Today, Dan and Jordan have had enough of 2019 Alex Jones for this week, so they retreat to the past to continue their investigation into Alex's behavior in the aftermath of Sandy Hook. In this installment, the gents meet a truly insane small town police chief and find Alex coming off really petty about media bookings.
The true irony of this is this is the only time I've ever seen you writing down on your notepad before the show started, and I asked you, what are you doing?
But a lot of people probably are going to be listening to this on Friday and asking, Hey, Dan, what about how Alex Jones is on his L.A. tour through podcasts?
If you're out there listening and you think, hey, I like this show, I like what these gents do, I'd like to support them, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show.
He's still saying that the kids were killed and all that stuff, but the government went in, killed Adam Lanza as a patsy, left him there, all that stuff.
But he doesn't really care all that much about it because he's now saying that the government and the globalists are going to use that as a way to take everyone's guns intentionally to start a civil war.
So now everyone's up to speed pretty much with where we're at as we jump in on the 4th.
I wonder if we're going to see a development of that theme, or maybe we're not.
I mean, RT, really, I saw a video they did yesterday, really trying to defame me, and it was just so pathetic that I don't even know if I'll respond to it.
I mean, they know we have a bigger audience domestically than they do, so it's an attempt at that, but RT, the last eight months, has really taken a turn towards authoritarianism and is shameful.
So in a turn that I bet no one was expecting, Alex is temporarily very mad at RT, the entire country of Russia and Vladimir Putin, in this episode.
Alex really isn't specific about what he's complaining about.
He said they ran a piece that was defaming him.
I can't find this.
I don't know what he's talking about.
So I'm kind of left out in the woods here trying to put the pieces together.
My guess, if I had to speculate, is that Alex feels betrayed that RT isn't screaming bloody murder about the prospect of the introduction of gun legislation in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook shooting.
It makes some sense for him to feel that way.
If you go back and look over RT America's videos from the era of 2010 to 2012, the network is lousy with Alex's friends and narratives being amplified.
Webster Tarpley, Gerald Salenti, Adam Kokish, Paul Craig Roberts, Peter Schiff, Wayne Madsen, and Alex himself are super frequent guests on the network, and the messages they propagate on the network are the same as the ones expressed on Infowars.
Looking over this archive, it doesn't seem all that weird to imagine that Alex thought this network was a true ally of his, and it could lead him to feel and cast aside when he feels like they aren't joining him in this battle, which he's built up as being the thing that'll lead to the end of American civilization.
You could feel like it's possible there's going to be a little bit of rejection there.
She's doing really well if her sister had to repeat very well off twice in an interview.
That means she is making beaucoup bucks from that divorce.
The day of the shooting, RT was reporting outright gossip that wasn't true at all about the tragedy, which is not cool.
Within a week, however, Liz Wall started reporting on how suspicious it was that the NRA hadn't made a comment publicly or tweeted in the days after the shooting.
She did a piece on December 18th about the idea that it's possible that the NRA wasn't as powerful as everyone thinks, pointing out that in the 2012 election, of the over $10.5 million the NRA spent, only 0.83% of that money actually went towards successful outcomes, either supporting a candidate who won or opposing a candidate who lost.
I don't know if that's accurate as a statistic, but it's what she was reporting.
Don't worry about the fight that these people are threatening.
But that interpretation would be bullshit, as saying that that's indicative of what RT was putting out.
On December 19th, RT America aired an interview with Jim Stashoek.
I mean, he has a weird name to pronounce.
They interviewed him about how gun control wouldn't be effective and his tyranny.
They credited Jim as a, quote, constitutionalist and freedom advocate.
In reality, Jim is a fucking lunatic who has posted videos of himself online ranting about how immigrants are, quote, invaders, parasites, and vermin, then burning a Mexican flag.
He's posted videos where he literally advocates shooting Black Lives Matter protesters in the back on sight and displays for the camera a bullet with BLM written on it.
He posted a video of himself outside a mosque in Augusta, Georgia, with a gun yelling, death to Islam.
He's literally told his followers, quote, if someone is a member of Antifa, people, it's time to be lone wolves and retaliate against this attack.
Retaliate as a lone wolf.
Before this appearance on RT, he had already been arrested multiple times and was on the Southern Poverty Law Center's list of dangerous members of the Patriot Movement due to his involvement with the American resistance movement and the Georgia civilian militia, as well as his deeply bigoted radio shows that tended towards incitement towards violence in his listeners.
RT had every reason to know who this fucking nutcase was, and yet in the aftermath of Sandy Hook, they had him on as a guest to be a voice against gun legislation.
