All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 18, 2020 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
52:52
Sam Dickson: "Under Arrest: You've Had Too Much to Think." (2019)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I've known our closing speaker now for, it must be close to 35 years.
And that's more than half my life.
And over the years, my respect and admiration for Sam Dixon has done nothing but grow.
Sam has been working for our people longer than some of you have been alive.
And I won't try to summarize all of the work that he's done for our people, but I will say that he has been the closing speaker at every American Renaissance Conference since the very first one in 1994.
And he has been as faithful to our movement as he has been to American Renaissance.
So it's with great pleasure that I introduce to you my dear friend, Sam Nixon.
Thank you.
Having Jared's friendship is a great, great riches.
I should list it on my financial statement as being of incalculable worth.
And we all are his loyal followers and his admirers.
Someone who has stood the test now for how many years?
About 29 years in the face of endless opposition and upheaval.
I'm virtually the only one left standing in some respect.
So why don't we give a tremendous round of applause to him.
Thank you.
Jared, as most of you know, is a very distinguished person with much to lose.
He did not come to this cause without much to lose, and he has lost substantial amounts by his commitment to our cause, and the cause really of our specific race, but also of civilization of all mankind.
The subject of my talk is, under arrest, you've had too much to think.
And all of us in this room today are...
Thought criminals.
I said at the very first American Renaissance conference that people had asked me what set people like us apart from the norm.
And I said then it was the ability to see things as they are, as opposed to how they are told they are.
Psychiatrists tell us that only 20 to 30 percent of all people are able to change their minds or to Realize that the authorities are not telling the truth or that there's an illogical statement or a contradiction in what they're being told by the people who wear the badges.
There are interesting studies about this.
I don't have time to go into them, but I first learned of them from two Hungarian psychiatrists who had fled Hungary in 1956.
The people in this room clearly are people who can think for themselves.
And who are able to recognize the truth even when the lie is on the throne.
I'm going to tell a couple of personal stories as I begin this talk.
One of them is a life-changing moment for me.
When I was in 11th grade, I had a teacher named Patricia Mason who was a liberal.
She was a real liberal.
She was a tolerant, thoughtful person who believed in freedom of speech, a very admirable woman.
The course was on world history, and she was dealing with the French Revolution.
I happened to have read a lot about the French Revolution.
My grandmother had had in her library a children's book by G.A. Henty called In the Reign of Terror, about a...
Anglo-Saxon boy who's tutored to a French aristocratic family during the French Revolution and who smuggled their children to safety.
And this had fascinated me.
As a child, of course, I was interested in guillotines and so forth.
And I'd read a lot about the French Revolution.
And Ms. Mason said something about some subject in the French, some aspect of the French Revolution.
And I told her politely at the end of class that I thought that it was different.
I had a different thing on it.
And so, she said,"No, I think I'm correct." And we ended the class and we all went home.
The next day, Ms. Mason...
I'm not here.
Yeah, the next day, the teacher was back and she was very formal.
She would start her classes at a podium with a prepared lesson.
And she said that she took role class.
At the end of class yesterday...
We had a discussion about whatever it was, and she said, I went home and checked, and I stand corrected.
Mr. Dixon was right.
I was stunned.
I had hardly ever seen an adult that open to changing her opinion, that you could do it with such grace and ease.
And it went through my mind, that's the kind of person I want to be.
I want to be willing.
To change my mind.
I want to be open to being corrected.
And I have changed my mind in the course of my life on many, many things.
And I discover all the time that some fact that I think is true is untrue.
And it's very important that we do this.
A lot of my talk is going to basically be about bias confirmation.
The way the system and its followers and its dupes deceive people.
And how we are easily deceived by looking only for information that confirms what we already believe, which is basically what the national news media and the government and the deep state, the political police like the FBI, the whole system does this.
And the people who have believed the system probably do this too.
The second vignette, and this is a practical thing, it's the only practical thing in my talk.
I want all of you young people who intend to have children someday, anybody here with a child, any grandparents, listen up, because I think this is an important point.
We look back through childhood to see what affected us, and we look to see how we can help children.
One thing that I think my parents did that was very helpful in causing me to be able to think for myself...
My parents would make explicit the implicit message of advertising.
My parents, as most of you know, were very frugal people.
They're very religious people.
They disliked consumption.
They disliked frivolity.
And they disliked advertising.
Because they felt that it was instigating people to buy things they couldn't afford.
And so there would be something on television or maybe an advertisement in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and they would comment on it.
The one I remember most clearly is the advertisement for bro cream.
