Today, Dan and Jordan begin an adventure of breaking down Alex Jones' 2009 "documentary" The Obama Deception. In this installment, we get the lay of the land, meet some of the main players in the documentary, and find so many problems that this episode only covers the first 12 minutes of the film.
Thanking our donors and the people who make this show possible, we have been tasked with breaking down the entirety of Alex Jones' 2009 documentary, in heavy quotes documentary, The Obama Deception.
I don't think there was anything groundbreaking that happened right before we did Endgame, but I feel like we're entering a new era of covering Alex Jones with us finding that clip from the 90s where he's talking about the leaderless resistance.
Because even though, and I've heard this from listeners and I agree, even though we're making fun of Alex and talking about what he's lying about and stuff like that, there's still a corrosive toxic effect of listening to tons of Alex Jones.
Alex is playing that clip as some sort of means of being like, he's full of himself.
It's some sort of like, I am Superman.
I've come here to save the world.
But he fails to recognize or point out in any way that this is a clip that was taken from Obama's appearance at the Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation dinner.
That dinner is a traditional stop on the campaign trail where candidates from both parties give speeches and are encouraged to poke fun at each other and themselves.
Since the dinner's founding in 1954, every candidate who would go on to win the election, with the exception of Harry Truman and Bill Clinton, have appeared and given humorous speeches.
It's a big-ticket fundraiser, and it's a high-end Catholic charity.
And other than their clear discomfort with supporters of abortion, talking about Bill Clinton there, the foundation tries to keep the event non-political and convivial.
Some of the other jokes Obama made that night, quote, I feel right at home here because it's been said that I share the politics of Alfred E. Smith and the ears of Alfred E. Newman.
Good joke.
Kills.
Another one, quote, Al Smith, I never knew your great-grandfather, but from everything Senator McCain has told me, the two of them had a great time together before Prohibition.
Anyway, Obama's speech at the Alfred Smith dinner was a masterpiece, from my perspective, and he took accusations that were thrown at him and commented on them with humor and grace.
By the time of the dinner, on October 16, 2008, the birther's conspiracies were already running wild.
Jerome Corsi was already appearing all over Fox News to claim that the short-form birth certificate that had been released was a fake.
Alex opening his clip with this clip of Barack Obama clearly telling a joke about malicious accusations people who were associated with.
What's of Alex we're making should give you a sense of where this documentary is on a spiritual level.
So that's from a speech Obama gave on July 2, 2008 in Colorado Springs.
And Alex deprives that quote of any context.
Around that clip...
That he just played.
Obama said, quote, We know from listening to Alex's show in 2009 that he's trying to imply that Obama wants to create a civilian army that would patrol America as his jackbooted thugs.
And he's trying to use this very selectively edited clip to demonstrate that.
From knowing the sentence that came right before the one Alex used, however, You can clearly see that what he's talking about is not using military might as the sole avenue towards reaching our goals, but reestablishing a focus on diplomacy, which I would think Alex would be super into, given his anti-foreign wars position.
But oh well.
Let me just stress that through the entire speech, Obama keeps saying that service to others and the community are really important, that he intends to ask people to embrace service, not that he intends to force anyone to.
We are 41 seconds in and you have paused it three times.
No, my prediction is...
That regardless of how evil he is trying to paint Obama, and regardless of my feelings on Obama's presidency, which are at best mixed, at best mixed, I am going to miss Obama so hard.
The clip of Rahm Emanuel that he just played there is taken from an appearance Rahm made in 2006 on C-SPAN 2's Afterwords program to promote a book he co-wrote called The Plan, Big Ideas for America.
Honestly, a lot of the interview is about how he wants to help families pay for their kids' college because the investment in human capital pays off for the larger society at a higher rate than any other kind of investment.
We're in a long struggle against terrorism, and America is a target.
And therefore, one of the best ways to prepare America is to bring citizens forward in understanding what their role is going to be.
Everything from if the levies break to if there's a chemical attack in this country or some other type of attack, what role they have in training the citizens.
Everybody between the ages of 18 to 25 will serve three months of basic training in understanding a kind of civil defense.
The important thing to remember here is this is just an idea that Rahm and his co-author had, not something that ever got put into legislation.
He wrote this book, and that appearance was in 2006.
Hey, dude, Alex just opened his film with multiple lies and distortions about the idea of Obama creating his own personal army, and then the next clip he plays is of black youths chanting in support of Obama.
There's no question what image he wanted to put in the audience's head with that.
After the procession, the children recite facts about Obama's health care plan.
Immediately after this video got posted, people got real pissed.
And kind of understandably, I guess, it does appear to be indoctrination of children.
But the boys were students at the Urban Community Leadership Academy in Kansas City, Missouri.
Joyce McGowtha, the superintendent of the school, noted that they were not going to release the name of the teacher of the students because they were likely going to pursue legal action.
At issue was the fact that the teacher was having the students study Obama's health care plan, but not also McCain's.
Not that they ended up doing the chanting.
That would be totally fine.
Probably more important as an aspect of the story is that the Urban Community Leadership Academy was a charter school which was described as a failed experiment by the 2014 report by the Network of Public Education due to endemic patterns of fraud and scamming systematic within charter schools.
used to make a profit off educating children.
The Urban Community Leadership Academy is likely one such school, or I should say it was.
It closed in 2012.
An audit by the Missouri State Auditor found after the school had been notified by their sponsor, the University of Central Missouri, that they were intending to allow their sponsorship to lapse, that $117,980 in school funds was unaccounted for.
Even under subpoena, the school's business manager could not find receipts to justify the claim purchases.
