Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor - The Brilliant Ta-Nehisi Coates

Sept. 18, 2025 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor

01:00:04

The Brilliant Ta-Nehisi Coates

Jared Taylor and Paul Kersey laugh at accusations that Kirk was “an unreconstructed white supremacist.” They also discuss Camp of the Saints, Dearborn, Jimmy Kimmel, and Bonehead Bondi. Thumbnail credit: © Maxppp via ZUMA Press

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Ladies and gentlemen, dear listeners, welcome to Radio Renaissance.
	I'm your host, Jared Taylor.
	With me is, as usual, my indispensable co-host, the one and only Paul Kersey.
	Today is September 18th, Anodomini 2025.
	And as usual, we start with comments from listeners.
	This one goes like this.
	When I went through Border Patrol Academy, so now anything that begins like that, you know it's going to be interesting.
	I can recall one of our instructors telling us what not to do.
	His example was about what's called an I 213 narrative by one of the older agents whom we called the dinosaur.
	I 213s are the arrest narratives, that's to say, how the alien was encountered and why he was arrested.
	Now, this is back in 1999, and instructors said the narrative started off with something like I was traveling eastbound on military highway when I observed a Mercury Grand Marquee with four Mexican-looking individuals in it.
	I stopped the vehicle, and the narrative would go on.
	Well, some groups like the ACLU or La Rasa had sued to try to stop this.
	We were told that the dinosaur who did this never stopped doing vehicle stops on Mexican looking individuals.
	Trouble is, when that got to court, the cases were getting dismissed on Fourth Amendment grounds.
	After all, in the modern era, who's to say what an American looks like, merely being Mexican looking wasn't enough to make a stop.
	Yet the dinosaur persisted in doing it this way, even after his cases got tossed.
	Well, we asked the instructor, why do you keep doing that if the cases were being dismissed?
	First of all, he came into the border patrol at a time when racial profiling was absolutely the norm.
	If you looked Mexican, you probably were Mexican.
	Secondly, and even more important, when our instructor said the cases were being tossed, the illegals in the vehicle stops were still being sent back, but the criminal cases against the drivers for alien smuggling were being dismissed.
	The dinosaur didn't care that the drivers weren't being prosecuted, but because the illegals were still getting either voluntary returns or deportation, dispending on the aliens immigration andor criminal history.
	So when I finally got out in the field, we had one agent who still followed the formula of the dinosaur.
	But he got really good at coming up with other reasons.
	Things like proximity to the border, type of vehicle, claiming, whether or not true, that the target veal had sped up or slowed down when seeing his marked, his marked unit.
	For example, he would write, When I pulled alongside the vehicle in the passing lane, I looked at the driver and the passengers.
	None made eye contact.
	They looked straight ahead, as if my well-marked border patrol vehicle wasn't there.
	I remember one of the supervisors telling me how he used to pull up close on a suspect's bumper and swerve back and forth.
	Often this would cause the driver in front to also swerve back and forth as if taking evasive action.
	And if the suspect crossed the double line, he'd pull it over as a public security threat.
	You see, we weren't allowed to enforce drinking and driving laws, but if someone were truly out of control, we were allowed to pull them over for the safety of the public.
	Hmm.
	On the southern border, we were able to get away with a lot more.
	On the northern border, groups like the New York ACLU were able to make it so that each time we pulled over a vehicle, we had to write up a form explaining why.
	By contrast, I can recall traveling one of the Hispanic agents south of the Falfourias Border Patrol checkpoint on the southern border.
	He pulled over everything in sight.
	That's what we called a fishing expedition.
	He had zero worries about being accused of racial profile.
	He told me he could tell if a vehicle was going to be good by how quickly the driver the driver pulled over.
	If the driver tapped the brakes but then continued on for a bit, then he was hoping that it wasn't border patrol.
	It was that he wasn't singled out.
	And once he realized that He was singled out.
	He would be stalling for a bit while deciding whether to comply, pull over, bail out, or floor it and try to get away.
	At the end of the fishing expedition, we hadn't found anything, so we just went home.
	If that happened in New York State, we would have been there for hours just doing the paperwork on each vehicle stop.
	And our listeners' conclusion, lawfare works.
	Yes.
	If you make people, if you make uh officers in a field spend an hour worth of paperwork, every time they stop somebody, law enforcement is going to be seriously hobbled.
	Well, I thought that was an interesting set of observations from a guy who was actually in the border patrol, but as I say, he started in 1999.
	So I suspect he's been out for some time.
	Another comment.
	You and Mr. Kersey had a fine tribute to Charlie Kirk.
	I discovered him while pinballing around on YouTube.
	I like that, pinballing around.
	I guess you hit those bumpers and boy, you go in some direction you never expected.
	Any accusations of his supposed Nazi proclivities are easily refuted when you watch how he engages with rabid, acid spitting leftists, and often tries to find common ground with them.
	How he summoned up the patience and civility to do this is beyond me.
	He was doing great work and burning bright when he was murdered by that psychopath.
	Although I never met him, I take his death personally and intend to introduce his work to as many people as possible.
	Another comment.
	I did want to point out that in your video on the horrible killing of Rena Zarutka.
	And strictly speaking, this is not a comment on our podcast, Mr. Kerzy, but I will read it because I think it's relevant.
	Anyway, I did a whole video on her death, that poor Ukrainian refugee.
	But uh the commenter says, you mentioned none of the black passengers seated in the immediate area helped.
	Instead, they all just got up and left, and that certainly seems to be true.
	However, the longer footage of the incident that you can watch on the Wikipedia page about the murder shows that several passengers, including two black men.
	The footage isn't all that clear, but they appear to be black, came up to her aid, came to her aid later and tried to stop the breeding, bleeding, perform CPR and call it 911.
	I think they do deserve some credit, even if their efforts were ultimately unsuccessful, given the terrible severity of her blood loss.
	Yes, that's certainly true.
	It is my impression that after the first batch of blacks who witnessed the event or were awfully close to the event, they boogied off.
	There were a few blacks who did try to help, and we must give credit what credit is due.
	Last comment.
