All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 23, 2020 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
59:02
52 Million More Americans
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen, it is September 23rd, Year of Our Lord 2020.
I am Jared Taylor, and this is Radio Renaissance.
Welcome.
With me is my co-host, Paul Kersey.
So glad you could be with us today.
You know, we haven't done this in a while, but I thought we'd go ahead and put this at the beginning, Mr. Taylor, and invite all of our listeners from around the world.
Send us your questions.
Send us topics you'd like us to talk about.
There is an election coming up in, oh, what, less than 40 days?
50 days?
Is there really?
I think there is.
With all that's going on, you wouldn't think about it.
But we'd love to hear from you.
More importantly, we'd love to make sure that you The listener have a chance to get the latest American Renaissance newsletter as well.
So, send us your email to becausewelivehereatprotonmail.com or you can contact amran.com and click on the contact us page.
We would also like to hear your comments and corrections.
I hope we're going to have time later on to read to you a comment from a listener that I thought was particularly interesting.
But let us start first with the great leap forward that the Democrats have made in this fight for victory against the virus.
The House of Representatives has voted for a resolution condemning terms such as Chinese virus.
It criticized President Donald Trump by name for using such terms and the Democrats have insisted that his language has increased discrimination against Asian Americans.
I wonder how they know.
I'd like to see the proof.
Their resolution was sponsored by Representative Grace Meng of New York.
Needless to say, of Chinese origin.
And it passed on Thursday, 243 to 164.
On the floor, Nancy Pelosi herself explained, quote, the White House itself uses dangerous, false and offensive terms to describe the coronavirus.
False?
Well, I don't know.
I think everybody agrees it started out in Wuhan.
And the idea that it is somehow offensive to name a disease from the locality from which it originated is a little bit odd insofar as we do have the Spanish flu.
I guess that's a terrible insult against Spaniards, but they can be insulted.
There is West Nile virus.
There is?
There's also Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, MERS it's also called, and the Ebola virus.
Did you know that that comes from the Ebola River in the Congo?
I did know that.
Good for you.
There is the Zika virus.
Its name comes from the, do you know what?
Zika.
Zika, that's the insect or?
No, no, no, no, no, no.
You can insult insects, I think.
Maybe.
So far, I don't know.
Of course, I don't know, is swine flu okay?
Is that an insult to pigs?
That's an insult to pigs everywhere.
The Zika virus is named from the Zika forest.
Oh, that's right.
Of Uganda, where the virus was first isolated back in 1947.
But this is a great blow for goodness, truth, beauty, and the fight against the virus.
And I'd like to talk about a research results from the Federation for American Immigration Reform, FAIR, which does useful work sometimes.
It analyzed Joe Biden's immigration plan.
And it will tell you that Joe Biden has got big plans for America and big plans for you.
Thanks to Amnesty, new visa program.
And increases to existing legal immigration levels.
We're looking at a potential addition to the population of no fewer than 52 million.
52 million people.
52 million people.
And the country is currently what, about 330?
325.
325, so you're talking about well over, that's significant.
15% increase.
That is quite a dose of new humans.
And that would include amnesty for anywhere from 11 to 22 million.
That is the best yes that FAIR has.
And of course, all of these new X illegal Legal residents would bring family, and each new immigrant brings, on average, three and a half new ones.
So that would be an additional 43 million right there.
Then another 2.4 million could happen to come to the U.S.
through a new city-requested visa category.
In other words, cities that think they're desperate for humans, they can put in a special request, and it's estimated in the first four years of a Biden presidency, we can get another 2.4 million.
So all of this could happen in just the first four years.
And I guess if then Kamala takes over, there could be just as many, perhaps even more.
We will see.
But on the subject of immigrants, I believe you have a story about an illegal immigrant in New York City that was freed, how many, 10 times?
I do have that.
Catch and release, 10 times.
I want to make one observation though.
Yeah, please do.
The writer Matthew Iglesias, I think he writes... Iglesias?
Iglesias, yeah.
Iglesias, yeah.
He writes for what publication, a Vox?
He's got a new book out making the argument that we should have one billion humans and Americans.
And he was on Glenn Beck's program and Glenn Beck agreed with him.
Now, because we've got to counter China or something of that nature.
A billion.
That means about three times our current population.
Correct.
Oh boy.
When's the last time you were driving down the highway and you said to yourself, gosh, too few cars.
I want more.
Actually, during COVID, quite often.
Not I. When's the last time you were driving along and you saw all this beautiful forest and you said, gee, I want more strip malls.
There's too many trees, too many rivers.
Not enough McDonald's that will be inevitably abandoned in 10 years.
Correct.
A billion people.
Now, what's Uncle Matt's explanation for wanting a billion people?
It's counterintuitive, actually.
I can give it to you right here if you give me 20 seconds.
I actually have the story pulled up.
And I quote, Steve Saylor did a great review about this idea of increasing, as you said, adding almost an additional 666 million people.
Basically, here's the two requests he has.
Figure out smart ways to make life a little less stressful for Americans so they can have children as well as careers.
Conversely, we should also encourage the rest of the world to crown the USA and horn in on the birthrights of American citizens.
But why do we need a billion people?
That's what I want to know.
At least this guy's talking about some optimal number.
Now it seems to me once you get people seriously talking about how many Americans we need, we could have an interesting conversation.
I don't think we need any more.
Certainly not import them.
I'd say we need the same population as we had when we got to the moon back in 1969.
Seems pretty good, as long as you're increasing a little bit.
Was that, what, about 250 million?
200 million?
I think it was like 180 million.
Well, I know in 1945 it was 125 million.
Yeah, so it wasn't that much greater within a 20-year time span.
And in 1945, no one was complaining desperately the place was underpopulated.
