All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 30, 2020 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
59:24
New Meme: 13/56
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Radio Renaissance.
The date, today's date, is September 30th, 2020.
My name is Jared Taylor.
I am with American Renaissance, and with me is the great Paul Kersey.
Always a pleasure to have you with me, and today happens to be the day after the first debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden.
You know, I can only laugh right now because I still hear them yelling at each other and the moderator basically double-teaming President Trump as if it was a scripted World Wrestling Federation-style match, Mr. Taylor.
My question for you, though, what were your impressions?
Well, I have to disagree with you right off the bat.
I thought Mr. Wallace was remarkably fair-minded.
I don't think he was double-teaming.
I think he asked some pretty hard questions of Mr. Biden, and he had a very, very difficult time on his hand Trying to get an adolescent to behave like an adult.
And by that, I do not mean Joe Biden.
They were supposed to let the other speak, uninterrupted for two minutes.
I don't think he was capable of doing that maybe one time, twice.
And of course, once he started behaving like a child, so did Joe Biden.
Now, one thing I must say about so-called Sleepy Joe is those who say that this was going to be proof positive that he's lost all his marbles, They're clearly wrong.
He's lost a few, and as things went on, he began to mumble, and I think Donald Trump should have just left him alone.
Let him just babble and make a fool of himself, which he was increasingly going to do.
But an hour and a half, under the gun, on your feet, it's tough for those guys.
I mean, it'd be easy for a young stud like you, but for guys like them to be on their feet, answering questions, trying to think for that long, it's tough.
And I thought he did pretty well under the circumstances.
What were the moments where President Trump truly stumbled, where he had an opportunity to say something profound?
I can think of two, maybe three moments.
Well, let me hear your views.
I would say where he was asked to, once again, for what, the 100th time during his presidency, condemn White supremacy.
Now, he had been talking about the violence in the streets, and he should have simply asked, will my opponent condemn Antifa?
He could have put it on.
He did.
He gave an interesting answer about Antifa violence.
Again, he refuses to mention Black Lives Matter involvement in all of this violence.
We know that it's substantially more in some of these cities than Antifa.
Maybe not Seattle and Portland, but He could have put Vice President Biden on the spot by simply saying, well, you condemn what's happening out there, or are you going to be run by the leftists?
Because he kept trying to make that point over and over again.
Mr. Taylor and dear listener, you're the puppet of the radical left and nobody cares about socialists.
And, you know, he kept trying to interject those heritage point talking points.
Who really cares about that in 2020?
I don't think anybody much cares, but I agree with you.
Why can't he just come right out and say, I utterly oppose and despise white supremacy?
I think you and I both are in that same boat as we all.
We utterly oppose white supremacy.
Why can't he say that?
It beats me.
He has, as you say, he's had many, many opportunities to do so.
Well, the other big stumble, I think, in his case, was he was asked about this abolition of the so-called sensitivity training.
Critical race theory.
Critical race theory.
What's wrong with sensitivity training?
That's the question to answer.
And instead of saying, as Donald Trump did, it makes people hate America.
No, it makes people hate white people.
Come on, Mr. Trump.
Come on.
I think he really fumbled that one.
I thought it was fascinating that Chris Wallace positioned the question as if, how could you be against this?
That, to me, was the most fascinating aspect of that exchange.
It was a very clever way of saying it.
It's the most innocuous way of saying, who could be opposed to sensitivity training?
Of course, you could apply to that and say, well, isn't diversity our greatest strength?
How can we possibly need training to deal with our greatest strength?
Sensitivity training?
What's that?
Why do we need that?
It's because diversity is such a difficult, awful thing, Mr. Wallace.
But no, he's not smart enough to say that.
Then, the other thing that he could have done, and this would not have been an answer to a direct question, is to talk about the fact that the whole idea that all of these black people dying at the hands of police is not It's not a business.
It's got nothing to do with racism.
All you'd have to do is quote just a few statistics.
Even he could remember them.
But he failed to do that.
Completely failed.
And finally, to wrap a bow around the first debate, I also thought it was fascinating when Biden tried to blame President Trump For what, 1 in 10 blacks have died of COVID or something?
He threw that number out there, or 1 in 100.
I think it was 1 in 100.
And if we don't do what I want to do, it'll be 1 in 10.
And again, it's individuals, Mr. Taylor, who are dying of COVID because of poor life choices.
The more and more we learn about this disease, the more and more this virus The more and more we know that it primarily impacts people with comorbidities.
And guess what?
If blacks have higher rates of diabetes, if they're higher rates of obesity, Yep.
Well, there was a huge hole that Donald Trump left open for Joe Biden that Joe Biden failed to drive a truck through and that was when we're talking about appointments to the bench and Donald Trump said, when we came into office, there were 140 vacancies because you guys sat on your hands.
No, there were 140 vacancies because Mitch McConnell and the Republicans refused to bring the judges up for nomination.
I thought for sure, oh my gosh, Biden, Biden is gonna knock this one right out of the park.
But no, it was a fat ball across the plate and he missed.
He didn't even swing.
So there you go.
But anyway, I did not think it was particularly remarkable or memorable.
I don't think it's going to change anybody's mind.
So let's not spend too much time on it.
Now, unfortunately, this is going to be a rather crime-heavy episode of the podcast.
And we'll start off with murder statistics for 2019, which have just been released by the FBI.
And the FBI has reported that when the race of killers is known, 56% are black, although they are a mere 13.4% of the population.
The FBI is boneheaded as usual when it comes to distinguishing between Hispanics and whites, so we will not attempt to do that because the FBI doesn't give us the information to do so, but What we can very easily calculate is that compared to non-blacks, compared to everybody else in the whole country, blacks are 8.2 times more likely to be the known killers in a homicide.