You kind of have to assume that this wasn't the only incident of conveniently sloppy record-keeping they ever got up to.
That's the bigger issue that I see here than this YouTube video.
Also, they're just assuming that the teacher didn't teach them both plans and the kids are like, I like Obama's more.
I don't know if that's the case.
I'm not saying it is.
I have no idea.
But, you know, the thing that I really feel bad about here is that...
There's an element of abuse within this, and that's based on the fact that these kids were put into this situation.
They're the faces that appear in this documentary, specifically to spread fear of militant black youths, not the teacher who is presumably the adult in the situation.
So I just feel like it's wrong of Alex to do this, because those kids don't deserve to be put into this documentary as a source of fear.
Real quick, that is California Representative Brad Sherman speaking on the floor in 2008 about the initial bailout bill, which is before Obama was elected.
Alex is playing fast and loose with that quote about being threatened with martial law.
It's not so much that anyone in Congress was threatened with martial law, it's more a situation where the consequences of not acting were so severe that some people felt that things could get bad enough that our entire economy would go belly up.
That's what Representative Sherman is saying, and I know this.
More or less, but he never mentions that on October 14th, 2008, the very guy who was on his show, it was more people saying that there could be bad consequences to this, but no one had their arm twisted and threatened by Goldman Sachs representatives.
So the punchline of this is that once Brad Sherman gets off the phone with Alex on that appearance, Alex starts to mischaracterize the conversation immediately, saying, quote, There you have it, ladies and gentlemen.
Yeah, there were people on the floor saying they were told there would be martial law and literal blood in the streets if this didn't happen.
They were told this, but I can't tell you who told me.
He's trying to already spin this into the narrative that he wants.
Fun fact, Brad Sherman is a gun-grabbing, LGBT-supporting, abortion-defending dude with 100% rating from the National Organization of Women, 100% rating from the ACLU, and in July 12, 2017, he introduced articles of impeachment against Donald Trump.
Now, where we're about to go with this next clip is one of the, like, on this, in preparation of this documentary, I, like, sincerely went down some weird rabbit holes that may have nothing to do with this documentary.
If anyone wants some real good fun, Google Louie Gohmert terror babies and watch the clip of Gohmert freaking out for like seven minutes because Anderson Cooper doesn't believe a conspiracy that Louie Gohmert is pushing that terrorists are having anchor babies here so they can stay and do terrorism years down the line.
Anderson Cooper has such a hard time not laughing.
It is one of the funniest things I've ever watched.
In 2013, the advocate awarded Louie Gohmert a phobia award for being one of the biggest homophobes of the year.
This was the result of him defending his position that you shouldn't be able to regulate guns because gay marriage is the same thing as bestiality, I think?
Okay.
And the problem is once you draw a limit in terms of capacity magazine size, it's kind of like marriage.
When you say it's not a man and a woman anymore, then why not have three men and a woman?
All he was doing was trying to bridge a gap to bestiality somehow.
So he could...
Make a stupid point.
Also, in 2013, Gohmert argued that terrorists were sneaking into the country by pretending to be Mexican immigrants because, quote, we don't have any fear of Hispanics coming into the country.
So in 2013, that same year, Gomer was part of a very weird visit to Egypt to meet with the soon-to-be-installed President General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, who had just led a successful coup d 'etat and had Morsi, the erstwhile president, arrested.
Protests ensued for Morsi supporters, and not surprisingly, in the wake of the coup headed up by a general, some killings of civilians started.
On August 14, 2013, LCC's forces raided two camps of protesters in Cairo after they'd been engaging in a six-week-long sit-in.
Human Rights Watch described what ensued as, quote, one of the world's largest killings of demonstrators in a single day in recent history, and put the death toll at at least 817, but likely more than 1,000 people.
Less than a month later, Louie Gohmert visited to give LCC congratulations on performing the coup.
Good work.
For reasons I can't explain other than just to shrug and say tea party, he was joined on the trip by noted weirdo Michelle Bachmann and outright Nazi representative Steve King.
Because many of the pro-Morsi protesters who were massacred were members of the Muslim Brotherhood, Bachman took it upon herself to blame the Muslim Brotherhood for doing 9-11.
This is hard to grasp, for one, because it's not true, and two, because the Muslim Brotherhood publicly and strongly condemned the attacks of 9-11.
Anyway, the reason I bring all this up is that on that trip, Louie Gohmert said this.
Quote, Henry Paulson is no George Washington, but apparently, Louie Gohmert.
He is still a president today in Egypt, and Human Rights Watch has described his government as having, quote, worked to eradicate independent civil society in the country.
Congratulations, Louis Gohmert.
unidentified
If anyone questions, Mr. Kashkari, that you're working hard.
Our question.
Obama pledged that he would resume the Security and Prosperity Partnership talks between Mexico and Canada that President Bush...
Tom Daschle was nominated for Secretary of Health and Human Services.
But by the time this documentary came out, he had already withdrawn his name from consideration because of tax problems.
So I think that Alex blew his budget on this shoddy, awful animation and just refused to change it by the time it came out because, eh, fuck it, throw Tom Daschle in there, who cares?
But, like, if he's displaying this level of, like, first of all, lack of awareness of how our government works while making substantive complaints about said government.
I've always admired KRS-One, and I still think a lot of his music is great.
But when you hear someone make this kind of bad analogy to explain their political philosophy, you really need to take a step back and assess whether they are someone or someone who you shouldn't listen to.
Not in terms of their music, but in terms of their opinions.
This is ludicrous.
And it's not ludicrous.