125 million Americans seemed to be just Fine.
So here's what Saylor says at the thesis of his book, just to close it out.
Adding this many immigrants, it's going to help us compete with populist China.
We're already competing quite fine with China as is.
One of the main problems is that we've outsourced so many jobs over there, creating a middle class and turning our country into basically a service economy.
Well, and turning us into an absolute Without a doubt, third world country is not going to help us compete with China.
No, not at all.
And well, just by packing more people into this country.
Oh, well.
But that's what that's what goes for wisdom in Washington these days, I'm sure.
Here's what goes for wisdom in New York City.
An illegal immigrant stemming from the Dominican Republic who has a lengthy criminal history has been residing within the New York City area for a while.
He's been arrested and released back in the community a whopping 10 times over the past two years.
10 times.
In two years?
In two years.
Wow.
Five times a year, basically.
Yeah.
New York City disregards policies related to national security and the interests of being known as what we call a sanctuary city.
So, the NYPD has largely ignored immigration detainers for the suspect and many others.
This is the rule from the executive branch there.
We're a sanctuary city.
Now, I'm going to butcher this guy's name.
We'll just say it's Alejandro Soto Ubaldo was arrested in September of 2020 by US Marshals regarding an alleged federal firearm violation.
Now, he's finally in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
Which, if he's ever released, will be handed over to ICE to handle deportation endeavors.
Okay, so we finally have caught this guy.
Yes.
An ICE official, Tony Pham, noted that the agency should have gotten a hold of this guy two years ago.
Two years ago.
He said this.
Soto Ubaldo is one of the many examples of how New York's sanctuary city policies place the safety of the residents at risk.
Their willful, uncooperative nature provides criminals such as Soto Ubaldo the opportunity to re-offend.
ICE official Thomas Decker also commented on the matter.
pointed out that New York City ignored 10 detainers. Again, 10 detainers lodged against
this guy. This is just a microcosm of what's going on not just in New York City, but in sanctuary
cities across the country. This refusal, we've talked about this so many times this summer and
this year about all the officials in sanctuary cities who refused to do detainers. And then I
think there was a guy who went and killed a number of whites in Arizona.
I think he was... I don't remember the exact details.
It might have been New Mexico, but this is going on all across the country.
Well, this, of course, is why you cannot rent a U-Haul truck out of New York City.
They're all taken.
Everybody's clearing out.
What makes this case so frustrating is that law enforcement failed to honor 10 detainers despite Soto Ubaldo's lengthy criminal history.
How can local politicians in good conscience say they're protecting their constituents Well, it's a great question.
laws that release criminals back into our communities."
It's a great question.
Well, it's a great question.
Now, even aside from the federal aspect, the fact that this kind of guy could have been
deported two years ago, why does New York City have a system where a guy gets arrested
ten times and he keeps coming back into the community?
That is the weird thing.
Now, they have this idea if it's a nonviolent crime, then it's okay.
No bail.
But there should be a limit.
There should be a limit.
You know, maybe three strikes and you're in.
But no, this is yet another example of the insanity that we find coast to coast.
Well, here's all the pending charges that he has.
Assault, harassment, criminal mischief, grand larceny, petty larceny, criminal possession of stolen property, and criminal possession of a firearm from these 10 arrests.
This is not, you know, George W. Bush saying that family values don't stop at the Rio Grande type guy.
The exact opposite.
So, welcome to America.
That's the type of guy that Joe Biden wants to grant citizenship to.
Well, you know, and that's the kind of guy that Mr. Bloomberg wants to give the vote to.
Mike Bloomberg, former mayor of New York, he has decided that he's going to solve a problem in Florida.
Since about 2018, convicted felons who have done their time have been allowed to vote.
They have to have paid all their fines and fees and they can't have been convicted of murder or a sex crime.
Okay.
Now that sounds like discrimination to me.
What's wrong with murderers and rapists?
I say fair play for rapists.
Why can't they vote too?
But the point is you have to have paid all your court costs, all your fines, etc.
and this has put the franchise out of reach for 750,000 ex-cons.
Yes, I think that's fine.
Well, Mike Bloomberg has raised $16 million to pay their fees for them.
And put them back on the voter rolls.
How much did he spend on his failed presidential campaign?
Was it 200 million?
No, half a billion?
Yeah, it was a half a billion dollars.
So this is a drop in, this is change he'd find in his couch.
That's right.
Well, he says it's a cost-effective route to victory.
Because he has narrowed it down to just 32,000.
Black and Hispanic felons.
Now, out of the 750,000, he's just going to concentrate on blacks and Hispanics who owe less than $1,500.
They can't scrape $1,500 together, so he's going to do it for them.
I don't understand how he can legally do this just for blacks and Hispanics.
Maybe he can.
It's a private thing, I suppose, so he can discriminate against white felons if he wants to.
But there is an internal memo that RT, the Russian media organization, got a hold of.
And it says that black voters in Florida are, quote, a unique universe, unlike any other voting bloc, where the Democratic support rate tends towards 90 to 95 percent.
Ex-cons are therefore a significant vote share that requires a nominal investment.
For a mere $1,500 a head, you can buy a vote, basically, say they.
Now, suppose they're going to hire up limousines to make sure they get to the poll, or they're going to help them fill in their mail ballots.
Maybe they'll do that.
Now, Mr. Bloomberg has pledged $100 million just to win Florida.
And the $16 million that he raised for the felons vote is not his own money.
He raised this elsewhere.
I'd be curious to know who's kicking in the $16 million so that yardbirds can vote.
Hopefully Governor DeSantis and has his Secretary of State And, you know, the Attorney General of that state figuring out something they can do.
Because this sounds pretty perfidious.
I don't know what can they do.
But the idea, it seems to me, the thing that sounds vulnerable in this plan is racial exclusivity.
