Today, Dan and Jordan discuss the April 5th episode of The Alex Jones Show, where Alex makes a public overture to the QAnon Crowd. Unfortunately, that is a very small part of the episode, which is mostly just Alex being really gross, and behaving in ways that will probably get people hurt.
I just wanted to jump in real quick before the episode to give everyone a fair warning about the content that is upcoming on this episode.
We cover an episode of Alex's show that has a lot of gross stuff that Alex has to say about child abuse and a lot of anti-LGBT sentiment that he is expressing.
And if any of those things are things that you are very sensitive about, I wanted to not blindside you with any of this stuff.
I know Alex says...
All sorts of horrible things, pretty much any episode that we listen to, but some of it's particularly gross on this episode, and so, hey, you know, you deserve to know what you're getting into, I guess.
Watched the 35th WrestleMania, and because everybody needs to know my opinions on wrestling, I'd like to give a shout-out to a couple of my favorite moments from the show.
Now, granted, I thought that Kofi Kingston winning the championship was fantastic.
I thought it was great, but I knew that was going to happen.
There's no way leading into that that I thought for a second that Daniel Bryan was going to retain the championship after that build.
There was such a weird racial overtone to the build.
The idea of Vince being like, people like you don't become champion and stuff like that.
That sort of idea.
If Kofi lost, it would send the weirdest storytelling message.
I wouldn't put it past the WWE, but I also thought if they want to move forward, I really don't think that has much storytelling potential.
So I loved that moment, and I loved the match, and I thought it was great, but again, I expected it.
what I did not expect was there's this guy named Elias.
Okay.
unidentified
And his whole character is that he comes out with his guitar and at the beginning of his run he would come out and sing songs making fun of the city that he was in.
He started to turn into a good guy for a bit, and then the people who write the show couldn't figure it out, and he's back to being a bad guy or whatever.
But his segment at WrestleMania was amazing.
So what he did is he had a video, right?
There was a pre-recorded video of himself playing piano and drums.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I like what these guys do, like to support the show, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show, we would appreciate it.
It's my way of being able to get a tattoo that signifies the time of this show and this sort of thing, but without ever getting anything that looks like Alex tattooed on my body, which was the struggle to figure out.
So, before Alex gets to saying what he has to say about QAnon, he spends the entirety of the rest of the episode talking about something that I don't want to go over, but we got to.
So wait, just real quick, Alex there at the end says that he's doing it as well.
So if he gets sued over this eventually, then he's saying he's doing it as well.
He can't hide behind this.
We didn't investigate Sandy Hook.
We just repeated other people's stuff.
So that's good to note ahead of time because I think that what he's doing...
Could end up leading, first of all, to people getting hurt, and second of all, to a possible lawsuit.
So one of the things that I need to point out before we get into any of this is that he doesn't know the details of the cases at all that he's talking about, and he's just making stuff up to fit his narratives.
For instance, one of the people that he's talking about here committed their crime at the age of 16, so their records have been sealed.
And Alex can't possibly know what actually happened in that case.
And in the other case, the offender was punished with five months probation, which seems like not the punishment you'd get from the crime that Alex is describing.
I don't know the details of it, and Alex can't either.
And neither can the people that he's getting this information from.
He's making a lot of assumptions in order to make it salacious to his listeners.
That's fucked up.
Beyond that, this is not the way I would have chosen to start this episode, but I can only really follow Alex's lead and respond to whatever he throws in my way.
In this case, we see that he chose to lead off with talking some real gross shit about the Drag Queen Story Hour, something that will play a major role in this broadcast here from the 5th of April, Friday episode.
Honestly, I turned this on, and like I told you, my first thought is, nope, no need for this, but there's nothing else to do.
Owen Troyer is hosting on Monday, so here we are.
One of the reasons this is particularly off-putting is because Alex isn't just making things up, but he's twisting and manipulating a kernel of reality into something horrendously bigoted.
Two drag queens associated with the Houston Story Hour, the Houston Drag Queen Story Hour offshoot, have been revealed to be sex offenders.
And Alex is taking this information and running with it to commit a horrible composition fallacy and argue that all of the queens are thus pedophiles and they're out to get your kids.
There are a number of issues here, and just so no one gets twisted about any of this stuff, nothing I'm going to say in this episode at all is defending the idea of letting sex offenders be around children.
