Today, Dan and Jordan discuss how Alex Jones decided to cover the idea that Donald Trump was threatening to declare a national emergency in order to get his wall made. In a turn of events that will surprise no one, it all turns out being a very racist affair, where Alex makes it way too obvious that he really, really wants to serve a dictator.
Okay, now historically, when we've gone over a show, and then there's a live broadcast immediately after that, that live broadcast is drunken and angry.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I'd like to support this show and what these gents do, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking that button that says support the show.
And one of the reasons why I was a little bit reluctant to do any Alex Jones content this week was because, like I told you off-air, the 2009 stuff hit a little bit of a snag.
There was a little bit of boredom on Alex's part back then in our chronology, and so I didn't want to get into that.
And then at the same time, there was all this talk on...
Trump's part and in that world, that sphere, about the idea of Trump declaring a national emergency in order to get the wall made.
His reasoning is that he's slick and that sort of thing and an up-and-comer in the democratic world, and he thinks he's going to be the one who they try and unseat Trump with.
Super excited about the President of the United States declaring a national emergency in order to circumvent the other branches of government taking unilateral action to achieve a goal.
But you should understand that it's coming from a deep place in Alex's heart, and I think it's a place where he thinks the end is coming.
The end of his personal struggles, the end of his turmoil, his battles.
In many ways, I believe, listening to this episode, that Alex thinks that once Trump declares the state of emergency, it's game over for the globalists.
And finally, Alex Jones will not have to do this anymore.
So here is a clip that really leads me towards that.
So that humanity has a choice of what decision they want to make, to be seduced by the globalists and by the high-tech gadgetry of the Antichrist or God.
So, what you failing to recognize when you look at the conception of this final battle that Alex is envisioning is that no matter what happens, Trump wins.
And there's a bargaining chip of where, oh, if you just capitulate to what I want and build the wall, it'll be such a stinging defeat for the Democrats, Trump won't openly announce the emergency.
So there's a little bit of nuance in the parlance of the nomenclature and the symbolism, but either way, Trump wins by taking action.
The enemy came and sued for peace two years ago when he won and then lied the whole time and said, we'll work with you.
Just don't destroy us.
And then he just can't believe, like, you won't be destroyed.
You're criminals.
You'll still have your wealth.
And you still want to screw the country over because you've got some spiritual hard-on to defeat it?
Alex doesn't have a long history of being against eminent domain.
Look, this is all whack.
It's all very whack.
But what I have to insist is at this point on this episode, so much of this is not about politics at all in terms of what he's bringing to the table.
There's a deeply religious feel to it.
Whether it's talking about this sort of Armageddon-esque battle we're getting air in our lungs to prepare for, or this next clip where he just can't, like, he can't stop quoting country songs in order to demonstrate.
I'm scared of overheating and getting too aggressive and just being as wise as a serpent and peaceful as a dove until God executes vengeance through us.
Obviously, we're going to cover President Trump's live Oval Office speech at 8 p.m. Central.
9 p.m. Eastern, 7 p.m. Mountain, 6 p.m. Pacific.
Trump declares national emergency to save America.
So there'll be an hour break from the war room, and then you just go to Infowars.com forward slash show, or the main page, you'll see live coverage of that.
And I'm asking all listeners to go to Infowars.com and Newswars.com.
I'm going to ask Paul, and I'm going to ask Millie Weaver and others, because I'm banned on Twitter.
To tweet this image out so you can retweet it, so that people know that is coming up tonight.
Because we did predict it, we did lay it out, and it's going to happen.
Yeah, the way he was playing with the paper and talking about go to a website and stuff, now it was just, I'm banned on Twitter, so other people got to do this for me.
And also, it's clear, he's saying it repeatedly.
We know this is going to happen, we predicted it, all that stuff.
So that's the first thing from that clip that's important.
The second thing is what you hear there is Alex demonizing the Ninth Circuit with a lie, which is him complaining about the judiciary, complaining about the courts and how they're really bad.
But it's really important, and what's going on here, there's an interesting story behind it, and Mark Dice is being a complete jackass, and he deserves everything that came to him.
So Alex is saying that he got thrown off Facebook because of something that was deemed racist.
Facebook blocked me out of my account for seven days and censored this post because I simply stated the fact that the only reason that the story about the seven-year-old girl who was tragically shot and killed in Houston went viral is because the suspect initially was white.
So every Black Lives Matter activist on social media started tweeting about this terrible white terrorist who killed this poor innocent girl.
unidentified
Only it turns out that the murderer was actually a black man.
By now, they've all forgotten her name and don't even remember that the incident happened.
There's some sort of aesthetic style that he's going for.
Maybe he knows that him just sitting still isn't good for YouTube or something like that.
No one's going to be entertained by his dumb face.