Yeah.
But there you go.
Now, according to their calculations, an extra 32,000 ex-con Democrat votes could make all the difference in a very important swing state, namely Flatterer.
And I guess this is going to show you the Dems really know how to fire up their base.
There you go.
Pay off debts for felons.
That's right.
Yes, boy, that'll do the trick.
And you see, then you get a perpetual voting bloc.
As long as they ain't dead, these newly franchised felons can vote Democrat for as long as there are Democrats.
Moving right along, Journalist Amy Horowitz.
Have you ever seen his videos?
He runs around talking to people asking them questions they give the stupidest possible answers to.
He talked to Black Lives Matter activists and he talked to them about the statistics on alleged police racism against blacks.
And of course, well, he asked him, what are the statistics?
Well, how many unarmed black people are killed?
How many unarmed white people are killed?
Is the number of black people disproportionate compared to the number of felony arrests, etc, etc?
And he found not only are they complete ignoramuses on any of these questions, they don't want to know.
And in his video, it's quite striking.
When he spoke to one of them, he says, and he starts telling him the facts.
And this white guy says, I'm getting angry.
I don't want to talk anymore.
And another one said, your data can go and suck the same dick you're going to suck.
And another guy demanded to see Ami Horowitz's sources.
And then when he brought him up on his cell phone, he didn't look.
So I think this is a typical example of the sort of religiosity that pervades this movement.
They don't know and they don't want to know.
This is typical of Democrats.
They are so fired up, so happy about being morally superior, so excited about knowing best that if the facts are going to come along to spoil their story, they ain't interested.
And moving right along to Chicago.
Just this last weekend, it was a relatively tame weekend.
Only 45 people shot and 10 killed.
The previous weekend, 57 people shot and 12 killed.
So, as the weather changes, the number of people shot declines because black people don't like to shoot each other when it's cold.
They don't like to shoot each other when it's raining.
But even so, even so, shootings and murders are up 50% compared to last year.
Through September 13th, police have recorded 540 murders Compared to 364 murders during the same period in last year.
So, that's a pretty good jump from 364 to 544.
Records may be in reach.
And the same, of course, applies to shootings.
The city has seen more than 2,220 shootings so far this year compared to just 1,500 in the same period, 2019.
But I ask you, you follow these things.
Isn't there an ammo shortage?
There is a significant ammo shortage.
Apparently not in Chicago.
Now, maybe the reason there's an ammo shortage is because of all this shooting going on.
Well, that's only seven.
I guess you have to figure in a shooting normally.
Yeah, 2,200 rounds.
How many rounds are fired actually in a shooting?
It's an extraordinary number to think about.
It's a lot.
A lot of rounds going down range here.
Maybe they're using some of these weird ammo calibers you can find at Dick's and some of these places where it's the strangest.
Like, what caliber is this?
I bet not.
I bet not.
Simple nine millimeter.
Yeah, probably good nine millimeter stuff.
But Chicago may be shooting itself to death, but New York is resolved to improve the quality of life.
New York City again.
Let's go back to the Big Apple.
We all know that that's one of the areas that if we actually had a sound government, we would have seen it quarantined during the early stages of the coronavirus because that's where it started to spread throughout the tri-state area.
New Jersey, Connecticut, New York, New York City.
Of course, we can't do that.
That would have been racist, xenophobic.
Well, They're actually taking one step to try and figure out ways to make the subway a little bit cleaner.
Sounds like a great leap forward to me.
It is, and talk about social capital.
The New York Subway Board will soon vote on whether to officially ban pooping on the city's public transportation amid continued coronavirus concerns.
You mean they might vote not to ban it?
They might vote not to ban it, just as they also voted to decriminalize fair jumping.
If you recall.
Right, I do remember.
That all started with Washington, D.C.
because too many blacks were arrested for jumping and not paying the fare, which was costing the city, I want to say, $30 million a year.
It costs all of these transportation companies, these transportation departments across the country.
But anyway.
Back to pooping.
Back to the pooping in New York City.
So according to reports, crews have stated that they are spending more and more time cleaning subway cars due to a recent spike.
We've got a spike in shootings in Chicago.
We have a spike in soiled subways in New York City.
Allegedly, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority said they'd already had a policy in place that bans pooping on public transportation.
However, that's not the case.
It only refers to creating an unsanitary condition and does not specifically single out The act of defecation in public.
So it is barred under current rules, which subject any rider to a $100 fine for, quote, creating a nuisance, hazard, or unsanitary condition, including, but not limited to, spitting or urinating, end quote.
There are people who've gotten around spitting, urinating, by just dropping their pants and Defecating.
So, the plan is to specifically add defecating to the list of bodily expulsions.
Complaints of soiled subway cars surged back in 2019.
So, this is before the mass decrease in riders during the coronavirus lockdown.
I mean, what accounts for this?
Are all the public toilets closed because of the virus?
I wonder why?
Why should there be food poisoning?
What's going on here?
Maybe they're not cracking down on People sleeping in the subways.
People sleeping in the car.
So people are just so vagrant, homeless.
They're just defecating at will.
So there's not much else to add except for the fact that there have been a number of studies done that have shown in April 2020, a couple of MIT economics professors and a physician They pointed out the massive parallel between high ridership and the rapid exponential surge in infection in the first two weeks of March in New York City.
This is a really good study that showed during that time, the subways were still packed with five million riders.
You talk about that.
That's cool.
Exactly.
And so they're worried that somehow Perhaps fecal matter, human waste, human defecation could spread the disease.
Again, the point is we're worried about not being able to compete with China if we don't have an additional 666 million Americans while at the same time in New York City.
I doubt there are too many people.
I doubt there's a defecation problem in Beijing or Singapore or Hong Kong on the subways.
