Today, Dan and Jordan go into the past to see what Alex Jones was up to back in 2009. On this installment, the gents discuss how truth can't really penetrate propaganda, and find an unexpected but ultimately predictable entry point for Alex Jones into the Tea Party.
This little edition of The Spice Report, something from my old podcast where I would go and eat really spicy foods and come report back to the audience about it.
I went and I tested myself with their secret level.
We will be going over March 15th through 19th, 2009, which is a little answer to our prayers in as much as we've, you know, like, the last couple 2009 episodes have been one day in 2009.
You have to keep pushing forward even when it looks like nothing is going right.
When it looks like you're going to end up with a deadline when Jordan's going to show up at your house and all you've got are clips of Alex being like, I'm at South by Southwest with a bullhorn having fun with the filmmakers.
Oh my god, what have I got?
I've got Richard Linklater's associate producer in studio talking about the globalists.
I don't want to do that, but you keep pushing forward.
I think I found something incredibly huge that will recontextualize almost everything about Alex Jones in 2009, and it's the product of keeping pushing forward when the going is done.
The chimpanzee was actually on the Today Show the next day after ripping that woman's face off to defend its actions, and it literally did say it was on Xanax.
And then Alex, at the end of the show, has one of his vaccine experts, Barbara Lowe Fisher, on the show to talk about how bad vaccines are.
We've already talked about Barbara, so we don't need to really dive too deep into her nuttiness, but it bears repeating that this is one of their big arguments.
This is one of the arguments that one of Alex Jones' vaccine experts is making, and it's a bad sign.
unidentified
And I think that this is where I have a lot of trouble with this sort of greater good argument that they keep making.
The argument is you don't have the right as an individual parent to make that choice for your child because if you don't make the choice that the government says you need to make, in this case, get vaccinated, you put your neighbor's child at risk.
I've always said if the vaccines are as effective as the companies have said they are, then...
Then the vaccinated should have nothing to fear from those who choose not to get vaccinated.
If your vaccine expert is coming at you with the argument that, hey, if everybody is vaccinated, they shouldn't have anything to fear for people not being vaccinated.
And if you follow her argument to its logical conclusion, then as a person who is vaccinated, I just get to watch wide swaths of children die as they spread the disease back and forth to each other while I am immune to it.
Now, the 18th is a really interesting time in the Alex Jones show because he starts out the broadcast by talking about how he's going to be simulcasting with Judge Andrew Napolitano.
Because that's the big thing that's going on right now for Alex.
Despite the fact that he's in a little bit of a South by Southwest holding pattern and what have you, the MIAC report is still the big news.
And what's interesting is on this episode, March 18th, Alex purports to have evidence of the, like, this, some guy called the Missouri police and recorded it.
And it's some sort of a damning thing for Alex.
So he's teasing that he's going to play this audio of a guy talking to the Missouri police.
And I'm like, I can't imagine that'll be damning.
I imagine that the cop will just be like, no comment or anything like that.
And one of the concerns is why are people that are part of this liberty movement being labeled or targeted or potentially profiled in this report as really leads one to believe that this is a list of potential domestic terrorist suspects?
Well, if you read that, I don't see anywhere in that report where it targets anybody, where it profiles anybody, or where it labels anybody of anything.
Is it a terrorist or a militia group member or anything like that?
And to think that any law enforcement officer or agency would target somebody for a political affiliation, I think, is inappropriate.
So, like, let's leave aside the fact that the cop is saying that it's inappropriate to assume that cops would target someone for their political beliefs.
He's not going to be like, hey, look, we profile a lot of fucking people, but this time, whites, you're good.
unidentified
And the report just simply does not say that.
Well, I appreciate that.
What is your understanding of why the Constitution Party, Chuck Baldwin, Bob Barr, and Ron Paul, mention of people displaying Ron Paul bumper stickers, why is there a mention of that in the report?
Well, if you read the report, I don't think there's a mention of bumper stickers at all anywhere in the eight-page report, so obviously you haven't read the entirety of the report, or you're looking at a report that's...
And this next clip, I think, really drives home...