Does anybody here remember bro cream?
And in bro cream, for you young people, it was a hair tonic.
And the high school kid would get the Brill Cream, and he'd rub it in his hair, and he'd go to high school, and all the cheerleaders and majorettes would all be throwing themselves at him as he walked down the hall and kissing him.
And my father turned to me and said, Sam, do you think if I buy you some Brill Cream, the majorettes and cheerleaders at Druid Hills High School are going to be throwing themselves at you?
It was so ridiculous that every time I saw a Brill Cream advertisement, it went through my brain.
What a lie it was.
What a deceptive, dishonest thing it was.
It made me permanently resisted.
It inoculated me against advertising.
And I think that's a very useful thing.
So you might consider making explicit the implicit messages of advertising with children because they'll be reminded over and over again of what the message is.
Our enemies are not nice people.
This is a point of difference between me and Jared.
Jared has succeeded in life partly because he is our own Candide.
He is a, what the Germans call a"gut globi." He believes well of people.
He doesn't have my suspicious, hostile personality.
I don't think our enemies are nice people.
Jared thinks they're nice people who are just misled and they can be corrected and made into nice people, period.
I happen to think there's far more criminality than insanity in our enemies.
And they have various ways that they manipulate public opinion.
And I'll be going through that as I go through this talk today.
Originally I intended to focus on things like the de-platforming, the de-YouTubing, the de-Twittering, all the ways that the system is trying to prevent us from using social media to do an end run around the mainstream media's narrative.
But really that's been done a lot and I'm not very good at that because that's not my field as it is with you young folks.
So I'm going to talk instead about a number of things that show how the system manipulates our minds, how they strangle freedom of speech, how they impose their narrative, and show, this would be nothing new to you,
how inconsistent they are, that the rules to these supposedly nice people, the better element, the head table, as I call them, these people don't follow the rules.
And they don't give a damn about fairness.
They don't care about truth.
They have very practical, financial, and racial motives that drive them.
This lady will be well known to many of you here.
It's Heidi Beirich, who works by editing the Hate Watch blog for the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Now, you would think in a free society that the very existence, the very purpose of an organization like the Southern Poverty Law Center would put it under a cloud.
Our enemies, when I was a kid, the professors and teachers all explained that we liberals are in favor of a free and open society.
And that's good.
I'm in favor of that, too.
By the way, I dislike using the word liberal and conservative because I am myself a liberal on many issues, and I think the division of our people into left and right liberal and conservative is really ridiculous and meaningless.
But for the sake of the argument, I'll call it the liberal establishment.
But anyway, they claim to believe in all this free thought.
Well, in the SPLC, you have an organization that is expressly dedicated.
To preventing radical thought from being mainstream.
You know, back in the 1960s and 70s, or the 50s, if you'd had a McCarthyite, conservative, anti-communist organization dedicated to preventing socialists from presenting their ideas, it would have been the subject of ridicule and attack by the media,
as such an organization probably ought to have been.
But this organization is dedicated to thought control.
It's dedicated to punishing thought criminals, to ruining their lives, to preventing them from being heard, from bullying talk show hosts that might have a thought criminal on, things like this.
We have to understand about such people that they are not about love as they claim they are.
There's a great line, I think, from Tennyson,"Envy wears the mask of love." And that's what we're dealing with.
There are people who are envious.
I once talked to somebody who had grown up into communism behind the Iron Curtain.
I remarked that I couldn't imagine how Lenin and other people could believe in Marxism.
You know, Marx is really a crackpot.
I mean, he is really a nutcase.
Some little philosopher with no background in mathematics or science who could sit at his desk and imagine that he has...
Figured out the iron laws of history, and he's able to predict the future and the stages to which mankind will go.
I mean, this is on the level of crystal ball reading.
It's really crackpot stuff, along with a lot of the other stuff that Marx taught.
But anyway, I said, you know, I can't understand how people can believe this.
And this Eastern European said, no one is converted to Marxism.
They are born Marxists.
In Marxism, they are people who are full of hate.
They hate those who are smarter than they are.
They hate those who have something more than they do.
They hate people who are better looking than they are.
They hate people who are better athletes than they are in high school.
The Marxism merely serves as an organizing principle to organize and give superficial objectivity.
To the resentment and hatred that they have.
And I think that's true.
And when you deal with things like the equality religion, which I'll deal with in a few minutes, if you look at it perceptively, you'll see that these are not loving people.
They are people who are full of hate.
And as I will show, you can trace their hatred through oceans of blood.