	Your discussion of the desecrated statues of southern heroes causes me to lapse into reverie.
	I have a dream.
	I see the MLK abomination on the mall being jackhammered into cantaloupe-sized lumps by concerned citizens.
	Well, Mr. Kerzy, I'm very much of two minds about that.
	I think I think it would be instructive to leave monuments like that up just as a sign of how insane this country was.
	It is important to realize that this adulterer, this plagiarizer, this guy who, as Charlie Kirk used to say, is famous for saying only one thing, and he didn't even believe in it.
	No.
	It is just remarkable that we really treated him as the second most important uh person or entity after Jesus Christ.
	He's the only person whose birthday, other than Jesus Christ is celebrated as a national holiday.
	Yeah.
	And we used to have Lincoln's birthday, Washington's birthday, but then they're just old dead white males.
	We can roll them all into one president's day, every single president.
	But Martin Luther King and Jesus Christ, they're the only ones whose birthdays are individually sold.
	I'd actually go step, I'd say no, uh they belong in museums and they won't be as we discussed last week with the black artist Carol Walker.
	We won't do anything to them, but they will be a testament to the folly of dedicating our nation's uh future to egalitarianism and to and to racial misthinking.
	Well, you'd have to clear out uh practically one of the halls in the Air and Space Museum to fit that giant statue of MLK in there.
	Uh as you recall, the sculptor who did that, he was chosen because he was famous for making these gigantic monumental sculptures of Mao Zatung.
	Oh, you're talking about the one in Washington, D.C. on the mall.
	Yeah, I'm talking about the one.
	I think that's the one he's talking about that we want to jackhammer into grapefruit grapefruits or cantaloupe-sized lumps.
	That's the one he's thinking of.
	The one on the mall, yes.
	That's big.
	That's big.
	I you know, as I as I say, I think uh once we are in a position to take those things down, we won't really have to.
	We can leave them as just the signs, the proofs of just how insane we once were.
	But I do understand the other point of view, too.
	And uh I've never operated Jackhammer.
	It looks like fun.
	Let's see.
	Ladies and gentlemen, we love to hear from you.
	We really do.
	And especially this guy who's had his personal experiences as a border patrol agent back in the days when you could racially profile without any consequence at all.
	Uh and the way to reach us is you can go to Amran.com, A-M-R-E-N.com.
	That is the mother page of this broadcast.
	And if you hit the contact us tab, you can send our message directly to me, or if you prefer to fill Mr. Cursey's inbox, you can do so.
	Please, by all means, uh, because we live here at ProtonMail.com.
	An email address again is because we live here at protonmail.com and specify if you'd like to be added to the once-a-week newsletter.
	You know, at some point I'm going to convince these guys to do SMS texting of some of the big articles or podcasts.
	Because I think some of our audience would love to get updated on their iPhone or Samsung device.
	And um, especially if there's big articles or more importantly, Mr. Taylor, are there still seats available for the November conference?
	There are.
	There are.
	That'll be November 14th through 16 in beautiful Montgomery Bell State Park, State of Tennessee, a state which is still relatively sane, and we would love to have you.
	As we used to say back in the 1960s, when I was growing up, be there or be square.
	It'll be a great time.
	It'll be an absolutely great time.
	And on the homepage of the Amran site, you will see the information about it, and you can sign up right then and there.
	Now, let's see.
	I had a little story that uh I entitled Bonehead Bondy.
	Now, maybe that was a little harsh, but she of the Justice Department uh the other day said that she will absolutely target anyone who targets others with hate speech.
	She said there's free speech, and then there's hate speech.
	And there is no place, especially now after what happened to Charlie in our society for hate speech.
	Bondy said, we will target you, go after you if you are targeting targeting anyone with hate speech, and that's across the aisle.
	I guess whether Democrat or Republican, you open your mouth and you emit hate speech, we'll go after you.
	She suggested that she has directed the Justice Department, civil rights divis division, also to prosecute businesses that refuse to print Kirk's pictures for vigilants.
	President Donald Trump and other White House officials have repeatedly said they would use the Justice Department in the wake of Kirk's assassination to explicitly target left-wing groups.
	Now, when a reporter asked President Trump about Bondy's speech on the subject of uh prosecution for hate speech, she says, we'll probably go after you because you treat me so unfairly.
	You have a lot of hate in your heart.
	Maybe they'll have to go after you.
	Well, as you know, Mr. Cursey, I think this talk is insane.
	Absolutely insane.
	There's no such thing as hate speech.
	It's at least it's not a legal category.
	It's perfectly illegal.
	And once a Trump administration starts really going after people for what it calls hate speech, you know that you and I, if the shoe is ever on the other foot, will be targets number one.
	I know there are people who say doesn't matter, they're going to come after us no matter what.
	But I think that if we have taken the first step in doing this kind of thing, that will all the more embolden those who think that you and I, Mr. Cursey, should actually be in the big house for the things that we say.
	Now, later on, Ms. Bondi, after people really uh told her to figure out what hate speech is, that it's protected by the First Amendment, it's not a crime.
	She did change her tune.
	And in a written statement, she says she was talking about criminal groups or people who incite violence, not those who say hateful things.
	My intention was to speak about threats of violence, that individuals incite against each other.
	She said, Well, I wonder if that's true.
	I wonder if she's an ignoramus.
	I wonder if she was just uh off her meds that day when she's talking about hate speech.
	I don't know.
	But I think that is very dangerous and stupid talk.
	And I think the way the president said uh, if he's trying to clarify this situation, say, well, we'll go after you, reporter, because you hate us.
	That is really really no good at all.
	And uh also another thing she said is for far too long we've watched the radical left normalize threats, call for assassinations and cheer on political violence.
	That era is over.
	I'm not sure who she is talking about.
	Uh uh I I you know the only group, the only group that I think that can be legitimately investigated, and apparently Trump has designated a terrorist organization just recently, is is Antifa.
	Those guys, the guys who walk around in the black block, and uh they have uh uh they they really are a violent bunch.
	Perhaps I think they could have Rico charges brought against them.
	But other than that, no.
	Furthermore, and Mr. Cursey, I've complained about this before.
