All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 24, 2020 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
49:24
Serge Trifkovic: "Migratory Jihad and the Crisis of Europe" (2018)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I'd like to introduce our next speaker.
I certainly hope he's nearby.
Do I see it?
Ah, excellent, excellent.
Our next speaker is Serge Shrivkovic, and he is the author of the best-selling book, The Sword of the Coppet, and its companion volume, Defeating Jihad.
And he is currently a professor of international relations at the University of Bania Luka in Bosnia-Herzegovina.
And in the past, he's been a broadcaster for Voice of America and for BBC.
And he's also written for a huge variety of publications that run the gamut from the Times of London to Komsomolskaya Pravda.
And I doubt anyone in this audience has written for both those publications.
And Professor Trifkovich is one of the keenest observers of the threat of Islam to Europe, and he's going to speak to us today on the subject of migratory jihad and the crisis of Europe.
please welcome Serge Trifmanch.
No, I'm not sure if this works.
can you hear me
The Serbs have been left without a voice.
Okay, what happens to the PowerPoint?
In the meantime, a Serbian joke.
What's the difference between a dead dog and a dead gypsy in the road?
Well, there are tie marks in front of the dog.
Okay.
Now, this looks rather pale.
Is it maybe possible to switch off the front lights?
It will brighten.
Well, everything will brighten once I'm dead.
That's no bloody good, is it?
Okay. I will rush you through some of the common places that the Western world in general and Europe in particular are threatened not only by a small and overtly jihadist elite.
Which engages in terrorism, but a demographically vibrant, ideologically highly developed, yet decentralized and structurally amorphous faith-cum-radical ideology called Islam.
It has global proportions and scripturally ordained, literally unlimited ambitions.
Now, the contemporary upsurge of Islam as an ideology and as a blueprint for political action...
is a phenomenon that cannot be compared in dynamism, energy, and potential consequences with any other contemporary creed or dogma.
It can only be compared, perhaps, to Bolshevism in its early period after the victory of Lenin.
It relies on demography as a paradigmatic tool of asymmetric warfare in order to achieve long-term geopolitical results Unattainable by other means.
The threat is real and it demands cool, heavy diagnosis and a sustained response.
The problem is that meaningful discourse on Islam is effectively fair-bought in Europe.
In America and Europe, in fact, we have an elite consensus that Continuous open-ended immigration in general and the existence of an ever-growing Muslim diaspora within the Western world in particular are to be treated as a given and must not be treated as problematic.
Now, that consensus must be tested against evidence, and I believe it has been tested, not against the norms of acceptable public discourse imposed by those who have created the problem in the first place.
One day, millions of men will leave the southern hemisphere of this planet to burst upon the northern one.
Algerian President Huareg Boumediene famously stated in his address to the UN General Assembly in 1974:"They will burst in to conquer, and they will conquer by populating it with children.
Victory will come to us from the wombs of our women." The ensuing half century has produced a host of phenomena of truly historical significance.
Europe, as it's aging, no longer renews its generations but welcomes millions of migrants from the Middle East, Africa and Asia who have radically different values about sex, political power, culture, economy and God.
The process is not spontaneous.
Population change in flows of migrants and radicalization of the Muslim diaspora may have such appearance, but both have been systematically encouraged and facilitated by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the Emirates and other state actors.
It is striking that the ultra-rich Gulf monarchies have accepted no refugees from Syria while actively encouraging and financing Their westward movement, first to Turkey and then from the Aegean ports on to Greece and into the heart of Europe.
In the early decades of the 20th century, interaction between Islam and the West started as a serious challenge to Islam and by the turn of the millennium it has turned into a threat of the West.
How was this possible?
Well, first of all, due to European suicide of 1914, with the consequences of which we are still living, and by the fact that Turkey has made a remarkable comeback as a regional power,
probably the only one in history to make a comeback, because when Rome and Athens and Spain and after Philip II went into twilight...
They went out forever.
Turkey has made a comeback.
The impact of the ongoing Muslim migratory influx into the Western world and the consequences of the ever-growing Islamic diaspora are inseparable from any coherent long-term defense.
As I will elaborate later, controlling the borders on land and sea is only the first step.