Ludicrous is great in the Fast and Furious movies.
Also, it's important to point out that five months after this interview with Alex that he's doing right now, KRS-One released a 600-page book called, quote, The Gospel of Hip-Hop, The First Instrument.
In promoting the book, he said, quote, I'm suggesting that in 100 years this book will be the new religion on Earth.
I respect Christianity, the Islam, the Judaism, but their time is up.
He certainly has every right to start his own music-based religion, so I'm not gonna knock that.
I just think it's really funny that Alex Jones, the guy who can't stop yelling about how Christians are under attack, is perfectly fine promoting this guy who's actively trying to start a religion because, quote, "Christianity's time is up." It should be.
So, now, the other thing I want to point out is that, like, saying that Republicans and Democrats act like opposing forces, but behind the scenes they get along.
That's how I want the fucking government to work.
This isn't show business.
It's just humans disagreeing civilly.
This is the way that I would like things to work.
The idea that one side believes position X, the other side believes position Y, but they're both good people and can share a stake and talk about their families or golf scores or whatever the fuck, that's how the world should operate.
It's pretty obvious that there's some gigantic financial institutions that have been pulling the strings of politicians in this country for a long time.
This is also the only appearance that Rogan makes in this documentary, because I suspect that in 2009, Alex didn't know that he would soon be one of the most popular people in the world.
Otherwise, he would have begged him to be all over this documentary.
And also, what Joe's expressing there is right on.
Excessive money flooding into politics is a recipe for disaster.
But, Jordan, the logical conclusion of that is not to adopt any of Alex's stupid positions.
It's to initiate and institute public funding for campaigns and make accepting any donations illegal.
Strangely, that's not the topic of this documentary.
So when he makes the claim that Bush tripled the size of the government, in order for me to talk about that, I first have to know what he means by that.
The thing that is particularly jarring now that we live in the future, and it's still fucking going on, is the equivalence he has putting one million dead Iraqis...
5,000 dead American soldiers.
And he does not, like, he just leaves that there, puts them right next to each other like they're the same problem.
So I think he's playing a little bit fast and loose with these poll numbers.
So if you consult the Gallup Poll's historical approval ratings for Congress, you see this can't be where Alex is getting his information from.
There's their approval rating during July 10th to 13th, 2008.
The number hit 14%, which is the lowest during this span at all.
But it rebounded up from there.
And after the inauguration on January 2009, the numbers were back up in the 30s, which still isn't great.
But it's not nearly what Alex is saying.
According to Gallup's numbers, the congressional approval rating would never get down to 9% until November 2013.
It's not hard to remember why their approval rating was so bad back then.
You may recall that this crisis was the result of there being a Democratic-majority Senate and a Republican House.
The Affordable Care Act had passed, and this was a real problem for the folks on the right, many of whom were fully beholden to Koch Brothers' money through Tea Party organizations like Tea Party Patriots and Heritage Action.
It was an existential issue for them to see the ACA gone, so insurance companies would actually have to cover people and not treat health like unregulated gambling.
In September 2013, there was an appropriations bill that needed to be passed to ensure that the government was funded.
Republicans, very notably Ted Cruz, used this as a bargaining chip to try and force the dismantling of the Affordable Care Act.
They offered to pass the funding bill, but only if they could defund the Affordable Care Act.
This strategy was literally coming from the Koch brothers' founded Think Tank Freedom Works, which suggested that since the funding bill, quote, must be renewed in order for the doors to stay open in Washington, The continuing resolution is the best chance we will get to withdraw funds from Obamacare.
This can be done by attaching bills by Senator Ted Cruz or Congressman Tom Graves to the continuing resolution, which will totally defund Obamacare.
Senator Mike Lee and Congressman Mark Meadows are leading the charge to get their colleagues to commit to this approach by putting their signatures to a letter affirming that they will refuse to vote for the concurrent resolution that contains Obamacare funding.
And guess what happened?
The exact Republicans named in that release from FreedomWorks led the charge not to approve the spending bill unless it dismantled the Affordable Care Act.
The Democratic Senate didn't agree to those terms, and Obama had already said that he would veto any bill that passed with this strategy, so bada-bing, we ended up with a 16-day shutdown of the federal government.
800,000 employees were furloughed, and 1.3 million had to go to work not knowing when they'd be paid.
The damage that was caused by this...
This petulant shutdown that had nothing to do with actually achieving the goal of defunding the Affordable Care Act is pretty hard to put into words.
Countless non-governmental organizations that relied on federal funding were completely cut off, including domestic violence shelters and homeless outreach programs.
As many as 19,000 children lost their access to the Head Start program, which provides education, food, and health care to underprivileged children.
The National Parks estimated that they lost approximately $76 million a day in tourism income during the shutdown, $2.7 million a day alone from the Grand Canyon, which has a reciprocal effect on the small businesses that exist around the National Parks that rely on them to bring in business in the form of tourists.
That's when Congress had a 9% approval rating.
But, of course, Alex was in favor of the government shutdown and supports Ted Cruz.
I'm not sure what that means other than Alex Jones is a real shithead.
Polls showed an actual approval rating of 9% for Congress.
But it should be pointed out that Rasmussen put out a poll in July 2008 saying that 9% of the 1,000 likely voters they polled thought that Congress was doing a good or excellent job.
That's all good and well, but that's not a 9% approval rating.
For contrast, Gallup's poll was just a poll of citizens 18 or older, not necessarily likely voters, and they specifically asked the question, quote, do you approve or disapprove of the way Congress is handling its job?
So it's irresponsible to say they had a 9% approval rating when that wasn't what the poll looked at.