A point that we've been making for almost the entirety of this podcast, but it's really interesting to see it demonstrated in real time.
unidentified
I can't speak for why you think that there's something in the report that says people who have a Ron Paul bumper sticker or any political affiliation bumper sticker on their car would be targeted.
That's just simply not true, and it's not in the report.
Is there reference to the so-called patriot movement or people who are opposed to North American Union or the New World Order in there?
Well, there's some information in there regarding certain militia groups and those violent factions that operate within those militia groups.
It details their certain belief systems and what political parties or candidates they might associate themselves with.
But certainly the document doesn't say that anybody who's affiliated with a certain political candidate or a political party is certainly...
A militia member, a terrorist, or anything like that.
Also, in a militia or a terrorist is a disjunction.
That's or.
It generally means one or the other.
It's not saying that they're equivalent or the same thing at all.
So now what you see here, this is interesting to me, because what Alex Jones has just done is very accurately, he's played an accurate debunking of his narrative on the show.
That cop is absolutely correct in terms of the inference problem that they are making, that Alex's propaganda is making.
The idea that these dangerous groups that we have studied, they show these signs.
That isn't to say that if you exhibit those signs, you should be suspected of being a member of one of these dangerous groups.
That he has just completely laid out exactly why Alex is wrong.
So you'd think Alex would play that and be like, guys, we fucked up this one.
We have a Dr. Chuck Baldwin, Constitutional Party presidential candidate 2008, who was basically listed as a terrorist leader by the state police propaganda document put out in Missouri, written by the feds, and that's what the document does.
I gave a speech on the radio this morning to a crowd saying that, oh, we're going to fix the illegal alien problem because we're just going to legalize them.
The American people want to legalize them.
unidentified
They just want them to be official and legal and have papers.
But just off the charts report, PrisonPlanet.com, Paul Watson, House passes mandatory national service bill.
The House passed a bill yesterday which includes disturbing language indicating young people will be forced to undertake mandatory national service programs as fears about President Obama's promised civilian national security force intensify.
Watson's being too timid here, like he always is.
If you read the bill that passed, it says forced service, so I'm going to read it.
Also, Alex is completely misrepresenting this bill, because of course he is.
From a write-up on fact check, the initial version of the bill that was introduced in the House, quote, called for a congressional commission to address and analyze several topics, including issues that deter volunteerism and how they can be overcome, how expanding international public service might affect diplomacy and foreign relations, and whether a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people could be developed and how such a requirement could be implemented in a manner that would strengthen the social fabric of the nation.
The version that passed the House had this language completely stripped from it.
The version that passed the Senate never included such language at all.
Even Orrin Hatch said on the Senate floor, quote, Because Alex is saying that the bill passed and not that the bill was introduced, it's very clear that he's lying or that the only thing he knows about the bill is based on the article on his site written by Paul Joseph Watson, who is way too sloppy to know that a bill can be rewritten in committee or any other place in debates.
So the bill that's introduced is not always the same as the bill that's voted on.
It's pretty clear this is just another example of Paul Joseph Watson having zero professionalism as a journalist and reporting something completely inaccurate because it fits Infowars'predetermined news.
Drug head, know-it-all video game players who've been playing all these violent games.
Who've all been primed for this, they're going to love their new authority through the government, and they're going to be running around in their uniforms, and they'll come to the dinner table at night and boss you around, and, hey, Mom, hey, Dad, I'm with the Hitler youth now.
I mean, this has been done everywhere, and this is the...
Mao did it, Hitler did it, Stalin did it, Lenin did it, Pol Pot did it, Fidel Castro did it.
This is the most stinking, out-of-control tyranny you can get.
I just want to tell all the young snot-nosed punks, Don't try running a checkpoint with me.
Don't try coming up and tasering me.
I just can't handle it anymore.
I can't handle the scumbag bankers robbing this country and the classical tyranny they're setting up and the dumbass public that doesn't know that tyranny's looking down the barrel of a gun at them.
It's almost weird that these people have the exact same angle that, you know, conveniently makes the same logical fallacy in order to excuse the fact that a lot of people who support them end up in violent militias.