Terror. It is the only variety of terror...
which threatens infidel countries and nations as such.
It belongs to the fourth generation warfare and it's particularly hard to target the enemy and to evaluate results.
Hundreds of terrorists may be behind bars or dead and moving money has been made more difficult but the potential and actual human assets of the enemy His reach and operational capacity and especially his ability to count on the support of the multi-million Muslim diaspora in the Western world are actually growing all the time.
The squeamishness of Western political masters in naming the enemy and the use of euphemisms such as violent extremism is but one sign of a shared malaise.
That hampers a coherent effort.
War on terror was hardly on target, confusing the enemy with his tools.
It's like war on elephants by the Romans against Hannibal.
War on kamikazes in December'41.
The jihadists, in the meantime, have a network of second generation of operatives, many of them naturalized Muslim immigrants, and their Western-born offspring.
The decentralized pattern and legal status makes countermeasures difficult.
There is no command and control system to disrupt links among autonomous self-motivated groups of young people deeply embedded inside the host nations.
A new strategy is needed.
The victory will come not by conquering Mecca for the West.
but by disengaging the West from Mecca and by excluding Mecca from the West permanently and hermetically.
It is necessary to scrutinize the doctrinal and ideological roots of the problem in order to diagnose its causes and to develop effective defenses.
This has not happened in the decision-making community on either side of the Atlantic.
Trump initially appeared intent to rethink the issue with welcome clarity, but it has been curtailed alas, like in every other endeavor of his, by the permanent state establishment.
The proceedings
In 2004, before the so-called 9 /11 Commission, demonstrated early structural weaknesses in the prevalent assumptions, inevitably leading to faulty conclusions.
The real struggle to come, the report asserted, was within the Islamic civilization between reformers and traditionalists regarding such issues as the position of women, the place of non-Muslim minorities, etc.
The reformers, the report said, Would need to devise new Islamic interpretations of those questions.
But to postulate the existence of a reformist wing within Islam and then to charge it with the task of redefining some of its key scriptural, legal and social concepts is simply absurd.
It's the equivalent of ordering the hunt for the unicorn.
It shows that the Commission has not faced the message and implications of Islam as such.
Its sacred texts, its continuous historical record, and its contemporary political ambitions.
Postulating the dichotomy between a reformable Islam and an aberrant Islamism was a fallacy which has now gelled into granite-like elite orthodoxy.
Now, that orthodoxy can and will be challenged.
Starting with a critical assessment of the remarkable career of Muhammad.
At the same time, the prophet of the new religion, the creator of a supremacist political ideology, and the violent promoter of a radical legal and social program.
Of course, he remains to all Muslims the inviolable paragon of goodness.
But attempts to reformulate the doctrine of jihad are not new.
They have failed because they opposed centuries of firm and solid orthodoxy.
A few well-meaning intellectuals have been clamoring for the birth of reformed Islam for ages, but as Clement Hewitt pointed out back in 1907, and I quote, until the newer perceptions as to what the Koran teaches as to the duty of the believer toward non-believers have spread further and have more generally leavened the mass of Muslim belief and opinion,
It is the older and orthodox standpoint which must be regarded by non-Muslims as representing Mohammedan teaching and as guiding Mohammedan action.
End of quote.
And this has not changed over the past 110 years.
The willingness of a few to become objectively bad Muslims because they are willing to reject discriminatory and offensive tenets of historical Islam may be laudable in human terms.
But it will do nothing to modify Islam as a doctrine.
Islam sees the world as a permanent existential conflict between the world of submission, Dar al-Islam, where Sharia is the law of the land, and the world of war, Dar al-Harb,
which must be conquered by Jihad.
This is the most important bequest of Muhammad to his heirs and the source of a permanent threat to all neighboring Muslim polities.
Of all major religions, Islam is accordingly the least amenable to coexistence with other faiths and other social and political models.
Islam's legal code, the Sharia, cannot be penetrated by reason, and any such attempt is heresy.
Where an explicit command of Allah, or a precedent established by his prophet, as recorded in Hadith, already exists, no man and no human institution, no legislature, no non-Islamic court can form a valid judgment.