	I think it is profoundly stupid to talk about changing policy because of a single event, no matter how spectacular.
	You know, the left, um, somebody gets shot up, uh, anybody, say a school shooting, and all of a sudden people talk about gun control, and all of a sudden they got different ideas of uh the way the world ought to work.
	One event should not be the basis of for some kind of policy change.
	And again, I am very suspicious of any attack on free speech.
	And yes.
	We all know regrettably that the 20, I think it was 2015 when Dylan Roof uh did what he did in Charleston, South Carolina, and that's the impetus behind removing the Confederate flag by the Indian governor of that state, Indian female governor, at which then held uh mayor uh mayor the guy in New Orleans, I can't think of his last name, Landrew.
	Landry, yes.
	Uh Mitch Landrew to get rid of the Robert E. Lee statute.
	That set in motion all the events which culminated last week in what we talked about, the Stonewall Jackson statue being unceremoniously beheaded by the black artists for the display that's going to be in Los Angeles.
	And you're right.
	I mean, go back to January go back to January 6th, 2021, sir.
	It's astonishing to see the speed in which Trump was removed from almost every platform.
	I mean, do you think that you remember the website Parlour?
	There they were gone overnight because uh people went on there and said this is where this quote unquote insurrection was planned.
	Parlor was was gone, it was removed.
	That's I'd forgotten about parlor.
	I was on Parlor.
	I had been dumped from Twitter, and parlor was a very promising up-and-coming thing with a lot of people on it, uh, a lot of things that uh you could say there that you couldn't say back in the days of uh uh Dorsey's uh Twitter.
	It was it, I think it had a great future going, and it was just strangled in its crib.
	Oh, oh yeah.
	And then, you know, you you look at the whole reason why Donald Trump started Truth Social, it was because he had no platform on Facebook.
	He had no platform.
	He was banned from Twitter, he was banned from Facebook, he was banned from Instagram, he was banned from Snapchat, he was banned from TikTok, he was banned from Apple, Discord, he had his Pinterest account.
	Pro-Trump topics such as stop the steal were no longer allowed on Pinterest.
	I forgot what Pinterest is.
	Um, suddenly they were back in the news for their ignominy.
	Yep.
	Uh no, it's uh to to again, well, and of course, uh the death of George Floyd.
	Uh and for that, that one act to have resulted in this insane, what they called racial reckoning, but what really went really boils down to is a racial beatdown of the white man.
	The This kind of thinking really, really irritates me, whether on the right or not, whether on the left.
	But in that context, here we're back into a similar situation that does disturb me, and that's the Jimmy Kimmel situation.
	I have never, I've never paid any attention to Jimmy Kimmel.
	His name is only vaguely familiar to me.
	I never watch uh television to begin with, and late night television while I'm uh in bed sucking my little pink toes.
	But on Monday, apparently, he said, we hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and doing everything they can to score political points from it.
	Now, uh, it does appear that he was not MAGA, but this is something that he's not getting.
	He wasn't mug at all.
	He was a furry.
	He was, he was, it was uh apparently his parents were MAGA.
	And now, the odd thing about this is we have heard practically nothing about his political views.
	The only thing we've heard is that he had this tranny lover, this uh boy who apparently thinks he's a girl and is on his way to becoming a girl.
	That's the only thing we know about his political views.
	And I mean, is he in favor of strict border control?
	I don't know.
	Does he think the did he think the COVID lockdowns were a terrible thing?
	I don't know.
	Does he like small government or big government?
	We don't know.
	We have no idea.
	That's the only thing.
	Now, my suspicion is, uh, and I don't know, maybe is he a big uh anti-Second Amendment guy?
	I get the impression not.
	But uh we don't know anything about his political views, and so if you say he's MAGA guy, probably not, that's very unlikely, but uh we just don't know.
	And of course, all the political views that go with having a tranny boyfriend or girlfriend or of whatever friend you want to call it, that is generally associated with views that are anti-MAGA, but be that as it may.
	Uh, Jimmy Kimmel said this.
	Well, then his show is immediately taken off the air, and the New York Post says it knows why.
	It's due to a $6.2 billion takeover of a broadcaster Tegna by Nextar.
	And this deal was already controversial.
	It would combine two of the nation's largest owners of local TV stations.
	It poses significant antitrust questions and needs a closer view by the Federal Communications Commission.
	As it turns out, the FCC has a new chairman, Brendan Carr, appointed by Trump.
	And Kimmel's comments really riled Carr.
	He said the broadcaster's license could be pulled.
	And he added, we can solve this problem the easy way or the hard way, implying either you fire this guy or we could pull your broadcaster's license.
	Now, Carr, I don't know, Mr. Mr. Cursey if you'd pay any attention to him, but it's only now in the news that I've become aware of him.
	He's apparently a telecoms lawyer.
	He's been warning networks, large and small, that he is taking one of the most expansive views of the agent's regulatory edict to make sure programming is in the public interest.
	First Amendment to be damned.
	Unlike with cable, the FCC has the authority to throttle content that airs on the public airways, that is to say, local over-the-air TV, by withholding broadcast license.
	Now, I don't know when the last time that's ever been done, but in the past, the FCC has given very wide latitude for broadcast to air anything, anything except obscenity.
	And of course, when they have veered into radical territory, it's almost always been lefty.
	People like Stephen Colbert or Kimmel, and uh even sometimes alleged uh straight news broadcasts like 60 Minutes, they can get away with very, very heavily left-wing stuff.
	But as Carr put it in an interview Wednesday with Sean Hannity, he says, running a narrow partisan circus.
	Well, whatever the public interest means, it's not that.
	Well, probably I can easily imagine a future administration saying that that's what Fox News does.
	It is a narrow partisan circus.
	And uh this guy Carr's impact has already been pretty dramatic, Paramount settled a suit with President Trump over CBS's interview with Kamala Harris during the 2024 campaign, fearing that the FCC under carr wouldn't approve its $8 billion sale to independent studio Skydance.
	And other broadcast networks have been settling various lawsuits.
	Trump ABC forked over $16 million to settle a suit over a comment made by George Stephanopoulos.