But this is Heidi Beirich of the Southern Poverty Law Center.
I confess to having a personal animus against the Southern Poverty Law Center.
They're the authors of a smear on me that is factually false.
I don't mind if they want to use their little pet terms.
They have a little shotgun that they apply, regardless of whether all the pellets apply or not.
You're racist, white nationalist, anti-Semitic, homophobic, Holocaust-denying.
Misogynists, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
They have this little shotgun they fire.
Some of these things, they won't say I'm a racist.
That's protected within the bounds of the First Amendment.
They can say that if they want to.
But they make specific factually allegations that are provably false.
They knew they were provably false when they made them.
They certainly know they're provably false now.
But they've had this lie up on me for over 4,000 days.
They have Consciously lied every day that they have had the smear up.
And I do not think that is the behavior of a nice person.
I happen to agree with this.
I think there's a reason why thou shalt not bear false witness was included in the Tenth Commandment.
But our enemies specialize in bearing false witness.
So let's go on and let's look at how the The propaganda system, the narrative is applied by our enemies.
Everybody remember Ted Kaczynski, the Unabomber?
Killed many people mailing bombs, you know?
Do you recall anyone demanding that environmentalist websites be deplatformed?
Were there any journalists who connected the dots like they did with Dylann Roof?
Read some conservative, so-called racist website, and kill some innocent, unoffending black people at Mother Emanuel Church in Charleston.
Certainly something nobody here condones or approves.
That became the excuse for media hysteria to shut down websites, to take down the Confederate flag because...
It was just so clear to people like Anderson Cooper and Michelle Norris and the others in NPR and the New York Times editorial board that this murder committed by this dope addict, disturbed person was caused by the fact that the Council of Conservative Citizens had a website up that dealt with black-on-white crime.
It was just clear to them.
Well, what about Ted Kaczynski?
You know, a murderer.
He undoubtedly read environmentalist propaganda.
Should they be shut down?
The system, of course, doesn't connect the dots there.
That only applies to us.
The rules do not apply.
The rules are applied selectively only to us.
Here is somebody that you've undoubtedly heard of, Heather Heyer, who was tragically killed in Charlottesville.
And again, I think I speak for everyone here when I say that I deplore her death.
She was engaged in activity that was improper.
She was engaged in mob rule designed to prevent American citizens from exercising their First Amendment rights.
But she did not deserve to die.
And we do not condone that.
And we sympathize with her mother and her family for her death.
We do that.
The media, our enemies, will claim they do that.
But let's check and see whether that's true.
Anyone recognize him?
Yes. He's the guy who caused the death of Heather Heyer Fields.
Everybody knows him.
All over the media.
Now what is this other guy?
Does anyone in the room recognize the guy to the right?
Please raise your hand.
I see about 12 hands.
That's the face on the right of Micah Xavier Johnson.
Who murdered five police officers in the course of a Black Lives Matter rally.
The Soros-funded Black Lives Matter movement, which I read in the newspaper, was funded by George Soros to the extent of $32 million.
Did anyone connect any dots on this?
Was there any cry in the media that the Black Lives Matter movement should be shut down, that it should be deplatformed because they were preaching hate against the police?
No. Here are five people whose names you will never have heard.
Michael Kroll, Brent Thompson, Lorne Ahrens, Michael Smith, Patrick Zamarepa.
These are the five police officers who were murdered in the course of the Black Lives Matter movement.
Clearly, clearly murdered.
Not with some degree of possible doubt as in the case of Fields.
Their names are unknown.
There have not been a swarm of lawsuits like there has been in Charlottesville against the Black Lives Matter movement and its leaders and those who were conducting the rally.
And those who financed them, like George Soros.
There have been no conspiracy lawsuits.
There have been no indictments.
The guy, by the way, is dead, so he can't be indicted.
But here again, this is not news to you, but it may be for people who see this online.
If we're allowed to put it up and keep it up online, is the extraordinary difference in treatment between the treatment of the death of one woman at Charlottesville...
And five police officers, at least four of whom were white, one of whom may have been Hispanic, in Dallas, Texas.
Does anyone know who this man is?
Well, I see about two hands.
This is the police chief at Charlottesville, Virginia.
The headline is from the Washington Post.
By the way, there's an old English saying, 100 repetitions make one truth.
And as with most proverbs, it means the opposite.
It means that once a lie has been told a hundred times, people who believe in the truth give up, and the lie becomes accepted.
But the media uses repetition in order to stress things, to stress one thing, and to suppress another.