The notion of popular sovereignty is heretical, as power belongs to Allah alone.
Politics is not part of Islam.
It is the inherent core of the Islamic imperative.
of Allah's absolute sovereignty.
Mass migration marked the birth of the Islamic Empire and from that moment on, to quote Khamenei, it grew with blood.
The contests of infidel lands, mass enslavement of infidels and the taking of booty and ransom were since then divinely sanctioned and remain so today.
The first onslaught against Europe came in the early 8th century across the streets of Gibraltar.
The second came in the 14th across the Dardanelles.
And it was not until the second siege of Vienna that the Islamic conventional warfare against Europe was finally crushed.
But for long before that, the Islamic world had little interest to say and very little to contribute.
At least measured against enormous cultural and scientific developments in the Far East and the West.
The Latin tension developed between the view of world history as the fulfillment of Islam and its triumph everywhere on the one hand and the reality of the scholar decadence and weakness on the other.
The absence of any spirit of critical inquiry, essential to the growth of knowledge, has always been the key to understanding Islam's close heart and close mind, which today threatens our own civilization, having destroyed what promise it had of developing its own.
The third conquest is now in full swing.
It started in the 1960s, when Muslim gas-tabiters from Turkey Initially started arriving in significant numbers to Germany and the Algerian Muslims to France, the subcontinental Muslims from partitioned India in Great Britain.
Many of them expected and were expected to spend only a brief period of their lives in the industrial secular West.
The old reluctance to submit to life under the infidel was overcome.
by the lure of economic opportunity.
With expanding numbers and the creation of distinctly Muslim neighborhoods in West European cities in the late 70s and the early 80s, however, the initial detachment of culture from territory has been reversed, and the bold notion of conquest by demographic rather than military means entered the activists' minds.
And what was interesting is that their children had no respect whatsoever for the countries they were born in.
The parents had some degree of grudging respect for the imperial efficiency of the Indian Civil Service or the French administrators in Central and Western Africa and Indochina,
but not so those who were born in the West and who...
We're not inspired either by the traditional culture of Racine and Corneille or Shakespeare or Goethe or any of the European paragons of philosophy and art.
The blueprint for them was developed in 1981, when the third Islamic conference of Kaaba adopted the Mecca Declaration, which decried the, quote, oppression suffered by Muslim minorities
and communities in many countries, and appealed on all states in which their Islamic minorities to allow them full liberty, and also pledged to propagate the precepts of Islam and its cultural influence throughout.
the world.
Ironically, at the same time, policy planners and strategists in Washington tried to use Jihadism as a political military tool.
In his famous interview in Le Nouvel Observateur in January 1988, Zbigniew Brzezinski thus gloated over how the Carter administration had instigated Islamic resistance to the pro-Soviet government in Afghanistan and thus maneuvered Moscow into military intervention.
During the decades following the Mecca declaration, a new mosque or Islamic center It was open somewhere in the Western world on average once a day.
Their number exceeded 10,000 in 2016.
As far as the signatories of that declaration were concerned, this did not mean that the Muslims in those countries were no longer oppressed.
They are, as long as they are not governed by Sharia, and as long as they're offended by the non-Muslim practices of the majority.
Demands for freedom from oppression, quote, unquote, And pledges to propagate Islam were advanced irrespective of the fact that the signers of the declaration, notably the Saudis as the chief bankrollers and hosts, openly oppressed non-Muslim communities in their own lands or prevented them from being established at all.
The result is that from Norway to Malta, the face of Europe is changing.
Its southern maritime frontier is as porous as the southern border of the United States.
In the next few decades, we'll witness a massive demographic, overwhelmingly Muslim-led population replacement, unless something happens.
Europe's self-destroying birth rate, coupled with migrants who multiply faster and who keep arriving in fresh millions, are transforming the continent beyond recognition.
Go to Malbec, go to Rotterdam, go to Brussels.
The declining fertility rate of native Europeans coincides with the institutionalization of Islam in Europe and the re-Islamization of the Muslim diaspora.
The Spanglerian prediction of a slow, gradual Untergang is out.
On current form, the decline may be rapid and terminal.