Dear Governor Nixon, the three of us write you as former presidential candidates, as concerned citizens, and in the case of Ron Paul, as a sitting member of the U.S. House of Representatives, and Bob Barr as a former member, 1995 to 2003.
We bring to your attention the most disturbing document being circulated by the Missouri Information Analysis Center, MIAC, over the seal of your office and your name as governor.
We respectfully demand that the following described document be immediately removed from any and all websites associated with or maintained by the state of Missouri or any agency thereof, including the MIAC.
That the said document no longer be circulated by the state of Missouri or any agency thereof or associated therewith.
That the state of Missouri repudiate its references to the three of us as contained therein.
The document to which we refer is identified as follows, and a copy enclosed herewith.
So them getting together and writing a letter to Jay Nixon, the governor of Missouri, to be like, this is a slanderous document and how dare you allow them to say that our supporters are suspected of being in these militias and dangerous groups.
They're taking that propaganda angle that is the misrepresentation of the association that the MIAC document did, and they're weaponizing it against the very law enforcement agencies and the governor of Missouri in order to get them to not be able to express a truth, a truth that people in these groups do support them.
That's terrorism to some extent.
That's information terrorism.
And they're able to do it because people like Bob Barr, people like Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin have social capital.
And it is the central truth that if a bunch of powerful white people get together and bitch, things will change because everybody is just like, fucking fine, just go away already.
And then it keeps happening, and it keeps happening.
All of those credits that they open up that letter with are a damning indictment of our government and the electorate, of, like, Ron Paul, sitting member of the United States.
The part that I think that he's tipping his hand about a little bit is, like, the listing of cop killers and stuff like that at the beginning are militias.
Like, he's trying to pretend that they aren't the same thing.
And then as to his claim that, you know, violent militias don't exist...
I'd like to take you back to 1818, when Georgia militiamen slaughtered members of the peaceful Cheeha tribe in retaliation for things that were done by other tribes.
They knew in advance that the Cheeha tribe were a friendly group, and not the ones who did what they were mad at, but decided to take out their anger on them anyway.
If you go back in time, you'll find tons and tons of examples of exactly this racially motivated violence done by militia groups, but that's going too far back.
So let's just mention the Bundy Ranch, the Malhoor Wildlife Standoff, the Oklahoma...
city bombing the unite the right rally in charlottesville and then there's the countless disrupted plots of militia members trying to bomb mosques all false flags or take over army bases and then there was fear the militia of non-commissioned servicemen who planned to poison an apple field and blow up a dam as part of their plan to take over fort stewart in georgia their plot was uncovered so in retribution they killed a 19 year old named michael rourke and his 17 year old girlfriend tiffany york and threw their bodies in a lake because they thought rourke had snitched then of
Of course, there's everything that the Oath Keepers have ever done, but that's a matter for another time.
There's tons and tons of militia violence, even in present day, dating back to 1818.
The history of militias have largely been pretending to be there to stand up.
Well, that's one of the reasons that you're like, this is all stolen valor bullshit, because they're getting their idea of a plan to achieve an objective from Ocean's Eleven.
You know, like, it all has to be, like, this elaborate con, and...
An actual plan is like, how do we make as few moving parts as possible?
If you go back and you look at the raid on Osama Bin Laden's house, it's not like, okay, so here's what we're going to do.
We're going to build a catapult, and we're going to get one of the Navy SEAL Team 6 guys in there, and he's going to have padding, and we're going to launch him over that wall, and he's going to land like a cat, and finally he's going to fight Obama or Osama.
They know damn well that they are not going to pursue any legal action because if they went to court with this shit, guess what?
All of it would be proven true.
They could never, ever get into any under oath situation where the guys are actually just providing a list of violent actors, a list of violent militias, all of whom are...
Whenever they, you know, the right and the Alex Joneses and the Patriots, all these people crow on all day about responsibility.
And they talk nonstop about, you know, standing up.
For truth and all this.
And here you have a situation where there's a report that comes out that just says that people who are in dangerous militias tend to like these people.
And those people can't handle that.
So they lie about it and threaten the law enforcement people to be like, don't say that!
