Today, Dan and Jordan discuss the March 11th and 12th, 2009 episodes of The Alex Jones Show. These are an epic couple days in Occupied Texas, as Alex finally gets around to releasing The Obama Deception (or does he?). As if that wasn't enough, he spends a lot of time explaining how he owns "his women," then receives a mysterious classified document that will become a huge part of his mythology moving forward.
No, when I was sick I played a bit and like is always the case whenever I play I just end up running around gathering things and then trying to build my house.
I'd like to say, Jordan, today I'd like to start things off by thanking somebody who bumped their pledge up a little bit, and we appreciate it also very much.
So, I put up a poll on our Facebook group, Go Home and Tell Your Mother You're Brilliant, where the buwonks out there get to vote on what documentary we're going to break down.
I mean, he wrote, like, The Naked Capitalist and The Naked Communist, and they're, like, books that are really, really inspirational for Alex's worldview and all that.
Bet you that probably both of these men have been seeing psychiatrists or psychologists, the mass shooting in Alabama last night, the mass shooting killing 16 in Germany that just ended with the gunman conveniently being killed.
And then even in that declaration, he's qualifying it to say, I bet they maybe saw a psychologist, which, I mean, that's the safest bet in the world, is that someone who ends up going on a violent streak probably had some sort of an issue that they may have tried to seek out.
Hold on to that level of sort of deductive reasoning, because it's going to come in real handy towards the end of this episode.
That sort of real shoddy attempt at a syllogism is going to come into play.
All right.
So...
This sort of rhetoric is especially dangerous because Alex is talking about how these people are mentally ill and they're all wacky, that sort of thing.
And it would be bad enough if he was just trying to other them or create some sort of societal shame about mental health.
That would be bad enough on its own.
But the reason that it's even worse is he says things like this.
The fact that this nation is a mix of good, hard-working, intelligent, dynamic, inventive, people full of ingenuity, but there's also a lot of spoiled, rotten, mentally ill scum hopped up on every different type of Prozac, hopped up on illegal drugs, and that's all the more reason that we should all have firearms.
I mean, I have one right here.
In my studio, because some nut comes around here, I'm not going to get down on my knees and say, please, please don't blow my brains out.
I'm going to defend myself, like my forefathers did.
Now, more children die in an average year of football accidents, you can pull those numbers up, but a lot of mainstream articles have written about that over the years, than die in shootings.
There is a crime that's being committed against people in mass shootings that doesn't exist, generally speaking, with drownings, and a lot of the times with car accidents, although drunk driving is, you know, that's an issue.
I just think that whenever you use those sort of statistics to minimize the idea of mass shootings, you're like, why are you talking about limiting access to guns when...
People die in drownings more.
It's like, that's stupid because one of those things you can't do to people in a school.
I don't know.
Maybe you could, at gunpoint, if the school has a pool.
So, anyway, the shootings that he's talking about, he's going to get back into them a little bit later, and I'll discuss the realities of them at that point.
But just for now, that logic about guns is just the stupidest shit.
So, on a recent episode from the past that we were going over, Alex did that fun pageant on air about, fuck it!
This sort of ranting that Alex is jumping off into, and trust me, it goes some really crazy places, is his way of not having to feel anything, I think.
It's his way of turning this into some sort of, like, hey, it's really about the New World Order and shit like that, as opposed to it being, like, a real human tragedy that you should feel something about when you hear.
I love how his mind works, at least at this point in history, where he's like, I don't really have much more to say about this shooting, but man, I like to talk about that chimp.
What?
Alright, that chimp was up on all these Prozac drugs.
You know, my uncle, my great uncle.
Boy, he was a crazy dude.
He was involved in getting rodeo dudes to box chimpanzees.
Boy, could those chimps fight.
unidentified
And now the government wants to make it illegal to own monkeys.
That to me is like, whenever you talk about Alex Jones being the biggest monster in the world now, which he is, he was still a bad dude back then, but this is what I mourn the loss of.
Stuff like that.
My uncle was a fucking monkey fighter.
I love that.