	Apparently, just to stay on Carr's good side.
	And Kimmel, you know, Kimmel is a comedian, I understand.
	And is the idea he's distorting the news?
	Uh I mean, I don't think anybody would have thought that unless the broadcasters had a deal that they wanted approved by FCC.
	That would have been considered first and then protected speech under any previous administration.
	Now, frankly, I don't like this.
	If you have regulatory authority and you suddenly start using it to silence people who say the things politically you don't want said, I think that is a terrible precedent.
	I know what you think.
	I don't think Jimmy Kimmel was saying things that people didn't once said.
	I think he was deliberately misleading his audience.
	Uh it's been it's been very horrifying, Mr. Taylor, to read polls of people saying that they think a Republican or a conservative or a graper, one of Nick Fuentes' followers was behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
	And that's that's that's that's been disseminating by people like Jimmy Kimmel.
	And as you said, Fox News does not fall under that rubric.
	It's not broadcast um in the same way that ABC gets their license.
	It's on cable.
	Right.
	I go back real quick.
	I go back and I think about Fox News broadcast uh questioning uh the election, and there were a lot of very good questions that regrettably were were were put in the back burner due to the events of what happened on J6 that were going to be brought up.
	And Fox News had to settle, and I think uh Newsmax or OANN, they both had to also settle with Dominion.
	Uh the company that that was doing the um the ballot collection.
	But that that's the way the system is supposed to work.
	If you have done some kind of offense against the truth, that you have maligned a company, that that that's the company that sues.
	You don't have the government who is in the regulatory business saying this is out of line and this is defamation.
	Uh I think that's a very, very dangerous, uh, a dangerous precedent.
	And uh, I mean, uh, I hate to say this, but it really does seem to be that uh the lefties are not entirely off the mark when they say that uh President Trump doesn't care about too many niceties about the way things work.
	He wants things his way, and if the regulations can be manipulated to do that, that's what he's gonna do.
	Now, I will say that when I hear all the lefties now screeching about the First Amendment.
	Oh my gosh, well, well, First Amendment.
	They sure weren't screeching about it when we were being throttled.
	Uh they didn't care if, of course, generally it was uh private organizations that were making sure that we could not be heard or seen on YouTube.
	We got kicked off X, off PayPal, of you name it, uh Facebook, Facebook, Facebook, Instagram.
	I had an Instagram account.
	All I ever did was photo was exchange of photographs with my children.
	Couldn't have that because I'm a bad, bad guy.
	I've lost count of all the places I've been kicked off of.
	But nobody, yeah, nobody on the left would have shed the slightest tear.
	Amazon refusing to sell our books.
	Uh they would have said, oh, that's just pure pirate enterprise, too bad, too bad.
	They don't care about the First Amendment.
	But they do care about when somebody comes to shut them up.
	Three quick anecdotes.
	Gina Carl, uh, she was an actress uh for the Mandalorian show, and she questioned uh a number of aspects of COVID.
	She was fired uh by Disney, uh, which also owns ABC.
	No one really fought for her free speech rights, except for right-wing organizations.
	Roseanne Barr was removed from the show.
	That's for sure.
	Uh back in 2018, the Connors, the reboot of the Roseanne show from the 80s, and the left kind of celebrated.
	Uh I I had a I had a quote pulled up here from some lefty who was celebrating it then, and now they're talking about authoritarianism, and it's like, well, wait a second.
	You were celebrating Roseanne being removed, and the same thing happened.
	You can see a video of Jimmy Kimmel celebrating Tucker Carlson finally being fired by Fox News back in 2023.
	The only, The only possible distinction is that if in fact the current government is using regulatory power, government power to put pressure on folks to fire people who are making things, making statements that politically disagree with, that is different.
	That's different with the public, that's different from a corporate decision with Roseanne Barr, for example, or with Carlson, but still, I think uh they are very much open to charges of gross hypocrisy on this.
	But anyway, uh, what does our good buddy Tanahisi have to say about these matters, but at least about uh Charlie Kirk?
	You know, sir, what's fascinating is when this guy would write something a few years ago, the entire country was supposed to immediately stop what they were doing and digest his wisdom that was on par with Shakespeare, uh, the way that he was compared.
	And he just wrote something in Vanity Fair.
	And let's just get some of the key lines out because a lot of people on the left on on X have celebrated this as this is I wish I had written this.
	I wish I could write this well.
	It has the headline, Charlie Kirk Redeemed.
	A political class finds its lost cause by Tanisi Codes, as you said.
	A lost cause.
	I think we know what they mean by that.
	Yes.
	Before he was killed last week, Charlie Kirk left a helpful compendium of words, ones that would greatly aid those who sought to understand his legacy and import.
	Somewhat difficult to match these words with the manner in which Kirk is presently being memorialized in mainstream discourse.
	New York Times columnist Ezra Klein dubbed Kirk, quote, one of the era's most effective practitioners of persuasion, in quote, and a man who was practicing politics in exactly the right way.
	I would actually agree with that entirely.
	California governor Gavin Newsom held Kirk's passion and commitment to debate, advising us to continue Kirk's work by engaging with each other across ideology through spirited discourse.
	Atlantic writer Sally Jenkins saluted Klerk, claiming he argued with civility and asserting that his death was a significant loss for those who believe engagement can help bridge disagreements.
	You know, um Mr. Kerzy, I am rather impressed that those lefties wrote such words about Charlie Kirk.
	That's pretty impressive.
	Yeah, I agree.
	And Gavin Newsom actually, I think they I think Charlie Kirk appeared on one of Gavin Newsom's first podcasts where they said that's right.
	And they did a video together, and it was a very cordial and it was a it was a friendly uh environment.
	I was actually very impressed with with both of them in that exactly right, exactly right.
	I think that's the way, certainly at least white people ought to approach each other, no matter what our political differences.
	But that's not the way that Mr. Coates.
	Well, he's not a white man, is he?
	He is not a white man.
	He is a he's a black guy who just wants to write comic books and wonder why he was rejected by white women for so long.
	Uh it's not just, for instance, that Kirk held disagreeable disagreeable views that he was pro-life, that he believed in public executions, or that he rejected the separation of church and state.
