Today, Dan and Jordan follow up on the last episode and discuss how Alex Jones' narrative about all of his enemies receiving bombs has evolved, and not in a positive way. It's now a false flag the Democrats are doing to themselves, so the gents discuss how dangerous an idea this is, and how troubling it is that so much of the right wing media is on board with him about it.
And so, when I posted that episode, I was up until about 1.30 or so on Tuesday night, putting the episode up, went to bed, woke up in the morning, boot up the old computer, see how the world is doing.
Every time we've gone to sleep, in the past three days, Dan, every time we have gone to sleep, we have woken up to finding out another bomb has been sent somewhere.
I intentionally did that while you were taking a sip.
It's become so much that that all of the people are attacking all of these people.
So it almost becomes such a blur as to, like, what could motivate this?
To the point where, honestly, if the only way I would be convinced that this is Alex Jones motivated, not Trump, Tucker Carlson, all that, just the whole world of the right motivated, is if Brian Stelter got one.
This whole thing is just to mask that Scorsese is pissed off that De Niro spent those 20 years in the wilderness doing fucking meet the clumps movies or whatever it is he does.
There's no way for me to justify doing one of the other ones.
The will of the people is the Obama deception.
We must follow through with it.
So that will be coming up, and also there's a ton of website content that will be coming up if we reach that next goal that is driving me crazy.
But, for now, Jordan, I said at the top of the show that we didn't have all the information at our disposal when we did our last episode on Wednesday.
And unfortunately, I thought, well, the only responsible thing to do is now that there's more of the story available, as much as it sucks to talk about a present-day episode, I feel like it's our responsibility to jump in and do another present-day episode to go over what Alex Jones is talking about now.
Any resemblance to characters, living or dead, who have previously called for violence towards the media, the specific people who were bombed, they do not represent Alex Jones or Roger Stone, despite the fact that on...
Countless numbers of times they have called for direct violence towards these people.
So that pre-taped clip with Roger Stone is very clearly preemptive damage control.
Because I think that they probably got the sense of like, uh-oh, we better put out a video that we can play in court where we literally say, if somebody does something, it is not something we encourage.
So the other thing, too, that's really fun here is that in that clip that Alex plays right before his show, there's a little bit that he forgot to cut out of it.
Ladies and gentlemen, we are live broadcasting worldwide.
I am your host, Alex Jones, and we're 13 days out from the midterm elections, and all hell is breaking loose, obviously.
Coming up, I'm going to wait to the second hour, but we've got it all ready and prepared for you.
Dozens and dozens of clips, and I'm going to show you the news articles for yourself here in a moment, where in the last few months, you can go see it for yourself.
This is a situation where you just get into this stupid game that he plays that there's really no way out of without just saying, like, I'm out.
I reject this.
Because what he's describing is the media covering...
Trump's rhetoric, Alex's rhetoric, in such a way that they're saying, hey, you know, in history, a lot of times when people acted this way and demonized a certain population, that population ended up getting...
The stimulus, there's literally no difference between the reality of the media warning about something and Alex saying, oh, they're trying to demonize us.
What makes both sides do what they do is the same.
It's just that one side's reaction is super defensive and full of shit.
And there's really nothing you can do about that.
There's nothing you can do about it because me saying this, Alex would be like, oh, you're a fool.
You can't see through, you can't read between the lines.
And no right-wing media outlet is at all saying, like, None of them are even saying, let's hold on and find out who's done this before we preemptively defend our own terrorism.
They're admitting by defending it before we know anything that they know they are causing violence.
On our last episode, I said that Alex is responsible for this in a spiritual sense.
I still do believe that.
No matter who the person is, no matter what they are.
I still think that Alex has helped us get to the point in society in terms of the rhetoric that's acceptable, that sort of thing, that we can now be where we are.
But that is not to say that, like, I don't think it would be appropriate for us to be like, this was a right-wing guy for sure.
Now, in his next clip, Alex has been, he's made his thesis clear that the bombings, or the attempted bombings, of all of these Democrats, Robert De Niro, Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
About a month ago, a gentleman was busted in New York cooking up, he's pled guilty, a 200-pound bomb in his basement to bomb the Republicans to cancel the election.