Also, a minor point, but both parties, Alex is saying that they were universally hated.
That absolutely wasn't the case.
The Democrats were winning on generic ballots by 12 points nationally, which makes sense because in the 2008 elections, Democrats gained eight seats in the Senate and 21 in the House, hence the need for the mainstream GOP to embrace the emerging Tea Party in a desperate attempt to Just for context, the last time one party had 57 senators, as the Democrats did after the 2008 election, was in 1992.
And that was the Democrats too.
The last time the Republicans had a majority that large was in the election of 1920, when Warren G. Harding was elected president and 11 states fielded Socialist Party candidates for the Senate that won over 1.7% of their states' votes.
So I'm just giving you that as like, that's the world we lived in the last time Republicans had the majority that Democrats enjoyed in 2008.
And this is a myth that's perpetuated by the right wing of this idea that he came out of nowhere.
It's used in service of the idea that he was a creation of the Illuminati.
A lot of people use it when they try and make arguments that he wasn't born in America.
Or maybe even a demon.
All these sorts of things.
The problem is it's complete bullshit.
Prior to running for president, Obama ran for and served as a senator in Illinois.
That alone pretty much gets rid of the he came out of nowhere kind of gambit.
But it's legit way worse than that.
Before being senator, Obama was a member of the Illinois Senate, winning his first election in 1996.
Being part of the state senate, that puts Obama right on the same level as all these weirdo state senators that Alex constantly has on his program to talk about reasserting their 10th Amendment rights and all that shit.
He was in...
State Senate since 1997.
That's almost as long as Alex has been on the radio.
What Alex is really saying here, and what all these people are really saying, is that when they say he appeared out of nowhere, is he wasn't on my radar.
That's all they're really saying.
And it's fairly easy to see why.
In his time in Congress, one term basically, Obama was the primary sponsor for four bills that were enacted.
In comparison, outright Nazi Steve King of...
Iowa has been in the House since 2003, and at press time, he's only got one bill passed, and it was to name a post office.
Obama was an active member of the state senate in Illinois.
So yeah, I mean, he was a member of the state senate, then in the US senate, and in 2004 he gave a super important speech at the Democratic National Convention, which boosted his stature even further.
Right, so the idea that he came out of nowhere, even if he wasn't in the state house, state senate and all that, before, in 2004 he gave that sort of groundbreaking speech at the Democratic Convention.
If humanity has any hope of effecting real change for the better, it will not come from the Madison Avenue false reality makers who have cast Barack Obama as the savior of the world.
To alter our course from tyranny to liberty, to defeat the corrupt elite, we must get past the puppets and confront the real power structure of the mind.
This is clearly just, okay, all of your information comes from people who have twisted the work of Carol Quigley, who put out the book, The Anglo-American Establishment.
That has been misrepresented by the likes of W. Cleon Skousen in The Naked Capitalist and Gary Allen in None Dare Call It Conspiracy.
When you use terms like that, it's like, ah, that's what you're talking about.
I'll still evaluate your claims based on their merit, but I know that that's where you come from now.
Now, I want to tell you about Webster Griffin Tarpley.
Does Tony Anderson show up halfway in, and they have a little sit-down where the leg...
Okay, now, we're going to break it, we're going to get back into the Obama deception, but guys, the only way to get past this North American Union shit...
So Webster Tarpley is a protege of Lyndon LaRouche, who comes up on our normal show every now and again, most interestingly as being Jim Baker's cellmate when the two were in prison.
LaRouche is only tangentially related to the matters at hand, so we're going to have to save getting deep into him for another day.
But suffice it to say, in 1979, he filed a libel lawsuit against the Anti-Defamation League for calling him anti-Semitic.
The suit was thrown out, and Justice Michael Donson of the New York Supreme Court ruled that it was a fair comment, and the facts, quote, reasonably give rise to the description of him as anti-Semitic.
I don't have any interest in reading these books, but reviews that I've read have described his work as, quote, a melange of fact and distortion written in a highly suppositional style that makes numerous leaps of logic and asserts connections where there is no evidence to support it, and at other times omits exculpatory or contrary information that reveals a more complex picture.
Sounds like exactly the sort of guy Alex would love to be an expert.
All I can go on is that I have an ingrained distrust of organized religion, especially as an educational tool, and the fact that the American Association of College Professors has censured the Catholic University of America for academic freedom violations.
All that being said, the school is 62.8% white and...
It was created, the Fulbright program was created with the goal of sending students abroad and bringing foreign students here with the hope of improving intercultural relations and bringing said nations together.
You see, the Fulbright program was named after the guy who came up with it, Senator J. William Fulbright.
unidentified
The thing about J. William Fulbright is he is a bit of a globalist.
Insofar as international law is observed, it provides us with stability and order, and with a means of predicting the behavior of those with whom we have reciprocal legal obligations.
He wholeheartedly supported the creation of the UN, and after he retired from the Senate, he practiced international law.
So what we have here is Webster Tarpley accepting government money in a globalist program created by an arch-globalist so he could go study in Italy.
And thus, it should make no one all that surprised to find out that, in the lead-up to the 2016 election, Webster Tarpley came out strongly in favor of Hillary Clinton.
He accurately figured out that the collapse of any kind of a principled libertarianism in America was leaving an opening that Trump could exploit to bring in fascism.
He wrote, on March 25, 2016...
If we look for the roots of the Trump phenomenon, and in particular the savage immorality of a candidate whose supporters applaud when he calls for expanding the use and severity of torture, mass deportations, and mass killings of the families of his targets, we should not forget about the tremendous degradation included by a figure like Ron Paul.
