All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 4, 2020 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
42:47
Jared Taylor: "Irreconcilable Differences: We Need A Divorce" (2018)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
My name is Jared Taylor, and I'm the editor of American Renaissance.
And today I'd like to speak about irreconcilable differences, or why we need a divorce.
Well, black people and white people have been trying to live together on this continent, at least North America, for 399 years.
Tomorrow, next year, it will be 400 years.
And I don't think the experience can be called a success.
In South Africa, black people and white people have been trying to live together for 366 years, and I don't consider that a success either.
There are a lot more recent attempts at this kind of cohabitation in Canada and Europe and in many different places around the world, and I don't think there's a single one in which it can be called a real success.
Well, frankly, I don't think it's going to work.
And we should stop trying to make it work.
If this were a marriage, it would be considered a case of irreconcilable differences between the two parties, and that would be grounds for divorce.
In the United States, historically, we've had a number of systems.
We've tried various ways of trying to make things work together, and they haven't worked together.
We've had slavery.
We had Reconstruction, Jim Crow, segregation.
All of these were clumsy, deeply unsatisfactory attempts to arrange a system whereby two races that were unlike each other would try to live in the same territory.
Now these, of course, were hierarchical systems, and they are generally considered profoundly unjust and even barbaric, but that's not a universal view.
The black author Zora Neale Hurston Who died in 1960, famously said that slavery is the price I paid for civilization.
Hurston, by the way, thought that what blacks should do is work hard rather than ask for handouts from white people.
And 80 years ago, she had a name for black people who thought otherwise and thought that they should make a living out of victimhood.
She called those people the sobbing school of Negrohood.
Well, today we have a regime in which we live under presumed equality and equal treatment, but the sobbing school of Negrohood is still going very strong.
And according to the sobbing school, the key for progress for black people is not necessarily to work hard.
The key to progress is blaming whites.
Whites must purge themselves of unearned privilege, unconscious bias, microaggressions, cultural appropriations, or whatever else is the latest sin that we are committing, and only then will blacks enjoy the success that they deserve.
Well, a hundred years ago, at a time when blacks faced genuine legal obstacles to success, People who are, unfortunately, now discredited, such as Booker T. Washington and Marcus Garvey, were saying the solution was hard work.
And since then, there have been countless laws and regulations that have eliminated every single possible legal barrier to black advancement, and we've gotten to the point where anything that is not equal results is prima facie grounds for assuming there's some kind of illegal discrimination.
People like Washington and Garvey and people of their era would be astonished by affirmative action and white guilt and set-asides and role models and safe spaces and trigger warnings.
All of this they could never have imagined.
And if there ever was a United States in which black people could move forward and succeed by hard work, surely it's today's America.
And there is, I'm sure, no project into which Americans have poured more moral energy into than the idea of equal rights for blacks.
I don't think probably in the history of the world any people has done so much mentally, psychologically, and in terms of material resources in an attempt to achieve some kind of equality.
And yet, the easier things get for black people in the United States, the more they seem to complain.
Black people at Ivy League universities must be the most petted and coddled black people in the history of the world.
And yet, they cling to denounce and find and denounce white supremacy at every turn.
Entrenched white supremacy.
It seems to me if you can find entrenched white supremacy at Yale and Princeton, you can find it on the moon.
But of course, a big part of the problem is this unquestioned assumption ever since maybe the 1950s that blacks and whites are completely, mathematically, across the board, equal in every way.
And therefore, if blacks don't do as well as whites, the only possible explanation can be this entrenched white supremacy.
Or cultural bias or appropriation or unconscious this and that or whatever new defect we have.
And the fact is blacks are far behind.
And so it must be that whites must be secretly even more vicious than anybody could have imagined back in the 1950s.
The odd thing is though that actual white viciousness is so difficult to find.
Where are the white people who make black people shoot each other?
And give them a 72% illegitimacy rate and ensure that they somehow fail their exams and go to jail at seven times the white rate.
And if white people are responsible for all this, surely there must be some villains out there who are making it happen.
But where are these oppressors?
For there to be institutional or unconscious racism, there's got to be racism.
The hunt is always on.
We must find racists.