	It's Kirk's revealed, I'm sorry, reveled in open bigotry.
	Indeed, claims of Kirk's civility are tough to square with his penchant for demeaning members of the LGBTQ plus community as freaks and referring to trans people with the slur tranny.
	Oh my gosh, oh my gosh, he deserved to be shot.
	I take it all back.
	By by uh by a fury tranny who is in a relationship training.
	Yeah.
	Faced prospect of Kamala Harris presidency, Kirk told his audience that the threat had to be averted because Harris wanted to kidnap your children, your child via the trans agenda.
	Garden variety transphobia is sadly unremarkable, but Kirk was a master of folding seemingly discordant bigotries into each other, as when he defined the American way of life as marriage, homeownership, child rearing, free of the lesbian, gay, transgender, garbage in their school, adding that he did not want kids to have to hear the Muslim call to prayer five times a day.
	The American way of life is Christendom, Kirk claimed, and Islam, the sword the left is using to slit the throne of America was antithetical to that.
	Now go ahead.
	Go ahead.
	No, no, I'm just I'm just marveling at how how sensible Charlie Kirk was.
	Yeah, Kirk uh large dedicated Islamic areas were a threat to America, which we're going to talk About in this podcast in a future story, Kirk asserted, and New York may oral candidate, Zoran Mamdani was a Mohammedan, with Kirk supposing that anyone trying to use Mohammedanism takeover of the West.
	I think it's a Mohammedan.
	Well, again, I love to be corrected like last week, apparition, not apparation.
	So But I like Mohammedian.
	Uh there's got a certain ring to that.
	Um I think I'll start using that.
	Well, there's Mohammedans.
	Well, anyway.
	But anyways, carry on.
	Carry on.
	Mohammedism take over the West would love to have New York a prior Anglo center under Mohamidian rule.
	Mohammedan Mohammedan.
	Again, whatever.
	It's it's uh I'm laughing over the fact that uh Kirk called it an Anglo center because it hasn't been an Anglo Center in a long time, so no.
	But I think I think we should just abbreviate them all as muzzy.
	Muzzle.
	Okay.
	Muzzy rule.
	But but it's fascinating that uh Kirk, I'm wondering I'm wondering what parts of uh what parts of NYC Kirk has spent his time at.
	But again, going back to Mr. Coates's piece, Kirk habitually railed against black crime.
	Good for him, claiming that prowling blacks go around for fun to go target white people.
	He repeated the rape accusations against Salam, a member of the exonerated Central Park 5, Yusuf Salam, who is now a New York City councilman, calling him a disgusting pig who had gotten away with gang rape.
	Whatever distaste Kirk held for blacks was multiplied when he turned to those from Haiti.
	Haiti was, by Kirk's lights, a country infested with demonic voodoo whose migrants were raping your women and hunting you down at night.
	These Haitians, as well as undocumented immigrants from other countries, were having a field day per Kirk and coming for your daughter next.
	The only hope was Donald Trump who had to prevail.
	These Tatians became your masters.
	Well, we know what happens when Haitians become the masters of white people.
	So the point of this so-called mastery was as familiar as it was conspiratorial.
	Great replacement.
	There was an anti-white agenda, Kirk howled, one that sought to make the country more like the third world.
	The southern border was the dumping ground of the planet, Kirk claimed, and a magnet for the rapists, the thugs, the murderers, fighting age males.
	They're coming from across the world, from China, from Russia, from Middle Eastern countries, Kirk said.
	And they're coming in and they're coming in and they're coming in and they're coming in.
	You can probably imagine where this line of thinking eventually went.
	Jewish donors, Kirk claimed, were the number one funding mechanism of radical open border, neoliberal quasi-Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits.
	Indeed, the philosophical foundation of anti-whiteness has largely been financed by Jewish donors in the country.
	End quote.
	Well, Tanahisi prove that it's not.
	I think proof falls on Tanahisi.
	Yes, the burden does.
	And here's here's the key line.
	What are we to make of a man who called for the execution of the American president and then was executed himself?
	What are we to whose execution did he call for?
	Uh, did Kirk call for anyone's execution?
	I don't believe he called for the execution of the quote unquote head of the quote Biden end quote administration.
	Um I don't think so.
	I never I mean that is such an extraordinary claim that you would think that he would have something in quotes.
	There's no hyperlink there either.
	There's no hyperlink.
	We have no idea where what's this blacks are famous for?
	Voice merging, and uh they don't uh pay much attention to footnotes, uh Tom Easy Baby.
	You need to learn.
	Anyway.
	Hopefully, Miss Kirk, who's now taken over the as the head of TP USA, hopefully she sees this piece and she will.
	Where exactly did he say that?
	That's that's defamation and libel, sir.
	Uh, but here, going back to the piece.
	Yes.
	Coach writes, what are we to make of an NFL that on one hand encourages us to end racism, and on the other, urges us to commemorate an unreconstructed white supremacist?
	And what are the writers, the thinkers, and the pundits who cannot separate the great crime of Kirk's death from the malignancy of his public life?
	Can they truly be so ignorant of to the words of a man they have so rushed to memorialize?
	I don't know.
	But the most telling detail in Klein's column was that for all his praise, there was not a single word in the piece from Kirk himself.
	More than a century and a half ago, this country ignored the explicit words of men who sought to raise an empire of slavery.
	It subsequently transformed those men into gallant knights who sought only to preserve their beloved Camelot.
	There was fatigue in certain quarters with reconstruction, which is to say multiracial democracy and a desire for reunion to make America great again.
	Thus in the late 19th century and much of the 20th, the country's most storied intellectuals transfigured hate mongers into heroes and ignored their words.
	Just as right now some are ignoring Kirk's.
	Words are not violence, nor are they powerless, bearing the truth in Confederacy, rewriting its aims and ideas, and ignoring its animated words allowed for the terrorization of the black population, the imposition of apartheid, and the destruction of democracy.
	I didn't realize the United States had apartheid, but okay, I guess that's what they're calling Jim Crow.
	The rewriting and ignoring were done not just by Confederates, but also by putative allies, from whom the reduction of black people to serfdom was the unfortunate price of white unity.