At the same time, The pathology displayed by Western political leaders defies belief and explanation.
Specifically, we all know about the attacks in Cologne, but what happened after those attacks is remarkable.
The German ambassador to Britain, one Peter Amann, said, We see signs of gratitude.
We see signs that these people are making the best effort to integrate.
It takes a lot of time and effort, but it's working.
He was lying through his teeth.
In reality, far from being grateful, these people heartily despise the Germans for being supine.
The inability of unaccompanied young German women to visit many public spaces and facilities after dark without fear of being gang-raped is one of the results of Merkel's refugee policy.
And German feminists reply with a proud slogan:"Better rapist than racist!" It's an advanced form of psychopathology and it finds an apt expression in the fact that a young woman from Freiburg was raped and murdered by Muslim migrants a year and a half ago.
She was working for an NGO welcoming migrants and her parents decided to ask the mourners to donate money that would have been paid for the flowers to that same organization helping the migrants.
How sweet!
Merkel presents the rest of Europe with a sort of fait accompli That reminds one of the arrogance of the Kaiserreich in 1914 and the Third Reich in 1939 with even worse consequences because at least the first two were guided by misguided notion of German grandeur and the third one results in suicide for everyone.
Former Soviet bloc countries, to their credit, resist such inanities generally, and mandatory EU migrant quotas in particular.
They may yet save themselves from their Western neighbors' demographic and cultural suicide, perhaps indicating that communism had been less morally and spiritually corrosive than hedonistic liberalism.
I was in Moscow three weeks ago, and a Russian friend of mine actually explained.
The Pavlovian carrot and stick situation.
So you could be a party apparatchik in the morning, preaching dialectical materialism to your students, say, and come home, have a couple of vodkas, and crack jokes about Brezhnev and discuss the world as it really is.
But you guys in the West, if you read the New York Times or the Washington Post and watch...
MSNBC and follow the mainstream Weltanschauung, you have no chance of breaking free.
You really need to assert the degree of bravery and of integrity that is difficult to expect from most denizens of today's Western world.
So why?
Because according to him, the message in the West had been Internalized through subliminal Freudian indoctrination, the art of which the communists, the comrades, had never been able to master.
Now, defeating this enemy means defeating the elite first, and then using all means, including involuntary mass deportation, to clear the decks.
And yeah, I just remembered that the lady, the poor young lady, was 19-year-old Maria Landenburger.
That was in December 2016.
And the example of her degenerate family shows that to some it may look like the game's up.
But I will come to the reasons why it is not.
In the meantime, let's continue with the bad news.
Europe started the new century with fewer children than adults of reproductive age.
This negative momentum implies that even if women in the future should have an unexpected fertility increase to, say, 2.2 children, which is enough for simple replacement, the population would be destined to continue shrinking.
The process is literally unprecedented.
Negative momentum has not been experienced on a large scale in world history so far.
Of course, we did have the Black Death, say, in the mid-14th century, but it affected both men and women, children and old people equally, so there would be a temporary dip, and then there would be a return to steady increase.
This curve affects primarily the young.
On current fall, people under 30 will account for only 16% of Europe's population, or 80 million people in two decades.
By contrast, in the 22 Arab countries, Turkey and Iran, under 30 already account for 70% of the population, or 350 million people.
By the end of the century, if things continue this way, There will be no Europeans as members of ethnic groups that share the same language, culture, history and ancestors and inhabit lands associated with their names.
At the same time, the shrinking populations are indoctrinated into believing or are being forced into accepting that the demographic shift is a blessing that enriches their otherwise culturally deprived and morally unsustainable societies.
On the political and cultural front, all over Europe, many Muslims already consider themselves de facto autonomous, a community of believers opposed to the broader society of infidels.
Jihadist networks exist in every country west of the Iron Curtain.
The emergence of a huge diaspora of the faithful away from the heartland is an event linked to the conquest of Medina in the Hijra of 622, And for those people who come to the West,
the prime objective of the mullahs in the Islamic centers is to keep them away from the host society.
They must feel no kinship.
They must feel no part of the institutionalized process of any kind.
Their activists nevertheless invoke those same institutions and values when they clamor for every kind of indulgence and special treatment.