Now, the figure is probably far greater if you're comparing blacks to whites for two reasons.
One is that the clearance rates are very low for murder.
In at least 30%, the race to killer is not known, even if there is a,
even if there is, even if there is an arrest.
30% of the time, you don't know what the race to killer is.
And if there's no arrest, if there's no clearance, it's probably because it's a black-on-black crime and nobody's going to cooperate with the police.
It's one of these situations in which It's some sort of gang related thing.
The police have very little information about it.
And then the other is that because Hispanics are not broken out, there's no way of telling how many of these allegedly white perps are in fact Hispanic and not white.
So my guess is if Given the paucity of known actual racial perps, and the ones we don't even know about, who are most likely to be black, and given that we don't know what the Hispanic rate is, this figure of 8.2, a multiple of 8.2 of black murder rate compared to non-black, I suspect if compared to whites alone, if we had those numbers, it would be something on the order of 10 to maybe 12 times.
Wow!
That's my guess, but we just don't know.
So that is just, that is speculation on my part, but Murder is apparently in the news to the point that USA Today feels the need to react to memes about it.
And alas, some of these memes are incorrect that circulate, but there you go.
Some of these memes are incorrect, but I think the fact that they're so popular, especially this one in particular, I'll describe it in a second, but the fact that USA Today actually has journalists fact-checking these memes to try and disprove them because so many people are sharing them on Twitter, on Facebook, probably a few on LinkedIn, maybe some are doing it on Gab, but that they're still allowed to share this particular meme on Facebook, it had to be fact-checked.
So, the one I'm talking about, it is a viral meme that purports to list homicide statistics by race.
If you recall, President Trump actually tweeted this one out back in 2013.
15 maybe a bit early 2016.
I think it was after he was president, but I'm not sure.
Yeah, it was maybe it was before maybe during the campaign I think it
was during the campaign because basically it shows a
caricature a drawing of a black guy holding a gun ghetto style sideways
And then it has this.
It says, homicide statistics by race in the US.
Whites killing blacks, 2%.
Police killing whites, 3%.
Whites killing whites, 16%.
Blacks killing whites, 81%.
Police killing blacks, 1%.
Blacks killing blacks, 97%.
I gotta tell you, I don't even know what those numbers even mean.
It's hilarious when you look at it.
I think people, again, it just plays on a stereotype that people obviously know to be true.
Now, if you actually did the math, as American Renaissance has done for a number of cities, using that same meme, you actually broke it down for New York, I believe, where you showed what would it look like if there weren't any, if New York was all white, how much crime would go down.
Well, here's what the USA Today did.
There's apparently a Facebook page called I Support Law Enforcement Officers,
and this post, this meme, this picture was posted there, and it got 611 shares.
So this USA Today reporter actually reached out to the page admin for comment, but they didn't get it.
But they decided to try and attack the piece.
Some versions of the meme include this line, quote, America does have a problem, but it's not what the media
tells you it is."
Now, of course, you just gave us the FBI crime statistics for 2019.
Obviously, those aren't being displayed in the New York Times, the Washington Post, or the USA Today.
No, it's only in dissident media that even talk about this.
So this article then goes on to try and downplay how rates of Homicide between white, white-on-white, and black-on-black are similar.
For whites, it's about 80% of homicides are white-on-white.
In other words, about 80% of white victims are killed by white perpetrators.
Correct.
And now for blacks, it's about 88%, almost 90%.
Now what the article then does bury is the fact that, well, there's a lot more black-on-white murders than there are white-on-black.
That's actually buried deep within the article.
Again, we all know that to be the case.
We've all looked at these numbers before.
So in 2018, they actually do quote FBI stats and they show that in 2018, 16% of white victims
were killed by black offenders while 8% of black victims were killed by white offenders.
It's a pretty big difference.
Well, and given that there are so many more white people, if you include Hispanics, that's probably six or seven, maybe eight times as many whites per capita are actually killed by blacks than the other way around.
Here's the interesting line the USA Today does to try and gloss over that.
They compare what they said, you know, was the number of Still a pretty big gap.
killing whites 81%.
And here's the line, the article that says this, quote, in both years, the numbers remained
within 8 percentage points, a much smaller gap than the 79% alleged in the viral post, end quote.
Still a pretty big gap.
And again, as you noted in the National Crime Victimization Survey, Hispanics are considered and classified as white
In the FBI.
It's in the murder statistics.
Correct.
But if you go to the NCVS, National Crime Victimization Survey, and you're just talking about violent crime aside from murder.
Correct.
Then Hispanics are actually broken out.
Yeah, and we know in that blacks committed an average of 560,600 violent crimes against whites, whereas whites only committed roughly 100,000 such crimes against blacks.
This means according to the National Crime Victimization Survey, that
blacks were the attackers in 84.9% of the violent crimes involving blacks and whites. Yes,
that is a staggering figure.
Now, these are all violent crimes that do not include homicide.
Homicide is largely within the race.
Correct.
But when it does cross races, black and white, blacks are, as I recall, something like 25 times more likely to kill a white person than the other way around, even though the numbers are relatively small.
These 600,000 figures, that is a very significant thing.
Yeah, and just to finish off this conversation, looking at that same data from the National Crime Victimization Survey, which, strangely, USA Today has never decided to have this on their cover.
New York Times, Washington Post, not worth really digging into this numbers too much, but here we go.
A black individual is 27 times more likely to attack a white person and 8 times more likely to attack a Hispanic than the other way around.
Also, a Hispanic is 8 times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa.
When whites commit violence, they choose fellow whites as victims 82.4% of the time and almost never attack blacks.
A mere 3.6%.
Blacks attack whites almost as often as they attack blacks.