That is, at very least, an unnecessary risk, and definitely is inappropriate in a public library setting, for instance.
That is not what I'm taking issue with here at all.
I am concerned about this.
I sincerely am.
But my concern has zero to do with the Drag Queen Story Hour.
It has everything to do with Houston.
Drag Queen Story Hour is not a national organization with a corporate structure where the crew in each city is the same on different dates, like they go around touring.
There's a central organization with independent chapters that people have organized in cities around the world.
There's a page on their website where you can reach out and start your own satellite chapter if you want to, and it seems like a pretty easy process.
In March, when the first sex offender was discovered, the Houston Public Library released a statement about this news.
Quote, In our review of our process and of this participant, we discovered that we failed to complete a background check as required by our own guidelines.
We deeply regret this oversight and the concern that this may cause our customers.
We realize this is a serious matter.
Running background checks on people who apply to run events is the responsibility of the venue, as is clearly discussed on the Drag Queen Story Hour's website on the page about starting your own chapter.
Quote, So their position on it is we...
We understand that there'll probably be background checks, as there should be for everyone, and we are a part of everyone.
It's not a story of drag queens being sex offenders or pedophiles.
It's a story about inappropriate levels of screening and oversight, specifically in the Houston Public Library system.
The second sex offender that was just recently discovered, and Alex is responding to in that clip, also was involved in an event at the Houston Public Library.
So that's my position on this.
If Alex and his ilk want to complain about this, the thing to complain about is the Houston Library not following their own procedures.
I don't know the stats on it, but that very well may be the case.
and the other issue too is that like the actual drag queen story hour organization doesn't know who all of the people who are participating in the events are yeah they probably are in communication with the person who's organizing like let's say the Seattle chapter of it or whatever and then that person subcontracts out the responsibility of finding the people to be involved.
There is a gap here in terms of oversight, but it's not a problem with the event itself.
So now another issue here is that the information Alex is working with is all coming from a group called Mass Resistance, which the SPLC lists as an anti-LGBT hate group.
And from what I can tell, there's good reason for that.
The group was founded in 1995 under the name Parents Rights Coalition, but changed their name to Mass Resistance in 2006, quote, when our role as the true resistance to tyrannical government became clear.
The word mass in their name is short for Massachusetts.
And in 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage should be permitted.
And then Governor Mitt Romney was reluctant to stay.
Mass resistance passes themselves off as, quote, pro-family as a group, but if you scratch beneath the surface at all, or just look at the surface, it's super clear that all they really give a shit about is agitating against LGBT rights and access to abortion.
They support conversion therapy, which they call reparative therapy.
They believe that anti-bullying initiatives are secretly just about indoctrinating straight kids into being gay, which is the same complaint that they have about straight gay alliance organizations.
Their president, Brian Kemenker, has a weird habit of comparing those who support LGBT rights to Nazis.
Like when he said he wanted LGBT activists, quote, destroyed because they, quote, would send us to concentration camps if they...
Also, in October 2008, 48-year-old Michael Olivio, an employee of Mass Resistance, got into a little bit of trouble for creeping around outside West Middle School in Andover, Massachusetts and taking pictures of students.
I'll read to you from the Andover Eagle Tribune.
This is actually kind of funny.
I mean, it's not, because this guy's a creep.
But the way this plays out, if there's anything that's pretty funny on this episode, it's probably this.
So this guy who was working for Mass Resistance, their argument on it was that there was a gay-straight alliance meeting that was happening at the high school, and he accidentally went to the middle school.
No one can possibly know except for this dude, this Olivia dude.
So beyond that, all that, in a November 9th, 2018 post on their own website, and I have to stress this, their own website, mass resistance kind of admits to being liars, trying to demonize trans people.
Our side concocted the bathroom safety male predator argument as a way to avoid any uncomfortable battles over LGBT ideology and still fire up people's emotions.
We just wanted to avoid these, you know, the argument that we're gonna lose, we wanted to avoid that but still flare up people's emotions.
So we came up with this bullshit that demonized a bunch of people and really, I mean, it got a lot of people hurt and made people feel like other things.
That should give you some sense of the kind of dicks who are behind the reporting that Alex is operating off of.