Tariq Ramadan, the rapist intellectual from Paris, is a paradigmatic example.
We don't owe you anything, but you owe us everything because you have the liberal paradigm and therefore you would be betraying yourselves if you didn't grant us every indulgence we want.
At the same time, the elite class imposes more understanding of the underlying causes.
Of the problem of Muslim lack of integration, such as racism, discrimination, alienation, lack of employment and opportunity, poverty, and racism again.
Their objective is to eradicate the capacity of Europeans to define themselves and to accept what the Swedish Minister for Integration, Stolberg, said, let's be kind to them today so they're kind to us when they become a majority.
Now, what to do?
I know that legislation doesn't resolve much, but it is a useful start.
And therefore I have six recommendations which are attainable, theoretically at least, through legislative process without the kind of fundamental revolution of both spirit and institutions that I believe are necessary.
So I would call it a useful start.
First of all, protect the borders physically and hermetically.
No counter-strategy is possible without physical control of the boundaries, including land and maritime ones.
Fences the work as the example of Israel's West Bank, security barrier...
Oops, sorry.
And the Hungarian southern fence demonstrate.
People picked up from sinking ships, by the way, should be taken to the country of departure, specifically Libya and Turkey, and not to Sicily or Lesbos, because from there they only continue their journey on to Europe.
Two, deny entry to Muslims.
Now, the really important part of Trump's executive order, 13769 of 27th of January, The United States must ensure that those admitted to this country do not bear hostile attitudes towards it,
and its founding principles cannot and should not admit those who do not support the Constitution or those who would place violent ideologies over American law, etc.
In other words, Section 1 treats Orthodox Islam as a violent ideology inimical to America's founding principles.
It can and should be used to broaden both the meaning and intent of the Act and to use the broad model of the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, the McCarran-Walter Act.
So we don't really need to invent the wheel.
We simply need to reactivate something that's already there.
It allowed the exclusion or deportation of any alien who engaged or had a purpose to engage in activities Prejudicial to the public interest or subversive to national security.
Islamic activism should and can be treated as the grounds for exclusion or deportation.
Useful precedents also exist.
For instance, in 1903, Congress barred the admission of anarchists in response to President McKinley's assassination.
Now, as for free, supervise and...
Spy on Muslims and on Islamic centers?
Obvious. The threat is different in degree to that face during the Cold War, but not in kind.
24 /7 surveillance is a necessary part of the response.
It is an empirical fact that mosques, Islamic centers, and their individual members are the cause of unrest, terrorist threat.
And undermining of Western institutions, so all over the Western world they should be treated as people who spread an inherently seditious message incompatible with the law of the land and common decency.
Subjecting them to adequate scrutiny also has a model.
It's the McCurran Internal Security Act of 1950.
The condition of sine qua non is to declare that the First Amendment does not protect jihadism, a radical revolutionary ideology inherently seditious and inimical to American values and institutions, no less than Bolshevism or National
Socialism.
As for refusing and rescinding citizenship of Islamic activists, it's obvious that a Muslim who declares an oath when becoming citizen...
Quote, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and adjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potent, and state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject, and that I will support and defend the constitutional laws of the United States against all enemies,
foreign and domestic, is lying, or rather practicing takia, which is the art of dissimulation used by Muslims to...
Confuse and misguide infidels.
It is sacrilegious for a Muslim to swear to this since it means that he would be prepared to shoot a fellow Muslim or denounce him to the authorities in defense of his adopted homeland.
Those who falsely take the oath of citizenship and continue preaching Sharia in quality of infidels and women, etc., should be stripped of acquired citizenship and deported to the country of origin.
Islamic activism should be defined as the political act of propagating discrimination against Christians and other infidels, violence against women, sanction of slavery, politics, etc.
A resident alien or prospective visitors known or suspected adherence to an Islamic world outlook or active affiliation should be grounds for exclusion.
As for profiling, this is a no-brainer.
Israelis profile everyone all the time.
Arabs profile other Arabs.
Indians profile Pakistanis and vice versa.
Japanese profile Chinese and Koreans.