Paul wanted to abolish all U.S. emergency food aid, meaning that about 60% of the emergency nourishment usually available worldwide in a given year would have disappeared, leading once again to genocide.
He literally argues that libertarianism is the front door, the natural introduction to fascism, and that Ron Paul is complicit in it.
In this blog post, he's clearly also talking about Alex Jones.
Quote, Between 2008 and early 2015, the libertarian bloggers and broadcasters were in a state of accelerating decline, especially in terms of the moral honesty and ideological quality of their output.
We're watching the astounding ease with which veteran doctrinaire libertarians blithely throw their doctrine and principles overboard and rush like lemmings to join the bandwagon of the fascist Trump, whose dictatorial and authoritarian tendencies could hardly be more blatant.
Good thing Alex made him the centerpiece of this documentary.
I have no idea what to think about Webster Charpley, like, as a whole.
He's going to be factually and spiritually wrong about almost everything in this documentary, but at the same time, he at least had the good sense to see Trump for what he was and had the wherewithal to speak out about it, which is kind of crazy, considering the other people in this world.
I think the most likely conclusion here is what I'm going to stick by, because it's the easiest, simplest explanation that explains all of the things.
Is that Webster Tarpley is a charlatan and a con man, that even a con man generally knows it's better, they know better than to support the rise of something overtly fascist.
In August 2016, Webster Tarpley reported that Melania Trump was a high-end prostitute before meeting Donald Trump, which quickly led to a libel suit from Melania.
In February 2017, Webster Tarpley settled that lawsuit, the terms of which were private, but included him making a public apology and paying a substantial sum.
It's funny that we're nine minutes into this documentary, and already we have two people.
One, an incidental figure, and the other, literally the main person in the documentary, who have since gone entirely against Alex Jones and what he's up to.
And one of them has tried to get Trump impeached, and the other got sued for libel for calling Melania a high-end prostitute, and wrote blogs before the election calling...
Or at least the West to be what everybody else does.
The reason that's stupid is what he's talking about is the idea that they call it the New World Order instead of the Anglo-American establishment world order or whatever so they can convince people in India to go along with it.
People that are knowledgeable know that the fight that this country has been waging since its inception is for the central bankers not to take over the country.
So we've run into Salenti a number of times on our coverage of Alex Jones' show, but we've never really done a dive into his history, like who he is, or that of his business, the Trends Research Institute.
And now, since he's the other main protagonist of this documentary, along with Webster Carbly...
So the thing that's funny about him being one of Alex's main dudes comes right from his own bio.
Quote, while Salenti holds a U.S. passport, he considers himself a citizen of the world.
Sounds mighty globalist to me.
So, we know Gerald Salenti is a guy who will appear and lend Alex's show a little dramatic flair with his expert delivery and cranky old man energy.
We also know that he existed on the show almost exclusively to help Ted Anderson sell gold, as he would constantly warn the audience that the dollar was about to completely be devalued and anyone expecting to survive needed to buy gold.
He constantly warned every year that the upcoming summer would be the summer of rage.
He'd do that every year.
We've seen it over and over again on Alex's show.
In his trend journal in June 2015, he speculated that it was possible that gold would soon be trading at $20,000 an ounce and would definitely, definitely...
Definitely be above 2,000 in the very near future.
At the time of his writing, gold was trading around 1,200 an ounce and would never reach higher than 1,300 an ounce, all the way up to present day where it's trading, again, right around 1,200 an ounce.
But Salenti hasn't just been wrong consistently about gold prices and the dollar.
And beyond that, he constantly puts out, quote, revised trend forecasts in the middle of the year in order to fudge what he said in January if he needs to.
And then beyond that, I'm not going to pay him, like, I think it's $100 a year to get access to his journal.
I'm not going to pay that for a quarterly fucking journal of wrong things.
But even though it was really difficult, I was able to find a couple really fun predictions that Gerald Salenti has made over the years that were fucking so far off.
In 1999, he told the San Francisco Chronicle, quote, unless you're going to have some kind of mystical ancient Chinese power from drinking it, bubble tea is not going anywhere.
As the year 2000 rang in, he told Psychology Today, quote, Voluntary simplicity, once merely a counterculture ideal, will finally become a reality in the 21st century.
Moderation, self-discipline, and spiritual growth will be the personal goals of the future, not material accumulation.
LAUGHTER LAUGHTER LAUGHTER LAUGHTER LAUGHTER LAUGHTER LAUGHTER LAUGHTER LAUGHTER LAUGHTER LAUGHTER I wrote this out and I wasn't even ready to say that.
I want to hear him say these things because they sound so cranky and I know his voice is so awesome that I just want to hear him talk about, ah, fucking rock and roll, replacing swimming.
So pretty much all of Salenti's trend predictions are little more than vague pronouncements, which are often wrong and ultimately based on little more than his guesses.
In the book, Invest in Yourself, the authors asked Salenti how he makes his predictions, to which he replied that basically what he does is every day he reads two newspapers and then finds connections between stories that may or may not actually exist.
He holds a newspaper up on his wall, throws a dart, reads the article, reads the other article in the newspaper, and he's like, music's going to be different.
He's not good with trends and predictions, but what he is good at doing is being dramatic and adding that sort of flair and sheepdogging people into buying gold.
Because he creates panics all the time.
He tries to create and instill fear, which is why he's perfect as someone to have around for someone who works for a guy who sells gold.
Among the anti-tax, anti-government crowd, they all believe that Andrew Jackson is a hero who is working hard to wrestle control over America away from the evil Central Bank.