This article appeared one time.
This story was run one time in the Washington Post.
It was run one time as a minor story in the New York Times.
It was mentioned one time on National Public Radio on All Things Considered.
This is the first African-American police chief at Charlottesville, Virginia.
Now, you've all heard, we've all heard ad infinitum, the system's narrative about Charlottesville.
That it was a bunch of violent, racist, neo-Nazi, homophobic, blah, blah, blah, thugs who sort of like a spaghetti western came into Charlottesville and said,"We're going to take this town.
We're going to just wander around attacking people on the streets." And this is the narrative.
And it culminated, of course, with the death of Heather Heyer, which, by the way, took place two and a half hours after.
The rally had been disbanded and most people had gone home, but it's still said to be part of the rally.
This guy had to resign.
I presume in this room most people know why he had to resign, but the general American public has never been told why he had to resign.
The key question at Charlottesville was who gave the order to the police not to enforce the law?
The failure to enforce the law is really what led to Heather Heyer's death.
If the police had enforced the law and arrested people who were committing crimes, it's very likely Heather Heyer would not have died.
This person is the police chief.
We now know who gave the order not to provide police protection, not to arrest people committing crimes.
He was the one.
And he did so expressly to create a pretext.
To allow crime to grow so as to provide the head table with a pretext to shut down the white rally at the statue of General Lee.
We know that because the city of Charlottesville hired a former federal prosecutor named Timothy Heathie to do an investigation on what went wrong at Charlottesville.
They undoubtedly did not intend this to go the direction it went in.
Maybe Jared is right.
Maybe there are some more honorable and decent people than I think there are in the world.
Mr. Hefe called me and wanted to interview me, and I told him I would not be interviewed, at least not orally, that I would answer questions.
And so I answered his questions, and I sent him a memo.
My default position is, if I'm talking to somebody, that he or she is a straight-up guy or a straight-up girl until I have other reason to believe that he or she is not.
And I said, I'm dubious with you being a hired gun for the city that you're going to be able to produce a genuine report, but we'll see.
Good luck.
But anyway, the guy turned out to be a straight arrow, and he produced the Heafy Report.
And in the Heavey report, he states that not only did this guy order the police not to enforce the law, not to make arrests for people committing crimes, which overwhelmingly were crimes by the Antifa against those people trying to attend the rally.
Overwhelmingly, that was the case.
He also revealed that the police chief had threatened police officers.
And told them not to cooperate in the city's investigation, and above all, not to tell the investigator that he had given the orders not to enforce the law, and not to tell them that he had done so in order to create a pretext to abridge the First Amendment rights of American citizens.
He had to resign.
He was allowed to resign instead of being fired.
You can search the whole history of the civil rights movement in the South.
And you will not find, to my knowledge, any southern sheriff or police chief who ever gave mobs 24 hours free reign to commit crimes against black civil rights demonstrators.
The closest you could come, as a journalist reminded me in a conversation, would be Bull Connor.
But the most Bull Connor is accused of is violation by the police of black people's rights for a short period of time.
Even Bo O'Connor did not unleash mobs of Ku Klux Klansmen on the people of Birmingham.
It remained for this man to do that.
Did you see any outrage reporting about this?
Any demands for federal prosecutions?
No. In fact, the whole story was ignored by the mainstream media.
It was mentioned one time, no 100 repetitions like they've been with Heather Heyer's death.
Mentioned once, dropped.
NPR even featured on All Things Considered an explanation.
They interviewed two African Americans in Charlottesville, one of whom was head of the NAACP chapter, and they just explained that he was being fired because of the white racism that permeated Charlottesville, Virginia, a city that voted 3-1 for Hillary Clinton.
But it doesn't matter.
They can just make up the story as they go along.
But that's quite a story, and it's a story completely ignored by the mainstream media.
You're not going to hear about it from Anderson Cooper.
You're not going to hear about it on NPR.
You're not going to read about it in the New York Times because it doesn't fit the narrative.
They know their narrative is a lie, and they go on saying the lie over and over and over again until 100 repetitions make one truth.
We're all aware of the Antifa and how the system...
It indulges the Antifa.
The Rise Above movement people, you may recall, were arrested for conspiracy to cross state lines to riot.
I think four of them were arrested in California.
This is a group, I'm unfamiliar with it.
Apparently it's vaguely on our side of the political spectrum.
The FBI and the federal prosecutors, to my knowledge, have they ever prosecuted the Antifa for crossing state lines with intent to riot?
I think they may have done it once.