And so, we come up with people like George Zimmer.
Or we come up with people like Darren Wilson, who used to be a police officer.
And now, this desperate search for the great white racist has found its latest victim.
That, of course, is Holly Hilton.
As you recall, she used to work for Starbucks.
And I think she's probably going to have to change her name if she's ever going to work for anybody else again.
But when you look closely at what these great white racists did, often you find that the closer you look, the less explicable this becomes.
They didn't do much that appears to be wrong.
Of course, these incidents have to be nationally used, and they have to be examples of efficiencies because there has to be white racism for...
There to be black failure.
But of course, these things to be described in any way that could explain black failure, they have to be described dishonestly.
About a week after this famous Starbucks incident, the New York Times was writing about it this way, and I quote, talking about arrests of two black patrons while they were simply waiting for a meeting to begin.
Arrested just for waiting.
This is how the New York Times is describing that incident.
Well, let's say you go into a store with a no-lawyering policy white man and you ask to use the restroom and you're told that it's for clients only.
And someone asks you to purchase something and you refuse.
And then you're asked, well, if you're not going to buy anything, would you kindly leave?
And you refuse.
The police come and say, You're not buying anything.
Please go.
And again, you refuse.
And you get arrested.
Would any white person expect any kind of sympathy for anybody under those circumstances?
I think the answer is clearly no.
But when a black person does these things and gets arrested, the NAAC officially calls it, and I quote, another ominous signal of the increasingly dangerous environment for African Americans.
We need a divorce.
Or, well now, could this marriage be saved?
Could we do more for black people?
Well, Chanel Helm sure thinks so.
Does anyone remember Chanel Helm?
Not a well-informed audience.
She is a Black Lives Matter organizer in Louisville, Kentucky.
And she has advice for us that she has written out in some detail.
She says, white people?
If you're inheriting property you intend to sell, give it to a black or brown family.
You're bound to make that money back in some white-privileged way.
And she also writes, white people?
Re-budget your monthly expenses so you can donate to black funds.
She has a whole host of other suggestions for us that all boil down to hand it over.
But she's just trying to make the marriage work.
Well, now, you could argue that Chanel Helm is just one goofy black woman who speaks only for herself and that she can be ignored.
But I don't think that you can say the same for Ta-Nehisi Coates.
He's probably the most famous black author writing today.
And here's my favorite passage from Ta-Nehisi Coates.
Many passages that are similar.
He writes this.
I would like to tell you that a day approaches when the people who believe themselves to be white renounce this demon religion of white supremacy and begin to think of themselves as human.
But I see no real promise of such a day.
He thinks we're never going to give up our demon religion of white supremacy and just act like human beings.
Isn't he saying the marriage can't be saved?
And here's a black American.
I don't know if that's a real name or one of these newly fashioned African-style names, but in any case, she recently wrote an article for the New York Times with a title,"Can my children be friends with white people?" And in the New York Times,
she wrote,"I will teach my boys to have profound doubts that friendship with white people is possible.
You just can't trust those people." Now, here is Erin Kaplan, who is a regular opinion page contributor to the Los Angeles Times.
She lives in Inglewood, which is near the Los Angeles airport, and she discovered that her overwhelmingly black neighborhood is attracting white settlers.
Now, how'd she react to that?
I felt a rush of resentment.
We will lose our space.
It's a warning that my black community is once again irretrievably at risk.
Clearly, she doesn't want us around.
And if a white person would write that way about any other racial group, wouldn't it be called, dare I call it, hate?
Well, Tracy Clayton is another black person, and she writes for BuzzFeed.
And in 2015, she wrote an article called, 29 Things White People Ruined.
Well, number 29 is basically everything.
In case she'd forgotten anything in the first 28, number 29, the conclusion was basically everything.
We ruined it.
And here's Assad Hader.
He's of Middle Eastern origin, but he seems to adopt the minority view really quite rapidly.
And let me quote from him.
He says, Difficult as it is for people of color like me to come to terms with, we're not about to get rid of white people.
This country is full of them.
They are an intrinsically reactionary force.
The relevant question is how to subdue this reactionary force.
So here's an immigrant that comes to the country, and he's dismayed to find that it's full of white people.