A young Muslim man is about seven million times more likely to carry out a terrorist attack than a Roman Catholic or an Orthodox Christian, a Jew, a Hindu, a Buddhist, or even a Lebanese or Syrian Arab Christian.
Membership of a group is a valid pointer in assuming and judging unobserved behavioral characteristics of an individual, especially in the absence of specific information about his background.
Profiling is not good or bad, it's just policing.
And, of course, I didn't even put a number on denying security clearances to practicing Muslims.
A person's Islamic faith and outlook are incompatible with the requirements of personal commitment, loyalty and reliability that are essential in the military, law enforcement, intelligence and other related branches of government.
For as long as practicing Muslims are able to get security clearances, potential terrorists will continue trying to get into the hiring pools.
Presence of practicing Muslims in such institutions is an inherent risk to its integrity and morale, and the security of its personnel.
Examples abound, such as the Fort Hood massacre perpetrated by Major Nidal Hassan.
The experience of Europe demonstrates that immigration from majority Islamic nations creates a permanent terrorist threat and adversely affects the whole society's coherence and quality of life.
In America, the process is still not as far advanced as in Germany and France.
it still can be checked, even eliminated.
A newcomer's adherence to the tenets of jihad, sharia, etc.
should mean exclusion, not only for those who want to come in, but for those who are already here.
Now, we once had a legion of Moscow's apologists, character witnesses, moles, and fellow travelers.
Assuring us that the comrades wanted nothing but social justice at home and peaceful coexistence abroad.
They explained away and justified the bloodbath of the Bolshevik revolution, the crime of the great famine, the show trials and purges, the killing machine of the Gulag.
Today, their heirs in the academia and the media explain away, with identical scholastic sophistry and moral depravity, the violent implications of the Quran, As for the creativity and talent,
suffice to say that the total experts of the Arab world, other than fossil fuels, to the non-Arab world, would equal the value of Finland's exports.
There are five and a half million Finns, And there are 80 Arabs to each fin.
Once upon a time, the West and the Muslim world could clearly define themselves vis-a-vis each other in a cultural and political sense.
What post-modernity and secularism have done is to cast aside any idea of our land, of space that is ours in the ethnic, geographic and cultural sense.
A space that has an external boundary and should be protected from all those who covet it, but have no claim to it.
But the liberals love a boundless world.
So that's why we have LGBTQ +, because boundaries between genders, between races, between cultures, between religions, and between states, of course, must be eradicated.
They love the process of always becoming and never being.
It's a form of neurosis.
It's a form of psychopathology.
But it is all prevalent.
We have schizophrenic approach of the elite to the demographic replacement in its insistence that Islam is peaceful and tolerant, that the West has been nasty to it.
What about the crusades?
And that terrorism can be understood and cured independently of Islam's teaching and practice.
At the root of the malaise is the notion...
That countries do not belong to people who have inhabited them for generations, but to whoever happens to be within them at any moment in time.
A further malevolent fallacy is the dictum that we should not feel a special bond to any particular country, nation, or culture, but transfer our preferences to the whole world of humanity.
Such bizarre notions have been internalized by the elite class on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean to the point...
Where they actively help Islamic conquest.
To the members of this class, all countries are but transient virtual reality entities.
Atheristic sentiments may have to be invoked strictly as communication tools for hoi polloi from the Paris and the mountains who provide the cannon fodder for the Fallujahs and Kandahars.
But like Marx proletarian, the elite member knows no loyalty to a country and its members could serve anyone or all of them.
For instance, in Brussels, if they can be turned into the tools of their Wille zur Macht.
The refusal of the elite class to resist Islamic demographic conquest reflects a global problem that is the synthesis of all others and really goes beyond culture wars.
In the transformation of an increasingly globalized society into a socio-technological system regulated by the market, All shades of human relations and nuances are being simplified into manageable routines and procedures,
while the obsolete notions of human existence become unsustainable.
This is the culture of the artificial world, post-historical, technological, post-human.
The reversibility of the signifier and the signified, terrorist and victim, oppressor and sufferer, native and immigrant, church and mosque, extremist and moderate.
Eventually eliminates the creator and the subject in general, with nothing but the subject's signature being left.