Because he's got four fucking hours to fill.
And if he talks about the reality of these shootings, it undermines a lot of the narratives that he wants to play.
So, this Alabama shooting, the shooting was perpetrated by a guy named Michael McClendon, who was a 29-year-old white dude, who, despite what Alex is reporting, was not married and did not have kids.
He lived at home with his mother.
He had difficulty finding work.
He failed to complete basic training when he tried to enter the services, and he found himself in a really bad position in the world.
When he did shoot his mom and set fire to the house, what he then did is went and killed most of his mom's side of the family.
He ended up doing that, and he left a note behind explaining his actions.
Quote, he wrote that he wanted people to pay for making his mother and him suffer.
He went on to write, quote, Mama was very sick, had lung cancer, I think, so I put her out of her misery.
I'm sorry, but Mama had suffered enough, and so have I. Some of the people who made us suffer will pay.
After everything was said and done, his mother received an autopsy that did not support his claim that she was sick, and she definitely didn't have cancer.
There are indications that he was depressed, but no indications that he was receiving treatment.
In the end, what it is is probably just a down-on-his-luck, very deluded, mentally ill person who had imagined that his mom was sick.
He wasn't getting the support he needed from his mom, who was probably, you know...
Might take it a hundred times if you don't have a bad trip.
But that one time, Mike Nelson ought to get him in here.
Derek Einkoff, they were both EMTs previously.
Mike in San Marcos, San Antonio, and Derek down in Houston.
And Derek had to quit because, you know, the last time he said he went to some house and there's these drug dealers and left cocaine out and the 18-month-old toddler had eaten a bunch of it and the baby was blue down on the ground and he had to quit.
But the issue is they both went to calls with PCP heads.
Just like a chimpanzee, the people's ears, their noses, their faces would be torn off.
There'd be some guy on PCP out at a park, in both cases, and somebody'd mess with him.
And the PCP person, in both cases, little guys, would just tear the person's face off.
He's just trying to couple the association in his listeners'minds of the effects of PCP are the same as the effects of Prozac.
They're trying to give you that because then you're going to end up like these PCP heads That's the level of logic that's going on here.
This is insanity.
Like, I understand the idea of, like, someone being cautious about overprescription of drugs, something like that.
There are very legitimate arguments to make about how, like, you know, pharma is a big business and people get put on drugs a lot of the time that are superfluous to their conditions.
Drug reps...
are often insidious in their influence, trying to get doctors to prescribe things that maybe people don't need or kind of need, but could get similar effects through exercise or something like that.
I understand that.
That conversation is well worth having.
But this one isn't.
This one is just an outright demonization of the idea of getting mental health services and the idea that some people do need medication in order to help them live productive, decent lives.
And that is not a slight on them or a shame in any way.
because like I've had family members who've taken things that are like well it worked for the symptoms but caused like massive weight gain yeah or something like that yeah well it's a shame but that's something that's going to drastically affect your life you got to try something else exactly Yeah.
And in very small numbers and very minute portions of the population, you can have severe side effects.
And they aren't like being on PCP.
And it's not the same as you take it and you're fine and then one day you have a bad trip on your Prozac or whatever.
But some people can have incredibly negative reactions based on their individual chemistry, just the unique fingerprints of our brain, sometimes don't work with X, Y, or Z drug.
And demonizing that drug because of the small amount of negative reactions that happen to it is absurd.
That is just stupid, and it's regressive to the point of just deny science.
I don't want to say anything that sounds positive, but the precision that's required in order to carry out a massive mass shooting, I don't think you could do that on PCP.
I think that you could try and punch your way through a school or something like that, but you wouldn't have the time.
So with the German shooting, this is a guy who shot up a school.
His name was Tim Kretschmere.
He wasn't on psychotropic medication, or at least there's no indication that he was from anything I can find.
He was put into inpatient treatment briefly, but failed to continue outpatient treatment when he was released, which was a condition of him getting out of this hospital.
Yeah.
Which kind of falls in line with the picture that's painted of his parents of being kind of delusional and in denial about their son having any sort of default.