He can't think of some practical way to get rid of us, but eventually they're going to subdue us.
I wonder how they plan to do that.
And, of course, Hispanics have been getting in on this act for quite some time.
Rudy Martinez of Texas State University, I think some of you saw the article that he wrote for his school paper, and the title was, Your DNA is an Abomination.
Well, that's our DNA, of course.
And his message for white people, I hate you because you shouldn't exist.
Well, surprisingly, there was actually some criticism.
Of this column at campus, and the editor of the school paper, another Hispanic, printed an apology.
And she conceded, we acknowledge that the column could have been clearer.
Could have been clearer in his message.
Well, I don't see how it could have been any clearer than, I hate you because you shouldn't exist.
Anyway, now here's another Hispanic professor, an Albert Ponsing, writing about what he calls the abolition of white democracy.
Which he says is just another name for white supremacy.
He writes this.
Abolition means we must destroy white democracy, not reform it.
No voting is going to help.
We need to smash white supremacy.
Now, there is plenty more of this kind of thing.
It doesn't take much effort to find sentiments of this kind percolating through the internet and in places like the New York Times.
And I honestly don't know how representative it is.
Some people might say, this is just crazy intellectual stuff.
These people don't speak for the mass of blacks or Hispanics.
However, have you ever heard a non-white person say, actually, I kind of like white people.
I think white people are really working hard to establish an equal society.
Have you ever heard any of them, even one of them, say such a thing?
I haven't.
And I would note that we get this kind of spiteful talk about us while we are still the majority.
I mean, when Ta-Nehisi Coates and people like him become the majority, I don't think they're suddenly going to decide that white people aren't so bad after all.
And once they're in charge, I think they probably will come up with imaginative ways to, as they say, subdue us.
There is a certain logic in what these people are doing.
They want what I have, what we have.
And it makes sense for them to describe us in these abominable terms because it justifies their taking what we have, whether it's our wealth, whether it's our culture, whether it's our country.
We're a reactionary force.
Our DNA is an abomination.
We can't be trusted.
We have a demon religion.
All of that makes sense.
For people who want what we have.
Well, okay, they're not fond of us.
They want to dispossess us.
There's nothing unusual in that.
People have been wanting what other folks had ever since there have been people.
This is part of the human condition.
But this attempt for us to live with black people has produced a much more mystifying and surprising consequence, and that is that it produces mental illness in white people.
For example, what are we to make to the millions of white people who adore Ta-Nehisi Coates and have made him a millionaire as a consequence of his contempt for us?
And here's a fellow, a white person, by the name of Frank Joyce, who writes regularly for Salon.com, and here's the title of one of his columns, White Men Must Be Stopped, The Very Future of Mankind Depends On.
As he writes, the future of life on the planet depends on bringing the 500-year rampage of the white man to a halt.
Now, guess what he says.
The central problem is white supremacy.
And he goes on to say, white racism distorts how we think about virtually everything.
Now, white people wouldn't write this kind of craziness if they were not trying to live in a multiracial society.
But because we are.
Engaged in this ill-fated and futile attempt to live together, we find white people saying all kinds of crazy things.
For example, the First Amendment has got to be amended so there can be no more hate speech, which is to say anything that might hurt the feelings of a non-white person.
There are lots of white people out there who think that just about everything that is said at this conference from Professor Whitman on down has all been hate speech and, in fact, it should be banned by law.
A lot of them think that.
And they would not turn into these obscurantist censors if it were not for this crazy attempt to build a multiracial society.
And some of the stuff just gets downright calm.
There are white people who will tell you that farmers' markets are racist.
The scientific method is racist.
Objective qualifications for jobs are racist.
Math is Eurocentric and has to be modified.
Again, you wouldn't get this kind of spectacular foolishness.
If we lived in a racially coherent society.
Now, I have a name for this new mental disease that I've discovered.
I think we should call it race-induced cognitive disorder.
And it is unique to white people.
And I have a number of favorite patients who suffer from this disease, one of whom is George W. Bush.
And you will recall that after Hurricane Katrina, There were some complaints about how he didn't get federal aid down there in time to New Orleans.