He was going to detonate it inside the Washington Monument Mall on the morning of Election Day to try to cancel the election because the Republicans are going to try to steal the election or cancel it.
Alex is juxtaposing the stories of all of his enemies receiving mail bombs with a story about this guy out of New York who had worked on building a 200-pound bomb to blow up the National Mall on Election Day.
He's doing this and claiming that the man was a deranged leftist because he doesn't know anything, but this false narrative serves his purposes to present the idea that the Soros-Clinton-Obama bombs are false flags by the left.
The problem is that Paul Rosenfeld, the man who built that bomb, was not a leftist.
Nor is it any mystery as to what his intentions were in planning to blow up D.C. He wasn't angry at the Republicans, as Alex is reporting.
At least he was no more angry with them than he was at all government.
So Alex trying to say that this guy was mad at Republicans, and that's why he was going to blow up the National Mall, is foolish and stupid.
He doesn't know anything about the story, but he needs it in order to connect to this other story to try and reinforce the idea that all of these bombs are clearly some sort of a Democratic fault.
He talks about it like three times on this episode.
That's one of the things I care about.
Like, if he wants to present the idea that all of these are false flags, he shouldn't bring up a story to reinforce that belief that he doesn't know anything about and doesn't actually prove his point at all.
What Alex seems to now want to point out is that the headline is actually Brett Kavanaugh and the Information Terrorists, plural.
It's about people like Jack Posobiec, Mike Cernovich, and all those assholes who are weaponizing information, especially in the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation process.
That clearly, they're saying Trump's going to cause violence in the media when they're the ones calling for violence against him, 100 to 1. I know you are, but what am I?
The left calls for violence and carries out violence versus the right.
He's saying there that the left carries out violence against folks 100 to 1. 100 to 1. And so I looked into this a little bit, and I'm going to read you this here.
Quote, an analysis of the global terrorism database by researchers at the University of Maryland published in 2017 shows a sharp increase in the share of attacks by right-wing extremists from 6% in the 2000s to 35% in the 2010s.
Meanwhile, the share of attacks by left-wing terrorists and environmental extremists dropped from 64% in the 2000s to 12% in the 2010s.
And a lot of that is because of the 64% in the 2000s.
There's a lot of eco-terrorism and animal rights activism.
So those were the 2016, that study was in 2016, and so they wanted to look into it a little bit further.
Quote, an analysis by courts of the same global terrorism database confirmed that the trend persisted in 2017, where most attacks in the U.S. were committed by right-wing extremists.
Out of 65 incidents that year, 37 were tied to racist, anti-Muslim, homophobic, anti-Semitic, fascist, anti-government, or xenophobic motivations.
In that same set of data, 11 were left-leaning actors from 2017.
Of the 65, 11 were left-leaning actors.
And a closer review of the data shows that six of these left-leaning Right.
And when you expand that picture out, I think you'd find very similar things.
But in this case, because we're dealing with a person leaving bombs all over the place, and Alex is defensive about it, and talking about how the right wing doesn't do that stuff, it's always the left and shit like that, I feel like it's important to...
Look at this reality.
The only way for the right wing to discuss this element of reality is to present all the terrorism that is being done by their side as false flags.
There's literally no other way to avoid looking in the mirror and realizing that the statistics are terrifying.
Globally, the number of terrorist attacks has been on a healthy decline since 2014.
17,000 or so attacks in 2014.
There's a drop-off going that is very considerable.
But in this country...
That trend is reversed.
In 2015, there were less than 40 such incidents.
In 2016 and 2017, the years when Trump's rhetoric has shifted the Overton window that dictates what sort of things are acceptable public speech, we see that number jump to 64 and 65 in those years, respectively.
So while the rest of the world is, even the Middle East, the numbers are going down.
We see ours going way up, and the share of them being right-wing extremists going way up with it.
So, I mean, the reality of what Alex wants to talk about just isn't true, and that's why he has to call all of this false.
He has to call all of this fake, or else you have to wrestle with the idea that, like, maybe we're doing this.