On December 18th, Abby Martin did a segment on her show, Breaking the Set, about how the media was sensationalizing and exploiting the shooting, something that Alex agrees with entirely and has expressed as much on his program.
RT correspondent Anastasia Cherkina laments that the media got so many details wrong about the shooting and their reporting, which is kind of funny because the other guest on the show is Liz Wall, the same person who four days earlier said on RT that Lanza worked at the school.
Oh, and then on December 19th, RT interviewed Alex's good buddy, Paul Craig Roberts, where he espoused the belief that the government needs to take the guns away so they can fully bring in a police state.
At the end of the interview, he even suggests that Sandy Hook may not have been real.
As he says at the shooting, quote, These events, whether real or not real, are simply helpful to take away the guns.
So, at this point in the episode, Alex brings in, you know, he continues his trend of having gun weirdos on his show to agitate and make people afraid that their guns are going to be taken away, and, you know, his bench apparently isn't that deep, because Larry Pratt is back again.
is just so fucked up just as a way of thinking because what they do is they take the memory of someone who died heroically in Sandy Hook and then try and rewrite her actions as being like, what if she had a gun?
So, one of the things that Alex is trying to do, and he has been doing pretty consistently throughout this entire period since, you know, he sort of focused a little bit on his position on Sandy Hook for a couple days, and then since then has been just like this gun paranoia.
And in that entire time, one of the things that he's used to defend himself and be like, this isn't crazy for me to be going down these roads, is the idea that there are bills being introduced.
In order to take away people's guns.
Now, in order for this argument to work in any way, there have to be at least the perception that these bills are a credible threat to your gun ownership rights, right?
I mean, like, if you know that there's no chance these things are gonna pass, you don't really have a good foot to stand on to stoke fears, right?
I mean, that's kind of a rational way to look at it.
Um, I suppose, but then the argument back against that would be, if you're not, if you get complacent and you aren't constantly fighting back against this, then it might pass without anybody's, you know, you think there's no way that it's going to pass, but if you don't keep talking about it, maybe they'll do it when you're, only three people voted for the Federal Reserve, Dan.
It turns out that one of the reasons, I believe what I suggested at the beginning of this episode is probably a large part of why Alex is mad at RT, by extension Russia.
But Alex presents a second explanation in this next clip.
And the reason that I don't take it as really what's going on is it's absolutely not indicative of reality.
One is that in 2012, that was when Putin reascended to the presidency.
And so Alex saying in January 2013 that a year ago there were different policies, well, I mean, in the sense that Medvedev was president, and Obama, they were trying to do the reset of relations and stuff like that.
Obama and Putin had a much different relationship.
It was much more standoffish and hostile.
And then you've got to consider that in December 2012, that's when the Magnitsky Act was put in place, that sanctioned a bunch of...
It was not good between Obama and Russia.
In the time period that Alex is talking about right now.
Yeah, and the way Russia's economy was going, they really couldn't even afford that much red paint to put all those hammer and sickles back on the tanks, man.
But, I mean, as I was going through the archives of RT's stuff from that, when, you know, it's just crawling with InfoWars guests, it also, like, Sage Francis did an interview with them, and Sam Seder did a couple interviews, and Talib Kweli.
You know, like, so there's a lot of people that, like, even if they are asking because your beliefs line up in some way with the message they want to put forth, that doesn't always mean it's nefarious.
I'm just saying that whenever he says specifically, I go on there and say my own message, they don't control anything I say, he's definitely leaving out the part of, like, there's a reason they're having me on specifically and not, you know.
Well, he's not making up, he's misrepresenting stuff.
If I had to guess, it would be the cops in the woods, and one of them was dressed differently than the others, running in unison, appeared to be a chase.
And that is just something that is wrong.
But you probably could look at that video, someone would explain to you that that's not people getting arrested in the woods, you're wrong about that.
It wouldn't be like...
That video doesn't exist.
But I think Alex knows that that video doesn't show what he professes that it does, and therefore he can't point to that as being the, like, that's what I was going off of.
Well, and it's a piece of him justifying that the globalists did this, and that also that is part of the justification for him saying that they're doing it to take your guns to start a civil war, which is the only reason for him to be doing as extreme of a broadcast as he's doing in the world.
Yeah.
If he retracts one thing, then he literally has to say, okay, guys, sorry.
The products we've assembled and put together at InfoWarsHealth.com are the best out there for my research.
And the dramatic effects for Aaron Dykes, myself, and others are just amazing.
Just the energy level.