You know, we have a guy who ran naked away from a school after the police told him to leave when he was taking pictures of kids, and the sort of organization that's very willing to, on their website, say, we were bullshitting here, trying to demonize trans people.
While it does appear true that there are two sex offenders who were involved in a drag queen story hour, specifically in Houston, and that is not good.
There's also no justification for demonizing the LGBT community or drag queens with that information, which is what Alex is going to proceed to do throughout this entire episode.
One final thought, and this is pointless, as we know that highlighting hypocrisy in people like Alex never really matters.
But what he's doing is identical to the thing he accuses the left of doing to gun owners.
When a gun enthusiast goes off and shoots a bunch of people, Alex screams bloody murder about how you can't blame all gun owners, which indicates that he understands that it's not right to apply the sins of an individual to the group that they're a part of.
He knows what he's doing is bullshit, but he doesn't care, because it creates a potent emotional appeal to get his audience to hate the group that he wants them to hate for his own purposes.
And so that brings us up to speed with what the actual story is.
If I recall correctly, Alec got manslaughter for that.
Like, I don't think it was a murderer.
He's not a convicted murderer.
But be that it isn't May, let's not dwell into that.
The only other possibility I can come up with is that he's referring to a September 2018 blog entry on Christian Post about how Franklin Graham was against the story hours.
The blog post includes discussion of Hochi Mochi, a drag queen who describes their persona as, quote, your resident killer clown from outer space.
This was also covered all over right-wing media, including posts on WorldNetDaily, among other places.
So it's clear that it's something that Alex very easily could have come across.
This person whose persona is a killer clown from outer space.
In terms of people getting a little bit violent in their language about the story hours, though, I submit to you.
Pat Robertson.
He got on his show not too far back, The 700 Club, and he decried the mainstreaming of the LGBT community, comparing it to what happened in Sodom and Gomorrah.
Quote, This was the original crime that led to the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, and the United States of America is on a very slippery ground.
It's not just some library that's going to be in trouble.
It's the whole population when God brings judgment.
Robertson went on to say, So Pat Robertson is sort of insisting that this will bring destruction to all of us if we allow it to continue, which, if you think about it, that justifies hurting these people.
And then, of course, we have James Green of Texas, who got arrested back in February for showing up to the Freed Montrose Library with a gun in an attempt to stop the drag queen story hour.
In his words.
Attempt to stop it.
He was a self-described Trump supporter and claimed he was being arrested after he had made a big scene.
He got arrested and he said it was because he's a white Christian.
I remember growing up reading the Bible and hearing Jesus say, you should turn the other cheek and you should forgive even those who have transgressed the most upon you.
The thing that most people leave out of that verse is the parenthetical, unless you really feel like I told you that I wanted you to commit vengeance, in which case gather up a posse, start investigating, and murder if you want.
So, in this next clip, Alex is in the middle of reading a list of, like, news articles about, you know, just acts, crimes that he's ascribing to Muslims, and then asserting that these news organizations don't point out that the people who committed these crimes are Muslims.
And he brings up one that I take particular issue with, which we will discuss.
In a couple seconds on the other end of this clip.
So you can hear there from that, the point that he's trying to make is, they don't say it!
They don't say that it's Muslims!
The article that Alex is referencing as hiding the fact that the perpetrators of this crime are Muslims is actually one of the articles that we went over when we were discussing the reality of the grooming gang narrative and how it plays into the anti-immigrant and anti-Islam propaganda that's on the rise around the world.
While Alex is correct that the headline doesn't identify the gang members this woman was victimized by as Muslims, that fact is brought up in the sixth sentence of the article and is mentioned repeatedly throughout it.
The only conceivable way for someone to think that they were covering up the fact that these particular criminals were Muslims would be to literally not even try to read the article and just assume that headlines are all that exists.
Now, it bears repeating that this article was written by a survivor of one of these gangs, and her perspective is being disrespected by how Alex is using this article.
From the text, If anything, rising anti-Muslim hate will probably make groomers stronger in their convictions and drive ordinary young Muslim men toward fundamentalism, grooming gangs, and terrorism.
This survivor even directly discusses Alex's good buddy, Tommy Robinson, and his bigot group, the English Defense League.
For Tommy Robinson and his followers to focus on an entire religion based on the cruel interpretations of some scriptures by some people is unhelpful, to say the least.