I think some years ago, they may have done it when a group of them attacked a meeting in Chicago.
But the edify is open about its intentions.
You can look on their websites, and they sell guns, they sell knives, they sell locks and explain how to put the locks on chains and swing them and damage people.
They gloat about the crimes they commit against people.
In my own city of Atlanta, they put up a death threat on me.
And they had it up for months.
Sam Dixon deserves to die, and I'm dedicated to bringing this about.
They pinned this comment.
Hey, this is a great idea.
Let's dedicate ourselves to killing Sam Dixon.
FBI? Not interested.
Wrong victim, wrong perp.
But I could go on and on about the crimes of the Antifa committed in the city of Atlanta.
But this is the most dramatic and the most appalling.
In September 2017, The Antifa had a demonstration against so-called police brutality near Georgia Tech.
In the course of their protest, three of the protesters torched a Park City of Atlanta police car through a Molotov cocktail, which exploded, and the car then exploded.
Now, three of them were arrested in the act.
Three arrested.
How many do you think have been prosecuted?
None. Zero.
The district attorney, Paul Howard, an African-American liberal Democrat, has dropped charges against two of them, and the charges have been let to sit for 20 months against the others, and they will, apparently the guy that actually threw the bomb in the presence of the police, and I would lay heavy money.
This person is never, ever going to be prosecuted.
Now, even I, even somebody as unimaginably more negative and pessimistic than our condi, Jared Taylor, Even I thought that if you went around and threw a bomb in a police car, something bad would happen to you.
But not if you're an Antifa.
No, not at all.
The Antifa can get away with virtually anything.
I think if they came and killed me, I think whoever did it would be let off on simple assault and do five hours of community service, and Paul Howard would go have a drink and celebrate.
The standards that are applied, we are always wrong.
Our white, Christian, European people are always wrong on every issue.
I mean no disrespect to Muslims.
I know we have at least one Muslim here, and he's a welcome guest to me.
I think that we have, to a great degree, America in the last 50 years has earned.
The hatred of the Islamic world.
Our behavior has earned us their hatred.
And we can have a way of living with them.
We on our side of the Mediterranean, they on theirs.
So there's plenty of guilt to go around.
But we hear all the time about...
The moralist tolerance of Islam, how in Cordoba, Spain, it was so tolerant.
In Granada, it was so tolerant.
And we hear about Christian intolerance, the sack of Jerusalem, the murder of the Muslim inhabitants of Jerusalem.
Of course, you don't hear about the murder of the Christian inhabitants of Constantinople or anything like that.
But here's the most dramatic.
I go to an Episcopal church when I'm in Key West, and people there are pretty liberal.
There are reasons why I don't go to the Presbyterian Church there.
But they used to have a little group that met on Thursday, a sort of Bible study group.
And one night it started off with a little talk about how guilty we Christians were compared to Muslims, because we were so intolerant.
I try to keep a low profile and not offend people, and I'm very good at offending people.
But anyway, when it finally came around to me, I couldn't control myself, and I asked them if anyone had ever polled the opinions of Armenians on the subject of Islamic tolerance.
And as good liberals generally do, they frowned and changed the subject.
The record turned round and round until the needle hit the obstacle, and rather than deal with the obstacle, the needle hopped over to the next groove.
But so much for fabulous Islamic...
One and a half million Armenians dead in a semi-religious genocide.
There were national reasons, but there were also religious reasons.
Uh-oh.
There. Now, demographic change.
We in this room are concerned at the prospect of white Christians becoming minorities in their own countries.
We look at history, we look at what life is like for white people in South Africa, and we draw conclusions from data.
And that is that the lives of white Christians in America, their standard of living is going to drop drastically if we become a minority.
We, of course, are shamed and attacked as haters and racists.
We must be deplatformed.
We must be denied any hearing.
But in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution about two weeks ago, we saw this.
Suddenly, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution is passionately concerned.
About demographic change.
And they can understand the anger of people who are being displaced and replaced.
This involves the fact that there are in-town neighborhoods where white people are moving in.
Now, to the Atlanta General Constitution, this is completely understandable that black people would be enraged that white people would move in next door.
But it's not understandable.
There's no excuse for people like us who don't want our nation lost.
Clearly, people that write this kind of thing have no intention of applying the rules fairly.
The rules are applied only against us, and the rules change according to whether it's us or them.
And we need to have no respect for them, and they are not people of goodwill.
Drastic demographic change throughout all history has caused violence.
I'm not happy about that.
If I were God...
