's the platform's choice.
And I think that history will show it's the right decision to make.
I mean, at the point that we're at with the...
The towing the line of ethnic cleansing and the outright violence he's allowing to be expressed and advocated for towards LGBTQ community folk, I do think that you have a potential of things going really badly.
I'm not saying it will, but on the chance that it does go really badly, 15, 20 years from now, it's going to be a really bad look to have not made a decision when you could.