Most grooming gang survivors I know absolutely condemn anti-Islamic hate, and we're uncomfortable with English Defense League protests.
We certainly don't want random attacks on all Muslims.
You can't cure harm with more harm.
Alex is pretending that he's standing up for victims of these crimes, but in reality, all he's doing is trying to demonize the entirety of Islam, and the way he's doing it is particularly distasteful.
I mean, really think about this.
What he's doing is taking the first-hand account of a survivor of the crime he's so upset about, lying about it by pretending that that account covers up the fact that the perpetrators were Muslim, then arrives at a conclusion that is in direct opposition to what the writer, a survivor of this crime, advocates for.
This is an abusive level of non-journalism and just so clearly indicative of what he's all about.
That combination of very real, disgusting thoughts being surrounded by this ironic sense of, look at how much fun I'm having.
If you just heard...
If you heard that was the first one, if that was the first clip of Alex's that you heard, it wouldn't surprise me at all if you were like, oh, see, he's just being an asshole.
He's doing this to, like, rile people up, and you guys are just overreacting because you're all...
Ladies and gentlemen, if there was an army of financed pedophiles and their supporters dressing as clowns and disguising themselves, being given access to children as young as three, convicted pedophiles, would you want to know about it?
Would you want to stand up against it?
Or would you be like local Houston News that laughed and said, gotta get them while they're young?
A lot of folks are joining the globalist team right now.
A lot of people are showing the world they're willing to do whatever it takes for their father Lucifer to give them power.
I think that Alex probably dodged another defamation lawsuit by just saying local Houston News and not saying what he's talking about because no one said that.
The only thing that comes close to approximating that is articles that people have written about the idea of upending bigotry by having association with and awareness and contact with people of different lifestyles, different identities, different races, different occupations even.
That sort of thing does lead you to not have whatever prejudice take over in your mind.
Like, let's say, just on a very simple level.
You can't think that all...
Construction workers are stupid.
If when you're younger, you meet construction workers who are nice and thoughtful and kind, that sort of thing, you will have a positive association with construction workers that stereotypes won't be able to penetrate.
And that's the argument of get them while they're young.
That's the only place where that argument has ever been used.
It can't be that obvious that he knows he's trying to get people killed.
Because what you are doing is...
You're not calling an entire group of people an army of clowns raping your kids.
You're not calling them.
They don't have names.
Since they're not actually an army, but you're telling people that they are, the only thing that the people who hear it think is, well, if they're an army, we have to make our own army.
And, well, you know, a preemptive strike because we can't allow them to rape another kid before we do anything to them.
So Alex has Tracy Shannon from Mass Resistance, and here is her first volley, I would say, in the interview where she argues, I think, I think what she's arguing is that the First Amendment does not protect drag.
unidentified
The First Amendment is not there to protect lewdness and professional sexuality, sexual behavior, and ideas that are reflective of adult sexual content and promote sexual...
If they want to keep doing this, because they always do this reactively, they're always like, the First Amendment doesn't protect this, the First Amendment does protect this.
Then, before we even start with any of those arguments, before you start doing this in single servings...
If the right wing wants to fucking put down a goddamn list of what the First Amendment, they think, protects and doesn't protect, then we can have a conversation about it.
He's horribly against tyranny unless it's the tyranny that upholds his bigotry and the positions that he wants to be reinforced, which is the status quo of white male supremacist heterosexual hegemony.
So if she wanted to take this information that she'd found and demand that the Houston library system do a better job and actually do the things that are in their protocols to begin with that they failed to do, great.
And when you find failings in that screening system, it is important to point those things out because then you can improve the screening system and thereby eliminate the problem that you ostensibly are upset about.
And if you don't focus on the things that can actually make a difference, it does reveal that you don't actually care about the thing that you're presenting as caring about.
So Alex at the end says that LGBT means pee, which we know what he's talking about.
And then she is saying that these people cannot be criticized in any way, and I believe that that applies to the whole LGBT community, which seems to imply that you think that this is a subsection of it.
That's great, because that really shows some cards of what she thinks she's working with and working against, which is why this ostensibly okay thing, which is doing the oversight that Houston's library system failed to do, turns incredibly bad.
Because your motivation is not fixing the holes in a system, or...
Doing secondary checks or whatever.
What your interest in is demonizing people in the LGBT community.