Nope.
I'm quite sure there's not.
And I think that has to do with a certain racial dynamic that we're not supposed to... Just shut your mouth right there, you know.
Yes, yes, yes.
Don't.
As the kids say, don't go there.
Well, let's see.
We have a message, or we had a message, from a fellow named Tyron Woodley.
Tyron Woodley, for all you sports fans, which I'm not, is a fighter for UFC Ultimate Fighting Championship.
And just last week, Tyron Woodley sounded like a broken record at a press conference before his fight.
He wore a Black Lives Matter t-shirt.
Okay.
And no matter what the question was, he always managed to work Black Lives Matter into the answer.
This was a typical answer.
I'm just excited that black lives matter.
Another typical answer.
I feel like, you know, a victory here just really shows how much black lives matter.
Articulate.
Well, and when he asked, when he was asked if he did have anything specific he wanted to say about Black Lives Matter, he said, just the fact that blacks lives matter.
Black lives matter.
Well, there you go.
So, he was a one-trick pony, a one-line broken record.
Well, then he went on to lose to a white guy named Colby Covington, who's a big Trump supporter.
Now, does this loss, is this a divine sign that black lives don't matter?
In any case, he really is on message, as the political consultants like to say.
But now, as I understand, Mr. Trump is battling some of this racial foolishness.
He has extended the ban on critical race theory to other parts of the universe.
Yeah, so kind of gone unnoticed is this amazing story.
Over the past two weeks, some great things are happening.
One, we're seeing Trump go after critical race theory.
A lot of this was due to Tucker Carlson.
His monologue that he did, he just basically said, Mr. President, you have the authority to get rid of this.
And then within a day or two, it happened.
So Tucker, keep these monologues up.
You know, he's more powerful than a U.S.
Senator.
You know, you forget that he was the one who went to Mar-a-Lago and convinced Trump to actually get serious about COVID.
When in fact, if we actually think about what he should have done, was just shut the country down and shut all air travel for a month.
But anyways, and quarantine areas where we knew it was happening.
But we can't Monday morning quarterback what's already happened.
What we can do is we can point out that President Trump deserves kudos for this.
He signed an executive order expanding a ban on government agencies receiving sensitivity training involving critical race theory to federal contractors.
This is very important because this Grotesque anti-white ideology is so pervasive.
It's in NASA.
It's in the SEC.
You name the alphabet agency, they are forced to sit there.
There's that famous video of that rather corpulent black woman in that garish green outfit.
It says something about All white people are racist, and it's got our PayPal account, now PayPal me.
Yes, yes.
You've probably seen that image.
Make a direct transfer.
Yeah, exactly.
That's basically distilled down what critical race theory is.
These instructors, all they want to do is go from contract to contract and basically tell all the white people in the audience, every problem that non-whites face is because of you.
You bigot.
And it's invariably A white instructor who's making that claim, as we know from the, what's the one big book right now?
know, white fragility. No, it's not all white. I mean, sometimes they're in teams. I know
that there are some Indian types, subcontinental Indians.
I mean, just yeah, yeah.
This is a real multi-culti game here.
Well, it's a real growth industry too.
It was.
It was.
Now, let's hope this is going to cut back.
You know, I have a sneaking suspicion sometimes that it opens a lot of people's eyes when they hear this stuff.
But in any case, yes, I'm all for Donald Trump cutting back.
So here's what he said, quote, on Twitter.
Of course, you're banned from Twitter.
He said this, A few weeks ago, I banned efforts to indoctrinate government employees with divisive and harmful sex and race-based ideology.
Today, I've expanded that ban to people and companies that do business with our country, the U.S.
military, government contractors, and grantees.
Government contractors, too?
Wow, great!
Oh, this is big.
Americans should be taught to take pride in our great country, and if you don't, there's nothing in it for you.
So the executive order says the government has prohibited federal contractors from, quote, engaging in race or sex discrimination and required contractors to take affirmative action to ensure such discrimination does not occur.
Now, of course, the sole thrust of this, Mr. Taylor, you with that great Yale education, you know what it is.
We are now seeing... Is this the slow movement of protections for whites?
Into the vernacular!
I doubt it.
If we have a Biden administration, he'll reinstate all of it.
Now, what I don't understand, though, is you said something about sensitivity training that involves critical race theory.
Does that mean that there can be sensitivity training so long as it doesn't involve critical race theory?
In which case, there is a whole lot of mushiness.
I wish he would ban this kind of sensitivity training outright.
I do agree.
Here's the quote.
Here's the money quote.
Therefore, it should be the policy of the United States not to promote race or sex stereotyping or scapegoating in the federal workforce or in the uniformed services, and not to allow grant funds to be used for these purposes.
In addition, federal contractors will not be permitted to inculcate such views in their employees.
It builds on an order issued earlier this month that instructs federal agencies to end diversity training programs that teach about white privilege and critical race theory.
So, you know, this comes in the hands of his incredible speech where he denounced the 1619 Project.
If you haven't read that speech, it's quite important.
I wonder if Stephen Miller wrote it for him.
I would not put it past Stephen Miller to avert it for him.
I'm sure there's some other great people involved in the White House who may have had a hand in having President Trump truly go after the 1619 Project.
The thing about it is, if I were one of these diversity monitors, I would read that order very carefully, and I would simply rejig my teaching so as to skirt around.
Hasn't that word been banned, by the way?
Oh, rejig?
Yes, sorry.
And you know, you can't snicker anymore.
You have to snigro.
No snickering.
That looked like a snigro to me!
Okay, so we'll see.
We'll see if this holds up, and we'll see how long it lasts.
Let's hope it lasts through November.
But leaping across the country to California.