So he moves around a lot in a spasmatic way, and it's very distracting.
But anyway, I watched Mark Dice's video, and suffice it to say, it deserves every label it's getting.
It is racist.
It's inflammatory.
And it's just a pile of shit from a quality standpoint.
Alex is playing this report saying that he's been kicked off Facebook.
But in the video, as we just heard, Mark just says that he got suspended for a short time.
Like, he just got a little time out.
So what I want to say is that these fucking snowflakes need to stop exaggerating their oppression.
Number one.
And here's the real point I want to make.
Mark's chief complaint seems to be that these Black Lives Matter SJWs were only interested in this story because they thought it was a chance to attack white people.
But the same is true of Mark Dice.
He's only interested in this story because it gives him an opportunity to defend white people and attack black people.
His only point is exactly what he's complaining about in these supposed other people, which is weird.
It seems like a bad starting point for your editorial position, but whatever.
Also, an added problem is he has no idea what he's talking about.
Seven-year-old Jasmine Barnes was killed in a drive-by shooting, and the family initially said the suspect was a white man in a red truck.
This turned out not to be accurate, as first-hand accounts often are, and officials from the Sheriff's Department have gone on record saying that they believe that there was a red truck at the scene, and this was a case of sincere mistaken identity, and it was nothing suspicious.
Also, two men were arrested for the killing, not one, as Mark is suggesting.
Also, Black Lives Matter activists didn't just blindly blame white people and then forget the story when the narrative didn't fit.
That's what InfoWars does.
In reality, Sean King, one of the leading figures of the Black Lives Matter movement, is literally responsible for tipping off the police that the shooters were Larry Woodruff and Eric Black Jr., not a white guy in a red truck.
Do you understand what I'm saying?
Because what I'm saying is that a prominent figure in the Black Lives Matter movement went out of his way in order to help police find the actual killers because he cared about the truth, not just scoring points making white people look bad.
So, if I understand the story correctly, Sean King received a tip from one of his confidential sources, and because of that tip, he found out that it was two black men, and so he, of course, sat on it and never told anybody, and instead...
Now, the case is a little complicated, because after a mugshot was released of the original suspect...
Sean King posted a picture of a man who looked almost identically like the mugshot and asked followers for more information on him if they had any.
This absolutely led to some unmerited attention and probable harassment, definite harassment, being placed upon this man, being directed towards him.
But it also literally led to the tip that solved the case.
As Sean put it, quote, I don't quite know what that means or how I feel about it, but the initial outrage, misguided as it was, is what eventually helped us find the killers.
So, if you're a white supremacist outlet like InfoWars, Mark Dice, or The Daily Caller, you can focus on the part where Sean initially posted a picture of the wrong person and made a mistake in good faith, and just ignore the later part where he followed through, righted the wrong, and acknowledged that the initial assumption of the case was inaccurate.
It's all a game these assholes are playing.
They simply don't give a fuck about what's true.
And people didn't forget about the story or that this happened.
Jasmine's funeral was on Wednesday, and from all reports, it was packed to the rafters.
Plus, no one who was upset about this when the suspect was white is now okay with it because the suspect is black.
The people who organized Justice for Jasmine, the rally in Houston, they aren't just calling it off now that there isn't a race angle to it.
What's going on here, and what Alex is putting forth in his defense of Mark, is deeply troubling.
Because later in the video, Mark starts throwing around some statistics about shootings and how it's all black people doing.
They're just throwing out statistics with no context that are solely meant to create a fear of black people.
We've gone over the murder stats and the manipulations people like Alex can do to make them show whatever he wants to fit his worldview.
So I think it would be redundant to rehash that now.
But just a small example of it.
In 2017, the FBI's data shows that only 61% of murders were even cleared with an arrest.
So whenever you talk about these numbers of the people that they do have in custody...
You kind of have to also ask yourself the question of, is it possible that harsher targeted policing towards African Americans and black people are responsible for them being overrepresented in the arrests when 39% of murders aren't even cleared in a given year?
When you want to have a conversation about these things, those are important pieces to bring into it as opposed to just being like...
Blacks kill so many more people and all this stuff.
Come on.
So, that being said, I have some murder statistics I'd like to share with you that Alex and Mark Dice have no interest in covering.
As of January 6th of this year, there have been six mass shootings in the United States, leaving seven people dead and 23 injured.
In less than a week.
That does not feel good.
Also, according to FBI's data, I think there's a more meaningful number to look at in terms of comparisons among groups, and that's between men and women in terms of committing these acts of violence.
Because there's a large gap between different races and ethnicities in terms of representation just in sheer bulk numbers in the population, whereas it's fairly close.
In 2017, there were 1,932 women who were the victims of homicide.
Of them, 1,733 were killed by men.