And that means that the directions you're going to go are going to be fucked up, as we already see.
She's allowing herself to be...
And she's probably thrilled to be doing it.
She's being used as a resource for Alex to do his...
That lawsuit got dismissed, so having failed to make any progress in the legal system, it appears that she switched tactics and decided to walk into the realm of propaganda and smear campaigns.
Judging by her Twitter account, before she got involved with this hustle, she was basically just an angry Trump fan, tweeting out everything that's in line with that media sphere's narratives.
Interestingly, she seems to retweet almost everything Charlie Kirk tweets, which is an impressive level of saying.
I was going to dig in and try and find out more about her, but after seeing this little glimpse and remembering that she's involved in a group that literally admitted on their own website that they make shit up to demonize the LGBT community, I realized there wasn't much of a point in looking into her more.
So Alex is implying that Sylvester Turner, the mayor of Houston since 2016, is compromised.
And that's why he's supporting the Drag Queen Story Hours and the LGBT community in general.
In order to make this claim, he brings up the 2017 Super Bowl, which was held at the NRG Stadium in Houston.
There's a little scandal around that Super Bowl, as Turner used taxpayer funds from Houston First, the city's tourism board, to pay for himself and 16 guests to attend the game.
However, that story was reported by Houston's ABC affiliate approximately a month after the Super Bowl, so I'm not sure how that could be used to blackmail him.
That is just sort of like a foible.
And, you know, it came out.
unidentified
Did he have to, like, pay it back and all that stuff?
So, I have my suspicions that what Alex is really doing here is he's trying to attack the sincerity of a government official who's changed their position on LGBT issues.
In 2005, Turner voted against allowing gay and lesbian people from being foster parents.
In 2003, he voted to ban same-sex marriage.
As recently as 2013, he, quote, voted against a proposal to gather statistics on bullying incidents based on sexual orientation and gender identity, which was part of what got him a D rating from Equality Texas.
However, he's since changed his tomb.
And as of 2015, he has an A-plus rating from Equality Texas and has been a vocal advocate about supporting complete equality.
Turner has said, quote, I think many Americans, if not most Americans, have evolved over the last 10 years on LGBT issues, and I include myself in that group.
People evolve, and I think that's what we want people to do.
That's one explanation, though a more cynical reading may be that in 2015 he was running for mayor, whereas before he'd been a state representative with a 27-year tenure whose position was far less vulnerable to having shitty positions.
So there might be a little bit of a cynical explanation for it, or he might be sincere.
I'm not entirely sure.
Whatever the case, Alex can't allow the possibility to exist that someone was anti-LGBT rights, then learned more, heard about the issues, talked to people most affected by those positions, and then decided to change their ideas and their positions.
That's threatening to his worldview.
So to assuage that fear, he has to introduce the idea that anyone who comes around to supporting LGBT rights is most likely being blackmailed.
It's a really dumb idea.
But one that's low-key, far more dangerous and insidious than it might first appear.
Like, that clip, you could probably breeze past it.
The idea that, oh, he's probably compromised or whatever.
But what's behind it, I really do believe, is the fact that he changed his position on these issues.
Yeah, you know, it's like I voted for this guy for, you know, over and over and over again to be a state representative, and he was really anti-gay, and then he started talking to people and changed his opinion, and I respect him, so maybe I should try to talk to people and change my opinion.
No, he was blackmailed?
Okay, then never mind.
I hate him now, and I don't have to think about it ever again.
So at this point, we have the conception that these people do all this X, they become empty vessels, demons come in, and here's where it goes from there.
The last thing they see is they're hacked up and torn into pieces, and as their blood is slovenly licked into the mouths, and no men will stand against them.
And when the men watching this show stand before God, God's going to say, I don't know you.
And they want your children not to run when they're in the disguises and the van pulls up.
They want them to have already been at story time five or six times so they've learned to stop just long enough to be grabbed off that front yard because the kid didn't listen.
As you can see from Alex's conception, he believes that the idea of this drag queen story time hour is in order to make kids not afraid of the people who are going to throw them in vans later, which is fucked up.
That is so fucked up.
I mean, because it's just the way of repurposing what it really is.
It's a way of reframing the idea of acceptance and Embracing people and making it sinister.
Which I guess is kind of what he does all the time.
But it's so overt.