Maybe this is something that we're responsible for.
But if you do that, if Alex and Fox News and fucking Lou Dobbs or whoever, if they ever actually say, maybe what we're doing is inciting violence, their ratings are going to go down, right?
Isn't that their big issue?
Like, the biggest problem they have is not, are we causing the needless deaths of people?
It's, well, look at how popular we are now that we're calling for violence.
I'm so glad that I'm not in the place, because this is something that I would imagine that every, like, human Fox News employee has to wrestle with on a daily basis of, like, I'm part of the evil here.
So, Alex has been saying that, like, I've been predicting this, and he's been touting that he has tons of proof, tons of articles to make his own proof, and here is that.
Do you have all those clips where you predicted the summer of rage?
Alex, do you have all those clips where you predicted that the dollar was about to be completely devalued and everyone should buy gold?
If you say things repeatedly and keep varying up what you're predicting, eventually something, you're going to have a clip where you're like, ha ha, I was right!
So, I mean, yes, he probably did say it like two weeks before the election.
But I also guarantee there's a clip where he says...
This isn't proving anything except that he keeps saying this.
None of it depicts reality at all.
At no point in any of those articles or in anything that he says does he actually prove in any way that the media is planning to false flag themselves.
He just keeps saying it and then uses those articles that he and his team himself have produced as evidence that I got it right.
I got it right because this happened.
The way that he likes to try and present this, the argument that he tries to make about this, is that the reason that he's able to make these predictions throughout August and all this, is because it's like when you see commercials for the McRib.
So he sees the media say that his rhetoric is dangerous, and that means to him, I know that that means they're going to false flag themselves to blame me.
So he writes all these articles, and then, you know, when an attack happens...
But what I would rather relate it to, I would like to talk about Alex's actions as opposed to the media.
Because personally, I believe the media is pretty accurately warning people about the consequences of dehumanizing and violent, dangerous rhetoric.
So when I look at Alex's behavior of him consistently saying the media is going to false flag themselves, writing article after article about it, It's less like an advertisement.
And what it is, is it seems more like the PR department at a company that knows they're about to get caught for something.
So what we're going to do is preemptively put a report out about how the watchdog group isn't, they're not credible.
They have been taking money from interests that want to take us down, because then when that report comes out about the polluting that they were actually doing, you have that to fall back on.
That groundwork has been laid before the story comes out, and you'd be like, oh no, look, we're not responding to this story.
We're responding to, like, we know that they're dirty.
Killed three people and the cops are getting on to him, but he's like a month out and he's just talking to his kids and he's like, they're going to say a lot of bad things about your daddy, but let me tell you something.
None of it's true.
I mean, I did kill those three people, but none of what they say is true.
You're going to hear a lot of things, but you don't believe any of their evidence.
You don't believe anything anybody tells you but what daddy says.
But what it all comes down to and comes back to is exactly what you're saying at the beginning of this.
That they know the end result of their actions as well.
They know, like, Alex Jones wouldn't make all of these posts and make such a big deal of talking about how the media is going to false flag themselves if he didn't have a keen awareness that...
Trump saying that the media is the enemy of the American people and me doing demon voices about Brian Stelter and talking about how he needs to fall and he wants to kill and rape your family.
He has to know that the natural end result of that, when an unhinged person hears those sorts of rhetoric, the natural end result is quite possibly someone hurting these people.
This is preemptive damage control for that.
It is not predictive.
No.
Except for the fact that he's predicting that this will happen.
But what he's doing is trying to play this game where he's like, you know, they're trying to get sympathy for themselves, trying to make themselves seem like victims and demonizing us.
That's the false flag.
You know, you got this false flag, and then the next stage of it is when they're going to reveal the person that did it, and it's going to be like us.
So I was thinking about the nature of the false flag stuff and the false flag accusations that get made and when they get made.
And one of the things I realized is that there's a real general trend among people to claim that things that would tend to make them be seen in a realistic way are actually elaborate plots against them.
And there's no better example of this than the fallout that happened after the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville.
Initially, the hard right media figures were totally fine with the rally and supported it, as they saw it as an extension.