41% versus 39%.
And Hispanics attack whites more often than they attack any other group.
51%!
Including the fact that they only attack 40% of their own in these attacks that were broken down by the National Crime Victimization Survey.
So, when you look at the numbers, instead of trying to Fact check a meme when all you're really doing to a reader who gets past everything is show that, hey, blacks are killing more whites.
It's actually true, it's just not to the extent that so many people are sharing this meme for it to be true.
It is interesting that if you come up with, what is some statistic, how many whites did it say were killed by blacks?
80% of whites were killed by blacks?
Is that what's implied?
Something like that?
People apparently are prepared to believe that.
Yes, and that to me I think is a It's an astonishing thing.
Well, anyway.
Yes.
These numbers, I'm afraid we're going to have a few more numbers.
And I apologize for that, but numbers are important.
We believe in data.
And this has to do with mass shootings.
There's something called the Gun Violence Archive.
Gun violence.
You know, it's always the guns.
The guns are always a problem.
The Gun Violence Archive.
And they define a mass shooting as four or more people hit.
Correct.
And analysis of the Gun Violence Archive found that such killings are up almost, shootings I mean to say, up almost 45% over the same period last year.
That's through about, that was through August 24th.
Now let us not forget that the real jump took place after the death of George Floyd.
That's right.
So, if it's up 45% for the whole year, if you compare some of these months in the summertime, after things really got frisky, you have, in some cities, leaps of 100%, 150%, in any case.
So, they are worried about what's going on and why is it, they ask, is this so much a problem for blacks and Hispanics?
Why is this mass shooting A problem for these BIPOC communities.
This article that you're talking about, this is from The Trace, correct?
Yes, from The Trace.
That's right.
Now, and Fernando Rejon, Executive Director of the Urban Peace Institute in Los Angeles, he says, it's part of systemic racism.
A very simple answer.
Now, the Urban Peace Institute trains for violence intervention workers.
I don't know who these people are.
I've never ever heard about any study that shows whether violence intervention workers work.
But in any case, he trains them.
Systemic racism, says Mr. Rehon, is really about power.
The power to determine whose life is valued and whose is not.
Now, frankly, I don't understand that.
If white people are determining that black lives are less valuable than white lives, is that the reason black people get the message and shoot each other?
Is that the reason Hispanics get the message and shoot each other?
Let's read this again.
It's about power.
The power to determine who's valued and who's not.
Okay, I guess white people are maliciously coming to some conclusion about who's valuable, and as a result of this, black people are going out and shooting each other, and so are Hispanics.
Logically, that's what follows from that statement.
Sounds that way to me.
Then there is Devone Boggan.
He's executive director of the Bay Area-based violence prevention group called Advance Peace.
Another one of these violence prevention groups, you know, I'd be very curious.
There are a lot of those groups who have a hand in the violence we're seeing all across the country, from Seattle to D.C.
and everywhere in between, to Kenosha.
But they're trying to prevent violence.
Well, this guy says the pandemic has increased violence in underserved areas.
Now, I'm not quite sure what underserved means.
I think that's just another word for saying black and Hispanic.
But he says the pandemic has increased violence by introducing unemployment, hampering access to mental health and other social services, and keeping everyone at home, fueling conflict within families and communities, and making it easier for rivals to track each other down.
That last one, I may believe.
If everybody's at home and you know that Leroy is the guy who stepped on your shoe, you may know where Leroy lives.
And so you can go blow him away if you want.
But the idea that the problem is unemployment.
Hampering access to mental health care.
You think all those ghetto thugs are just all of a sudden, oh, I couldn't see my shrink today.
I better go shoot somebody.
Well, I mean, that might be the reason why there was that shooting at that haunted house when somebody tried to cut in line and they decided to open fire.
That was spooky, all right.
Very spooky.
And that was black-on-black, as I recall.
It was.
It was.
Far scarier to be in that line with those brothers than it would be to actually go through the haunted house.
Very spooky.
Very haunted.
And then, now, here's another lady.
Amber Goodwin, the founding director of the Community Justice Action Fund.
She says, When these mass shootings happen in white communities, everybody has a response.
They have policies, investments, thoughts, and prayers.
Well, they don't happen very often.
If they do happen, it's usually for some sort of terroristic reason.
But in any case, you just don't have some white guy going berserk at a block party and sending 100 rounds down range and killing 15 people or hitting 15 people.
When I was looking at stories today, a story popped up of a shooting at a funeral home in Milwaukee.
Seven people were shot.
I don't know if there's a similar story outside of a Hollywood scriptwriter trying to show Italian mobsters doing something like that, but I think that the mobsters actually have a code that you wouldn't attack a funeral.
That's right, you don't attack family members.
So, but anyway, if white people, you know, if you had white people that shot each other up at a funeral and 15 people stopped bullets, yeah, it'd be big news.
But it would be big news because it's so rare.
But then, if black people are shot and killed, it's a lack of response.
Or if there's a response, it is carceral.
carceral. That means people try to nab the killer and get him in jail. Now that wouldn't happen in
a white shooting, you know, we just coddle the killer and say, oh social services, this is nuts.
Of course you want to nab the killer and get him in jail.
Now more explanations. According to this article, the black and latinx people, the activists and
community residents who talked about all of this, they said that a big problem is poverty.
A problem of scarcity that drives gun violence.
They're hungry, so they shoot each other.
They need a new pair of shoes, so they shoot each other.
A lack of jobs and after-school programs.
Homelessness and underfunded school districts.
Oh my gosh, boy, you know, we ran out of pencils today.
This, I mean, you know, the last thing they're able to say is, well, these people are homicidal degenerates.
I mean, if you're white people, and people are happy to say Hitler was a homicidal degenerate, or Stalin, or Donald Trump.