Almost it appears that they saw him as an extension of themselves.
Like he got bad grades in school and was unable to find an apprenticeship and his parents were in deep denial about that.
He was on a, I believe it was on a tennis team and people said that he was very difficult to work with and was hard to be on a team with.
And his parents just...
behavioral issues growing up.
So there is a pattern that sort of emerges with his life and the idea that this therapist is like, "I told them about his violent urges, which is the most I could do legally." And they're like, "Nope, nah, no one said anything." And he wasn't even in psychiatric care or psychological treatment at all.
And also no one with government intelligence gave him the gun.
But he was a good citizen, for the most part, in as much as he was a part of a shooting club, a recreational shooting club.
So he had all these guns.
His son stole one, and in the aftermath, there was an investigation, and they found that he was in breach of German laws in terms of, if you own guns, you have to properly lock them up.
And he didn't lock them up properly, so he got in trouble.
He had to go to court, and he was found guilty.
to this school shooting, which is appropriate to some extent.
He didn't get that drastic of a sentence, which I think is also appropriate.
I think that it's awful to be the person who has given access to this website.
weapon that killed a lot of people.
Yeah.
unidentified
But at the same time, I don't think you should treat that like he actually did the actual crime.
The people came around and they found that he had, one of his guns had been taken and used in this crime, and he immediately offered to relinquish his right to own guns.
Yeah.
unidentified
So even all those 20 guns that he used for this sporting hobby of his, he was like, oh, absolutely, here, you guys, I'm not going to own guns anymore.
Yeah, so that story Alex is pitching about this guy that he was on psychiatric medication and that someone in the government gave him a gun, all of that is not true.
He's reporting willy-nilly and just saying what he wants to be the case, which I'm sure later he will say is the case, but it's not the case.
But that's what he believes, and that's why he's so vociferous about it.
I don't know, maybe there's other reasons too.
He just really fucking loves a gun.
But this gets a little bit worse.
This attack on mental health, as it were.
Because Alex gets a call from a guy named Jack McLamb during the middle of this call.
We've talked about him before.
He's a big old shithead.
You can find us talking about him in a past episode.
But on this episode, he lives up to that classification with this stupid, stupid fear-mongering about therapy.
unidentified
Obama Nation, our phony president.
He hates guns.
He's a communist.
He wants all the guns out of the hands of the people.
And so our military intel told us that we would see more of these mind-control assassins going in and shooting up their families, killing their families and killing children and killing masses of people.
And that's exactly what's happening now, brother.
So you're right on target.
And I just wanted to tell the people that we have here...
At our two police and military associations, that issue that explains government's five easy steps to creating a mind control assassin out of anyone, even you, if you go into your psychologist or psychiatrist and they put you under hypnosis, the government can tell them to make you a mind control assassin and it only takes an hour for them to put a key in your brain.
I mean, why would you ever go to therapy if you believe that?
Like, why would you ever get help?
If you believe that there's a possibility that the government is going to tell your therapist to put a key in your brain within an hour that can turn you into a mind-control assassin that only exists because Obama wants everybody's guns and he's a communist and wants to create an oppressive state, if you're feeling depressed, you have nothing to help you.
He gets a call from a guy and this dude brings up a news story that Alex will later report as truth based on the fact that this caller is bringing it to his attention.
Which is a problem because this caller is a fucking idiot and might as well be named shoe on head.
So in that clip, Alex, without signing off on this, is giving the implication that, yeah, the fact that I haven't heard of this means that it's probably real.
This guy saying that a couple of American Legion offices or buildings in Montana have been blown up.
Second, if he is admitting that in the 60s and 70s there were all these bombings happening all over the place, what, Dan, and who do you think was perpetrating those bombings?
But yeah, so this Montana situation is real fucked up because Alex will later in this episode repeat this because he's gone and Googled a few things and he's found a headline that works for him.
And so he reports back basically the same story that this caller has pitched to him, which is that these American Legion halls have been blown up in Montana.