With the Beyond Tangy Tangerine, the Polymverse Plus, their special proprietary blend of essential fatty acids, the hundreds of products there at InfoWarsHealth.com are amazing.
And I need to do more to promote it because it also funds our operation.
And that's what I do.
I fund us, you know, not with Putin money, like RT.
I fund ourselves with stuff I believe in and I use.
So anything else you'd like to add about the Longevity products?
Well, it's definitely not a planted call that just suddenly happens to lead to a very detailed explanation of Infowars life and how you should become a partner.
I had something happen yesterday that both of you will enjoy.
I called Dianne Feinstein's office in Washington, D.C., and one of her young male staffers answered the phone.
I said, as per the gun control measure Ms. Feinstein is introducing today, I said, please give her my congratulations.
I had no idea she was a supporter of the Fuhrer.
I said, Adolf Hitler did the same thing to his people in 1934, and then we saw what he did to his people after he disarmed them, so I just wanted to give her a very hearty congratulations for following her guide.
Counterpoint, just from within Alex's rhetoric, would be he says that the guns have been taken from all countries except for, like, America and Switzerland or whatever.
Breaks down the fourth turning, and he's got a clip from the 90s where they predict the implosion of the market, how it would happen, what would come out of it, the tyranny, the awakening, the cycles.
This special report that David Knight is filing on this episode is about the theory of the fourth turning, which is based on a book of the same name written by amateur historians William Strauss and Neil Howe.
The book argues that there are generational cycles in our history which repeat like the seasons in a calendar year.
Since they repeat, they're predictable and always follow the same pattern.
Each cycle lasts between 80 and 100 years and is made up of four turnings.
So there's the high.
Which is a period where institutions thrive and individualism weakens.
Then there's the awakening, a period where institutions come under attack from a new regime of values, new ideas, value systems.
So then there's the unraveling, which is a period where individualism resurges itself, reemerges, and institutions decay, giving away to these new values that came about during the awakening.
Then there's the crisis, the fourth turning.
The period of upheaval when old values are replaced by this new system, and it's kind of a chaotic time.
There's usually wars.
We don't have time to get into a critical analysis of this theory here, but suffice it to say many people who have feel that it's woefully simplistic and seems not to explain how many historical events and figures don't fit into their handy and neat conceptions.
So there's a lot of people who are pretty critical of it.
One person whose review of the theory is not as critical, however, is Steve Bannon.
David Kaiser wrote in a 2016 piece in Time, quote, Though their hit theory isn't widely taught in colleges or discussed in the media, Strauss and Howe may play a major role in Donald Trump's administration.
Steve Bannon, the former head of Breitbart News, who has been appointed Trump's chief strategist at the White House, is very familiar with Strauss and Howe's theory of crisis and has been thinking about how to use it to achieve particular goals for quite a while.
I know this because Bannon interviewed both Neil Howe and myself in 2009 when he was making a documentary film about the ongoing financial crisis.
I don't like to get all spun out on talk about how Steve Bannon may be a supervillain trying to take over the world, inspired by half-cooked pseudo-historical prophecy books from the 90s.
So I'm just going to move on from the topic.
I don't think it's really super important.
It is weird, though, just to say that something that was a big piece of Steve Bannon's worldview was also a part of David Knight's worldview that he was reporting on on Infowars in 2013.
It is interesting, though, because based on what this Kaiser is reporting on in time, there is an indication from his interactions with Bannon that the idea of this fourth turning, this crisis and what have you, is something that can be used to your advantage.
Whenever there is a new regime of ideas coming in, the old being replaced by the new, if you...
Finagle things appropriately or correctly, you're able to make sure that your ideas are the new ideas that are implemented through the crisis.
I just think it's interesting to see these same ideas all over the place.
So in this next clip, still from the 4th, in overdrive, a caller is calling in, and he says that he wants to sabotage gun legislation by forcing any attempt to get new regulations and laws for guns, make sure that they also include something in the bill to get rid of the Federal Reserve.
Or that all federal buildings have to be gun-free and they can't have bodyguards.
disarm the secret service and they'll go well that's ridiculous exactly leave our guns alone filth you've already sucked the country dry well you know you we know you hate us you're not getting our guns we know you're criminals shut up shut up the game's over shut up celcius shut up stalin shut up new world order shut up queen of england shut up al jazeera Shut up!
Listen, the whole thing, if you ask me, my gut tells me it's all staged, and the Batman shooting, too, and we've got the proof, but it's just, I don't know if the public can handle it.
Coming up in 30 minutes, Police Chief Mark Kessler is going to be joining us with state-level nullification at the town council level.