I would have done a better job at creating the world.
The liberal theologians in my church, they all feel they're nicer than God.
They can change all the historic teachings of the church because they're better than God.
They do a better job than God.
And I can understand, if I were the creator of the world, I would have created a world in which there would be no violence, and demographic change would not bring violence.
But I'm not God, and He doesn't really care what my opinion is.
And I'm not creating the world.
And so I accept the world the way it is.
And I draw conclusions from data.
And the data is that, as with diversity, drastic demographic change breeds war and violence.
It's always been that way.
And we see that.
This is a picture of King Philip.
King Philip was the leader of the Indian tribes in the Bay Colony of Massachusetts.
And he resented immigrants.
He was xenophobic.
He hated immigrants.
He was full of racism and prejudice against immigrants.
And he was able, when he surprise attacked them, he was able to wipe out one-third of all the Puritan settlements in Massachusetts.
But nobody will ever judge King Philip.
Including me.
I mean, as a white person, a white Christian trying to be objective, I can understand why he was not in a good mood.
But if it's a terrible thing, you know, it is a terrible thing.
What happened in Christchurch, New Zealand, is a terrible thing.
But to think that things like this happen because Jared Taylor is able to put a speech up on YouTube is not merely childish.
It's a lie.
And they know it's a lie.
When you have this kind of drastic demographic change, there is going to be violence.
And we have barely even begun to see it.
You see it in Paris and in London, where immigrants drive cars down the street and go up on the sidewalk and kill 20 and 30 people at a time.
But that doesn't elicit the same kind of response that Christchurch New Zealand elicited.
In fact, There's a template to how such stories are reported.
And when they commit crimes, the template is the real danger here is that it might cause people to oppose immigration and be racist.
That's the real problem when 20 or 30 people are killed by a terrorist in Florida, in a homosexual bar in Florida, or on the sidewalks of London or Paris.
That's their template for reporting that.
The template for us is that everybody in this room is guilty for what Fields did in Charlottesville or what Dylannroof did in Charleston.
That's the template they use for us.
Do you think they're being honest?
No. This is a picture of the marker at the Long Canes Massacre back in my own area of the country in South Carolina.
It's over the graves of my ancestors who were murdered by racist, xenophobic Cherokee Indians who brutally scalped them.
The Calhouns, the grandparents of John C. Calhoun.
Brutally scalped, their children killed, left to linger for hours in agony by racist, xenophobic Indians.
Now, I say that, of course, tongue-in-cheek.
I can understand the Indians.
I'm not interested in getting reparations from the Indians.
I'm not interested in perpetuating hatred of Indians.
I come from a race of people that created reservations for the vanquished Indian tribes, which they never did for each other before the white man came.
The Cherokees did not create reservations for the mound builders.
They simply wiped them out.
But we don't get judged by that standard.
We're always wrong.
Here's another one that is involved with drastic...
Rapid demographic change.
This is the Deir Yassin massacre in 1948.
And this involved the change of Palestine from majority Arab to majority Jewish.
And here again, several hundred Arabs were murdered by a group called the Irgun.
They were an extremist Jewish group.
Headed by a guy whose name you will know.
That man's name is Menachem Begin, who went on to be Prime Minister of Israel.
Let me read you.
There was no concern for Menachem Begin about the 200 men, women, and children massacred at Deir Yassin.
In fact, far from it.
His reaction to what his troops had done.
It was very different from the reaction of most of us who deplore what happened at Christ Church, New Zealand.
And this is from Wikipedia, amazing enough.
Beguine told his soldiers that this civilian massacre was a splendid act of conquest that would serve as a model for the future.
He told his commanders, tell the soldiers you have made history.
In Israel, with your attack and your conquest, continue this until victory.
As in Deir Yassin, so everywhere.
We will attack and smite the enemy.
Lord, thou hast chosen us for conquest.
But this is the kind of horrific thing that happens when you have drastic demographic change.
And those who don't want the kind of things like Christ Church should consider whether diversity leads to peace and harmony and happiness, the way we're told, or whether it leads, like it does in Northern Ireland and Lebanon and Sri Lanka and Burma,
to unhappy things.
And now we come to the equality crusade.
I despise equality.
I can say truthfully, I don't think there's ever been a moment of my life that I ever believed in equality.
I don't believe in the tooth fairy.
I believed in it when I was a child, but I came to see better that there is no tooth fairy.
In equality, you only wonder, what was Jefferson smoking when he wrote those words, that all men are created equal?
Obviously. No one has ever been equal to anyone else.