The incident in Bozeman was technically an explosion, but it was caused by a failure in the gas main that some people have theorized was set off by a minor earthquake nearby.
The incident in Whitehall, on the other hand, was not an explosion.
It was a fire that engulfed a few businesses caused by a faulty refrigeration unit.
Neither were suspicious at all.
The one in Whitehall was thoroughly investigated.
They found the source of the fire.
They were only suspicious as it relates to whether or not the businesses or the gas mains were abandoned.
Also, plenty of media covered these things.
They're deeply traumatic to the economies of those towns.
And the blast in Bozeman killed one woman.
So they were pretty serious events.
You can find news stories from local media and stuff like that.
There's just not really that much need for the national media to cover a gas main explosion.
Right.
And the New York Times did cover it like a couple days later, like a week later or something like that, but it's not of immediate concern necessarily until all the facts are out and all that.
These weren't bombings.
This is just ludicrous bullshit that Alex is allowing his callers to steer him into.
I don't know how to respond to somebody who, even if you tell them the reality of it, they're going to say, it's a cover-up.
Probably.
Because they didn't stage it, because it was an actual terrorist act, they can't tell you the truth of it, so they hire all these fancy scientists to lie to you, Dan.
So the issue here is that these shootings took place in multiple cities, very small cities in Alabama.
They have very limited law enforcement capability in their counties and that sort of thing.
So the response to it, some of these people from Fort Rucker said, The extent to which they helped out was very limited, but also they did get in trouble.
From an article in the Military.com from October 20th.
So this is a bit after the fact.
This is October 20th, 2009.
An Army investigation found that soldiers should not have been sent to man traffic stops in a small Alabama town after 11 people were killed in March during a shooting spree.
An Army report released to the Associated Press on Monday in response to a FOIA request said the decision to dispatch military police to Sampson from nearby Fort Rucker broke the law.
But an Army spokesman said no charges have been filed.
As a result of the findings, the Army took administrative action against at least one person.
So they found that it was a breach of the Posse Comitatus Act, which is exactly what Alex would like them to...
Bring up, which they do.
This is all handled very appropriately.
So what they found was that the officer who made the decision to send the soldiers thought he had the authority based on his experience with responses to Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Andrew.
According to the report, the officer's, quote, intent was to be a good army neighbor and help local civilian authorities facing a difficult, unique tragedy affecting the local community.
There were apparently no adverse collateral effects to the support provided, but it's still inappropriate.
He gets in touch with this guy named Colonel Weil, and the guy ends up actually calling into the show and talking to Alex, which never goes well for people who talk to Alex.
He ends up just, Alex is trying to do gotcha questions about like, when you're out there, you're out there trying to police people.
You're just trying, it's trying to, you're trying to insinuate yourself into the police force with your military shit.
And he's very polite in his responses.
And in this clip, Alex tries to nail him down about the idea that they were policing citizens.
And I think that Colonel Weill has a good answer, but at the same time...
You know, proof of the pudding is in the eating.
And the fact that their investigation found that they had breached the Posse Comitatus Act means that his interpretation is not what the Army decided was the case.
But I do believe him.
I believe Colonel Weill in terms of what he's saying here.
I don't know if the suspicion of, like, you'd deface the morgue or something like that, I don't know if that's a fear you have, but you do have to secure those perimeters and stuff like that, because even the bodies in that immediate time are still, there's evidence and what have you.
If your community, all they have is like Boss Hogg and his two deputies, maybe just anybody with any kind of authority should just be like, hey, don't go there.
But I also see the logistic argument, which is sort of more rational, I think.
Yeah.
Alex's principal side relies on the idea of, like, this is a slippery slope, and if you allow this, then they'll be next, they'll be pulling over your cars.
That's what USA Today and CNN, Fox have called him.
Incredible predictions.
He's a big part of the Obama deception that comes out in the next few days at prisonplanet.tv.
You can order the DVD right now at infowars.com.
You need to mail Gerald Cilente, one of those.
But this just broke.
I just showed you the earlier terror training manual saying those that talk about the Constitution are terrorists and are a danger to police, those that are in Second Amendment groups.