Sure.
promote the rally.
Alex was firmly in support of the rally.
Absolutely.
unidentified
But then, the reality of the worlds that they helped facilitate became publicly visible.
Things didn't get better when it came out that the rally organizer, Jason Kessler, was at least a second-degree member of McGinnis'Proud Boys street gang.
Immediately, McGinnis went into damage control mode and alleged that Kessler wasn't really a Proud Boy and that he'd been coming to Proud Boy meetings under false pretenses.
Kessler being a Proud Boy was a false flag to associate his definitely not-white nationalist street gang with street gang-style violence perpetrated by a group of real white nationalists.
Alex would do the same thing, having Kessler on his show to try and get him to confess that the whole rally was a setup and that Kessler was actually a Democrat.
It didn't work, but Alex got the pivot that he needed to still claim that Kessler wasn't on the up-and-up with the Patriot movement, and thus he too branded the Charlottesville tragedy a globalist false flag.
The appropriate response to a situation like the one in Charlottesville is deep reflection and empathy.
Unfortunately for people like Alex and Gavin, empathy is weakness, and deep reflection leads people to realize that they are the problem.
Didn't you see Rachel Maddow going out and screaming about the...
They didn't end up talking to the shooter at that ballpark and being like, hey, you're really working for the Koch brothers trying to make liberals look bad.
Anyway, it's all nonsense, but it is interesting to me that I started to realize, and I think I've always kind of known this, but the false flag accusation really only comes out...
At least these days.
Because I don't think this was necessarily the motivation behind him being like 9-11 was fake.
I think it was just a good business opportunity.
And it's true.
These days, well, not his version, but yeah.
These days it comes out so much when it's like, okay, this can't be part of what people think about us.
Therefore, it's a false flag.
Because if they believe this about us, we can't continue to operate the way we have been.
We will not be allowed to or we'll be so obviously monsters that we have to deny the reality.
I get Alex needing to constantly say that Soros is a Nazi collaborator by taking that 60 Minutes interview and other interviews that he's done completely and wildly out of context and assert that he has Steve Pachanik on to call him a Judenrat and shit like that.
Of course, you've got to do these things.
It makes sense.
When you're demonizing your philanthropist enemy, this is a good strategy.
I understand that you've got to say these sorts of things are false flags as preemptive.
Damage control for yourself.
But I can't understand the level of shithead you have to be to combine the two.
Like, the day after...
Because on some level, Alex fucking knows this isn't a false flag.
And so, you know, I know that Soros doesn't listen to InfoWars, but the idea of being this cruel to somebody who has just received a bomb, I find it deplorable, quite frankly.
Just because X does exist doesn't mean all things are X. Right.
That is horrible thinking.
And he doesn't go much further than that in terms of trying to prove this.
His arguments are essentially false flags do exist.
It's the oldest trick in the book.
Therefore, this is a false flag.
I saw it coming.
I predicted this based on all of these articles that I wrote about this, which are really just preemptive damage control because I know that someone's going to fucking attack them eventually, and I don't want the heat.
That's all he's got.
That's all the evidence that he gives.
It's super thin.
I want to talk to you a little bit about bombings.
Because there's another talking point that Alex Jones doesn't bring up, but I've seen posted a lot by these shitheads on Twitter about, like, of course it's fake.
None of them went off.
Of course!
Obviously, if there was a bombing, they would have blown up.
And I need to address this, because whether or not Alex brings it up in what we're covering, I'm sure he'll bring it up eventually, because it's caught fire with the Twitter sphere.
And this needs to be addressed.
There are a few super important points that you need to know about making bombs.
The process of successfully bombing someone involves so many variables, along with factors completely outside of the perpetrator's control, that they're nearly impossible to pull off.
Since then, it specifically has not been the behavior of the left.
Again, if you exclude environmental terrorism and animal rights activist groups, which I don't believe are necessarily appropriate to fit under the umbrella...
Yeah, it's not like they're bombing to get healthcare.
That would be the equivalent of left-wing terrorism for Alex's right-wing terrorism.