Yeah, all they'd say is a homicidal degenerate.
If you're white, that means you are utterly disqualified from any kind of root cause, root cause.
But if you're black, you're never a homicidal degenerate.
It's always because white people did something that deprived you.
Yeah, there's always another root cause to unearth, as opposed to just simply saying, hey, quit breaking the law, quit shooting each other.
That's right.
Just stop.
Yes.
Just put the gun down.
Yes.
Don't be a homicidal degenerate.
No, no, no, no, no.
There's no such thing.
If you're black or if you're Hispanic, you're never a homicidal degenerate.
You are downtrodden.
You're underserved, as they put it.
Anyway, I'm so sick of this.
Now, the New York Times, of course, is warning us that when there is a rise in murder rates, do not blame a party.
And I think they're right about that, but tell us, give us your take on that.
Yeah, this is actually by a guy who used to be a CIA analyst, a guy named Jeff Asher.
He wrote this piece, and it's, murders are rising, blaming a party doesn't help.
The subhead was, the data reveals a different picture than the party-driven explanation of President Trump and the DOJ.
He showed that in 59 cities with murder data available through at least July of this year, murder is up 28% relative To the matching time frame in 2019.
That's substantial.
Especially when the trend was going down.
You think about what happened during the first six years of the Obama presidency.
Things were actually relatively calm.
And then, of course, the Black Lives Matter movement gets started in 2014.
we really see things kick off with Ferguson and the so-called Ferguson effect. However,
during President Trump's first three years in office up until the events of May 25th,
crime was going down. Homicide was dropping. He has right to have said that. He was wrong
to talk about criminal justice reform because last night during the debate, he made the
mistake of once again trying to say Joe Biden was wrong for the 1994 Crime Act. When it's
like, no, Joe Biden was 100% right. That's what you ran on, pal, in 2016. Shut up, dude.
That's the only good thing you did. Yeah, exactly. So big cities tend to overstate national
crime trends. So a small rise in murder would be expected nationally, but a 15% increase
in murders nationally in 2020 would be the largest.
One year increase in modern American history in terms of both raw numbers and percentage change.
Reliable data on national trends began roughly in 1960.
Of course, America was a far different country before then.
We were still 90% white.
You know, blacks were largely in the South still.
They had the Great Migration started.
So, you know, Detroit, Cleveland, Baltimore, Philadelphia, New York had seen large growth in the black population.
We know, of course, what happened after that.
I will permit myself to interrupt you.
I did a video about how people shoot each other in Chicago.
Oh!
And we looked back into the era of the 20s, the roaring 20s, the Al Capone 20s.
Yes!
And compared murder rates then to murder rates in the 1990s.
Huge difference.
About three times the murder rate in the 1990s.
Of course, Al Capone and Chicago back in the 1930s, overwhelmingly white.
Oh, it was 94% white, I think.
And you can find that data in the archives of amrin.com.
I think in 19 and you can find that data in the archives of amaran.com. It's called something
And I'm proud to be a part of the great replacement series and hopefully mr. Hood will resurrect that
He's been doing some really fantastic writing recently.
I've been pitching Philadelphia and Boston because those two cities are shocking.
But let's just take a quick look at some of this data.
Steve Saylor broke out in a spreadsheet over at UNZ.com some of the cities where 59 reporting
cities through various dates in September compared to 2019.
Some very big cities are missing.
You can go access this at UNZ.com and go to Steve Saylor's blog.
But just some of these numbers are just striking.
Like Milwaukee in 2019 through September there have been 66 murders.
In 2020, 134 for an increase in change of 103%.
That's a lot, guys and girls.
That's a lot.
Minneapolis, where George Floyd was taken from us.
He was taken from us.
32 murders in 2019 through September.
There's been 57 for an increase of 78%.
Now that is a huge number.
I think we're going to talk some more about Minneapolis and the de-policing efforts that were underway a little bit later in this program, but that's a huge increase.
Louisville, Breonna Taylor's home place.
Also Papa John, he's from there as well.
Louisville, it's one of the whiter big cities.
I think Louisville is still about 72% white.
Is it that white?
I'm not sure, but anyway, yes.
62 murders through 2019 at this point, you know, because it does have a very violent black population.
104 now.
In 2020, for an increase of 68%.
Here's another one.
Everyone thought that New Orleans, there were a number of stories.
I remember reading the New York Times, the Washington Post.
Everyone was talking about, hey, we finally gotten a handle on crime in the Big Easy.
Murders dropping, non-fatal shootings are dropping.
This is great.
We've turned the corner.
Last year, 87 murders through September of 2019.
This year, 133 for an increase of 53 percent.
Laissez les bonnes temps rouler.
Yeah, there you are.
Well, that corner just refuses to be turned.
And then just a few more.
Atlanta, Georgia, which is where we saw some of the more striking images from these riots.
If you recall that night where the CNN Center was vandalized and they had the Mexican flag, the Black Lives Matter flag, they climbed atop the CNN logo there at the CNN headquarters.
You had the police shooting at the Wendy's.
I can't remember the guy's name.
The police, of course, were who were involved.
They were arrested and indicted by the black district attorney.
Atlanta, Georgia.
In 2019, through September, 69 murders.
This year, 97.
An increase of 41%.
I mean, we're talking about, yes, as Jeff Asher pointed out in this piece, the largest single one-year increase by both raw numbers and percentage since they've been doing this.
Don't forget, as the fellows I mentioned earlier, it's COVID that's doing this.
It's scarcity.
It's underfunded school districts.
That's what's causing it.
It's in every city you can think of, from D.C.
to Dallas to Las Vegas.
Interestingly, I'll just leave this one out there, and maybe you can have an opinion on why.