Here is the MIAC Strategic Report, and this is 220-09, the modern militia movement, and they mix in here people that believe there's nine FEMA regions, people that believe there's a Napa Superhighway, and they show the official Napa Superhighway map the government put out.
Doesn't exist.
Those that don't want RFID chips being planted with them, and they mix it in then with white supremacists and others, and they say, we want you to understand the terrorist...
Symbols, it's don't tread on me flag of the founding fathers.
But this is what Alex will, in the future, call the MIAC report.
It's a very, very big piece of his mythology.
This is a gigantic, gigantic piece.
Of all of his arguments about how the government is trying to target people like him.
And it is the stupidest argument possible.
We're going to go over all of it, much like Alex says he's going to go over all of it.
He doesn't.
But we'll go over all of it.
But there's something that's very interesting here.
In history, when Alex has talked about secret stuff and people contacting him...
He never really gets into specifics.
He never talks about the names of documents.
He just says, we have white papers, we got these secret documents.
This is one of the only instances that I can think of where he's saying the name of the report, which leads me to believe it might be one of the only instances of people actually sending him something.
Now, I don't know if that means that at the same time that someone sent it to Alex, they also sent it to WikiLeaks, and WikiLeaks had a longer process of due diligence, trying to confirm the providence of it.
I'll give you a little bit of a primer on this MIAC report, because you can find it.
And it's only eight pages.
Not that hard to read.
So what it is, is the law enforcement community came together, and they put out these reports from time to time just about things that should be on law enforcement's radar.
And this one is about the modern militia movement.
It's called...
The modern militia movement.
It goes into...
It starts by discussing the roots of the militia movement in America, which started in the 1980s and peaked in 1996, but is seeing a resurgence in 2009, which they very astutely...
Now, here's a really fun thing from the second paragraph of this study.
Or this...
This paper.
They're really perceptive.
Reading this and knowing what we know now, nine years later, it's like, oh man, this really bums me out.
Some people saw this coming.
Some people saw the alt-right and all of these white nationalist sort of bubblings coming.
So here from the second paragraph, quote, academics contend that female and minority empowerment in the 1970s and 1960s caused a blow to white males'sense of empowerment.
This combined with a sense of defeat from the Vietnam War, increased levels of immigration and unemployment spawned a paramilitary culture.
This caught on in the 1980s with injects such as Tom Clancy novels, Soldier of Fortune magazine, and movies such as Rambo that glorified combat.
This culture glorified white males and portrayed them as morally upright heroes who were mentally and Proud Boys!
There is a lot to that.
It goes on to discuss how, during this time frame, many individuals and organizations began to concoct conspiracy theories to explain their misfortunes.
These theories varied, but almost always involved the globalist dictatorship, the New World Order, which conspired to exploit the working-class citizens.
United Nations troops were thought to already be operating in the United States in support of the New World Order.
Much of this rhetoric would become anti-Semitic, claiming that the Jews controlled the monetary system and media, So this is all just descriptive and, bad news, accurate.
They discuss how in the early 90s, incidents like Ruby Ridge, Waco, and the Oklahoma City bombing were firmly catalyzing events for that community.
And it led to radicalization, and it led to a resurgence of different militia organizations and increased militia activity.
It goes on to list tons and tons of reasons why people should be pretty afraid about this trend.
Such as November 9, 1995, Oklahoma constitutional militia members are arrested as they plan to bomb the Southern Poverty Law Center, gay bars, and abortion clinics.
A drum of ammonium nitrate and fuel oil is found behind the IRS building in Reno, Nevada.
The device failed to explode.
An anti-government tax protester is later arrested for the incident.
January 18, 1996.
A member of the Aryan Republican Army is arrested in Ohio after a shootout with the FBI.
The ARA was also associated with 22 bank robberies between 1994 and 1996.
So, I mean, it just goes on and on.
July 27th, 1996.
A bomb is detonated at the Atlanta Olympic Park, killing one person and injuring 100.
Eric Robert Rudolph is later arrested and linked to other bombings at abortion clinics and a gay bar.