California lawmakers on Sunday sent the governor a bill that would require greater diversity on corporate boards in the state of California saying that the shortage of people of color on the panels on these corporate boards is a hurdle to racial injustice.
The assembly approved a measure that require publicly held corporations headquartered in California to have at least one director from an underrepresented community by the end of 2021.
Now, the underrepresentatives are, these will all be familiar groups to you, Black, African American, I'm not quite sure how they differ, Hispanic, Latino, again, I don't know how they differ, I guess they're covering all bases, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, or Transgender.
Now, I wonder if gender shifters are okay.
You know, some people are male one day, female another day, I guess they don't count.
The only people who clearly don't count are white people.
White people are no good.
And you can have an all black or all Asian board and nobody will bother you.
So once again, the problem is not diversity.
Greater diversity simply means fewer white people.
If you can get rid of all of them, then you've achieved true diversity.
In any case, Assemblyman Chris Holden, a Democrat from Pasadena, modeled his bill on 2018 law that requires a minimum number of women on corporate boards.
Remember that?
You got to have a certain number of women.
Yeah, yeah.
Yep, yep, yep.
So, that's in action now.
Now, the legislators cited a 2018 study by Deloitte and the Alliance for Board Diversity.
Now, that's clearly an independent and objective organization.
That found that out of the 1,222 new board members of Fortune 100 companies appointed that year, 77% were white.
Oh my god, it's a crisis.
It's a crisis.
And also, the Latino Corporate Directors Association released a survey last month that said 87% of the boards of California corporations lack Hispanic representation.
Another crisis.
And yet these companies are some of the top companies in the world, are they not?
They'd do so much better if they had Asians on them.
Okay, you think so?
Okay, perhaps.
Bound to be, bound to be.
The law would also require corporate boards by the end of 2022, that's just a period of two years, to include a minimum of three directors.
from underrepresented communities.
If the board has nine members or more, that means a third have got to be underrepresented.
If a board has five to nine members, it must have two directors from underrepresented communities.
Now there are certain legal issues here.
There are already two lawsuits filed against the 2018 law about women because there's some question as to whether or not you can mandate behavior for companies that may be registered in another state but happen to have their headquarters in California.
That's one problem.
And another one for this one is ordinarily when you are forced to discriminate against white people, you have to be according to the Supreme Court making up for past acts of discrimination.
So we will see whether or not these stand up.
Mr. Taylor, I do want to bring something up.
If you recall back in May, We were doing the podcast live and I noted that the George Floyd riots had started during the day in St.
Paul.
What have you for us now?
Well, I can guess.
The Breonna Taylor stuff.
None of the officers, of course, were actually indicted for the shooting.
They were indicted.
There was one officer indicted for other things.
The Attorney General of the state actually came out and said, no, they actually did knock.
We have somebody who corroborated that it wasn't a no knock.
They did knock to identify themselves, which is big.
Right now there are riots breaking out and they're actually marching into the suburbs of Louisville, going to people's homes and harassing people at home.
So ladies and gentlemen, wherever you are tonight, this is going to take off.
I'm telling you, I've got a sick sense of these things.
Be very careful, you know, if you're in a major city tonight.
Well, my feebler sixth sense suggests that it's going to be mainly a local phenomenon because they did indict one officer, right?
But not for the shooting.
It was for something else.
I mean, for something that he did on a different occasion?
Something that he did during that altercation.
I thought it was something about reckless endangerment of human life.
It did not have to do with the actual shooting of Breonna Taylor, and that's what people are really getting upset about.
Well, gosh, that I hadn't thought of.
Well, okay.
Well, maybe your sixth sense is probably more finely tuned.
Well, it's just fascinating because this week we saw the FBI director say once again that, oh, the greatest threat to the country Is a white supremacist.
Yes!
That's the greatest threat to the country and yet... So the people who are going to be breaking windows in the suburbs of Louisville, all white supremacists.
Attacking cops, attacking businesses, burning private property.
There's never an excuse to burn private property for a cause.
The Ku Klux Klan is out burning property as well as crosses.
That's the FBI.
Okay.
Well, you know, back to California.
The lawmakers who are approving this bill, also they have passed along to Governor Newsom a bill that requires private employees with 100 Workers or more to submit an annual report to the state with pay data for specified job categories broken down by race, ethnicity, and sex.
They don't include sexual orientation.
I guess they don't want them right walking around.
Well are you are you l g b t or q?
But in any case, they want, so long as you got 100 employees or more, they want all this stuff about how much we pay our men, how much we pay our women, how much we pay our blacks.
And because the Democratic spokesman said that the bill fights pay discrimination with data, with information, because when it comes to pay equity for women and people of color, we can't fix what we don't know.
So they're gonna know so they can fix.
Now it seems to me if that's their thing there should be a mandatory questionnaire for all Americans about race and other prejudices so that we can be fixed if we're broken.
But that's what's gonna happen in California if the governor approves and 10 to 2 the governor will approve.
We will see.
Okay.
I think that pretty much goes without saying.
Yeah you have to wonder if he you know the way the Democrat Party is going Is that the highest office he can attain, unless he's appointed?
Say Biden wins.
Would they look to a Gavin Newsom to fill a spot in his cabinet?
Or are the Democrats at that point now where truly white males, Biden will be that last pinnacle, that last figurehead?
Oh, there will be a few white guys in the cabinet.
A few.
I mean, the country's got to look like America.
There's still a few of us left.
The country's gotta look like America, they keep saying.
And if it's all black or all, you know, multi-culti, you know, there'll be a few white guys.
Gavin might be, might be, I think, yeah, Gavin's got a chance.
Yeah.
You know, he might be some black lady's token, token honky vice presidential candidate.
That's, that's the ultimate question.
I mean, what is the ceiling now for a white heterosexual, for a white male heterosexual Democrat politician?