Baltimore, actually, I guess, I don't know how many bodies there are left.
Black bodies to desecrate.
Sorry, with apologies to Tinesi Coates.
Last year through September 2019, Baltimore had 247 murders.
That's just a shocking amount.
This year, 240.
So they're actually down.
So congratulations, Baltimore.
It's been a really rough year for a lot of cities, for a lot of people, but you guys are down.
Seven.
Great job.
Not bad.
Well, let's see if they can keep it up.
Yes, indeed.
Well, you know, we'll be glad to learn that Citicorp has quantified the economic impact of systemic racism.
You and I have been unable to detect systemic racism, so not only have they detected it, they've quantified its costs.
And what they've determined is that over the past 20 years, black workers have lost $113 billion in potential wages because they couldn't get a college degree.
No.
Why not?
Why couldn't they get the... Who's stopping them?
Racism!
Systemic racism!
Come on!
I think all they've really done here is compare blacks and whites.
How many black people have a college degree?
How many white people have a college degree?
And the only reason they couldn't possibly have a college degree is because of systemic racism.
So that's the way they calculated it.
Then, the housing market lost $218 billion in sales because black applicants couldn't get home loans.
Did you know that?
I didn't know that.
And $13 trillion in business revenue never flowed into the economy because black entrepreneurs couldn't get bank loans.
Now, this is being done by Citicorp.
Did Citicorp deny bank loans to entrepreneurs because they were black?
Are they admitting that they were engaging in systemic racism by actually holding individual blacks to credit-worthy standards?
Yeah, to standards because they have shareholders and stockholders they have to answer to and they have to be profitable.
They have to have a good P.E.
What are their earnings per share?
What's going on here?
They need to redistribute all that.
Well, the U.S.
could have had five trillion dollars more We could have $5 trillion more in gross domestic product over the next five years if these gaps and others were closed today.
In other words, if you could engage in human alchemy and turn black people into white people with the Philosopher's Stone, the Ta-Nehisi Coates Stone, then we would get $5 trillion more.
So, the Citicorp Banking Chairman Raymond McGuire said in a statement Racial inequality has always had an outsized cost and one that was thought to be paid only by underrepresented groups, but this report underscores that this tariff is levied on us all.
We're all the poorer because that $5 trillion is not going to flow into the economy.
It goes on to explain incarceration rates, voter suppression efforts, conscious bias in hiring all play a role.
And separately, Citicorp explained that it would direct $1 billion towards helping close the racial wealth gap.
$1 billion.
I don't know over the next three years, this will include investing $550 million in encouraging homeownership for people of color.
Now, are they just going to hand out home loans, I wonder?
We'll see.
That's a lot of money.
Yes.
That's a lot of money.
You know, I own a small amount of Citicorp stock.
I think now's the time to sell.
But another $50 million will go towards capital investments for black entrepreneurs.
So, they are doing their part, ladies and gentlemen, to overcoming the effects of systemic racism.
$333 billion a year over three years.
It's just extraordinary.
Well, and you know, as I say, this is something you and I can't even detect, but not only can they detect it, they can figure out right down to the million dollars how much it costs America and how much it costs Black people.
They're pretty wizardly folk, these folks.
You know, it's interesting.
I don't know if any of our listeners will catch some of those metaphors, some of those analogies throughout there.
A lot of Harry Potter there.
Nicholas Flamel.
I love it.
There is no racial alchemy.
That's the great lesson, Mr. Taylor, of the past 60, 70 years of this attempt by the elite in America to explain away racial differences and blame white people, from the Kerner Commission to everything that's come after it.
We can't just step back and say, wait a second, we were wrong.
No, the Philosopher's Stone has not yet been discovered, which, when touched to the forehead of a black person, turns him into a good little white person.
And even if you could succeed, that would be considered cultural appropriation or cultural something or other.
I give up.
But, now I believe you had a story about a driver in California who has been charged with trying to mow down MAGA people.
A lot of similarities here to a certain event that happened, which, of course, yours truly told people on this very program not to go to and to stay the heck away from.
The weekend before it happened, I would, of course, be referring to what happened in Charlottesville in 2017.
So here's what happened.
The headline reads, Orange County District Attorney said driver tried to kill Trump supporters that were in Yorba Linda rally, charges her, this black woman, with attempted murder.
Now, you had not even heard of this story.
No, I had not.
You had not heard of this story.
I had not, no.
This is, again, think back over the past month and a half.
We've had the incident in Columbus, Georgia, where a black guy had watched videos of police Brutality against blacks, and then he decided to go stab, I think, an AutoZone employee?
It was an AutoZone employee.
Stabbed him seven times.
In the back.
And then he beat the hell out of some white degenerate in jail.
It wasn't that much of a degenerate.
I think it was some sort of... He jumped... He had some sort of... I think he had a sexual... I think he was a sexual pervert.
Oh, I think he was.
I think that was the reason.
So, you know... In any case.
Here's something that you might not know about American Renaissance, as the black community defends such individuals like George Floyd, who put a gun to a pregnant woman's belly during a 2009 home invasion, or who was the gentleman in Baltimore?
Not a gentleman.
I'm wrong to say that.
Freddie Gray.
Freddie Gray, of course, who sold heroin to his own community and had all sorts of charges against him.
These are just wonderful people, right?
Here we are in a situation where the organizer of a South Southern California rally against police brutality and racism was charged with attempted murder this past Tuesday, September 29th, for driving her car into counter protesters, i.e.
Trump supporters, and running over a woman's head when she did this.
But did not manage to kill the woman?
Not yet.
The woman's still alive.
Now, Tatiana Turner, This is the black woman who was the organizer of this rally against, again, police brutality and racism.