October 11th, 1996.
Seven members of the Mountaineer Militia were arrested for plotting to blow up the FBI Fingerprint Record Center in West Virginia.
You know, you get the sense, you see all these, you know, they're...
They're not trying to paint an unfair picture in this report.
So suffice it to say, this is a descriptor of the movement in the 90s and then the resurgence that they're seeing here, where you see incidents like...
On June 29, 2007, six members of the Alabama Free Militia are arrested on weapons and explosive charges.
An ATF agent will go on to testify that five of the men were planning an attack on Mexicans in a town near Birmingham.
And then, so what Alex is talking about there, about the idea that they're, you know, they're tying in these, like, the North American Union and, you know, this map and all this.
What they do is they explain commonalities that they found from studying militias.
And they point out that a number of them are motivated by certain things.
They don't say...
That believing there's a North American Union means that you're a part of a violent militia.
They're saying that a lot of these militias also have this belief.
That's a very important distinction.
If you read this, and you know how to read, you will see just that.
That these are things that militias that carry out attacks, like described in the beginning of this report, they may hold these beliefs.
Not...
That holding these beliefs makes you suspected to be a member of one of those groups.
And I'm excited to read this MIAC report and not see that.
Because you could plausibly believe that.
Yeah.
If you don't read the stuff that Alex says, I could see a world where the law enforcement put out a report that was like, A lot of these dickholes believe this.
So if you see someone who believes this, they're probably one of those dickholes.
So they're teaching police as the New York Times, the Washington Post, and now it's world government, a bank of the world, Newsweek time, headlines like in the Times of London, and now for world government where they say we kept it secret for your own good.
In this training manual, people have police everywhere in the country.
It has a don't tread on me flag.
It shows America freedom to fascism and the film Zeitgeist in it.
We just showed that, and shows it next to the Turner Diaries, which was a white supremacist thing about killing police.
No, I think from the way he's phrased that, what he's saying is that, for a long time, I thought people who did this were crazy, and now I'm starting to think, maybe they had the smallest kernel of a point.
They're all working in concert, and they don't give a fuck about borders.
Right.
unidentified
So the idea that the problems that we face as we move into the future being international, it would make sense that we have some sort of an international...
He goes on to talk about how, like, Obama now coming into office, it seems like he is someone who is much more interested in international cooperation.
He goes on to bring up this thing, the Managing Global Insecurity Project.
John Podesta was on the advisory board of this group, and they were pushing for UN working on counterterrorism, they were working for a legally binding climate change agreement, and working to strengthen the UN peacekeeping forces.
So he's using that as kind of like, okay, Obama is associated with John Podesta.
He is someone who is into working with the UN to strengthen their positions.
He's like, well, maybe these are indications that the world is becoming more amenable to that.
The bad reason is the lack of will and determination on the part of national political leaders who, while they might like to talk about a planet in peril, are ultimately still much more focused on their next election.
This and now for a world government article ends with, quote, The world's most pressing political problems may indeed be international in nature, but the average citizen's political identity remains stubbornly local.
Until someone cracks this problem, that plan for a world government may have to stay locked away in a safe at the UN.
So even in this article, if you actually read it, just because the title is And Now for World Government, it's not announcing a world government in the way that Alex thinks it is.
So he likes to play this game where he's like, I'm reading between the lines.
unidentified
This author is really saying that the world government is here, but maybe the text says it isn't.
But it's like, you know, you can't use that argument.
This author clearly doesn't have some subversive pro-world government opinion.
And his article is...
The trend in the world seems to be heading in the direction that this is plausible, but unfortunately, because the problems that we face are international in nature, and people aren't interested in that, that's not going to happen.
His article says it's not going to happen!
So anyway, that's just a little slight turn in the road.
And we're going to start seeing riots in major cities that rival way surpass, actually, those that we saw back in the 1960s when cities were being burnt down.
You're going to start seeing the same thing happen in the United States.
We're forecasting by this summer.
And we're saying to people, you better prepare for the war.