You can find plenty of lists of bombings and terrorist acts, and you'll find that the lists are littered with disrupted plots and people who made their bombs wrong so they didn't end up detonating.
It's the exception, not the rule, that a bomb actually goes off when someone plans to bomb people.
One of the very few large-scale bombings that were successful was the Boston bombing.
Another was the string of bombings in New York and New Jersey between September 17th and 19th, 2016, which left 35 people injured.
The perpetrator of said bombings was a gun enthusiast who had previously been arrested for stabbing his brother in the leg after, quote, the victim and another brother attempted to stop him from assaulting their mother and, Left-wing terrorist.
He spent a few months in jail and later became radicalized by online jihadi materials, which is said to have been inspirational in his planning of his bombing.
Which we don't need to get into today, necessarily.
But yeah, man, it's one of those things.
And it's like, so...
The idea that none of these things went off is so foolish as an argument as to the reality of it because a number of these people had Secret Service details.
They're going to find that sort of thing immediately.
Or George Soros is a goddamn billionaire.
He has people who are working there and are going to find these things.
And even the ones that were left at people's offices, they have security guards who are trained in these sorts of things.
So if you leave a bomb somewhere where you want it to explode, It's so hard for someone not to find it and for you to get the timing right so it hurts the person that you want.
I'm going to pass and listen to others and listen to their perspective.
So I don't really have a take on Lester Holt's comments.
I'm fine.
Right.
But what I can tell you is that Lester Holt's discussion of Alex Jones' comments came after a number of things.
One of them was Alex Jones and Mike Cernovich getting on air and starting a contest where they were going to pay people to go on live TV and yell CNN is ISIS.
It was a formal contest that Alex launched promising thousands of dollars to people to equate a news network with a terrorist organization that we're presumably at war with.
In one call, he said, quote, I'm coming to gun you all down.
I'm on my way right now to gun the fucking CNN cast down.
I'm coming to kill you.
He referred to them as fake news and dropped a couple N-words for good measure.
The president of this country had previously called the fake news media the enemy of the people.
He'd frequently attacked CNN at rallies, press conferences, and on Twitter.
It's no surprise that Lester Holt would take something appearing to be a threat seriously, seeing as that's something that's happened quite a bit to him recently.
So Alex refusing to accept that sort of context, just saying like, oh, out of nowhere Lester Holt was like, I'm threatening him because I talked about get your battle rifles ready.
It seems, I mean...
The weakest critique we can always have for Alex is like, being a little unfair.
But it's a little unfair to attack and say like, oh, this is all media scripting of this same thing.
It's like, you're not taking into context the things that came before that because they make your argument look like shit.
When they come out and they say, Alex Jones says blow up and shoot the media, and Trump says kill the media, and it's not true, and they've got a history of staging crap, and they're a pack of criminals that works with radical Islam, you name it, and say MS-13 are God's children, you better believe these scumbags in the deep state haven't given up, and they don't want America to return, and they don't want our republic back, so they're crapping their filthy britches, and they're going to pull anything!
And if we can't see the giant setup to this, we're crazy.
But how evil is it for you to watch people get terrorized and then say, one, it's a false flag that they're perpetrating, and that makes them so evil and such scumbags that it's, what, dot, dot, dot, fine to bomb them.
let's say all but one of these bombs didn't go off, but one of them did and killed Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
Could he still make this argument you bet he would yeah you fucking bet he would and if you would do it with one of them going off he'd do it with all of them going off yep this is like i know that we have talked about for two years on this show all he does is normalize and excuse white violence and pretend that white uh uh Violence and terrorism don't exist.
But the level that he's going to here is profoundly dangerous.
And what it implies for the future is so fucked up.
What it implies is literally the most dangerous mentality that is possible.
Because any time now that any attack happens on people on the left, this is going to be the narrative that all of these shitheads on Twitter and Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, Lou Dobbs, that is going to be something that's going to be a card they can play.
I mean, this is the sort of next progression from accepting a lot of the conspiracy theory stuff that propped up as Trump was running, became much more normal.
And then as it got closer to the election, it became even more normal.
Then after, it just went crazy.