The elitist upholders of such views belong to the culture that has lost its bond with nature, history, and the toiling community, the flyover country of deplorables.
In the meantime, the onslaught continues unabated across the Mediterranean, the Aegean, throughout GFK and Heathrow.
Far from enhancing diversity, it imposes a drab sameness and eradicates the identity of target populations.
It demolishes their character and uniqueness.
The betrayers promote an ideology of universal value.
In reality, diversity is creating its exact opposite: a soul-numbing monism.
For all the outward differences, Western elites share with the mullahs and sheikhs and imams the desire for a monistic one world.
They both long for the great Gleichshaltung that will end in Stroke Talbot's single global authority, proclaimed in 1992, post-national, seamlessly standardized, and Ummah, under whatever name.
The Christian vision of Triumph God, who allows choice, diversity.
Individuality and free will is the enemy to both versions of this vision.
Those Westerners who love their lands more than any others and who put their families and their neighborhoods before all others are normal people.
Those who tell them that their attachments should be global and that their lands and neighborhoods belong to the whole world are sick.
They seek to destroy the uniqueness of home and earth, the bonds that bind wife and husband, parent and child, community and neighbor.
Tradition and faith, and therefore should be destroyed.
The global bien-pensants in the elite are jihad's indispensable allies.
Ruthless, arrogant, contentious of the deplorables, they're confronting the enemy without naming him, without revealing his beliefs, without offending his accomplices, without expelling his fifth columnists.
It is up to the deplorables to stop the madness.
The elite class wants them to share its death wish, to self-annihilate as peoples with historical memory and cultural identity, and to make room for the post-human monistic utopia spearheaded by the jihadist's fifth column.
The crime can and must be stopped.
The founders of the United States overthrew the colonial government for offenses far lighter than these.
In all creation, disease and frailty invite predators.
The loss of the will to define and defend one's bloodline and native culture, and the loss of the desire to procreate, send an alluring signal to the teeming souks and caspas.
Cans, there's money for nothing, chicks for free.
It's a candy store with a busted lock.
Islamic supremacism, by contrast, is more firmly rooted than ever in the ideology of cultural and political imperialism.
But the game is not up.
Dar al-Islam is not inevitably the end of the road.
Tens of millions of especially young Westerners are still endowed with feelings and reason, with the awareness of who they are.
Their struggle to defend themselves against the world of submission is just starting.
I don't know how it will end, but we do not know what will come.
Just look at Europe in 1913.
Proud, rich, and controlling the world.
Look at it now.
The reverse may happen.
In the face of historic uncertainty, true to the legacy of their ancestors at Tours and Kosovo and the gates of Vienna, they will hold on to life and beauty and truth.
Whatever the cost and whatever the outcome.
Thank you.
Do we have time?
Maybe time for one question perhaps.
I find the topic fascinating and kind of scary, but really fascinating.
I like the concept of the North, too.
My question has to do with, my understanding is during the early age of Islam, they went through a thing where you had reason, and they argued a lot back and forth whether reason was something that was important.
And the leaders finally decided that they couldn't accept reason because that would make it another god.
And so then they rejected reason, and that's why it isn't a big part of Islam today.
And my question is, is there any chance that they would have an enlightenment or a renaissance like the West did, and that it would become less violent than it is today?
Frankly, no.
And the period you're referring to was also the period when the Persians exerted a great deal of artistic and intellectual influence in Baghdad in the East, and the Jews and Franks in Andalus in the West.
And of course, in the Western academia and politically correct intellectual circles, it's the examples of those two centers of learning.
Baghdad and Al-Andalus that are celebrated as some kind of pre-modern utopia.
But it's really not that the Islamic thinkers abandoned reason.
They simply came back to the original paradigm, which is strictly nominalistic.
You simply follow the...
Command as expressed in the Quran, or else if it's not contained therein, then in the four books of the proved Hadith, there will be the examples of Prophet's behavior, orders, and examples of his memory of his acts as transmitted by his companions.
And this is purely done on the basis of deduction.
If there is no example of women riding camels in Prophet's time, that means they shouldn't drive the car today, etc.
So the closing of the mind of the 12th century that you describe is really not a novelty.
▲
Export Selection