Kanye West got on television and called him a racist for not having hustled down there quick enough.
Well, after his terms as president were over, George W. Bush, looking back on those eight years, said that was the worst moment of his entire presidency.
Now, here's a guy who was president during the 2001 terror attacks.
He led the country.
Into the worst recession since the great crisis of the 20s.
He's the guy who got us into this utterly pointless, expensive, crazy war in Iraq.
All of these things he went through, but for some tin pot entertainer to call him a racist was the worst experience in his entire presence.
This is a form of insanity.
And of course the latest example of how this project of multiracialism unhinges the minds of whites.
We'll be on spectacular coast-to-coast display on May 29th, just one month from now, when Starbucks closes all 8,000 of its stores so that 175,000 employees can spend an afternoon having white privilege and white guilt shoved down their throats.
Now, this is going to cost them an estimated $12 million in lost revenue, and I'm sure it's going to be a very pleasant payday.
For Eric Holder and for Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL who are going to help design this curriculum to help white people overcome their unconscious stereotypes.
But there's an aspect of this I just don't understand.
Isn't the whole idea of unconscious bias and sensitivity training to overcome stereotypes of this kind so that we can see Muslims commit terrorist acts time after time after time, but We know better than to conclude that this says anything in general about Islam.
We have to overcome that stereotype.
And blacks may be arrested at 12 to 15 times the white rate for mugging, but if we find ourselves in a black neighborhood and watch our backs, that's a stereotype we must overcome.
Overcoming stereotypes is what we're put on earth to do.
However... Just one manager at Starbucks, allegedly, says does something bad.
Let's assume she does something.
Just one.
And that means that all 175,000 employees have to go through all this anti-stereotyping.
Now, do I detect some kind of stereotype here?
Just one manager does something allegedly wrong, and all of them, all of them might be bad.
Every single white person might be bad.
Exercise in fighting stereotypes is nothing more than an affirmation, a huge, deafening affirmation of the one remaining negative stereotype that is acceptable, which is the racist white person.
Now, Starbucks management probably can't even begin to understand this because it has to do with this tragic, ill-fated attempt on which we've launched to build a multiracial society.
When it comes to race, Otherwise, intelligent people behave like morons.
There's another problem.
And that has to do with the fact that as we keep going down this road to nowhere, trying to make something work that does not work, we find we have to jettison standards that white people take for granted because blacks and Hispanics are not able or refuse to live up to those standards.
I mean, there are lots of little examples around the country.
Take a fair beating.
Jumping the turns down on the subway.
Turns out, it was just announced recently that in New York City, 90% of the people who get arrested for this are black or Hispanic.
Oh gosh, we can't have that.
Must be more stereotyping.
So the solution, the solution is to make fair bidding no longer an arrestable offense.
And that is precisely what Cyrus Vance, District Attorney of Manhattan, has announced in February that he's going to do.
There may be civil summonses, but no more arrests because we were arresting too many non-whites.
In 2016, California decriminalized Fair Beating for anyone under age 18. San Francisco did the same thing in 2008.
Seattle in 2015.
In every case, the reason was we cannot have rules and enforce rules if the people who are punished for violating these rules are overwhelmingly non-white.
And here's another example.
Everyone knows that blacks and Hispanics get school discipline at far higher rates than whites.
Well, Barack Obama and Eric Holder concluded that there was only one explanation to this, and this is racism.
And, as you may recall, he issued this dear colleague letter to all the people who run all the school districts in America threatening to withhold federal funds if people had these disparate discipline rates, which is to say, every school district.
Well, that's why in 2009, St. Paul, Minnesota, they decided they were going to solve the problem by hiring somebody named Valeria Silva as the superintendent of schools.
She put everybody through sensitivity training, and she issued orders from on high.
Those discipline rates could not vary according to race.
So what's the solution?
You can't start suspending white people for no reason at all, so you end up stopping.
Black and Hispanic suspensions stopped suspending them for even the best of reasons.
And what are the consequences?
Of course, chaos.
Teachers going to the emergency room, an utterly ungovernable classroom, one after another.
And what this led to was a citizen revolt.
They had to vote in a brand new school board, which finally, after six and a half years of misery, fired Valeria Silva, and they got disciplined back in their schools again.