	The import of this history has never been clearer than in this moment when the hard question must be asked.
	If you would look away from the words of Charlie Kirk, from what else would you look away?
	Mr. Taylor, I have to ask, I think we should have looked harder and with far more admiration at the words of Charlie Kirk.
	Well, uh, it is very interesting that the words of Charlie Kurtz, that Tancy chooses to hold up for contempt, for ridicule, for proof of white supremacy, bigotry, all this evil.
	Probably I'm a little bit surprised he didn't suggest that Charlie Kirk wanted to reinstitute slavery.
	That seems like the logical conclusion to everything else he's saying.
	But it just goes to show you how utterly, utterly different blacks and wide awake whites view the world, view the significance, significance of those words.
	Never the Twain shall meet.
	And if uh Tanesi Coates wants to live in his world, I'm perfectly welcome to let him do so so long as his world is physically separated from mine.
	Yeah, there's a place called Monrovia, Liberia.
	I think he'd have a lot of fun living in.
	Maybe.
	I don't know.
	I've never been there.
	I've heard it's nice.
	It's not.
	I have been there.
	Wakanda, it is not, sir.
	Now I have a piece of good news.
	You are certainly aware of this because you're always aware of everything long before I am, but the Camp of the Saints is back in print.
	Mm-hmm.
	Pub date was September 16th, 2025.
	So it's been on sale for at least two days.
	Now that is what's been called the dystopian novel by Jean Rospay.
	I think it's not so much dystopian, really, as uh a prophetic novel.
	And it's got a brand new translation by a fellow named Ethan Rondell.
	Ethan Rondell is the co-founder of Vaubon Books.
	Great Great Enterprise.
	Oh, oh, it's absolutely wonderful.
	He is the translator and publisher of Renault Camus, who I consider the foremost philosopher of our time.
	It has an introduction, the new version has an introduction by a fellow named Nathan Pinkoski.
	I've never heard of him, but he's a scholar of French political thoughts.
	It also includes the 2011 preface that Rospay wrote by way as a final testament to the book.
	And again, this is a new original translation by Rondell, who I am in a position to tell you because I read Camus in French as well.
	He is really a he does a masterful job.
	And after years of neglect, it is now back available in English, and it will allow a new generation to pose Raspise questions for themselves and measure the distance we have come or not.
	I think that's even more important since the book was first published more than 50 years ago.
	Now, it seems to me, when I read this, I guess I read it maybe 20 years ago.
	I remember thinking that although he wrote it in 1973, and then I was reading it perhaps around 2000, he perfectly pegged the kind of psychological self-castration of the West, the ruthlessness of the third world, the utter delusions that Europeans live in and build their lives on.
	All that, if you read it today, is as fresh and we see it before us every single day, as fresh as it was.
	And he saw it in 1973.
	It was really remarkable.
	Nothing like this had yet been happening in France, which is where he's from.
	So those of you who have not read this book, it's available on Amazon.
	You can't buy my books on Amazon, but you can buy Jean Rush by Camp of the Saints.
	And I think it will be, if you've not read him, it will be an investment that will be well worthwhile.
	Yeah, it's fascinating to think that one of his quotes has become almost a standard to see from conservatives.
	Wrong word, to see from American Patriots on Twitter, where he wrote, quote, your universe has no meaning to them.
	They will not try to understand.
	They will not be, they will be tired, they will be cold, they will make a fire with your beautiful oak door.
	You see that constantly, Mr. Taylor on X. Yes.
	And the book, the book is interesting.
	I read it in 2002, and unfortunately, he had too much hope and faith in the South Africans who had voted to give up their country back in 1992 and then transitioned to a multiracial democracy.
	The South Africans were one of the few places on earth that held out uh from the uh the Indian, the Indian uh boats that were coming to uh Europe.
	So I do remember that part vividly.
	And I think there was one mad Russian general of the Soviet Union still exists in that book.
	So it is interesting to think about how it is a product of its time and what all happened in the West.
	But it is a book you need to get.
	You can get it in uh soft cover uh paperback or hardcover, actually.
	So and uh quite reasonably priced.
	Uh, I don't remember the the I think it's under $20, the paperback.
	Uh yeah, the more people buy an Amazon, the cheaper it gets.
	Yes, yes.
	Uh and uh no, I uh uh again, the psychology of the West, the psychology of the white man, the just the utter, utter power of self-deception that white people demonstrate is vividly captured.
	Again, by guy who saw it all coming in 1973.
	Hats off to Jean Rospath.
	Well, let's see.
	Just another little matter here.
	I probably should have included this when we were talking about the celebrations of uh Charlie Kirk's death.
	But Luigi Mangioni, he's the guy, of course, who killed United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson.
	He appeared in court this week, the same week in which uh the assassin of Charlie Kirk appeared.
	And uh lo and behold, there was a crowd outside the courthouse.
	Now, I can't tell how large it was.
	It seemed like several hundred people there, and they were cheering him.
	They were absolutely cheering him.
	And the left loves to talk about how potentially violent the right is.
	But these days, boy, it sure does seem to be the lefties are the most vicious gun toters around.
	And I was uh struck by Senator Elizabeth Warren's comments about this.
	She says, violence is never the answer, but people can be pushed only so far.
	Hmm.
	Okay, Elizabeth.
	Uh okay, they can be pushed only so far, and then I guess we're suspect we can suspect we can expect the the lead to fly.
	Well, you know, Elizabeth, we can be pushed only so far.
	And are you gonna expect the lid to fly your way?
	Boy, oh boy, these are exciting times.
	Now, Mr. Cursey, I believe, yes, uh, you have this very interesting story about Dearborn, Michigan, one of those places where the Great Replacement has done its job.
	I was trying to find the demographics for Dearborn for the past 50 years, and unfortunately, I was unable to locate them before we got started.
	But um, nevertheless, there's a very big story that is animating social media.
	I mean, there's so much happening right now, sir, but this is one of those stories that people are really paying attention to.
	Dearborn mayor tells resident he's not welcome in city after opposing sign for Arab Leader.