On a smaller level, you have the normalization in the right-wing media, especially Fox News, of this idea that Antifa and the Proud Boys, let's say, are the same thing.
You have this idea where they're pretending that Antifa is some sort of organized group.
They have that perspective as opposed to it being a loose-knit group of unorganized, small groups of people who go and counter-demonstrate against fascists.
And are willing to fight with them as opposed to a lot of other groups who would demonstrate against these people.
So you have that on that side.
And then with the Proud Boys, you have a shithead cult leader like Gavin McGinnis who screams all the time about how he wants violence and thinks that society is too weak and we should kick the shit out of each other and has a group with a regimented structure where the fourth level of it is you have to beat somebody up or get arrested for the cause.
But because that language of equivalence of the Proud Boys and Antifa are exactly the same, and in fact, Antifa's worse, and they're funded by George Soros, that sort of language about the broader picture of street fights or whatever is the first step that leads us to make this okay.
Make terrorism okay.
And, you know...
Charlottesville, president coming out and saying good people on both sides.
Because he never defines what Nazi collaborator means, which makes it so evil.
Because if he said...
He is a Nazi collaborator, and by that I mean, when he was a very young boy, he was a part of the Jewish Council, which was an organization that, oh, I should also tell you this, back then they didn't let Jewish kids go to school, and so they had to become a part of this.
It wasn't really something he chose to do.
But he was a part of this group, and they would go deliver messages to Jews around town, and then if it was a summons, and if they give this message to the person, they would end up getting taken away.
Young George Soros told his dad about these messages he was told to deliver, and his dad said, deliver those messages that you tell everybody that you give that message to that if you show up to that meeting, they are never going to come back.
You warned them.
That this is something that is not what it appears to be.
So Soros, as a young boy, went around and he delivered those messages and warned people, as his father did as well.
Saved a number of people from the Holocaust, from being taken away to camps.
And then, as a boy...
After he made that run, he was like, I am not doing this anymore.
And so he disappeared and stopped going into the Jewish council meetings that he was made to do because Jews weren't allowed to go to school in those days.
My favorite part of the Paul Revere mythology is that he was called a British collaborator the entire time.
Remember that?
Remember how when you learned in high school that the person who tells you that the evil is coming to destroy you, that person is actually collaborating with that evil.
But you understand, if he wanted to have that conversation about what does collaborator mean, is that what you mean?
Then that would be the weak, like, it would take all the power out of his declaration.
Like, he's a Nazi collaborator, and by that I have the broadest definition for it.
Because you could say that, yeah, as a kid he did make one run of these things, but ended up subverting the process that he was supposed to be a part of.
So, like, there's all this stuff, and that is the essence of what's going wrong.
There's this, like, deterioration of definition, there's a deterioration of...
Truth, of context, of all this stuff, just serving...
With what he said there, too, is like, even if it was a false flag, his argument is that CNN is trying to paint him as a poor little baby getting bombed.
We have a couple more clips, but before we do that, I want to talk a little bit about how when I was preparing the episode for today, there were a number of, like, I didn't want to talk about the present day, of course.
I don't want to put people through that.
And I think that a lot of the conversation we've been having is fairly basic.
And I'm not saying we're being stupid or anything, but it doesn't really charm me all that much to reiterate, hey, This is why he talks about false flags all the time.
This is his way of, like you very eloquently put, admitting without admitting that he knows something is really bad coming and he needs to not be on the hook for it.
So I started to rack my brain and think about, like, what are other times that we could draw analogs to?
And one of them was the Boston bombing, and listening to that, it was just a waste of an hour.
Unless we did a dedicated episode about that.
It just wasn't right.
And so, look, it's hard for me to experience the things we're experiencing together as a country right now without thinking back to April 2010.
That month was a month that was full of right-wing insanity, and thus, when I was planning out this episode, I wanted to go back and see what Alex was saying about a couple incidents that stuck out.
Imagine my surprise when I didn't find him saying anything and mostly just talking about how Oklahoma City was a false flag a bunch, because April is the anniversary.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So, there's some things I did learn, though.