Of course, it cost them $800,000 to buy out Valeria Silva's contract, but it was worth it to be able to discipline with racial disparity once again and have schools at work.
There were similar stories all around the country, but the idea was blacks and Hispanics can't follow the rules, so ditch the rules.
And we all remember Nicholas Cruz, who killed 17 people in Parkland, Florida.
He was, of course, part of what they called The promise program.
The idea was we're just not going to report crimes to the police because we want to stop the school to prison pipeline that is another notorious black mark of America.
So despite the fact that he had crimes, he'd committed crimes, he wasn't reported to the police, he didn't have a criminal record, was able to buy a gun, and as a consequence, 17 people dead.
But now we're not talking about racial disparities of any kind.
We're talking about gun control.
That's... The obvious solution, because when it comes to race, otherwise intelligent people, as I said before, act like morons.
Then, another example of this is the 2008 financial crisis.
President George Bush, some years previously, had decided that blacks and Hispanics were not getting the mortgages they deserved.
And so, to make sure that they did, bankers were essentially ordered to jump the usual credit-worthy standards.
But, if you were going to give mortgages, To blacks or Hispanics that were not going to make a down payment, who had no obvious or provable source of income, you couldn't turn away white deadbeats either.
And as a consequence, no surprise, there was lots of defaults.
And what we know as the minority mortgage meltdown, of course, is studiously ignored in all other circles.
One last example.
The University of Virginia, ever since its founding, has had an honor code.
You're not allowed to lie, cheat, or steal, and such people are supposed to be expelled.
One student reported to the school newspaper, most of my African-American friends view the honor system as something negative, almost like a boogeyman to be afraid of.
Well, as it turns out, blacks are about five times more likely to violate the honor system.
And interestingly enough, Asians aren't all that honorable either by UVA standards.
And so the question always keeps coming up.
Is the honor system, because of this disparate impact, an antiquated, racist, white supremacist thing?
Well, it survives now, but we'll see how much longer.
And so, to conclude, in this attempt to build a multiracial country, there have been many, many unfortunate, even tragic consequences, and I've talked only about three.
First, there's this growing number of non-whites who...
Hate us.
And if they hate us in the America of 2018, they are always going to hate us.
They are not going to ever be happy with us.
Second, is this attempt to build a multi-racial society drives a certain number of white people literally insane, like the people who run Starbucks.
And third, we are bit by bit beginning to dismantle the standards by which we run our societies.
But standards that others are not able to meet.
So what do we do?
Well, first of all, the non-whites who complain about us so bitterly, if they had any integrity, they would be asking for a divorce.
Tanahisi Koch says we're hopeless.
Ikaw Yanka tells her children we can't be trusted.
Asad Haider would love to get rid of us.
Don't they have the courage of their convictions?
Why aren't they asking for separation?
And for all these Black Lives Matter people who claim to believe that white people are just white police officers just cruising around their neighborhoods looking for black people to shoot, why aren't they asking for separation?
And I don't mean safe spaces for people of color and blacks only dormitories that we have to pay for.
Anyway, I'm talking about the real thing.
Parts of states, parts of the country, a fair division, where they could run the schools and the police departments, and where they wouldn't have to worry about white people ever again.
Wouldn't that be paradise for them?
Well, why don't they ever ask for this paradise?
Well, I suspect Ta-Nehisi Coates would miss getting his royalty payments.
I think he'd probably have nothing to write about if he weren't living with us.
And if the people of color had their own places, it wouldn't be just the schools and the police force they'd have to run.
Somebody would have to keep the electrical grid functioning and keep the bridges from falling down.
And white people are kind of handy for that kind of thing.
And so I think in their bones, they know they are much better off keeping us around to play certain roles.
We, though, we should take them at their word.
We should be saying, if we are really as awful as you say, let's figure out some way for you to live apart from us.
You say that we keep you on the plantation?
Well, go plant your own plantation and take your destiny in your own hands.
Now, so far, I've been looking at race relations from the point of view of non-whites.
Now, that's the way we do it in this country, of course.
We always have to ask ourselves, what are their reasons?
What can we do for them?