	Uh, this appeared in the Detroit Free Press.
	The Dearborn Mayor's name is Abdullah Hamud, and he told Resident He's not welcome the city after he objects to a street signs.
	Two street signs honoring Arab American leader Osama Sidlani were placed up on Warren Avenue.
	So the mayor, the mayor of Dearborn, which is a heavily Islamic town, uh heavily Muslim town now.
	In fact, I think I saw a ballot recently for uh an election, and every name was a I think what is now commonly called a Star Wars foreign, obviously Muslim uh name.
	Yeah, they that's what Mohammedan Mohammedan, yes.
	Uh that's that is correct.
	They are definitely not uh they're definitely not followers of uh of Christendom.
	Uh well he ripped into into a white resident who objected to the placing of the two signs in the city honoring the uh the aforementioned Arab American leader, telling the resident, hey, you're you're not welcome here.
	And the fiery remarks at Tuesday's council meeting last September night, uh September 9th.
	Hamood also told the resident that if he moves out of Dearborn, he will have a parade celebrating it.
	Speaking during the public comments, part of the meeting, a resident Ted Barham.
	I wonder how long he's lived in Dearborn.
	You know, Dearborn is home to Bob Seeger.
	That's that's definitely well before my time, music-wise, but were you a Bob Seeker fan?
	Not really, not really.
	Well, uh Barham had objected to signs from Wayne County placed on Warren Avenue, named after Osama Sablani, a longtime Arab American leader, because of past statements on some Middle Eastern groups.
	The day before the council meeting, the signs were unveiled in a ceremony attended by Hamood Sablani and several other officials and Arab American advocates.
	It seems very provocative to have these signs up there, Barham said.
	It's almost like naming a street, Hezbollah Street or Hamas Street.
	Hamood responded, I want you to know as mayor, you're not welcome here.
	And the day you move out of the city will be the day that I launch a parade, celebrating the fact that you moved out of a city because you're not somebody who believes in coexistence.
	Said with no sense of irony.
	No, no, no.
	Uh Hamood also told Baram to not drive along Warren Avenue where the signs are placed, or close his eyes as he's driving past them.
	Yes, as this means advocating him getting in a car accident.
	Yeah.
	Hamud then accused Barham of being a bigot based on a video Barm had posted online.
	So I guess he's I guess he's stalking the guy's social media.
	It's unclear what remarks Baram allegedly made on video that Hamood was referring to, a review of a video by the free press that Amood made, may have been referring to did not find racist remarks by Baram.
	Again, uh hate speech is speech the left hates or that uh that Muslims hate, apparently.
	So that's right.
	Aram started off his remarks by saying some Sablani, the publisher of the Arab American News, a Dearborn-based newspaper.
	I'm sure he's done a lot of good things for the community, starting the Arab American news.
	Again, why do we have Arab American news in America?
	Who thought that was a good idea to allow for a mass concentration of whether it's Muslims in Dearborn, Somalians in Minneapolis, where you have these ethnic groups that start to advocate exclusively for uh, you know, augmenting their rights as a people.
	It's just it's fascinating.
	Here we are now in 2025, and these are all big issues on the American right.
	Uh, because it shows that conservatives sure didn't conserve anything.
	He added that he added that people in Dearborn should be concerned about some of his previous statements.
	I'm referring to Sablani.
	He then quoted from past statements made regarding Palestinians and battle and martyrs.
	The quotes from Sablani that Baram read appear to be taken from the Middle East Media Research Institute, a pro-Israel group that monitors what is considered to be extremism, but what has been accused by Arab American advocates for being bigoted.
	In 2024, Sablani and others denounced at a press conference in OPED in the Wall Street Journal, written by the executive director of that organization that called Dearborn, America's Jihad Capital.
	Well, sir, if I lived in America's jihad capital, I'd be moving too.
	I don't think I'd be worried about what streets are named.
	I'd be saying we're out.
	We're out.
	Kids, let's let's go.
	Um, uh, I got the information that you were perhaps seeking.
	Dearborn is 55% Middle Eastern, North African or Arab, and probably Muslim.
	Mostly Lebanese, Yemeni, and Iraqis, oddly enough.
	So there you go.
	All the Lebanese, all the Lebanese people I know are Christians and they had family in Beirut, and they're just fantastic people.
	They definitely wouldn't uh find living in this area conducive to their uh to their children.
	Probably not.
	It's only 4% black.
	But be that as it was.
	Nothing cash for them like the Arabs did when they were slaves.
	I didn't say that.
	No, you certainly didn't say that, right?
	Yeah, I sure didn't hear.
	Those barbers.
	Quick, after Hamood attacked Baron during the meeting, Baram walked away from the podium and said to Hamood, God bless you, Mayor.
	Hamood then replied, You also say that I'm apostate.
	I'm going to hell.
	If I were you, I would stay silent.
	Sariani then said, okay, thank you.
	We don't want to have any more outbursts.
	That was another member of the council who we didn't quote from.
	But again, this was a very odd exchange.
	And if you were to show this article, Mr. Taylor, to an American in, say September 12th, 2020, I think they'd be hard-pressed to say, wait a second, what wars did America lose in the intervening years to see a town basically be taken over by Muslims.
	We lost psychological wars.
	We lost verbal wars.
	We lost any kind of moral war.
	We lost the war for our survival ultimately.
	Ultimately winning it back.
	Anyway, well, that is a good lead up to a story about a Houston area imam.
	We have Imams everywhere now.
	He has sparked concern after launching a campaign to pressure Muslim-owned stores to stop selling pork, alcohol, and lottery tickets.
	Lottery tickets.
	Does the Quran ban lottery tickets?
	The campaign led by Imam F. Qasim ibn Ali Khan of the Masjid Al-Tawid temple was captured in a viral video, confronting a store employee and accusing the business of selling haram products.
	They are forbidden under Islamic law.
	Now, Khan, who leads a nation of Islam affiliated mosque.
	Now, this is quite interesting to me.
	I probably should have licked him up, but I guess this guy who goes by the name of F. Qasim bin Ali Khan must be what we are supposed to call an African American.
	It's nation of Islam.