I'm doing editing even here on the air, ladies and gentlemen.
It's insane.
We're joined for the rest of the hour, and I apologize for getting him on late, but we decided to have that state police officer on.
But it's a perfect segue into this.
Stuart Rhodes created a great website.
He's a constitutional lawyer.
But masses of military and police have been saying they pledged to be oath-keepers and not violate the Bill of Rights Constitution and to follow their oath.
And when I read it, I said, this person has a deep knowledge of what's going on, because this is how I would have written it, probably better than I would have written it.
Because just like that gentleman there just did, we want them to be able to continue their job and continue doing the good work for the American people.
Stuart Rhodes was a paratrooper for a time, but he was injured in a night parachuting accident and received an honorable discharge from the service.
So, thank you for your service.
In 2008, Rhodes would go on to be a volunteer for Ron Paul's campaign for president.
In his advocacy, one of the things that really seems to have stuck out for him was how unfair it was for people to associate Ron Paul with things like racism and right-wing extremists.
Far be it from us to remind everyone of the attempted takeover of Dominica and, of course, Ron Paul's racist newsletter that had his name on it and was written in the first person.
After the failure of Ron Paul to become president, Rhodes decided to change approach.
Noticing the rising tide of the early Tea Party movement, Rhodes established the Oath Keepers.
So, recognizing an opportunity to piggyback on the burgeoning Tea Party, Rhodes sent out representatives to 30 of the 4th of July 2009 Tea Party protests around the country, and in doing so, he successfully associated his movement with that of the Tea Party.
But before that...
Here he is on Alex Jones' show, pitching the Oath Keepers to him.
I didn't know when we were going over that stuff on the last episode that literally right around the corner was going to be the founder of the Oath Keepers about a month into the Oath Keepers existing, coming on Alex's show, and the two of them getting along like best friends.
Well, I was working for, in Congress, Paul's campaign here in Nevada.
I used to work in his D.C. office.
But I was still focused on the campaign.
But about a year and a half ago, I had the idea that, you know, what do we do next?
And if this campaign is not successful, what's our next move?
And my thought was, well, Let's have our focus of effort be on the men with the guns.
If you're going to have an awakening of one million people, if you're going to have a chance to awaken one million people to be constitutionalists, would you want to focus on the military?
And those are the men who are supposed to be our guardians.
And also there's pretty good indications that there's sort of a systemic culture within a lot of the organizations of the Oath Keepers that are deeply racist.
But on this appearance, Stewart comes in hot with an analogy.
We're still a couple months away from the 4th of July when he sends out everybody to these Tea Party rallies and deeply insinuates the Oath Keepers with the Tea Party, which I have a major theory about at the end of this episode.
But Alex gets in such a good mood that he comes back from break singing along with a little song that he's clearly trying to implant in his audience's mind is actually...
And going back to the Mordor analogy, you have the tower, the mountain of power with the all-seeing eye with its armies moving across the world, but right here in its command base, right here in Empire U.S., it is distracted looking.
Looking everywhere for the ring.
That's what this MIAC report is.
They're counting on the police and military being Uruk-hai or orcs.
You're absolutely right, and that's why Oath Keepers...
We always stress that this was a first...
We contemplated and first planned before the election.
We didn't care who got elected.
It didn't make a difference who was going to be president.
We thought it was executive power.
And we're talking about active-duty military and veterans.
And these gentlemen don't care who's president.
We're looking at the big picture.
We stay neutral on politics.
We stay neutral on the Iraq war.
I'll be speaking at a big event in June, a big pro-trups rally in June.
I was invited by a former Navy SEAL captain.
Larry Bailey of Gathering of Eagles.
So a lot of the more hardcore conservative groups who might not have listened during Bush are starting to wake up and understand what the great danger is.
It really is hard to hear him say, like, there's these hardcore conservative groups that probably wouldn't have listened during Bush, but now understand the danger and not hear the fucking code in there.
You said they weren't paying attention during a white president, and then a black president was elected, and now they're waking up a bunch of hardcore conservatives.