Deliberately drove into a crowd of President Trump supporters with the intent to kill the woman and also seriously injured a man who broke his leg, Orange County prosecutors stated.
Quote, she positioned her vehicle to be used as a backup weapon, and she used that vehicle as a deadly weapon, willing to injure and kill those who stood in her way, District Attorney Todd Spitzer said in a statement.
Turner tried unsuccessfully to get help from deputies Saturday in Yorba Linda after her group was overwhelmed by a hostile crowd.
Turner saw people with guns and feared for her life when she got into a car that was blocked by Trump supporters, attorney Ludlow Creary said.
She was trying to get away and didn't intend to hit anyone.
I've heard that before.
That same rationale was used, and there's video evidence that shows what actually happened.
None of that was actually allowed.
It seemed like this guy in Charlottesville was convicted before any evidence was even allowed to be presented in his case.
Yes.
But it is interesting to me.
So she's going to try to plead that she was trying to get away from these murderous white people?
Yeah.
Her lawyer said this, quote, there were actions that caused her to become fearful for her life.
And that's when she accelerated, end quote, of course, into a crowd of Trump supporters.
And she's, like I said, she's a person who has Done a lot when it comes to demonstrating for causes aligned with the Black Lives Matter movement.
So, again... Okay, well, the jury will decide.
Justice, let us hope, will be done.
Yeah, and her group is called the Urban Organizers Coalition.
They had planned to march at the Yorba Linda Library, but they were quickly overwhelmed and threatened by Trump supporters, is what her lawyer is saying.
The DA, referred to Turner's group as, quote, professional militant organizers in, quote, far harsher language than we've seen from most Republicans.
And he said that Turner was seen in videos waving a baton and spraying what appeared to be prepper spray earlier in the protest.
Some members of her group had helmets and riot shields.
So basically, we have a situation where, you know, This is all we'll say about the whole Proud Boys comment last night at the debate and everything, but we have seen the left...
The radical left.
The anti-white radical left.
Whatever you want to call them.
At the end of the day, what motivates a lot of these people, even though a lot of them are white, is how much they have anti-white animus.
You might disagree with that, but that's truly what it is.
You see a group of Trump supporters, especially in Yorba Linda, they're all going to be white.
They're going to be waving the American flag.
They're going to be proud to be American.
They're going to be proud of our country.
All President Trump has to do is say, you know what, I'm going to give an address to the nation, and I'm going to highlight this attack.
It's like what happened in Portland.
He should be talking about the fact that a Trump supporter was shot by that 100% Antifa guy.
Yes.
In cold blood.
Dies.
Yes.
Or Kyle Rittenhouse.
There are good Americans out there who just want somebody to lead them.
And that's why you were elected in 2017, Mr. President.
2016.
And inaugurated in 2017.
He doesn't seem to realize that.
People want an American Renaissance.
Don't you understand that?
Yes.
They do!
He doesn't.
He doesn't, alas.
In fact, in so many respects, we're going the wrong way.
And this is an excellent example of it.
On September 2nd, Earlier this month, two black students on the Ohio State University campus punched some white people and called them racial slurs.
Ooh, hate crime.
Well, on September 3rd, the Ohio State University, the public safety people, sent out a safety notice to students that mentioned a hate crime perpetrated by two African American suspects.
But it failed to mention the victim's race.
Now, please listen carefully to this tweet that was tweeted out by a campus group.
It said this.
Last Thursday, Ohio State sent out an irresponsible public safety notice that claimed OSU students were the victims of a hate crime.
The email identified the alleged attackers as black while failing to mention that the victims were white.
This is unacceptable.
Now, who does it sound to you as though that was representing?
I mean, you'd think, is this some white student group that's saying, wait a minute, okay, all very fine to say it was a hate crime, but let's point out that it was white people who were the victims.
Yeah.
No, you'd be wrong if you thought that.
This was a black group, as we will discover.
Now, as it turns out, the University Police Chief, Kimberly Spears McNatt, Stated that the university is required to report hate crimes under the federal Gene Cleary Act.
I've never heard of that.
I've not heard that either.
Worth looking into.
Because they get federal funds, if there are crimes the community is supposed to know about them, and hate crimes are the sorts of things they're supposed to alert the community to.
But on September 8th, roughly 100 students gathered outside the administration building in order to protest the error and confusion in the handling of the public safety notices.
They should not have said that this happened!
And black student Deja Gidding tweeted, OSU is mocking their entire black student body right now.
They're blatantly making campus more uncomfortable and dangerous for us and people of color by saying that it was a hate crime, by saying that it was black people who did it.
That is the big problem.
And when this guy, when the student group said, and not telling us that they were white is unacceptable, the reasoning was, believe it or not, the same group said the incident could not be a hate crime because racial slurs directed at white people are not based on a history of violence and oppression towards white people.
In other words, theoretically, I suppose, it could have been a hate crime if the victims were American Indians or if the victims were Asians, but since they're white people, you can call white people anything you like and it's not a hate crime because you beat them to death.
It's almost as if it's justified to call them whatever they want to because we go back to the whole idea of critical race theory.
What is the ultimate goal of critical race theory?
As the non-white population continues to rise, what are you doing?
But you're antagonizing that group with Hey, every failure we have in life, every problem we face, every barrier to get credit from Citigroup, to get a loan for a home or for a small business as an entrepreneur, it's all because of white people.
That's right.
And you know what?
They deserve to be called honky.
Oh, they can't.
I wonder what the insult was.
Because, you know, you can say all of these words, cracker, honky, pohwat, buckra, all of these things, and nobody gets much upset.
It'd be interesting to know just what he said.
I imagine he said, something else, you know, which is more black.
But who knows?
I think it's an interesting little fact that was left out.