In Pennsylvania, they are moving to get a law passed to mobilize their town against the globalists and violations of the Bill of Rights and Constitution.
And the Declaration of Independence gives them that power.
And he is coming on the show.
We found out he's a listener as well.
That's good.
It's good to know that there's a fellow liberty lovers out there across the nation and the world.
And that's what my plan, and Ron Paul's plan as well, has been nullification at the county, city, state level.
Nullification short of secession.
But if we have secession, it's not from the United States.
It's to have the states pull out of the federally occupied New World Order system and to re-upload the republic.
Alex's highly touted guest on this Sunday show is Gilberton, Pennsylvania, Police Chief Mark Kessler.
This is an interesting cat, this dude.
So he's on the show as part of Alex's parade of gun weirdos that he's having on to pretend that the government is just days away from taking your guns, you know, just out of your law-abiding hands, leaving only the hardest core criminals out there having guns.
I should tell you that in May 2018, Mark Kessler was sentenced to two years probation, and you might be asking yourself, what did he do to get those charges?
It turns out that on May 5th, 2016, Kessler tried to buy a gun from a Dunham sports location, but he lied on his application.
So you might be asking yourself what he lied about.
And it turns out he lied in response to a question of whether or not he had ever been, quote, charged with a crime carrying a possible prison sentence of more than one year.
The terrorist threats charge was allegedly the result of a complaint filed by a woman who attempted to pass Kessler's Hummer on the road one day, which apparently.
Quote, Kessler pulled alongside her, rolled down the passenger side window, and began to scream at her and use obscene language, according to the criminal complaint.
The woman recalled Kessler telling her, quote, What are you doing?
You're lucky my kids are here.
You know what would happen.
The woman said Kessler began to pull away, but suddenly stopped, backed up, and reached down, pulling out a firearm to show her, according to the complaint.
The woman said she is scared Kessler may seriously harm or kill her, especially since he acted that way that he did with young children in his vehicle, according to the complaint.
I'm not 100% sure how these cases ended up in court, but it really doesn't matter.
They were pending when he tried to buy this gun, so he absolutely lied on that application.
These outbursts occurred in 2015, when it seems like Kessler wasn't in such a good place.
That might have been because he was fired as Gilberton police chief in September 2013 after he posted some videos on YouTube of him firing a bunch of guns and yelling about how, quote, all the libtards take it in the ass.
Because he made these videos of him shooting off a bunch of guns, talking about libtards taking it in the ass, and referring to a dummy that he was using as a target as, quote, Crazy Nancy, the Speaker of the House.
But these videos were so bad for business and so embarrassing that even the Oath Keepers stopped working with Kessler after outlets began covering them.
So we're legitimately living in Wild West times, and he's a black hat police sheriff who needs a fucking David Carradine to ride into town in order to solve this problem.
Mere months before he got himself fired as police chief, here he is on Alex's show, full of hope for the future, not knowing the pile of shit he's about to step in, all because he's a complete lunatic.
Oh, also, I should tell you, in 2011, he shot himself in the hand while he was at a bar.
And in 2013, he was sued after his son shot a BB gun at a bunch of kids at the Frackville Recreational Complex, which led to a young girl needing to get surgery to remove a BB from her leg.
Which might not be relevant, except he was the guy who was the fucking police chief who made YouTube videos of himself indiscriminately shooting guns all over the place and screaming.
So when his kid does that with a BB gun, it kind of makes you think, maybe he's, you know, doing what daddy does.
If you said everything I own, congratulations on doubling your net worth.
That is a fake quote.
The Thomas Jefferson Foundation has investigated that quote and variations on it, like, quote, the people will not understand the importance of the Second Amendment until it's too late, and ruled that they find no evidence that Jefferson ever said anything like it.
They consulted all of his collected papers, his published writings and correspondences, and found nothing.
I like the idea that it's such an awful, stupid quote.
That they went out of their way.
They're like, well, maybe these idiots who make up quotes all the time may have read something in one of these obscure documents of Thomas Jefferson's, so we better go through everything.
The quote doesn't appear in any published form until 2007, when it appeared in a book called, quote, On a Hill They Call Capital, A Revolution Is Coming, by a guy named Matt Carson.
We don't allow anybody into our militias who has not also put a writer on a bill trying to get gun control legislation that would also abolish the Fed.
If you don't do that, we can't trust you to throw down.
Hey, the globalist-occupied government is doing a bunch of stuff that we feel is illegal, so we're going to do things that we feel are legal that are against the law.
I don't care.
They're just talking in circles around each other, and there's much more important issues.