That's 90% approximately.
Conversely, of the 4,862 men who were the victims of homicide, only 515 were killed by women, which is about 10%.
This is a statistically very important piece of information that's very relevant.
Again...
This loops back to the six mass shootings already in 2019.
While most of them are still being investigated and information hasn't been made public, at least one of them is definitively a domestic violence situation where a man killed his wife and 12-year-old child then himself, which is unfortunately a tragic pattern that we see play out over and over again.
And that, in turn, loops back to Larry Woodruff, the man arrested for shooting Jasmine Barnes, who had prior arrests for assaulting a family member and pled guilty in 2017 to trying to choke a woman he was dating.
The more pressing conversation to have about murders in this country are there about errant masculinity and access to guns.
The rest of it is irrelevant shadow puppetry people like Mark Dice and Alex Jones use to justify their deep-seated racism.
Well, yeah, it's a certain subset of dudes, but if you look at it just from a statistical point of view, you have to wrestle with the fact that almost all murders of women are done by men, and a very slim number of murders of men are done by women.
My whole point about this is that they're having the wrong conversation intentionally.
It's on a very surface level funny to point out that Mark Dice is complaining about these supposed people only caring about this because they can demonize white people while he's trying to demonize black people.
Then when you get behind it a little bit, you see that every piece of it is hypocritical.
Every single piece of it is just fucking stupid.
They're not reporting the facts.
they're basing wild assertions and misrepresenting statistics.
And that's the game that InfoWars plays because they are a white supremacist outlet.
So, speaking of boring, seemingly fairly not cool with race people, Alex then brings in Mike Adams of NaturalNews.com.
He is a real dick, and it seems to me, if I had to guess, most of Alex Jones' Let's be really interested in Trump declaring a national emergency thing.
I think a lot of it relies on articles that Mike Adams has written.
I think he's done the legwork on a lot of this, and Alex is just thrilled that he doesn't have to do too much work and he can push Mike Adams' ideas to the forefront.
And I'm taking that mostly from this appearance, where Mike Adams says some profoundly dumb shit and is not only...
In favor of a national emergency being called, he outright is calling for an authoritarian coup.
President Trump, he has to use every power of the executive in order to defeat the deep state, or we lose America.
You know, those people who said, well, he shouldn't invoke a national emergency, he shouldn't declare martial law, all these criticisms.
I'm not saying he should declare martial law, but he should use the powers of the national emergency to defend America against those who are attempting to destroy it.
So this is going to be sort of the way that they get around the complaints that we were making at the beginning of the episode as being hypocritical.
They're going to now introduce the idea, we are already in martial law, we are already in this state, therefore Trump needs to declare this national emergency, start kicking people's asses in order to undo all of the stuff that's been done already.
Obama had the most draconian executive order ever, that under the Defense Authorization Act, he funded that executive order with billions to take down Trump and Infowars, and Tucker Carlson and everybody, and it's hiding in plain view the executive order that Trump must declare his new emergency to override it.
I've linked to it in the article that I just posted a few minutes ago.
It's called the National Defense Resources Preparedness Order.
It's on whitehouse.gov.
You can read it.
And importantly, Alex, in that order, in the opening paragraph, Barack Obama invokes...
Himself as the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States of America, indicating that he had planned to use military force to seize control over all resources in the country.
A month later, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs went to the White House and said, we're going to remove you if you don't back off of this and backing Al-Qaeda.
Mike Adams has done his research.
You're getting the absolute truth right now, folks.
That's interesting, and we'll get to that here in a second.
But first things first, Mike Adams doesn't do his research.
He spends most of his time doing things like lying about science on naturalnews.com and setting up hogwatch.com to harass David Hogg and the other survivors of the Parkland shooting.
Mike Adams is a know-nothing piece of shit of the highest order, and I can't say that strongly enough.
This guy is the worst.
Now, as for that executive order, it's number 13603.
We can dispense with the idea that Obama released it in order to declare martial law by...
All we need to do to understand what this executive order is about is to realize that it was just an updating of Bill Clinton's Executive Order 12919 from 1994.
And even that was really just a refinement of the Defense Production Act of 1950, which Harry Truman pushed in order to help assure that the United States had access to necessary materials for defense, like aluminum and steel, as the Korean War was getting started.
But even that was really just an extension of Executive Order 8248, signed in 1939 by FDR.
This is all just stuff that is fine-tuned and refined over the years.
In response to that, in response to the updating of language to include these organizations that were previously not included, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, of course, went to Obama and said, we will overthrow you unless you do this.
Mike's dumb bullshit about Obama evoking that he's the commander-in-chief, it's proof that he's going to bring the military into this, is complete nonsense.