This is unclassified, law enforcement sensitive, and they say we'll go after anybody that covers this.
This is the First Amendment.
This is America.
This is what the police and military are being trained in.
It says here, North American Union conspiracy theorists claim the Union would link Canada, the United States, and Mexico.
The NAU would unify its monetary system and trade the dollar for the Amero, associated with the theory is concerned over Napa Superhighway, which would fast-trap between the three nations.
And it goes on to mix it in with white supremacists.
Well, there's the Wall Street Journal Market Watch.
How realistic is a North American currency?
It says uniting U.S., Canada, Mexico money could result from crisis.
And then they admit what we read out of the Robert Passer CFR public documents.
Judicial Watch sued.
And this is put out by Simon& Schuster in books now.
And then his other proof that it's not crazy that the North American Union is being put together is this article is how realistic is a North American currency here from January 28, 2009 written by a guy named Todd Harrison.
Again, this is an instance of an article with a title that does not...
He's talking about the idea that there is a financial crisis that's going on.
An idea is combining...
The three countries, because there are natural resources to be used in Canada, there's ingenuity, in quotes, with America, and there's cheap labor in Mexico.
So the three coming together as one unit might be competitive on a global level.
So he discusses that possibility, gets into some ideas, and then if you look at the end of this article once again, quote, This particular path isn't something one would wish for, but the cumulative imbalances that steadily built our finance-based economy must be resolved one way or another.
Therein lies the critical crossroads we together face as our wary world attempts to find its way.
So again, Alex is taking that and a Jerome Corsi book to try and prove that the North American Union, it's not a conspiracy theory, it's fucking real.
And he's doing that because the North American Union and the NAFTA superhighway that we covered in our Endgame coverage, Ad Nauseam, are listed in that MIAC document about conspiracies that people in these militias believe in.
So, uh, Alex has to be like, that's not a conspiracy, that's totally real.
So it's not that, like, this report, even if you look at the entirety of it, and you say, oh, all of this describes me to a T, that's still not saying that you are a member of one of those militias.
If he saw some sort of like a document somehow portraying, you know, like, oh, Radical Muslim groups all use this, or many of them use this iconography and stuff like that.
He'd be like, thank God someone's putting out warnings.
So, without the fanfare that he probably would have loved, he comes on air and very groggily says, it's out, I put it out last night while I was on air with Jason Barber's.
And they'll get in their car real fast and slam the door, and you're there unloading the vegetables in the back of your car, looking at her going, okay, lady, believe me.
When you're alone in a parking lot and some strange person comes over, you probably expect at least some sort of unwelcome interaction or something, you know, that could turn bad if you turn them down.
I don't know how they take your survival instinct out of you and how they teach you feminism is being cowardly and scared and shaking with five locks on your door, unempowered.
Don't let me tell you what real feminism is.
It's a woman with a submachine gun.
It's a woman that if you go after, she's going to karate chop you in the neck.
If you tackle her, she's going to bite you.
She's going to scratch your eyes out if she didn't get the gun in your face.
I mean, this is sick.
They've turned the men into gelded, chicken-necked, cowardly people, and they've turned the women into chicken-necked cowards.
Right now, over and over and over again, the more these idiots talk about Kavanaugh, the more they talk about this, they're like, oh, they're just taking men's ability, like, they're just cutting our balls off.
We're not, what, we're not allowed to dominate people anymore?
Like, just turn it.
Just turn it around for one second.
Like, they, you're, I'm able to consider the possibility of what you're saying.
And then dismiss it.
And they are not able to consider the possibility of what anybody else is saying.
People start commenting on the Infowars.com story.
Oh, I don't believe this.
I want this confirmed.
Hey, jackasses, and I'm sorry to use that term, but you really need to get your head out of the sand.
Call the phone number.
We did.
They've refused to come on.
We have two senior state police officers' names, and they admit they issued this.
It's confirmed, and we just wrote up the blurb, their names, what they told us.
It's being sent to Paul Watson, who's doing a story on it.
So, yes, it's real.
It's true.