In 2011, he was sued by Councilman Robert Wagner after Kessler arrested, strip-searched, and held Wagner in prison for six hours.
What had Wagner done?
He left a terse voicemail on Hannon's machine, which he admitted, quote, wasn't pretty.
So here's what happened.
Wagner called Kessler to complain about teenagers racing ATVs in front of his house.
But he couldn't reach Kessler, so he called the mayor and left a message that got a little bit heated.
He explained that the racing was dangerous and he was taking a lot of heat from neighbors to get it taken care of since they knew he was on the city council and he had some sway.
Wagner swore a good bit in the voicemail, but it was about the kids racing.
He's like, these fucking kids racing and stuff like that.
He wasn't threatening or verbally harassing the mayor or Kessler in any way.
This is a pretty open and shut case of abuse of power where Kessler very literally arrested Wagner for exercising his First Amendment rights.
And Wagner was awarded $15,000 in judgment when they sued both Hannon and Kessler.
Oh, boy.
So, there's a good chance that the mayor supports Kessler because she's just as fucked up as he is.
It's not clear whether or not she directed Kessler to arrest Wagner, but it is clear that she signed off on the arrest, which was completely without probable cause and constituted a purely retaliatory act.
I think that was just harassment of him and humiliation.
This happened a year and a half before he was appearing here as a guest on Alex's show, where Alex is kissing his ass and holding him up as an example of someone who's going to save the Constitution, when in reality, he's literally an example of a corrupt cop who uses his position to deny someone else their constitutional rights.
So what makes this appearance of this guy, this Kessler, on Alex Jones' show even funnier?
Is that about a year after he got fired as Gilberton police chief, Kessler made a pathetic attempt at doing some brand rehabilitation by claiming that his insane YouTube videos were only made as part of an undercover operation he was involved in with the feds.
Well, Kessler appeared on Fox News Radio with Alan Combs, where he said, quote, I was sent out for, well, I can't really say exactly who, but I was sent out by agencies to go out and attract and investigate what I could do to find out who's who and what's what among these groups.
When I say groups, I'm talking about Second Amendment groups, patriot groups, alleged patriot groups, militia groups, all sorts of groups.
He told Combs that he didn't believe the things that he was saying in those videos.
Right, and now my operation is done with these videos, and we've lured out some dangerous elements so I can publicly declare on Alan Combs' show that I'm a snitch.
I think he's 100% lying about working with the feds.
I think he 100% believed the stuff that he said in those videos.
But his story about being undercover working for the feds is just his way of trying to save face because he realized that this right-wing grift he was trying to work isn't paying out the way he wanted to.
That fake reality show that he claimed he had signed a contract for wasn't happening.
He wasn't making any money.
All that sort of stuff, so fuck it.
Let's try and shift gears.
I just think it's really funny, though, because no matter what, even if he is lying, he is...
If you go through message boards now of these communities, they're like, we thought he was great, turns out he's a fucking snitch, he's a rat.
The only thing that makes it a Sting, it's not believable.
It's 100% not.
But the only thing that makes it more robust than just I was making videos where I shot things, and that's how you lure dangerous people in, is that he was trying to build a militia.
Federal court ruled they can't bar Chicagoans from owning guns to defend themselves, so they're striking back, as any globalist would, to just take every gun we've got.
My goodness.
And they're going to use this as the model with an executive order the Washington Post reports yesterday, Saturday, to just have Obama sign an order taking our guns.
And his plan is to start a civil war.
These people are criminals.
I'm sorry.
Go ahead, sir.
unidentified
Well, that is what's happening, Alex.
Well, see, the General Assembly with this vote, because this is a dirty tricks vote.
If you know any history of Illinois, see, they're going to bring the General Assembly to session in the House tonight at 5 o 'clock.
It's Rachel calling from beautiful Seattle, Washington.
Hey!
Just wanted to tell you two things.
One, that I recently got a bird feeder.
And I really think that if all the alt-right dickheads and Nazis just like sat down and watched the birds for a little while, the world would be a much better place.
The other thing I wanted to tell you is that every time Ted Anderson is on the show, I'm picturing, like, Mitch McConnell mixed with, like, Doug Dimidome.
Are the guys in Washington who are doing the whole, we're not going to enforce the gun law that Washingtonians just passed, are they just doing the same Kessler thing?
Story of him being passed and then, like, screaming obscenities at the lady and about to drive away and then stops because you can hear the wheels turning in that story of him being like...
I bet she's not threatened enough by me.
Maybe I need to pull out a gun and make sure that she gets the message, don't pass me?