And one of them is that in April 2010, I can confirm for you that Alex was pro Tea Party.
So he does end up getting on board with the Tea Party by April 2010.
He was also pro-Oath Keepers, who were very closely aligned with the Rising Tide and the Tea Party, and that's where April 2010 went in a wild direction.
On April 15, 2010, President of the Cleveland Chapter of the Oath Keepers, Matthew Fairfield, was arrested and indicted on 28 explosive charges, 25 counts of receiving stolen property, and one count of possessing criminal tools.
When the police searched his home, they found a literal napalm bomb that he had constructed, as well as child pornography.
From an article on Cleveland.com, quote, That's a tough two-hander.
A retired ATF agent said that the discovery of the homemade bomb was particularly troubling because napalm is designed to target people.
Of course, this wasn't any kind of isolated event.
The napalm bomb is obviously a huge red flag, but this guy also had a bit of an armory going.
Quote, officers seized a detonator car, detonators, two M4 assault rifles, a 12-gauge pump-action shotgun, a.22-caliber bolt-action rifle, and two semi-automatic handguns from the home.
This was a guy who was arrested on 28 explosives charges, and he built a napalm bomb, among other bombs.
Generally speaking, you do not build bombs for recreation.
They're intended to be used.
A bomb just sitting around is a bomb that is not serving its only purpose.
So, I went back and listened to episodes around the time of Fairfield's arrest, and there was an article that came out a couple days after his arrest, so I checked that day, too, to see if, like, maybe Alex missed the news when it happened.
And I expected Alex to say it was a false flag, and there was an attempt to besmirch the good name of the Oath Keepers.
But what I found instead was him not bringing up the story at all.
So here was the president of the Oath Keepers chapter in a city of a population over 2 million people being arrested for building a bomb that was meant to target people with napalm.
And Alex doesn't talk about it at all.
It doesn't come up in the least.
That sucks.
Because I kind of wish that Alex had claimed it was a false flag meant to make the Oath Keepers look bad, because then I could have told you all about Darren Hough, the Tennessee Oath Keeper who got arrested on April 30th, 2010, for planning an armed takeover of Madisonville, Tennessee's courthouse, where he would assert control, then put everyone under citizen's arrest.
I could tell you about how he had 300 rounds of ammo and an AK-47 as well as a handgun, because, quote, I've got my.45 because ain't no government official gonna go peacefully.
I can tell you about how Huff only went to take over that town because they were hosting a trial for a sovereign citizen weirdo named Walter Francis Fitzpatrick who was being tried for trying to make a citizen's arrest on the foreman of a grand jury that he had nothing to do with, which led to him being charged with inciting a riot and disrupting an official public meeting.
I can tell you that Huff was under surveillance the entire time he was traveling from his home in Georgia to Madisonville because he bragged to a bank employee that he and some militia buddies were going to take over Madisonville.
I could tell you about how the city of Madisonville surreptitiously rescheduled Fitzpatrick's hearing and told courthouse employees to stay home that day, so Huff and his militia buddies ended up showing up to an empty courthouse under total surveillance.
I could tell you about countless other very serious, but sometimes a little bit goofy, like that last one, plots that have been planned or carried out by right-wing groups in this country.
Just because something doesn't go off as planned doesn't mean that it's fake, which is an important distinction.
And secondarily, there is a ton of Oathkeeper-related right-wing violence and terrorism that Alex just doesn't even talk about.
He doesn't even make the effort to say it's a false flag.
So earlier when you were bringing up this idea of like, what does he call a false flag?
And you were suggesting all of the things that you could pin on the right are false flags.
Often he just doesn't talk about it.
And this one, like this dude, this initial dude here, this guy, Matthew Fairfield, this is a one-to-one parallel here.
He was a guy who was making multiple bombs, one of them a napalm bomb.
I get it mixed up because there was another story about another guy from the Oath Keepers who may or may not have had a stolen grenade launcher that he claimed...
He's essentially convinced or seduced all of the right-wing media to his way of being, which is to normalize white violence and white terrorism, to the point now where we have an entire political party and their propaganda organs that are in service of, man, if any white guys do anything, it's fake.