No individual, not even identical twins are equal.
No race is equal.
No tree is equal.
No snowflake is equal.
Nor do I think, a lot of people say, well, it's a noble thing to wish people were equal.
No, I don't think that either.
I think when you're in high school, as I've said before, you want your team to be the best in the league.
You don't want it to be the most equal in the league.
The desirable goal is excellence.
That is the desirable goal.
And it is excellent people who help humanity.
It wasn't an equal person.
It wasn't an equal person who created the polio vaccine that freed us all from the scourge of polio.
It will not be an equal person who will cure AIDS.
Progress is made by unequal, exceptional people who are entitled to our admiration and gratitude and respect, and not to our hatred because they're better than us, as Heidi Beirich and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders and Liz Warren,
who are full of hatred of excellent people and want to equalize everybody.
The desire for equality appears to be this weird idea.
It's rooted in our own national history, but there's an amusing thing out of Greek mythology, the bed of Procrustes.
There's a white Russian I knew who wrote an excellent book, unfortunately only in French, called La Lille de Procruste, the bed of Procrustes, which deals with the whole issue of equality.
Procrustes loved humanity in mythology.
He loved people, and he liked to entertain them, and he wanted them to be happy when they came to his house.
And he had a bed for them where they could spend the night, and it disturbed him that sometime their legs were too long and stuck out, and they were uncomfortable.
And so he would chop their legs off so that they would be comfortable and would fit the bed.
And if they were too short, he wanted them to fit, so he had a rack where he would stretch them out.
But he loved humanity, and he wanted everyone to be equal.
And he was sort of a mythological precursor.
To Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders and their followers.
Now, how many people here have not heard of the Katin massacre?
How many of you have not heard?
Well, about a fourth of the audience.
I'm always astonished as I talk to young people and I realize that what's natural to us is unknown to them.
And I'm not criticizing them.
It's the way life is.
It was the same way for me when I was young.
These are people who were murdered in the name of equality.
They were murdered by a great fighter for equality named Joseph Stalin as part of his program to bring the blessings of equality to the world.
These are the bodies of Polish army officers.
And in World War II, when the Soviet Union invaded eastern Poland, they took the officer corps of the Polish nation and they murdered them.
Because as good communists, as well as, of course, worry about opposition from nationalists from Poland, but as good communists, they knew that these people had officer privilege, and they needed to be punished.
They were class enemies.
Stalin had a lot of training in this.
After all, he and Lenin had massacred the Russian aristocracy, which was a criminal caste that produced people like Tchaikovsky and Dostoevsky and Tolstoy, and therefore had to be eliminated because to have...
People that are excellent and superior, according to Lenin, you know, hurt the proletariat.
And he was going to get rid of people like that.
And they killed millions of them.
They carried it so far that a few years before they massacred and murdered the Polish Army officer corps, they massacred millions of peasants in Russia who were kulaks.
That is, a peasant who knew a little bit better, a little bit better farmer, and had two cows instead of one.
Generally conceded that the murders ranged between as little as 3 million, maybe 10 million, but you had to have equality.
You had to end Kulak privilege and achieve equality.
And so when these poor guys fell into Stalin's hands, they were taken out and killed.
It's interesting that we know the name of the person who probably has the place in history, you know, the record on killing people.
His name was Vasily Blochin, and he was one of the NKVD officers who personally killed these officers.
They were taken from where they were in detention, handcuffed, and then made to kneel away from the others where people wouldn't know what was going on.
And Blochin would then shoot them in the back of the head.
And we have the skulls that were recovered with the bullet holes in the back of the head.
Blachin was a sensitive person.
He complained when they started shooting them.
As an NKVD officer, he had a Soviet-made weapon.
And the recoil was so great that it made his hands hurt.
So, thoughtfully, he was provided with a German revolver so that his hands wouldn't hurt.
But he's estimated to have personally killed 7,000 Polish officers, and he died comfortably in his bed.
And his crime, by the way, was blamed by Churchill and Roosevelt and Stalin, not, of course, on the NKVD, but on the Germans.
And at Nuremberg, the American and British judges sat like little dumb Indians while the Soviets accused the Germans of committing a crime that the Americans and British knew they had not committed, but had been perpetrated by their glorious allies in the Soviet Union.
Roosevelt went to extreme lengths to try to suppress this story.
There was a fellow that did a study for it for the government named Earl.
Roosevelt suppressed the study and exiled him to Samoa to get him out of the way where the truth would not be known about the Communists, and Roosevelt could go on giving his fireside chats to the American people, assuring us that there was complete freedom of religion in the Soviet Union because the Soviet Constitution said so.