Uh, well, I mean, just also to stress, and I paused it, but, like, I love it anytime Alex complains about people shitting on other patriot leaders, because that's literally, he hates Savage back then.
Shits on Glenn Beck, hates Fox News, all the, like, all the people that he's now, well, except for Glenn Beck, but all these other people who he's, like, in bed with, oh, you guys are all fake.
You guys are led by the globalists.
All right.
So Alex makes a proclamation here, and I think this is like the moment where Alex is like, I love you, Stuart.
So, Rhodes, Stuart Rhodes, insists that his group, the Oath Keepers, is just a fellowship of patriotic former law enforcement and enlisted people who see tyranny rising and are united by their promise to hold true to their enlistment oaths to protect America from enemies foreign and domestic.
Also, when I was writing that sentence, I forgot that a lot of them are also current law enforcement and military people.
But be that as it may, a closer analysis of their actions show that that's not even close to the truth, and that they're actually an organization that fosters domestic terrorists and subscribes to a crypto-racist worldview.
On April 15, 2009, Oathkeeper Daniel Knight Hayden tweeted out that he was, quote, locked and loaded for the Oklahoma State Capitol.
Let's see what happens.
In another tweet, he said, quote, maybe it's time to die.
Let's see if I can video record the highway patrol at the entrance of the Oklahoma State Capitol while trying to inform them of the Oath Keepers and post it to the Internet.
Since I live on this sorry fucking state, that's as good a place as any to die and start a war, all capital letters.
And no matter what happens, post it on the Internet immediately and send it to Alex Jones.
He would go on to say, quote, The war will start on the steps of the Oklahoma State Capitol.
I will cast the first stone.
In the meantime, I await the police.
Start the killing now.
I am willing to be the first death.
Though he was an avowed member of both the Tea Party and the Oath Keepers, right-wing outlets like the Free Republic immediately began trying to paint Hayden as a leftist.
And how this was just a plot to make right-wing groups look bad.
On January 10, 2010, former Marine and Oathkeeper Charles Dyer was arrested on charges of raping a seven-year-old child.
When authorities searched his home, they found a grenade launcher that was reported as stolen from a California military base.
Previously, Dyer had been charged with, quote, making disloyal comments or statements in reference to YouTube videos he had released where he actively called for armed violent resistance to the government.
He was acquitted of the charges and would go on to produce videos where he literally said that he intended to become a domestic terrorist.
True to his word, when Charles was due to appear in court for his trial, he didn't show up and ended up leading the FBI on an almost week-long manhunt, during which time he posted cryptic threats to law enforcement that they better not catch up with him.
When he was finally caught without incident and tried, the charges related to the grenade launcher were dropped when he claimed that he didn't know it was a grenade launcher and thought it was a flamethrower.
The child rape charges, however, he was found guilty of and sentenced to 30 years in prison.
As all the legal trouble mounted and these things came to light, Stuart Rhodes attempted to distance himself and the Oath Keepers from Charles Dyer.
He claimed that Dyer hadn't paid the $30 membership fee, so he wasn't really an Oath Keeper, despite the fact that there is no fee to become a member of the group.
Rhodes didn't want to own Dyer as one of his own members, which is really difficult to square with the reality, because videos produced by Oath Keepers list Charles Dyer as the group's, quote, official liaison to the Marine Corps.
He was their official liaison to the Marine Corps.
To make matters worse, Dyer had spoken at a 4th of July 2009 Tea Party event as a representative of the Oath Keepers, and the publication Hate Trackers found a note...
He was a consultant.
Again, we see this trend continuing of people gleefully profiting off radicalizing people and encouraging them down a violent, dangerous path, then pretending they had nothing to do with them once the radicalized party reaches the logical conclusion of the path they were on.
Then, of course, there was the case of Darren Huff, the Oathkeeper who plotted to take over Madisonville, Tennessee, with the help of his militia buddies.
We talked about this on the last episode, so there's no need to dwell on this one too much.
There's one interesting note to make here, though, about how these groups are too cowardly to own their own filth.