I was about to quote Matt Riggs' bit about how we need to start a movement to reduce that fraction.
So in 1932, that's what he did.
He ended the charter for the Second Bank of the United States.
That's technically ending a central bank, but it's not like he conquered the bank.
The Second Bank was established after the War of 1812 left the United States in a precarious financial situation.
Inflation was through the roof as the myriad private banks printed up tons of money that made all of the money increasingly worthless.
You just had all of these banks producing their own currency that was different than each other, and you ended up in a situation where...
They needed to create this centralized bank It's almost like everything that Alex has ever advocated for has a historical precedent that went terribly wrong.
Sure.
So in 1812, President Madison founded the Second Bank of the United States, specifically with a charter for it to last 20 years.
When Jackson was elected, it was the end of the bank's charter, and all he did was not renew the charter, despite overwhelming public support and support of the Congress for the bank.
After he did this, Jackson pushed for the removal of government funds from the second bank, which he succeeded in carrying out.
These funds were specifically placed in his favored, quote, pet banks, state banks that were known to be loyal to the Jackson administration.
In 1836, the Federal Bank ceased to exist and became the State Bank of Pennsylvania.
Historian James Scholar noted, And
in his deregulatory, laissez-faire attitude towards everything, all of these competing currencies came up and created a mass chaos.
And, you know, these people who said that he should be working on controlling the economy weren't doing that just for their health.
Historian H.W. Brands explains the situation that rose in terms...
Of monetary issues.
Quote, It got worse, primarily as a result of Jackson's war against the Bank of the United States.
Freed from the restraints of Biddle's Bank, that's the guy who ran the second bank of the United States, free from the restraints Biddle's Bank had imposed, the state banks issued notes by the basketful.
These fueled the rampant speculation in every kind of commodity.
Jackson couldn't do much about the speculation overall except worry that it jeopardized the stability of the economy and threatened the welfare of millions of ordinary people.
On July 11, 1836, Andrew Jackson put out a decree to halt rampant land speculation, declaring that land could only be bought by using gold or silver.
Historian Major L. Wilson said, quote, all that did was to make cash-poor farmers more dependent on capital-rich speculators.
It magnified the fraud the president meant to expunge.
And obliged his loyalists to fight little bank wars in every state of the Union.
Banks ran low on gold and silver reserves as millions of dollars' worth were taken out to be used in land speculation or just privately hoarded, leaving banks vulnerable to calls on deposits.
All this led directly to the Panic of 1837, where the country was plunged into a deep recession that lasted until the mid-1840s, during which time unemployment reached over 20% in many areas.
Andrew Jackson was a really stupid president.
His actions destroyed the economy for years.
Also a really dumb point, Alex yells all the time about the Democrats being the party of the KKK and how Lincoln was a Republican and all this stuff, so they're the ones who are really the cool ones with the racial tip.
But by that same logic and ignoring how parties have completely changed, you could make the argument that Democrats are the party that broke up banks since Andrew Jackson was a Democrat.
Anyway, he almost destroyed the entire economy through his stupid and short-sighted and petty actions against the second bank of the United States.
Lawrence was born in England, which I guess must be proof that he's an agent of the Crown.
He moved to Virginia at age 12, and as he grew up, he found work as a house painter.
A lot of people have researched Lawrence, theorized that the lead and other chemicals in the paints of the day probably contributed to his mental decline as he reached the age of 30 and on.
In 1932-33, he started to tell his family that he was going back to England, only to return a month later, generally with a fanciful story about how he couldn't go.
The first time he complained it was too cold to sail to England, so he just came back.
The second time, the story was much more troubling.
He'd been in Philadelphia for a bit, and when he returned, he claimed that the U.S. government didn't approve of him going to England, and that he had read several articles in the Philadelphia newspaper that were, quote, critical of his travel plans and character.
Richard quit his job, and when his family asked how he was going to afford to live, he told them that he was Richard III, the King of England, who had died 380 years earlier.
For reasons that aren't entirely clear, he also came to believe that Andrew Jackson's vetoing of the Second Bank of the United States made it impossible for him to collect monies he was owed on the estates.
He reasoned that if he killed Jackson, Martin Van Buren would become president, he'd set up a central bank, and just like that...
At this point, Richard started dressing up like British royalty.
At times, he would fall into severe laughing or cursing fits, and the trend of him verbally and physically assaulting his sisters began to appear, which is always there.
He would go on to face trial, where the prosecuting attorney was none other than Francis Scott Key, who mere years earlier had written the Star Spangled Banner.
Richard was found innocent by virtue of insanity and locked up in an asylum until his death 26 years later.
In the aftermath of the assassination attempt, with people trying desperately to find a reason for it, rumors spread that he was working for the proponents of the Second Bank of the United States, a theory that literally had no proof, no backing in evidence at all.
In a move that would be mirrored by at least one president I can think of, Andrew Jackson encouraged these conspiracy theories As it helped make him look heroic and demonized his enemies.
So, it was a crazy dude, not an agent of the bank.
I think it was at least a couple of years ago, a friend of the show, Matt Drufke, sent me this video of somebody who had done essentially my Andrew Jackson bit on his album.
I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country.
Corporations have been enthroned.
An era of corruption will follow and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign Picture Tim Geithner, who can also go fuck himself.
In all of Abraham Lincoln's collected works and writings, you can't find that quote because it's fake, and it didn't appear until 20 years after Lincoln's death during the 1896 presidential election.
So why did someone release a bogus letter about nefarious forces trying to meddle in the economy during the 1896 election?