Roosevelt has his face on the dime.
It's not like Lee.
No one's talking about taking Roosevelt off the dime, but Lee's statue has to come down.
Does that seem like fair play to you?
Now, here is the most modern, the latest implementation of equality.
And that was by somebody who believed in equality named Pol Pot in Cambodia.
He believed passionately in equality and wanted to bring the blessings of equality to mankind.
And so he set up the killing fields.
And this is a picture of some of the skulls and bodies recovered from mass murders made in the name of equality by Pol Pot.
And finally, not to pick on the foreigners and the Zionists and the Muslims and others, we have our own homegrown American, the Reverend Jim Jones.
This is also something that is not talked about very much in America, although a lot of people remember it, but the mainstream media doesn't talk about it.
Jim Jones was a prominent fighter against white racism and for equality, so much so that Rosalind Carter befriended him and had her picture taken to show her support of Jones.
There's a very great book I recommend to you, it's been remaindered, called The Road to Jonestown.
You really should read it.
It's a microcosm for everything that's going on in our country today because all the ingredients were there.
The suppression of criticism of Jones, the punishment, the doxing of people who defected from Jones, who tried to tell people what Jones was up to, the people who knowingly went along with Jones, knowing that he was a liar.
He would perform fake miracle cures in which he would cure people of cancer, and they supposedly would excrete the cancer.
Some chicken entrails would be carried around the congregation as the cancer that the cancer victim supposedly had been cured of.
And you had Harvard Law graduates who played along with this, knowing it was a lie.
But hey, when you're fighting for equality, little things like facts and truth don't matter.
So why let them get in the way?
And that really is the Anderson Cooper approach, the CNN approach, the New York Times approach to what we have today.
And of course, this is where it ended.
This is an aerial photograph of some of the hundreds of bodies of these people who committed suicide or who were murdered by Jones and his henchmen.
Some of them wouldn't take the Kool-Aid, so they were forcibly injected or shot.
And this is really where equality ends up.
There was a journalist who asked me here about freedom of speech, that isn't it a concern that certain ideas will lead sort of unavoidably to crimes?
And, you know, the fact is, our ideas do not lead unavoidably to crimes.
Our ideas lead to peace between people because they're not forced together, and everyone is allowed to have his own country.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Our ideas are in accordance with fact and nature and truth.
The Crusade for Equality...
It's contrary to fact.
It's contrary to truth.
And it unavoidably will have to end up in the Coutines Forest or the decalachization or the guillotines in the streets of Paris or Jonestown.
And that's where we're headed, ultimately.
If people like those of us in this room are not able to have our say and to lead our people out of this nightmare, it's going to be Jonestown from coast to coast.
Now here's what my helpers, the young guys in AIM, who helped me put these things together, told me that there sure are a lot of corpses in this presentation.
It sure is a grim ending to a meeting.
It's not exactly uplifting.
So I kind of grafted on this ending.
But here are three heroes of ours.
Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, and Robert E. Lee.
Unlike Roosevelt, none of them can be accused of the kind of crime that Roosevelt committed at Cateen.
In hiding and suppressing the Cattin Massacre and falsely blaming the Germans.
You know, I think everyone concedes, on a personal level, these were honorable men.
It's interesting to note that if Thomas Jefferson were alive today, Heidi Beirich would identify him as a hater.
And he would be deplatformed.
He couldn't have a Facebook account.
That's the kind of Jonestown-esque, nutcase country that we live in.
And this is what we strive for, not equality, but excellence and beauty.
Thank you.
This is our heritage, the Parthenon, a building of unequaled beauty and serenity, still at the top of the Acropolis in Athens, representing what excellent people can achieve,
and for which we are grateful.
I'll close by quoting something that a young doctor I know in Mississippi told me the other day that struck me.
He said he was under attack by the Antifa who were trying to get him fired from his hospital.
Nice people.
He said,"I am what I am supposed to be." And that's what we are.
We are who we are supposed to be.
We are the people who are doing the right thing.
We are the people who create things like The Parthenon, as opposed to the Jonestown massacre and the Catine Forest murders.
That is the difference between us and them.
That's not in their narrative, but that is the difference.
And it is in our hands, the hands of you young folks here, to see that we do not become a Jonestown from coast to coast, as we will if the equality fanatics have their way.
And to lead our people not merely back to where they were.
But the ever greater triumphs, which is our destiny.
▲
Export Selection