On March 20th, 2017, Jerome Corsi got on The Alex Jones Show and told Alex that Darren Huff's arrest was the result of the same illegal surveillance that had been revealed by Joe Arpaio and Mike Zullo, thanks to their super-snowed-in whistleblower...
Dennis Montgomery.
Corsi was attempting to tie Darren Hough's arrest in with the Montgomery information.
Leaving aside that the Dennis Montgomery information is complete bullshit, Hough was under surveillance because he told a bank teller that he was going to take over Madisonville, and the bank teller called the authorities.
Well, because years later, Jerome Corsi is trying to excuse Darren Hough's attempt to take over Madisonville, Tennessee, because Darren Hough was a birther.
He was also a really big Obama-can't-be-president guy, so it fits in with their oppression narrative of people who believe the same things they do.
Because Jerome Corsi wrote multiple books about that.
So you have him going way out of his way to excuse this militia guy who wanted to take over Madisonville, Tennessee, because it helps them.
Then, of course, there was Matthew Fairfield, who we talked about on the last episode, who was arrested for making and housing a bunch of bombs, including a napalm bomb, which, according to experts, is, quote, specifically designed for use on other people.
Matthew Fairfield, who, of course, was the president of the Cleveland chapter of the Oath Keepers.
Then we got in May 2015, Oathkeeper John Ritzheimer came to the focus of the media after he started wandering around in front of a Phoenix mosque wearing a shirt that said, fuck Islam.
Then he decided to hold that Draw Muhammad contest outside the mosque.
Well, pretty soon after all that, John would start a GoFundMe campaign seeking $10 million to help him live off the grid because people were trying to kill him.
In June 2015, he posted online that he was the victim of hacks and he was going to disappear for a while.
Imagine everyone's surprise when he reappeared in September 2015 to announce plans to arrest Michigan Senator Debbie Stabenow because she voted for the Iran deal.
He wrote to supporters, quote, We have chosen her as our first target due to our strong ties with the Michigan State militia and their lax gun laws, which will allow us to operate in the manner necessary for an operation like this.
Though he had a good six months of being a very publicly agitating dickhole against Muslims and being an overall embarrassment of a person.
This plan that he had to go and arrest Senator Debbie Stabenow was a bridge too far, and the Oath Keepers decide to go ahead and distance themselves from him at that point, which is probably smart.
Trying to exploit lax gun laws to arrest a sitting senator is probably the sort of thing that would lead to Ritzheimer killing a couple people, and it's probably best not to have to disavow the guy afterwards.
By 2015, they fucking learned that lesson from all these guys who were taking over Madisonville, Tennessee, making bombs, making napalm bombs, raping seven-year-olds.
It's the sort of thing that you're like, we kind of have got our disavowing game down.
These are just a few of the notable Oath Keepers who have run afoul of serious laws.
This isn't a coincidence, and it's not a couple of bad apples.
This list doesn't even begin to mention how they were involved in the Bundy Ranch or how the Oath Keepers planned to arrest the Pope when he came to the United States in 2015.
This doesn't touch on how the Oath Keepers showed up in Ferguson and, quote, protected almost exclusively white businesses after the protests there.
This doesn't touch on how in the Berkeley and Portland protests in 2017, propagandists like Jack Posobiec and his ilk have worked hard to convey the idea that the police and Oath Keepers are working on.
in concert.
Berkeley police officials naturally denied the claim.
But after American Freedom Keepers militia member Todd Kelsey was arrested, I'm sorry, was recorded helping police arrest protesters in Portland, though he's not a cop, it's not hard to see a kernel of truth.
So, what you have here with the Oath Keepers is an out-and-out white supremacist organization working hand-in-hand with an organization that doesn't like to say they're explicitly a white supremacy organization, and yet somehow always seem to act as one.
I don't think that you can say, like, I don't know, I'm not, I don't think your assessment is too unfair, but I think that you have a situation where I'm not going to say that all the Oath Keepers are...
operating on a very racist, crazy basis.
But man, there's a lot of them that are.
And a lot of them seem emboldened in many ways.
And a lot of them, through this brotherhood of folks who are just trying to uphold the Constitution, seem to take that to ends where they build bombs, try and get into shootouts with police, end up killing people, do these standoffs.