It's hard to say for sure, but one pretty strong guess is that the gold standard was one of the top issues in that election, and Williams Jennings Bryan was running as a Democratic nominee.
and had just delivered his cross of gold speech at the Democratic National Convention.
It makes sense that this would be an issue that would come back up in terms of, and everybody likes to try and take historical heroes and pretend they said things that were predicted or supported their cause.
Well, yeah, because in 1950, Archer H. Shaw released the Lincoln Encyclopedia, which purported to be a one-stop shop for all things Lincoln.
The problem is that he didn't do his due diligence in terms of authenticating things he put in the encyclopedia.
He includes the letter that this quote comes from in that encyclopedia, a letter supposedly to Colonel William F. Elkins, but historians and researchers have clearly determined that that letter was a forgery.
Far from the only example of the lack of completionism in his book, and thus it's not seen as a well-put-together resource for information.
But I could see Gerald Salanti or Alex seeing that book called the Lincoln Encyclopedia and assuming everything in it was unquestionably true and not taking any further steps of research.
So I think that that's what they did here, and I would say that you get half credit for that.
So Webster Tarpley here is saying that, you know...
All of these things about there's no labor, no automotive, or any of that stuff.
It's all Wall Street.
So I decided to take each of these claims one by one and look into them and see if there was any truth to it.
So his first claim there in that laundry list was, there's nobody from heavy industry.
Heavy industry is a pretty rangy term.
It usually means steel mills, that sort of thing.
Businesses that are in heavy industries are also often involved in defense contracts and aerospace work.
But in February 2009, Obama appointed Ron Bloom as the senior advisor to the Secretary of the Treasury.
Previously, Ron Bloom had been in both the arenas of labor relations and steel business because he was the special assistant to the president of United Steelworkers.
So that one doesn't seem to be true.
seems to have a representative of heavy industry in there, at least one.
So I know that that claim is substantively not true.
He said, too, that there's nobody from the auto sector.
That one might be accurate, but it does seem like Obama didn't, you know, it doesn't seem like I can't find any auto executives in his cabinet or Which, considering where they were at the time, probably a good idea.
When he was coming into office, General Motors and Chrysler were both facing bankruptcy and needed to be bailed out by the government, so maybe it wasn't the time to have auto executives being given advisory positions.
Alex's whole thing is that oil companies are secretly owned by the Rockefellers and the queens of England and Denmark, so I have no idea why someone in an Alex Jones documentary would be complaining that big oil doesn't have a seat at Obama's table.
It honestly feels like it would be something Alex would brag about if it wasn't Obama.
I'm not sure what the line is for what counts as big oil, but Defense Secretary Robert Gates formerly worked for Parker Drilling, which is a company involved in...
And offshore oil rigs.
So that one doesn't really seem true.
Also, National Security Advisor James L. Jones is on the board of directors for Chevron before he was in the administration.
So, boom.
There's nobody from defense.
That's his other claim.
His next one, that's ludicrous.
The aforementioned Robert Gates was the Secretary of Defense under George W. Bush.
Whether you agree with him or not about how he does his job.
The aforementioned Ron Bloom had a previous career in labor unions at United Steelworkers.
Obama's Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis had a career in the House of Representatives that was full of sponsoring and supporting labor-friendly legislation.
She was the only member of Congress on the board of the American Rights to Work, a pro-union organization that she'd been involved in for years.
From her time in the House, she received a consistent 100% rating from pro-labor groups.
So that one's bullshit, too.
He said there's no women.
That's flagrantly false.
To wit, there was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, EPA Director Lisa Jackson, Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, UN Ambassador Susan Rice, Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis, and that's not even a complete list.
This is just another example of Webster Tarbley talking shit.
But there's tons of lawyers in his cabinet, and a lot of them pretty conceivably had to go through the process of setting up their own private practice.
And that's kind of the same thing as running a small business.
Also, Trump's small business administrator is Linda McMahon, owner of the WWE who just got paid millions of dollars to put on a show for the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia after he was implicated in the murder and dismemberment of a Washington Post journalist critical of the Saudi government.
And also, the people who actually have involvement in Wall Street, there weren't that many.
There are only like three or four people that you can make an argument out of the 22 cabinet positions that are the official cabinet that have any real history in Wall Street.
The quote that Alex and all of his anti-Federal Reserve propagandists point to to justify that sort of a claim in that narrative is as follows.
Quote, our great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit.
Our system of credit is privately concentrated.
The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men who, if their actions be honest and intended for the public interest, are necessarily concentrated upon the great undertakings in which their own money is involved and who necessarily, by reason of their own limitations, chill and check and destroy the genuine economic freedom.
We've come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world.
No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of small group of dominant That's the quote that Alex is using to justify this argument that Woodrow Wilson apologized just before his death about what he had done to create the Federal Reserve.
The problem with this...
This is a mishmash of two paragraphs of Woodrow Wilson's writing combined to give the impression that this was what he was saying.
The first paragraph comes from a speech that he gave at the Democratic Club in Harrisburg, PA, on June 15, 1911.
And the other was from a book he wrote called The New Freedom, which was published in 1913.
Both of these passages were written before the Federal Reserve was created in December 1913 and have nothing to do with the effects of the Fed.
The way Alex Jones is presenting this information is demonstrably fraudulent.
Anyway, the deceitful interpretation of Wilson's word began making the rounds in the 1950s as the Cold War got moving and anti-communist propagandists like Alex Jones' spiritual godfathers and what have you became ascendant.