First of all, the order actually begins by saying, quote, By the authority vested in me as the president by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Defense Production Act of 1950, And as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States, it's hereby ordered as follows.
So, Mike clearly read the paragraph to see the Commander-in-Chief part, but how did he miss the Constitution and the laws part?
How did he miss the part where he explains that this is in relation to the Defense Production Act of 1950?
If they understood, oh, well, this is just really an extension of the, oh, let's go read the Defense Production Act of 1950 so we can understand where all this comes from.
So, in reality, this executive order and its predecessors serve an important role in making sure that the various departments within the government are conscious of what may be required in an emergency and are empowered by the act and these executive orders to enter contracts to make sure that the country has access to those materials that are needed.
Beyond that, because of the sum of the language in the bill that's about spending, it's been used consistently since the 1980s to fund research into emerging technologies and independent research that has led to some very important breakthroughs.
Oh, and just because Alex and Mike are complete fucking idiots, it should be pointed out that on June 13, 2017, Trump already evoked the Defense Production Act in order to shift funding towards strengthening the, quote, space industrial base, a year before announcing, Is that because he declared martial law in the 30s and then Trump...
All of the stuff that they're talking about, like Trump has already used this act that is the foundational underpinning of this executive order that really just changes a couple pieces of language because the goddamn Homeland Security Department didn't exist in 1994.
So even Trump knows more about this than these two fucking clowns.
It's nonsense.
So that is the...
Executive order that they're talking about as being evidence of Obama setting all this up and putting us into a state of emergency and martial law that Trump needs to declare his emergency in order to undo.
I don't know what good that would do, but it sounds good to patriots.
Because in that clip that we just played, you can even hear Alex expressing a mentality that you really don't like to hear that seems to imply in order to fight back against a dictatorship, we must create a dictator.
Everybody knows that in order to fight against a dictatorship, one that of course is imaginary, you need to create a real dictatorship because that way you can defeat the imaginary one and we know which dictatorship is better.
The real one.
Remember how great dictatorships are as compared to fake dictatorships?
We were all supposed to be arrested and shut down.
When Trump won the presidency, it threw that entire plan.
It's a total chaos, but also it inadvertently handed these powers to President Trump, who has been reluctant to use these powers that Obama had intended for Hillary Clinton to use.
So understand, the deep state under Obama accidentally gave President Trump the power to destroy the deep state.
This is why they are so terrified.
This is what it's all about.
Trump only needs to invoke these powers that are already on the books.
He can root out the deep state.
He can arrest and indict the traitors who are operating inside government, inside universities that have become terrorist recruitment centers, the traitors, the mayors, the governors who are running these illegal sanctuary cities.
They need to be investigated.
Trump has the power to do this, and he must invoke this power in order to defeat the deep state.
And then restore true liberty and national security to our country.
That's what we are demanding, and I think that's the path that Trump is following now.
People would, especially people who have made a cottage industry out of being like the paranoid guys, be like, what we need is a strong executive evoking emergency powers in order to root out ideas we don't like in universities, traitors in the military.
It's a constitutional role for the military to defend the borders.
And also, by the way, Alex, you know, posse comitatus, it prevents the military from acting as police on the streets of America, but it does not prevent military police from pursuing...
Enemy combatants and domestic enemies of America who are on American soil.
Military police can be dispatched to arrest and seek out treasonous traitors, war criminals, enemy combatants who are on U.S. soil.
There is no restriction against that.
Let's just keep all of this in mind, because America is under attack.
Military police operating on U.S. soil and domestic law enforcement would 100% be against the Posse Comitatus Act.
No two ways about that.
Unless it was a Coast Guard and it was a maritime crime.
There's a small loophole for that.
What Mike is advocating for is literally how dictators shore up power.
We've seen it 100 times.
Simple example that you brought up earlier, after his staged coup in January 2016, Turkish President Erdogan called in the military police to round up his perceived enemies.
Within nine months, 110,000 people had been detained, and approximately 50,000 of them were arrested.
Of that 110,000 people, 7,463 of them were members of the military.
Over 10,000 were police officers.
2,575 were prosecutors or judges who Erdogan disagreed with, some even reportedly members of the Supreme Court.
2,708 were journalists.
179 media outlets were shut down between the staged coup and the end of 2016.
The reason this is important is that these people who were the targets of Erdogan's crackdown are precisely the people Alex and Mike are saying Trump needs to go after.
The entrenched globalists in the military and police forces.
The globalist judges in the Ninth Circuit who won't let you have a flag.
All the mainstream media figures who are enemies of the American people.
In a very real sense, I mean this with no exaggeration, irony, or humor, Alex Jones and his cohorts have now embraced calling for an outright authoritarian coup under the stewardship of their hero, Donald Trump.
This is a very different and much more severe situation than we saw even a few weeks ago.