Maybe it was a word that was just so shocking we're not allowed to hear.
But to me, there are two important things here.
One is that the campus is outraged that a hate crime, or what appears to be a hate crime, was even reported.
And then this black campus group is saying, Hate crime?
Not possible!
Not possible!
Do you remember the University of Minnesota, I believe, they stopped reporting crimes and identifying the race because basically everything they sent out, the suspect was a black male.
Hey, there was a rape attempt, there was a vandalizing, there was a car broken into, there was an assault.
It was feeding stereotypes, so we can't do that.
Yes, it was confirming stereotypes, so that type of reporting which actually kept people safe.
So, here is the solution.
A California school district has found the solution.
They reported what appeared to be a noose and it was found hanging from a tree in front of a home within the school district, not even on any kind of campus grounds, within the school district in Piedmont, California.
Local police were called in urgently and concluded it was a rope swing.
It was a rope swing.
The school district swiftly responded, not by closing the investigation, but by saying that it's time to impose race, education, and anti-racism goal on students and staff.
The principals, assistant principals, superintendents from both high schools in the Piedmont Unified School District sent a message to parents, students, and staff, notifying them that although the intent of the local rope appears to be innocuous, The district would nevertheless be conducting sessions on systemic racism and identity privilege.
This is an opportunity to do good, no matter what.
They said, While it is unlikely that most of us will replicate this particular act, well, so what if they did?
You can hang a rope swing for children, can't you?
Can't you do that?
Hey, with Halloween coming up, you got to be careful what kind of props and gimmicks you put in your art, ladies and gentlemen.
I guess.
While it's unlikely most of us will replicate this particular act, it's likely that those of us with identity privilege have caused harm unintentionally to those with non-dominant identities.
Did you realize some people have non-dominant identities?
Is that another synonym for people of color now?
We've got so many words.
People of color, they're BIPOCs, they're non-whites, they're, gosh, non-dominant identities.
I'd like a dominant identity myself.
I don't want some wimp identity.
You have an identity that is denigrated 24-7, 365 days a year.
Every, every dominant power, every corporation, every school in the country.
So that's your dominant identity.
Congratulations.
I guess you're right.
Somehow I'm bearing up pretty well under the strain.
But the school administrators also took this as an opportunity to promote their racial equity curriculum.
Devoted to providing equitable outcomes for students who identify as black, indigenous, and people of color.
In other words, BIPOCs.
Now, I still don't understand this.
Identify?
I mean, would that have included Rachel Dolezal?
Or Jessica Krug?
Didn't they identify as black?
What is it?
I just don't get it.
Not only did those women identify as black, but they prospered by that identity of blackness by rejecting their whiteness.
I feel like I'm a black academician talking right there and using this weird language and lexicon and vernacular.
What's this identify?
I identify as black.
Well, anyway.
Are they black or do they just identify as black?
I don't get it.
This is just too deep for me.
But now, yes, we're going to talk about Minneapolis.
Oh, you know, New York Times had a long, tearful article about the fact that three months ago, the majority of the Minneapolis City Council pledged to defund the police department.
But now some council members have second thoughts.
As you pointed out, murder is going up, up, up, up.
And Councilor Andrew Johnson, one of the nine members who supported the pledge, said that he meant the words in spirit.
Not by the letter.
He identified with the words in spirit.
It's more appropriate.
It's not a matter.
Yes, it's just we said this in spirit.
Another counselor, Philippe Cunningham, said the language of the pledge was up to interpretation.
Yes, defund the police.
That's really up to interpretation.
And that even among council members, soon after the promise was made, it was very clear that most of us had interpreted that language differently.
Lisa Bender, the council president, paused for, you could count them, 16 seconds.
When asked if the council statement had led to uncertainty, at a pivotal moment for the city, 16 seconds, that's a long time to be asked a question and just sit there and think.
And after the 16 seconds ticked by, she said, I think our pledge created confusion.
Ah, yes, I suspect it did.
Now, in Minneapolis, The whole idea has basically collapsed.
City Council members had pledged to end policing as we know it.
But you will recall that Jacob Frey, who is a soy boy to his fingertips, had nevertheless said that he was not in favor of defunding the police.
And he was heckled and yelled at.
You're talking about the mayor.
You're talking about this person I forgot.
Yeah, Jacob Frey.
I know who you're talking about.
He is the epitome of a soy boy, is he not?
Yes, but Minneapolis has banned chokeholds and it's got now de-escalation requirements, whatever those are.
But, as you point out, gun violence, it's always gun violence, violence is going up, up, up, up.
But the fact is on June 9th, I beg your pardon, June 7th, nine counselors stood with activists in Powderhorn Park during an event that was neither ambiguous nor done in spirit.
And there's a big sign that said, defund the police.
That's nine out of 13 council members.
And there's another interesting, Philippe Cunningham, who we talked about earlier, who said, it's just kind of an idea.
He says, I was surprised and overwhelmed by the national attention.
A big lesson learned for me was to be mindful of the language and words we used.
Well, congratulations, city councilor.
Yes.
Language matters.
And when you say defund the police, people think you might actually mean it.
And so, even 50% of black people in the city of Minneapolis are opposed to defunding the police.
And just one last point here, On the other hand, Miski Noor, Miski, she is one of our African-American fellow citizens and an activist who uses the they-them pronouns, they offered another hypothesis.
They said, it is a system working exactly as designed.
It's the nature of white supremacy, capitalism, patriarchy, or any of these other systems of oppression to want to do what is necessary to save themselves.
That's how she explains the fact that this wonderful idea of defunding the police has somehow been derailed.
And now they say, oh, we didn't mean it was only in spirit.
It is because white supremacy, capitalism, and patriarchy, and the other systems of oppression, I wonder which others there are, are doing what's necessary to save themselves.