Do a draw Muhammad contest in order to antagonize entire populations of people and then beg for money because of the natural consequences of your actions?
And then you see the systemic things about how big groups of them often show up places like Ferguson, like in the aftermath of the Mexico Beach hurricane.
Doing very intentional damage control after people that he had buddied up with and helped down the path reach their conclusion.
When someone who is the official liaison to the Marine Corps ends up going bad and getting arrested for raping a seven-year-old and having a grenade launcher in his house, it's not like, oh, we're going to take responsibility for that.
You're going to say, oh, no, he wasn't even a part of our group to begin with.
You see it with everything that's going on in the present day.
Every time there's something bad that happens that's a natural consequence of the rhetoric that's put out, the violence, the excusing of white terrorism, all these sorts of things.
Whenever there is the bubbling over, whenever there's this guy who got caught and arrested for sending all the bombs to everybody, nah, he's not one of ours!
How dare you?
Oh, wait, here's a picture of him at a Trump rally from years ago.
I'm not saying in any way that everybody on the left is great at taking responsibility for things, but it is a dynamic feature of...
This world that we look at and that we study, the patriot movement, the liberty people, it's an inability to take responsibility for the reality of the shit that you put into the world.
It goes all the way back to their granddaddy and hero, Ron Paul, and his behavior with his newsletter.
You get the benefit of having what is essentially a violent, extrajudicial army intimidating people who otherwise wouldn't.
would definitely try and vote against you, while at the same time claiming loudly enough and frequently enough that it's not part of your group, that enough people will believe you that they won't do anything about it.
It's why Alex and Roger Stone sit down and say, we disavow violence, let's get out ahead of this thing, while screaming all sorts of, you all are demons and you must fall, sort of rhetoric.
I think it's kind of one of those things where I don't want to paraphrase this too badly or too poorly, but if you are stoking white supremacist violence, I know it when I see it.
I know the best way to go about it, but I also know, based on something we played earlier in this episode, it won't work.
And that is education.
And helping people understand things.
Because if people truly understood the motivations of the people that they're believing or that sort of thing or like, hey, you know, they're really just trying to get your money.
They're really just trying to cause...
Trouble that they can capitalize off of, you know, basically.
You know, there is a Socratic dialogue that you hope you'd be able to have with people and be able to get to the bottom of like, oh, all roads end up leading back to...
A reasoned discussion about how those studies that linked vaccines to autism were flawed, that's a nice starting ground, and hopefully you'd be able to demonstrate to them, like, all of these people know that.
All of those people who are telling you that vaccines...
know very well that these studies aren't accurate and they aren't real, but they're pushing it to you anyway because it serves their political purposes.
But you could do that with just about any of these narratives if someone were willing to.
But what you're demonstrating is exactly the truth.
No one's going to be willing to.
And the demonstration of that is that clip earlier where Alex plays the clip of the cop very well explaining what the MIAC report actually says and it doesn't do a lick of difference.
Because in order to get the population of deer to the level you're going to need, you're going to have to either fully restrict hunting, and that's going to get them really mad.
When kids are like nine or ten, we all send them to the hospital and they all take one test where it's just like there's a woman, not even that, just like a speaker with blonde hair on it, right?
And the speaker just says kind of like, oh, you look all right.
No big deal.
Just like very passive-aggressive stuff.
And if the kid winds up hitting the robot...
Then we're like, into the garbage can you go.
I'm not saying that we're going to put children into a garbage can.
And now we're seeing that, and then people realize they can defeat the enemy in the info war, and now they're just blasting, they're picking up arms in the revolution of the mind.
People are taking the red pills, they're waking up, and I'm seeing people like you from the Ron Paul campaign and others.
Out in the open, resisting the New World Order, speaking out, involved.
We are the majority.
We have to shatter that illusion that we're not the majority, and we have to get past the mind game of fear.
And so I think it's a great idea, whether it's anonymous, you write letters and post things, or other people should start other Oath Keeper sites, more groups, lots of people.
But it's good, in my experience, just to go past the point of no return and to commit.