And the massive escalation of this does not make me feel great about what's to come.
I think that there's a very small section of Alex Jones's Yeah.
It doesn't mean that Trump is going to do that.
I don't want anyone to get that idea in their head, but because...
we're a show that follows Alex Jones and we track this sort of thing we know that this has been something that he's into for a bit but the way they're overtly talking about it is a very marked change
It is very scary to me, the idea that they feel comfortable enough because they believe that tonight Trump is going to declare this national emergency that they can wear it openly, that they can say it is a good idea for the military police to round up potential political enemies and stuff like that.
That is really fucking scary because that means that if shit ever goes that way, they're going to be the first people cheerleading and trying to rationalize.
They're going to be the people who are on the radio in Rwanda.
You know, like, where the mask drops a little bit, and you see...
Oh, this is what you've been meaning for a long time.
I legitimately can't imagine a scenario wherein even if someone had left politics that I agreed with, they were advocating for military police rounding up conservatives or even the alt-right, even Nazis necessarily.
Depends on what those Nazis did.
But you know what I'm saying?
Even if I heard that, there's no way that I would be triumphantly cheering for it.
If it's the state doing it, I can't imagine getting to this place.
And what you realize when you see moments like this is they don't need to get to that place.
There are so many times with so many of the rules and the norms that existed within Congress prior to...
Mitch McConnell's dumb fuckface existing.
God, I want a time machine to...
But so many of these rules are in place because everybody kind of implicitly got that if we change these rules, for us, there will be a pendulum swing back.
And those rule changes that we change to benefit us can then be used to our detriment.
And with these guys, there is something that is now explicit, which is that when you talk about one side or the other, only one side is literally using these rule changes in bad faith to harm people.
So you go too hard one direction, you end up with a broken political system that doesn't fix itself, it doesn't swing back the other way, you end up in tyranny.
The exact same thing that Alex has been warning about and screaming about and making millions of dollars talking about for years.
Right.
unidentified
I think that what we're seeing here is essentially the same thing that is the dichotomy between John Waterman, the Wednesday guy, on Carrie Cassidy's show and on his own blog.
And now, when he has on his own blog, he talks about how it's the Jews and all of them are fucking awful and they're trying to exterminate white people in Germany.
So what he's always done with all of these narratives is prop up and apologize for white terrorism.
All that sort of stuff.
And now he's abandoned the pretense, the mask, of caring about tyranny because the guy who's going to bring in the tyranny that he wants is in favor of all of those things.
And especially the people he surrounds himself don't.
Who cares about litigating his personal beliefs?
It's about the effect.
That would be had.
So he knows that.
It's a small revelation that we've already made repeatedly that is, he is comfortable now because his guy is going to protect the groups he wants protected.
But it's just crazy to see that it is not just about these little things.
It's a trite thing, but I think it's worth it that we spent this little period here having that discussion, because I think it's one way that people who aren't As in touch with and understanding what Alex does, misunderstand him, and they make the wrong attack on him in many ways.
You know, like this idea of like, oh, look at this, you're a hypocrite because now you believe this when you said that.
It's a much more salient attack and a much more salient way to look at things to say...
Oh, what this does is it reveals that you never cared about that, but what you did care about and what was motivating your rhetoric then is the same thing that's motivating it now.
I think it's a more holistic, more reasonable way to look at things.
I don't know.
I don't know if it helps anything, but it's reality.
Right, but in terms of saying the quiet part loud, so many people in the right-wing propaganda, so many people on Fox News would say, not in the same words, but in a far better couched language.
It is directly antithetical to so many of the very ideas of freedom, and it's the sort of thing that has always led down the path towards centralized control, oppression.
We reach real America, and real America supports Trump, supports a declaration of a national emergency, if that's what it takes, whatever it takes to build this wall.
So, there is nothing in there that makes me feel better about Alex saying the time for vengeance isn't now, because in this clip, a mere hour after that, he's saying the globalists have drawn first blood of their fair game.
Yeah.
I think you could interpret it as him being like, let's get him.
There's been a shifting of alliances, and there's been people who have not been on, like, it's not like a consistent one group throughout the entire time.
There's been, like, more or less a history of exclusion and inclusion.
It's kind of been that struggle throughout the entire time.
Because you can kind of boil stuff.
I know that sounds like it's minimizing real serious chattel slavery and stuff like that.
But to an extent, that was driven by exclusion.
There's always been that.
And that heading allows you to include Catholics and the Irish and stuff like that because that was also an attempt to exclude from the group that's allowed to have access to power.
The left has ruined a particular form of fiction that I used to be really fond of.
Did the left ruin it?
Is societal collapse, not just because I think it's relevant today, but also because I think it's just interesting to imagine how different people from different walks of life would react to the existing social structure collapsing suddenly.