So that explains it.
And remember from that data breaking down murders and through September of 2019 through September of 2020, Minneapolis 32 in 2019.
57% during that same time period.
So, again, since we've seen a 78% increase all during that time period where police were afraid to do anything.
You had, what was it, the 3rd Precinct was destroyed?
Yeah, taken over, burned down.
Your Soy Boy Mayor just basically said, hey, pull back, pull back.
We've lost.
I mean, you think about all that has happened in 2020.
You forget what was going on during that initial couple nights.
But they're going to get rid of the police, yeah.
Great.
It's working out really well when we have a 28% increase in murder over a year.
Well, I bet you've never heard of Tyree Conyers Page.
That's because he now goes by the name of Sir Major Page.
Maybe you haven't heard of him.
I haven't heard either name.
M-A-E-J-O-R.
I'm not quite sure how to pronounce that.
Sir Major.
Sir.
I like that.
Well, his Facebook page describes him as an activist, actor, model, reporter, speaker, civil rights leader, agitator, and police brutality expert.
He's quite the triple threat man.
And he has a Facebook page called Black Lives Matter of Greater Atlanta and he solicited money through a GoFundMe account.
Well, it languished between April 2018 and May 2020.
And you know what happened in May 2020?
All too well.
And its bank balance during that period never exceeded $5,000, but after St.
George was taken from us, as you so felicitously put it, the money rolled in.
Ooh.
Rolled in.
What had just been a balance of $5,000, $470,000 came in between June and August in three months.
Repeat that number again.
came in between June and August in three months. Repeat that number again. $470,000.
$470,000.
They hit the jackpot. Well, suddenly as all this money was rolling in, numerous videos and live
stream videos were posted on Mr. Page's personal social media pages boasting about his tailored
suits, his nice cufflinks, and his $100,000.
Turns out he also spent $112,000 on a home in Toledo, Ohio.
Don't know why this Atlanta boy is buying a home in Toledo, Ohio, and another lot next to it.
Property must be cheap in Toledo.
But in any case, at one time, this Conyers Page lad was a prominent name in racial activism in the Atlanta area, but now it looks as though of that $470,000 that rolled in, He diverted at least $200,000 into purchases that had nothing to do with improving black lives other than his own.
So, he has been arrested by the FBI.
Now, I would be tempted to call him melanin-enhanced.
The fact is, he is badly melanin-deprived.
The truth of the matter is, Sir Major Page is an albino.
Oh!
Yes.
But he's nevertheless one of the brothers But his was a black life that was dramatically improved, at least for a while.
But now it looks as though he's going to be in the big house.
Momentarily improved.
Momentarily improved.
Now, it reminds me also of another case recently, Christian Dunbar.
He was appointed treasurer of Philadelphia in 2019.
And as treasurer, he oversaw Philadelphia's $4 billion investment portfolio.
And he managed the city's debts, the bank accounts, and its cash.
Well, it turns out he's a Liberian immigrant.
He obtained American citizenship fraudulently by marrying a U.S.
citizen who sponsored him for a green card.
They divorced just two months after Dunbar obtained citizenship status.
He and his current wife secretly wed in Senegal while he was still legally married to this American.
In his previous job as a financial advisor for Wells Fargo clients in Pennsylvania, he stole at least $15,000 from his customers.
So, on Friday, he was fired.
Now, it turns out that if convicted, he could face a maximum of 45 years in prison and a $1.5 million fine.
My reaction is, take the fine and then just send him home.
Just send him home.
But this guy was clearly a victim of white racist Minneapolis police officers.
That's the only thing he explained what he could have possibly done.
Now I believe you have a story about Prince William County not far from here and it's going to have to go quickly.
I'll be quick just to point out that elections have consequences.
Prince William County actually was a county that Not that long ago, I want to say in the past five, six, seven years was actually right leaning due to I think now it's basically a suburb of DC as more and more people come to work for the federal government and the various
Organizations, government contractors, they want to have a nice home, live out in Prince William County.
So the ICE put this out.
I saw this on the ICE website, ice.gov.
They said this about Prince William, now is non-cooperative policies when it comes to illegal aliens.
A new non-cooperation policy by Prince William County Virginia has reversed years of public safety cooperation and threatens to endanger the public.
The new policy bars the Prince William County Jail from cooperating with U.S.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement when officers lodge immigration detainers for individuals
in local custody who are in violation of immigration law.
Per the policy, the jail can notify ICE of impending release for individuals booked in
on felony charges.
If an individual is charged with a misdemeanor, ICE will not be notified, regardless of whether
they have a serious criminal history. Disappointing to see the counties in
Virginia like Prince William County and their cooperation and agreements with ICE.
ICE is committed to keeping the community safe and will continue to enforce our nation's immigration laws in every neighborhood, even those who refuse to cooperate with federal law enforcement.
Once again, this is a county that has gone from Red to blue.
And when you have officials take roles within the county, whether it's a county board, they will then, you know, if it's a, you know, five, seven members, as long as they have a majority, they can say, you know what?
We're going to pass.
Screw this.
We're not going to agree anymore with ICE.
You know, we've spoken about this on many of our episodes, but the idea of having an opportunity to take some miscreant, a criminal, you know, he's a criminal.
He's in the pokey because he's a criminal.
And ICE comes along and says, we'll take him off your hands.
We'll ship him out of the country.
Why would you not say yes?
To poke systemic racism in the face, because ICE is nothing more than the weaponized white supremacy.
Don't you know that?
I guess you're right.
Well, now I know.
Now I understand.
And so, ladies and gentlemen, thank you.
Thank you for your attention.
Thank you for your indulgence.
Thank you for your support.
▲
Export Selection