I don't think that anybody should take him saying that to be evidence that it's going to happen.
But I would say that Alex thinks it's going to happen.
You can clearly see that from that clip.
He thinks that shit, this is going to escalate.
And he knows that because he knows what his fans are like.
That's why he runs away from them on the street.
That's why he's...
He knows.
He doesn't want to go into the Trump rally because there's too many Trump people in there.
He knows that.
That's why he yells at a piece of shit and calls it Beto outside instead of actually engaging and being a part of the thing that he's created.
He knows.
He knows that there are dangerous people on that side, and statistics back that up.
And there's no reason why he would make that prediction and say it's going to be a false flag if he didn't have some reason to believe this is probably going to happen and we need damage control.
I'm sure there are fingerprints somewhere and this investigation is going to happen and it's going to...
More facts will come out and we'll be able to discuss them more accurately as that happens.
But, at the same time, if you're the person who did it and you see an entire political party working their ass off in order to present it as if you weren't doing the thing that you did...
I don't know what other message that sends to would-be bombers.
It sends a message of, hey, if you do this, we're going to bat for you.
Even if you don't get caught, we're going to do our best to make sure that people think it was this shadowy cabal of definitely not Jews.
So, I mean, the world that we're entering is super fucked up and dangerous.
If we don't step up and the media doesn't step up, I know some people are doing a good job about it.
Don't get me wrong.
I'm not saying everybody sucks.
But people need to step up and talk about it in these terms.
They're normalizing terrorism.
It's not a situation of, hey, what's this quirky false flag hashtag that's going around?
It's not that.
It is, this is, intentionally or not, the right-wing seeking to normalize and make okay white terrorism.
Now, granted, I'm saying that with no idea if the person who's doing this is white.
Well, there's that, but the reason that I'm putting that piece into the equation is because look at the M.O. and past history of the people.
Who are doing this?
In the media, there are people like Alex Jones, like Tucker Carlson, like Lou Dobbs, like Rush Limbaugh.
These are people who have made careers out of justifying white crimes and minimizing the effect on their victims.
These are the people who...
I mean, Tucker Carlson did fine for himself on Crossfire, but he wasn't making nearly the amount of money he is now being just a lapdog who is justifying white supremacy on a nightly basis.
I'm saying that they're doing this in an effort to normalize white terrorism because of the people in the media who are doing it.
Their behavior is in line with past instances of white terrorism, not necessarily that the perpetrator, once they're caught, is white.
I just need to make that clear, lest it seem like I'm saying that.
When I accept there's an entire world out there of possibilities of who this person or persons are.
But I imagine being in that production meeting before Tucker Carlson's show, and there are a bunch of producers in there all talking about what it is we should say.
And the consensus, was there even anybody who was like, maybe we're...
I'm not saying that they all suck and they're all awful or anything like that, but I find it difficult to imagine people there who haven't quit already.
It's hard for me to imagine that.
unidentified
I don't know that to be true, but it's very hard to imagine.
I'm not trying to be too fatalistic or too, like, hey, everyone freak out, but, like, if we are not more careful about how we allow stories to be told, how we allow the media to behave, and I'm not saying, like, let's put stringent rules on the media, but, like...
People who are writing these stories, people who are writing the headlines of these articles, need to be substantially more careful.
They need to be more aware of what's actually going on and what the intention and effect of this right-wing propaganda is.
It's incredibly difficult, and I do not...
I am not in any way jealous of their position.
I couldn't do it.
So I'm not saying...
I'm not wagging the finger, like...
I could do your job or anything like that.
I couldn't.
But I also didn't go get a journalism degree.
So you guys put yourself in this position because you studied journalism and now have made a career out of being journalists.
So we, the public, trust you to know how to do journalism.
And we trust you...
To adapt to the times that we're in and not fall into the traps of these right-wing propagandists that will lead us all down the road to hell where any attack on anybody on the left is seen as fake.
Dan, everyone listens to this show expecting optimism about the future.
We have put together a long track record of being very positive about the direction we're going, and respecting everybody's right to an opinion, and what else?