It is interesting that we didn't even consider, like, when you first started this investigation, you did not have Oath Keepers on the list of things we were investigating.
Not necessarily.
We were both like, oh, Tea Party, that's the most obvious popular thing.
And then you get the reveal that it's the Oath Keepers, and you're like, that makes way more sense than the Tea Party!
Well, it's like the same thing, like, when we went back to 2015 to see about when he joined up with Trump, and we found, like, he doesn't like Trump, but he's saying Putin is the truth.
And, like, Putin might save the world, and stuff like that.
Right, so he didn't expect the not even really nationally relevant Oath Keepers to show up and that be the way that Alex...
So here's what I believe.
This is a theory.
I believe that this marks the beginning of Alex Jones getting involved with the Tea Party.
Though it isn't the Tea Party proper, it is the Oath Keepers, and they factor heavily into the story that remains to be told about the deterioration of politics that happens in 2009 and onwards.
A very good strategy to ensure that the Overton window is shifted in the direction you want it to is to offer two options that both head in that direction, one mild and one extreme.
The two sides probably don't even have to like each other.
The mild side says the extreme is childish and not serious.
The extreme side says that they're the true movement, and the mild side is controlled opposition.
In such a climate, you guarantee that more people will sign up with the mild side, but the very nature of their overlapping rhetorics will...
The people will join with the mild and ultimately find it unsatisfying and head for the more extreme stuff.
Once they start becoming acclimated to the extreme side, they'll find the answer as to why they weren't satisfied by the mild side, because it was controlled opposition all along.
Because the thing is, the pipe doesn't go the other direction.
In this example, Glenn Beck doesn't ever de-escalate things.
No one gets free of Alex Jones' propaganda by becoming a Glenn Beck fan.
No one deprograms from the Oath Keepers by falling in love with the peaceful anti-tax sign-holding demonstrators and realizes that civic action is the best way to effect changes that they want to see in society.
The slide goes downward, and every convert to the Tea Party is one more likely patriot movement recruit in waiting.
I'm not proposing that this was an elaborate plan or intentional.
That would be absurd conspiratorial thinking.
But I am suggesting that looking back on this, there could be no worse setup for the maintenance of a healthy body politic.
Once the GOP started embracing the Tea Party, they were possibly knowingly or possibly unwittingly embracing not only the extreme side, They were also embracing the mild side that really only ever existed to be a conduit to the extreme side.
And the extreme side of that is gone even farther.
So then center-left has actually turned into center-right, and center-right has turned into crazy-right, and crazy-right has turned into the violent militia group.
What we see here, I'm certain, is the beginnings of Alex Jones becoming the extreme, the mouthpiece of the extreme version of the Tea Party, which is characterized by the Oath Keepers.
This is his way to get in on the act that he sees Glenn Beck being very successful with without having to feel like he's sold out.
And I think that will carry through throughout.
Even when he starts associating more with the Tea Party, he can carry this torch of, I'm the real version of it.
This is the media, the globalist, tainted version of the Tea Party.
But it's good to go back and actually see them, because now we know, as opposed to just guessing.
So we have this MIAC report, I think.
With Alex Jones bringing on that cop, or playing that audio of the cop, very clearly explaining what the MIAC report is about, and it not making a dent in the propaganda armor, we see the hopelessness of engaging with folks like this, or at least with people like Alex.
You see the hopelessness and the intentional propaganda that's going on, as opposed to it just being a misunderstanding.
In addition to that, you see here the introduction of the Oath Keepers.
And what you're going to end up seeing, and this puts into perfect context why on the last episode when I told you I went back and I listened to the time around when that guy got caught with a napalm bomb in his house who was the head of the Cleveland chapter of the Oath Keepers and Alex was radio silent.
I have struggled through listening to all these boring episodes, but I'm glad that I did because we get now to the end, this reveal of Alex Jones giving his endorsement to the Oath Keepers.
Which I think is super important, and I think it will characterize the next gears of his program.
I think that we're going to see a lot of these things that we've been tracking in terms of these anachronistic politics that he has, whether it be he's anti-police in early 2009.