And the correlation is so easy.
Or the connection between reality and his lie are so easy to see.
It's so fucked up.
And then when you attach it to demonic ideas and the idea that they're only trying to prepare your kids to be kidnapped.
So this next clip's a little longer, but it is what I would describe as absolute insanity.
I know that Alex is somewhat performing, but also this is not, like, there's something that he's tapping into that is deep-seated within him, and it's incredibly gross.
There's some blood libel-y ideas in here, too, again, but this is just absolutely ludicrous.
So this guy's expressing that there's a thousand-year criminal operation that the Democrats are in, and they're afraid that Trump is going to blow that up.
One thing you say that I like is you don't need orders from headquarters?
Well, a civilian, a parent or a legal guardian, doesn't need the police, in my eyes, being a cop.
To go to the school and grab that drag queen and drag them out in the parking lot and dispose of them.
If you're in that school and you're in kids and somebody's not stopping it, I should have the legal right to go in there and put you down without repercussions.
You have now on my show twice in two sentences, or maybe even one run-on sentence, said that you should have the legal right to murder these people because you disagree with their lifestyle, with their identity, however you want to frame it.
Whatever it is, this guy, and I don't know if you caught that, he's a cop!
At very least, Alex has a fucking responsibility to be like...
And he's like, you know, we're going to run their plates and follow the law.
Whatever.
No, he has a responsibility to say...
Absolutely not.
You do not have the right to kill people just because you disagree with them.
But he can't, because earlier in the show, he said that they want to prepare your kids to be thrown in vans, and they're going to drink their blood and feast on their flesh.
That sort of thing can't exist in a moderate world.
It can't exist in a place where what you're prescribing, what you're advocating is...
Let's follow the process and make sure that the library is actually going through with the background checks that they're supposed to be going through so we can make sure that whatever potential damage or whatever potential possible damage is mitigated.
Because these people, like the Houston Library, also put out a statement that was like, we fucked up and all that stuff.
We didn't follow our own process.
But in that same statement, we already have in place, whenever there's anything that has to do with kids, any event with children, nobody is left alone with children ever already.
There were no complaints about any of these people.
There was no incident.
But we're not using that as a way to say, we didn't do anything wrong.
So whenever we talk about a lot of this stuff, like taking it quite seriously throughout this episode, the things that Alex is putting into the world, the ideas, the rhetoric that he uses, one of the reasons is because it exists with this.
This caller being on the show is not a surprise to me.
The caller expressing ideas like that is exactly what you would expect people who internalize and believe what Alex says to hear from what he's saying.
So whenever you are saying earlier in the episode, when you hear this stuff, how can you not think you should kill these people?
Because they are going to only...
They're harming your children.
Why wait until they actually do the thing that you're afraid of?
Whenever you say stuff like that, I think that people could hear you making a leap that is inappropriate or something like that, but it's not.
Because all we have to do is get to the end of the episode when Alex takes calls from his listeners to hear them having that exact same thought but not being afraid of that thought, thinking it's the right thing to do.
Because if someone calls in your show and expresses something like that, you have to recognize that that's a symptom of a major problem.
And that problem is something that you have a responsibility to deal with.
Because you are putting out the ideas into the world that's making people think things like this.
So you have a slight responsibility, I believe, to take a step back and have a bit of an educational moment where you can be like, guys, things have gotten a little bit out of hand.
I know I said that they were drinking blood, and I totally think that's true, but we live in a civilized society, and if somebody's drinking blood, you can't just go around killing them.
And one of the reasons that I'm very afraid of the idea that someone's going to hurt one of these people or kill them at any of these storied hours is that...
We have a clear example here of someone thinking it's okay to express that on a radio show, on a national radio show.
The discourse is so toxic and so dangerous that that isn't an idea that Alex even pushes back against.
It's not like when he comes back from break, he's like, wow, that caller said something.
It's just allowed to exist as something that isn't.
It's not something that is beyond the line.
And so the idea that someone might think like, maybe I should do this, it seems within the realm of possibility to me.
And if that does happen...
I do hope that Alex gets sued again.
Like, I know that when we started the show two years ago, I was very insistent about the idea that I think that Alex is on the right side of a lot of laws.
Since Trump, and they feel so energized and excited that it's almost, it's less possible and more fucking probable at this point that we're going to see a crime.