	But he says they're going to force boycott.
	They're going to face boycotts and public protest if they refuse to comply.
	He says a nationwide protest movement is set to begin specifically targeting Muslim businesses that violate Islamic teaching.
	In several videos, Mr. Khan, who has 17,000 followers on TikTok, he is seen confronting this guy at a Muslim-owned store.
	He says, this is the beginning of the campaign.
	We're serving notice to America and the world that enough is enough.
	They have until the end of the month to change their inventory or move.
	Well, so this is very interesting.
	Again, it goes to show you what happens when you really push diversity in the direction in which it will inevitably go.
	Just as Dearborn is putting up these signs, celebrating their guys.
	Here we must have enough people so that you've got Muslim storekeepers, but then you've got other Muslims who say that they are violating Islamic law.
	So we have this internocene, war of Muslim against Muslim right here in America.
	This is what eventually comes down to.
	Now here's another interesting story.
	A federal judge in Shenandoah County, Virginia, has ruled in favor of five students who challenged the name change of two of the county schools.
	The case began in 2024 after the school board changed two county schools back to their original names that honored Confederate war figures, Stonewall Jackson, Turner Ashby, and Robert E. Lee.
	In 2020, of course, they were sucked into this mass white insanity and changed their names from something patriotic and southern.
	I can't even remember what their names were, but they ripped the Confederate names off the buildings.
	Now, this suit was led by five students represented by the Virginia NAACP.
	Once again, diversity and action.
	The NAACP said forcing black students to attend a school honoring Confederates denies them equal opportunities to education and violates their First Amendment rights.
	You know, it's interesting that you can deny someone's First Amendment rights – And you're not saying anything about what that person can say.
	Excuse me.
	Seems like an odd way to violate somebody's First Amendment rights.
	A Kathy Wreck, a delegate candidate in the Commonwealth 33rd District, she's a candidate for the State House, said her daughter faced issues after graduating when she moved out of state.
	When she'd take her resume to get jobs, they'd look down and say, ah, yeah, okay, okay.
	Then they see that Stonewall Jackson High School is where she graduated, and they all say, ah, she's a racist.
	I mean, how likely is that, for heaven's sake?
	This article was on to say the decision does not change the school names yet immediately, but it goes beyond just the walls of Senador County schools and could play a pivotal role in future decisions around the country.
	Now, the idea apparently that if black students are going to Stonewall Jackson High School, they are suffering some kind of curtailment of their First Amendment rights.
	That just seems amazing to me.
	And they're not having equal opportunities in education.
	Well, they're going to the same school as all these privileged white people, not equal opportunities.
	Now, what I wonder is can I beef if my children are going to Martin Luther King elementary school?
	Communist, adulterer, plagiarizer?
	How about the street names?
	Yeah.
	I mean, if I'm forced to put the uh Martin Luther King's name on my return address, uh, can I beef about that?
	Well, Mr. Taylor, there's something wrong if you live on a Martin Luther King Jr.
	Avenue.
	I think we've read all the studies about what that would mean for your property value and for the potentiality of being a victim of crime or uh but that could happen.
	Uh you know, uh that could happen.
	You know, uh Louisville, which is where Mohammed Ali is from.
	It used to have an important downtown street called Chestnut Avenue.
	But Chestnut Avenue is now Mohammed Ali Boulevard.
	There was uh there was uh an old Wasp club called the Pendentist Club on Chestnut Avenue, and it simply refused to change its stationery.
	For years, it continued to be perhaps the only address still on Chestnut Avenue.
	It refused to put Mohammed Ali Boulevard on its return address.
	Remember, we talked about it at length, uh the county King County where Seattle is located.
	They just decided, yeah, we don't want to have a county name for an old dead white male.
	Let's just retcon it and as Martin Luther King uh King County.
	Exactly.
	Or junior King County.
	Kirk County sounds a lot better in my eyes.
	And my amount of Kirk County.
	Yes.
	Yeah, well, that, you know, Kirk is Scottish for church.
	So that's appropriate too.
	Let's see.
	Now, I guess we've got time for one last story.
	Good grief.
	Tempest shona fusion around.
	Based on what we've talked about and putting uh, you know, putting a regrettable bow on everything with Charlie Kirk, I recommend just reading what the uh SPLC down in Montgomery put out regarding Kirk.
	Well, let's see.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Okay, let's talk about that.
	Uh they did condemn the assassination.
	However, attorney point USA, they added it to its hate map just this year.
	And it says Kirk's goal was to sow fear and division, to destroy our foundational democratic principles and institutions.
	And only hours after he was shot, the SBLC issued an obligatory Mandy Mambi Pambi sort of statement about condemning violence, but then they added that he that uh his he was a conservative leader who profited by spreading hate and division and thrived when our communities are fractured.
	Boy, oh boy.
	Of course, in 2012, you'll remember the attack on the Family Research Council in Washington, D.C., this uh Complete weirdo.
	He carried a pistol and a bag of Chick-fil-A sandwiches.
	He told the FBI he targeted the Family Research Council because it was on SBLC's hate map.
	And he was going to kill everyone in the building and smear Chick-fil-A sandwiches all over their faces.
	And he did that at the time when LGBTQ activists were boycotting Chick-fil-A because it was funding socially conservative causes.
	And of course, the SBLC condemned this act of terrorism, as they call it, but it kept the Family Research Council on its hate map ever since.
	That's in 2012, until the present day in Annodomini, 2025.
	The SBLC put Moms for Liberty on the map.
	It's currently defending itself in court against the Dustin Inman Society, which opposes illegal immigration, but it's an anti-immigrant hate group.
	And it says its map reveals the infrastructure upholding white supremacy.
	Oh boy, oh boy.
	And of course, the Justice Department under uh under Joe Biden thanked the SBLC for its expertise and its pointers that uh they should go after radical traditional Catholics.
	Oh boy, that's an important job for the FBA.
	Well, Mr. Kerzy, our time is up.
	Our time is up.
	And ladies and gentlemen, thank you so much for spending this time with us.
	It is a joy, a pleasure, and an honor.
	And we look forward to speaking with you again next week.

▲