And, you know, if you're not in a state, obviously, you know, in California, you know, whites are, there's a plurality there, but, you know, obviously in states like Oregon and... No, there are more, there are now more Hispanics and whites in California.
Are Hispanics actually a majority?
Not a majority.
Okay, so.
They're a majority of the plurality.
I think Hispanics are something like 38% and whites are 28% something.
But there are more, there are more Hispanics than white people.
Oh, no, that's just a fact.
It's just a fact.
I mean, no, no, no commentary, please.
And we're not on YouTube anymore, are we?
I guess we can express our feelings.
I don't think we're going to get any Joe Rogan-style contract offers from Spotify.
Well, I don't see why not.
But moving on to a different question.
Money for the comrades.
The nonprofits, as we know, focusing on blacks, have really struck it rich, thanks to all the rioting.
There has been $6.5 billion committed To achieving racial equity this year, and that is nearly double the $3.3 billion raised for that purpose in the prior eight years combined.
So, yes, $6.5 billion just so far this year.
In the last eight years, $3.3 billion.
And all but $35 million of this has been pledged since the death of St.
George.
So this has been an absolute jackpot.
Rioting works.
The more stores you can burn down, the more players you can loot, the more money is going to come falling from heaven.
And many of these grants are to nonprofits with black leaders reflecting a view currently in fashion among the philanthropy people.
It's the people closest to communities and their problems that are in the best position to fix them.
Now, I have some examples of the groups that are benefiting from this unprecedented largesse.
One is called the Confess Project.
Confess Project.
Confess, yes.
And it is founded by Lorenzo Lewis.
Of course, he is highly melanated.
And he founded this nonprofit in 2016 to help improve the mental health of men and boys of color.
You know how?
How?
By training black barbers to be mental health advocates.
Now, you got to credit him for a certain amount of originality there and creativity.
And this year, the agency has gotten $218,000, four times as much as the $54,000 it raised last year.
So the riots have been good for the Confess Project.
Then there's something called B360.
B360.
Sounds like a supersonic bomber to me.
But it uses Baltimore's dirt bike culture.
Did you know Baltimore had a dirt bike culture?
I'm well aware of the dirt bike.
Most of them are stolen, actually.
Well, it has a dirt bike culture.
And it uses the dirt bike culture to teach inner-city children about science, technology, and safety by teaching them how to ride dirt bikes.
So, these are the organizations, at least two, that are benefiting from the rioting.
And, as I like to say, millions will be lifted out of poverty.
And I suspect that millions will be lifted into a state of professional competitiveness, giving the lie to the CEO of, was it, Wells Fargo Bank?
Yeah, I haven't looked at Wells Fargo's stock to see if they've taken a hit like, well, most of the stock market did today.
It would be interesting to see if they took a hit because of his comments about race.
Maybe it took a jump.
If you want to look it up real quick, go ahead.
Wells Fargo CEO Charles Scharf exasperated some black employees in a Zoom meeting this summer when he reiterated that the bank had trouble reaching diversity goals because there weren't enough He made an assertion in a company-wide memo on June 18th that announced diversity initiatives as nationwide protests were breaking out following the death of our fentanyl-imbibing friend, George Floyd.
Quote, while it might sound like an excuse, the unfortunate reality is that there is a very limited pool of black talent to recruit from.
Scharf said in a memo that Reuters saw, several black senior executives across corporate America said they were frustrated by claims of a talent shortage and called the refrain a major reason companies continue to struggle adding enough racial and ethnic diversity to leadership ranks.
Quote, there is an amazing amount of black talent out there.
Amazing?
said Ken Bacon, a former mortgage industry executive who's on the board of Comcast, Alley Financial, and Welltower.
So, I guess this is a black guy who's well-connected and he's that token blackboard member for all these organizations.
He said this, quote, if people say they can't find the talent, they either aren't looking hard enough or don't want to find it, end quote.
Well, let's be honest.
Every corporation across the country, especially Goldman Sachs, all these major hedge funds,
all these banking conglomerates, they're doing everything they can to find the top black
talent.
And you know what?
That weeds out the talent that exists for the smaller banks that can't pay the type
of lucrative bonuses and the type of recruitment deals, a bonus that you get if you sign on
and you meet your milestones each year in terms of contract work.
Everybody gets a bonus if he makes his company more diverse.
And this is why the blacks that do have real talent, they just hop from one lovely job to another.
Same with high-powered types in academia.
You know, they jump from Harvard to Yale to Princeton and back again.
Yeah, to Cornell, exactly.
Yes, musical chairs.
Yes, Cornel West, he's one of the great examples.
Boy, everybody wants Cornel West.
His intellect seems to be about three miles wide and one centimeter deep, but everybody loves Cornel West.
So there you go.
And of course, it's because being black.
Black privilege really trumps white privilege any day, which is why so many ladies these days seem to want to be black.
So just in this single month, Mr. Kersey, three of them were unmasked.
Three white people, three honkies, who are pretending to be sisters!
You know, at the end of the Scooby-Doo cartoons back in the 70s and 80s, they would unmask the supposed villain.
You thought that it was a ghost or a ghoul or a goblin, but it would turn out they'd lift the mask off and it would be one of the characters they'd introduced earlier in the episode, just a human.
So that's what basically was happening right now.
You've got the situation where you don't need the mystery machine to find out that there is no such thing as white privilege in America.
These ladies you're about to tell us about are getting ahead by latching on to.
Yeah, black privilege.
They are forsaking.
We're supposed to be just swilling in this lovely, lovely white privilege.
I guess it's not so pleasant after all.
So, the latest was Satchewal Pagelin Cole.
Great name.