First is that he's saying that this is liberal propaganda claptrap, and his two examples are people who identify as LGBT and interracial relationships.
Look, I like the old movies where you weren't going to see any kind of interracial touching or talking unless it's violent and there were only white men and white women.
Kissing, both of them, within their perfect gender roles.
Unless you want to bring up one of the posts from about a year ago that he made that's particularly funny, which is just titled, quote, Bill Cooper warned about Deep State 20 years ago.
Did Alex see that before he had him on as a guest?
Coming up in T-50 minutes, we're going to have the president.
His first Oval Office address.
Now yesterday I said, they said, oh, there's a special address tomorrow, we don't know if it'll be in the Oval Office or not.
It'll be in the Oval Office.
So prediction one came true.
And that means that's time of war, national crisis, you name it.
And Trump has already correctly said, we are in a national crisis.
We are in a national crisis.
Do we declare it a crisis?
So I've said, is it a bargaining chip?
Is that what this is?
Is this a bargaining chip so the Democrats stop holding it up and creating the crisis of the shutdown government to show them I've got the power anyways to build a wall if you don't do it?
Well, if he announces some deal tonight by Pelosi and Schumer, they'll probably double back on it, but that could be the only way he doesn't declare an emergency.
But he needs to declare the emergency because, again, I want to be clear, Obama signed, not as the executive order in 2012, But at least a dozen more.
saying it's a national emergency is he comes out and announces a deal that he made because he threw his dick on the table and said, I'm going to do that and then Pelosi and Schumer cowered in fear.
And you know that they would, if he did announce that, they would probably back out.
Because you know they have a history of backing out of deals, unlike the very person who had a deal in place to continue funding the government, and then because of dickwads like Alex Jones and Sean Hannity, then went back on that fucking deal.
Alex is 100% wrong about this story, and it really illustrates a deep lack of understanding on his part on the topics he's covering.
In August 1981, the Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization found themselves on strike, demanding across-the-board pay raises and more lenience in the hours of their work weeks, given the 24-7 nature of their job.
13,000 controllers walked out of negotiations on August 3rd when it became clear that the FAA wasn't going to give them what they were looking for and the strike continued.
Reagan deemed the strike to be illegal and threatened to fire anyone who didn't go back to work within 48 hours.
11,000 controllers didn't cave, and Reagan stood to his word and fired them, even going so far as to put lifetime bans on them being rehired.
Unfortunately, the scabs, who didn't stand with the union and their fellow workers, were enough to maintain approximately 80% of commercial towers, and the freight industry ran at full levels.
And just like that, a dickhead president dealt a crippling blow to labor rights in the country.
On full display in front of the national media, everyone saw exactly what would happen to organized labor who went against the power of the government.
They would be threatened, and those who didn't fall in line would be fired, fined, and potentially banned for life from their profession.
Reagan's argument was that federal employees don't have the right to strike, so if they did, he should just fire them, based on the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947.
This hadn't been done previously, and most people believed that if circumstances ever came up, a modern president wouldn't be so shitty as to actually summarily fire federal employees for demanding better working conditions.
But those people had never met Reagan.
Many consider the event to be one of the most important in the history of union busting, and a moment that had ripple effects through tons of industries and the lives of just those fired workers alone.
But at no point did Reagan declare a national emergency.
Alex is trying to conflate the idea of a strike and this government shutdown and this national emergency narrative that's going on, which all of them are in no way related.
But in doing so, what he's saying is that no other president has declared a state of emergency except Reagan, which is absolutely not true.
That is the three people voted on the Federal Reserve of emergency declaring arguments.
There are currently 28 national emergencies in effect, dating back to 1979, the oldest one from the Carter administration.
Nearly all of them, 25 out of the 28, have to do with putting freezes on the property of people involved in various regimes we've not liked, or people who are working to disrupt peace processes in countries we did like, like Belarus in 2006, Zimbabwe in 2003, or the Western Balkans in 2001.
The rest are exactly the sort of thing you'd expect to see.
There's one from 1994 about the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
Hey, I'm not against the national emergency about the idea of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
I also think we should be subject to it, but...
You know, there's nuance to the conversation you can have, but you can't make a coherent argument that they're secret, or that somehow by declaring them, any president has gained the ability to declare martial law and crown themselves king.
I'm not saying this to be a dick.
That is literally what Alex Jones and Larry Nichols were arguing in the run-up to the 2016 election, that Obama was going to declare a state of emergency, and the FEMA provisional government would kick in, and then he'd become king.
And just so no one thinks I'm making that up, Here's them saying it.
Why is it when Obama was elected, we were told, oh, thank God, race is finally over, and he's done everything in his power and then some to make race a hotter issue now than the day the man came in?