Ron Paul, libertarians, Bob Barr supporters, Constitutional Party supporters, you are terrorists that want to kill police, is basically what this says.
This is ludicrous that Alex Jones is getting on air and...
Suggesting to his very suggestible audience, who don't like to read things, that this report is saying that if you support Ron Paul, you're a terrorist and you want to kill cops.
So this next clip, he misunderstands the MIAC report even more and brings up some of his old rhetoric that I think is important to touch on for a second in order to bolster his misunderstanding of the MIAC.
We put this out with other FBI training manuals and FBI training flyers to police saying look out for constitutionalists and those that make frequent references to the U.S. Constitution and gun owners and they say right next to that they want to kill cops, look out.
That is something that is a threat to police, because police have been attacked and killed by sovereign citizens who don't respect their authority during traffic stops.
So Alex bringing that up is unrelated to the larger issue of what he's trying to cover with the MIAC report, but because it feels similar and Alex is kind of sympathetic to sovereign citizenship, he brings it up in order to weave this tapestry that is just...
The problem is that if you drive around and you don't have license plates or a driver's license, you're often going to be interacting with police.
And if you don't believe that they have the authority to stop you because you don't have license plates on your car, then it's going to become an issue.
That's much more problematic than just the possibly quirky...
And in this new document, it says there's also mainstream public groups that say they want state rights and that try to get involved in the community and say they want to work with police and sheriffs and say they want to work with the cities and they're secretly violent cell groups.
Look, just anybody involved in anything, you're a terrorist.
No, he has like a confirmation, I guess, that it's a real document from talking to the people at the Missouri Information Analysis Center, which is what MIAC stands for.
And so Rob Dew comes on to...
express what he has learned, and then we see what Alex's response to that is.
And he said it was a normal operation for officers, and that's his quote, and to receive these reports for, quote, safety purposes and to track trends or changes.
And he said more, but that's what I wrote down, so that's all I want to say that he quoted.
So they come back from commercial and Rob reiterates pretty much all the stuff he had already said, which is they confirmed that this was theirs and it was for training and educational use in law enforcement.
And by the way, the Alex Jones channel, which was not the official Alex Jones channel, but we work with the guy that has it now and have kind of taken it over, but he's still running it.
Most downloads or views, that's absolutely not him either.
That's not.
The only thing I think is possible is because he's just released this documentary, The Obama Deception, it's possible that he's rising through the ranks.
And now that he's already put it out and that's his narrative, he's going to move forward with it to the point where I remember episodes in like the 2015 stuff we're talking about in the past.
He's brought up the MIAC report.
Yeah.
unidentified
It's a giant piece of his mythology and it's all bullshit.
Also, by the way, I didn't include this, but the last hour and a half of March 12th, 2009, Alex brings back onto the show doctor, not doctor, Rebecca Carley.
Rebecca Carley, if you don't remember, is the doctor who years before...
Practice on public individuals and then became a hero of the anti-vax movement because of that same delusion.
So, congratulations, Alex.
I like 2009 so much.
So much fun.
So much weird shit.
I actually, stepping back now, I really don't think that I did a great job of explaining the MIAC report.
Because quite honestly, I could have done it much briefer.
I think I could have just said, it's a description of militia groups that the law enforcement had studied, commonalities, trends, things that they've noticed within it.
Alex is misrepresenting it by trying to invert the logic and saying that these commonalities, these similarities, if you have those similarities about you, you are then a militia member.
It wasn't like a cop was walking by and going like, hmm, I got a hunch something's going on over there.
These guys have intel.
And that is probably part of what the MIAC report is written on.
All of these undercover guys sharing information about the different militia groups that they're in.
That's why it's accurate.
Yeah, and even then, I'm sure the prescriptions therein aren't like, hey, if you see a guy who is a sovereign citizen, You know he's part of a militia group.
But it's like, if you see a guy who's doing all of this stuff, ask more questions.
The part that they're talking about militant anti-abortionists and white nationalists and Christian identity people, it very specifically says members of the militia movement often subscribe to the ideology of other right-wing extremist movements, such as, and then describe...