Well, you know, you'd think with a name like that, that would raise eyebrows, but black ladies these days have unusual names, so I guess Satchewal Pagelin just was taken for granted.
And then another one was called C.V.
Vittolo Haddad.
Now C.V.
Vittolo Haddad, she came clean and she says that she's from Southern Italy.
So I guess the Haddad part is just for show.
Then, of course, there is Jessica Krug.
You remember her?
She's at George Washington University.
She was, in fact, had a tenured position there.
She had parlayed blackness into a tenured job at one of the top universities, George Washington University.
But no, she had to go.
Now, I kind of, you know, the fact is I feel kind of sorry for these ladies.
Nobody is accusing them of having been spies and pretending to be black to come in and undermine the movement.
Nobody seems to doubt that they were sincere.
They worked hard.
They were just as blackety black as anybody.
They're trying to be even blacker.
Royalist, more royalist than the king, as the expression goes.
Well, because their credentials were actually better.
Well, but the point is, no, my point is, they were not trying to undermine black people at all.
They were knocking themselves out trying to be good to black people.
And of course, they had that lovely psychological boost of being superior, of being victims.
victims of being able to hector and insult white people.
And I mean, given a choice between part of the villain race of human history and part
of the hero race of human history, who wouldn't want to be black?
So who are they quislings to if we use that nomenclature?
They're not quislings, but you see, they're not quislings.
They're not, well, I suppose you could say in a sense they're betraying whiteness, but the people who are angry are not white people.
White people are sort of bemused.
The people who are furious are black ladies.
And you know why?
I think it's because they don't want white people horning in on their racket.
They're the ones who are getting ahead by being oppressed and being marginalized and being sectional this and the... Hey, white ladies!
Come on, hey!
We don't want to share the swag with you.
There's only so many pieces of the pie to go around and the more hands that could end them...
The less of the pie there is to share.
And if that turns out to be a white hand, boy, it gets slapped.
Especially when it's washed and you realize it's a... Wait a second.
Yeah, well, you know, and then there was, of course, the one that everybody's heard about, Rachel Dolezal.
You know, she was blonde and blue-eyed when she was a kid, but then when she started going blackety-black, she started darkening her skin and kinking up her hair and doing her best to be black.
And her career had really taken off.
You know, she had been elected to be the head of the NAACP chapter in Spokane.
And she was on the Spokane Citizen Advisory Police Ombudsman or something as a black woman.
That's right.
It was really taking off.
Being black was paying off for her.
And then poof, all gone.
And now she's kind of scraping by as a hairdresser.
And she's changed her name to Inequa Majuba or something like that.
Come on!
Is that real?
She changed her name.
I can't remember exactly to what.
In Cuba, something.
But it's very black.
That apparently is her way of going underground.
Nobody knows she's Rachel Dolezal anymore.
But when this lady, with her blue eyes, maybe she wears dark contact lenses, she says, I'm Inequa.
I guess you're supposed to not realize this is Rachel Dolezal.
But in any case, she is scraping by as a hairdresser now.
What happens to a white lady who has been demoted from being a black lady?
I don't think there are many job opportunities.
Where's the career path for somebody like that?
I mean, they're going to be sleeping under bridges.
No comment.
They've taken a hell of a beating.
Maybe they're going to be in a battered woman's shelter.
It's going to be tough.
I feel sorry for Jessica Krug.
She was a professor, she had books published, and she actually has a manuscript that is supposed to be scheduled to come out pretty soon.
What's going to happen to that?
If memory serves correct, didn't the Duke Duke University Publishing did our first book.
And I think they're the ones who had a second book that they were all getting ready to come out.
Are they going to publish it now?
I suspect not.
It'll be pulped.
And they'll ask for the advance back.
Precisely.
Poor Jessica!
What's she going to do?
What's she going to do?
I really feel sorry for these ladies.
It just shows you that there's no viability in whiteness in the eyes of the elite.
No, no.
There's no percentage in it.
No percentage in being white.
You're much better off being black.
What did they give up by ceasing to be white?
Nothing as far as I can tell.
And they get all this moral superiority and righteous indignation.
And this Jessica, let's see, Jessica Krug, you know, there's a video of her.
She's got this crazy phony accent and she's berating white people.
Oh boy, it's something special.
But she can't get away with that anymore.
And no, she's confused.
But the other interesting thing is Satchelin Pagelin Cole and C.V.
Votolo Haddad, they are people For whom you're not allowed to use the pronoun she or her.
When you talk about them you say they.
Are they transsexual?
I don't know what those terms are.
And Satchelin Pagelin Cole was active in the LGBTQ movement too.
Now was she a phony with that too?
Does it turn out she's really, I don't know, a committed nymphomaniac hetero?
I don't know.
But she was active as an LGBTQ also.
So these ladies are confused.
Let's put it that way.
But I understand perfectly why they wanted to be black rather than white.
I mean, they are rather homely, unremarkable ladies.
And they just, you know, the rewards are so much greater to being black.
So there you go.
That's the exciting news from the race shifting scene.
Now, what I don't understand is, you know, if tomorrow morning I said to you, Mr. Kersey, I'm a woman.
Oh, okay.
Rather homely woman, okay.
Well, I don't know, rather distinctive looking.
But yes, homely woman, I'd have to agree, balding and all that, but you'd say, okay, yes, dear, and you'd humor me, but I can do that, but I can't say, well, I'm a black woman too, while you're out.
No, no, that's no good.
And race is supposed to be a social contract, but no.
These ladies were found out because they were biologically white.
Now doesn't that tell us it's not a social contract?
Precisely.
And again, it also completely repudiates this idea of, again, just the absurdity of white privilege.
Again, they're promoting the interest of blackness because that's the capital.
You see, I'm convinced of two things.
One is the rewards are great.