Alex's stupid ideas about where liberalism sprung from, it's even more recent than a thousand years.
Whatever.
I don't really care to engage with that.
I only think it's important because it's a teaser.
You hear that sort of an idea and you're like, oh, this guy's into something fucked up.
It turns out he's into QAnon.
And so he brings up QAnon and it leads Alex to clarify his position.
Love it!
And remember, this is the same guy who said that he should be able to shoot a drag queen who's at a reading at a library because he disagrees with them and he shouldn't be punished.
And one thing I was going to say about Q, he had a quote on there one time that said, there'll be a time when it is not safe for these people to walk the streets anymore.
And I got to tell you, what they're doing with kids, we know it.
There's some fake cues out there, but the main cue is right, and I made a whole apology about it, because what they said about Mueller starting to come true, and I have to actually eat crow, I just haven't figured out how to do it yet, that a large part of it is accurate.
I don't know if there are, but this is Alex's way to be able to accept the bigger picture of QAnon with still being able to say, like, no, I don't believe that.
I'm only going to attribute certain things to Q whenever I want to, and then a caller can call in and say something stupid, and I'll be like, yeah, that's the real Q. But I think Alex also is probably signaling in some ways that he's come to a point where he realizes that there's a very real possibility that...
The QAnon audience is bigger than his, and he needs to get in some of that.
I don't know exactly, because that's all that is said.
Like, that's all.
He said that he needs to eat crow, but he hasn't figured out how to do it yet.
So we can assume that that's forthcoming at some point, that he'll do a big message about his exact position on QAnon.
And when that happens, I'll look into it, and we'll discuss it more in depth.
But as it is now, I think there's some dangerous possibilities with this.
Like, the idea of that and Alex working in concert more than they have been up till this point could be fucked up.
It could lead to some pretty dangerous trends.
But we have to see how it plays out.
At this point, I really don't think that there's much to go on because it is just that clip.
He's blaming Steve Pachanek or Corsi for turning him against QAnon and now saying he's going to clarify later.
I don't know.
But I'm bummed out by this, just on a personal level, because it's weak.
But then secondarily, because now I've got to fucking look into QAnon.
Because if this doesn't get major attention and if this doesn't break through into the public's psyche, the globalists have a decent chance of killing the president in the next two weeks and taking over the media using the emergency alert system, the Obama kill switch that's still in place, to really...
Bring this country into a civil emergency, as they'll call it, but it's really martial law.
Now, in the last few months, I have followed, but never really spoken of, QAnon, or QAnonymous.
And a lot of what QAnon has said, I already have gotten separately from my White House sources, my Pentagon sources, my CIA sources.
The reason that I bring that back up is to show just a little bit of a only, you know, what is it, a year and a couple months, a year and a half ago or so.
That was the position and the official editorial position Alex had on QAnon.
It was anti because Zach was the real one and Zach was in the house.
So I bring this up because after Alex has made this point to this caller that QAnon, you know, there's a good version of it and I'm into it and, you know, I got led astray by people I trusted, he tries to bring Zack back into the proceedings and he claims that he's on the phone, but he never gets to him because I don't think he actually was.
In terms of fan service, I might bite the bullet and go ahead and do that, but I'm not interested in it.
I wasn't interested in this episode either, except for as a message, or I guess as something that is important to point out.
A lot of the stuff is stuff we've seen before, like rank transphobia, anti-LGBT messaging, the conflation of cross-dressing drag queen performance and trans folk, that sort of stuff.
We've seen that horrible rhetoric pushed out into the world before, but...
The directness of how much this is trying to get people hurt and then the caller calling in saying I should be able to kill these people if I want to with no consequences I think is a new level of demonstrable danger that Alex is perpetuating and putting into the world.
So I think it's worth discussing for that.
And then no one would have let us get away with not talking about Alex going back to QAnon.
But it's such a small part of this episode.
It could, in the future, turn out to be something major.
This could be the kernel of Alex pivoting some narratives and that being his new direction.
The where we go one, we go all nonsense.
He could, but that's left to be seen.
This could be a small blip and it'd just be a marketing ploy on his part in some way to tap into a fertile market that he feels he doesn't have access to.
But I think it's really important to keep it coming back up just so you're always confronted with the reality of what people are saying about the LGBTQ community.