And if you don't believe, he is working hard to get these riots activated.
And when the riots get activated, Alex, here's the part people don't understand.
When these black mobs start running wild and shooting wildly into the neighborhood, you know what people are doing in this country?
They'll call up and say, please send the government and stop it, protect us.
We will call for the federal government to come in and protect us.
This episode that we're listening to right now is a direct mirror of the night Alex stayed up all night to watch WikiLeaks' anniversary livestream that he thought was going to be the night of Hillary's downfall.
On that evening, Alex thought that his magical deus ex machina was going to arrive and whisk him away to a post-globalist world.
And in that blissful state, he said things that indicated that he and Roger both had advanced knowledge of what was in those leaked emails.
Unlike Medea, his chariot did not arrive that night.
In exactly the same way, you can easily sense Alex is expecting this deus ex machina moment from Trump on January 8th.
He thinks this press conference is going to happen, and after that, Trump is going to be in charge of the U.S. in a state of emergency, and then it's genocide time.
And in the same way that he let too much slip that night when he was watching Assange, him and Roger Stone let too much slip while they're preparing for Trump's speech on January 8th.
In the same way that Mike Adams earlier just really defined authoritarianism and what dictators do to shore up power, Roger Stone just directly described white nationalism.
The idea of these outsiders coming in bring crime and disease.
The same way that Don Trump Jr. with his tweet talking about the zoo walls keep you safe from the animals.
Stuff like that.
It's these dehumanizing ideas.
All they bring is this horrible disease when the statistics don't match that at all.
No reputable science backs that up.
No, nothing.
Nothing.
This is all the editorial position of Infowars, which is of white nationalism.
Him describing the shifting of the electorate, all that sort of thing.
The voting quotient.
All that stuff is all the fear of the loss of white power.
And that is what's important.
They believe that Trump is going to declare the state of emergency that will create the thing that they imagine in their head.
In their argument, of course, will lead to the deaths of their children.
Like, if you continue with this authoritarian white nationalist fascist state, it's only going to accelerate our impending deaths by climate change.
Like, everything they're doing is like, it's going to be awesome to live in an authoritarian dictatorship because I'll be dead in 20 years and only my children will have to deal with the real fallout of that.
And because of the poor redaction, people were able to find out what was under those black bars, and it turns out that he had given internal polling data to Russian spies.
So, like, there's that stuff, and it's like, hey, Roger, for years you guys ran a business together, and he took over for you when you left the campaign.
It's not good.
It doesn't look great.
So, Roger really wants to muddy the waters about the idea of this Trump Tower meeting that that lawyer, Vessel Nitskaya, had with Manafort, Don Jr., That other Russian spy.
Fusion GPS is actually a central intelligence agency front interfacing with the Russians to trick Russians into engaging in espionage to get Defense Department funding.
And I'm not a foreign military, I'm a foreign government, but not the traitors within them.
They have officially tried to set me up.
Really?
These groups are reported to the FBI, and they know that, and they're crapping bricks right now.
So the fact they're doing this, they use this fake, just like they're trying to overthrow Russia and they spend billions a year with Soros, they're using Russian networks they've got in the U.S. that really work for the left to try to set patriots up to just talk to them or take money from them to then claim this whole fake Russia thing is real, when the truth is it's the Clintons and others that sold us out to Russia.
So the fact that this poor...
Russian woman, who quite frankly is an idiotic tart, she was running around trying to get the NRA to hire her, the Republicans to hire her.
She sent emails to the Russians saying, hey, I'm having sex with all these Republicans.
Will you hire me?
And the Russians obviously didn't talk to her, thinking she was an agent.
So this is all they've got?
I mean, it's quite shameful, the Russian intelligence network, quite frankly, if all they've got is a woman that didn't even work.
Although, it would be interesting if he tried to repurpose that RT interview where he got talked to by Russian intelligence as an attempt to set him up or something like that.
Like not to be like that part of that, that Russophobic kind of Russian, but this is something that the Russian intelligence agencies often do, which is say, we don't even have the capabilities of doing that.
People are trying to say that we're doing that.
We couldn't even, we couldn't do that if we wanted to.
But that's slick rationalization, saying Trump was warned that they'd crash the economy if he did it.
That sort of thing.
Get the fuck out of here with that shit.
It's just so lame.
He spent the entire day saying, I know this is going to happen.
It's going to happen.
We're going to be covering it when it happens.
Like, letting their lust for...
Authoritarianism show in preparation for it happening, and then they said, you know, I had a sense it was going to happen, but, you know, things happen, and Trump got threatened.
Look, look, he didn't declare a national emergency, and of course we never said we wanted him to.
Like, we're not saying that we want an authoritarian government, especially now that he has not instituted one, and that kind of suggests that we're still not going to be okay if we keep out and out asking for an authoritarian coup.