After all, her book, this Jessica Krug's book about something like diaspora, freed slaves, this, that, and the other.
It was a finalist for the Harriet Tubman Prize.
And the Douglas Prize.
And the Stephen S. Douglas Book Award.
Now, you have to write about blackety black stuff.
Not Stephen Douglas, Frederick Douglass.
I wish it was.
I beg your pardon.
In a different timeline, perhaps there would be a statue of Stephen Douglas in D.C.
I'm confusing my Douglasses.
Thank you, thank you, thank you for that correction.
So, there you go.
No, so, on the one hand, the rewards are greater materially and it's, I'm sure, a lot of it's got to do with the psychic of rewards.
Because they're on there among the good people.
They're among the saints.
That's got to be really important.
But, so, anyway.
Yeah, that's, and who knows?
Who knows how many more will come to light?
Who many more?
How many more are actually passing without being discovered?
We'll see.
Or those we will never see.
I guess they'll go to their graves as being phony black people.
Yeah.
Or maybe on their deathbeds.
I have to confess.
It would be quite fascinating to find out what percentage of the talented 10th is actually.
Well, the fact is you take a look at them and you know they can't have been born blonde and blue eyed.
Most of them I think it's pretty easy to tell.
But moving to Italy.
Nearly half of the migrants aboard a Spanish NGO vessel.
It's one of these rescue vessels that takes these poor huddled masses yearning to breathe free and takes them to Italy.
It was stuck off the coast of Sicily by the Italian authorities because they wouldn't let them dock.
There were 275 migrants on board.
124 of them just jumped into the water and start paddling for the shore because, of course, they knew that the Thailand Coast Guard wasn't going to just fold their hands and watch and see if they could make it.
No, they fished them out of the water and they took them in.
So, that's the way it goes.
Altruism.
Altruism is something you count on.
But it's not the first time.
You know, remember, I remember some years ago, there was a bunch in a boat, and one famously threw a baby into the water.
And this was really near some bunch of white people who were telling him to go away.
And a white man, of course, dives overboard and rescues the baby and does not take it back to the boat.
It came out, took it back.
Anyway, so they can count on white people to do the ultimately suicidal thing, fish him out and take him to Italy.
Now, This to me is a story significant because so far there have been no fewer than 22,000 illegals who have made their way into Italy across the Mediterranean.
We don't hear about this stuff anymore.
22,000?
No, no, no.
At least it's not nearly as bad as 2016 when 181,000 Came across the Mediterranean.
But this is still a very significant... Barely over 10% of that, but yeah, that's astonishing.
It's still a significant... 22,000!
More people!
More than people the kind... Iglesias wants to come here!
There shouldn't be one.
The number should be zero.
The number should be zero.
But these are the kind of people that Matt Iglesias wants to stuff into America
so that we can have a billion, a billion people.
Compete with China.
Yeah, yeah.
And you have to get out your field glasses, see if you can find a white person, you know.
Maybe what they'll do, I'm guessing the last white couple, maybe they'll stuff them and put them in a museum along
with a dodo, you know, we'll see.
But speaking of museums, I remember last week we talked about a British museum,
I think it was the Plymouth Museum.
Shrunken heads, right?
Shrunken heads, yes.
And they had removed the shrunken heads because these were considered somehow stereotypical and bad and just not good, unhealthy for human minds.
Well, we had, I thought, a rather well-informed commentary from a reader.
Just a few comments on your podcast that mentioned the removal of shrunken heads.
The new breed of egalitarian anthropologists is going around claiming that Native Americans did not practice headhunting, cannibalism, human sacrifice.
They're covering up the extensive anthropological literature that document these practices.
I used to be friends with Anank Noonik, whose son was at that time the president of the Shuar tribe, formerly called the Jivaro.
He openly admitted that his people were headhunters right up until the Ecuadorian army put a stop to the practice in the 1960s.
Goes on to say, my friend Katia's grandfather was a German man who once walked into a Shuar village, this is the Jivaro, the Jivaro famous for being headhunters, just as they were about to begin feasting on a roasted human body laid out on a wooden table in an open space between the longhouses.
The Shuar were friendly and invited him to join them.
Katya's grandfather partook, fearing that if he abstained, he risked being eaten himself.
Now, he says, as far as museums go, as a small boy I loved going to the Smithsonian Institution in Washington so I could admire the Natural History Museum's impressive display of approximately two dozen ancient adult Incan skulls that had been subjected to cranial shaping during infancy.
You know, they would strap them to boards and the heads would deform as a result.
The mothers would strap boards against their infant skull to sculpt the little head into unusual forms such as sloping foreheads Cubical craniums with 90 degree angles on the corners.
When I went back in 2012, the display had disappeared and the museum staff had no memory of it ever having existed.
Can't have that stuff.
And he says, I sure hope the museum staff stored the skulls and shrunken heads safely rather than destroy them.
Actually, I wish they'd give them to me.
I'd love to have them if they're being de-accessioned.
My fear is they'll just probably destroy this stuff.
They're probably in a box somewhere like that great scene from Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark where at the very end they put the Ark in that box and then they put in that massive warehouse.
It's this ever-expansive warehouse as the movie ends and it's this, you know, the Ark of the Covenant is just Put haphazardly into this government storage facility and... Well, it could be, but if that's the case, then it could show up someday.
But the point is, you're just going to conceal the evidence.
This is like the statistics on crime that nobody wants to hear.
These BLM activists who say, you know, go suck, whatever, rather than talk to me about the data.
Oh, what?
Shrunken heads?
Hey, show me one.
Huh, that's just a bunch of baloney.
White man myth.
Because they took them all away.
Exactly.
Yes, but anyway.
That comes to the end of our program.
Our heads are shrinking rapidly, so we have to sign off here.
▲
Export Selection