How must we change ourselves in order to make them happy?
Well, if we listen to what non-whites are saying now, it's pretty clear that nothing we can do is going to make them happy.
Shutting down 8,000 Starbucks for an afternoon, that may give them some sense of momentary, vindictive pleasure, but it's not going to make them happy.
They say we are a curse upon them and an obstacle to their happiness.
Well, we have a solution.
If we make them miserable, let us go our own ways.
But then, let's do something really radical.
Let's think about our happiness.
For at least half a century, we've been worrying exclusively about how to make everybody else happy.
Can we pause for a moment and think about us?
Well, doesn't it turn out that our happiness is exactly the same as for everyone else, living apart so that we can be ourselves in a society that reflects our values and our aspirations?
What a relief it would be to turn our backs on this exhausting, humiliating, futile project of endless apology and accommodation.
Blacks clearly don't have the courage and integrity to ask for separation.
But that's the only logical solution for their ever-growing list of grievances.
And for us, it's absolutely essential.
We live on an increasingly non-white planet as a small minority, and everywhere white people face dispossession.
Now, the non-whites who live among us, they think we're horrible and incorrigible.
I keep wondering, why don't they tell the non-whites who don't yet live among us how awful we are and warn them to stay away?
Somehow they don't ever do that.
And as they continue to come, we will eventually be swamped.
Those of us in viciously racist America and hopelessly racist Europe, we still attract millions of people who, once they're here, are going to despise us.
So, for us, separation is survival.
Ultimately, of course, we want all people to live in communities and nations that reflect their values and their heritage.
We want people of all races to be the best they can be according to their own traditions, not to be crammed together, constantly jockeying for position in some multi-cult society that satisfies nobody.
Yes, whether others say so or not, We want separation, we require separation, but we want nothing for ourselves that we're not happy to grant to others.
Of course, we live in an astonishing time in which to express this simple and natural desire is practically a criminal act.
Now, I would like to conclude with something inspiring, but if I really think about what we owe our ancestors and the obligation that we have to our descendants, I will be unable to...
Maintain my composure.
So rather than weep into this microphone, which is something that some of you have seen before, I will say only that it is our duty, your duty, to ensure that we have a future that is bright and as promising as our past has been glorious.
This is our struggle.
This is your struggle.
And for those of you who are younger than I am, this may be your opportunity for greatness.
To serve in the name of our people.
Don't let that opportunity pass you by.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
I seem to have been the only one who stuck to the rules and left ten minutes for questions.
It was a very excellent speech, thank you, Jared.
I would like to first suggest that instead we nominate Dunkin' Donuts for the official coffee.
Very good.
So this question isn't entirely related to your speech, but it's one that I think deserves some consideration.
What do you think the role of religion should be in our movement?
Do you think that adherence of a particular religion should say, "Everyone needs to be my religion, otherwise the movement will fail"?
No, not at all.
If we are to be a nation, and I think we are a nation, we will be a nation that has a lot of different kinds of white people in it.
We will be a nation with people who are in favor of gun control.
People who don't want gun control, people who are Odinists, people who are Christians, people who are Catholics, Protestants.
We will have people who want small government, big government.
That's as it should be.
Nations are composed of people of different kinds.
I think if the idea is we're going to set, okay, the ethnostate is going to be X, Y, and Z, that is, I think, a crazy way to proceed because that will drive away people who are otherwise our comrades.
I hesitate very much to say, okay, in the ideal white society, It's going to be like this.
I, of course, have my preferences.
All of you in this room have your preferences.
But we may not be the majority.
It may be that the nature of white people is to live in a kind of Scandinavian socialism.
Maybe that's the way white people are happy.
Or maybe white people can also be happy in a much more individualistic, libertarian, rugged individualist kind of society.
I don't want to set the rules in advance, and I think it's a big mistake to do so.
Thanks to feminism, you know, the legal system is not only hostile to whites but to men.
How do we convince young white men, you know, to get married and have children with the risk of family courts being so hostile to men in general?
That's a very good question, and it's a difficult question not just for white societies.
Probably the societies with the lowest birth rates are some of the Asian societies, even worse than ours.