We can only ask for an authoritarian coup after it's already happened.
My oldest daughter, I've got three daughters and a son.
I've got four children.
Daughters, you know, 14 down to 20 months.
My daughter, like, says, will you come pick me up at this house?
I go to some house party with the parents at a birthday party.
there'll be like 20 girls there and their parents and they're all listeners and they all want pictures with me and then she had three girls over saturday and they were i was like yeah i've been i got home late i'm gonna watch a tv show my wife go to bed they're like no dad come take photos and shoot videos for their parents they're such fan i'm not right oh i'm famous the point is yes people are away yeah but
Yeah, yeah, where it's like they say something and you're like, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, for sure.
That's just like this completely unrelated thing that's going to exactly change the topic one million percent from whatever the fuck it was you were talking about.
Oh, I think his job was to be a minder for Donald Trump for the deep state, as was Rex Tillerson, as was H.R. McMaster, one of the greatest disasters of all time.
You told me he was definitely going to declare a national emergency.
Now, I'm going to give you credit for being right about Bannon back then in order to present my righteous anger at you to tell me where to go because I can't figure this out on my own.
And he also was talking earlier in the day, I didn't have any clips of this from his episode, but there's an article in Zero Hedge about how Trump wasn't going to declare a national emergency.
Now, I was going to come back in this segment, and I was going to get to this later, but everybody knows my habit of mentioning something coming up and getting right into it.
But when we come back, constitutional lawyer, really smart cookie, founder of OathCook.
Oh, no!
He's going to be joining us, Stuart Rhodes.
But here's the bottom line.
And he's a constitutional lawyer, won awards at Yale for his writings, and of course worked for Ron Paul.
Smart guy.
He concurs with what I've said.
Trump essentially is no longer the president.
He has advocated his responsibility.
He's signing it away.
He's letting a group of people around him tell him that he can't fire the head of the Federal Reserve, which he can do in the code.
And then the only way he can really deal with it when it doesn't happen is to join a militia, blame, blame the globalists for threatening to collapse the economy.
That's the only move he can make, and that's the only narrative I can see moving forward, and he probably would love to do that with his old riding partners, the fucking Oath Keepers.
Direct, vengeance-filled war between the globalists and his nationalist armies.
It was going to be set off by Trump coming on air in the Oval Office, as Alex Jones pointed out, the place for war and the place for national emergency and security.
He was going to come on.
He was going to announce that.
The globalists are going to have a backlash, but the patriots were right, and so they were going to end up vanquishing them, killing them.
Trump's military police were going to clear out all the bad people, and the judiciary and the media was going to be reclaimed and all that stuff.
We are not fucking stupid, so we see through that, and we see what he's talking about is an authoritarian power grab, and Alex is super excited about that.
And what that means to me, what I can suss from that, those differences of response to these events, is that in the prior event with the bombing of Syria, what got him off that ledge and got him back in pocket was the exact advice that he no longer trusts.
I don't know what this pretends, but I would love it to be a pivot because I think there's much more interesting fertile territory for Alex outside of Trump now.
To create a state of emergency wherein unlimited executive power can be expressed in order to get rid of the people he politically disagrees with in various media, judiciary, mayors, governors, that sort of shit.
So, I mean, it doesn't matter what he pivots to.
That's in his heart.
In the same way that when we went back and heard that clip from the 90s when he's talking about the leaderless resistance, which was clearly a reference to Louis Beam.
This is in his heart.
White nationalist, white supremacist ideology has always been a part of his rhetoric, no matter how much he's masked it.
And now we also know that a strong desire for that to be brought in through authoritarianism...
Fascism, strong-arm tactics, that has also probably always been in his heart.
I see so much of, because of all the stuff we've gone over.
So much of that couching of his real authoritarian white nationalist bent is similar to so many people who are less engaged.
Their talking points come from all of these different places.
And these people who are less engaged probably don't have an intellectual understanding of the underpinnings of their talking points, which are, of course, white nationalists, giving them the benefit of the doubt.
What they're doing is they're picking teams.
You know, this is my team, that's your team.
I'm going to go with my team no matter what.
And it is really important, in response to his rhetoric, and this is going to come from left field for me, you should talk to the people who are not engaged, who say things like this bullshit.
It's got to be something that we have to actually communicate, is that if you are a disengaged Republican, you are inexplicably, or no, you're very explicably now a white nationalist, and you've got to figure out how you got there.
It is still conducive to conversation to try and explain to people that what they are doing is tacitly supporting violence.
They're tacitly supporting violence against minorities, people with different gender expressions, people with medical conditions that people look down on.
Who are gay and lesbians, bisexuals, all of it.
It's tacit violence against them, and it's not okay.