So the Phyllis Schlafly's of the world, John Birch Society were coming into form and this narrative was crafted as part of their story that Woodrow Wilson regretted creating the Federal Reserve when it couldn't have been since he said the things before the Federal Reserve existed.
But in terms of Alex's claims, all that's important is that Alex is just regurgitating two passages Frankenstein monstered together by 1950s anti-communist propagandists.
So, real quick, Alex is trying to imply that the reason that Kennedy was assassinated was because he signed this Executive Order 11110 that would begin the process of eliminating the Federal Reserve.
Now, that executive order wouldn't have abolished the Federal Reserve, and in fact, it's a fantastic example of how stupid Alex Jones is, even about the topic he's made his bread and butter.
Frankly, this is just another example of Alex parroting conspiracy theories that others have promulgated and pretending he knows what he's talking about.
In this case, he's just repeating things that were written in Jim Marr's conspiracy theory book, Crossfire.
To explain Executive Order 11110, I first need to explain to you Public Law 88-36, which is what the Executive Order exists to be a complement to.
In 1961, President Kennedy realized that the demand for silver to be used as an industrial metal was increasing at a rate that made its value far greater than the price it enjoyed as a currency.
Emerging markets like microchips, nuclear reactors, medical applications, and semiconductors were all boosting silver, which led to an approximately 80% drop in the United States'excess silver reserves.
Noticing that this could be a problem, Kennedy called on Congress to act.
I again urge a revision in our silver policy to reflect the status of silver as a metal for which there is an expanding industrial demand.
Except for its use in coins, silver serves no useful monetary function.
I recommend authorization for the Federal Reserve System to issue notes in denominations of $1 so as to make possible the gradual withdrawal of silver certificates from circulation and the use of silver thus released from coinage purposes.
So in response, Congress passed H.R. 5389 in 1963 with large majorities in the House and Senate.
This would go on to become Public Law 8836, the main effect of which was repealing the Silver Purchase Act of 1934.
After public law 8836, the government signaled a shift away from silver and towards Federal Reserve notes.
One of the elements of this whole thing was granting the Federal Reserve the authority to issue $1 and $2 bills.
$1 bills were originally released in 1928 as silver certificates, hence the silver dollar.
But after JFK passed this public law and the ensuing executive order, the Federal Reserve actually expanded its responsibilities as far as issuing currency is concerned.
All the executive order did was allow the Treasury Department to issue silver certificates in the interim period while the transition was happening.
Alex's theory relies on the idea that Executive Order 11110 was an attempt by JFK to take the power to print money away from the Federal Reserve and give that power to the Treasury, but a closer look at the order itself as well as the context surrounding it.
Make it clear that that's the opposite of what it did.
There's no way these acts could justify an argument that the Federal Reserve was mad at JFK about this.
He did make overtures towards intending to remove troops from Vietnam, but the time he was in office saw a 500% increase in troops that were in Vietnam.
He did withdraw some troops, but the overall number expanded greatly during his time in office.
I don't see that as a good argument.
And then also he says there that he was trying to make real civil rights change.
I mean, you don't get a fucking degree from Princeton, get a Fulbright scholarship to study in Italy, and then get a PhD just without some sort of fortitude.
And it doesn't even make sense if you take the entire picture of his presidency, which has to take into context the presidency before and then the presidency after.
You shouldn't be allowed to...
Cherry-pick history.
I don't mean it like this, but some people should have restricted access to history.
I'm not sure what Tarpley's take on it is, but a lot of people in the Alex Jones intellectual sphere of his influences and those people, most of them didn't like Nixon at all either.
So at least...
There's that.
They're not Nixon supporters.
Unfortunately, most of them supported George Wallace.
unidentified
So it's not better.
So at least they didn't like Nixon, but bad news, they wanted segregation.
There is an irresponsibility that people like this do.
And the way that they get away with it is they are so nonspecific about what they're talking about that it called to task for saying, the last real president was Kennedy.
The idea that Obama is somebody who's going to come in and exercise real authority, when he's obviously been chosen and given everything that he's got.
So before this graphic came up, Alex was saying and reporting that at a secret meeting, David Rockefeller defined the New World Order as serving the international banking elite.
You're gonna make an argument entirely based around the globalists and Bilderberg being the most horrible thing that's ever been and you're gonna get your fucking dates wrong?
It's Dan, and that is where we're going to just have to leave off for today's first episode here.
Yeah, I mean, hey, we got a cliffhanger here.
Did the media come out and say that the New World Order was here?
Did they announce that?
Is Alex talking about something real, or is this yet another load of bullshit that he's trying to peddle in this documentary?
You have to tune in tomorrow to find out.
Guys, thanks so much for listening.
We do have a website.
It's knowledgefight.com.
We're on Twitter at knowledge underscore fight.
We are on Facebook over there.
Facebook, excuse me.
We have a group called Go Home and Tell Your Mother You're Brilliant, which is really where a lot of the real action goes on in terms of Facebook because I'm really terrible at upkeeping the Facebook page.
I'm not good at it.
You can find us over on iTunes.
Please do subscribe.
That's the best way to probably keep up with stuff because, again, I'm terrible at social media.
I've got too many other plates I'm spinning with this show.
I hope you're enjoying it.
Like I said, we're back for part two of the Obama Deception coverage.
And by that I mean I lose my patience with this documentary as it goes on longer and longer.
Thank you all so much.
Since I'm just doing a little bumper here, I don't have anybody to reference who hasn't killed anybody.
I'm the only person sitting in this room.
I haven't killed anybody, but I know one guy who has.
Technically, theoretically has killed someone, and that's a guy who goes by the name of Alex Jones.