I understand that in Hong Kong and Singapore, the total fertility rate for a woman is less than one.
That means every generation cuts itself in half.
There's something about wealth and prosperity, I think, that makes us individualist and selfish.
Even Asians become individualist and selfish under these circumstances.
What the solution to that is, I don't know.
I think somebody quoted Juvenal earlier today.
He also said that luxury is more ruthless than war.
In some respects, that's true.
How do we convince people to have more children?
In my own case, I have only two children.
It's one of the great regards of my life.
I wish I'd had five or six.
I think it would have been a much, much better thing to do.
I would have been happier.
But my experience was this.
I didn't really want children.
Nobody told me how wonderful it was going to be.
And when I finally did have children, I find myself asking, why didn't anybody tell me?
This is the greatest thing I've ever done.
These little human beings love me and I love them.
What could be better than filling the world with people that I love and who love me so passionately?
It is really, and I say this to all of you men who don't necessarily feel any kind of paternal instinct, probably the change in my life from being a daddy skeptic to be a daddy was even greater.
Then moving from a conventional egalitarian on race to my position today.
It was a real transformation and I really asked myself,"How come nobody told me?" So I think that's part of sort of the ethos of our time is the idea that somehow having children is this old-fashioned silly thing to do.
If we had a state in which we had our own values to pursue, I think it could be a society in which we did encourage children.
And I think that we are susceptible to our surroundings.
When people realize that they are not just an individual, when they are part of a nation, part of a race, that we're part of this glorious procession that we hope will go on forever, I think under those circumstances, they can change mentally.
But until we do have a better control over the culture, we have to have a cultural influence among our own people.
To the extent that we can, and encourage the people who think like us to have as many children as possible.
Yes? First off, I'd just like to say thank you for all your work for our people.
And so my question to you is, I've noticed people are extremely empathetic and we're very easily guilted against the whole white guilt scenario that we're facing now.
And even if we can fix the problem that we're facing now between racial divides, how do we stop history from repeating itself?
I'm not at all worried about what would happen once white people had the gumption to establish their own societies.
We have seen the consequences of it.
And having seen those consequences, we take measures that are necessary for us to have our own societies.
I do not worry about our making the same mistakes over again.
The real prospect, the real problem is making that intellectual leap, making that transformation.
When I was in Germany just a few weeks ago, I changed trains at Cologne Station.
And a woman sat down next to me.
She's a 21-year-old girl.
She works in a factory.
And she wanted to practice her English, which was pretty good.
And the fact that this was Cologne, I managed to slip into the conversation.
What had happened on New Year's Eve, 2015-2016.
And that led this whole question of whether or not it's good for Germany to take in all these people.
She says, oh, of course we must take them in.
How would you feel?
If you were from some war-toned place and no one wanted to take you in, we owe it to these people.
How would you feel in their place?
This is something that is, I think, part of the DNA, literally, of white people.
We have to convince people that our own survival is a moral thing.
And for us to do something in a collective way, white people are different from everybody else.
We have to be convinced that it's moral.
And our survival is supremely moral.
But getting that message across to more and more white people, I think that is really the objective of our movement today.
I believe that separation can be peaceful.
We already have a considerable amount of separation in this country.
It's voluntary separation.
Despite the fact that every organ of media, every university, every church practically, is actively telling us we all have to live together.
If, instead, we lived in a climate in which it was recognized that the desire to live in a racially coherent society is not evil, that it is perfectly natural and normal, and if the government, at some level, whether it's locally or at the federal level,
it would be possible, if it recognized the legitimacy of this desire to not set obstacles in its way, I do think that peaceful separation is possible.
And what I would ask you is what are the alternatives if we do not?
Separate in some way.
We get to the scenario that was painted for me in glowing colors by a black professor with whom I had a debate at Eastern Kentucky State University on the subject of diversity.
He said it was a good thing.
I said it's a bad thing.
He said it's a good thing because with immigration from all around the world, with more and more mixed marriages, 200 years from now, there'll be no more white people.
He thought that was a great thing.
Well, I think that is in fact.
What we face if we do nothing and if we are unable to draw a boundary and say this is for us and that's for you.
We have to do this in order to survive.
▲
Export Selection